Document nekk2GqxEV58Jwnd8BzxLe2X
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
3048 Research Drive, State College PA 16801 814-231-8032 FAX 814-231-1253
Analytical Results W2336 Columbus, GA
3M Sample Identification
MC-501H MC-503H MC-506H NA MC-507H NA MC-508H MC-584H NA
Sample Description
Site 1 P/N Surface Water Site 1 P/N Surface Water Duplicate Site 2 P/N Surface Water Site 2 P/N Surface Water Duplicate Site 3 P/N Surface Water Site 3 P/N Surface Water Duplicate Field Blank-P/N Empty Quiet Surface Water Quiet Surface Water Duplicate
PFOS (ng/L)
63.8 59.9 76.6 83.3 55.4 55.4 <25 <25 < 25
J Compound is present, but below the reporting limit of 25 ng/L. The result is an estimated value.
Method Detection Limits are approximately 2.5 ng/L for PFOS and PFOSA and 7.5 ng/L for POAA:
PFOSA (ng/L)
11.7 J 13.2 J 16.5 J 17.6 J 12.0 J 14.9 J <25 <25 <25
POAA (ng/L)
26.1 25.6 26.1 26.7 23.6 J 24.3 J <25 <25 <25
Please refer to the reverse side for our standard terms and conditions.
Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
3048 Research Drive Phone: (814) 231-8032
State College, PA 16801 Fax: (814) 231-1253 or (814) 231-1580
Analytical Report
Fiuorochemical Characterization of Surface Water Samples
Columbus, GA (W2336) Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014E
Testing Laboratory Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc.
3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801
3M Environmental Laboratory Contact Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Phone: (651)778-5352
Requester Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D. 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
PAGE 1 0 F 5
1 Introduction
Results are reported for the analysis of a series of surface water samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples were collected from Columbus, GA. The Centre study number assigned to the project is 023-014.
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography / tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) was requested for ail samples. A total of 8 samples were received for analysis.
The samples were prepared and analyzed by LC/MS/MS for the following list of fiuorochemicals:
Table 1: Target Analysis
Comoound Name Perfiuorooctane Sulfonate Perfluorooctane Sulfonvlamide Perfiuorooctanoate
Acronvm PFOS PFOSA POAA '
The analytical method used was validated by Centre. The validation protocol and results are on file with Centre. Data presented here is the highest quality data available at this time.
2 Sample Receipt
The samples were submitted in individual plastic containers and were not preserved. Eight individual sample containers were received. Samples were received on 05/03/00. The sample collection dates were not supplied. Chain-of-custody information is presented in Attachment A.
3 Holding Times
The analytical method used was validated against a maximum holding time of 14 days. The stability of the analytes of interest for longer periods has not been determined.
page 2of s
4 Methods - Analytical and Preparatory
4.1 LC/MS/MS
4.1.1 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
Samples were initially treated with 200 uL of 250 mg/L sodium thiosulfate solution to remove residual chlorine. Solid phase extraction (SPE) was used to prepare the samples for LC/MS/MS analysis. A forty-m illiliter portion of sample was transferred to a C18 SPE cartridge. The cartridge was first eluted with 5 mL of 40% methanol in water solution. The eluate was discarded and the SPE column was then eluted with 100% methanol. A 5 ml portion of methanol was collected for analysis by LC/MS/MS. This treatment resulted in an eight-fold concentration of the samples prior to analysis.
4.1.2 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS
In HPLC, an aliquot of extract is injected and passed through a liquid-phase chromatographic column. Based on the affinity of the analyte for the stationary phase in the column relative to the liquid mobile phase, the analyte is retained for a characteristic amount of time. Following HPLC separation, ES/MS provides a rapid and accurate means for analyzing a wide range of organic compounds, including fiuorochemicals. Electrospray is generally operated at relatively mild temperatures; molecules are ionized, fragmented, and detected. Ions characteristic of known fiuorochemicals are observed and quantitated against standards.
A Hewlett-Packard HP1100 HPLC system coupled to a Micromass Ultima MS/MS was used to analyze the sample extracts. Analysis was performed using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Samples were extracted on 5/18/00 and analyzed by MS/MS between 5/20/00 and 5/21/00. The HPLC and MS/MS methods used for analysis and instrument parameters can be found in attachment D.
5 Analysis
5.1 Calibration
A 7-point calibration curve was analyzed at the beginning and end of the analytical sequence for the compounds of interest. The calibration points were prepared at 0, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 ng/L (ppt) The response of the quantitation ion versus the concentration was plotted for each point. Using linear regression with 1/x weighting, the slope, y-intercept and correlation coefficient (r) and coefficient of determination (r2) were determined. A calibration curve is acceptable if r >0.985 (r2> 0.970).
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples.
Calibration check standards were analyzed periodically (every three to five sample injections) throughout the analysis sequence. Compliance is obtained if the standard analyte concentrations are within +/-20% o f the actual value.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met.
PAGE 3 OF 5
5.2 Blanks Extraction blanks were prepared and analyzed with every extraction batch of samples. The
extraction blanks should not have any target analytes present at or above the concentration of the low-level calibration standard. For these samples, the extraction blanks were compliant.
Instrument blanks in the form of clean methanol solvent were also analyzed after every highlevel calibration standard, and after known high-level samples. Again, the blanks should not have any target analytes present at or above the low-level calibration standard. For the samples presented here the instrument blanks are compliant.
5.3 Surrogates
Surrogate spikes are not a component of the LC/MS/MS analytical method.
5.4 Matrix Spikes
Matrix spikes were prepared for every field sample (excluding blanks) at a concentration of 100 ng/L using all compounds of interest. Matrix spike recoveries are given in Attachment C. All compounds showed matrix spike recoveries between 70-130% in all samples.
Field spikes were prepared* on sample MC-501H at a concentration of 100 ng/L using all compounds of interest. Field spike recoveries are also given in Attachment C. The field spike results showed low recovery for PFOSA. All other compounds showed matrix spike recoveries between 70-130%.
5.5 Duplicates
All samples (excluding blanks) were analyzed in duplicate. Results are given along with the
sample results in Attachment B.
5.6 Laboratory Control Samples
Milliq water was spiked with all compound of interest at 25 and 250 ng/L. All recoveries for all compounds were between 70-130% in each LCS. Results are given along with the raw data in Attachment D.
5.7 Sample Related Comments
Field blank samples consisted of empty containers. Forty milliliters of type I water filtered
through a hypercarb cartridge was added to the empty container and analyzed in the same
manner as the other samples.
_
6 Data Summary
Please see Attachment B for a detailed listing of the analytical results.
7 Data/Sample Retention
Samples are disposed of one month after the report is issued unless otherwise specified. All electronic data is archived on retrievable media and hard copy reports are stored in data folders maintained by Centre.
PAGE 4 OF S
8 Attachments
8.1 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 82 Attachment B: Results. 8.3 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries (Field and Laboratory Spikes) 8.4 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data
9 Signatures
Other Lab Members Contributing to Data Enaksha Wickremesinhe Karen Smith David Bell
PAGE 5 OF 5
EMNUVLIRTOI-CNIMTEYNSTTAULDMY ONITORING: SURFACE WATER
August 2000 Adessfigunlleyddteoscorbibtaeidn ipnrtehliemMinaayry4,d2a0t0a0asbuobumt dititsapletrosiEonPAo,f tfhlueomrouclhtie-mciticyasltsuidnythweas tcdepyonoopmveteesirmnonotefoinartdm.cliisseaIponnluetiur,rtssicuaeieoplslontyafo. ksffTliehuxhuoicnermittomoiacenhfuso,elatom(intd-hcdiscri,taeeyalennpsvpdtirauropioddrrnysuem)scpeateasnrniecrbteeaabdliseneeiandxdgcproiotiennysxukcahruimanesvsgitnoitnwemhgdaae.tmtremTrasanhitgloeuehfsustatwncurdtieduteshyrurislmanttagacfnriyotodyrbmtethhteahtis expanded depending on further results. Bsclohoacomsauetmdlidoenorbnsceiffaaculolrluntihssneietdrooefrrtheeflvdauitoeawcrsaoatcaehnbgedromoraayindcaoablflysas,susiiesptdpohlefaynsinvlbofioercreoanmntimoalenteaisnor.ntnTaeplhdemutrshot,aantithintefoiinrvsgiienxto-gocfpimttrhyoaesgntsruuiaxfdmayccitptouynrroliygn,rgaomr without the ability to differentiate supply chain from non-supply chain cities. plToohcteaetnmiotiunalsltiws-ociuitthrycvesatsuroidofyuhwsulimellvayenileselodxpfeofnlsuvuoirrreoo.nchmTehemenitccaialtildersieswtlereaibrseuestsieaolnnedcdtveadatartioaosurwsepteyrllepsaeessndotfautraboann lTademuefprrhafubiplcennualhskeeineacsniintiaptfengri.afcrorwll,Amouwsamddutagedert:rpfrieoaturiibccnobeesentlureaiwaycfpk,llaplysepyttl,-eoi,ooetrrrawrskee.cn"s,aomeTtcladuehhnadmiedrwckd,nksaeraiesfatimntnnpeb,kpdoahtilsrsneosseksutgiaberdttwtlofm"oeaa,gbceotpseeenf,rrtmsoco,ewbadtivtatcouefarprirciosknaehwlslea,f,adyrfeotso,egelormwurgd,,dshs,ltgpeeohmerrdce,eoaiimaldilpknnufeo,fadcnlsburtstmsrmei,benwruaeltienirdvl,tsile,oc'irgbnimaprecfneialassuedlhrandkl,maeeb:nptesdla.efndils.l, wwwTFtiTlrnehelehaeavdeopnrtteerireeernlciesMrredaers.sotsareeuaesfne)pyelSstfttoceuhesls4oru;ela,totntoMshts2tftrh.ea0dotooeih0nrcIfbn0ieinhMrientlcehsdddekaltme,ruaiydnriAtdiqneaecg4eulktsaa,depuwa2ilbcnsrll0aatt.aiogtas0tgmvyebOwa0firraldianaenso;isetlunmsldyeaieubnrfnvtdrmotwdetsaheuhalinotesPtrimatcsoomciacelpsirfilttuuloptisfieenlbeuolSstsasrmilttn-ft.(h(coamCiDLiteankttooneuyaeadrlcndctlueseaeiatsmedfftudirriu,gebdeeofFrnlltmuyd,utlao.hsaAois,rlnetraIlhiGradondmfeebicceaesgphalso)ltuaidmrlerxdirdumgndraiecicdgea;iiditcnpt,unpCiagioaerornllrsensotet.thtdvcsiochneeeTofPfasdlnohttaeteuhhrtnensdareeduuserirnads,bsseitencsrmuudouikindselinliatettkyntsed,aigcanlatngandbdle reviewing the surface water data. aSthduedbsistieixoqncuiaetilneatsn.toSalatyhmteipcoalerlsidgwainteaarlehsacusoblbmleeciettnteadolbfortfaoiimnnfeosdurmrfofaartcvieoanwriafootuersrtwhsoeautMerrcueclsto,il-bucoimttyhnsfstlauomdwypin,legs from
astnrdeaPmFsOaSnAd.iMn aarpesaosfotfhqeusiaemt wplaetelor.caAtnioanlyssaensdwtehree dpaetrafoarrme epdrefsoernPteFdOinS,tPheFOA, attached data sheets. In summary, the data indicates that in most samples of the water column in flowing tPsqsrhthauFrronieOeewgaetSimenwcdigisnat,aiftetvrnehsoaro,emrmsMylaeai2monvl5boegppluillcpsoeeots,frnAtPeiconsFleu,8ntOlDh3ttSrpese.apcPwtatTio.aotrhuAsntursen,S.sia,Att.hlTaylLe,hssreuaeesnrbcceoideoenlfaoPldrswooaecsrmaettthwttpSieoooltenf.dss.LseeatctuTesmocclhoiltpeeeiflocedFfntsieaIr,wdltsiastmefhsrraoieoentwtmdocoeofdrfql2eldu5etpahcioeptterateptpd,wtsrMaaofeotnrsaeredyarntts2hcl0eieen0vo0ef,ls analyzed, and summarized in the report dated August 2000. TsEhsgc1haoe0ahfmonnf,ve0ewesep0ciaredt0lbaned.eLelas,rIe,lelattneyvohbvsietsdeeelhlesleulesftemnoroevorcrfteaflmhslPenasaaaFimpmnnfrOpoeaptturddSohloneeextndisonidromoieebtbnfeabaeotsratthto0eihlhseln.la3.ysfqt0faa3outtmp0hrhieppepettmphalswetdea.s,mafTmHatinpehrOiredlniespinfwnwoploogertwocl,liMuasanb,tlndioetaodhblnnyoei2diwleie9Pnld,0dtodDah0ripapectehapcsSctanathte,t.firdauerLotertmynu,shipcafaecaiengeNcpcdnttqroiaoePvu,rsOeiosbeelrybnotot.sctwfhSee1Iratno0o.vte0fLfarwbutolcheiiech PTmFhoOestcAroenwscuaelsntsftoraauttnioodrnibsneolloefvwtheletsholeethslesevrtehlaasnnoafllyOqtOuesap,npPtt.iFfTiOchaAetrioaennadorefP2Fn5oOpeSpnAt.v,iAraotrnethmvreeerneytcalioltywef,lfoewcciattsthions, expected at these levels. Towheneodvetrreaalltmmeunltti-wciotryksstu(PdOy TisWco)nptilnanutinign.flSuaemntpalensdoefftfhlueelnetaachreatbeeainngdapnuablylizcelyd. Vstaulfifds,ataenddatnhaelymtiacrakleptrboacsekdeutrseasmhpavliengbepernogdreavmelowpieldl croemcemntelnycfeosrhvoarrtiloyu. s food
- BeLtatkere's ;
Additional sampling sites01890 MapCutoom. Inc.; 01800 GDT, Inc.ij;. ; shown on south map
Environmental Sampling Sites N & E of Columbus, GA
MMSuinaterici#nip2aal MMSuinaterici#inp3aal
.lf*3 / \
C100Q M ipQ u M loo m , Ino.; 01800 GOT, Inc.
Environmental Sampling Sites for Columbus, GA