Document nk6DerNdEnkO34ja4rOMqXva8

ATTACHMENT 4 2024-EPA-05254 Sierra Club FOIA 2024-EPA-05254 ED_017426_00003045-00001 SC_EVERSPLIT0002053 Attachment 4 LASS1TER.PENNY@e parnail.epa.gov 04/21/1998 1 1:42 AM To: Bill Dameworth/POPTAL cc: Subject: Re: Cluster Rules -Reply To. S111 Damewortn, Pope and Talbot - Halsey, OR apolocize for nct responding to your E-Mail. As you can imacine, I am getting many vestiocs from all over the industry and States. My problem is that I am getmino similar related questions set in a srm^i''t mill context. We are wcrh:n to compile the questions and responses to put into a guidance document. I, am reluctant to ter: one mill something at this point for fear of telling another mill somethino ^4 ".".*r 'tour cuasz'on on the chip steamer has been a very "popular" question in the industry. Unfortunately, the question has been posed differently every time I've heard it. I have had scale communication with Rob Kaufmann of AFLPA. : have requested SC7e diagrams and some wri:eecs to help me understand the problem. I understand :hat AFi.PA is puttina somethinc together, but I have not received anything co daze. The questions : have thus far have related co :=C= and Kamyr continuous digesters. I'm not familiar with the M&O dicester sc don't know how it compares to these two. Tne intent of the rule is to control venzinc off the steamers and ventinc off of the chip bin if the chi; steamer vents :hr.:1=h the chi; bin where waste or flash steam is used. As I we did not intend to capture situations where only fresh steam is used. 2024-EPA-05254 Sierra Club FOIA 2024-EPA-05254 ED_017426_00003045-00002 SC_EVERSPLIT0002054