Document nK4Kg69ow06dr8bzOmnMKRn6

RESOLUTION CONSULTANTS Resolution Consultants A J o in t Venture ofAECO M & EnSafe 510 Carnegie Center Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Technical Memorandum Perfluorinated Compounds Soil and Groundwater Investigation Shenandoah Woods Housing Complex Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania 19 March 2015 through 31 May 2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Technical Memorandum summarizes the findings of a soil and groundwater investigation performed by Resolution Consultants (Resolution) at the Shenandoah Woods Housing Complex, located at the former Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) Warminster between 19 March 2015 and 31 May 2015, under Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Atlantic, Comprehensive Long Term Environmental Action, Navy (CLEAN) Contract No. N62470-11-D-8013, Contract Task Order (CTO) WE 28, The former NAWC Warminster is an 824-acre facility located in Warminster Township, Northampton Township, and Ivyland Borough, Bucks County, PA. As a result of the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act (BRAC), NAWC Warminster was closed on 31 March 1997; the entire the property, except for the Shenandoah Woods parcel, has been transferred to the private sector for redevelopment. Custody of the Shenandoah Woods Housing Complex on the NAWC Warminster property was transferred to NASJRB Willow Grove located in nearby Horsham Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Historic waste disposal locations were grouped within three general areas on the former NAWC property (see Figure 1): Area A (Sites 1, 2, and 3), Area B (Sites 5, 6, and 7), and Area C (Sites 4 and 8). A fourth general area (Area D) primarily includes the former main building complex at the former NAWC Warminster. This perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) investigation focused on the former Navy housing area, consisting of approximately 55 acres, which includes a portion of Site 5 of Area B. PFCs are persistent in the environment and are an emerging class of environmental contaminants. PFCs are used to make a wide range of products including oil-, stain-, heat-, and water-resistant materials such as clothing (i.e. GORE-TEX), carpeting (i.e. ScotchguardTM), furniture, food packaging (i.e. popcorn bags), flooring (i.e. StainmasterTM), non-stick cookware (i.e. Teflon), stain/water resistant paint, and roofing materials. They were also used as surfactants in metal plating baths, shampoos, moisturizers, shaving cream, oil well surfactants, aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), and semiconductor baths. Additional applications of PFCs include use in rust inhibitors, starting materials for herbicides/pesticides, acid mist suppressants, aviation hydraulic fluids, and adhesives. (Tetra Tech 2014). Short-term Preliminary Health Advisories (PHA) were developed by the USEPA for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) (0.2 micrograms per liter (pg/L)) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (0.4 pg/L) to reduce potential exposure through drinking water (EPA 2009 and 2014). Currently, there are not PHAs for the remaining four PFCs (perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA], perfluorohexanesulfonic acid [PFHxS], perfluoroheptanoic acid [PFHpA] and perfluorobutanesulfonic acid [PFBS]) evaluated during this study. The PHAs for PFOS and PFOA are not directly applicable to soil. PFCs (PFOA and PFOS) were identified in on-site and off-site wells in the vicinity of NAWC Area C during the five year review (Tetra Tech 2011). This investigation was initiated at Shenandoah Woods in 2015 to support property transfer by characterizing the occurrence and concentrations of six PFCs: PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFHpA and PFBS, in soil and groundwater. During this investigation, eight soil samples and one blind duplicate were collected from four boring locations and groundwater samples were collected from six monitoring wells with one blind duplicate. Groundwater data for PFOS and PFOA were compared to the PHAs. PFC sample locations are shown on Figures 1 and 2. US00008222 RESOLUTION CONSULTANTS Resolution Consultants A J o in t Venture ofAECO M & EnSafe 510 Carnegie Center Princeton, New Jersey, 08540 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES As part of this investigation, soil borings were advanced and three dual-nested monitoring well pairs were installed in the Shenandoah Woods parcel. On 19 March 2015, a geophysical survey was performed by PULS, Inc. of Bethlehem, PA under Resolution oversight for utility clearance purposes in each of the proposed boring and monitoring well locations. Soil Borings On 23 March and 24 March 2015, two soil borings (SB01 and SB02) were advanced using direct push technology to 5.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) and four soil samples, one blind duplicate, and one matrix spike/matrix duplicate were collected from the boring sidewall from depths between 0.5 feet bgs to 3 feet bgs. Soil samples were collected above perched groundwater encountered at approximately 3.5 feet bgs. Soil borings were advanced at two of the nested monitoring well locations. Four soil samples were collected from the sidewall of two monitoring wells (HN-107 and HN-109). Soil samples were collected at depths ranging from 0.8 feet bgs to 8 feet bgs. Monitoring Well Installation Dual nested monitoring well pair locations were selected hydraulically down-gradient of Sites 5, 6, and 7. Well installation details are summarized below. On 23 March through 27 March 2015, the initial boreholes were advanced at the HN-107, HN-108, and HN-109 locations (Figure 2). The boreholes were advanced by Raab Drilling of Perkasie, PA, a Pennsylvania-licensed driller, using an air rotary drill rig, under oversight of a Resolution geologist. Based on previous investigations at the Site, the target depths for shallow monitoring wells were approximately 50 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 100 feet bgs for the intermediate monitoring wells. At each location, a 10-inch carbide hammer was used to advance borings to 20 feet bgs and 10inch steel outer casing was installed. Borings were advanced through the outer casing to the maximum depth of 100 feet bgs using an 8-inch carbide hammer. Two flush mounted, 2-inch diameter monitoring wells were completed at each location. Monitoring wells were constructed with 2-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well screen and riser. The annular space was filled with Number 1 sand to two feet above the well screen. Filter pack material was used under the sump cap (minimum of 6 inches). To seal the annular space between the shallow and intermediate wells, a five foot thick (minimum) hydrated bentonite plug was installed above the filter pack and the monitoring well was sealed above the shallow screen using bentonite slurry via pressure grout injection to 0.5 feet bgs. The well seal cured for 24 hours prior to surface completion of the well pad. After 24 hours, no loss of annular space grout to the formation was observed. A 10-inch diameter man-hole cover was installed within a 2 foot by 2 foot concrete pad at each well location. Monitoring wells were developed on 2 April 2015. Soil cuttings and groundwater generated during drilling were captured by an in-line containment system. Soil cuttings were containerized in a roll-off and groundwater generated during drilling and well development purge water were containerized in drums. The roll-off and drums were transported to the NAWC groundwater treatment plant. The roll off was removed for disposal, the drums were removed for off site disposal on 23 July 2015. Completed monitoring wells were surveyed in Pennsylvania South State Plane, UTM Zones 17 and 18, by R.L. Showalter & Associates of Chalfont, PA. A Well Construction Table is provided as Table 1. Well construction details are summarized in Table 1 and the well locations are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Boring logs and well construction diagrams are included in Attachment 1. 2 April 2016 US00008223 RESOLUTION CONSULTANTS Resolution Consultants A J o in t Venture ofAECO M & EnSafe 510 Carnegie Center Princeton, New Jersey, 08540 Groundwater Sampling On 16 April 2015, monitoring wells were gauged and sampled in accordance with EPA Region 1 LowStress Sampling Guidance (EPA 2010). Precautions were taken to avoid sample contamination and/or bias during collection per the draft Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) (Battelle 2015). Products containing Teflon were not used during sample collection, handling, or transportation. Sampling personnel did not use any waterproof items, wore only well-laundered clothing, and attempted to identify and isolate any potential PFC-containing materials that might cross-contaminate groundwater samples. During gauging, depth to groundwater was measured above the well screens in all six monitoring wells. Well screen intervals were selected based on where saturated conditions and/or fractures were encountered during drilling. During drilling, weathered bedrock was noted in the upper 55 to 77 feet of the boring, which gradually transitioned into competent Stockton Formation bedrock. This is consistent with a geophysical investigation designed to investigate bedrock water-bearing fractures beneath the site at Area C (U.S. Geological Survey 2008). Area C was divided by the U.S. Geological Survey into shallow and deep hydrogeologic units. The shallow unit is comprised of sandstone. The deep hydrogeologic unit is defined as water-bearing bedrock beneath the shallow hydrogeologic unit, and typically exhibits artesian conditions (Batelle 2015). Consistent with Area C, lithologic boring data and the depths groundwater was encountered in monitoring wells HN-107 S/l, HN-108 S/l, and HN-109 S/l suggest confined to semi confined conditions. Generally, the lithology identified was highly weathered from the surface until approximately 55 to 77 feet bgs. Finer grained materials (siltstone and mudstone) were identified above the more permeable sandstone units and fractures. Groundwater was purged using dedicated, high-density, polyethylene tubing that was discarded after each sample was collected. Groundwater was extracted using a stainless steel submersible pump that was decontaminated before each use with distilled water and Alconox detergent. Monitoring wells were purged continuously until water quality parameters (pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity) stabilized. Once parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected for analysis in clean, laboratory-supplied, PFC-free, high-density polyethylene bottles. A blind duplicate and a field blank were collected using laboratory-certified, PFC-free, deionized water. Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate samples were collected and analyzed at a rate of one per 20 samples. Samples were packaged with ice in a cooler, and shipped via laboratory courier under chain-of-custody to Accutest Laboratories of Orlando, Florida (Attachment 2). Samples were analyzed for PFCs using EPA Method 537 modified for environmental media. Data validation was completed by the Resolution Project Chemist. The data were found to be valid as reported and suitable for decision-making purposes. The data validation report is provided in this document as Attachment 3. 3.0 RESULTS There are no screening levels for PFCs in soil, however, constituents of interest were not detected above the laboratory detection limits in soil samples with the exception of SB7. The sample collected from SB7 at 0.5 feet bgs had an estimated (J) PFOS concentration (6.040 J pg/kg). The concentration of PFOS in the accompanying blind duplicate of SB7 was below the detection limit for all analytes. Analytical results from eight of the nine soil samples collected during this investigation were below reporting limits for all six PFC analytes. Analytical results from the soil investigation are summarized in Table 2. Concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in the groundwater samples collected on 16 April 2015 were below their respective EPA PHA in all monitoring wells sampled except PFOS in HN-1081. PFOS detected in the groundwater samples collected from HN-1081 (0.236 pg/L) exceeded the PHA for PFOS (0.2 pg/L). Detectable concentrations of PFOS and PFOA were reported in all groundwater samples collected except in those obtained from HN-108S. 3 April 2016 US00008224 RESOLUTION CONSULTANTS Resolution Consultants A J o in t Venture ofAECO M & EnSafe 510 Carnegie Center Princeton, New Jersey, 08540 Concentrations of PFOA were higher than PFOS in all samples collected except HN-1081. The highest concentration of PFOA was detected in monitoring well HN-1091 (0.0718 pg/L), which is below the PHA of 0.4 pg/L. The most common detection of the four additional analyzed PFCs without PHAs was PFHxS, which was reported in all of the groundwater samples. The highest concentration of PFHxS was detected in monitoring well HN-1081 (0.134 pg/L). The concentration of all analytes were below their respective detection limits in all field blanks, collected each day of sampling. Analytical results from the groundwater investigation are summarized in Table 3. 4 April 2016 US00008225 4.0 REFERENCES Battelle. 2015. Final Sampling and Analysis (SAP) Plan. October. Department of Defense (DOD). 2011. Internal Navy Correspondence on Perfluorinated Compounds Clarification. Tetra Tech. 2014. Evaluation of Potential Sources of Perfluorinated Compounds, Former Naval Warfare Center Warminster, Pennsylvania. -- 2011. Third Five-Year Report, Former Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2009. Provisional Health Advisories for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS). -- 2010. Region I. Low Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the Collection of Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells. -- 2014. Emerging Contaminants - Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Fact Sheet. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2008. Interpretation of Borehole Geophysical Logs at Area C, Former Naval Air Warfare Center, Warminster Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, 2007. Open-File Report 2008-1207. US00008226 FIGURES t 6 I \ US00008227  o D 0 [ ] FIGURES O o o. o O' o o a o; o o Q D US00008228 HN-108 Depth PFOS: PFOA: 1.3 H < 25 U 3 ft < 9.9 U < 20 U Depth PFOS: PFOA: 0.5 ft 6.04 J < 22 U 1ft <10U < 20 U Depth PFOS: PFOA: 0.S ft. <10U < 20 U 7 ft < 8.6 U < 17 U N [~Parcel 2 j Depth 0.3 ft 8.5 ft PFOS: < 12 U < 11U ^ PFOA: < 24 U < 21 U [~=arr.eiT| %"* / / AICOM Map Location Legend Soil Boring -V Monitoring Well Drawn: BC 8/6/2015 Approved: PJ 8/6/2015 Project#: 60276503 C3 V ,/ / : J Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) Site Boundary l_ I Site Parcel Boundaries W:\Govt\Projects\NavyCLEAN AECOM-EnSafe; JV\Warminster\GIS\Maps\Shenandoah Woods Soil Results Map - 20150602.mxd J - Estimated Concentration U - indicates not detected above reporting detection limit ft - Feet A FIGURE 1 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS MARCH 2015 SHENANDOAH WOODS NAWC WARMINSTER BUCKS COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA ----- -- I Parce;11 AZCOM Map Location Legend * r Monitoring Wells Drawn: BC Approved: PJ 6/2/2015 6/2/2015 -* . 1___ 1Site Parcel Boundaries Projeci #: 60276503 W:\Projects\Navy CLEAN AECOM-EnSafe JV\Warminster\GIS\Maps\Shenanetoah Woods GW Results Map.mxd - 20150602.mxd Notes: PFOS/PFOA results reported in truorograms per liter (pig/L) PFOS - Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, PFOA - Perfluorooctanoic acid j - Estimated Concentration U - Indicates not detected above reporting detection limit ft - Feet USEPA Preliminary Health Advisory Levels PFOS - 0.2 pg/L. PFOA - 0,4 pg/L 0 A FIGURE 2 GROUNDWATER RESULTS APRIL 2015 SHENANDOAH WOODS NAWC WARMINSTER BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TABLES  o o o o o o TABLES O o o D O . O o o o US00008232 CUD Table 1 Well Construction Summary NAWC Warminster CUD dZ [ 1 (ZZ (ZD (ZZ ZZI Well HN-107S HN-1071 HN-108S HN-1081 HN-109S HN-1091 Total Depth (ft bgs) 65 100 65 100 32 85 Screened interval (ft) 45-65 90-100 45-65 90-100 22-32 75-85 ft bgs feet below ground surface ft msl feet above mean sea level Elevation (ft amsl) 346.42 346.43 380.08 379.98 347.35 347.37 Mount Flush Flush Flush Installed Mar-15 Mar-15 Mar-15 US00008233 Table 2 PFC Investigation - April 2015 Validated Results Summary Sample ID NAWC Warminster - Shenandoah Wood|amp|e Sl-0.8_03232015 HN-107 - 0.8 ft Sample Date 3/23/2015 Sampled Delivery Group FA23101 S2-0.8_03232015 HN-109 - 0.8 ft 3/23/2015 FA23101 S-DUP_03242015 SB-2 3/24/2015 FA23101 S3-1.5_03232015 S4-8.5_03232015 S5-1.0_03232015 SB-1 - 1.5 ft SB-1 - 8.5 ft SB-2 - 1.0 ft 3/23/2015 3/23/2015 3/23/2015 FA23101 FA23101 FA23101 S6-7_03242015 HN-107 - 7 ft 3/ 24/ 2O1I5 FA23101 S7-0.5JB242015 SB-2 - 0.5 ft 3/24/2015 FA23101 S8-3_03242015 SB-1 - 3 ft 3/24/2015 FA23101 Chemical Name Perfluorobutanesulfonic Acid (PFBS) Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA) Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid (PFHxS) Perfluorononanoic Add (PFNA) Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) CAS 375-73-5 375-85-9 355-46-4 375-95-1 1763-23-1 335-67-1 Units pq/Kg pq/Kq pq/Kq pq/Kq pq/Kq pq/Kq < 12 U < 12 U < 12 U < 12 U < 12 U < 24 U < 10 U < 10 U < 10 U < 10 U < 10 U < 20 U < 11 U < 11 U < 11 U < 11 U < 11 U < 22 < 12 U < 12 U < 12 U < 12 U < 12 U < 25 U < 11 U < 11 U < 11 U < 11 U < 11 U < 21 U < 10 U < 10 U < 10 U < 10 U < 10 U < 20 U t < 8.6 U 1 < 11 U < 8.6 U ! < 11 U < 8.6 U < 11 U < 8.6 U < 11 U < 8.6 U 1 6.04 J < 17 U 1 < 22 U < 9.9 U < 9.9 U < 9.9 U < 9.9 U < 9.9 U < 20 U Chemical Name Perfluorobutanesulfonic Acid (PFBS) Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA) Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid (PFHxS) Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA) Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Sample ID EB-032315 Sample Date 3/23/2015 Sampled Delivery Group FA23101 CAS Units 375-73-5 pg/L < 0.015 U 375-85-9 pq/L < 0.015 U 355-46-4 375-95-1 pg/L pg/L < 0.015 U < 0.015 U 1763-23-1 335-67-1 pg/L < 0.015 U ___ 2/L___ < 0.031 U FB-032315 3/23/2015 FA23101 < 0.016 U < 0.016 U < 0.016 tl < 0.016 U < 0.016 U < 0.032 U FB-032415 3/24/2015 FA23101 < 0.015 U < 0.015 U < 0.015 U < 0.015 U < 0.015 U < 0.031'U Notes: CAS Chemical Abstracts Service Number U indicates not detected above reporting detection limit J indicates estimated value ft feet pg/Kg micrograms per kilogram pg/L micrograms per liter ! j it 1 1 1 i Table 3 PFC Investigation - April 2015 Validated Results Summary NAWC Warminster - Shenandoah Woods Chemical Name Perfluorobutanesulfonic Acid (PFBS) Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA) Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid (PFHxS) Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA) Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Chemical Name Perfluorobutanesulfonic Acid (PFBS) Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA) Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid (PFHxS) Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA) Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) CAS 375-73-5 375-85-9 355-46-4 375-95-1 1763-23-1 335-67-1 Sample ID Location Screen Interval Sample Date Sampled Delivery Group EPA Health Units Advisory Level pg/L NA pg/L NA pg/L NA pg/L pg/L NA 0.2 _______ y2/L_______ 0.4 HN-107I_04162015 HN-107I 90-100 4/16/2015 FA23700 < 0.015 U < 0.015 U 0.0398 < 0.015 U 0.0266 0.0605 HN-107S.04162015 HN-108IJM172015 HN-108SJM172015 HN-107S HN-108I HN-108S 45-65 90-100 45-65 4/16/2015 4/17/2015 4/17/2015 FA23700 FA23700 FA23700 < 0.015 U 0.00862 J 0.0444 < 0.015 U 0.0337 0.0711 0.0353 0.0259 0.134 < 0.015 U 0.236 0.0276 J 0.0664 < 0.017 U 0.0131 J < 0.017 U < 0.017 U < 0.033 U CAS 375-73-5 375-85-9 355-46-4 375-95-1 1763-23-1 335-67-1 Sample ID Location Screen Interval Sample Date Sampled Delivery Group EPA Health Units Advisory Level pg/L NA pg/L ' NA pg/L NA pg/L pg/L _______ uaZk_______ NA 0.2 0.4 HN-109S_04162015 HN-109S 22-32 4/16/2015 FA23700 0.0413 < 0.017 U 0.0275 < 0.017 U 0.0145 J 0.0432 DUP-041615 HN-109S 22-32 4/16/2015 FA23700 H N -1 09IJM 1 62015 HN-109I 75-85 4/16/2015 FA23700 0.0414 < 0.016 U 0.0262 < 0.016 U 0.0134 J 0.0412 0.0448 < 0.017 U 0.0494 < 0.017 U 0.0277 0.0718 FB-041615 4/16/2015 FA23700 < 0.016 U < 0.016 U < 0.016 U < 0.016 U < 0.016 U < 0.032 U FB-041715 t 4/17/2015 FA23700 < 01015 U < 01015 U < 01015 U < 01015 U < 01015 U < 01031 U Notes: CAS Chemical Abstracts Service Number U indicates not detected above reporting detection limit J indicates estimate value EPA Environmental Protection Agency Gray shading indicate exceedance of EPA Health Advisory Level pg/L micrograms per liter Screen Interval is expressed in feet below ground surface A ttachm ents ) I .1 US00008236 1 \ \ US00008237 o G. . 0D 0 0 ATTACHMENT 1 0 D 0 0 0 0 0D 0 D US00008238 o D D O O D O D O D D O O O O O D O LocationSketch ^ -- North\ Client: Department of the Navy Project Number: 60276503 \I Duplexes | Site Location: NAWC Warminster, PA Coordinates: 2751877.177 326037.182 Drilling Method: HN-107S/I Sample Type(s): Air Rotary/Percussion Split Spoon Weather: Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contractor: RAAB (Rick Raab) GS Elevation: 346.7 a * * H N -1 0 7 S /I TOC Elevation: 346.42/346.43 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete:_____ 3/27/2015 Water level: 1 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 1 ft./56 ft./76 ft. Q. oCD 5 CL Q. E wCD 6 S1 o5 CO s2 > 3 4 S' CD E ? O CL Q . c/5 Q 9 CO Q. 3 Description Cleared to 5 ft. bgs. via vacuum truck and hand auger. CD 5c ou S 2 CD O CO O Concrete Q. E o= "ro a) 5 Q<u 0.0 CL 0 to 4.5 ft. bgs,: SILTY CLAY with GRAVEL (CL); brown and dark brown; c la y . Sr oe (85%); sand and gravel (5-10%), angular; trace silt; high plasticity; soft; septic odor; jq debris (plastic and cement); wet to saturated at 1.2 ft. 1 Q. S1-0.8 collected 1143 5 o.o Silt- 5 to 7 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dark reddish-brown; 6 stone decomposed/intensely weathered; soft; saturated. 7 0.0 Silt- 7 to 9 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); reddish-brown; intensely weathered; 2 in. PVC soft; iron oxide banding and lamination; micaceous; bottom 4 in. competent riser 8 stone sandstone; saturated to 8 ft. grading to dry. . 0.0 9 NR S4-8.5 collected 1340 10 . 11 _ 12. 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 17 18 . 19 _ 20 Silt- 15 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dull reddish-brown; moderately to slightly weathered; dry. stone Hydrated bentonite grout 20 ft. bgs.: Same as above; dry. US00008239 0 0 D 0 0 0 0D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LocationSketch fc- .......... ..-- North \ Client: Department of the Navy Project Number: 60276503 iI v _ ... Duplexes | Site Location: NAWC Warminster, PA Coordinates: 2751877.177 326037.182 Drilling Method: HN.107S/I Sample Type(s): Air Rotary/Percussion Split Spoon Weather: Clear 30-40's F . Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contractor: RAAB (R ick Raab) GS Elevation: 346.7 .Bering: H N -1 0 7 S /I TOC Elevation: 346.42/346.43 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water level: 2 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 1 ft./56 ft./76 ft. Q. Q. E( (O O o$ CD 21 22 23 24 Ea Q. o Q. O5 O 3 Description 10 in. steel casing set at 20 ft. bgs. Boring diameter reduced to 8.25 in. Siltstone 23 ft. lags.: Same as above; dry. CcoO2 o35 3co o WJ O a a. oE O .2 =O *^03 gQ 25 . 26 27 . 28 . 29 . 30 31 . 25 ft bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); gray; fine-grained; moderately weathered SS to fresh; hard; micaceous; dry. 27 ft. bgs,: Same as above, argillaceous SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); moderately weathered; dry. Hydrated bentonite grout SS/ Siltstone 32 . 33. 34 . 35 . 36 37 _ 38 _ 39 _ 40 ,v` vf.ii SS y / : >N. m* ,t f'<( ''A 35 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); buff/tan; fine-grained; moderately hard; fresh to moderately weathered; dry. 35 ft tfb i/t i Im g SS 40 ft. bgs.: Same as above; dry. Hydrated bentonite 1/2 in. TR30 leiacKi D US00008240 G LocationSketch Client; Department of the Navy - S' Ncxth'y Project Number: 60276503 Boring: H N -1 0 7 S /I D (V Duplexes | Site Location: NAWC Warminster, PA Coordinates: 275187?. 177 326037.182 TOC Elevation: 346.42/346.43 Sheet: 3 of 5 Drilling Method: Air Rotary/Percussion Well Installed: Dual nested HN-107S/1 Sample Type(s): Split Spoon Boring Diameter: 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: 45-65/90-100 D Weather: Clear 30-40's F Drilling Contractor: RAAB (R ick Raab) Logged By: G. Richards Start Date: GS Elevation: 346,7 Date Complete: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: 3/27/2015 Water level: 100 1 ft./56 ft./76 ft. 0) 5c 0 Description o 3o CL. E 3 2c <0 o 5= '&ra CD WO $o 0 Hydrated bentonite 1/2 in. 0 TR30 SIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 ft. 45 ft. bgs.: SILTY SANDSTONE (Stockton F m ); tan; fine-grained; moderately hard; moderately weathered; dry to slightly wet. #1 Silica sand 45 ft. 51 ft. bgs.: Same as above; wet. 54 ft. bgs.: Same as above; dry to slightly wet. 0.01 in. slotted screen Use air from drill rig to blow out boring. Very little water. 54 to 56 ft. bgs,: SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dry, becoming saturated at 56 ft. 0 2 in. PVC riser UeiUM D US00008241 o US00008242 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 Location S ketch ......... ..-- ~~ North \ Client: Department o f the Navy Project Number: 60276503 (I V ... Duplexes ' | Site Location: ' - Coordinates: NAW C W arm inster. PA 2751877.177 326037.182 Drilling Method: HN-107S/I Sam ple Type(s): A ir Rotary/Percussion Split Spoon W eather Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling C ontractor RAAB (R ick Raab) GS Elevation: 346.7 *** HN-107S/I TO C Elevation: 346.42/346.43 Sheet: W ell Installed: Boring Diameter: I0in./8,25in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth o f Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 W ater level: 5 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 1 ft./56 ft./76 ft. o a o$ 8 0 81. 82. 83 84 85. 86 . 87 88 89. 90 91 _ < zo 92 _ Description co JD Q. E Q J '3 E 3= --<D`caot a 80 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE/MUDSTONE (Stockton Pm.); hard; cuttings return as clay. Siltstone 85 ft. bgs.: Same as above. Hydrated bentonite 1/2 in. TR30 T-r 90 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE/SHAIE (Stockton Fm.j; dark gray; hard. -= r<K - r fi 88 ft. #1 Silica sand 90 ft. 93 _ 94 _ 95 _ 96 _ 97 _ 98_ 99 _ 95 ft. bgs.: Same as above; fracture; 6 in. drop of hammer; saturated; high yield. 0.01 in. Slotted*" screen 76 to 100 ft. bgs.: high yield. 100 Legend: [ X l split spoon sample Air rotary/ * 'percussion V 7 First observed groundwater PID Photoionization detect' TD=100 ft. bgs. Approximately 1000 gallons of water contained. in. Inches Prepared in accordance with: 100 ft. USCS Unified soil classification system ppm Parts per million . TD Total depth Fm. Formation Engineering Geology Field Manual, 2nd Edition. D2487 Practice for Classification of Soils (USCS). . ft. Feet bgs. Below ground surface SS Sandstone SH Shale D2488 Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (VisualManual Procedure). PVC Polyvinyl chloride TOC Top of casing CalTrans Soil and Rock Logging, Classification, and TR30 Time release 30 minutes GS Ground surface Presentation Manual 2010 Edition NR No recovery US00008243 0 0 0 0 D 0 LocationSketch Client: Department of the Navy Bristol Rd. North^y Project Number: 60276503 II gate I I Site Location: Coordinates: NAWC Warminster, PA 2754688.937 327115.265 Sc Drilling Method: Air Rotary c O HN-108S/I Sample Type(s): NA Weather: Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contractor: RAAB (Rick Raab) GS Elevation: 380.25 Boring: H N -1 0 8 S /I TOC Elevation: 380.08/379.98 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water level: 1 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 55 o Q. o O E5 E a o. g aO Description 0o 0 3 Cleared to 5 ft. bgs. via vacuum truck and hand auger. <D 5c o S S2 a(0 o 0O Concrete O Q. o 4? = '(0 a) 5 <u Q Not logged or sampled. 1 ft. 0 0 0 D 10 . 11 12. 0 13 . 14 . 15 . 0 16 . 17 0 18 . 0 19 _ 20 x> CO ML 7 ft. bgs.: SILT (ML); overburden; reddish-brown; nonplastic; dense; fragments of siltstone; soft drilling; dry. 2 in. PVC riser Soil-rock contact. No transition zone o f decomposed rock. SS 10 ft. bgs.: Argillaceous SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); reddish-brown; fine-grained; hard; weathered, heavily oxidized; dry. a am rumi Silt- 13 ft. bgs.: SANDY SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dull red; soft; dry. stone Hydrated bentonite grout SS 17 ft. bgs.: Arkosic SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); reddish-brown, fresh surface is blue-gray; medium-grained; hard; weathered, oxidized; micaceous; dry. 20 ft. bgs.: Same as above. 10 in. Steel casing-gnu D US00008244 0 0 0 0 0. 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 koaftopSketcft \ Bristol Rd. North \ Client: Department of the Navy Project Number: 60276503 II gate I I Site Location: Coordinates: NAWC Warminster, PA 2754686.937 327115.265 5 C Drilling Method: c O HN-108S/I Sample Type(s): Air Rotary NA Weather: Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contrae:tor: RAAB (R ick Raab) GS Elevation: 380.25 Boring: H N -108S/T TOC Elevation: 380.08/379.98 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in./8,25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water Level: 2 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 55 O 03 . Q. E(0 CO 21 . 22 o o E Q. _j g a COO C3O Description MM* 10 in. Steel casing set at 20 ft. bgs. Boring diameter reduced to 8.25 in. o> 5c 03 I I'os o Q. E O .(20 (0 o CO o 5 ooe 23 _ 24 SS 23 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); tan to light brown; very fine-grained; medium hard; cuttings return as fine dust; dry. 25 26 . 27 . 28 . 29 30 31 _ 32 . 33 _ 34 . 35 . 36 _ 37 _ 38 _ Hydrated bentonite grout SS 28 ft. bgs.: Arkosic SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); orange tan and light brown; medium to fine-grained; hard; moderately weathered; trace micas; slightly moist to dry. Silt- 30 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dull red; soft; dry. stone 2 in. PVC riser SS/ 30 to 40 ft. bgs.: Interbedded SANDSTONE and SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dull red; weathered; hard; dry. Silt- stone 39 _ 40 US00008245 0 D 0 0 D 0 D D 0 0 D0 0 D 0 0 leaSa-Steta \ Bristol Rd. North \ Client; Department of the Navy Project Number: 60276503 II gate I I Site Location: Coordinates: NAWC Warminster, PA 2754686.937 327115.265 3? c <8> Drilling Method: Air Rotary oi HN-108S/I Sample Type(s): NA Weather: Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contrat;tor: RAAB (R ick Raab) GS Elevation: 380.25 Boring: H N -1 0 8 S /I TOC Elevation: 380.08/379.98 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in/8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water Level: 3 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 55 g. 41 . 42 _ <D O oe Q. ECO CO 43 44 _ 45 46 47 . 48 49 . 50 _ 51 _ 52. 53. 54 _ 55 . 56 _ 57 _ 58 _ 59 _ 60 E Q. CO 9 O CO Q. 3 Description 40 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dark red; fine grained; moderate to heavily weathered; micaceous; dry. urn''> SS L.**" * Hdnim--* o c BCO cO co O oe a. E OB -- CO oes Q Hydrate? bentonite grout iMaMMnw 45 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); strong brown; fine grained; hard; micaceous; fractured; slightly wet. SS 47 ft. bgs,: Same as above; wet. Silt- 48 ft. bgs.: SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); wet. stone Clay- 50 ft. bgs.: CLAYSTONE (Stockton Fm.); strong brown; wet. stone SS Slightly fractured SANDSTONE above 55 ft. cuttings wet with silt/mud. 2 in. PVC riser 48 ft. Hydrated bentonite 1/2 in. TR30 r-T 55 ft. bgs: Arkosic SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm); orangish brown; medium grained; medium hard; saturated. 55 ft SS/ nterbedded SANDSTONE and SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.); hard; cuttings return as brown sandy silt; hard drilling, slow; fractured with high yield. Siltstone 0.01 in. Slotted screen #1 Silica Sand ~~ m um tsm a. US00008246  0 D 0 D D 0 D D 0D D Location S ketch Bristol Rd. North^ Client: Department of the Navy Project Number: 60276503 II gate I I Site Location: Coordinates: NAWC Warminster, PA 2754686.937 327115.265 a? c Drilling Method: Oc HN-108S/I Sample Type(s): Air Rotary NA Weather: Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contractor: RAAB (Rick Raab) GS Elevation: 380.25 Boring: H N -1 0 8 S /I TOC Elevation: 380.08/379.98 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water Level: 4 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 55 0) sa Q. E 8 61 . 62 63 E aQ. _9J le V) 9 o. 2 o (O a. O 3 Description 60 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.}; brown; arkosic; medium-grained; saturated; water less turbid/clear. ss 63 ft. bgs.: Fracture; hammer drop. <D 5c i*o3S3 CO 5 3S CO o co O Q. E o=o 3"t a> 5 Qcd 0.01 in. Slotted screen 64 65 66 67 . 68 . 69 . 70 _ 71 . 72 . 79 . 74 . 75 . 76 . 77 _ 78 . 79 _ 80 SS 65 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); orangish brown; lost water; fracture. SS 68 ft. bgs.: Same as above; hard. xL 'r-'S No return cuttings/contained; very soft; advance 12 ft. in 1 minute. 72. ft. bgs.: No cuttings; very soft. 65 ft #1 Sand 66 ft. H= =t * -t I 4 4 q Hydrated bentonite *=> 1/2 in. H s TR30 d Mud 75 to 80 ft. bgs.: Interbedded MUDSTONE and SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); hard; saturated, high yield. Stone H H =i SS 77 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); maroon-red; very fine-grained; heavily weathered; micaceous. Mud Stone 79 ft. bgs.: MUDSTONE (Stockton Fm ); soft; cuttings return as mud; saturated with high yield. r=CrO|f- H---2 in. PVC riser . d mf US00008247 o o D O O O o o o o o o D O O Location Sketch Bristol Rd. North\^ Client: Department of the Navy Project Number: 60276503 Weather II gate I I Site Location: Coordinates: NAWC Warminster, PA 2754686.937 327115.265 5C <8> Drilling Method: Air Rotary oc HN-108S/ Sample Type(s): NA Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contractor RAAB (Rick Raab) GS Elevation: 380.2S Boring: H N -108S/I TOC Elevation: 380.08/379.98 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter: 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water Level: 5 of 5 Dual nested 45-65/90-100 100 55 O E<0) $o CO 81. 82 83 84 85 86 . 87 88 . 89 90 . 91 _ < o Z 92 . 93, 94, 95 . 96 . 97 . 98 . "_ g Q. ? UCO CL 3 Description SH 81 ft. bgs.: SHALE (Stockton Fm.); dark grayish-brown; hard. II (COOOo 2 in. PVC riser -- U = '5 Sr rpix Hydrated bentonite 1/2 in. TR30 SS 85 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dark blue-gray; very fine-grained; hard; micaceous; saturated. Clay- stone 86ft. bgs.: CLAYSTONE (Stockton Fm.); reddish-brown; thinly bedded. tPilttMM*" tlHIWHOMH SS 87 ft. bgs,: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); light-gray; fine and medium-grained; appears to be alternating thinly bedded; red SILTSTONE with blue-gray SANDSTONE; saturated. MtHMHtllW" XMtMUMH 88 ft. #1 Silica Sand 90 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm ); blue-gray; fine and medium-grained; hard; saturated. 90 ft. Hammer bouncing; competent; hard; advancing -1ft./minute. 7*r T-F 95 ft. bgs.: Same as above; competent SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); micaceous; saturated. 0.01 in. Slotted screen SS/ Silt- 97 ft. bgs.: tnterbedded SANDSTONE and thin bedded SILTSTONE (Stockton Fm.). stone 100 Legend. * C X l split spoon sample ^iir rotary/ percussion V First observed groundwater PID Photoionization detector TD s 1Qft. bgs. in. Inches USCS Unified soil classification system ppm Parts per million ft. Feet bgs. Below ground surface PVC Polyvinyl chloride TD Total depth Fm. Formation SS Sandstone SH Shale TOC Top of casing TR30 Time release 30 minutes NR No recovery__________________ GS Ground surface Prepared in accordance with: 100 ft. Engineering Geology Field Manual, 2nd Edition. D2487 Practice for Classification of Soils (USCS). D2488 Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual Manual Procedure). CaJTrans Soil and Rock Logging, Classification, and Presentation Manual2010 Edition US00008248 D 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 D 0 0D LocationSketch Client: Department of the Navy North\^ Project Num ber 60276503 ( Duplexes | Site Location: NAWC Warminster, PA Coordinates: 2751688.399 325998.153 Drilling Method: Air Rotary/Percussion ^ H N -1 0 9 S /I Sample Type(s): Split Spoon Weather: Clear 30-40's F Logged By: G. Richards Drilling Contractor: RAAB (Rick Raab) GS Elevation: 347.63 Boring: H N -1 0 9 S /I TOC Elevation: 347.35/347.37 Sheet: Well Installed: Boring Diameter 10 in./8.25 in. Screen: Start Date: 3/23/2015 Depth of Boring: Date Complete: 3/27/2015 Water Level: 3 of 5 Dual nested 22-32/75-85 100 2ft./18 ft./50 ft. OCl OO Q. 5E oCD W CD 41 42 43 44 45 o E SoZ CL Q. g a CO Cz>O Description o C *3 Oo ri c (D O CO o3 ex E 0 1oe 5Q SS/ 40 ft, bgs.: interbedded SANDSTONE and CLAYSTONE (Stockton Fm.); dark blue -H - grey; hard; contains quartzite; cuttings also return as mud, nonplastic fines; little SH water, drying. Hydrated bentonite r-f-A 3 1/2 In. TR30 -1 * --1 H - No cuttings from 42 to 49 to 35 ft. bgs. ! 2 H TT TT 46 . 47 . 48 . 49 . a1oe0 50 . o Q. <Q- 51 _ 'S 52 _ 53 _ 54 . SS 50 ft. bgs.: SANDSTONE (Stockton Fm.); fine to medium grained; quartz rich; medium hard; saturated. ! w-o 1 = mi H= Sr * 2 a- 4 ? 1 * 3 55 _ 56 _ S S 55 ft. bgs.: Same as above; water bearing fracture; oxidation on surfaces. M* 57 . 58 . 59 _ Claystone 5? ft. bgs.: CLAYSTONE (Stockton Fm.); strong brown; cuttings return as mud. Saturated. 58 ft. bgs.: Fracture, small drop in hammer. i, 1 60 D US00008249 US00008250 o o D a o o o O o o o D O O O O O O, o ATTACHMENT 2 US00008251 00 D a Q Q D a0 0 D 0 D 0 0 a 0 0 GROUNDWATER LOW-STRESS PURGE AND SAMPLING DATA Project Name: Project Location: Well Number: NAWC Warminster Warminster, PA HN-107 Shallow Project No.: Weather: Sampler: 60276503 5V ? o \ PURGING AND SAMPLING DEVICE Pump Type and Model: Tubing Diameter and Material: ^ / 5 o 9 jp /fD ?ir Decontamination Procedure: Well Previously Sampled: A WELL INFORMATION Well Diameter (in.): ______ o? ^_____________________ Depth to Bottom (ft., TOC): Initial Depth to Water (ft., TOC): 3 f ______________ Screen! Interval (ft., bgs): INDICATOR PARAMETER MONITORING Pump Set at Depth (ft., TOC): ,fL f. Time: Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): 3S o Volume Purged (liters) (A Parameter and Stabilization Range* Temp. (C) 3% pH SC (m mhos) DO* (mg/L) 0.1 3% 10% if >1 .^ ORP (mv) 10 mv Turbidity (NTU) 10% TDS none Color/odor none Time: f$ o f/5 l c h i* -io Soo & -II s arso c m ICC-Hi 16o 7.S 7 .4 9.5 T-.o il O Sfi f)5a Vc*$o i z o MS f i s i ia*r ad h i. 35 li.V i, !>. / a .io /i.f 7.1 1 T.cH o .m t .L X VkAc r i oS m f l,a(o ?X'6 7.oS c r M * .foS: .0 rC i\< % 7 IO :fuir /*.( I HAlh 7. io 7 (0 /..re 1 B .m i iU ? 33 - 3 -75 -h r a. 7 3 - ir t S cm L i**- r ckCi' 7*991 W c f i i f c/o-C MV a i3 ;/..3 -4 4 46 ' 2 ? O* oi t.n -a$r 4/o .i4 -3 0 omx *w f i& f. e-i<+-c Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): Parameter and Stabilization Range* pH (std units) 0.1 Conductivity (m mhos) 3% Turbidity (NTU) 10% DO* (mg/L) Temp. (C) 10% N/A ORP (mv) 10 mv * Stabilization requires three consecutive readings within the range indicated. Once the well is stabilized, the sample may be collected. DO is the key indicator parameter for VOC analyses; turbidity is the key indicator parameter for all other analyses. Sample: Comments/Analytes: Sample time: Z 7 - lo o 5 D y i . ' US00008252 GROUNDWATER LOW-STRESS PURGE AND SAMPLING DATA Project Name: Project Location: NAWC Warminster Warminster, PA Project No.: 60276503 Weather: Date: T--Mf--i-------- Well Number: HN-107 Intermediate Sampler: PURGING AND SAMPLING DEVICE Pump Type and Model: 5 5 ^ Decontamination Procedure: J f t - l Tubing Diameter and Material: WELL INFORMATION _ Well Previously Sampled: J it-- (any Well Diameter (in.): _________ S _________ ;___________ Depth to Bottom (ft., TOC): Initial Depth to Water (ft., TOC): Screened Interval (ft., bgs): *70- /CZ> INDICATOR PARAMETER MONITORING Pump Set at Depth (ft., TOC). Time: / ( V f / a tOO lobS u*io t0*{$ tofo 'toSS fioCi Purge Rate (mL/tnln): ?ifo t^SO -06 Depth to W ater (ft.): Volume Purged (liters) /&& ti.iO 3.5* i t<o,tO f&.e, fio l t&.o*/ 5 t /O.Cs Parameter and Stabilization Range* Temp. (C) 3% /%ek ( 3 M .It i3,Z* n,3% 3.3 [ pH 0.1 SC (m mhos) 3% Id i.... l . i f Or&O e>.7i% f . r ? t j r %d* 0.fcl3 tn- O.Gfsf DO* (mg/L) 10% if >1 IAS 2.1Y A I f / . # h * i [.T? I-13 ORP (mv) 10 mv ~3L_ -/ - 5 / - 5 ? - 5 a Turbidity (NTU) TDS Color/odor 10% none none w tr.o y-.y- HA S ).o a . \ a .v 0HS* O.HHT HI o*ho *3*2- My* e.Hbr /)W - fie*-*' de*f iie*C Time: Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): Parameter and Stabilization Range* pH (std units) 0.1 Conductivity (m mhos) 3% Turbidity (NTU) 10% DO* (mg/L) 10 % Temp. (C) N/A ORP (mv) lOmv * Stabilization requires three consecutive readings within the range indicated. Once the well is stabilized, the sample may be collected. DO is the key indicator parameter for VQC analyses; turbidity is the key indicator parameter for all other analyses. Sample: tf/^' Sample time: (<$5______ _____________________________________ Comments/Analytes: JhUHU JUUJjL DTU./ US00008253 GROUNDWATER LOW-STRESS PURGE AND SAMPLING DATA Project Name: NAWC Warminster _ Project No.: 60276503_________ Date: M ~ n - Z o i g Project Location: Warminster, PA _ Weather: L T , R/V.UO_____________________ __ Well Number: HN-108 Shallow Sampler: P c ____________ ._________________ PURGING AND SAMPLING DEVICE yPump typeand Model: SS M ^ mS qom Tubing Diameter and Material: 3L WELL INFORMATION -- " Well Diameter (in.): ______________ 2 ______ Initial Depth to Water (ft., TOC): ZZH M _ Decontamination Procedure: _________ Well Previously Sampled: H u - y o v c r H -li-iy Depth to Bottom (ft., TOC): Screened Interval (ft.'bgs): 4>^ow INDICATOR PARAMETER MONITORING Pump Set at Depth (ft, TOC): ie>0 ` Time: l o g fHZ-S nM3 Purge Rate (mL/min): V-Z'Sd 1^2 S /- .tir 6 +/12T0 y-'irc *4.2^ T^ZJ'4 Depth to W ater (ft.): 3o,* "iO.'Sb 3 L o t 3 I9 S - ,<n 7>LAS iZ. ll.OZ Volume Purged (liters) d \ . 4 7 . 1 l^ .'u $ .4= 1 \0.\ \ 1 Z 14 n LZ, Parameter and Stabilization Range* Temp. (C) . 3% rto s if AO H .% 1 \7,S1 fL S Viiiu I2M& 1 2 .11' pH . SC (m mhos) DO* (mg/L) 0.1 3% 10 % if >1 o .m 1 Z o,.%\ 6 *71 orzc, s x n 6.2.71 O Z U i #:1W G 13 7 1 C l a 6 S I G AS 6 O.Z7C 0 ZH(j >2kc >2 n.%b lb.^-3 <377 n s H q , . s s 4* 5M ORP (mv) 10 mv \x \ I'Sio ls n n m **i R O l* U Turbidity (NTU) TDS Color/odor 10% 4 \ 1 nsi m LT |G>1- t o t *3.7 * 0 .1 7 G . 7 none o m OAHI O-iMtS o.\so Q^o 3 l 3.1ST O.tSG 6 .IS* none wr CAe**^ cG*-- cXtu.'- Us*' c W ./^ C Liv<- Cvcv` Time: Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): Parameter and Stabilization Range* pH (std units) 0.1 Conductivity (m mhos) 3% Turbidity (NTU) 10% DO* (mg/L) 10 % Temp. (C) N/A ORP (mv) 10 mv * Stabilization requires three consecutive readings within the range indicated. Once the well is stabilized, th sample may be collected. DO is the key, indicator parameter for VOC analyses; turbidity is the key indicator parameter for all other analyses. Sample: M b ) t ) * ,s Sample time: \ 5 O Comments/Analytes: US00008254 GROUNDWATER LOW-STRESS PURGE AND SAMPLING DATA Project Name: Project Location: NAWC Warminster Warminster, PA Project No.: 60276503 Weather VX, Date: M - l 1 . Z c i V Well Number: HN-108 Intermediate Sampler: PURGING AND SAMPLING DEVICE Pump Type and Model: (V\ o t-j So ^ rv Tubing Diameter and Material: Vz,' < zhi'' Decontamination Procedure: Well Previously Sampled: V ICt U l k l O > V M - y _ Q WELL INFORMATION Well Diameter (in.): 3^' Depth to Bottom (ft., TOC): . \ OO o n Initial Depth to Water (ft., TOC): . I S Screened Interval (ft., bgs): INDICATOR PARAMETER MONITORING Pump Set at Depth (ft., TOC): Vc>x Time: t o \ r 16T io IS 1630 lOTS tOMO iHS i o r o to ST 1VO >Mr iti c. Purge Rate (mL/min): V-2SO +/-Z s c */-7So V i r o V .2 5 ^ - 5 0 V-2-50 y . z s */2S ^ZS Depth to W ater (ft.): is jr 3=tns v r . i ? ? v c i T n r V i n s SfllQ V .vS. T > V l K Volume Purgcd-(titcrg) cTri\yi cW--- cW C,k*-"1 C C-1*0- C U c / CACO***- Cte'*' Parameter and Stabilization Range* Temp. (C) 3% pH 0.1 SC (m mhos) 3% DO* (mg/L) 10% if >1 1 1 .6 T U 4 2 It 5)S" 12.01 IZ.oS" 1 2 0 1 12 M I l 2A \ x . v 12 ,2s 12,21 (e tiH b(j>H GUT G:V\ G.%<* G .4H 1 .0 2 . 1 to 1 tq I t s O i 1 ( , 0 .5 0 1 6 S o i o> n i .45-0 0 410 ,H i4 0 Ho** 5.402 0 .-3SS* b .242. 0 V 4 4 .1 * 3 S'V I 4 .1 s SLf, S lL 5 .M0 S .33 S,T L S ,2 3 ORP (mv) Turbidity (NTU) TDS -v-e. Coletfcdor 10 mv ( S I 10% 4m none O . t l t , none O Time: <2 S ' 12-3 i.5 I V ' H G s- 12. 1 i r v 3 . 3 (a .5 O.TLt D.llO 0 .2 4 3 .7/130 5 XU 1 .0 4 . r G -o 1 5 G o 5S S G M i 3 2 O O <S .c- O . O .G 2 O-LV? 0.2-94 0 .1S 2 0/5 O i? ..r fS V Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): Parameter and Stabilization Range* pH (std units) 0.1 Conductivity (m mhos) 3% Turbidity (NTU) 10% DO* (mg/L) 10 % Temp. (C) N/A ORP (mv) 10 mv collected. DO is the key indicator parameter for VOC analyses; turbidity is the key indicator parameter for all other analyses. Sample: V-tS - Sample time: m s: Comments/Analytes: ___ US00008255 GROUNDWATER LOW-STRESS PURGE AND SAMPLING DATA Project Name: NAWC Warminster Project No.: 60276503 Project Location: Warminster, PA Well Number: HN-109 Shallow PURGING AND SAMPLING DEVICE Weather: Sampler: * /* * * '__y . # /* Pump Type and Model: 6*) ________________ Decontamination Procedure: A . - J r K c A. Tubing Diameter and Material: Va" k/7< ``___________ Well Previously Sampled: WELL INFORMATION Well Diameter (in.): _________ ^ _____________________ Depth to Bottom (ft., TOC): 3 / , a/_____ Initial Depth to Water (ft., TOC): 3 0>_____________ Screened Interval (ft., bgs): - 5^ INDICATOR PARAMETER MONITORING Pump Set at Depth (ft., TOC): 3 Hp- Time: & > 0 m o \SSo tloQ >3(0 /3 / /3a* n x f Purge Rate (mL/min): il&O t i f o ^_ QcO Depth to W ater (ft.): Volume Purged (liters) Parameter and Stabilization Range* Temp. (C) 3% pH SC (m mhos) DO* (mg/L) 0.1 . 3% 10% if >1 HM 1 > ,0 i:o t ^1f W io lo.X f C J a L O -W* J2 V i o ,5 i XTfl x s n )cr:C,1 /(y & f J .fro affo -Z' /O M - y n * * i t o , ORP (mv) Turbidity (NTU) 10 mv r ii m 10% S' }&(? ./6 ? HX J / ? M / / TDS Color/odor none none Time: tk < .3fc O lC, 3 & 3 t f Je*f *~c C-e.J Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): Parameter and .... Stabilization Range* pH (std units) 0.1 Conductivity (m mhos) 3% Turbidity (NTU) 10% DO* (mg/L) 10% Temp. (C) N/A ORP (mv) 10 mv * Stabilization requires three consecutive readings within the range indicated. Once the well is stabilized, the sample may be collected. DO is the key indicator parameter for VOC analyses; turbidity is the key indicator parameter for all other analyses. Sample: Sample time: Comments/Analytes: ___________________________ US00008256 GROUNDWATER LOW-STRESS PURGE AND SAMPLING DATA Project Name: Project Location: NAWC Warminster Warminster, PA Project No.: 60276503 Weather: Date: *> --W-----r -/--r--------- Well Number: HN-109 Intermediate Sampler: ____ ...................... PURGING AND SAMPLING DEVICE Pump Type and Model: 6$ _______________ Decontamination Procedure: Tubing Diameter and Material; Yjl _ Well Previously Sampled: m a ______ :______________ WELL INFORMATION Well Diameter (in.): ___ 3 ' Initial Depth to Water (ft., TOC): Depth to Bottom (ft., TOC): Screened Interval (ft., bgs): "f2 S Az>?rS~ INDICATOR PARAMETER MONITORING Pump Set at Depth (ft., TOC): Time: t3S5 /Ho r Purge Rate (mL/min): ^ - f a n Uoo r fev tlOO - *}06 Depth to W ater (ft.): M 3 I iz&t i%(r1 i?M tu<, Volume Purged (liters) w &<5 hS 1 - f i3L Parameter and Stabilization Range* Temp. (C) pH SC (m mhos) 3% 0.1 3% B.CS. /a .65 fS-Co h a f a 6 hi (e 5.W 3 ,U\ DO* (mg/L) 10 % if >1 3 ,? 3.oC> f.-Sr? I . f i /. 5 d ORP(mv) Turbidity (NTU) TDS 1)1 Color/odor 1.0 mv 10% none none ~/o - / f f&.D k o 'n -3lO - a a - Q 3 * 1 l . o o .Q *'1 P.HfL oMSCf OHS* OAK cfeo.C cle.t-% Yet-c ' < c h f Time: i~ f" Purge Rate (mL/min): Depth to W ater (ft.): Parameter and Stabilization Range* pH (std units) Conductivity (m mhos) 0.1 3% Turbidity (NTU) 10% DO* (mg/L) 10% Temp. (C) N/A ORP (mv) 10 mv * Stabilization requires three consecutive readings within the range indicated. Once the well is stabilized, the sample may be collected. DO is the key indicator parameter for VOC analyses; turbidity is the key indicator parameter for all other analyses. Sample: Sample time: Comments/Analytes: US00008257 -- I CD I-- I Q I__I D I__i l __ I Q C=3 C D C D . c IL , A C C I_I TI EESST LABORATORIES Accutest Laboratories Southeast Chain of Custody 4405 Vineland Road, Suite C-l 5 Orlando, FI 32811 TEL. 407-425-6700 FAX: 407-425-0707 _________________________ www.accuicsJ.coin ACCUTEST JOB # : Accutest Quote # AECOM 125 Rock Road Project Name: Street NAWC Warminster r Horsham, PA 19044 Send results to: Patti Jannett oatti.iannettifiJaecom.com T y ....... .................................................................Stale----------------------- Warminster pa Project # 60276503 215-315-4325 ---- -- Fax# 2 x 5 - 1 1 y - i i i y t <5* * Samplers) Name(s) (Printed). Sampler 1: & U _ Sampler 2: Accutest Sample # Field ID / Point of Collection / f fO v - / < ? -- .. h o - / oe f S W ig J s -y '- * y Y / G ./.i................. ... WFU K 6n i_--o \\oG m %f^h, <ST : Client Purchase Order # . COLLECTION CONTAINER INFORMATION DATE TIME to trS 1i * # i t o S 037 V Uk W^` Inn|liiSS- /f1\cn1*6sSer>o SAMPLED BY: MATRIX '7 7 *7 -- 1 TOTAL OF BOTTLES BfV 3^ 6*3 ` (X 7X v X s % r w (r i "S T 2a i* AA o J NONE 1 NaCH H2S04 1 DI WATER 1 MEOH j 'W fk r*> Lx SJ M xk ' Xk ' . XXA/A PAGE 1 OF 1 SKIFF # t)w - unnkmg Water GW - Ground Water WW - Water SW - Surface Water SO - Soil SL- Sludge 01-O il LIQ - Other Liquid LAB USE ONLY zzM - ( ..........lumaround Time /4>td. 10 Business Days 7Day RUSH Business days) Approved By: Date/Rush Code; 5 Day RU SH 3 Day EM ER G EN CY 2Day E M E R G E N C Y 1 Day EM ER G EN CY Q Data Deliverable Information COMMERCIAL "A " (RESULTS ONLY) C O M M E R C IA L " B " (RESULTS PLUS QC) REDT1 (EPA LEVEL 3) FULLT1 (EPA LEVEL 4) ^ E D D 'S r "" / j ICo mme nts Rem.arks Hard Copy of results Other j -j- /7 :Emerqency o r Rush T/A Data Available VIA Email or Lablink --- -- ------------ -- -- ~ __ _____ -Sample Custody m u st be documented below each tim e sam ples chanqe possession. In c lin in g courier dellverv. Relinquished by/AffiU Date Time: 2 A e o e a L o g to & p Received By/Affillatlon 6 O F P ic e Relinquished By/Affillatlon 7 ' Ltdtc Imie. r Hh/rr^t 4 Date Time: ) (Nation Lab Use O n ly : Custody Seal in Place: Y N Temp Blank Provided: Y N Preserved Where Applicable: Y N Total # of Coolers: Cooler Temperature (s) Celsius: - US00008258 US00008259  0 o o G Q ATTACHMENT 3 O o o ] D O G ] ] ] ] O US00008260 RESOLUTION CONSULTANTS Resolution Consultants 250 Apollo Drive Chelmsford, MA 01824 978.905.2100 978.905.2101 tel fax Data Validation Report Project: NAWC Warminster, PA Laboratory: Accutest Laboratories , Job Numbers: FA23101 Analyses/Method: PFCs by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)/ EPA Method 537 modified Validation Level: Limited Resolution Consultants 60276503.SI.MS Project Number:___________________ Prepared by: Paula DiMattei/Resolution Consultants Completed on :4/27/2015 Reviewed by: Lori Herberich /Resolution Consultants File Name: Warminster FA23101 PFCs SUMMARY The samples listed below were collected by Resolution Consultants from the NAWC Warminster, PA site on March 23-24, 2015. SDG Sam ple ID* M atrlx/Sam ple Type S1-0.8 03232015 Soil S2-0,8_03232015 Soil S3-1.5_03232015 Soil S4-8.5_03232015 Soil S5-1.0J33232015 Soil FA23101 S6-7_03242015 S7-0.5_03242015 Soil Soil S8-3_03242015 Soil S-DUP_03242015 Field duplicate of S7-0.5_03242015 EB-032315 Equipment blank FB-032315 Field blank FB-032415 Field blank *The date of sample collection was appended to the sample ID in the project database inorder to maintain unique sample IDs. Data validation activities were conducted with reference to: Accutest Laboratories SOP: Analysis of Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids by LC/MS/MS; MS 014.1, Rev. Date: 05/14 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Chlorinated Dioxin/Furan Data review (USEPA, September 2011); US00008261 Resolution Consultants 2 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review (June 2008); Quality Systems Manual (QSM) for Environmental Laboratories, Version 4.2 (DoD, October 2010); and the project-specific Sampling and Analysis Plan. In the absence of method-specific information, laboratory quality control (QC) limits, project-specific requirements and/or professional judgment were used as appropriate. REVIEW ELEMENTS The data were evaluated based on the following review elements (where applicable to the method): / Data completeness (chain-of-custody (COC)/sample integrity / Holding times/sample preservation / Initial calibration/initial and continuing calibration verification / Laboratory method blanks/equipment blanks Surrogate recoveries / Matrix spike (MS) and/or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) results / Laboratory control sample (LCS) results / Field duplicate results / Internal standard results . / Sample results/reporting issues The symbol ( / ) indicates that no validation qualifiers were applied based on this parameter. NA indicates that the parameter was not included as part of this data set or was not applicable to this validation and therefore not reviewed. The symbol ( X ) indicates that a QC nonconformance resulted in the qualification of data. Any QC nonconformance that resulted in the qualification of data is discussed below. In addition, nonconformances or other issues that were noted during validation, but did not result in qualification of data, may be discussed for informational purposes only. The data appear valid as reported and may be used for decision making purposes. Qualification of the data was not required. RESULTS Data Completeness/Sample Integrity The data package was reviewed and found to meet acceptance criteria for completeness: The COCs were reviewed for completeness of information relevant to the samples and requested analyses, and for signatures indicating transfer of sample custody. The laboratory sample login sheet(s) were reviewed for issues potentially affecting sample integrity, including the condition of sample containers upon receipt at the laboratory. Completeness of analyses was verified by comparing the reported results to the COC requests. US00008262 Resolution Consultants 3 Holding Times/Sample Preservation Sample preservation and preparation/analysis holding times were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met. Initial Calibration/initial and Continuing Calibration Verification Calibration data were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria to ensure that: the initial calibration (ICAL) percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) or correlation coefficient (r)/coefficient of determination (r2) method acceptance criteria were met; the initial calibration verification standard (ICV) percent recovery acceptance criteria were met; and the continuing calibration verification standard (CCV) frequency and method percent recovery criteria were met. The QC acceptance criteria were met. Laboratory Method Blanks/Eguipment Blanks Laboratory method blanks, field blanks and equipment rinsate blanks were evaluated as to whether there are contaminants detected above the detection limit (DL). Target compounds were not detected in the laboratory method blank, field blanks or equipment blanks associated with the samples in this data set. Surrogate Recoveries The surrogate recoveries (%Rs) were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met or qualification of the data was not required. MS/MSD Results The MS/MSD %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs) were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met. LCS Results The LCS %Rs were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met. Field Duplicate Results Field duplicate RPDs were reviewed for conformance with the Resolution Consultants QC criteria of <50% for solid matrices. These criteria apply if both results were greater than five times the limit of quantitation (LOQ), All field duplicate precision criteria were met. Internal Standard Results The internal standard (IS) results were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met. US00008263 Resolution Consultants 4 Sample Results/Reportina Issues If applicable, compounds detected at concentrations less than the limit of quantitation (LOQ) but greater than the detection limit (DL) were qualified by the laboratory as estimated (J). This "J" qualifier was retained during data validation. QUALIFICATION ACTIONS Qualification of the sample data was not required. US00008264 RESOLUTION CONSULTANTS Resolution Consultants 250 Apollo Drive Chelmsford, MA 01824 978.905.2100 978.905.2101 tel fax Data Validation Report Project: NAWC Warminster, PA Laboratory: . Accutest Laboratories Job Numbers: FA23700 Analyses/Method: PFCs by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)/ EPA Method 537 modified Validation Level: Limited Resolution Consultants 60276503.SI.MS Project Number: Prepared by: Paula DiMattei/Resolution Consultants Completed on:5/8/2015 Reviewed by: Lori Herberich /Resolution Consultants File Name: Warminster FA23700 PFCs SUMMARY The samples listed below were collected by Resolution Consultants from the NAWC Warminster, PA site on April 16-17, 2015. SDG Sample ID* Matrix/Sample Type DUP-041615 Field duplicate of HN-109S_04162015 FB-041615 Field blank FB-041715 Field blank HN-107I_04162015 Groundwater FA23700 HN-107SJ34162015 Groundwater HN-108l_04172015 Groundwater HN-108S_04t 72015 Groundwater HN-1Q9I_04162015 Groundwater HN-109SJ34162015 Groundwater 'The date of sample collection was appended to the sample ID inthe project database inorder to maintain unique sample IDs. Data validation activities were conducted with reference to: Accutest Laboratories SOP: Analysis of Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids by LC/MS/MS; MS 014.1, Rev. Date: 05/14 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Chlorinated Dioxin/Furan Data review (USEPA, September 2011); USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review (June 2008); and Quality Systems Manual (QSM) for Environmental Laboratories, Version 4.2 (DoD, October 2010); and US00008265 Resolution Consultants 2 In the absence of method-specific information, laboratory quality control (QC) limits, project-specific requirements and/or professional judgment were used as appropriate. REVIEW ELEMENTS The data were evaluated based on the following review elements (where applicable to the method): Data completeness (chain-of-custody (COC)/sample integrity / .Holding times/sample preservation Initial calibration/initial and continuing calibration verification / Laboratory method blanks/equipment blanks / Surrogate recoveries / Matrix spike (MS) and/or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) results / Laboratory control sample (LCS) results / Field duplicate results / Internal standard results / Sample results/reportingissues The symbol ( / ) indicates that no validation qualifiers were applied based on this parameter. NA indicates that the parameter was not included as part of this data set or was not applicable to this validation and therefore not reviewed. The symbol (X ) indicates that a QC nonconformance resulted in the qualification of data. Any QC nonconformance that resulted in the qualification of data is discussed below. In addition, nonconformances or other issues that were noted during validation, but did not result in qualification of data, may be discussed for informational purposes only. The data appear valid as reported and may be used for decision making purposes. Qualification of the data was not required. RESULTS Data Completeness/Sample Integrity The data package was reviewed and found to meet acceptance criteria for completeness: The COCs were reviewed for completeness of information relevant to the samples and requested analyses, and for signatures indicating transfer of sample custody. The laboratory sample login sheet(s) were reviewed for issues potentially affecting sample integrity, including the condition of sample containers upon receipt at the laboratory. Completeness of analyses was verified by comparing the reported results to the COC requests. US00008266 Resolution Consultants 3 Holding Times/Samole Preservation Sample preservation and preparation/analysis holding times were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met or qualification of the data was not required. Initial Calibration/lnitial and Continuing Calibration Verification Calibration data were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria to ensure that: the initial calibration (ICAL) percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) or correlation coefficient (r)/coefficient of determination (r2) method acceptance criteria were met; the initial calibration verification standard (ICV) percent recovery acceptance criteria were met; and the continuing calibration verification standard (CCV) frequency and method percent recovery criteria were met. The QC acceptance criteria were met. Laboratory Method Blanks/Eguipment Blanks Laboratory method blanks and field blanks are evaluated as to whether there are contaminants detected above the detection limit (DL). Target compounds were not detected in the field blanks associated with the samples in this data set. The method blank associated with samples HN-107S, HN-1071, HN-109S, HN-1091, DUP-041615 and FB-041615 contained Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid (PFHxS) [0.00863 J pg/L] and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) [0.102 pg/L]. Since the PFOS amount in the method blank exceeded the reporting limit (RL), re-extraction of all associated samples was performed with two exceptions: 1) Sample HN-107S was not re-extracted because there was insufficient sample volume available for re-extraction and 2) The field blank FB-041615 was not re-extracted since no target compounds were detected in this blank. However, it should be noted that the re-extraction was performed outside of the 14-day extraction holding time criterion. Although the method blank associated with the re-extraction batch was free from contamination, professional judgement was used to report the original analyses which were performed within holding time and without qualification since the method blank contamination in the original batch appears to be an anomaly. The sample results in the re-extraction/reanalysis were similar to the original analyses of these samples and the field blank (FB-041615) prepared in the original batch was free from contamination. Surrogate Recoveries The surrogate recoveries (%Rs) were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met or qualification of the data was not required. MS/MSD Results The MS/MSD %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs) were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met. US00008267 Resolution Consultants 4 LCS Results . The LCS %Rs were reviewed for conformance. All QC acceptance criteria were met. Field Duplicate Results Field duplicate RPDs were reviewed for conformance with the Resolution Consultants QC criterion of <30% for aqueous matrices. This criterion applies if both results were greater than five times the limit of quantitation (LOQ). All field duplicate precision criteria were met. Internal Standard Results The internal standard (IS) results were reviewed for conformance with the QC acceptance criteria. All QC acceptance criteria were met. Sample Results/Reportina Issues If applicable, compounds detected at concentrations less than the limit of quantitation (LOQ) but greater than the detection limit (DL) were qualified by the laboratory as estimated (J). This "J" qualifier was retained during data validation. QUALIFICATION ACTIONS Qualification of the sample data was not required. US00008268