Document mp7JBOq68dOBqY5LJvXKvKQyd
ANSWER: Applicable.
See Response to Interrogatory No. 102. Not
112.
If any medical examination of any mine employ
ees of defendant were made, did any such medical test reveal
that mine employees of defendant were developing asbestosis even
though their job was an ''outside type job" as contrasted with a
job wherein they worked in a confined or limited area?
ANSWER: Applicable.
See Response to Interrogatory No. 102. Not
113.
State whether defendant belonged to, or was an
associate or correspondent of, the Asbestos Research Council of
England.
ANSWER: Council.
Abex Corporation was never a member of said
114.
State whether defendant belonged to, or was an
associate or correspondent of, the Asbestos Research Council of
England.
ANSWER: Council.
Abex Corporation was never a member of said
115.
State whether defendant sold or distributed any
asbestos products to English firms or corporations for any year
from 1948 to 1963.
ANSWER:
Abex objects to this Interrogatory on the
following grounds:
1. Burden
2. Overly Broad
-56-