Document mqyQbx8Lp3LqNR512xwkqBLoQ

Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1986 / Rules and Regulations 22497 rational statements, if deemed members representing lumber producers This amendment is not considered to necessary, under 10.3(a), and would and lumber .specifiers. be a "major rule" under Executive Order have eliminated a mechanism of The National Bureau of Standards has 12291 because it will not (1) have an validating consensus through a concept adopted a suggestion of the GPI with annual effect of $100 million or more on . of "acceptance by volume of regard to the submission of rationale the economy, (2) provide a major production" and "acceptance by volume statements. The GPI suggested that such increase in costs or prices for of distribution." Finally, the proposal statements, if deemed necessary, should consumers, individual industries, would have allowed representatives of be Included in the written report of the Federal, State or local government Federal agencies to vote on committees. Chairman of the Standard Review agencies, or geographic regions, or (3) Several other minor changes to the Committee, in 10.5(d). The final have significant adverse economic procedures were proposed of an amendment, however, also includes a effects on competition, employment, editorial nature, as well as some provision for the submission of a investments, productivity, innovation, or additions and deletions. rationale statement by the proponent on the ability of United Statcs-bascd The October 28,. 1985 Federal Register Notice provided a 45 day period for the submission of comments. The. American Lumber Standards Committee, the Standing Committee for PS 28-70, "American Softwood Lumber Standard," requested a 90 day extension of the comment period to allow sufficient time to develop a committee response to the proposal. This request was granted in a Federal Register Notice published on December 9.1985. (50 FR 50177), extending the comment period to March 12,1988. Comments on the proposed amendment were received from the American Lumber Standards Committee ("ALSC") and the Glass Packaging institute ("GP1"). the proponent for Voluntary Product Standard PS 73-77, "Carbonated Soft Drink Bottles." The GPI basically disagreed with the entire proposal to amend the procedures stating that the existing procedures had worked-well and there was no reason to change them.' - The ALSC suggested certa(n changes to the proposed amendment to avoid what the Committee believed were potential problems. After carefully reviewing the proposed amendment and considering the comments received, the National Bureau of Standards has under 10.3(a) as well as a provision for the submission of a rationale statement by the Chairman of the Standard Review Committee under 10.5(d). In both cases, the submission of such rationale statements is otily required if such are "deemed necessary by the Department." The proposed deletion of the mechanism for validating consensus through a concept of "acceptance by volume of production" and "acceptance by volume of distribution" was based on the preception that this complicated mechanism was no longer necessary since it has been used only once during the last 20 years. Both the ALSC and the GPI urged the retention of this mechanism. Therefore, the Department has decided to retain this mechanism in 10.6(0 of the procedures. The proposed new 10.14 on "appeals" has been modified to reflect the changes suggested by. the ALSC. The most significant change pertains to the filing of an appeal of a procedural action with the body taking that action (i.e.. the Standard Review Committee, the Standing Committee, or the NBS). NBS agrees that the appeal should properly be heard by the body taking the action, and should be limited to procedural actions. The proposed new 10.15 on the enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic or export matters. The General Counsel of the Department of Commerce has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy.of the Small Business Administration that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it does not affect small companies and only affects trade associations that desire to develop voluntary standards through these procedures. This rule does not have a collection of information for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. Preparation of a Regulatory Impact Analysis is not required and no preliminary or final Regulatory Impact Analysis has been or will be prepared, List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 10 Administrative practice and procedure; Voluntary standards. Dated: June 16,1986. Ernest Ambler, Director, National Bureau ofStandards. Part 10 of Title IS CFR is revised as set forth below: PART 10--PROCEDURES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VOLUNTARY PRODUCT STANDARDS decided to accept the changes suggested issuance of interpretations was opposed Sec. by the ALSC. with some modifications. These recommendations pertain to $ $ 10.4,10.8.10.14, and 10.15. In considering the ALSC position regarding 10.8. NBS has provided for the appointment by the Department of Commerce of'two Federal representatives as voting members on by both the ALSC and GPI. The ALSC pointed out that there was a mechanism established within PS 20-70 for . providing Interpretations of the American Softwood Lumber Standard. The ALSC suggested that it develop formal procedures for issuing interpretations and submit the proposed 10.0 General. 10.1 Initiating development of a new standard. 10.2 Funding. 10.3 Development of a.proposed standard. 10.4 Establishment of the Standard Review Committee. 10.5 Development of a recommended standard. the Standing Committee for PS 20-70, if procedures to NBS for approval and that 10.6 Procedures for acceptance of a requested to do so by that committee. other Standing Committees do likewise, recommended standard. Similarly, NBS has provided for the appointment of one Federal agency representative as a voting member of the other Standing Committees and of Standard Review Committees, if requested to do so by those committees. The appointment of two Federal voting members on the ALSC is justified on the if they have a need for issuing interpretations. NBS has accepted the ALSC suggestions. As there were no comments submitted regarding the proposed editorial or other changes in the following sections, the changes have been included in the final rule: 10.0(b)(3), 10.0(c)(9), 10.1(b). 10.7 Procedure when a recommended standard is not supported by a consensus.. 10.8 Standing Committee. 10.9 Publication of a standard. 10.10 Review of published standards. 10.11 Revision or amendment of a standard. 10.12 Editorial changes. 10.13 Withdrawal of a published standard. basis of the large size of the Committee 10.3(a)(4), 10.3(a)(5), 10.3(a)(0), 10.9(a). 10.14 Appeals. (presently 22 voting members) and the 6 10.9(b). 10.13(a), 10.13(b), 10.13(c) and 10.15 Interpretations. advisory (non-voting) Federal agency 10.13(d). 10.16 Effect of procedures. GLEASON-000762