Document nk7nkZDJ4aYKbojR2x7MxQq0a

FILE NAME: Z,, DATE: DOC#: , OCUMENT DESCRIPTION&ZEZ 'Federal Accardingly. the cOJl1Illent period fqr dryer asbestos risk under the ConsUIJIel'- ' Any person may obtain a copY of this by submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration. Office Notice No. 82-8 is ex.tended and will close on July 15, 1962. List of Subjects in 14 eFR Part 91 Product Safety Act. 44 FR2882S{May 17,.' 1979}.' After the Commission proposed the ' rule in May 1979, all of the affected", ,: of Public Affairs, Attention: Public . Information Center. APA-430. 800 Independence Avenue. SW. .Washington, D.C. 20591. or by calling 426-8058. CommumcatioBS must M~....ilf" the docket number of this Persons interested in being on a mailing list for future should also request a copy of .l"AllVlS;orv Circular 11-2, Notice of ,,:Prnnnlu'!d Rulemaking Distribution System. which describes the application procedures. On June 15. 1982. the FAA issued Notice No. 82-8 which requested public comments on proposed changes to SFAR Several alternative proposals were presented. One suggestion would be to divide the additional slots at controlled airports in a 70 percent-30 percent proportion. Under this proposal, the , ,jots would be distributed in three Air traffic control. (Secs. 307 (a) and (e). and 601(a), Federal manufacturers, importers. and private, : .". labelers acted voluntarily to recall the ~~' Aviation Act of 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. hair dryers containing respirable Sections 1348 (a) and (c). 1354(a). and 1421(a)): Sec. 8(cJ. Department of Transportation Act l~ U.s.c. Section asbestos fibers. The Commission "', C"'" approved corrective action plans for all.: :" , .. of those companies, and the public.waa.;~~;, ': 16SS(e))) notified of the recall on television.,in.., ::, Issued in Washington. D.C., on June 23. newpapers. and by signs in stores. ',--: ';', ' 1982. Consumers returned nearly two million, ': J. Lynn HeJms, of the'hair dryers. ' . c" '. Administrator. The Commission now believes that ' '<. " (FR Doc.az..17458P11ed&-~;8:45am) regulation of the risk will not be ' " ' " BILUNC CODE ...,&-ta-M , ~======~=======- CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION , " 16 CFR Part 1145 necessary. If regulation unexpectedly.'; ,". -became necessary.the Commission ' . could again propose a,rul~ like the one proposed in May 1979. -:::. The Commission hereby withdraws, -', " the proposed rule (16CFR 1145.7}J~;.~" ;:f.:~; regulate hair dryers containing asbestos., : '" ' Hair Dryers Containing Asbestos; Withdrawal of Propoeed Rule to Regulate Under the Consumer Product Safety Act under the Consumer Product Safety Ac~:._ ,.' " (Sec. 3O(d), Pub. L. 92-573, 88 Stall23t.II8';", ~>i';',' amended. 90 Stat. 519. 92 Stat. 3742.(15 U;S.c.:,- 2079(dJ) phases: first at a New Entrant Random , Lottery; then at an Impacted Incumbent Ranked Drawing; and finally at a General Random Lottery. Comments AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. List of Subjec:ts in 16 CFR Part 116' .. , Consumer protection. cancer. , " asbestos. were also invited concerning proposed alternatives. Comments on the NPRM to be submitted on or before June 1982. On June 22. the ATA submitted a petition to extend from June 29 to July 15 date by which comments on the NPRM must be received. In support of its petition, ATA states that additional time is necessary to attempt to reach a consensus on a replacement proposal. , A states that because many of the individuals necessary to take part in\this effort are currently involved in other related events. additional time is, therefore. necessary to file -::omments acceptable to a significant segment of entire industry. ATA's comments Were filed on behalf of 13 carriers. They advised that United Airlines objects to the request. SUMMARY: In 1979 the Commission proposed a rule to use the procedures available under the consumer Product Safety Act, rather than those of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, should regulatory action against hair dryers containing asbestos become necessary. Since the Commission now believes that no such regulatory action will be necessary. it is withdrawing the proposed rule. DATE: The withdrawal is effective on July 28. 1962. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Shakin. Office of the General Counsel. Consumer Product Safety , Commission. Washington. D.C. 20207; telephone (301) 492-6980. SUPPl.EMENTARY INFORMATION: During 1979 the Commission began Dated: June 23.1982. Sadye E. nWm. Secretary. Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. az..17484 riled ~ 8:45 am) BlWNG CODE 1355-01-11 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND . URBAN DEVELOPMENT Office of the Assistant Secretary far' Housing-federal Housing Commissioner 24 CFR Part 201 [Docket No. R-82-980] Property Improvement and Mobile Home Loans On June 22. the RAA requested' an investigating a risk of injury associated AGENCY: Department of Housing and "AlIOW:llUll of 2 weeks in the comment with the inhalation of respirable Urban Development (HUD) Assistant to permit regional carriers to consider adequately and to offer asbestos fibers emitted in the airflow of hair dryers containing asbestos. If Secretary for HOUSing-Federal Housing Commissioner. Comments regarding future slot allocation policies. regulation of that risk proved necessary, the Commission preliminarily believed ACTION: Proposed rule. ,Extel1sion of Comment Period that the Consumer Product Safety Act would provide a more expeditious way SUMMARY: Section 338 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 In consideration of the ATA and RAA of eliminating or reducing it than would amended the National Housing Act to .petitions. the FAA concludes that the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. permit special loan limits for extending the comment period until fuly The Commission therefore proposed a manufactured (mobile) homes and lots 15 would serve the public interest. This rule. in accordance with the applicable located in high cost area designations. minor extension will not affect the statutory requirement (15 U.S.C. This rule would increase the maximum ,agency's ability to implement any new mechanism in a timeiy manner. 2079(d)). finding that it would be "in the public interest" to regulate the hair loan limits by varying amounts up to $7.500 for single and multisection homes