Document mbkxRn4eBey49KBKrVa8LYKz0
/ March 12, 194?
Dr. Roy C * A. Boclc, Remington Arms Company, Inc*, Kings Mills, Ohio.
Dear Dr. Bock:
I am sending you herewith a report giving the results ob tained on the eight additional men*
A few comments on these results seem to he amply justified.
I have gone over the information contained In your letter
and recorded on the examinet iq il j i&c ords . Let me remind you
first that X have no data
B^^Bl
will he useful to have the additionaJ^nrorma11o!W^^our
convenience. It is quite apparent that there are certain
spots of significant exposure in your Shot lover. I have a
limited familiarity with the operations in such a plant and
I recognize that the opportunities for lead exposure may
vary considerably with the different occupations^^n^s
armarent that the character of the work done byfH^|B and
is of a hazardous type. The fact that ths~ results
`entire same for all practical purposes on these two men
is sufficient evidence on this score. The results on Morris
are also quite high and they indicate the advisability of
looking Into the exposure in connection with his work. If
we assume that he has had no prior exposure to lead, he
must have had a rather heavy exposure since entering upon
his present work. The same comment^arf^^^t^ied to a some
what lesser degree in the case of^^^^^^^^BB The re
sults on the blood of
BBB^uidB^^BK are essen
tially the same, but tnere I^conStderabi^vSrWtlon in the
urinary values on these men, a circumstance which may
have resulted from considerable variation in their intake
short^^J^^m^Jjhe samples were taken. The urine sample
fron^B^B|^^^B must certainly have been quite dilute.
MB|Ban<^^^^B have apparentljMiad very little exposure.
^n^rEidlng^H^he blood of ^BBftare somewhat above normal
levels and are indicative of IHSWRight exposure. On point
In the interpretation of these results Is the actual length
of time they have been on the job. Your comments Indicate
that several of the men are new employees, but it is Important
to-'know what you mean by that statement. That is to say, I
should know whether they have been exposed a few days, a few
weeks, or a few months. Any change which might take place
In the blood levels within a few days would be very signifi
cant , but if it developed only over a period of months, It
Dr. Roy C. A. Bock - (2) - March 12, 194?
would he much less important. This further information, there fore, would he quite useful in connection with the new men. Also, the exact date on which anyone of the men moved from one joh to another would also he significant.
After examining these data yourself, you may have some question in your mind concerning their significance in relation to other facts which you may have concerning the work of these men and the care they take in protecting themselves against exposure. I should he glad to give you any help X can in the further in terpretation of the results to your practical advantage.
Just for the sake of the greater convenience to ourselves, I am enclosing herewith an additional invoice to cover the cost of these sixteen additional analyses.
Cordially yours.
RAK ef Enc.
Robert A. &ehoe, M D.
KF 0018501
Robert A. Kehoe, M. D* University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
Eden Avenue, Cincinnati
March 12, 19^3
Remington Arms Company, Inc*, Kings Mills, Ohio*
Attention: Dr. Roy C . A. Bock 16 Blood and Urine Analyses on the
following men:
$80,00
KE 0018502
N19679.01
Samples of urine and blood from several employees of the Remington Arms Company*
URINE
Analysis Volume Mg. Pb/
Number
Ml.
Liter
toA-731k3*rl51 k3A-231
kMzlki kiA-m k3A-729
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0*05 0*15 Jitii 0.06 0.11 0.5k 0.01 0.06
BLOOD
Analysis Number
k5A-752
Spectrographic
Ditbizone
Grams
Mg. Pb/ 100 S-
Grams
Mg. Pb/ 100 g*
0.06
18*9
0.06
iA=Z5k 20.0
0.014.5 22.7
0.05
to.A-73.8_ 18.20 0.15
18.53 0.17
to.A-73k 15.6
Q.Ok
19.X
0.05
k5A-7?6 18.k
0.06
18.6
0.075
k?A-7k2 k3A-7k0
1is* lit.8
Qj222. Q--Q33.
iZii 18.8
0.15
o.o6
jjjA-JjO, 17.2
0.0k
ilii
0.0k
HE 0018503
Samples Received; $~k~k3 Samples Reported; 3-IO-I4.5
N19679.02