Document m32ZYDZBvjq7RKN15awJ4vB4

Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 1 of 326 PAGEID #: 40163 EXHIBIT J Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 2 of 326 PAGEID #: 40164 [REDACTED - NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION] EXPERT REPORT FOR Carla Marie Bartlett v. E. /. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-170 (S.D. Ohio) AND John M. Wolf v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Civil Action No. 2:14-0545 (S.D.W.Va.) Prepared For: Plaintiffs Steering Committee in E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Liability Litigation Case No. 2:13-MD-2433 (S.D. Ohio) Prepared by: James S. Smith, Ph.D., CPC Trillium, Inc. 28 Grace's Drive Coatesville, PA 19320 (610) 383-7233 November 20, 2014 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 3 of 326 PAGEID #: 40165 I. AREA OF TESTIMONY ' T ,t r il l iu mI INC. I expect to testify at trial for the Plaintiffs in the referenced cases above on the subjects of: 1) the precision, accuracy, representativeness, completion, and comparability (PARCC) of the methods used by DuPont to measure the concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in drinking water; 2) the extent of DuPont's knowledge of the PARCC of the reported PFOA concentrations in drinking water over time; 3) the actual error of the PFOA concentrations in drinking water over time; and 4) the accuracy of DuPont's representations to the public and others concerning the levels of PFOA concentrations in drinking water. My opinions in these areas are set forth in the following sections of this report. II. SCOPE OF DUTIES I was retained by Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP of Cincinnati, Ohio on behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee in this MDL to provide expert services including the review of reports, data, depositions, and pertinent documents. The work involves the preparation of an expert report and may involve deposition and trial testimony and the related preparation. III. INFORMATION CONSIDERED, REVIEWED, AND/OR RELIED UPON See Appendix A IV. PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID CHEMISTRY A. Nomenclature Ammonium perfluorooctanoate, also known as ammonium pentadecafluorooctanoate, APFO, C-8, or FC-143 is the ammonium salt of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). APFO and PFOA belong to a class of compounds known as perfluorocarboxylic acids which are completely fluorinated carboxylic acids. One end of the molecule, known as the head, contains a carboxyl group (COOH or COO') and the other end, known as the tail, contains the fluorocarbon. The molecular structure of the straight-chain (normal or linear) -APFO and -PFOA are shown in Table 1. There can be structural isomers of APFO and PFOA in which the fluorocarbon is branched both terminally, such as perfluoro-6-methylheptanoic acid (Ao-PFOA), and internally, such as perfluoro-5-methylheptanoic acid (5?-PFOA) and perfluoro-4-methylheptanoic acid (4mPFOA). 1 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 4 of 326 PAGEID #: 40166 ^ Tt RILLIUIVLc Table 1. Nomenclature Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate CAS No. 3825-26-1 Molecular Formula c 8h 4f 15n o 2 Condensed Structural Formula CF3(CF2)6C 02NH4 of Linear Molecule Structure of Linear O Molecule CF/, ' \ cf2/ " \ cf2/ \ c,f2A o-nh/ Molecular Weight 431.10 Other Names ammonium pentadecafluorooctanoate APFO C-8 FC-143 3M Trade Names FluoradTM FC-143 and FC-118 Perfluorooctanoic Acid 335-67-1 c 8h 1f 15o 2 CF3(CF2)6C 02H 0 CF/, N CF2/ "' \ / CFj c,\ CF,A OH 414.07 pentadecafluorooctanoic acid PFOA FluoradTM Acid FC-26 B. Physical and Chemical Properties APFO and PFOA are known as anionic surfactants. Surfactants lower the surface tension of water and contain both a water soluble (hydrophilic) group and a water insoluble or oil soluble (hydrophobic) group. The head of the APFO and PFOA molecules contain the carboxyl group while the tail of the molecule contains the fluorocarbon. The physical properties of APFO and PFOA are influenced by both the head and the tail of the molecule. The carboxyl group at the head of the PFOA molecule is known as a "weak" acid because it is only partially ionized in water depending on the pFI forming the perfluorooctanoate anion and the hydrogen cation. CF3(CF2)6C(0)0H ^ CF3(CF2)6C(0)0- + H+ (Equation 1) The double arrows indicate that the above process can go in both the forward and in the backward direction. At equilibrium, the forward and backward rates are the same. This process for PFOA can be expressed in an equation defined as Ka = [H+][CF3(CF2)6C(0)0-] - [CF3(CF2)6C(0)0H] (Equation 2) where Ka is known as the equilibrium constant (acid dissociation or ionization constant) and the brackets designate the molar concentration of each substance enclosed within the bracket. The pKa (pKA= - LogioKA) for PFOA, which ranges between <1.0 and 1.3 in the literature, Table 2, has been challenging because of the surfactant properties of PFOA.1 The [FI+] in the above equation is the concentration of the hydrogen ion and is linked to the pFI of the solution by 1 Lena Vierke, Urs Berger, and Ian T. Cousins, Estimation of the Acid Dissociation Constant of Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids through an Experimental Investigation of their Water-to-Air Transport, Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47, pp. 11032-11039. 2 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 5 of 326 PAGEID #: 40167 pH = -Logio[H+] * Ttrilliuminc (Equation 3) By decreasing the pH (i.e., increasing the H+concentration) the equilibrium shifts toward the left, and by increasing the pH (i.e., decreasing the H+ concentration) the equilibrium shifts to the right. Thus pH will determine through the equilibrium equation which forms of PFOA will be present in water, the un-dissociated acid CF3(CF2)(jC(0)0H or the anion CF3(CF2)(5C(0)0~. The anion is more soluble in water. The un-dissociated acid is more soluble in organic solvents. APFO is the ammonium salt of PFOA. APFO dissociates in water to form the perfluorooctanoate anion and the ammonium cation. The ammonium cation is a weak acid and has its own equilibrium. CF3(CF2)6C(0)0NH4 ^ C F 3(CF2)6C (0)0' + NH4+ and (Equation 4) NH4+^ H++ NH3 (Equation 5) The dissociation constant for APFO K is 4570, Table 2 and can be expressed as K = [NH4+][CF3(CF2)6C(0)0-] - [CF3(CF2)6C(0)0NH4] (Equation 6) Ka = [H+][NH3] - [NH4+] = 5.75 x 1(F10 @ 25C (Equation 7) With a dissociation constant K = 4570, Table 2, when APFO is added to water (at a pH = 7) only a small fraction of APFO will be un-dissociated. However, Equation 1 will also be involved when the pH is lowered to < 2 (increasing [H+]) forming the un-dissociated acid CF3(CF2)6C(0)0H. Thus, pH plays an important role in whether un-dissociated acid CF3(CF2)6C(0)0H or the perfluorooctanoate anion CF3(CF2)6C(0)0` predominate in aqueous solutions. Thus, pH will also effect the solubility in water, volatility of APFO and PFOA in aqueous solutions (Henry's Law Constant), and the adsorption on soil. A University of Delaware REDACTED REDACTED 3 REDACTED 234 APFO and PFOA will form micelles in aqueous solutions when the concentration of APFO or PFOA reaches a certain concentration known as the critical micelle concentration (CMC), Table 2. The Krafft temperature, Table 2 is the minimum temperature at which the surfactant forms micelles. Micelles are an aggregate of APFO or PFOA molecules dispersed in the aqueous phase that form a stable complex with each other with the hydrophilic head of the molecules in contact with the water phase and the hydrophobic tail of the molecules in the center of the micelle. Micelle's are similar to a second phase within the aqueous phase which allow the concentration of APFO and PFOA to increase above their solubilities. It is also reported that these 2University of Delaware C8 Study (Bates No. EID212859-EID212872). 3 http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/190acidrain.html. 4 The weighted annual mean pH of the precipitation at Caldwell, Ohio, about 36 miles from Washington Works plant site was approximately 4.1 to 4.2 in the 1980s and 4.2 to 4.3 in the 1990. http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/sites/ntn/ntntrends.html?siteID=OH49. 3 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 6 of 326 PAGEID #: 40168 " ( t RILLIUK/L, compounds form pre-micelles at concentrations below the CMC and stable dimeric clusters (CFs/CF2)6C(0)0)2H` form at concentrations of 1 mg/L PFOA.'''56 5 Lena Vierke, Urs Berger, and Ian T. Cousins, Estimation of the Acid Dissociation Constant of Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids through an Experimental Investigation of their Water-to-Air Transport, Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47, pp. 11032-11039. Jie Cheng, Elefteria Psillakis, M. R. Hoffmann, and A. J. Colussi, Acid Dissociation versus Molecular Association of Perfluoroalkyl Oxoacids: Environmental Implications, J. Phys Chem A, 2009, 113, pp. 8152-8156. 4 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 7 of 326 PAGEID #: 40169 ^ Tt RILLIUIVLc Table 2 Physical Properties of APFO and PFOA Property APFO PFOA Reference Melting Point (C) 130 55 1 REDACTED REDACTED 2,3 45-50 7 Boiling Point (C) Sublimes 189 1 REDACTED 2 189-192 7 Vapor Pressure mm Hg 1 x 10-'@25C 10 @ 25C 1 REDACTED - 0.04 @ 25C 2 oz 7 6.1 x 10"5(2>20C 0.0169 @20C 9 Solubility in Water 20 g/L gels 3.4 g/L 1,7 5.1 g/L @ 30C REDACTED REDACTED 2,3 2,3 >500 g/L @ 25 C 4.4 g/L @ 25 C 9 Octanol Water Distribution 1.92 7 LogioD (experimental) Acid Dissociation Constant <1.0- 1.3 5 pKA 0.5 5 2.5 8 Dissociation Constant pK -3.66 4 Krafft Point C 2.5 20 3 Critical Micelle Concentration 14.2 g/L @ 2.5 C 3.7 g/L @ 20C 3 Decomposition Temperature 150-165 C 4 Henry's Law Constant (atm- 1.2 x 10`1U@ 25C 4 (calculated) m3/gmole) Table References: 1. 2/20/02, USEPA Draft Hazard Assessment of Perfluorooctanoic Acid and its Salts, corrected 4/15/02. 2. 10/17/95, Interoffice Memo from Martin Schiller to Rick Brandenburg re: C-8 Properties. (Bates No. EID178612-EID178618). 3. K. Shinoda et al., Physicochemical Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Fluorinated Surfactants, J Phys Chem 1972, 76(6), pp 909-914. " 4. 12/17/01, DuPont, Emission Modeling Data Required in Consent Order GWR-2001-019 Section VII.D. (Bates No. DJM000147-DJM000155). 5. Lena Vierke, Urs Berger, and Ian T. Cousins, Estimation of the Acid Dissociation Constant of Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids through an Experimental Investigation of their Water-to-Air Transport, Environmental Science and Technology, 47, pp. 11032-11039. 6. Jie Cheng, Elefteria Psillakis,f M. R. Hoffmann, and A. J. Colussi, Acid Dissociation versus Molecular Association of Perfluoroalkyl Oxoacids: Environmental Implications, J. Phys Chem A, 2009, 113, pp. 8152 8156. 7. Sierra Rayne and Kaya Forest, Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonic and Carboxylic Acids: A Critical Review of Physicochemical Properties, Levels and Patterns in Waters and Wastewaters, and Treatment Methods, J. Environ Sci & Health A, 2009, 44, pp. 1145-1199. 8. USEPA AR-226 473. 9. Paustenbach, Dennis J., et. al., A Methodology for Estimating Human Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA): A Retrospective Exposure Assessment of a Community (1951-2003), Journal o f Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2007, 70, pp. 28-57. 5 J l kCase: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 8 of 326 PAGEID #: 40170 ' \TRILLIUM ,,c According to the USEPA, "PFOA is very persistent in the environment."78PFOA is stable under normal environmental conditions in water, soil, sediment, and sludge. PFOA and APFO are chemically and thermally stable because of the strong fluorine carbon bond.9 APFO when heated to 350F in a "sintering" step looses carbon dioxide and ammonia.101 This procedure is used at DuPont's Spurance Plant to destroy APFO by the following reaction: CF3(CF2)6C02'NH4+ -> CF3(CF2)fCF2H + C 02+ NH3 u-PFOA undergoes a similar decomposition at temperatures between 355 and 385 C to yield 1-H-perfluoroheptane and minor amounts of perfluoro-l-heptene from the loss of CO2 and HF.n n-PFOA will also decompose by direct photolysis at certain ultraviolet wavelengths. PFOA was also reported to degrade by catalyzed H2O2 propagations modified Fenton's reagent.12134 C. Synthesis of PFOA and Production of Isomers (3M v. DuPont) There are two major synthesis paths for the production of PFOA. 3M used electrochemical fluorination (ECF) and DuPont used telomerization. In the ECF process, octanoyl chloride (H(CH2)7C0C1) reacts with anhydrous hydrofluoric acid (HF) to produce octanoyl fluoride (H(CH2)7COF) which undergoes electrolysis to produce perfluorooctanoyl fluoride (F(CF2)7COF).13,14 Perfluorooctanoyl fluoride undergoes hydrolysis to produce the acid PFOA. PFOA can then be converted into salts such as the ammonium salt (APFO) or the sodium salt (sodium perfluorooctanoate) by neutralization. CH3(CH2)6C0C1 ^ > CF3(CF2)6COF + HC1 + H2 CF3(CF2)6COF + H20 -->HF + CF3(CF2)6C02H (PFOA) CF3(CF2)6C 02H + NH3(aq) -> CF3(CF2)6C 02NH4 (APFO) 7Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Fluorinated Telomers, http://www.epa.gov/oppt/pfoa/. 8 Mark FI. Russell, DuPont ttaskell Laboratory for Health and Environmental Sciences, PFOA and PFOS Physical-Chemical Properties, Environmental Fate, Monitoring and Modeling, October 16, 2009, http://www.epa.gov/oppt/pfoa/pubs/Properties%20and%20fate-%. 9 Robert C. Buck, et al., Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2011, 7(4), pp. 513-541. 10 Letter from Gerald L. Kennedy (DuPont) to Dr. Charles M. Auer (US EPA) re: DuPont's uses of APFO, June 23, 2000 (Bates No. EID070482-ETD070492). 11 Sierra Rayne and Kaya Forest, Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonic and Carboxylic Acids: A Critical Review of Physicochemical Properties, Levels and Patterns in Waters and Wastewaters, and Treatment Methods, JEnviron Sci. & Health A, 2009, 44, pp. 1145-1199. 12 Shannon M. Mitchell et al., Degradation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid by Reactive Species Generated through Catalyzed H202 Propagation Reactions, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2014, 1, pp. 117-121. 13Robert C. Buck, et al., Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2011, 7(4), pp. 513-541. 14Voluntary Use and Exposure Information Profile for Perfluorooctanoic Acid and Salts, 3M Company. 2000. USEPA Administrative Record AR226-0595. 6 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 9 of 326 PAGEID #: 40171 ^ TTRILLlUIVLc The conversion of octanoyl fluoride to perfluorooctanoyl fluoride is a free radical reaction which can lead to carbon chain breakage and rearrangement. The chain breakage and rearrangement produces a mixture of linear and branched perfluoroalkyl isomers and homologues.13*5 The amount of branched-chain isomers depends on the reaction conditions but can amount to 20 to 30% of the amount of rz-PFOA. DuPont used l9F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to determine the structure of several of the branched chain isomers in PFOA produced by the ECF procedure.16 The NMR mole percent for each of the isomers are shown in Table 3. DuPont also reported three types of the internally branched isomers representing the different internal carbons in which the branch occurred. Similar mole percentages were reported from 19F NMR analysis by 3M. The composition of 3M's PFOA was consistent year to year, one study of 18 lots over 20 years found an average composition was 78% linear and 22% branched isomers with standard deviations of 1.2%.17 3M's Product Information for FluoradTM Fluorochemical Acid FC-26 lists a composition of > 97% PFOA by gas chromatography of which 78% was the linear PFOA, 13% was isobranched, and 9% was internally branched.18 The product also contained perfluoroinated alkyl groups down to C5Fn. The chromatogram from 3M's method for determining the composition of PFOA and its salts show one large peak (representing 75 area %) for the linear PFOA along with nine smaller peaks 3M identifies as C-8 isomers.19 Of these nine isomer peaks, four peaks range between 3-9 area % and the rest are less than 0.5 area %. 3M also identified one peak as a C-6 acid and two peaks as C-7 acid. Benskin et al. reported finding ten isomers in a lot of 3M's PFOA utilizing liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS).20 Benskin et al. were able to identify and quantify the n-, iso-, 5m, Am, 3m isomers where 5, 4, and 3 are the carbon number where the branching occurs (e.g., 5m-PFOA is perfluoro-5-methylheptanoic acid). They found that the branched isomers accounted for 17.8 % of the PFOA. 13 Cyclic by-products are also formed. Lehmler H.J., Production of Fluorinated Surfactants by electrochemical Fluorination, In: Zoller U, Sosis P, editors. "Handbook of Detergents," Part F, 2009, CRC, p. 314-315. 16Memo from D. Dubois to M. Kaiser re: Analysis of Perfluoro-Octanoic Acid Samples (19F) NMR, November 15, 2000, (Bates No. EID152583-E1D152593) 17Jonathan P. Benskin, Perfluorinated Acid Isomer Profiling in Water and Quantitative Assessment of Manufacturing Source, Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44, pp. 9049-9054. 18Product Information, 3M FluoradTM Fluorochemical Acid FC-26, July 7, 2000, http://www.3m.fr/US/mfg_industrial/perfchem/prodinfo/fluoroch/FC26/FC26_l.html. 19 Quality Control Test Method, Perfluoroinated C8 Acid, its Salt or the Aqueous Salt, % Composition by GC, 3M, September 11, 1998, (Bates No. EID185895-EID185899). Note: This method GC/FID to analyze the acid derivatized to the methyl ester derivatized by BF3 in methanol. 20 Jonathan P. Benskin et al., Perfluoroinated Acid Isomer Profiling in Water and Quantitative Assessment of Manufacturing Source, Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44, pp. 9049-9054 and supporting information at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/! 0.1021 /es 1025 82x. 7 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 10 of 326 PAGEID #: 40172 JL \TRILLIUM mc Table 3. PFOA Isomers Structure NMR mole% ) Linear Chain xv,. / Cl3 . , Cl, / / \/ \/ er, <t2 cr, ci-. er 78.9 0 Ao-branched C.F,.^ XCF ciT / CP, a-2 er 8.6 Internally-branched t;h r,;- \ . ,! (Cl-;,),. o /X _ (''F-.y 12.0 te rtia ry -branched T 1' c% . / \ t2 ' Cl-, \ ' CI-, o~ 0.2 3M sold APFO under the trade name FluoradTM FC-143 and FC-118. According to 3M's material safety data sheet (MSDS) for FC-143, the active ingredients were 95.0-100.0% APFO, < 5.0% ammonium perfluoroheptanonate, <5.0% ammonium perfluorohexanoate, and <5.0% ammonium perfluoropentanoate (<5.0%).212There was no breakdown on the isomers of APFO. 3M's product information for FC-118 states the product is a 20% aqueous solution of APFO. The MSDS for FC-118 lists the ingredients as 80% water, 18-21% APFO, 0.1-1.0 ammonium perfluoroheptanonate, 0-0.1% ammonium perofluorohexanoate, and 0.1-1.0% ammonium perfluoropentanoate.23 3M produced PFOA and APFO by the ECF procedure from the 1950s to 2002 when production was stopped because of environmental concerns.24 DuPont developed the telomerization process in the 1970's.25 In this process iodine (T). 21 MSDS for FC-143 FLUORAD Brand Fluorochemical Sulfactant, 3M, December 18, 1990, (Bates No. EID024272EID024275). 22 Product Information sheets for FluoradTM Fluorochemical Emulsifiers FC-118 and FC-1090, 3M, September 98. 23 MSDS for FC-118 FluoradTM Brand Fluorochemical Sulfactant, 3M, February 19, 1997, (Bates No. EID008492EID008498). 24 Jonathan P. Benskin, et al., Perfluorinated Acid Isomer Profiling in Water and Quantitative Assessment of Manufacturing Source, Environmental Science & Technology>, 2010, 44, pp. 9049-9054. 25 Jonathan P. Benskin et al., Manufacturing Origin of Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in Atlantic and 8 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 11 of 326 PAGEID #: 40173 * \ TRILLIUM,,.c iodine pentafluoride (IF5) and tetrafluoroethylene (TFE - C2F4) are catalyzed by antimony pentafluoride to produce pentafluoroethyl iodide (C2F5I). Pentafluoroethyl iodide is telomerized with TFE to produce a mixture of perfluoroalkyl iodides (Telomer A, AL, and AN) which are linear with even number of carbons.26,27,28 REDACTED ,29 REDACTED REDACTED discussing the degradation product from the telomere materials, DuPont "knew that PFOA was a byproduct of their process for a long, long time."2678930 V. THE USES AND FATE OF AMMONIUM PERFLUOROOCTANOATE AT THE DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS PLANT IN WEST VIRGINIA DuPont began using APFO in 1951 at the Washington Works facility.31 Between 1951 and at least 200332 APFO was used as a surfactant in seven processes.33 These processes took place in REDACTED . ] .3435DuPont purchased APFO from 3M33,j6`37 as a dry Canadian Arctic Seawater, Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46, pp. 677-685. 26 Robert C. Buck, et al., Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2011, 7(4), pp. 513-541. 27Perfonnance Chemicals Process Technology, DuPont, (Bates No. EID138055-EID138063). The average chain length produced C2F5(C2F4)nI where n = 1, 2, 3, 4,5, and 6, depends on the degree of telomerization. Telomer A, AL, and AN typically contain 31, 33, and 54 % of the n=3 ^ F s ^ F W I ) telomer. 28 Konstantinos Prevedours, et al. Sources, Fate and Transport of Perfluorocarboxylates, Environmental Science & Technology, 2006 40(1) pp. 32-44. 29 Fluoroproducts Study Group, May 8, 2001,. (Bates No. EID169284-EID169288) 30 Deposition of Glenn R Evers, April 30, 2004, pp. 41, 63, and 64. 31 R. J. Zipfel et al., C-8 Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate Fluorosurfactant Strategies and Plans, September 15, 1994, (Bates No. EID099864-EID099878). 32 This report only refers to the information that was available as to C-8 processes and releases from DuPont's Washington Works plant through 2003. 33 Paustenbach, Dennis J., et al., A Methodology for Estimating Human Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA): A Retrospective Exposure Assessment of a Community (1951-2003), Journal o f Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2007, 70, pp. 28-57. j4 Email from Daniel Weber to John Migliore re: discussion of FC143, February 9, 1998, (Bates No. EID045015). 35 Letter from H.V. Bradley (DuPont) to Mr. William R. Packard (Lubeck) re: Appendix IX results from the analysis 9 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 12 of 326 PAGEID #: 40174 " \TRILLIUM lllc powder (FluoradTM FC-143) and later as a 20% aqueous solution (FluoradTMFC-l 18).38,39,40,41 The APFO passed through the manufacturing process unchanged. The polymers produced by these processes were either sold by DuPont as an aqueous dispersion containing APFO or as a dry product in which most of the APFO was removed during processing. The quantity of APFO used by DuPont between 1951 and 2003 at the Washington Works facility was reported by Dennis J. Paustenbach (a consultant working for and paid by DuPont) et al. in a 2007 publication in the Journal o f Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A.*3784012 Paustenbach et al. claims to have used purchasing records and other plant documents and graphed the annual amount of APFO used by the plant.43*45 The quantity of APFO used at the Washington Works facility started at 29 pounds in 1951 and increased steadily during the next five decades reaching approximately 174,000 pounds at its peak consumption in 2000. Prior to 1960 under 10,000 pounds of APFO were used per year and between 1960 and 1975 the consumption of APFO varied between 10,000 and 22,000 pounds per year. By 1980 the usage was over 40,000 pounds and by 1990 it was about 65,000 pounds. DuPont's records show that in 1991, 1992, REDACTED respectively.44,45 The following is a history of the APFO use at the Washington Works facility up through 2003 based on information obtained from Paustenbach et al., DuPont Process Descriptions and C8 Flow Sheets dated August 17, 2001 (Bates No. EID179289-EID179306), DuPont C-8 Flow Sheets for 1996 and 1999 (Bates No. EID185434-EID185438 and EID177167-EID177175), and Tables for 1999 and 2000 C-8 Usage and 2000 Disposal for Stacks and Surfactant Emissions (Bates No. EID180799-EID180801). A, History of APFO Use at DuPont's Washington Works Facility 1951-2003 1) 1951 - 2003 PTFE Fine Powder Process of well 27, June 13, 1989, (Bates No. EID022636-EID022646). 6 Other suppliers of APFO were Miteni and Hoecht. R. J. Zipfel et al., C-8 Ammonium Perfluorooctonate Fluorosurfactant Strategies and Plans, September 15, 1994, (Bates No.EID099864-EID099878). 37 Walter R Tong et al.,DFS-l (Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate) Basic Data, (Bates No. E1D177566-E1D177583). 38 Process Description Granular, DuPont (Bates No. ErD180743-EtDI80744). j9 Gregory A. Chaplan, C-8 Program Concept Evaluation Plan, January 17, 1997, (Bates No. EJD092770 EID09278 8--EID092092789). 40 R. J. Zipfel et al., C-8 Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate Fluorosurfactant Strategies and Plans, September 15, 1994 (Bates No. EID099864-EID099878). ' 41 FC-118 was a 20% solution used by DuPont. AIM, April 15, 1991, (Bates No. ErD080798-EID-080801). 2Paustenbach, Dennis J., et al., A Methodology for Estimating Human Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA): A Retrospective Exposure Assessment of a Community (1951 -2003), Journal o f Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2007, 70, pp. 28-57. ' 43 See Figure 6 in Paustenbach et al. showing the total amount of APFO consumed at the Washington works. R. J. Zipfel et al., C-8 Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate Fluorosurfactant Strategies and Plans, September 15 1994 (Bates No. EID099864-EID099878). 45 Washington Works C-8 Emissions, 1999 & 2000 C-8 Useageand Disposal, (Bates No. EID180800-EID180801) 10 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 13 of 326 PAGEID #: 40175 REDACTED REDACTED 46 ` ' Ttr il liu m , From 1951 through 1989 the hot exhaust air from the dryer was sent up stacks (48 and 78 feet high) into the atmosphere where the APFO vapors cooled and condensed into small particles which were distributed by the air currents tharooughout the area.47 In 1990 a C-8 scrubber was added to reduce APFO air emissions. The August 17. 2001 description of the fine powder process states that, REDACTED 49 Thus even with REDACTED Tables 4 and 5.50 The APFO that was recovered in the scrubber was purportedly processed for recycling. Additional treatment was added in 2002-2003, however, details on the efficiency of removing PFOA from the air was not reported.51 REDACTED According to DuPont's August 17, 2001 process description, REDACTED 52 Starting in 2001, the wastewater discharged into the C-8 sump was treated using an Oberlin filter to remove large solids and carbon beds to remove APFO. '3 The spent carbon beds were sent off-site where the carbon was regenerated and the APFO removed from the carbon was thermally destroyed. Prior to 2001, all of the wastewater was discarded directly into the Ohio River.54 2) 1951 - 2003 PTFE Dispersion Process REDACTED REDACTED 46 Process Description Fine Powder, DuPont (Bates No. EID 179291-EID 1179292). 47 Ibid. Paustenbach. 48 Ibid. Paustenbach. 49 August 17, 2001 Process Description Fine Powder, DuPont (Bates No. EID 179291-EID 179292). 50 The 1996 and 1999 Fine Powder C-8 Flow Sheets also show REDACTED 51 Ibid. Paustenbach. 52 Process Description Fine Powder, DuPont (Bates No. EID 179291-E1D179292). 53 Ibid. Paustenbach. 54 1996 Fine Powder - C-8 Flow Sheet (Bates No. EID185437) and 1999 Fine Powder - C-8 Flow Sheet with handwritten changes for 1999. (Bates No. EID177169). 11 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 14 of 326 PAGEID #: 40176 REDACTED ITRILLIUM ,,c 55,56 3) 1963 - 2003 FEP Process * 57 " REDACTED REDACTED however, between 1968 and 1997, the recovered APFO was released to the Ohio River.58 REDACTED However, Paustenbach et al. listed these vents/stacks as being used between 1963 to 2003 for the FEP wet finishing process.56789 REDACTED Beginning in 2001,60 these solutions were sent to the APFO Treatment System for APFO removal before discharge to the Ohio River. The treatment system consisted of an Oberlin filter to remove large solids and carbon beds to remove APFO. DuPont's flow REDACTED 55 Process Description PTFE Dispersion, DuPont (Bates No. E1D1189299-EID179300). 56 R is not clear what happened to the wastewater prior to 2001. A PTFE Dispersion Flow Sheet for 1996 (Bates No. EID185438) and 1999 (Bates No. EID177172) shows two possible paths for the wastewater. One path goes to the Chambers Works and the second path goes to carbon beds. A third path is also shown in a dashed box labeled "Thermal Conv. C-8 Dest.," which probably did not occur. 57 Process Description FEP, DuPont (Bates No. E1D179293-EID179294). 58Ibid. Paustenbach. 59 Ibid. Table 3, Paustenbach. 60 Ibid. Paustenbach. 12 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 15 of 326 PAGEID #: 40177 ' 1963 - 2003 FEP Dispersion Process REDACTED \ TRILLIUM, According to the process description for the FEP Dispersion Process dated August 17, 2001, REDACTED 61 5) 1965 - 2003 Granular Process REDACTED 62 REDACTED The wastewater was not carbon treated because of the purportedly lower amounts of APFO from this process compared to the other processes. J Paustenbach et al. lists the two stacks associated with the drying step in this process, REDACTED 64 6) 1998 - 2003 PFA Process K REDACTED 65 REDACTED According to Paustenbach et ah, both the carbon bed and C-8 scrubber have been in use since the start up of this process. 61 Process Description FEP Dispersion, DuPont (Bates No. EID180755-EID180756). 62 Process Description Granular, DuPont (Bates No. EID180743-EID180744). 63 Ibid. Paustenbach. REDACTED ; REDACTED Paustenbach lists the two stacks associated with the drying process but gives no amounts for the emission from the dryers. 65 Process Description PFA, DuPont (Bates No. EID180751-EID180752). 13 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 16 of 326 PAGEID #: 40178 ( trillium , 7) 1973 - 2003 PFA Dispersion Process This process is similar to the PFA Process K except the product is not dried because it is sold as a liquid dispersion.66.The polymerization takes place in an aqueous medium containing APFO as a dispersing agent. APFO is present in the liquid and solid wastes from the process. Information on the amount of APFO in the waste streams were not available. B. Quantity of APFO Released Into the Environment 1951 - 2003 Between 1951 and 2003 DuPont released APFO into the environment surrounding the Washington Works site by three main routes: 1) to the atmosphere; 2) to the Ohio River; and 3) to the land in material that was sent to on-site and off-site landfills. DuPont also released APFO to the environment from the wastewater sent to DuPont's wastewater treatment plant at Chambers Works at Deepwater, New Jersey. Prior to 1988, wastewater containing APFO was placed in unlined surface impoundments, or "pits," located along the Ohio River. When DuPont closed the surface impoundments in 1988, DuPont sent thousands of tons of soil and sludge from the impoundments for disposal at the Dry Run Landfill. DuPont also allowed Leachate containing APFO from the landfills to enter the Ohio River directly. 1) APFO Releases to the Atmosphere REDACTED 67.68 . REDACTED ^ The particle size of the condensed APFO ranged between 0.1 to 5 micrometers (0.000004 to 0.0002 inches).69,70 Over half of the mass released to the atmosphere in the smallest size range, 0.1-0.3 micrometers (0.000004 to 0.00001 inches). Once in the air these particles could be distributed by the air currents into the surrounding communities. REDACTED 66 Ibid. Paustenbach. 67 Ibid, Paustenbach, Table 3. (Bates No. EID180799). REDACTED 69 Ibid. Paustenbach et al. based on 1996 DuPont emission data collected from the C-8 scrubber exhaust. No data is available before the scrubbers were installed. According to Paustenbach et al. the scrubber may have reduced the particle sizes compared to before the scrubbers were installed. 70 DuPont, Emission Modeling Data Required in Consent Order GWR-2001-019 Section VII.D, December 17, 2001. (Bates No. DJM000280-DJM000320). 14 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 17 (of 326 PAGEID #: 40179 TRILLIUM,,, REDACTED Paustenbach et al. used mass balance calculations to estimate that over 700,000 pounds of PFOA have been released to the atmosphere from the Washington Works facility between 1951 and 2003. Paustenbach et al. published a table of the air emission for each year between 1951 and 2003 which is reproduced in this report as Table 4.7 Table 4. Paustenbach et. al. Estimated Air Emissions 1951-2003 APFO APFO APFO Year (lbs) Year (lbs) Year (lbs) Year 1951 10 1965 7,900 1978 12,000 1991 1952 100 1966 12,000 1979 14,000 1992 1953 300 1967 10,000 1980 14,000 1993 1954 700 1968 8,400 1981 16,000 1994 1955 1,400 1969 6,900 1982 16,000 1995 1956 2,700 1970 4,900 1983 17,000 1996 1957 3,000 1971 4,200 1984 19,000 1997 1958 2,800 1972 5,100 1985 21,000 1998 1959 4,400 1973 6,400 1986 23,000 1999 1960 6,200 1974 6,900 1987 25,000 2000 1961 5,500 1975 5,400 1988 31,000 2001 1962 7,700 1976 7,100 1989 32,000 2002 1963 5,800 1977 9,500 1990 18,000 2003 1964 6,500 Total: APFO (lbs) 18,000 19,000 21,000 25,000 27,000 29,000 26,000 26,000 34,000 32,000 23,000 15,000 7,400 702,000 The quantity of APFO released into the atmosphere, the Ohio River and to the land are reported in several DuPont documents including: C-8 Flow Sheets showing 1996 Total Pounds (Bates No. EID185434EID185438). C-8 Flow Sheets showing 1999 Total Pounds (Bates No. EID177167EID177175). Process Descriptions and C-8 Flow Sheets Dated August 17, 2001 (Bates No. EID179289-EID179306).71 71 Paustenbach et al. estimate for 2000 is in agreement with DuPont's value in Table 5, however, the 1999 values are not in agreement with DuPont's values in Table 4. 15 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 18 of 326 PAGEID #: 40180 ^ \TRILLIUM 1nc Table of 1999 C-8 Usage and Disposal (Bates No. EID180801). Tables of 2000 C-8 Usage and Disposal (Bates No. EID180800 and EID180802). DuPont, Emission Modeling Data Required in Consent Order GWR-2001019 Section VII.D, December 17, 2001 (Bates No. DJM000280DJM000320). Debbie Mulrooney, DuPont Modeling Methodology and Results, April 24, 2002 (Bates No. DJM001064-DJM001076). Table of REDACTED (Bates No. EID 180799). Total air emissions for APFO for 2000 and November 2001 year to date. Letter from R. L. Ritchey to WVDEP re: Consent order, December 21, 2001 (Bates No. EID183431). According to a DuPont memo, in 1984 the total APFO air emissions was 16,000 pounds per year which will increase to 25,000 pounds with implication of the fine powder expansion plan and will increase to 37,000 with the installation of a third dryer. The total air emissions for APFO in 2000 and through November 2001 reported by DuPont to the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection was 31,250 and 25,614 pounds respectively. These results are similar to the estimates reported by Paustenbach et ah. Table 4. A breakdown of the APFO emissions by the seven DuPont processes that used APFO are summarized in Tables 5, 6, and 7 for the years 1996, 1999, and 2000. The 1996 data in Table 5 taken from the 1996 C-8 Flow Sheets show total air emission for APFO of 43,000 pounds compared to the 29,000 pounds estimated by Paustenbach et ah, Table 4.7j Table 6 reports the DuPont emissions from both the 1999 Table of C-8 Usage and Disposal and the 1999 C-8 Flow Sheets. The 1999 air emissions from the three dispersion processes are probably incorrect because Paustenbach et al. reported there were no air emissions and were not included in the total air emissions in Table 6. The total APFO emissions to the atmosphere, Table 6, are 31,208 and 22,940 pounds using the 1999 Table of C-8 Usage and Disposal and the 1999 C-8 Flow Sheets, respectively, are lower than the estimated 34,000 pounds by Paustenbach et al.723 72 Memo from J. A. Schmid to T. M. Kemp and T. L. Schrenk, re: C-8 Meeting Summary 5/2284 - Wilmington, May 23, 1984. (Bates No. EID602999-EID602300). 73Note: The 1996 Fine Power C-8 Flow Sheet shows a filter as a dashed line box which could reduce the air emissions by 13,700 pounds. The FEP and PFA C-8 Flow Sheets show a "Thermal Conv." which could reduce the air emissions by 1,500 and 650 pounds, respectively. If all three devices were being used, the total air emissions would be reduced to 27,150 pounds APFO in Table 5. However, it is not believed that these devices were being used. 16 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 19 of 326 PAGEID #: 40181 \TRILLIUIVLc Table 7 shows the total APFO air emissions for the year 2000 (Bates No. EID 180802) as , REDACTED (Bates No. EID180802),74 REDACTED REDACTED DuPont reported to the WVDEP for the year 2000 (Bates No. EID 183431) and to the 32,000 pounds estimated by Paustenbach et al. for the same year. Although there are some differences in the exact values reported for APFO emissions to the atmosphere, the facts show that during the 1970's, 1980's, and 1990's DuPont directly released several tons of APFO into the atmosphere per year that could be deposited in the communities surrounding the Washington Works site, and these emissions generally increased during that time. Table 5. 1996 APFO Emissions from Taken From C-8 Flow Sheets (Bates No. EID185434EID185438).______ __________ _____________ j_________ _______ Process Total APFO Used (lbs) Air Emissions (lbs) Ohio River (lbs) To Land (lbs) PTFE Fine Powder 33,800 15,200 3,400 0 PTFE Dispersion 24,600 0 00 FEP 40,600 27,100* 6,500 0 FEP Dispersion NA NA NA NA Granular Process 600 0 600 0 PFA Process K 3,800 700 NA NA PFA Dispersion NA NA NA NA Total 103,400** 43,000 10,500 0 * Includes Polykettle vent, Coagulator vent and C-8 Scrubber vent. ** This number may be low because there was no information on the FEP and PFA Dispersion. NA = not available REDACTED Since Paustenbach et al. report no APFO emissions from these processes, only the data from Bates No. EID180802 was used. 17 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 20 of 326 PAGEID #: 40182 * ( trillium inc Table 6. 1999 APFO Usage and Disposal. Results reported are from Bates No. EID180801 and results in parenthesis are from Bates No. EID177167-EID177175. Process Total APFO Used (lbs) Air Emissions (lbs) To Ohio River (lbs) To Land (lbs) PTFE Fine Powder PTFE Dispersion FEP REDACTED FEP Dispersion Granular Process PFA Process K PFA Dispersion Total *Note This value may be incorrect (see text). ** Assumed wastewater went to the Chamber Works. *^Excludes air emissions from the three dispersion processes.* Table 7. 2000 APFO Usage and Disposal. Reports from Bates No. EID180802 and results in parentheses from Bates No. DJ1V1000300 and DJM001068. Total To APFO Air Ohio To Used Emissions River Land Process (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) PTFE Fine Powder PTFE Dispersion FEP REDACTED FEP Dispersion Granular Process PFA Process K PFA Dispersion** Total REDACTED _ Process Description the REDACTED *includes PFA to Shimizu. 18 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 21 of 326 PAGEID #: 40183 * ( trillium 1HC. 2) APFO Releases to the Ohio River APFO was released by DuPont directly into the Ohio River through Outfalls at the Washington Works plant located along the river. Estimated releases to the Ohio River reported in Tables 5, 6, and 7 were REDACTED pounds of APFO for the years 1996, 1999, and 2000. As early as 1991, DuPont detected up to 19.6 parts per billion perfluorooctanoate in the Ohio River near one of its outfalls. ' Beginning in 2001, some of the wastewater was passed through carbon beds to remove APFO from the wastewater before it was released to the Ohio River. The spent carbon from the carbon beds was sent off-site for regenerating the activated carbon where the APFO was decomposed at elevated temperatures. Another DuPont document shows REDACTED value reported in Table 7. DuPont also estimated releases o f : REDACTED pounds APFO in 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively with the reduction caused by improvements in the treatment of the wastewater started in 2001. Paustenbach et al. estimated APFO releases to the Ohio River of approximately 6.000 total pounds between 1951 and 1962, 60,000 total pounds between 1963 and 1980, 150.000 total pounds between 1981 and 1989, 340,000 total pounds between 1990 and 1999, and 71,000 total pounds between 2000 and 2003.77 Thus, as with its releases of C-8 to the air, DuPont's releases of C-8 to the Ohio River steadily increased each decade until DuPont first started treating these releases in 2001. 3) APFO Releases to Landfills Waste material containing APFO was disposed by DuPont in both on-site and off site landfills. The on-site landfills included the "Local Landfill." In addition, DuPont disposed thousands of tons of APFO contaminated soil from the closed surface impoundments in the off-site Dry Run Landfill in 1988. DuPont estimated that in 1999 REDACTED APFO disposed in landfills or the supernate ponds were approximately 12,000 total pounds between 1951 and 1962, 78,000 total pounds between 1963 and 1980, 75,000 total pounds between 1981 and 1989, 19,000 total pounds between 1990 and 1999, and 4,000 total pounds between 2000 and 2003.78 The breakdown of the amount disposed at on-site landfills was not reported. 75Interoffice memo from R J Zipfel to distribution re: C-8 in Water Sample Results Ohio River, Site Test Wells, and New Lbeck Water System, October 3, 1991. (Bates No. EID79110-EID0791158, R.TZ00253-R.TZ009258). REDACTED 77 Ibid. Paustenbach, Figure 7. 78 Ibid. Paustenbach, Figure 7. 19 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 22 of 326 PAGEID #: 40184 \ TRILLIUM 1HC. VI. CHRONOLOGY OF PERFLUOROOCTANOATE ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER AND THE METHODS USED FOR THE ANALYSIS A. 1984 Community Drinking Water Samples Collected by DuPont and Analyzed by the DuPont Experimental Station The first known testing of the community water supply for perfluorooctanoate occurred on March 15 and June 4, 1984 when DuPont collected water samples in the vicinity of the Washington Works by going to gas stations or small grocery stores in the communities and asking to fill a plastic jug with water. ' DuPont later transferred the water sample to 8 ounce glass bottles. The samples were originally analyzed at DuPont's Washington Works laboratory, however, they had problems with "high and inconsistent blanks and data." Because the analytical problems could not be resolved, the samples were then sent to DuPont's Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware for analysis. The Experimental Station reported the results to the Washington Works in an analytical oI report dated June 25, 1984. The water samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/electron capture detector (GC/ECD) using a modification of DuPont's Method ES-567, a method for C-8 in blood. The analytical report states that the samples were freeze dried, derivatized, and analyzed m duplicate. Method ES-567 was modified for water analysis by 1) using a 10 gram (lOmL) aliquot of the sample, 2) lyophilization (freeze drying) for 18-20 hours, and 3) reducing the amount of internal standard perfluorodecanoic acid (C-10) added. The Experimental Station reported the analytical results in units of ng (nanograms) F (fluoride) per g (gram) water or parts per billion (ppb).83,84 The report also states that, "The results are expressed as ppb fluoride where ppb F = 0.688 x ppb perfluorooctanoate." This conversion factor is derived from the fraction by weight of fluorine in perfluorooctanoic acid or 15 x 19/414 = 0.688. Another way of saying this is ppb F x 1.45 = ppb perfluorooctanoate where 1/0.688 = 1.45 or rounded to 1.5.7980123845A linear calibration curve was used for quantitation over a range of 0.4 to 1 ppb as fluoride (F) or 0.6 to 1.5 ppb perfluorooctanoate. No C-8 peak was detected in spiked standards at 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 ppb F. A reproducible and detectable peak was seen 79Memo from J F Doughty to J A Schmidt re: Summary of C-8 in Water Sampling Program, August 29, 1984 (Bates No. EID079096-EID079100 and EID079098.01). 80 Samples were also collected from one of the Washington Work's drinking water fountains and an employee's home. 81 Experimental Station Analytical Report from S. R. Laas to J. F. Doughty, June 25, 1984. (Bates No. EID079099EID079100). 82 Details for the derivatization were not included in Laas memo. DuPont methods for the analysis of C-8 in blood derivatize the C-8 to the methyl ester using methanoic HC1 (3%) followed by the extraction of the esters into hexane. Packed or capillary columns are used for the GC/ECD analysis using C-l 0 as the internal standard. S. S. Stafford (DuPont), Method for the Determination of Perfluorooctanoate in Blood, Water, and Other Materials, December 1982, (Bates No. EID2529536-EID252962). 8' The original blood method used by DuPont was the Wickbold Torch method in which the sample was burned in a hydrogen/oxygen torch where the organic fluorine is converted to inorganic fluoride. The Wickbold Torch method reported the results as total fluoride. The Experimental Station reported the GC/ECD results on the same basis to be consistent with the Wickbold Torch method. 84 This is equivalent ng/mL, ug/L, or ppb based on the density of water of 1 g/mL. 85 This conversion factor for ammonium perfluorooctanoate is 15 x 19/431 = 0.661 and 1/0.661 = 1.51. Thus ppb F x 1.51 = ppb ammonium perfluorooctanoate. 20 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 23 of 326 PAGEID #: 40185 ^ ( trillium ih, at 0.4 ppb F (0.6 ppb perfluorooctanoate) and this concentration was used as the detection limit. J. F. Doughty in a June 14, 1984 memo reported the Experimental Station analytical results as "ppb C-8" after multiplying the Experimental Station's ppb fluoride results by 1.5.86 The results for the Lubeck and Little Hocking Water Association samples, Table 8, are taken from Doughty's June 14, 1984 memo.87 The detection limit by using the 1.5 multiplier changed from 0.4 ppb F to 0.6 ppb C-8. It must be noted that the reporting of the analytical results by the various laboratories used by DuPont changed from "F" and "C-8" in 1984 and to "FC-143" and "APFO" in subsequent years. It is assumed that "C-8" in this case refers to perfluorooctanoate based on the June 25, 1984 analytical report from the Experimental Station which refers to the conversion from ppm F to ppm perfluorooctanoate. However, the 1.5 multiplier used in Doughty's memo could be used to convert ppm fluoride to either perfluorooctanoate, perfluorooctanoic acid, or ammonium perfluorooctanoate.88 No information was provided on the quality control/quality assurance measures used by the Experimental Station. Table 8. March and June 1984 Results for Little Hocking and Lubeck Water Samples Sample C-8* Sample Location Date (PPb) Mason's Village Market - Little Hocking, OH89 3/15/1984 0.6 Powells General Store - Lubeck, WV Mason's Village Market - Little Hocking, OH Powells Store - Lubeck, WV Lubeck Pennzoil - Lubeck, WV ND ( ) = not detected (detection limit) *Experimental Station result as ppm F x 1.5 3/15/1984 6/4/1984 6/4/1984 6/4/1984 1.2 ND (0.6) 1.0 1.5 A DuPont Report issued in December 1982 by S. S. Stafford and titled " Methods for the Determination of Perfluorooctanoate in Blood, Water, and Other Materials" lists Method ES-567 as one of the methods developed by the Experimental Station between 1979 through 1982.90 This 86Memo from J. F. Doughty to J. A. Schmidt re: Update on C-8 in Water Samples, June J4, 1984 (Bates No. EID079098 and EID079098.01). 87 The 1.5 multiplier used in the in Doughty's memo could be used to convert ppm fluoride to either perfluorooctanoate, perfluorooctanoic acid, or its ammonium salt since 1/0.688 or 1/0.661 both equal 1.5 when rounded to two significant figures. 88 The equations for converting ppm fluoride to the various forms of perfluorooctanoate are: 1) ppm F x 4 14/( 15 x 19) = ppm perfluorooctanoic acid; 2) ppm F x 413/(15 x 19) = ppm perfluorooctanoate; and 3) ppm F x 431/(15 x 19) = ppm ammonium perfluorooctanoate. Thus, ppm F x 1.45 = ppm perfluorooctanoic acid, ppm F x 1.45 = ppm perfluorooctanoate, and ppm F x 1.51 = ppm ammonium perfluorooctanoate. Thus, the multiplier in the three equations can be rounded to the 1.5 value used in the August 29, 1984 Doughty memo to convert ppm F to any of these three forms of perfluorooctanoate. 89 The result was changed from 0.8 to 0.6 on 8/28/84 in a handwritten note on the table. Memo from J. F. Doughty to .1. A. Schmidt re: Summary of C-8 in Water Sampling Program, August 29, 1984 (Bates No. EID079096-EID079100 and EID079098.01). 90 S. S. Stafford (DuPont), Methods for the Determination of Perfluorooctanoate in Blood, Water, and Other Materials, December 1982, (Bates No. E1D252953-EID252962). A complete copy of this document including the 21 Case 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 24 of 326 PAGEID #: 40186 ^ \TRILLIUMinc document states that the three steps in the current methods are: (1) Sample Preparation: Lypohilization o f 1 mL sample aliquots. (2) Derivatization: Treatment o f the dried residues with methanoic HCl (3%) followed by extraction o f the methyl esters into hexane. (3) GC Analysis: Electron capture detector with Cw internal standard for quantitation, packed or capillary columnsfor different applications. This method is sometimes referred to as the Stafford method. Additional details on the method for the determination of C-8 in water were attached to a November 18, 1991 memo from R. J. Zipfel.91 For the sample size, a 1 mL aliquot was used for ppm levels of C-8 and 10 mL was used for ppb levels. Before freeze drying, 0.05 mL of 0.05N sodium hydroxide was added. The sample was then frozen and placed in a drying flask which was attached to a lyophilizer to freeze dry the samples for 5 hours for 1 mL samples and 24 hours for 10 mL samples. To the dried residue, 1 mL of methanoic HCl and 0.1 mL internal standard (perfluorodecanoic acid [C-10]) was added and then the sample was heated for one hour at 65 C. After derivatization to the methyl ester, 1 mL hexane and 1 mL water was added and the sample was shaken. The hexane layer was removed for analysis by GC/ECD using a DB-210 capillary column. The instrument calibration used standards prepared from known concentrations of APFO in water blanks. Chromatograms accompanying the memo show one peak labeled C-8 being quantitated. Although the peak shown for C-8 is very small, there appears to be other nearby smaller peaks that may be the C-8 isomers. 1) Detector Response vs. PFOA Isomer REDACTED REDACTED 92 REDACTED 93 REDACTED appendices with the methods was not available. 91 Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 Interlaboratory Meeting, November 18, 1991, (Bates No. EID256133- EID256162). 92 REDACTED (Bates No EID138137-EID138158). 93 The commercial PFOA also contained REDACTED i. 22 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 25 of 326 PAGEID #: 40187 REDACTED * ITRILLIUN/Lc. 94 REDACTED 95 B. 1987 Community Drinking Water Samples Collected by DuPont and Analyzed by the DuPont Experimental Station DuPont collected water samples near the Washington Works facility on March 13, 1987 by going to each location and asking them to fill a plastic bottle with drinking water. The Experimental Station analyzed the samples and the results were reported in an analytical report issued on May 7, 1987 as ppb fluoride.96 This report states that the method used was a modification of Method ES-567 with modifications similar to that used for the 1984 samples. This time the high standard used for the calibration curve was 1.9 ppb F (2.9 ppb C-8). As before, no C-8 peak was detected below 0.4 ppb F (0.6 ppb C-8). The ppb fluoride results reported by the Experimental Station were multiplied by 1.5 to convert the results to ppb C-8, Table 9.97 This appears to be the same method DuPont used for the 1984 samples including the same detection limit. No information was provided on the quality control/quality assurance measures used by the Experimental Station. Table 9. March 1987 Sample Results. Sample Tocation Powells General Store, Lubeck, WV Lubeck - Tubeck Pemizoil, Lubeck, WV Mason's Village Market, Little Hocking, OH 812 20th Street, Vienna, WV ND ( ) = not detected (detection limit) *Experimental Station result as ppm F x 1.5 Sample Date 3/13/1987 3/13/1987 3/13/1987 3/13/1987 C-8* (ppb) 1.9 1.9 ND (0.6) ND (0.6) REDACTED 95 Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 Interl aboratory Meeting, November 18, 1991, (Bates No. EID256133EID256162). 96 Experimental Station Analytical Report from M. J. Vilone and R. M. Vasta to A. J. Playtis, May 7, 1987, (Bates No. EID0790912-EID079093). 97 Interoffice memo from Tony Playtis to Roger Zipfel re: C-8 in Water, May 12, 1987, (Bates No. EID079091) and interoffice memo from Tony Playtis to Roger Zipfel re: C-8 in Water, May 4, 1987, (Bates No. EID079094). 23 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 26 of 326 PAGEID #: 40188 ' ( ,t r il l iu mI INC. C. 1988 and 1989 Community Water Samples Analyzed by the Experimental Station Water samples were collected from the residences of two DuPont employees on May, 12, 1988, November 2 and 11, 1988 and on May 4 and 7, 1989.989'" '100 The Playtis sample was from the Lubeck Public Service District and the Ritenour sample was from the Little Hocking Water Association. Water samples were collected from residential homes, private wells, and the new Lubeck Public Service District in 1990 and/or 1991.101 The samples were analyzed by the Experimental Station. Results reported as ppb C-8 are summarized in Table 10 and are assumed to be the values after the 1.5 multiplier was applied to the Experimental Station results. The result from the Ritenour home was not reported for the November 2, 1988 and May 4, 1989 samples because it was reported that the analysis was not possible due to a contaminated sample. Further details were not given. Again, it appears DuPont used the same analytical method with the same detection limit, however, no details on the method were reported. Table 10. 1988 and 1989 Sample Results. Sample Location Playtis Home - Lubeck, WV Ritenour Home - Little Hocking, OH Playtis Home - Lubeck, WV Ritenour Home - Little Hocking, OH Playtis Home - Lubeck, WV Ritenour Home - Little Hocking, OH ND () = not detected (detection limit) Sample Date 5/12/1988 5/12/1988 11/2/1998 11/7/1988 5/7/1989 5/4/1989 C-8 (ppb) 2.2 ND (0.6) 1.4 Contaminated? 0.73 Contaminated? D. 1990 and 1991 Community Water Samples Analyzed by the Experimental Station DuPont collected water samples from two private wells (Curry and Barber) located in Lubeck, West Virginia in 1990 and 1991 and the samples were analyzed by the Experimental Station.102*The results for C-8 in the private wells. Table 11, are all not detected. The reason for the increase in the detection limit for the 1991 samples was not reported. DuPont also reported results from water samples collected in 1991 from the home taps of two retired DuPont employees (McClusky and Clark) in Lubeck, West Virginia and from the New Lubeck Well, 98 Interoffice memo from Tony Playtis to Roger Zipfel re: C-8 in Groundwater, August 29, 1988, (Bates No. EID079090). 99 Interoffice memo from Tony Playtis to Roger Zipfel re: C-8 in Water, January 30, 1989, (Bates No. EID079089). 100Interoffice memo from Tony Playtis to William E. Crawley re: C-8 in Water Test Results From ESL, June 30, 1988,1987, (Bates No. EID079124). 101 Handwritten and typed pages with C-8 results. (Bates No. EID103018-EID103023, ASH010156, ASH010160ASH1010164). 102Handwritten and typed pages with C-8 results. (Bates No. EID103018-EID103023, ASH010156, ASH010160ASH1010164) and C-8 Sample Summary: 11/90 to Present (Updated 9/13/91). (Bates No. E1D109509-EID10951 1). 24 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 27 of 326 PAGEID #: 40189 ( t r il l iu m ,INC, Table 11. DuPont reported two values for each of the 1991 samples.103 The second value reported, in brackets in Table 11, is the first value multiplied by 1.4 to correct the result for "FC-143." A comment accompanying the data states that, "The 1.4 correction factor is applicable to <= 10 ppb level results."104 Based on this correction factor, the composition of FC-143 would contain 71% linear and 29% branched isomers.105 There was no mention of multiplying the Experimental Station results by 1.5 to convert ppb fluoride to ppm C-8, however, the 0.6 and 1.0 ppb detection limits indicate that the results were reported as ppb C-8 and not as fluoride. The detection limit was raised to 1 ppb for the August 9, 1991 sample with no reason given. The increase in the detection limit occurs just two months after DuPont adopted the Community Exposure Guideline (CEG) for ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) at 1 ug/L (ppb) on June 11, 1991. A second DuPont comment accompanying the data states that, "All results <=10 ppb prior to January 1991 are suspect because of analytical technique accuracy."106 This appears to indicate that after January 1991 the accuracy of the analytical technique improved, however, there was no information on what changed to improve the accuracy nor did DuPont explain the reasons why the analytical inaccuracies were suspect. The only change appears to be multiplying the results by 1.4. No information was provided on the quality control/quality assurance measures used by the Experimental Station. DuPont discusses the 1.4 multiplier in a November 11, 1991 memo from R. J. Zipfel.107 The reason why the Washington Works facility was multiplying the Experimental Station Results by 1.4 was to "account for the isomers of C-8 that were not reported with the main C-8 peak." DuPont acknowledged that CH2M Hill, an outside laboratory, and DuPont's previously reported C-8 results in water only used the main straight chain peak for quantitation. DuPont said, "we have no knowledge of how the isomers behave in the environment [and] any attempt to correct would be misleading." "Therefore, to keep all of the data consistent and not make assumptions about unknown peaks, it was concluded that the Washington Works 1.4 factor was misleading and would not be used." "All previously reported data using the 1.4 factor will be corrected." Thus, according to DuPont, the values in the brackets in Table 11 should not be used. It was noted with the June 23, 1991 new Lubeck Well result that another laboratory, CH2M Hill confirmed the presence of C-8 in the sample, however, additional details were not provided.108 C-8 Sample Summary: 11/90 to Present (Updated 9/13/91). (Bates No. ELD109509-EID109511). <= means less than and equal to. 105 % branched isomers = (1,4x - x)(l 00)/1.4x where x = Concentration of linear C-8. Thus % branched isomers = (1.4 - 1)(100)/1.4 = 40/1.4 = 28.6% 106C-8 Sample Summary: 11/90 to Present (Updated 9/13/91). (Bates No. EID109509-EID109511). 107Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 Interlaboratory Meeting, November 18, 1991, (Bates No. EID256133EID256I62). 108 Handwritten and typed pages with C-8 results. (Bates No. EID103018-EIDI03023, ASH010156, ASH010160ASH1010164). 25 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 28 of 326 PAGEID #: 40190 " \TRILLIUM,HE. Table 11. 1990 and 1991 Sample Results Sample Sample Location Date Curry Private Well - Lbeck, WY 11/28/1990 Barber Private Well - Lbeck, WV 11/28/1990 McClusky Home Tap - Lbeck, WV 5/23/1991 Clark Home Tap - Lubeclc, WV 5/29/1991 New Lubeclc Well 6/23/1991 McClusky Home Tap - Lubeclc, WV, 8/8/1991 Curry Private Well - Lubeclc, WV 8/9/1991 Barber Private Well - Lubeclc, WV 8/9/1991 * The numbers in "[ ]" are after multiplying the result by 1.4. ND () = not detected (detection limit) C-8 (ppb) ND (0.6) ND (0.6) 2.7 [3.8]* 2.7 [3.8]* 1.7 [2.4]* 2.8 [3.9]* ND (1.0) ND (1.0) E. September and October 1991 Water Samples DuPont Experimental Station and CH2M Hill, Montgomery, Alabama In 1991, DuPont authorized CH2M Hill, Montgomery, Alabama to developed a similar GC/ECD analytical technique capable of detecting C-8 at 0.1 ppb.109 DuPont began to qualify CH2M Hill as an outside laboratory by running split water samples with the Experimental Station. In September 1991, DuPont collected water samples from the Ohio River, Washington Works test wells, and the old and new Lubeclc Public Service District ("LPSD") wells and sent the samples to both CH2M Hill and the Experimental Station for analysis.110The comparison of the results from the two laboratories is shown in Table 12. DuPont notes that the "Results from the Experimental Station are approximately two times higher than from CH2M Hill." DuPont reported that, "CH2M Hill experienced analytical difficulties." DuPont further notes that, "CH2M Hill experienced poor surrogate recovery," and that, "[t]hese numbers may be low on the absolute basis." According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency: A surrogate (i.e., a compound that is chemically similar to the analyte group hut is not expected to occur in an environmental sample) should be added to each sample, blank, laboratory control sample (LCS), and matrix spike sample just prior to extraction or processing. The recovery o f the surrogate standard is used to monitor for unusual matrix effects, gross sample processing errors, etc. Surrogate recovery is evaluated for acceptance by determining whether the measured concentration falls within the acceptance limits.111 109 Memorandum from Terry Vandell to Walt Stewart, Meeting Minutes of the On-Site Washington Works Meeting (September 11, 1991,9:00 AM-11:00 AM) Regarding the September 4, 1991 Proposed C-8 Sampling Program, September 19, 1991. (Bates No. EID909790-EID909809). 110 Interoffice memo from R. J. Zipfel to distribution re: C-8 in Water Sample Results Ohio River, Site Test Wells, and New Lubeclc Water System, October 3, 1991 (Bates No. EID909811-EID909819). 111 USEPA SW-846, Method 3500B, Organic Extraction and Sample Preparation, December 1996. 26 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 29 of 326 PAGEID #: 40191 -- ^ I t RILLIUM.c Thus, the purpose of a surrogate is to monitor the performance of the method with each sample. A low surrogate recovery indicates there is at least one systematic error affecting the results. No information was reported on the method used by CH2M Hill, however, the method should be similar to the CH2M Hill method issued the subsequent month (October 1991) which is discussed in the next section. It is assumed that the Experimental Station was using the same method as previously discussed. The detection limit for C-8 for the Experimental Station was 1 ppb, which was higher than the 0.6 ppb previously reported (1984 through 1990). CH2M Hill's detection limit was 0.1 ppb. DuPont did not report what "multiplication factors" were applied to the data from the Experimental Station. Table 12. Comparison of September 1991 CH2M Hill Results to the Experimental Station Results. Sample Location Experimental Station C-8(ppb) CH2M Hill C-8(ppb) Test Well #27 Washington Works 7.1 1.2 Well #331 Washington Works Well MW-4 Washington Works Ohio River -1 & duplicate Ohio River -2 & duplicate Ohio River -3 (near outfall) & duplicate ND (1) 2.7 ND (1) & ND (1) ND (1) & 3.9 19.6 & 16.8 0.1 0.2 ND (0.1) & ND (0.1) ND (0.1) & ND (0.1) 11.0 & 12.0 Ohio River -5 & duplicate Ohio River -6 & duplicate New Lubeck Well - F & duplicate New Lubeck Well - B & duplicate 4.2 & 2.8 ND (1) & 2.0 ND (1) & ND (1) ND (1) &ND (1) 1.1 & 1.1 0.5 & 0.6 ND (0.1) & ND (0.1) 0.3 &ND (0.1) Old Lubeck Well - 1 & duplicate 8.8 & 4.1 NA& 1.1 Old Lubeck Well - 4 & duplicate 4.2 & 2.9 0.9 & 1.7 ND ( ) = not detected (detection limit) NA = not available. In the October 1991 sampling, eight samples were given to each laboratory with four of the samples being unlabeled duplicates.112 The comparison of the results between the two laboratories, Table 13, show the results from the Experimental Station are approximately two times higher than CH2M Hill. The 1.4 multiplication factor was not applied to the Experimental Station Results. The Experimental Station reported a detection limit of 1 ppb which is higher than the 0.6 ppb previously used (1984 to 1990). CH2M Hill achieved the lower detection limit by using a 1000 mL sample size compared to the 10 mL used by the Experimental Station. The Experimental Station used C-10 as an internal standard and CH2M Hill used three internal standards, perfluoroheptanoic acid (C-7), 1,2-dichlorobenzene, and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene. 112 Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 Interlaboratory Meeting, November 18, 1991, (Bates No. EID256133EID256162). 27 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 30 of 326 PAGEID #: 40192 * \TRILLIUIVLc In this round of testing, CH2M Hill used perfluorononanoic acid (C-9) and 11Heicosafluoroundecanoic acid (C-l 1) as surrogates, Table 14. The Experimental Station did not use surrogates.113 According to DuPont's November 18, 1991 memo, "CH2M-Hill reported that their overall recovery of surrogates (C-9 & C -ll) to be approximately 60%."'14 According to the same memo, "If one corrects the CH2M-Hill results for surrogate recovery, their results are close to those reported to the Experimental Station." Thus, DuPont was aware of the relationship between low surrogate recoveries and low C-8 results in the samples and that CH2M Hill's results for C-8 were biased low. CH2M Hill did not analyze matrix spikes with the samples. The Experimental Station reported an overall recovery for C-8 spiking at 5 ppb was 95%, however, there was no indication about the type of spike this was (matrix spike or blank spike). Table 13. Comparison of October 1991 CH2M Hill Results to the Experimental Station Results from Washington Works Test Wells._________________________________ Experimental Station CH2M Hill Sample C-8(ppb) C-8(ppb) Test Well 27 & duplicate 4.7 & 4.3- 2.5 & 3.2 Test Well M4 & duplicate 1.3 & 1.3 0.7 & 0.6 Test Well 331 & duplicate 1.0 & 1.4 0.6 & 0.6 Test Well 33 & duplicate 94 & 100 75 &46 Table 14. Surrogate Recoveries from CH2M Hill October 1991 Analysis C9 C ll Sample % Rec % Rec Test Well 27 & duplicate 63 & 75 45 &46 Test Well M4 & duplicate 87 & 74 1 72 & 45 Test Well 331 & duplicate Test Well 33 & duplicate 76 & 85 78 & 73 49 & 61 34 & 37 By November 1991, DuPont stated that the Experimental Station was not capable of analyzing the volume of samples necessary to support the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Verification Investigation (VI) at the Washington Works facility.115 CH2M Hill was designated to analyze all future water samples for C-8 while the Experimental Station would be used to sporadically check the CH2M Hill results, however, throughout the document review no CH2M Hill results were checked by the Experimental Station. According to a November 18, 1991, DuPont memorandum, the CH2M Hill fully complies with United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA') protocols including "good QA/QC practices, improved sample container control, rigorous documentation of equipment calibrations, reduced ambient impurity Ibid. The use of surrogate compounds by the Experimental Station is questionable. A statement is made that the Experimental Station did not use surrogates is followed with the statement that their results were corrected for surrogate recovery. ^Ibid. 115Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 Interlaboratory Meeting, November 18, 1991, (Bates No EID256133- EID256162). 28 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 31 of 326 PAGEID #: 40193 \TRILLIUK/LC contamination and use of control samples.""6 "The Experimental Station laboratory did not have the volume of work to justify the increased expense fo[r] the EPA procedure."117 Details of how the Experimental Station Laboratory did not comply with EPA protocols were not reported; however, the lack of surrogates, matrix spikes, and blanks are some of the protocols that were lacking in the Experimental Station's data. DuPont cited these reasons as the rationale for switching its water analysis for C-8 to CH2M Hill even though DuPont knew that CH2M Hill was obtaining lower results than the Experimental Station and CH2M Hill's "overall recovery of surrogates (C-9 & C-l 1) to be approximately 60%."118 F. October 1991 Through 1998 Water Samples Analyzed by CH2M Hill Montgomery, Alabama Between October 1991 and 1998 DuPont used CH2M Hill to analyze water samples using REDACTED REDACTED 116 Ibid. 117 Ibid. 118 Ibid. 119 REDACTED October 1991, (Bates No. EID211377-EID211398). 29 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 32 of 326 PAGEID #: 40194 REDACTED ^ TTRILLlUIVLc REDACTED however, a November 18, 1991 DuPont memo points out that CH2M Hill only utilizes the "main straight chain peak."120 1 REDACTED The August 11, 1993 CH2M Hill laboratory report includes quantitation reports and chromatograms for the calibration and samples.*121 CH2M Hill's calibration used standards at 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, and 2 ug/L. Calibration check standards at 1 ug/L were run throughout the ,20Memorandum, from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 InterLaboratory Meeting and includes 8/31/92 CH2M Hill Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Soil/Sediment (Bates No. EID256133-EID256162). 121 CH2M Hill Hill Laboratory Report for 7/22/93 samples, August 11, 1993. (Bates No. E1D181885-ETD181987). 30 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 33 of 326 PAGEID #: 40195 ' (TRILLIUMTM,. analysis and after the last sample. Surrogates appear to be spiked at a concentration of 1 ug/L in the samples. The chromatograms indicate that the analysis was performed using one injection, which was split between two columns and recombined before entering the detector. Thus, each chromatogram contains the peaks from both columns (i.e., two C-8 peaks, one for each column). The peak identified as C-8 in the chromatograms has additional smaller peaks surrounding it which are the branched isomers of C-8 for both the standards and the samples. The peaks for the branched isomers do appear to be used in the quantitation. REDACTED _ The method reports a MDL of 0.011 ppb for the separatory funnel extraction and 0.0066 ppb for the continuous extraction.122 Spike recoveries for FC-143 ranged from 55-62% at 0.1-0.4 ppb for the separatory funnel extraction and from 38-45% at 0.1-0.4 ppb for the continuous extractor. CH2M Hill reported their results as FC-143 in units of ug/L (ppb). 1) November 1991 Ohio River Samples Near New LPSD Well Field DuPont collected water samples on November 19, 1991 from the Ohio River. Three samples were collected near the new LPSD Well Field along with a field blank.123 The first sample was collected on the West Virginia side about 40 feet from the shore. The second sample was collected in the middle and the third sample about 40 feet from the shore on the Ohio side. The samples were collected at a depth of 8 feet below the river surface. FC-143 was present above 1 ppb in all three river samples. Results are shown in Table 15. The surrogate recoveries for the three river samples, Table 15, ranged between 45 and 66%. According to the CH2M Hill's laboratory report, the surrogate recoveries were within the acceptable QC criteria, however, the QC limits were not reported.124 No matrix spikes samples were run with this set of samples. Table 15. Results for FC-143 and Surrogates Recoveries for the November 19, 1991 Ohio River Samples._____________________________________ Surrogate Surrogate Surrogate Sample LPSD - New Wells, WV Side River LPSD - New Wells, Mid River LPSD - New Wells, Ohio Side Field Blank ND ( ) = not detected (detection limit) FC-143 (ug/L) 1.4 1.6 1.7 ND (0.1) C-9 % Ree 62 66 58 65 C-10 % Ree 45 53 49 66 C-ll % Ree 50 54 48 70 Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Water, CH2M Hill, October 1991, (Bates No. EID149530-EID149550). 123Memo from Daniel A Weber to distribution list re: 11/19/91 C-8 Sample Collection Summary, November 20, 1991. (Bates No. EID949490-EID949491) and Memo from Mike to Roger re: 11/19/91 results. (Bates No. EID949449). 124 CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 10/8/91 samples, November 27, 1991. (Bates No. EID949493-E1D949517). 31 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 34 of 326 PAGEID #: 40196 * \TRILLIUIVLc 2) February 1992 New LPSD Well Samples CH2M Hill analyzed water samples that DuPont collected from the new LPSD Service Division wells on February 25, 1992.125 The sample results and surrogate recoveries are shown in Table 16. No results were reported for the blank spikes (LCS), matrix spike (MS), or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) for these samples. CH2M Hill used the same method as before. DuPont continued using CH2M Hill to run drinking water samples even though CH2M Hill's method previously was shown to produce low results and low surrogate recoveries. DuPont does not sample and analyze the drinking water from the surrounding community for FC-143 for another eight years until January 2000. Table 16. Results for FC-143 and Surrogates for the February 25, 1992 New Lubeck Public Service District Wei Samples Surrogate Surrogate Surrogate FC-143 C-9 C-10 C-ll Sample (ug/L) % Ree % Ree % Ree LPSD Well A 0.2 78 83 78 LPSD Well B 0.4 73 " 77 72 LPSD Well F 0.09 J 82 82 73 J = estimated 3) CH2M Hill FC-143 Spike Recoveries QC data for blank spikes (LCS) and matrix spikes (MS) were available for three of the CH2M Hill laboratory reports dated June 8, 1993, August 11, 1993 and June 13, 1995. The June 8, 1993 report for water samples collected from DuPont's Local Landfill reported poor recoveries for the original FC-143 spikes for the LCS, MS and MSD, Table 17.126 The spiking concentrations were 1 ug/L for the LCS and 2 ug/L for the MS/MSD while the original un-spiked value was 0.6 ug/L for the MS/MSD. Surrogates recoveries were also poor. Quality control (QC) recovery criteria were not reported. CH2M Hill re extracted these samples and reported increased FC-143 and surrogate recoveries, Table 17.127 This indicates that there is a correlation between the surrogate recoveries and the amount of FC-143 reported. Low surrogate recoveries lead to low FC-143 results. 125 Letter from W M Stewart to William R Packard (Lubeck) re Feb 1992 results with attached CH2M Hill Form I, March 23, 1992 (Bates No. EID195965-EID195968). 126 CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 5/19/93 samples, June 8,1993. 127 The sample used for the re-extract for the MS/MSD was not the same as the original extraction. In addition, a smaller aliquot (50 mL vs. 1000 mL) and a higher spiking level (20 ug/L vs. 2 ug/L) was used for the MS/MSD re extract. The original value for the un-spiked sample used for the re-extract of the MS/MSD was 37 ug/L. The re extraction was performed beyond CH2M Hill's holding time for extractions. 32 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 35 of 326 PAGEID #: 40197 I t RILLIUK/Lc Table 17. QC Sample Results from June 8, 1993 Laboratory Report FC-143 Surrogate Surrogate Spike C-9 C-10 Sample % Ree % Ree % Ree TCS 21 12 11 MS 15 7 7 MSD 15 12 15 TCS (Re-extract) 64 83 91 MS (Re-extract) 80 70 62 MSD (Re-extract) 96 109 107 Surrogate C-ll % Ree 13 6 10 86 65 89 The LCS and MS/MSD recoveries for the August 11, 1993128 and June 13, 1995129130 reports are shown in Table 18. The samples used for the MS/MSD were from wells at Washington Works. QC Sample TCS MS MSD LCS MW13A MS MW13AMSD CH2M Hill Report Date 8/11/93 8/11/93 8/11/93 6/13/95 6/13/95 6/13/95 FC-143 Spike Added (ug/L) 1 2 2 1 4 4 FC-143 Spike % Ree 87 78 82 83 89 87 C-9 % Ree 71 68 51 67 57 38 C-10 % Ree 63 39 32 81 27 18 C -ll % Ree 37 33 27 60 72 60 It should be noted that the C-9 surrogate used by CH2M Hill and later by Lancaster Taboratories is also found in the environment.'30 In 2000, about 9% of the perfluorocarboxylic acids released into the environment was C-9 with lesser amounts of the higher carbon number analogs. The principal manufacture and use of C-9 are in Eastern Asia. The commercial C-9 produced in Japan is a mixture of linear C-7 to C-13 perfluoro ammonium salts. However, C-9 is also a by-product of 3M's electrochemical fluorination process and may contain branched-chain isomers from this process. All of this may lead to problems in using C-9 for a surrogate and questions about the purity of the surrogates. G. November 1998 RCRA Facility Investigation - CH2M Hill CH2M Hill analyzed the soil and groundwater collected for DuPont's first round of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) at the Washington 128 Letter from Angel Kionka (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: Analytical Data for Dry Run, July 7, 1995, (Bates No. EIC07118-EID071207). Note: The laboratory changed its name to Quality Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (QAL). 129 CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 7/22/93 samples, August 11, 1993. (Bates No. EID181885-EID181987). 130Konstantinos Prevedours, et al. Sources, Fate and Transport of Perfluorocarboxylates, Environmental Science & Technology, 2006 40(1) pp. 32-44. JO Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 36 of 326 PAGEID #: 40198 ' ( ,t r il l iu mI INC. Works facility.131 The groundwater samples were collected in November 1998. However, the data validation lists both CH2M Hill and Lancaster Laboratories, located in Lancaster, Pennsylvania as the laboratories performing the analysis.132It is not clear to what extent Lancaster Laboratories was involved with these samples. This was around the time period that CH2M Hill's Montgomery, Alabama laboratory inexplicably ceases operations. The method used for FC-143 in the first round of sampling was listed as CH2M Hill's "Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Water" described above. Environmental Standards of Valley Forge, Pennsylvania performed the data validation on the groundwater results and issued a draft report on June 4, 1999.133 The FC-143 results for nine groundwater samples (including a field duplicate) and a field blank were validated. Eight of the samples including the field blank were qualified because of low surrogate and MS/MSD recoveries or high differences in the results between field duplicates: Very low recoveries (<10 %) for one or more of the surrogates resulted in three samples being flagged "L" indicating that FC-143 was present and the reported value may be biased low. The actual value is expected to be higher. All samples had acceptable recoveries (QC criteria was not reported) for the C-9 surrogate. Very low recoveries (<10 %) for FC-143 spikes in the MS and MSD resulting in the sample that was spiked being flagged "L." One sample and its field duplicate were flagged "J" because of poor precision between the duplicates (RPD = 68%). Three samples (including the field blank) with reported FC-143 results below the PQL were flagged "R," as unusable. One or more of the surrogates had very low recoveries (<10 %). Sometime in the Fall of 1998, CH2M Hill's Montgomery, Alabama laboratory ceases operations for unknown reasons. H. February 1999 RCRA Facility Investigation Ground Water Samples Analyzed by Lancaster Laboratories, Lancaster, Pennsylvania By the second round of DuPont's RFI groundwater sampling during February, 1999, Lancaster Laboratories was analyzing the samples for FC-143.134'135'136 Lancaster was using the 131 RCRA Facility Investigation Report DuPont Washington Works Washington, West Virginia, USEPA Permit Number WVD04-587-5291, DuPont Remediation Group, June 30, 1999, (Bates No, EID 109642-EID109786). 132Draft "Quality Assurance Review of the RFI Samples Collected on September 3, 4, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, and November 17 and 18, 1998," Environmental Standards, Inc., June 4, 1999, (Bates No. EID149626-EID149737) 133 Ibid. 134Quality Assurance Review of the RFI Groundwater 2ndRound Samples Collected on February 2 and 3, 1999, for the DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, Washington Works RCRA Facility Investigation, Environmental Standards, Inc., May 20, 1999, (Bates No. EID149605-EID149625). 34 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 37 of 326 PAGEID #: 40199 \TRILLIUM,c October 1991 CH2M Hill method.1356371389Environmental Standards, Inc. validated the FC-143 results and issued their findings in reports dated May 20, 1999 and June 4, 1999.138,139 The FC-143 results for eleven groundwater samples (including a field duplicate) were validated. Nine of the samples "should be considered biased low" because of low surrogate, LCS and MS/MSD recoveries: The results for two samples were flagged "B" for the presence of FC-143 in the associated laboratory blank. Very low recoveries (<10 %) and/or low recoveries (10 % <R <50 %) for one or more of the surrogates. All positive results except for one sample "should be considered biased low and have been flagged 'L' (unless previously flagged 'B')." All samples had acceptable recoveries (QC criteria was not reported) for the C-9 surrogate. Very low recoveries (<10 %) for FC-143 spikes for the MS and a low recovery (10 % <R <50 %) for the MSD. The sample that was spiked was flagged "L," and the result "should be considered biased low." A low recovery (10 % <R <50 %) for FC-143 was observed for the LCS. All positive results "should be considered biased low and have been flagged 'L' (unless previously flagged 'B')." The precision for one sample and it's field duplicate was poor (RPD = 68%). No data was qualified because the results were previously flagged "L" due to low LCS and surrogate recoveries. DuPont compared the results of the first and second round of groundwater sampling and stated that the FC-143 results "showed that many, but not all, second round results for FC-143 were higher than the first round results."140 DuPont said that it was "investigating possible differences in the FC-143 standard used by the different laboratories for calibration and spiking in an attempt to explain the generally higher FC-143 results found during the second round of 135 Quality Assurance Review of the RFI Groundwater 2nd Round Samples Collected on February 2 and 3, 1999, for the DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, Washington Works RCRA Facility Investigation, Environmental Standards, Inc., June 4, 1999, (Bates No. EID 149552-EID149604). 136Letter from DuPont to EPA Region III, August 31, 2001, Response to Request for lnfonnation dated July 24, 2001, Response to Request No. 12. 137 RCRA Facility Investigation Report DuPont Washington Works Washington, West Virginia, USEPA Permit Number WVD04-587-5291, DuPont Remediation Group, June 30, 1999, (Bates No, EID109642-EID109786). 138 Quality Assurance Review of the RFI Groundwater 2nd Round Samples Collected on February 2 and 3, 1999, for the DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, Washington Works RCRA Facility Investigation, Environmental Standards, Inc., May 20, 1999, (Bates No. EID149605-EID149625). 139 Quality Assurance Review of the RFI Groundwater 2nd Round Samples Collected on February 2 and 3, 1999, for the DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, Washington Works RCRA Facility Investigation, Environmental Standards, Inc., June 4, 1999, (Bates No. EID149552-E1D149604). 140 RCRA Facility Investigation Report DuPont Washington Works Washington, West Virginia, USEPA Permit Number WVD04-587-5291, DuPont Remediation Group, June 30, 1999, (Bates No, EID109642-EID109786). 35 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 38 of 326 PAGEID #: 40200 * \ tr illiu m ,nc groundwater analysis." DuPont also states that, "In addition, FC-143 analysis at each laboratory generally gave poor or imprecise spike recoveries as discussed in Section 4.1.3, resulting in qualification of validated FC-143 results as estimated." Two groundwater results141 were qualified as unusable "primarily due to very low spike recoveries associated with non-detect FC-143 results."142 A third round of sampling of the groundwater was conducted to "verify this discrepancy," however, the results were not available for review. The results of DuPont's "investigation" are not known. I. 2000 through October 2001 LPSD Water Samples Analyzed by Lancaster Laboratories, Lancaster, Pennsylvania Lancaster Laboratories analyzed drinking water samples collected from the new wells used by the Lubeck Public Service District (LPSD) and/or the water main from LSPD building on January 19, 2000,143 August 15, 2000,144 October 31, 2000,145 February 28, 2001,146 June 15, 2001,147 and August 14, 2001.148 All of these samples were analyzed by Lancaster using CH2M Hill's October 1991 "Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Water" with some revisions. During the Initial Demonstration of Capability (IDC) of the CH2M Hill method, Lancaster Laboratories reported low spike recoveries (20%) for FC-143 and the surrogates which were reported to be in agreement with historical data from CH2M Hill.149*The CH2M Hill method was used even with the poor recoveries in the IDC. Results from the six rounds of LPSD water samples analyzed by Lancaster Laboratories are reported in Table 19 along with the surrogate recoveries.'30 Lancaster reported the results as "FC-143" with a MDL of 0.029 ug/L in their laboratory reports. Lancaster reported results between the MDL and the reporting limit (0.1 ug/L) with a "J" qualifier (estimated). Note that one of the modifications Lancaster made to the method was the replacement of the C-10 surrogate used by CH2M Hill with perfluorododecanoic acid (C-12)151 Lancaster reported the percent l41Draft "Quality Assurance Review of the RFI Samples Collected on September 3, 4, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, and November 17 and 18, 1998," Environmental Standards, Inc., June 4, 1999, (Bates No. EID149626-EID149737). 142RCRA Facility Investigation Report DuPont Washington Works Washington, West Virginia, USEPA Permit Number WVD04-587-5291, DuPont Remediation Group, June 30, 1999, (Bates No, EID109642-EID109786). UlLetter from R L Ritcher to James C Cox (Lubeck) re LPSD Water Sample Results 1/19/2000 with attached Lancaster Form 1, February 17, 2000. (Bates No. EID1959651-EID195968) 144Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 8/15/00 with attached Lancaster Form I, October 4, 2000. (Bates No. EID185155-ETD185160). Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 10/31/00 with attached Lancaster Form I, April 26, 2001. (Bates No. EID185172-EID185181) Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 2/28/01 with attached Lancaster Form I, April 2, 2001. (Bates No. ETD185166-E1D185171) Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 6/15/01, with attached Lancaster Form 1, July 18, 2001. (Bates No. E1D718144-EID718149). 148 Lancaster laboratory Form Is for Lubeck samples collected 8/14/01. (Bates No. CFO 16692-CFO16695). 149Draft Proposal, Determination of FC-143 in Water: PBMS Method Development and Validation, Lancaster Laboratories, November 28, 2000, (Bates No. EID150093-EID150285). The results reported for the 10/31/00 samples are the out of hold results for the ethyl ether extraction. The results for the modified MTBE extraction were not being used by DuPont in Tables listing the Lubeck results (Bates EID 195208). 151 "FC-143 in Water/Wastewater," Lancaster Laboratories (Analysis #2324)," August 6, 1999, (Bates No. 36 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 39 of 326 PAGEID #: 40201 J jf L , ' ( tr illiu m , surrogate recoveries for the January 19, 2000 samples, however, in the subsequent rounds, Lancaster only mentioned which surrogates were outside the QC criteria ("Out" in Table 19) without disclosing the percent recoveries. Surrogates that were not mentioned by Lancaster are assumed to have met the QC criteria ("In" in Table 19). Over half of the surrogates did not meet the QC criteria. In fact, only one out of 23 samples met the QC criteria for all three surrogates. Although the percent recoveries for C-9 in the January 19, 2000 samples were poor (7, 10, and 21%), this surrogate still met the QC criteria because of the extremely low recovery minimum (1%) set by Lancaster. This extremely low recovery minimum is why all except one of the C-9 surrogate recoveries met the QC criteria, Table 19. The C -ll surrogate also had a low minimum recovery criterion, 13%, which was later lowered to 11%. C -ll recoveries were still outside the QC criteria (assumed on the low side) in 16 out of 23 samples. The C-12 surrogate with a higher recovery minimum, 50%, was outside the QC criteria in all but two samples. Such low minimum recovery criteria for the surrogates indicates that the method cannot produce results on a consistent basis. QC criteria of 1 to 50% for the recovery of the C-9 surrogate are unacceptable for an accurate analytical method. E ID 149448-E ID 149458). 37 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 40 of 326 PAGEID #: 40202 \ TRILLIUM,, Table 19. Results for Water Samples Collected From the LPSD Wells and Analyzed by Lancaster Surrogate Surrogate Surrogate FC-143 C-9 C -ll C-12 Sample Date (ug/L) % Rec % Rec % Rec LPSD Well A LPSD Well B 1/19/00 1/19/00 0.80 0.440 21 10 11 9 5 O3 LPSD Well F 1/19/00 0.313 7 43 LPSD Well A 8/15/00 0.535 In Out Out LPSD Well B 8/15/00 0.159 In Out Out LPSD Well F 8/15/00 0.073 J In Out Out LPSD Bid Main 8/15/00 0.58 In Out Out LPSD Well A 10/31/00 0.672 In In Out LPSD Well B 10/31/00 0.492 In In Out LPSD Well F 10/31/00 0.196 In In Out LPSD Bid Main 10/31/00 0.692 In In Out LPSD Well A 2/28/01 0.648 In In In LPSD Well B 2/28/01 0.638 Out In In Lubeck Well F 2/28/01 0.212 In In Out LPSD Bid Main 2/28/01 0.499 In Out Out Lubeck Well A 6/15/01 0.220 In Out Out Lubeck Well B 6/15/01 0.555 In Out Out Lubeck Well F 6/15/01 0.065 J In Out Out LPSD Bid Main 6/15/01 0.143 In Out Out Lubeck Well A 8/14/01 0.270 In Out Out Lubeck Well B 8/14/01 0.236 In Out Out Lubeck Well F 8/14/01 0.055 J In Out Out LPSD Bid Main 8/14/01 0.244 In Out Out Surrogate Limits -- 1-50 13-88 50-150 In - within QC criteria, Out = outside QC criteria J = estimated, NA = not available The spike recoveries for FC-143 spiked into method blanks (LCS and LCSD) and into the Lubeck samples (MS and MSD) are shown in Table 20. Values for spike recoveries and QC recovery criteria were reported only for the January 19, 2000 samples. The spike recoveries reported in the other rounds of sampling were only reported as within, "In," or outside, "Out," of the QC criteria. None of the reported MS and MSDs met the QC spike recovery criteria. Only one of the LCS/LCSD samples failed to met the QC spike recovery criteria.152 However, the For the 8/15/00 samples, the FC-143 recovery for the LCS, MS, and MSD were outside the QC criteria. The samples were re-extracted past their holding time and tliis time the LCS met the QC criteria. However only the original results were reported. 38 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 41 of 326 PAGEID #: 40203 " \TRILLIUM,,c minimum spike recovery QC criteria, of 3%, is set very low. Even though the 9% recovery for the January 19, 2000 LCS was above the minimum spike recovery QC criteria, this shows that the method yields poor FC-143 spike recoveries in laboratory blank water, a matrix in which one would expect little to no interferences. QC criteria of 3 to 55% for the recovery of FC-143 are unacceptable for an accurate analytical method. The poor FC-143 spike recoveries show that the method results are biased low. Table 20. Lancaster's Results for QC Samples. LCS LCSD FC-143 FC-143 Sample Date % Rec % Rec 1/19/00 9-- 8/15/00 Out -- MS FC-143 % Rec 'k Out MSD FC-143 % Rec * Out 10/31/00 2/28/01 In** In** In -- -- Out** -- Out** 6/15/01 8/14/01 In -- Out Out -- -- Out** Out** Recovery Limits 3-55 3-55 3-55 3-55 In = within QC criteria, Out = outside QC criteria * Not reported, background >4 times spike level. **RPD between MS and MSD or LCS and LCSD did not meet QC criterion (Criterion was not reported). The method used for the above analysis is listed in the laboratory reports as No. 2324, FC143 by GC/ECD 10/91 with the sample prepared by No. 2325, FC-143 10/91. Lancaster Laboratories tried to make "minor modifications" to the extraction procedure to improve recoveries. An August 6, 1999 method revision (Analysis #2324) adds perfluorododecanoic acid (C-12) and removes C-10 as one of the surrogates for the method.153 The initial calibration included five levels of standards. The standards were made from technical APFO obtained from DuPont and were ethylated with ethanoic HC1 by Lancaster. FC-143 was calibrated for each of the four major peaks (straight-chain and three isomer peaks). The concentration attributed to each peak was determined from the ratio of each peak in comparison to the total.154 To quantitate FC143, Lancaster added the concentrations for each of the four peaks. Lancaster used the average RRF for the initial calibration when the %RSD was < 20%. If the %RSD exceeded 20%, then a linear or quadratic fit was used as long as the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.99. Samples were bracketed with continuing calibration verification (CCY) standards with a % drift criteria not to exceed 20%. If the CCV exceeds the criteria for one of the two columns then only the column that passes the % drift criteria is used for quantitation. To quantitate APFO in a sample, Lancaster added the concentrations for each of the four peaks to obtain a total concentration of APFO. The total APFO results for the primary column and the confirmation 153 "FC-143 in Water/Wastewater," Lancaster Laboratories (Analysis #2324)," August 6, 1999, (Bates No. E ID 149448-E ID 149458). 154According to Lancaster, "The total concentration for all four components should equal the concentration for the level." 39 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 42 of 326 PAGEID #: 40204 RILLIUMINC. analysis were compared and if the %D between the two results were < 40%, the lowest of the two results were used. The results are "flagged" if the %D exceeds 40%. The lower of the results for the surrogates were also reported. The method includes the analysis of a deionized water blank. LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD. The holding time for samples from the date of collection to the date of extraction was 14 days and extracts should be analyzed within 40 days of extraction. The reporting limit for this method was 0.1 ug/L and the MDL was 0.02 ug/L. Based on the standard used, the FC-143 results reported by Lancaster was the ammonium salt APFO. The sample preparation procedure was not included in this method, however, the method references Lancaster Laboratories Analysis #2325, "Extraction of Low-Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater," as the sample preparation method. As the sample preparation method for the above analysis, Lancaster Laboratories used Analysis #2325FC, "Extraction of Low-Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater," which was first initiated on April 26, 1999 and issued on January, 6, 2000, revision 2 was issued October 20, 2000, REDACTED 155,156 Qnjy secon(j and third revisions were available for review. In the second revision the extraction solvent was changed to methyl tertiary-butyl ether REDACTED 1*557 REDACTED The second revision of the extraction method used MTBE as a solvent and was a simpler method REDACTED 1) Extraction Modification Using MTBE October 31, 2000 LPSD Samples According to an October 3, 2000 DuPont email from Michael D Aucoin, Lancaster has been using the CH2M Hill method for over a year.158*In addition, Lancaster was using the CH2M Hill method "as per your [DuPont's] initial instructions." The email also states that: "Due to the very involved sample preparation protocol and generally poor spike recoveries observed, Lancaster undertook an evaluation of alternatives to the CH2M Hill REDACTED (see October 20, 2000 extraction revision in the previous paragraph). The step involved taking the extract to dryness, which according to Lancaster may be contributing to poor spike recoveries, is eliminated using MTBE. The October 31, 2000 LPSD samples were analyzed using the MTBE extraction 155 Lancaster Labs, Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater, Analysis #2325FC Rev 2 (Bates No EID 149401 -EID 149411). EID 124578-EID124593). REDACTED (Bates No " Note that the second revision states that the extraction solvent was changed from the first revision. The change was probably from ethyl ether in the CH2M Hill method to MTBE. 158 Email from Michael D Aucoin to Roger J Zipfel re Laboratory Proposal FC-143, October 3, 2000. (Bates No EID545530) 40 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 43 of 326 PAGEID #: 40205 Ttr illiu m , procedure.159,160 The results using the MTBE extraction are shown in Table 21. At DuPont's request, Lancaster re-extracted the samples using the original ethyl ether extraction; however, the extraction was performed past the method hold time.*161 Comparison of the results for the LPSD samples extracted both ways show that the FC143 results for the MTBE extraction were between 1.1 to 2 times higher than with the ethyl ether extraction, Table 21. However, surrogates recoveries continued to be outside the QC criteria. No LCS, MS, or MSD were reported for the MTBE extraction. As discussed in the previous section, the next revision of the extraction procedure REDACTED Table 21. Comparison of GC/ECD Results from Ethyl Ether and MTBE Extraction Sample Ethyl Ether Extraction MTBE Extraction Sample Date FC-143 ( ug/L) FC-143 (ug/L) LPSD Well A 10/31/2000 0.672 0.79 LPSD Well B 10/31/2000 0.492 0.81 LPSD Well F 10/31/2000 0.196 0.40 LPSD Bid Main 10/31/2000 0.629 0.67 2) GC/MS Confirmation Analysis Lancaster also developed a GC/MS method (Analysis #0495) for confirmation of FC-143 in water and wastewater in December 2000 and revised the method on February 15, 2001.162 This method was used to confirm the presence of FC-143 in water and wastewater analyzed by Lancaster Laboratories Analysis #2324/2325 (GC/ECD) and used the same extract as the GC/ECD method. The initial calibration included five levels of standards. The standards were made from technical APFO obtained from DuPont and were ethylated with ethanoic HC1 by Lancaster. Lancaster used the average RRF for the initial calibration when the %RSD was < 20%. If the %RSD exceeded 20%, then a linear or quadratic fit was used. A CCV was run at the beginning of every 12-hour shift with a % drift criteria not to exceed 20 %. The m/z 69 ion abundance was used for quantitation. Compound identification was made based on the retention time and the agreement of the abundance of all ions (>10 % of m/z 69) within 20% of the reference spectrum. The detection limit for this method was 0.1 ug/L. The GC/MS method (Analysis # 0495) was used for confirmation for the February 28,163June 15,164and August 14, 2001165 Lubeck samples, Table 22. Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 10/31/00, April 26, 2001, (Bates No. EID185172-EID185181). 6 Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 10/31/00 with attached Lancaster Form 1, April 26, 2001. (Bates No. EID 185172-EID 185181). 161 Although DuPont reported both the MTBE extraction and ethyl ether extraction results to the LPSD on April 26, 2001, DuPont generally only used the ethyl ether extraction data in their data tables (Bates No. EID 195208). "GC/MS Confirmation of FC-143 in Water/Wastewater (Analysis #0495),". Lancaster Laboratories, February 15, 2001, (Bates No. EID 149417-EID149429). Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 2/28/00, April 2,2001, (Bates No. EID 185166-EID185171). 41 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 44 of 326 PAGEID #: 40206 ' Ttrillium,, Table 22. Comparison of GC/ECD Results to GC/MS Confirmation (Ethyl Ether Extraction) for 2001 LPSD Samples Sample LPSD Well A LPSD Well B Sample Date 2/28/2001 2/28/2001 GC/ECD FC-143 (ug/L) 0.648 0.638 GC/MS Confirmation FC-143 (ug/L) 0.22 0.45 LPSD Well F 2/28/2001 0.212 0.100 LPSD Bid Main 2/28/2001 0.499 0.32 LPSD Well A 6/15/2001 0.220 0.431 LPSD Well B 6/15/2001 0.555 0.321 LPSD Well F 6/15/2001 0.065 J ND (0.09) LPSD Bid Main 6/15/2001 0.143 ND (0.09) LPSD Well A 8/14/2001 0.270 0.21 LPSD Well B 8/14/2001 0.236 0.171 LPSD Well F 8/14/2001 0.055 J ND (0.09) LPSD Bid Main 8/14/2001 0.224 0.206 ND () = not detected (detection imit) J = estimated J. 1999 - 2001 Lancaster Laboratories FC-143 Method Development To Improve Recoveries Starting in October 1999, Lancaster Laboratories attempted to develop a method to analyze FC-143 based on the EPA 552.2, a method for haloacetic acids by GC/ECD.166 This is discussed in a series of emails between Lancaster Laboratories and DuPont between October 1999 and October 2000. The method is similar to EPA 552.2 and uses MTBE as the extraction solvent; however, the Lancaster procedure derivatized the acid to the ethyl ester instead of the methyl ester in EPA 552.2. Studies conducted in October 1999 showed FC-143 spike recoveries averaging 98% (RSD = 8%) based on four spiked samples with good surrogate recoveries (80 to 120%). However, the MDL was too high and Lancaster continued to refine the method to obtain a lower detection limit. By April 2001, Lancaster had submitted two methods for the analysis of FC-143 in water with improved surrogate and FC-143 spike recoveries over the CH2M Hill procedure. The first method known as the "low-level method" was a GC/MS procedure using MTBE as the extraction solvent. The second method, known as the "high-level method" used solid phase microextraction, (SPME) followed by analysis by GC/MS. In both methods, FC-143 was derivatized to the ethyl ester.1645 164 Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 6/15/01, July 18, 2001, (Bates No. EID718144-EID718149). 165 Lancaster Laboratories Form Is for LPSD samples collected 8/14/01. (Bates No. CF016692-CF016695). Email from N. J. Bornholm (Lancaster) to Michael D Aucoin re: FC143, October 4, 1999. (Bates No. EID150418). 42 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 45 of 326 PAGEID #: 40207 ' I trillium , 1) Low-Level Method For the low-level method, the sample was extracted by "Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater (Analysis #0813FC)"167168and analyzed by GC/MS by "FC-143 in Water and Wastewater by GC/MS (Analysis # 0616).1,168 One liter of sample was placed in a separatory funnel, and the surrogate was added. The pH was adjusted to greater than 12 with sodium hydroxide. The aqueous solution was extracted with methylene chloride, and the methylene chloride was discarded. The pH was then adjusted to less than 1.5 with sulfuric acid and extracted with MTBE. The MTBE layer was filtered through sodium sulfate and placed in a K-D apparatus. The aqueous phase was extracted two more times with MTBE, and the MTBE portions were filtered through sodium sulfate and added to the K-D apparatus. The MTBE was concentrated at 80-85C to less than four milliliters. Ethanol was added to the MTBE and nitrogen evaporated at 35C to one milliliter. The sample was then placed in a vial with sulfuric acid. The vial was capped, and placed in an oven at 63-67C for one hour to derivatize the FC-143. The sample was removed from the oven and mixed with 1 mL methylene chloride and 1 mL water. The methylene chloride layer was removed and washed by mixing with water. The methylene chloride layer was removed and filtered through glass wool and sodium sulfate. The volume was made up to one milliliter with methylene chloride and placed in a vial for analysis. The initial calibration is achieved using six concentration levels made from ethyl perfluorooctanoate.169 The reported MDL (seven spikes) was 0.078 ppb when spiked at 0.25 ppb.170The LOQ was 0.1 ppb. The average spike recovery from the accuracy and precision study (quad study) for the low-level method was 78% with a standard deviation of 0.1012 ug/L based on a spike level of 2.5 ppb - 25 times greater than the reported method detection limit. The surrogate compound, perfluorononanoic acid, had an average recovery of 92% at this same concentration. Studies also showed that spikes of FC-143 at 0.1 ppb into a sample from the Washington Works site (unspiked result 0.14 ug/L) had recoveries ranging from 50-90% with an average of 63% recovery. At 1 ppb, recoveries ranged from 61-78% with an average of 68%. At 10 ppb, the range was from 65-68% with an average of 68%. The variation in the recoveries (%RSD) decreased from 36% to 2% as the concentration increased from 0.1 ppb to 10 ppb. The Washington Works groundwater quarterly samples collected April 11, 2001 were analyzed by both the traditional (CH2M Hill) GC/ECD method and the proposed low-level GC/MS method (Analysis # 0616).171 The data generated by the GC/MS method "Extraction o f Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater (Analysis #0813FC)," Lancaster Laboratories April 3,2001, (Bates No. EID150103-EID150113). 168 "FC-143 in Water and Wastewater by GC/MS (Analysis # 0616)," Lancaster Laboratories April 3, 2001, (Bates No. EID150114-EID1501126). 169 Sigma-Aldrich, 99% or equivalent. ITMFC-143 in Water/Wastewater by GC/MS Quad/MDL Studies (Bates No. EID149381-EID149396). 1 FC-143 Comparison Results from historic SOP and proposed SOP 1Q01, May 17, 2001, (Bates No EDD0074006). 43 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 46 of 326 PAGEID #: 40208 Tt r il l iu m , yielded concentrations 2.6 to 5.6 times higher than the traditional GC/ECD method, Table 23. The recoveries for the C-9 surrogate by the proposed low-level method, Table 24, are much higher than the traditional method. The surrogate C-9, having comparable properties to APFO, would be expected to behave in a similar manner to APFO in the analysis. Thus, the low recoveries of C-9 when using the traditional CH2M Hill method indicates that the APFO results are biased low. This can also be seen in the low matrix spike recoveries for FC-143 in the LCS, MS, and MSD of 9, 15, and 23% respectively by the CH2M Hill method.172 There was not enough sample to run MS/MSD for the proposed method so a LCS and LCSD were run on a blank spiked with FC-143. DuPont decided to continue use the CH2M Hill 10/91 method even though there is a significant difference in the results compared to the GC/MS method proposed by Lancaster Laboratories as shown in Table 23. Table 23. Comparison of the Traditional GC/ECD Low-Level Method to the Proposed Low Level GC/MS Method. Proposed Traditional Low Level Sample Sample Date GC/ECD ug/L GC/MS ug/L Gallery 4/11/2001 3.99 18.3 Ranney 4/11/2001 5.48 30.9 West Wellfield #1 4/11/2001 1.58 4.15 Table 24. Surrogate Recoveries for the Traditional GC/ECD Method to the Proposed Low-Level GC/MS Method. Traditional Proposed Low GC/ECD Level GC/MS Sample % C-9 Recovery % C-9 Recovery Gallery 18 97 Ranney 16 101 West Wellfield #1 18 80 Blank 12 110 LCS 9 96 LCSD NA 91 MS 16 ' NA MSD 19 NA QC Limits 1-50 70-130 NA = sample not included 172 Letter from R L Ritchey to WV-DEP re: Quarterly Sampling Results sampled on 4/11/01, May 25, 2001. (Bates No. EID185166-EID185171). 44 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 47 of 326 PAGEID #: 40209 2) High-Level Method \TRILLIUM, The high-level method was based on a paper by M. N. Sarrion, F. J. Santos, and M. T. Galceran, titled "In Situ Derivatization/Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Haloacetic Acids in Water."173 The high-level method "FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by SPME/GCMS (Analysis # 0615)," Revision 1, was issued April 9, 2001. 174Five milliliters of sample were placed into a vial and acidified with hydrochloric acid. The surrogate, C-9, was added. Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) used as an internal standard but was also added at this time. Tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate was added as an ion pairing reagent. Diethyl sulfate, ethanol, and sulfuric acid were then added. The solution was stirred for 30 minutes to derivatize the FC-143. After derivatization, the SPME fiber was inserted into the vial for ten minutes. The fiber was then inserted into the GC/MS and analyzed. The calibrated range was 1-25 parts per million (ppm) made from APFO prepared through the extraction/ethylation procedure. The reported MDL (from seven spikes) was 0.44 ppm when spiked at 1.0 ppm.175 The LOQ in the Scope of the method was 1.0 ppm. Based on the data from accuracy and precision studies (quad studies) submitted by Lancaster Laboratories,176'177 the average recovery of spiked FC-143 was reported to be 98% for the high-level method with a standard deviation of 1.0344 ppm. However, this was based on a spike concentration of 12.5 ppm - over twelve times higher than the reported method detection limit. The FC-143 results by the high-level method for two water samples, 23.2 and 15.8 ppm were slightly less than twice the concentration found when compared to the conventional GC/ECD method, 12.6 and 9.2 ppm respectively.178 According to Lancaster, the FC-143 used for the GC/ECD analysis was a technical grade supplied by DuPont that contained other components (APFO isomers).179 Lancaster was also using an ethylated FC-143 standard (ethyl perfluorooctanoate) for some development work (FC143 in Water and Wastewater by GC/MS (proposed low-level GC/MS Analysis # 0616)) which was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lancaster compared the results run by the proposed lowlevel GC/MS method of a 1 ug/L standard of FC-143 prepared from FC-143 obtained from Fluka and from DuPont against the calibration curve made from ethylated Sigma-Aldrich standard. The average result obtained for the Fluka 1 ppm standard was 0.80 ug/L and for the DuPont FC-143 173 M. N. Sarrion, F. J. Santos, and M. T. Galceran, In Situ Derivatization/Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Haloacetic Acids in Water, Analytical Chemistry, 72 (20), pages 4865-4873, 2000. (Bates No. EID150145-EID150173). 174 Lancaster Labs, FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by SPME/GCMS, (Analysis #0615)" Rev 1, April 9, 2001 (Bates No. EID150131-EID150147). 175 FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by GC/MS Quad/MDL Studies (Bates No. EID149381-E1D149396). 176FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by GC/MS Quad/MDL Studies (Bates No. EID149381-EID149396). 177 Email from Michael D Aucoin to Harry L Gearhart re: FC-143 exec summary, April 25, 2001, (Bates No. EID150414-EID150415) and Lancaster Labs, FC-143 Method & Evaluation: Executive Summary, May 23, 2001, (Bates No. EID149336). 178FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by GC/MS Quad/MDL Studies (Bates No. EID149381-EID149396). 179 Email from J S Kauffman (Lancaster) to Michael D Aucoin re FC-143 Standards. February 15, 2001 (Bates No. ETD150286). 45 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 48 of 326 PAGEID #: 40210 ' TTRILLIUM,,, 0.72 ug/L.180182Lancaster states the low bias in the Fluka and DuPont supplied FC-143 is due to "inherent losses during the ethylation and extraction process for the FC-143.181,182 DuPont continued sending drinking water samples to Lancaster Laboratories until October 2001 even though DuPont was aware that the CH2M Hill method that Lancaster was using had poor surrogate and FC-143 spike recoveries as reported in Lancaster's data reports. Michael D. Aucoin, a DuPont employee even talks about the problems with the recoveries in an October 3, 2000 DuPont email.183 Low surrogate and FC-143 spike recoveries indicate that the drinking water results reported by Lancaster are all biased low. K. October 2001: Exygen Research, State College, Pennsylvania Exygen Research, Inc., (Exygen) located in State College, Pennsylvania, developed a new method for the analysis of FC-143 utilizing liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS.) in the negative ion mode. Exygen first used this method on the [.PSD well samples collected October 11, 2001.1841856 The method was published on January 11, 2002.185,186 Samples were collected in plastic containers. Any residual chlorine was removed with sodium thiosulfate. A 40 mL aliquot of the sample was exposed to a Cl 8 solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge. The SPE cartridge was then eluted with 40% methanol in water, and the eluant was discarded. The cartridge was then eluted with 100% methanol, A five milliliter portion of the eluant was collected for analysis by LC/MS/MS monitoring the 413 (parent) to 369 (daughter) transition. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for this method was reported to be 0.050 ug/L. No internal standards or surrogates were used in the analysis. Calibration of the LC/MS/MS system was performed by analyzing concentrations at 0, 0.025, 0.050. 0.10, 0.25. 0.5. and 1.0 ug/L. Calibration standards were spikes of PFOA (Fluorochem USA) in water arid carriedThrough the entire analytical process. The concentration ' of the PFOA in the standard was corrected for the purity of the standard. Linear regression was used with 1/X weighting; the zero concentration was not included in the calculation. Calibration was considered acceptable if the correlation coefficient (R) was > 0.992 (R2 > 0.985). The reported limit of quantitation was 0.050 ug/L. Percent recoveries at 0.1 and 0.5 ug/L ranged from 180FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by GC/MS Quad/MDL Studies (Bates No. EID149381-EID149396). 181 FC-143 Method & Evaluation: Executive Summary, Lancaster Laboratories, May 23, 2001 (Bates No. LID 149336-LII) 149354). 182Using the ethylated Sigma-Aldrich standard in DuPont's Low-Level GC/MS method without converting the concentration to the ammonia salt (1 ppm ethyl perfluorooctanoate = 0.98 ppm APFO) will result in slightly higher numerical value (about 2% higher). ISl Email from Michael D Aucoin to Roger J Zipfel re Laboratory Proposal FC-143, October 3, 2000. (Bates No. EID545530) ... 184Analytical Report for 10/11/01 samples, Exygen Research, Inc., November 15, 2001. (Bates No. EID185019- EID185152). 185 "Method of Analysis for the Determination of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO) in Water," Exygen Research, January 11, 2002, (Bates No. EID546037-EID546063). 186 - - - REDACTED (Bates Nq EID525770-EID525801 and EID525935-EID525971). 46 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 49 of 326 PAGEID #: 40211 " ( trillium 104-112% in tap water, well water, stream water, and drinking water. A calibration check standard (second source) at 0.25 ug/L was to be analyzed with each set of samples. The response from the check standard must fall with 15% of the average response of the 0.25 ug/L calibration standards to be considered acceptable. In addition, injections of the entire set of calibration standards were to be interspersed with the samples in a set so that a second complete set of calibration standards was analyzed with each set of samples. Laboratory control samples (LCS) consisting of Milli-Q water spiked with PFOA at 0.050 and 0.50 ug/L were to be included with each set of samples. The PFOA must be from a different source than the PFOA used for the calibration standards. Recoveries must fall between 70 and 130% to be considered acceptable. Under the conditions used in the method, one peak was reported for PFOA. The 413 parent ion is due to the perfluorooctanoic acid anion while the 369 ion is due to the loss of carbon dioxide from this anion. Since the instrument is set up to monitor the 369 daughter ion from the parent 413 ion, any molecule producing a 413 ion and fragmenting further to yield a 369 ion would be detected using this analytical method. Any branched isomers of C-8 should be observed using this method if the isomers produce a 369 ion from a 413 parent ion. However, no studies were included in any of tire documents reviewed to determine the fragmentation pattern of C-8 isomers. The single peak observed in the chromatograms of field samples indicate either that no isomers are present in the samples or that all isomers elute at the same time as the straight-chain C-8. Since the analytical setup was designed to monitor just the 369 ion resulting from a parent 413 ion, any shorter or longer chain perfluoroalkyl compounds (other telomerization products) in the sample would not be detected. The concentration of PFOA was calculated from the calibration curve (linear regression parameters). The concentration of APFO was determined by multiplying the PFOA result by 431/414. Samples with responses less than the minimum detection limit (MDL) were to be reported as "ND." Samples with responses less than the LOQ and equal to or greater than the MDL were to be reported as "NQ" (not quantifiable). The LPSD samples were collected in plastic containers on October 11, 2001, and analyzed by Exygen using this method. Exygen reported duplicate results as APFO, Table 25. The relative percent difference (RPD) between the replicate samples were less than ten percent. The reported LOQ was 0.05 ug/L and the MDL was (approximately) 0.0075 ug/L. The field blank was reported as ND. Matrix spikes were run on each of the samples (0.5 ug/L PFOA spike added) and percentage recoveries reported, Table 25. Acceptable QC criteria for the MS recoveries reported by Exygen was 70-130%. 47 Case : 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15i Page: 50 olf 326 PAGEID #: 40212 TRILLIUMTM Table 25. Exygen Results for October 11, 2001 samples Duplicate APFO APFO MS Sample (ug/L) (ug/L) (% Ree.) LPSD Well A 0.703 0.684 86.0 LPSD Well B 0.581 0.568 84.2 LPSD Well F 0.288 0.264 87.6 LPSD Bid Main QC Limits 0.621 0.605 96.6 70-130 The chromatograms included with the Exygen report monitor the 369 daughter ion and generally display a single, symmetrical peak just after five minutes. Background noise was observable in the blanks and methanol washes. The chromatogram for the 0.05 ug/L standard provided a strong signal at an amplitude an order of magnitude above that used for the blanks and washes. Any noise in the 0.05 ug/L standard chromatogram was lost in the baseline. In subsequent laboratory reports, Exygen reported the results below the limit of detection (LOD) as "ND."187 Results between the LOD and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were reported as not quantifiable "NQ." Results above the LOQ are reported as APFO with a numerical value in units of ug/L. Exygen's APFO results from the LPSD and Little Hocking Water Association production wells are shown in Tables 26 and 27.188 The reported LOD and LOQ for the March 28, 2002 LPSD samples were 0.010 and 0.050 ug/L respectively.189 Exygen's report for the March 28, 2002 samples states that all samples were analyzed in duplicate. Exygen reported the average of the duplicate results if both results were greater than five times the LOQ and the RPD was less than 20%. If the RPD was greater than 20%, the higher value was reported.190 If both results were less than the five times the LOQ (and above the LOQ), the average was reported if the difference between the two results was less than 50 ug/L. Otherwise the higher value was reported. The MDL is comparable to the LOD. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, Data Assessment DuPont Washington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program), October 2 2008 (Bates No. ROWE039818-ROWE039969B). ' 188 Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: Public Water Supply Resilts, West Viriginia, and Ohio, July 31 2002. (Bates No. OEPA2766-OEPA2770). '' Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: Lubeck, Belpre, and Tuppers Public Service District Sampling Results sampled in March 2002, April 16, 2002 (Bates No. EID598321-EID598343). The reported MDL was approximately 0.01 ug/L. 190 Ibid. 48 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 51 of 326 PAGEID #: 40213 Table 26. Exygen's Results 'or LPSD Production Wells 1/3/02 2/21/02 Sample LPSD Well A APFO (ug/L) 0.764 APFO (ug/L) 0.683 LPSD Well B NA 0.61 LPSD Well C 0.592 0.479 LPSD Well D 0.758 0.725 LPSD Well E LPSD Well F 0.332 1.04 1 0.313 LPSD After Treatment NA NA NA = not available ' Tt r il l iu m inc 3/28/02 APFO (ug/L) 0.796 0.551 0.491 0.692 1.09 0.358 & 0.352 0.69 4/26/02 APFO (ug/L) 0.938 0.532 0.471 0.406 1.11 0.332 0.652 Table 27. Exygen's Results for Little docking Production Wells 12/20/01 1/21/02 2/22/02 APFO APFO APFO Sample (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) Little Hocking 1 1.82 1.72 2.37 Little Hocking 2 3.72 & 3.52 2.97 2.03 & 2.07 Little Hocking 3 0.844 0.744 0.42 Little Hocking 5 7.66 6.22 6.14 3/26/02 APFO (ug/L) 2.99 3.31 0.827 5.69 4/23/02 APFO (ug/L) 2.02 3.4 0.783 6.57 The LC/MS/MS method used by Exygen depends on the electrospray ionization of PFOA to be consistent between the standards and the samples. In the Exygen method the straight-chain PFOA and the branched-chain isomers elute as one peak. According to Jonathan W. Martin et al. in a 2004 paper co-authored by Mary Kaiser of DuPont, "Isomers respond to electrospray ionization (ESI) differently, and thus the relative areas in the chromatogram do not necessarily reflect the relative amounts in the standard."'91 Thus, the isomers content in the standards should match isomer ratio of the samples. Martin et al. also state that "coeluting matrix components can either suppress or enhance ionization, which must be controlled to achieve maximum accuracy." Procedures to control the matrix effects can include matching the standard matrix to the samples, the method of standard additions, and isotope dilution. Martin et al. write: "Standard addition quantitation, which involves spiking successive known quantities of a standard into the sample and reanalyzing, is common in atomic absorption spectroscopy and an acceptable technique to use when matrix effects are unavoidable." However, Martin et al. also state, "Isotopically labeled perfluoroalkyl internal standards (isotope dilution) are probably the most appropriate approach for negating ionization effects because they will have the same retention times as their natural analogues (excluding any isomeric separation)." Exygen did not use any of these procedures for the water samples collected from the community drinking water systems. Therefore, it raises questions about the accuracy of Exygen's water analysis for PFOA.* Jonathan W. Martin et al., Analytical Challenges Hamper Perfluoroalkyl Research, Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 38 (13), pp. 248A-255A. 49 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 52 of 326 PAGEID #: 40214 \TRILLIUM,,C In a 2007 paper published by Barbara S. Larsen and Mary A. Kaiser, DuPont's Corporate Center for Analytical Science, they wrote:192193 Because perfluorinated compounds are so different from their hydrocarbon analogs, additional care must be taken to ensure that a valid method is demonstrated. Adequate methods include "the usual" good precision and accuracy as well as spike recovery, linearity, internal standards, surrogates, and a variety o f blanks"for the analysis ofPFOA. Larsen and Kaiser also wrote: One major consideration is the effect o f coeluting peaks on the analyte signal. Coeluting peaks can affect the ionization efficiency o f the PFC [perofluorocarboxylate] either positively or negatively, giving either an apparently higher or lower concentration result, depending on the nature and concentration o f the coeluant. An isotopically enriched internal standard added before the LC analysis will have the same retention time as the analyte, so the signal o f the isotopically enriched standard can be monitored to determine whether the analyte signal is suppressed or enhanced (33). I f a second isotopically enriched standard is available, it can be added early in the sampling or sample preparation process as a surrogate to elucidate any problems caused by these procedures. Larsen and Kaiser also state, "If available, the best surrogate is an isotopically enriched version of the analyte." DuPont chose Exygen in October 2001 to perform the LC/MS/MS analysis on drinking water from the community instead of Lancaster Laboratories even though Exygen did not use internal standards or surrogates to monitor if the method was performing properly. Exygen was one of the laboratories involved in the analysis of human blood for PFOA in 2005 and 2006 as part of The C-8 Health Project. As part of the quality-assurance measures for the medical monitoring of the participants in the study, a second laboratory Axys of Vancover, Canada analyzed split samples of blood (that of participants and spiked rabbit serum standards). The results for the split samples analyzed by Axys were consistently lower than the results from Exygen. In fact, Axys analyzed samples obtained from participants up to December 7, 2005 were 30% lower than the split samples from Exygen. This trend did not continue after December 8, 2005. In order to determine if the difference was real, selected splits were retested by both laboratories after December 7, 2005. After December 2005 Exygen's retest results were lower than Exygen's original results and Exygen's retest results were closer to the Axys' results (i.e., 25 % different before December and -2% after December). There was no information if this laboratory discrepancy was investigated. Something apparently changed at Exygen to cause the abrupt change in the results. This change most likely has to do with calibration and the standards used for calibration. It is not known if this anomaly in the blood data also affected the results for 192Barbara S. Larsen and Mary A. Kaiser, Challenges in Perfluorocarboxylic Acid Measurements, Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 79 (11), pp. 3966-3973. 193 Kevin M. Leyden and Alan Ducatman, West Virginia University, "Chronicle of the C8 Health Project". 50 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 53 of 326 PAGEID #: 40215 -- Ttr illiu m , the above water samples. Therefore, it raises questions about the accuracy of Exygen's water results. Exygen's method is not the first LC/MS/MS method for PFOA. REDACTED 1997, .. REDACTED By 94 The US EPA published a LC/MS/MS method for PFOA in drinking water, Method 537, in September 2009.195 In contrast to the Exygen method, the US EPA method used isotopically labeled compounds for internal standards and surrogates including perfluoro-[l,2-l3C2]octanoic acid. The US EPA Method uses a range between 70-130% as the QC criteria for recovery of PFOA spikes in laboratory fortified blanks, MS/MSD, and for surrogate recoveries. L. Summary of Methods Used by DuPont and Its Contract Laboratories for Drinking Water Analysis In 1984 DuPont was aware that APFO was present in the drinking water system served by the LPSD and in Little Hocking Water Association by virtue of its own sampling and analysis. These samples were analyzed by GC/ECD by DuPont's own laboratory at the Experimental Station, Wilmington, Delaware. Although DuPont questions the analytical accuracy of their results prior to January 1991, the detection of this substance in the community drinking water occurred on more than one occasion between 1984 and 1991. These results are probably biased low because DuPont only measured the main straight-chain isomer. However, because of the lack of quality assurance/quality control with the Experimental Station results such as surrogates and matrix spiking, the accuracy and precision of this data are not known. From September 1991 through November 1998 DuPont used CH2M Hill to analyze the drinking water samples by GC/ECD. CH2M Hill's method included internal standards, surrogates, and matrix spikes. CH2M Hill only measured the main straight-chain isomer of PFOA. DuPont intentionally chose CH2M Hill to analyze the drinking water samples for a period of seven years even though DuPont knew that CH2M Hill's results were significantly lower than the Experimental Station's results for split samples and "CH2M Hill experienced poor surrogate recovery."196 DuPont was aware that CH2M Hill's "numbers may be low on the absolute basis."197 DuPont did not voluntarily stop using CH2M Hill for C-8 water analysis but only switched laboratories after CH2M Hill's laboratory went out of business in the Fall of 1998. 194 EID213799-EID212872). REDACTED (Bates No. 1 5 EPA/600/R-08/092 Method 537, Determination of Selected Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids in Drinking Water by Solid Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), in September 2009. 6Memorandum from Terry Vandell to Walt Stewart, Meeting Minutes of the On-Site Washington Works Meeting (September 11, 1991, 9:00 AM-11:00 AM) Regarding the September 4, 1991 Proposed C-8 Sampling Program, September 19, 1991. (Bates No. EID909790-E1D909809) ' 197 Ibid. 51 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 54 of 326 PAGEID #: 40216 \ TRILLIUM,, At DuPont's direction, Lancaster Laboratories used the CH2M Hill method with some minor changes to analyze drinking water samples submitted by DuPont from February 1999 through October 2001. Lancaster experienced poor surrogate recoveries and poor recoveries of FC-143 spiked into samples and blanks. DuPont was aware of the poor recoveries198 and continued having Lancaster analyze the samples using the CH2M Hill method even though DuPont knew the results were biased low. Lancaster proposed an improved method using GC/MS with good surrogate recoveries and good FC-143 spike recoveries. Preliminary results from Lancaster's proposed method yielded higher results than the traditional CH2M Hill method but DuPont never authorized use of this improved method on any of the drinking water samples from LPSD or Little Hocking. Instead DuPont intentionally chose Exygen's LC/MS/MS method drat DuPont knew did not include surrogates to monitor if the method was performing properly. A summary of PFOA methods used by DuPont and its contract laboratories between 1984 to 2004 is shown in Table 28. 198 Email from Michael D. Aucoin to Roger J. Zipfel re Laboratory Proposal FC-143, October 3 2000 (Bates No EID545530) 52 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 55 of 326 PAGEID #: 40217 ' trilliuivl Table 28. Summary of PFOA Methods Used by DuPont and It's Contract Laboratories for PFOA in Drinking Water 1984 to 2004 Dates Used Laboratory Method Sample Preparation Sample Size (mL) Internal Standard Surrogate Comments 1984 to 1991 DuPont Experiment Station GC/ECD Freeze dry, derivatize with methanoic HCl 10 C-10 None Reported as F and multiplied by 1.5 to obtain perfluorooctanoate. Reported main PFOA peak. September 1991 to November 1998 CH2M Hill February 1999 to Lancaster -October 2001 Laboratories October 2001 to Exygen Research, 2004+ Inc. GC/ECD Extraction with organic solvent, cleanup, derivatize with ethanoic HCl GC/ECD Extraction with organic solvent, cleanup, derivatize with ethanoic HCl LC/MS/MS C18 SPE cartridge 1000 1000 40 C-7 1,2Dichlorobenzene 1,2,4Trichlorobenzene C-7 (ethyl ester) 1,2- Dichlorobenzene 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene None C-9, C-10, & C-11 Low surrogate & MS/MSD recoveries. Reported main PFOA peak C-9, C-11, & C-12 Low surrogate, LCS, MS/MSD recoveries. Added main APFO peak and 3 isomers. None One Peak. Calculated result as APFO. Replicates and MS. No surrogates 53 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 56 of 326 PAGEID #: 40218 \ TRILLIUM,,,^ VII. OVERVIEW In the early 1980s DuPont was measuring the concentration of PFOA in blood from its Washington Works plant in West Virginia employees and their newborn children.199 This type of sampling and analysis is not undertaken unless it is extremely important and very serious. The concern about these results require the best sampling and analysis planning to obtain reliable PFOA measurements for all of the various media that define the PFOA exposure to humans and the environment. This includes the PFOA sources, transport, and fate. At this same time, DuPont was steadily increasing the amount of APFO used at the Washington Works plant in the production of its fluoropolymers. With the increase in APFO usage, DuPont knew that APFO releases into the environment surrounding the plant were also increasing. This includes APFO releases into the atmosphere, releases to the Ohio River, and disposal in landfills. Experimental data come from a measurement process. The data obtained consist of numbers that are used to provide a basis for a decision. Experimental factors influence the results. Variability is inevitable in a measurement process. A good measurement process results from an effort to control the sources of variability. By effort, the process can be improved and, conversely, lack of attention can lead to inaccurate and imprecise results. Reliable data production requires planning. The first step is to define the problem to be investigated by the measurement. A sampling and analysis plan needs to be adopted. The samples and the analytical method must accomplish what is required of the measurement process. Data quality objectives are an integral portion of the planning process. The quality of the results depend on the analytical method, sampling process, and the quality assurance adopted from the data quality objectives. In the case of PFOA in blood, the seriousness of the investigation requires the most stringent data quality objectives possible. Excluding blatant mistakes in the production of measurement data, there are two sources of error: random error and systematic error. Random error is the uncertainty or variability in the process of making a measurement. If there are enough samples analyzed this random error statistic will average out to zero. The error in any given measurement can be of a different magnitude and sign (plus or minus) from the true value. Systematic error always has the same sign (always plus or always minus) and the magnitude. This error is persistent for a given methodology. When a systematic error is suspected or indicated, then there must be an effort made to eliminate the error. This is the fundamental precept in analytical chemistry and especially true if there are serious consequences for the decision process using the data generated by the measurement. From the mid-1980s, the USEPA was formulating their data quality objectives.200 The analytical chemistry both qualitative and quantitative would be governed by the criteria placed on the data use or level of concern. EPA suggests that the end use of the quality of the data developed by the measurement should be indicated by the following five parameters: 122 EID079375. 200November 5, 1985, USEPA Draft Data Quality Objectives for RI/FS Process. 54 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 57 of 326 PAGEID #: 40219 ITRILLIUMTM precision accuracy representativeness completeness comparability The acronym for these parameters is PARCC. They come from the general knowledge basic to analytical chemistry. a) Precision Precision is the quantitative evaluation of the reproducibility of a measurement. There is analytical precision measured by running a sample by the method two or more times. There is sampling and analytical precision by obtaining two or more samples from the same location at the same time and running the analytical method on these samples. Analytical precision plus sampling precision equals the precision of the entire variability of the measurement. Thus, it is not how close you come to the bullseye, but how well you group your shots. b) Accuracy Accuracy is the quantitative assessment of how close the result is to the true or actual value. Since the true value is not known, the accuracy is judged by the lack of interferences and the ability to calibrate the analytical methodology with the target analyte. There are numerous quality control (QC) samples and techniques used to measure a bias in the analytical result. Two techniques are used to reduce the bias in an analytical methodology's results: isotope dilution and method of standard additions. Thus, accuracy is the measurement of how close your shot or shots come to the bullseye. c) Representativeness Representativeness is the measure of how close the analytical result comes to the actual result for the sample media. In other words, a good or useable measurement can not come from a bad sample. Gain or loss of the analyte during the sampling, transport, and storage of the sample will affect the analytical accuracy and/or precision, thus the answer will not represent the sampled media for the analyte of interest.*20 See USEPA SW-846, Method 8290, Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs)by High-Resolution Gas Chromatography/High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry(HRGC/HRMS), September 1994. 202 See USEPA SW-846, Chapter One Quality Control, July 1991. 55 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 58 of 326 PAGEID #: 40220 \ TRILLIUMIHC. d) Completeness Completeness is defined as the goal in obtaining the critical valid data for the intended use of the measurement. If the data are not accurate and/or precise enough for the intended use, then the sample must be re-sampled and/or reanalyzed to obtain a valid result. e) Comparability Comparability is the confidence the user has in the comparability of one result to another. This can be results obtained by a single analytical method, a single analytical method by another chemist and/or laboratory, or by two different methods. The best result would be a measurement with accuracy and precision, which is the same for different analytical methods, chemists, and laboratories. Using PARCC as a guide and the importance of the analytical methodology to achieve the accurate concentration of PFOA in drinking water, there are several facts that need to be addressed. The Chronology of DuPont's C-8 Water Analysis 1982 - 1991 The S. S. Stafford method was used by the DuPont Experimental Station for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of PFOA in water. The PFOA was concentrated as a salt by freeze drying and derivatized to a methyl ester prior to capillary column gas chromatography analysis utilizing an electron capture detector. (GC/ECD). The PFOA was quantified using an internal standard. Systematic errors that either did occur or might have occurred are: Accounting for the isomers of perfluorooctanoate. Accounting for the reporting difference between PFOA and APFO. Purity of the PFOA in the calibration. Purity of the internal standard perfluorodecanoate. Percent methylation of PFOA and PFDA (internal standard). Drinking water samples analyzed for PFOA in 1984 had a detection of 0.6 ug/L (ppb) for a 10 mL sample size. Quality control measurements were not given with this methodology. Even though the reported results for PFOA in drinking water was greater than 1 ppb, there was no 56 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 59 of 326 PAGEID #: 40221 TRILLIUMTM, sampling and analysis planned or initiated at the Washington Works to develop reliable data for PFOA in drinking water starting with sampling and analysis to obtain accuracy, precision, and representativeness of the results. After a decade of PFOA measurements in water by DuPont, and after the establishment of an 1 ppb drinking water standard, DuPont attempted to discredit its own, earlier results by stating: "All results less than or equal to 10 ppb prior to 1991 are suspect because of analytical technique accuracy."203 Yet, there was no effort to determine the error in the PFOA measurements in water, if there indeed was one. The analytical method accuracy could have been easily fortified with available changes in the methodology well known to DuPont's analytical chemists. These are: Isotope dilution methodology using either 14C or 13C PFOA. The method of standard additions (MSA). Determining the appropriate adjustments in order to report tire concentrations of linear PFOA and the branched isomers of PFOA. Isotope Dilution Methods The stable isotope carbon-13 can be used to "tag" PFOA with carbon-13 atoms that will change the molecular weight from 414 daltons to 422 daltons.204 This isotopically labeled linear PFOA thus serves as a tracer for the linear PFOA in the analytical method. Any concentration changes in the analytical protocol will affect both the regular PFOA and the isotopically labeled PFOA alike because their chemistry is identical. The isotopically labeled PFOA is the internal standard for PFOA in the sample. Therefore, if the concentration of both types of PFOA are similar, then adsorption to glass or plastic, losses due to sample manipulation, etc. are automatically adjusted since the changes occur to both the isotopically labeled linear PFPA and the linear sample PFOA. This analytical methodology has been used for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin at parts per billion levels since the mid-1980s205 by the US EPA. Also a general method using isotope dilution GC/MS was published by the US EPA in the Federal Register in 1984 as a method to quantitatively analyze semi-volatile organic compounds in water. This was called Method 1625 and had target analytes that were the same as in Method 8270 of SW-846. As these methods were all publically available, DuPont had access to this information. The main advantage of the isotopic dilution methodology is its ability to give accurate measurements at very low concentrations in difficult matrices. The method works equally well for the tandem mass spectrometry methodologies such as GC/MS/MS206 or LC/MS/MS. This C-8 Sample Summary: 11/90 to Present (Updated 9/13/91). (Bates No. EID109509-EID109511). 204 Perfluoro-n-[,3C8]octanoic acid. This compound was introduced in 2008 by Wellington Laboratories LLC. Other ''C labeled compounds such as perfluoro-n-[l,2,3,4-bC4]octanoic acid was available in 2005. Personal communication. 205 December 14, 1984. 206 J. S. Smith, D. Ben-Hur, R. Pavlick, M. Urban, J. LaFornara, R. D. Kleopfer, K. T. Yue, C. J. Kirchmer, W. A. 57 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 60 of 326 PAGEID #: 40222 - Ttr illiu m , analytical methodology addresses systematic errors and improves the accuracy and precision of the results. The isotope dilution method was proposed for PFOA analysis of drinking water by Dr. Larsen of DuPont in 2007 in a feature article in the Journal o fAnalytical Chemistry 201 Isotopically labeled PFOA was first used by DuPont in the early 1980s in a report published in 1982 titled "Placental Transfer of 14C-labelled C-8 in the Rat, Haskell Laboratory Report' No. 61-82."*208 Thus, DuPont could have developed an isotope dilution method with carbon-14 in the early 1980's when the Experimental Station started to analyzed PFOA in water. While carbon-14 is the radioactive isotope of carbon and carbon-13 is the stable isotope of carbon, tire synthesis of the labeled PFOA would be the same. Thus, DuPont could have developed an isotope dilution method using isotopically labeled PFOA in the early 1980's but chose not to. Method of Standard Additions The method of standard additions is very useful for quantitative analysis of low concentrations of an analyte. A calibration curve is generated using varying amounts of the analyte placed into the sample using the sample itself as a blank for the calibration curve. The detector response should be linear with a slope similar to a calibration curve without the sample but with a pure matrix substance. The sample concentration can be determined from the graphical representation of the calibration curve generated with the sample matrix.209*According to an article on the analysis of PFOA published in 2004 in the Journal o f Environmental Science and Technology and co-authored by Mary Kaiser of DuPont, the method of standard additions is an "acceptable technique to use when matrix effects are unavoidable."" Isomer Content of PFOA The isomer content of the 3M PFOA is mostly the straight chain isomer with several branched chain compounds. The telomer manufactured by DuPont is the straight chain isomer of PFOA. The difficulty in the comparability of analytical methods is the nature of the calibration standard and whether the analytical methodology can and does differentiate between the isomers in the FC-143 produced by 3M. The analytical methodology will be affected by the calibration standard and the moiety reaching the detector. Are all of the isomers equally detected by the mass spectrometer or electron capture detector? Are all the isomers derivatized by the techniques used in the method? Smith and S. Viswanathan, "Comparison o f a New Rapid Extraction GC/MS/MS and the Contract Laboratory Program GC/MS/MS Methodologiesfo r the Analysis o f 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, " 189th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Miami Beach, Florida, April 28-May 3, 1985. 07 Barbara S. Larsen and Mary A. Kaiser, Challenges in Perfluorocarboxylic Acid Measurements, Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 79 (11), pp. 3966-3973. 208 Affidavit of David Gray, Ph.D., December 13, 2004 [Bates No. USEPA19401-USEPA19423]). 209 Presentation on mercury analysis at the parts per trillion level by MSA and US EPA SW-846. 1 Jonathan W. Martin et al., Analytical Challenges Hamper Perfluoroalkyl Research, Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 38 (13), pp. 248A-255A. 58 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 61 of 326 PAGEID #: 40223 rRILLIUM, Some GC chromatograms separate some of the isomers whereas others do not. How does this affect the resulting PFOA concentration? Concentration Adjustment Factors There have been several calculated C-8 concentrations from the analytical results. C-8 from a GC/ECD method calculated as fluoride and then recalculated as perfluorooctanoate by multiplying the fluoride results by 1.5. The PFOA isomers that were observed in some of the GC/ECD analysis were sometimes included in the quantitation and sometimes only the straight chain isomer of PFOA was included. Multiplying C-8 results by a factor of 1.4 to account for the isomers of C-8 that were not reported with the main C-8 peak. Inconsistency in the form of the compound that was reported to represent C-8 and FC-143. C-8 and FC-143 were reported to represent either perfluorooctanoate, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), or ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO). Corrections made for surrogate recoveries to the PFOA concentrations. DuPont's statement that their results were corrected for surrogate recovery.211 1991-2001 The year 1991 brought changes to the analysis program of the DuPont Washington Works plant and the surrounding vicinity. By June 11, 1991 DuPont had formally approved a Community Exposure Guideline (CEG) for ammonium perfluorooctanoate (APFO) at 1 ug/L (ppb). Therefore, it would be advantageous to have an analytical method for APFO that has a detection limit close to 0.1 ug/L. This would provide for random error levels at or near the 1 ug/L level to be numerated. Also in June of 1991, PFOA was found in the new LPSD well water above 1 ppb. It was not until this point in time that DuPont suddenly looked to an outside lab to start handling any of its C-8 water analysis. In September of 1991, DuPont asked a new outside laboratory, CH2M Hill of Montgomery, Alabama to analyze water samples obtained from the Ohio River and the new Lubeck Public Service District wells. The comparison of the results with samples analyzed by DuPont's Experimental Station using DuPont's C-8 method revealed a systematic error because the Experimental Station's results were approximately twice the results reported by CH2M Hill's analysis (see Table 12). This systematic error was verified by statistical methods using the 211 Memorandum, from R. J Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 InterLaboratory Meeting, November 18, 1991 (Bates No. E ID 2 5 6 133-E ID 2 5 6 162). 59 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 62 of 326 PAGEID #: 40224 ^ T ,t r il l iu mI INC. Student t Distribution test212 for the differences between paired values from the two laboratories. If the calculated t value is greater than the confidence limit values in Student t Distribution tables then there is a high probability of a systematic error. The calculated t value213 for this set of data is greater than the t value for both the 95% and 99% probability indicating that there is a strong probability of at least one systematic error, Table 29. This initial review comparison was also tested in October of 1991. Four split samples of water were sent to both laboratories with each sample having a blind duplicate. The reported answers to these four water samples are given in Table 13. The Student t test was applied to the differences between the two laboratory's results that were in the drinking water range 214 The calculated t value for this set of data is greater than the t value for 95% confidence indicating that there is a strong probability of at least one systematic error, Table 30. Table 29. Calculation of the Student t Distribution for the September 1991 Paired Result Differences between the Experimental Station and C H2M Hill. Experimental Station CH2M Hill Sample Location C-8 (ppb) C-8 (ppb) Difference Test Well #27 7.1 1.2 5.9 Well MW-4 2.7 0.2 2.5 Ohio River -3 (near outfall) 19.6 11 8.6 Ohio River -3 (duplicate) 16.8 12 4.8 Ohio River -5 4.2 1.1 3.1 Ohio River -5(duplicate) 2.8 1.1 1.7 Ohio River -6 (duplicate) 2 0.6 1.4 Old LPSD Well - 1 (duplicate) 4.1 1.1 3.0 Old LPSD Well - 4 4.2 0.9 3.3 Old LPSD Well - 4 (duplicate) 2.9 1.7 1.2 Average = 3.6 Standard Dev = 2.3 Calculated t = 4.9* *For 9 degrees of freedom, to.975 =: 2.26 (95 % probability) and to.995= 3.25 (99 % probability) from Student t Distribution tables. 2,2 John A. Dean, "Analytical Chemistry Handbook," 1995, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Section 20.4.1 Student's Distribution or t Test. 1 " s td W v N where Diff = average difference, Std Div = standard deviation of the differences, and N = number of pairs of data. The t test was applied to the group values less than 10 ppb which were within the range of the drinking water results. 60 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 63 of 326 PAGEID #: 40225 ' ( trillium ,, Table 30. Calculation of the Student t Distribution for the October 1991 Paired Result Differences between the Experimental Station anc CH2M Hill Experimental Station CH2M Hill Sample Location C-8 (ppb) C-8 (ppb) Difference Test Well #27 4.7 2.5 2.2 Test Well #27 (duplicate) 4.3 3.2 1.1 TW-M4 1.3 0.7 0.6 TW-M4 (duplicate) 1.7 0.6 1.1 TW-331 1.0 0.6 0.4 TW-331 (duplicate) 1.4 0.6 0.8 Average = 1.03 Standard Dev = 0.63 Calculated t = 4.0* *For 5 degrees of freedom, to.975 = 2.57 (95 % probability) and to.995= 4.03 (99 % probability) from Student t Distribution tables. The CH2M Hill laboratory's method included a concentration step of solvent extraction of 1000 mL of water sample followed by malting the PFOA ethyl ester and GC/ECD. CH2M Hill's MDL was 0.1 ug/L (ppb). They used surrogates in order to determine the efficiency of the analytical method to be quantitative. These surrogate compounds were perfluoroalkyl acids like PFOA and were added to the sample prior to extraction. The surrogate recoveries for the October 1991 analysis by CH2M Hill are shown in Table 14. If the PFOA results are corrected for the surrogate C-9 recoveries, the Student t test indicates there is still a systematic error (95% probability) and the systematic error in the CH2M Hill PFOA analysis gives low values, Table 31. In spite of the acknowledgement of the low results for PFOA, DuPont purposely chose to contract CH2M Hill in November of 1991 to analyze water samples going forward and did not require surrogate correction when reporting results.215 215 Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 Interlaboratory Meeting, November 18. 1991, (Bates No. EID256133EID256162). 61 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 64 of 326 PAGEID #: 40226 ^ \TRILLIUM,NC Table 31. Calculation of the Student t Distribution for the October 1991 Paired Result Differences between the Experimental Station and CH2M Hill After Correcting the CH2M Hill Results for the C-9 Surrogate Recovery.______________________ ______________ __________ CH2M Hill Experimental Surrogate Ree Station Corrected Sample Location C-8 (ppb) C-8 (ppb) Difference Test Well #27 4.7 4.0 0.7 Test Well #27 (duplicate) 4.3 4.3 0.0 TW-M4 1.3 0.8 0.5 TW-M4 (duplicate) 1.7 0.8 0.9 TW-331 1.0 0.8 0.2 TW-331 (duplicate) 1.4 0.7 0.7 Average = 0.5 Standard Dev = 0.33 Calculated t= 3.8* *For 5 degrees of freedom, to.975 = 2.57 (95 % probability) and to.995= 4.03 (99 % probability) from Student t Distribution tables. If the objective is to produce reliable, useful, and accurate measurements of PFOA, then it would be imperative to eliminate systematic errors and reduce the measurement scatter at the concentration levels approaching the MDL. Yet on June 8, 1993 the CH2M Hill Laboratory sent water sample results to DuPont's Washington Works concerning the water samples that were run twice. The Student t test for significance between the first analysis and the re-analysis indicates a systematic error at the 90% confidence level. In addition, there is no explanation of the cause for the improvement in the C-9 surrogate recovery due to the smaller sample volume extraction. Both of these facts revealed to DuPont that the CH2M Hill PFOA results are lower than the actual amount in the sample. Thus, there is a negative bias. DuPont's Verification Investigation Washington Works April 1992 report to the US EPA states on Page 27 that there are PFOA groundwater data that are highly variable but were better when there was re-sampling due to improved surrogate recoveries. Thus, DuPont was well aware of this analytical problem with the PFOA measurement in a water matrix. Region III of the US EPA Item 5 of their comments on the VI also believe this problem should be addressed and explained. Despite knowledge of the surrogate recovery problem of the CH2M Hill method, DuPont never switched away from that laboratory for its water analysis, even though it knew that it would be submitting that laboratory's results to the Federal government as part of its RCRA Facility Investigation of the DuPont Washington Works. DuPont was forced to make a change, however, when the CH2M Hill laboratory in Montgomery, Alabama ceased operations in the fall of 1998. At that point, DuPont contracted with Lancaster Laboratories of Pennsylvania to analyze PFOA in water and asked Lancaster to use the same method CH2M Hill had been using. DuPont's RCRA report dated June 30, 1999 states that DuPont provided the analytical SOP to Lancaster 62 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 65 of 326 PAGEID #: 40227 " \TR IL L IU M ,,c Laboratories.216 The RCRA report also notes that the Lancaster PFOA results were higher than the CH2M Hill results for the previous round of analysis of groundwater noting that both laboratories "gave poor or imprecise spike recoveries."217 The data validation process of the groundwater results were judged to be "unusable (flagged R) primarily due to very low spike recoveries associated with the non-detect FC-143 results."218219 Nevertheless, DuPont asked Lancaster Laboratories to continue to analyze PFOA in water samples using the CH2M Hill method. During the time frame from the Fall of 1998 until the Fall of 2001, Lancaster Laboratories made several attempts to improve the accuracy of the PFOA methodology by numerous analytical techniques including changing solvents, clean-ups, concentration methods, and instrumentation. By April of 2001, Lancaster had told DuPont about a new GC/MS method that had better surrogate recoveries but would yield C-8 levels 2.6 to 5.6 times higher than the CH2M Hill method. In response, none of the Lancaster Laboratories PFOA method improvements were accepted by DuPont. 2001 - Present In October 2001 rather than use the improved methods recommended by Lancaster, DuPont decided to start using a completely different laboratory, MPI (Now Exygen Research, Inc.) of State College, Pennsylvania to analyze PFOA in water samples, claiming that Exygen Research was using the "state of the art" SPE/LC/MS/MS methodology to measure the concentration of PFOA in water samples. The sample concentration step is solid phase extraction (SPE) followed by elution of PFOA that was separated by liquid chromatography (LC) and qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by negative ion mass spectrometry, a collision cell and mass spectrometry of a fragment ion. Electrospray sample introduction was used between the liquid chromatograph and the tandem mass spectrometer. The method limit of quantitation was 0.05 ug/L (ppb). Yet this was not a new method, REDACTED had been utilizing LC/MS/MS on water samples since 1991. The Exygen Research method did not include a surrogate. The Severn Trent Laboratory (STL) in Denver, Colorado was designing a LC/MS/MS method for PFOA in water for DuPont in 2001 as well as Exygen Research. However, the Severn Trent Laboratory was including PFNA (C-9) as a surrogate. Rather than yield C-8 water results 2.6 to 5.6 times higher than CH2M Hill had been reporting, as would have been the case if the improved Lancaster Laboratories method were used, the new Exygen method yielded C-8 results much more similar to CH2M Hill's. The ability to verify the accuracy of Exygen's new results was hindered, however, as there was were no longer any surrogate recovery rates that would have revealed such problems. PFNA is an excellent surrogate for the LC/MS/MS analysis if it is of known purity. Dr. Larsen brings the purity issue into question in her 2007 feature article in Analytical Chemistry. 216 RCRA Facility Investigation Report DuPont Washington Works Washington, West Virginia, USEPA Permit Number WVD04-587-5291, DuPont Remediation Group, June 30, 1999, (Bates No, EID109642-EID109786). 217 Ibid. Section 4.1.2.1 FC-143 Analysis. 2,8 Ibid. Section 4.1.3 RFI Data Usability Review and Data Validation. 219 Barbara S. Larsen and Mary A. Kaiser, Challenges in Perfluorocarboxylic Acid Measurements, Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 79 (11), pp. 3966-3973. 63 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 66 of 326 PAGEID #: 40228 \T R IL L IU M STL performed a study of the stability of PFOA at concentrations of 0.1 to 50 ug/L in water in glass and plastic containers. There was no noticeable decline in PFOA after over two months of storage in either glass or plastic containers. They remained stable. The LC/MS/MS method does not separate the isomers of PFOA. In addition, MS/MS is not consistent for each isomer of PFOA, as shown by Dr. Larsen.220 This strongly implies that the 2001 methodology of SPE LC/MS/MS is not measuring PFOA accurately and precisely due to the unknown factors that have not been resolved. The Data Assessment DuPont Washington Works Report dated October 2, 2008 does not include any public drinking water data prior to the 2001 LC/MS/MS method. The previous water PFOA analytical data is ignored without a reason implied or given. Measurement data cannot be dismissed without giving a logical reason for its dismissal. The data cannot be "cherry picked" due to its advantage to the picker. Data validation of the LC/MS/MS measurements was done on two groundwater data packages by Environmental Standards, Inc. of Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. These samples were taken in 2005 and 2006 and consisted of about 36 samples. No residential nor public water samples were included. The data assessment process was not comprehensive. Poor Surrogate Recoveries CH2M Hill's laboratory analyzed water samples for PFOA by GC/ECD. In late 1991 DuPont gave the analytical analysis of PFOA to the CH2M Hill laboratory in spite of their known lower results on split samples with the DuPont Experimental Station. The CH2M Hill surrogate recoveries were low ranging from 34 to 87%, strongly implying that the results were less than the actual concentration in the samples (see Tables 12 and 13), belying DuPont's representation in November of 1991, that CH2M Hill laboratory was complying with the US EPA data quality protocols. It is interesting to note that there was no third party data validation of this PFOA data even though the US EPA "Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analysis" was published on February 1, 1988. This flawed CH2M Hill analytical method remained in use until October, 2001. Lancaster Laboratories proposed to DuPont a modification of US EPA Method 552.5 for haloacetic acids in drinking water to analyze PFOA in water samples. They reported spike recoveries that averaged 94% and greatly improved surrogate recoveries. Water samples from the Washington Works production wells were analyzed by both the CH2M Hill method and the proposed method. DuPont knew that the Lancaster method showed consistently higher results by a factor of 2.6 to 5.6 (see Table 19) and surrogate recoveries between 80 and 110% (see Table 20). Yet DuPont purposely chose not to use this apparently improved method and more accurate methodology which included mass spectrometry confirmation for use in the analysis of water 220 Ibid. 221 Data Assessment DuPont Washington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program), DuPont Corporate Remediation Group, October 2, 2008, (Bates No. ROWE039818-ROWE039969B). 64 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 67 of 326 PAGEID #: 40229 \TRILLIUMinc samples by DuPont. No Surrogate Method After learning of the improved Lancaster method that improved recoveries but yielded much higher drinking water results, DuPont contracted with a new laboratory Exygen Research, Inc. of State College, Pennsylvania to develop a LC/MS/MS method to analyze PFOA in water which need not include any surrogate spikes. This is a critical factor when there is a non-detect for the analysis of analyte PFOA. The question becomes whether or not the entire analytical system functions as per the methodology. For instance, if the injection of the sample into the LC or the desorption of the PFOA from the Cl 8 solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge goes haywire there is no quality control measure that something went wrong and/or by how much. How does one prove that the LC/MS/MS methodology truly provided a result that is a non-detect when there is no surrogate in the method? Thus, DuPont knowingly switched to Exygen in 2001 and asked them to use a C-8 water method the accuracy of which would be much harder to verify. A. Representativeness No data are available from a drinking water system that give a reasonable estimate of the representativeness of the sample water. There is approximately four years of data for three pumping wells of the LPSD system between January 2000 and December 2003 (See Figures 2, 3, and 4). This data does not indicate a consistent concentration of PFOA in these wells which one would expect from the source and the Ohio River mixing and transport downstream to this well field. The analytical system's variability appears to supersede the precision and representativeness of the sampling and analysis. B. Completeness Completeness was not a concern of DuPont's until 1998. This was the time when a third party was first employed by DuPont to access the usability of the PFOA analytical results. This data validation was accomplished by Environmental Standards of Valley Forge, Pennsylvania because of DuPont's need to use the data for a US EPA RCRA investigation. They based their data validation on the US EPA 1994 National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review and the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). The standard operating procedure (SOP) for this data validation and a drinking water QAPP were not available to review. Data validation of the CH2M Hill and Lancaster Laboratory results for PFOA from 1998 2001 was qualified as estimated, biased low, or rejected. Most of the qualification of the results was due to the low percent recovery of surrogate, matrix, and/or laboratory control samples. C. Comparability DuPont's Washington Work's project director, Andrew Hartten, a hydrogeologist was concerned about the comparability of the data (lines 3 and 4, page 174 of the 2009 deposition and Exhibit #40) by at least early 2000 when he was first considering this in a C-8 lawsuit. From Mr. Hartten's 65 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 68 of 326 PAGEID #: 40230 VTRILLIUM 1N, e-mail,22223it appears that DuPont needed to "pursue an advanced analytical method that provides accurate results." This is 16 years after DuPont first started PFOA analysis in a water matrix. There are two points in this memo that are very important. First, DuPont does not consider the data obtained in the previous 16 years of PFOA in water to be accurate with a high level of confidence. Second, DuPont is worried that someone will find out that this is true if the comparability of the old and new data change by a factor of 3-5 times, which would become apparent if DuPont switched to the new, improved method Lancaster Laboratories was recommending at the time. Thus, DuPont was clearly worried about third parties learning of its underreported C-8 water levels if it switched to the method proposed by Lancaster Laboratories. This concern by DuPont is misplaced if their "objectives are always to try to use the best method available."224 D. The October 2000 Letter to the LPSD Customers. In October 2000, a letter was sent to the LPSD customers noting that C-8 was in their drinking water but assuring them it was safe because the levels found were all below DuPont's Community Exposure Guideline at 1 ppb. Yet the levels reported to be 0.2, 0.5 and 0.1 ppb were those provided by DuPont from August 2000 samples from three wells. The concentrations of PFOA are shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The question is about the accuracy, precision, and representativeness of the PFOA results shown in the figures and the office building (Figure 5), which is supposed to represent the drinking water of the system. However, the precision measurements were never made on the LPSD wells or system. The representativeness of the sampling was never tested as well. The accuracy of these analytical values is suspect because of the poor surrogate recoveries for the CH2M Hill method (see Table 19) as well as the lack of quality control for the calibration of the methods due to isomer amounts in the standard. The underestimation of PFOA values during this time frame have a high probability of being reported several times less than the actual values in the drinking water. Thus, DuPont knew that these results likely underrepresented the true concentration of C-8 and was worried about third party lawsuits if DuPont switched to Lancaster. On the same day that the water samples were obtained from the LPSD wells A, B, and F there was a sample taken from the main. This drinking water sample had a concentration for PFOA of 0.6 ppb. It is not possible to mix water containing 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 ppb PFOA to obtain a concentration of 0.6 ppb. As shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4, the 99.5 confidence interval for PFOA in wells A, B, and F strongly imply that these values are under reported. E. Summary of Opinions 1. Methods used by DuPont to measure the concentration of PFOA in water are not accurate and have led to reported levels of PFOA in drinking water supplies that are lower than the true value. 222 Deposition of Andrew Hatien Vol. II, November 6, 2009, Exhibit #40. 223 E-mail from Michelle J. Kolodziejski to Tara M. Spaide, October 1, 1999 (Bates No, P000016209, EID072379, & GW007427). 224 Andrew Hartenn 2009 deposition page 268 lines 2 and 3. 66 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 69 of 326 PAGEID #: 40231 * Tt r il l iu m inc 2. DuPont was aware that the PFOA levels in drinking water were reported lower than the true concentration values, and DuPont had the knowledge and expertise to correct the discrepancy in the data. 3. Prior to the water analysis performed by Exygen in 2001, the PFOA concentrations in drinking water were higher than reported by DuPont and exceeded 1 ppb on numerous occasions. 4. The information concerning the October letter to the LPSD water customers about PFOA concentrations in drinking water was not accurate and PFOA concentrations were underreported. 5. Forensic techniques to age date the PFOA using the isomers of PFOA were not performed. The FC-143 produced by 3M and used by DuPont at the Washington Works plant prior to 2002 REDACTED which was used by DuPont after 2002. According to Hyeong-Moo Shin et ah, PFOA entered the municipal water supplies via air transport and deposition of PFOA from the Washington Works plant. ' It is unknown whether this PFOA is from the use of FC143 from 3M by the Washington Works facility, or C-8 from the PFOA made by DuPont and used after 2002 when the 3M PFOA was no longer available. Isomer analysis could be of forensic aid in the transport mechanism as well as making the analytical results more reliable. 6. Three decades of qualitative and quantitative analysis of PFOA for the health and safety of employees and the Washington Works plant community by one of the world's major chemical companies shows that the analytical sampling and analysis are still questionable due to accuracy, precision, representativeness, completeness, and comparability concerns. None of these analytical chemistry concerns apply to other chemicals of considerable and probable health concerns, such as dioxin, or polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAFls), or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). All of these substances are semi-volatile compounds like PFOA and their sampling and analysis can be accomplished to very low concentrations accurately and precisely. There is a disconnect in the approach to accurate and precise analytical chemistry of PFOA. This disconnect has led to DuPont's underestimation and underreporting of PFOA concentrations and the reluctance to correct the analytical system. When the analytical data is questionable it causes the users of the results to make corrections that assume the worst case scenarios. This is exactly the sentiment portrayed by Bernard J. Reilly, DuPont's lawyer, in an email to his son on May 7, 2001:25*27 Got a call about 2130 when in bed last night from one o f our engineers worrying about our technique for measuring surfactant at Parkersburg. We learned recently that our analytical technique has very poor recovery, often 25%, so any results we 225 Hyeong-Moo Shin, et al., Environmental Fate and Transport Modeling for Perfluorooctanoic Acid Emitted from the Washington Works Facility in West Virginia, Environmental Science and Technology 2011 45, pp. 1435-1432. Hyeong-Moo Shin, et al., Modeling the Air-Soil Transport Pathway of Perfluorooctanoic acid in the Mid-Ohio Valley Using Linked Air Dispersion and Vadose Zone Models, Atmospheric Environmental 2012, 51, pp. 67-74. 227Andrew Hartenn 2009 deposition page 279 and Exhibit #45 (Bates No. EDD0073970). 67 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 70 of 326 PAGEID #: 40232 ^ \TRILLIUM,nc get should be multiplied by afactor o f 4 or even 5. However, that has not been the practice, so we have been telling the agencies results that surely are low. Not a pretty situation, especially since we have been telling the drinking water folks not to worry, results have been under the level we deem 'safe' o f 1 ppb. We now fear we will get data from a better technique that will exceed the number we have touted as safe, Ugh. The real essence of the e-mail is that DuPont grew concerned about the percent recovery problem of its PFOA underreporting analytical methods only after being sued over such issues even though DuPont was fully aware of and had been authorizing the use of these methods. This analytical work had been going on for 17 years. The word at the end of the paragraph is "Ugh," and there is the truth. VIII. QUALIFICATIONS/EXPERIENCE/PUBLICATIONS James S. Smith, Ph.D., CPC Credentials Ph.D. Organic Chemistry - Iowa State University (1964) B.A. Chemistry, with honors thesis - Williams College (1960) N.I.H. Postdoctoral Fellowship, Organic Chemistry - University of Illinois (1965 66) Visiting Lecturer, General and Organic Chemistry - University of Illinois (1966) Assistant Professor, Organic and Analytical Chemistry - Eastern Michigan University (1966-68) N.I.H. Postdoctoral Fellowship, Organic Mass Spectrometry - Cornell University (1968-69) American Chemical Society (1960 to present) Chairman of the Mass Spectrometry discussion group, 1970-71 American Society for Testing and Materials Committee D-19 on Water (1979 to present) Committee D-18 on Soil and Rock (1993 to present) American Society of Mass Spectroscopists Association of Official Analytical Chemists Technical Division on Reference Materials National Ground Water Association The American Institute of Chemists (AIC) (1992 to present) Fellow, American Institute of Chemists (FAIC) Certified Professional Chemist (CPC) Board of Directors (2002 - 2004) American Academy of Forensic Sciences (1997 to present) Fellow - Engineering Sciences Section Chairman of the Engineering Sciences Section (2003) Recipient of the Engineering Sciences Section Andrew Payne, Jr. Special Achievement Award (2002) 68 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 40233 Experience Summary Consulting 1987 to Present - President/Chemist, Trillium, Inc., Coatesville, PA 1985 to 1987 - Chemistry Manager, Walter B. Satterthwaite Associates, Inc., West Chester, PA 1981 to 1985 - Laboratory Director, Roy F. Weston, Inc., West Chester, PA Industrial 1969 to 1981 - Manager, Corporate Research Center, Analytical Department, Allied Chemical Corporation (Now Honeywell), Morristown, NJ Academic 1968 to 1969 - N.I.H. Postdoctoral Fellow, Cornell University - Mass Spectrometry 1966 to 1968 - Assistant Professor, Eastern Michigan University 1964 to 1966 - Visiting Lecturer and N.I.H. Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Illinois Publications And Presentations For The Last 10 Years Smith, J.S., "Is Your Analytical Result Accurate?, " 57th Annual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 21-26, 2005. Smith, J.S., "Forensic Science, "Presented at the Harford County Teachers Inservice Day, Bel Air, Maryland, April 7, 2005. Smith, J.S., "Is Your Analytical Result Accurate?, "GSA North-Central Section 39th Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 20, 2005. Smith, J.S. and C. McLane, "Environmental Forensics: Methods and Applications, " National Ground Water Association Seminar, Baltimore, Maryland, July 19-20, 2005. Smith, J.S., "Is Your Analytical Result Accurate?, "2005 National Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, July 22, 2005. Smith, J.S. and C. McLane, "Environmental Forensics: Concepts and Applications, " National Ground Water Association Course, Columbus, Ohio, June 20-21, 2006. Smith, J.S., "Daubert Rules Challenge Scientists, "2006 National Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Chicago, Illinois, July 6, 2006. 69 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 72 of 326 PAGEID #: 40234 I t RILLIUK/Lc Lane, V.A. and J.S. Smith, "Fact or Fiction: The Source o f Perchloroethylene Contamination in Groundwater is a Manufacturing Impurity in Chlorinated Solvents, " 2006 National Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Chicago, Illinois, July 6, 2006. Smith, J.S. and G.W. DeWitt, "ReleasedHydrocarbons - Aerobically or Anerobically Biodegraded, " 2006 National Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Chicago, Illinois, July 7, 2006. DeWitt, G.W. and J.S. Smith, "First-Order Exponential Regression of Ethylbenzene/Xylenes Ratiosfor Estimating Release Date, " 2006 National Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Chicago, Illinois, July 7, 2006. Smith, J.S. and C. McLane, "Environmental Forensics: Methods and Applications, " National Ground Water Association Seminar, Houston, Texas, November 8-9, 2006. Smith, J.S. and G.W. DeWitt, "ReleasedPetroleum Products Containing BTEX- Aerobic or Anaerobic Biodegradation, " 59thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, San Antonio, Texas, February 22, 2007. Smith, J.S. and C. McLane, "Environmental Forensics: Methods and Applications, " National Ground Water Association Course, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, June 26-27, 2007. Peale, James G.D., M. French, and J.S. Smith, "Perception vs. Reality: Countering Claims o f Co-solvency Effects Using Good Science, "NGWA Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Dublin, Ohio, July 24, 2007. Smith, J.S. and K.L. Shoop, "ESI: Environmental Scene Investigation, Who are You?, " NGWA Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Dublin, Ohio, July 25, 2007. Smith, J.S., B.L. John, and C.A. Erikson, "Automobile Shredder Residue: Waste or Wasted Resource?, "NGWA Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, Dublin, Ohio, July 25, 2007. Lane, V.A. and J.S. Smith, "Fact or Fiction: The Source o f Perchloroethylene Contamination in Groundwater is a Manufacturing Impurity in Chlorinated Solvents, " The 23ldAnnual International Conference on Soils, Sediments and Water, Amherst, Massachusetts, October 15-18, 2007. Smith, J.S. and C.A. Erikson, "Automobile Shredder Residue: Waste or Wasted Resource?, " 60th Annual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Washington, D.C., February 21, 2008. Peale, James G.D., M. French, and J.S. Smith, "Perception vs. Reality: Countering Claims 70 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 73 of 326 PAGEID #: 40235 ^ \ T R I L L I U M , nc o f Co-solvency Effects Using Good Science, " 60thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Washington, D.C., February 22, 2008. Smith, J.S. and M. Zdepski, "New Jersey Hillbillies, " 60thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Washington, D.C., February 22, 2008. DeWitt, G.W., J.S. Smith, and F.J. Hoitash, "Determination of Free-Phase Conditions Using Ethylbenzene/Xylenes Ratios, "NGWA 2008 Ground Water Summit, Memphis, Tennessee, March 31, 2008. Smith, J.S. and S. Pitkin, "Environmental Forensics: Methods and Applications, " National Ground Water Association Course, Denver, Colorado, June 9-10, 2008. DeWitt, G.W., J.S. Smith, and F.J. Hoitash, "Determination o fFree-Phase Conditions Using Ethylbenzene/Xylenes Ratios, "61st Annual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Denver, Colorado, February 20, 2009. Smith, J.S. and S. Pitkin, "Environmental Forensics: Methods and Applications, " National Ground Water Association Course, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 15-16, 2009. Adamus, G.M., K.S. Murray, G.W. DeWitt, and J.S. Smith, "Review o f Groundwater Ethylbenzene/Xylenes Model to Estimate Petroleum Release Date, "Air and Waste Management Association 102 Annual Conference, Detroit, Michigan, June 17, 2009. Smith, J.S., "Some Chemistry Concerning Vapor Intrusion, "Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists, New York - Philadelphia Section Meeting, Somerset, New Jersey, January 19, 2011. Smith, J.S., "Environmental Forensics: A Repository For Junk Science, "63st Annual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, February 24, 2011. Hadka, M.C. and J.S. Smith, "Finding the Genie in a Bottle, " 64thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, February 23, 2012. Erikson, C.A. and J.S. Smith, "Chemistry Ignored-A Case Study, " 64th Annual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, February 23, 2012. DeWitt, G.W. and J.S. Smith, "Free Product Determination Using Ethylbenzene to Total Xylenes Ratio, "64thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, February 23, 2012. Smith, J.S., The Road to the Supreme Court, "64thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, February 23, 2012. Smith, J.S., Attorneys, Journalists, Environmental Forensic Scientists, and Four 71 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 74 of 326 PAGEID #: 40236 ' ( trillium Words, " 64thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, February 23, 2012. Smith, J.S., "Environmental Site Forensic Investigations: Where Junk Science in Litigation is King, "The American Institute of Chemists Annual Meeting, E. Carmichael Members & Fellows Lecture, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 13, 2012. Smith, J.S., "Environmental Chemistry, " 65thAnnual Meeting, American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Washington, D.C., February 21, 2013. Smith, J.S., "Nothing Has Changed in Environmental Forensics, " Guest Editorial, The Chemist. Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 33-34, April 2014. IX. PRIOR TESTIMONY FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS Deposition Testimony Dattilo Realty v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Civil Action No. 2:09-CV-02278 Expert for Plaintiff David R. Forrey, Esquire Lewis & Forrey, L.L.C. 34 Chambers Street Princeton, NJ 08542 (609) 924-0180 Date o fDeposition Testimony: January 11, 2011 James V. Atria, Jr. And Margaret Mary Atria v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.. Tiger Claw, Inc. D/b/a Exxon; ExxonMobil; New Jersey Department of Transportation; John Doe 1-10: GHI, Co. 1-10 (said names being fictitious, and Cumberland Farms. Inc., v. Sunoco, Inc.; Barker Bus Company. Martha s Cleaners and Launderers, Inc. And John Does 1-10 (said names being fictitious. Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division - Somerset County, Docket No. SOM-L-1647-04 Expert for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff - Cumberland Farms, Inc. Martha N. Donovan, Esquire Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A. 721 Route 202-206, Suite 200 P.O. Box 5933 Bridgewater, NJ 08807 (908) 722-0700 Date o fDeposition Testimony: November 8, 2011 72 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 75 of 326 PAGEID #: 40237 TRILLIUM 1HC. The Newark Group. Inc, v. Crown Beverage Packaging, Inc, and Continental Holdings, Inc., Commonwealth of Massachusetts - Middlesex - Superior Court, Docket No. C.A. 09-4552 Expert for Plaintiff Amy E. Boyd, Esquire Jonathan M. Ettinger, Esquire Foley Hoag LLP Seaport World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, MA 02210 (617) 832-1000 Dates o fDeposition Testimony: July 24, 2012 and April 24, 2013 Richard Catena v. Raytheon Company, etc., et als., Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division: Bergen County, Docket No. BER-L-1267-11 Expert for Defendant - Raytheon Company Dennis Krumholz, Esquire Michele Glass, Esquire Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti, LLP Headquarters Plaza One Speedwell Avenue Morristown, NJ 07962 (973) 538-0800 Dates o fDeposition Testimony: March 5, 2013, March 6, 2013, March 12, 2013, and March 28, 2013 Tri-Realty Company v. Ursinus College. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:11-05885 Expert for Plaintiff Scott J. Etish, Esquire Gibbons, P.C. 1700 Two Logan Square 18th & Arch Streets Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 446-6261 Date o fDeposition Testimony: July 22, 2014 73 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 76 of 326 PAGEID #: 40238 * ( trillium , Trial Testimony Before the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, Applicant: Michelin North America, Inc., Respondent: Gary S. Walker, Director, Petroleum Storage Tank Division, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, Relief Sought: Determination of Jurisdiction, Cause No. PSD 200800004 Expert for Applicant - Michelin North America, Inc. Connie M. Bryan, Esquire Rubenstein McCormick & Pitts, P.L.L.C. 1503 East 19th Street Edmond, OK 73013 (405) 340-1900 Date o f Hearing Testimony: April 22, 2010 and March 2 and 3, 2011 James V. Atria, Jr. And Margaret Mary Atria v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., Tiger Claw, Inc. D/b/a Exxon; Exxon Mobil: New Jersey Department of Transportation: John Doe 1-10: GHI, Co. 1-10 (said names being fictitious, and Cumberland Farms, Inc., v. Sunoco, Inc.; Barker Bus Company, Martha's Cleaners and Launderers, Inc. And John Does 1-10 (said names being fictitious. Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division - Somerset County, DocketNo. SOM-L-1647-04 Expert for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff - Cumberland Farms, Inc. Martha N. Donovan, Esquire Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A. 721 Route 202-206, Suite 200 P.O. Box 5933 Bridgewater, NJ 08807 (908)722-0700 Date o f Trial Testimony: February 28, 2012 X. COMPENSATION The basis of compensation for James S. Smith, Ph.D. is an hourly rate of $250.00, including deposition testimony and plus expenses, per Trillium, Inc.'s January 6, 2014, Professional Fee Schedule. 74 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 77 of 326 PAGEID #: 40239 ' (TRILLIUM, XI. SIGNATORY The preceding report includes opinions that I hold to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty and represents my best professional judgment based on the documents and facts with which I have been presented, and my training and experience. I reserve the right to update this 75 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 78 of 326 PAGEID #: 40240 Figure 1. Page 19 from CH2M Hill's October 1991method "Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Water" (Bates No. EID149549, HLG000216). GC/ECD Chromatogram showing multiple peaks for FC-143. Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 79 of 326 PAGEID #: 40241 Lubeck New Wells - Well A Figure 2. C-8 Results for LPSD Well A. Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 80 of 326 PAGEID #: 40242 Lubeck New Wells - W ell B Figure 3. C-8 Results for LPSD Well B. Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 81 of 326 PAGEID #: 40243 Figure 4. C-8 Results for LPSD Well F. Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 82 of 326 PAGEID #: 40244 Lubeck New W ells - W ater Main/Office Building Figure 5. C-8 Results for LPSD Water Main/Office Building. Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 83 of 326 PAGEID #: 40245 \ TRILLIUM, PROFESSIONAL FEE SCHEDULE PF.RSO NNEL Jam es $. Sm ith, Ph.D. (Includes Deposition) Jam es S. Sm ith, Ph.D . (Trial Testim ony) M ichael C. Hadka. Ph.D. (Includes Deposition) M ichael C. H adka, Ph.D. ( Trial T estim ony) Carol A. Erikson Elizabeth K. D ickinson Patricia A. Cochran All Staff** TITLE P resident'C hem ist President Chem ist C hem ist Chem ist Quality A ssessm ent M anager Quality A ssessm ent M anager Quality A ssessm ent M anager Data V alidation Services H O U R LY RATI $250.00 S500.00 SI 50.00 S300.00 $125.00* $125.00* S 125.00* $ 90.00 Technical Assistant A dm inistrative Assistant S 75.00 S 40.00 Trial Testimony billed at two times normal hourly tee. per the above rate schedule. All StalT- Services for rush turnaround time requirements (required turnaround times o f one week or less) billed at two times the norma! hourly fee. per the above rate schedule. RaiCN f'lTcctivc JanuaiA 06. 2014 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 84 of 326 PAGEID #: 40246 ~ Vtrillium APPENDIX A INFORMATION CONSIDERED, REVIEWED, AND/OR RELIED UPON Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 85 of 326 PAGEID #: 40247 2/14/2001 5/2/2001 6/6/2002 6/7/2002 11/15/2002 4/30/2004 11/19/2004 6/4/2009 11/6/2009 \ TRILLIUM Deposition of Robert Ritchey. Deposition of Andrew Hartten Vol. I, with exhibits. Deposition of Dee Ann Staats Vol. I, with exhibits. Deposition of Dee Ann Staats Vol. II, with exhibits. Deposition of Herbert David Ramsey with exhibits. Deposition of Glenn R. Evers with exhibits. Deposition of Timothy Bingman with exhibits. Deposition of Shane Snyder with exhibits. Deposition of Andrew Hartten Vol. II, with exhibits A1 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 86 of 326 PAGEID #: 40248 5/1979 \ TRILLIUM Procedures for landfill monitoring and sampling. Pages 26-70. (Bates No. EID070739-EID070776, GW007141-GW007185). Table of Bottom Ash and Fly ash results. (Bates No. EID035100, JMM005733). List of groundwater monitoring wells at Dry Run Landfill (Bates No. EID018019-EID-018021). Mass spectra for F-113 and F-11, and comparative plot of F-11 and F113 mass ions. (Bates No. EID009800-EID009802, RLR00736-RLR00738). Table 1: Sludge Test Results and EP Toxicity Test results (Bates No. EID034753-EID034754). Table 1: Sludge Test Results and EP Toxicity Test results [Same as document listed above.] (Bates No. EID008656, RLR000150). Hand written "Michigan Report" w/ fluoride concentrations in urine and bone. (Bates No. EID017257, RAK007392). Appendix F-Pages 23-52. (Bates No. EID034693-EID034722, JMM005831-JMM005859). Fluoride Sources to Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID067263, JMM002370). Note to Dry Run Landfill Team Members. Summary of Kemron results for split samples. (Bates No. EID034884, DDJ001231). EPA suspicion of TIC and Freon 13. (Bates No. EID066106, GPS000607). Hand written notes of fly ash, filter press, supernatant pond, and bio-waste activities. (Bates No. EID066107-EID066108, RV000433&RV000437). News release questions and answers. (Bates No. EID063140EID063143, DDJ000960-DDJ000963). Aerial photograph (Bates No. EID021516.01). Article Grout-Induced Temperature Rise Surrounding Wells, Molz, Fred J. and Carl E. Kurt, Groundwater, Vol. 17, No. 3, May-June 1979. A2 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 87 of 326 PAGEID #: 40249 \ TRILLIUM 04/20/1980 - Waste Classification forms including some MSDS (Bates No. 05/12/199 EID035852-EID035961, JMM005456-JMM005565). 08/12/1980 - RCRA Waste Classification forms. (Bates No. EID036030-EID036042, 12/04/1980 JMM005634-JMM005646). 11/12/1980 Memo from C.J. Babcock and C.F. Nelson to H. Moncure and R.L. Hall re: extraction of heavy metals from structural polymers. (Bates No. EID036034-EID036035, JMM005638-JMM005639). 9/21/1981 Memo from D.H. Snyder to J.J. Di Nicola re: copy of landfill information sheet. (Bates No. EID022224-EID022225, CF001293-CF001294). 10/23/1981 Memo from C.F. Nelson to A.R. Stoltenberg and W.T. Darnell re: operations involved during the start-up phase of Krolor pigments. (Bates No. EID036038-EID036040, JMM005642-JMM005644). 10/28/1981 Hand written memo from Dan to CWK re: required to notify EPA if "new" hazardous waste is introduced. (Bates No. EID036037, JMM005641). 12/16/1981 Kemron chromium and lead results for three samples collected 12/8/81. (Bates No. EID036044). 12/21/1981 Memo from from C.F. Nelson to R.L. Tewksbury re: amounts of lead and chromate extracted from RYNITE Homelite Red are below RCRA limits. (Bates No. EID036043, JMM005647). 3/8/1982 Memo from J.B. Armitage to D.H. Snyder re: acute oral toxicity levels. (Bates No. EID030008, CF001285). 4/30/1982 Kemron EP Tox. metals results for one bottom ash sample. (Bates No. EID035180-EID035181, JMM005813-JMM005814). 6/18/1982 Application for Water Pollution Control Permit for Disposal of Industrial Waste by Landfill. Includes cover letter from A.C. Huston to David Robinson re: application for new landfill site. (Bates No. EID051410EID051490, CF001891-CF001971). 10/26/1982 Letter from James J. McKenna to A.C. Huston re: Water Pollution Control Permit. (Bates No. EID050965-EID050999, CF001224CF001258). 5/1/1984 Initial, Quarterly, and Monthly Sampling results. Includes sampling requirements and memo from T.J. Fortenberry to F.W. Fly. (Bates No. A3 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 88 of 326 PAGEID #: 40250 5/16/1984 5/18/1984 5/23/1984 9/20/1984 2/15/1985 2/20/1985 5/9/1985 8/14/1985 9/6/1985 9/12/1985 9/12/1985 9/16/1985 10/10/1985 \ TRILLIUM EID022602-EID022631, RAK003776-RAK003805). Memo from Helen to Ach re: phenolics results for monitoring well samples. Initial Comprehensive Well Report Form. Includes cover letter from A.C. Huston to Heidi Kammer. (Bates No. EID018183-EID018192, CF001827-CF001836). Memo from J. A. Schmid to T. M. Kemp and T. L. Schrenk, re: C-8 Meeting Summary 5/2284 - Wilmington. (Bates No. EID602999EID602300). Kemron, EP Tox metals results for two polyvinyl butyral samples. (Bates No. EID035105, JMM005738). Technical Testing ash mineral results for Bottom Ash No. 6 Boiler. (Bates No. EID035104, JMM005737). Technical Testing results for ash mineral and bottom ash. (Bates No. EID031332-EID031333). Washington Works Ash and Coal Constituents. (Bates No. EID035164EID035165, JMM005797-JMM005798). Memo from L.B. Dahl to A.J. Playtis re: Triton levels in upstream supernate pond sludge (Bates No. EID007978, RAK002874). Memo from M. Kruempelman to L.B. Dahl re: analysis of supernate sludge sample for C8. (Bates No. EID007979-EID007980, RAK002875RAK002876). Memo from L.B. Dahl to A.C. Huston and J.J. Di Nicola re: C-8 and Triton levels in supernate pond sludge analysis. (Bates No. EID007976EID007977, RAK002872-RAK002873). Memo from L.B. Dahl to A.C. Huston and J.J. Di Nicola re: C-8 and Triton levels in supernate pond sludge analysis. [Same as above docuemt.] (Bates No. EID034755-EID034759). Memo from John Doughty to Art Huston re: identified material found at landfill as Delrin fluff. (Bates No. EID039584, RLR002117). Letter from A.C. Huston to Heidi Kammer (WVDNR). re: proposed construction of sediment basin at Industrial Waste Landfill. (Bates No. A4 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 89 of 326 PAGEID #: 40251 10/11/1985 10/25/1985 1/21/1986 4/29/1986 12/3/1986 Jan-87 6/22/1987 6/29/1987 7/27/1987 7/30/1987 7/30/1987 \ TRILLIUM EID018230-EID018243, CF001813-CF001826). Vegetation survey report from Charles E. Anderson (Pollution Solutions, Inc.). (EID070493-EID070589). Letter from A.C. Huston to R.M. Sovic (WVDWR). re: propose to dispose of truck which was contaminated with antimony pentachloride in Dry Run landfill. (Bates No. EID050951-EID050952, CF001811CF001812). Letter from Carlo Castaldini (Acurex Corp.) to Art Huston (DuPont) re: EP Tox. results for ash streams. [Includes analytical results from Environmental Research Group, Inc.]. (Bates No. EID035106EID035108, JMM005739-JMM005741). Memo from Linda H. Hall to H.E. Bumgarner re: extraction of water samples produced an oily residue identified as Santicizer 8. Includes TOC results and IR scans. (Bates No. EID039580-EID039582, RLR002113-RLR002115). NUS metals results for concentrated sludge sample collected 10/20/86. (Bates No. EID035646, JMM006946). Metal Content of Sludge in ppm - 1986 data. (Bates No. EID035632, JMM006962). Memo from R.L. Carlsen to A.C. Huston re: codisposal of bio-sludge and powerhouse fly ash. (Bates No. EID029686-EID029687, GW000038GW000039). ETC Technical Report for water sample collected 6/4/87. (Bates No. EID034911-EID034927, CF001525-CF001541). Fuel Engineering Company of New York results for dried bio pond sludge sample received 7/7/87. (Bates No. EID035615, JMM006945). Letter from A.C. Huston to David Robinson (WVDWR). re: planned physical change at plant resulting in minor change in the waste material disposed on in Dry Run Landfill and results of sludge test. (EID007534EID007535, JMM003564-JMM003565). Letter from A.C. Huston to David Robinson (WVDWR). re: planned physical change at plant resulting in minor change in the waste material disposed on in Dry Run Landfill and results of sludge test. [Same as document above] (EID051927-EID051928, GW006726-GW006727). A5 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 90 of 326 PAGEID #: 40252 \ TRILLIUM 8/10/1987 8/19/1987 9/15/1987 9/15/1987 9/18/1987 9/28/1987 10/15/1987 11/20/1987 12/15/1987 12/15/1987 12/17/1987 Letter from A.C. Huston to David W. Robinson re: request modification of landfill permit to include activated sludge wastewater treatment plant waste sludge. (Bates No. EID051100-EID051103, JMM0070270JMM007030). NPDES Permit Application. Includes cover letter from A.C. Huston to David Robinson. (Bates No. EID052236-EID052346, CF001690CF001799). Letter from A.C. Huston to David W. Robinson (DNR). re: expected annual volume of mixed flyash and activated sludge and expected amounts of TOC, COD, MBAS, and Zn in EP Tox analysis of sludge. (Bates No. WVDEP 0093-WVDEP 0095). Letter from A.C. Huston to David W. Robinson (DNR). re: expected annual volume of mixed flyash and activated sludge and expected amounts of TOC, COD, MBAS, and Zn in EP Tox analysis of sludge. [Same as document listed above] (Bates No. EID051929-EID051931, GW006728-GW006730). Letter from John Britvec to A.C. Huston re: agency concurs with modification discussed in 7/30/87 letter. (Bates No. EID051095EID051096, CF001564-CF001565). Letter from D.W. Robinson to A.C. Huston re: request to include wastewater treatment plant waste sludge in Dry Run Landfill granted. (Bates No. EID051104, CF001562). Memo from Chris Amick to John Britvec re: results and notes from compliance monitoring sample performed 7/29/87. Includes cover letter from John Britvec to A.C. Huston dated 11/12/87. (Bates No. EID022649-EID022657, CF001542-CF001550). Kemron EP Tox results for one Emergency Tank sample received 11/9/87. (Bates No. EID036084, JMM005688). Kemron results for total and TCLP metals for #2 Incinerator Ash. (Bates No. EID034686-EID034687, CF001523-CD001524). Kemron results for total and TCLP metals for #2 Incinerator Ash. (Bates No. EID035965-EID035966, JMM005569-JMM005570). Letter from D.W. Robinson to A.C. Huston re: modification granted to dispose of 7,100 tons of non-hazardous sludge and dirt. (Bates No. A6 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 91 of 326 PAGEID #: 40253 12/17/1987 12/17/1987 2/3/1988 3/1/1988 3/14/1988 4/14/1988 5/12/1988 8/29/1988 12/1/1988 12/29/1988 1/25/1989 2/2/1989 3/9/1989 \ TRILLIUM EID051114, CF001520). Letter from D.W. Robinson to A.C. Huston re: modification granted to dispose of 7,100 tons of non-hazardous sludge and dirt. [Same as document listed above] (Bates No. EID051926, GW006725). Letter from D.W. Robinson to A.C. Huston re: modification granted to dispose of 7,100 tons of non-hazardous sludge and dirt. [Same as document listed above] (Bates No. EID034760, JMM005900). EOD No. P-0085 Closing Report. [Includes inorganics data] (Bates No. EID015230-EID015248, RAK005992-RAK006010). Report of flyash-bipond sludge codisposal test. Includes letter from A.C. Huston to John Britvec re: request to modify permit to landfill activated sludge and flyash mixture. (Bates No. EID051139-EID051143, JMM003919-JMM003923). Letter from D.W. Robinson (WVDEP) to A.C. Huston re: NPDES permit extended because contract laboratory may not have run leachability test correctly; test will be rerun. (Bates No. EID007481, CF001511). Letter from A.C. Huston to John Britvec re: results for leachability tests. (Bates No. EID051135-EID051138, JMM003772-JMM003775). Memo from C.J. Babcock to D.H. Snyder re: results for sludge/fly ash testing. (Bates No. EID029688-EID029694, GW000040-GW000046). NUS metals results for concentrated sludge sample received 7/21/88. (Bates No. EID035643, JMM006973). Kemron mercury result for one fluorescent bulb received 11/18/88. (Bates No. EID035109, JMM005742). Technical Testing laboratory analysis report for two ash samples (Bates No. EID034689-EID034692). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 10/12/88. (Bates No. EID035642, JMM006972). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 1/10/89. (Bates No. EID035641, JMM006971). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 1/10/89. (Bates No. EID035636, JMM006966). A7 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 92 of 326 PAGEID #: 40254 \ TRILLIUM 3/9/1989 3/9/1989 3/9/1989 3/9/1989 3/10/1989 3/30/89 3/30/1989 5/9/1989 5/10/1989 5/10/1989 5/11/1989 5/17/1989 6/13/1989 NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 1/10/89. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035637, JMM006967). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 10/12/88. (Bates No. EID035638, JMM006968). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 10/12/88. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035639, JMM006969). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 10/12/88. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035640, JMM006970). Letter from Laidely Eli McCoy (WVDEP) to A.C. Huston re: authorization to operate under permits until formal permit action are necessary. (Bates No. EID051115-EID051116, GW004177-GW004178). Kemron EP Tox. metals results for bio pond sludge collected 3/13/89. (Bates No. EID035605-EID035606, JMM006935-JMM006936). Kemron EP Tox. metals results for bio pond sludge collected 3/13/89. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID035629-EID035630, JMM006959-JMM006960). Letter from A.C. Huston to John Britvec re: map of five new monitoring wells. (Bates No. EID007491-EID007492, CF002338-CF002339). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond sludge collected 4/24/89. (Bates No. EID035602-EID035604, JMM006932-JMM006934). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond sludge collected 4/24/89. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID035626-EID035628, JMM006956JMM006958). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 4/18/89. (Bates No. EID035635, JMM006965). Memo from W.B. West to A.C. Huston, W.M. Stewart, and R.J. Yoak re: test well sampling (performed 5/11/89). for Appendix IX. (Bates No. EID022647-EID022648, GW000065-GW000066). Letter from H.V. Bradley to Mr. William R. Packard re: Appendix IX results from the analysis of well 27. (Bates No. EID022636-EID022646, GW000054-GW000064). A8 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 93 of 326 PAGEID #: 40255 6/21/1989 6/23/1989 7/17/1989 8/3/1989 8/8/1989 8/8/1989 9/29/1989 Oct-89 12/6/1989 1/2/1990 1/12/1990 1/12/1990 2/16/1990 \ TRILLIUM Letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to A.C. Huston re: modifications necessary to landfill as a result of new Solid Waste Management Regulations. (Bates No. EID007493-EID007494, CF002326-CF002327). Kemron results for eight water samples collected 5/19/89. (Bates No. EID036157-EID036174, GW006345-GW006362). Interoffice memo from Arthur C. Huston, Jr. To Gerald A. Ploeger re: PCBs all ND. (Bates No. EID022635, GW000053). Interoffice Memo from Harold Bumgarner to distribution re: repair to leak in Lower Pond of Dry Run. (Bates No. EID014083, CF001177). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 7/17/89. (Bates No. EID035633, JMM006963). NUS metals results for bio pond sludge sample collected 7/17/89. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035634, JMM006964). Interoffice memo from Billy d. Garner to distribution re: installation of new wells at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID014114, GW001074). Monitoring Well Installation Program prepared by Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc. (Bates No. EID070639-EID070694, ASH000192ASH000245, RJZ000002). Letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to A.C. Huston re: groundwater sample collected from specified monitoring wells and analyzed for total metals. (Bates No. EID051983-EID051984, CF002204-CF002205). Letter from A.C. Huston to Laidley Eli McCoy re: permits require sampling of Dry Run wells only. Sampling of Letart wells will also be performed. (Bates No. EID051122-EID051123, CF002198-CF002199). Letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to A.C. Huston re: response to comments in 10/20/89 letter. (Bates No. EID051932-EID051933, GW004299GW004300). Water Pollution Control Permit (Bates No. EID051509-EID051550, JMM001092-JMM001133). Notice of Appeal. Includes cover letters from David Yaussy (Robinson & McElwee to Arthur C. Huston, Jr. (DuPont) and Frances E. Hunter (State Water Resources Board). (Bates No. EID051858-EID051875, JRM000773-JRM000790). A9 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 94 of 326 PAGEID #: 40256 \ TRILLIUM 3/14/1990 3/14/1990 3/14/1990 Apr-90 4/18/1990 4/23/1990 4/24/1990 4/30/1990 5/11/1990 5/23/1990 6/12/1990 6/13/1990 7/26/1990 Memo from L.C. Diaz (Engineering Services Div.) to W.M. Stewart (Washington Works). re: replacement of Dry Run Well 14. (Bates No. EID015127-EID015128). Letter from Christopher Burns to Lisa Diaz re: restoration/replacement of Well #14. (Bates No. EID015129-EID015130). Letter from Christopher Burns to Lisa Diaz re: pros and cons of restoration of Well #14. (Bates No. EID015131-EID015135). Construction of Monitoring Well #14 Dry Run Landfill, prepared by Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc. (Bates No. EID015142-EID015153). Kemron Appendix IX results for four samples collected 3/27/90. (Bates No. EID034990-EID035055, GW001160-GW001225). Kemron Appendix IX results for three samples collected 3/27/90. (Bates No. EID034928-EID034989, GW001098-GW001159). Kemron TCLP metals results for one incinerator ash sample collected 4/23/90. (Bates No. EID012554, JMM006203). TCLP results for one fly ash sample collected 4/23/90. Work Order # N004-276. (Bates No. EID030508, JMM005817). Operations Manual for Dry Run. [Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy.] (Bates No. EID007495-EID007428, CF002037-CF002070). Kemron TCLP results for six samples collected 4/23/90. [Metals results only] (Bates No. EID035056-EID035057, EID035163, EID035182EID35184, JMM005689-JMM005690, JMM005796, JMM003965JMM003968). Dry Run Quarterly Monitoring Well Report and Monitoring Well Construction Information. Includes cover letter from H. Verlon Bradley to L. Eli McCoy. [Hand written note on letter "see corrected report"]. (Bates No. EID022658-EID022695, JMM003350-JMM03386). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Paul Rader (WV Air Pollution Control Commission) re: Asbestos Removal Notification form. (Bates No. EID007529-EID007532, RAK005764-RAK005767). C-8 in ppm. Dry Run Landfill quarterly Routine Samples. (Bates No. A10 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 95 of 326 PAGEID #: 40257 7/27/1990 8/15/1990 8/17/1990 8/23/1990 9/4/1990 10/8/1990 10/8/1990 10/8/1990 10/8/1990 10/8/1990 10/8/1990 10/17/1990 \ TRILLIUM EID035186, JMM003702). Interoffice memo from Penny C. Mahoney to distribution list re: Dry Run Landfill slope. (Bates No. EID018035, CF001175). Interoffice memo from Penny C. Mahoney to distribution list re: minutes of meeting held on 8/14/90. (Bates No. EID008308, CF001157). Interoffice memo fro Penny C. Mahoney to Billy D. Garner re: supernate sludge removal strategy. (Bates No. EID005686-EID005687, CF001155CF001156). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Max Robertson (WVDNR) re: intent to relocate fluoropolymer contaminated sludge from Dry Run landfill to Letart landfill. (Bates No. EID051924-EID051925, GW006723GW006724). Kemron Appendix XI results for one Dry Run sludge sample collected 8/23/90. WO# NO-08-282. (Bates No. EID035141-EID035148, JMM005774-JMM005781). Kemron TCLP metals preliminary results for three samples collected 9/12/90. WO# N0-09-173. (Bates No. EID035060-EID035061, JMM003988-JMM003991). Kemron TCLP metals results for three samples collected 9/12/90. WO# N0-09-173. (Bates No. EID035221-EID035224, JMM005693JMM005694). Kemron TCLP metals results for three samples. (Bates No. EID034890EID034893, RAK006044-RAK006047). Kemron TCLP metals results for three samples. [Same as document listed above] (Bates No. EID012532-EID012535). Kemron EP Tox metals results for bio pond sludge collected 10/8/90. (Bates No. EID035599-EID035601, JMM006929-JMM006931). Interoffice Memo from Penny C. Mahoney to distribution list re: concerns with wells at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID010895-EID010896, CF001143CF001144). Kemron TCLP and EP Tox metals preliminary results for one incinerator bag ash sample collected 10/10/90. WO# N0-10-146. (Bates No. EID035225-EID03 5231, CF002011-CF002017). A11 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 96 of 326 PAGEID #: 40258 \ TRILLIUM 10/17/1990 10/17/1990 10/18/1990 10/30/1990 11/2/1990 11/5/1990 11/15/1990 11/26/1990 11/29/1990 1/9/1991 1/11/1991 1/11/1991 Kemron report of TCLP and EP Tox. metals results for one sample. (Bates No. EID012529-EID012531, JMM006178-JMM006180). Kemron report of TCLP and EP Tox. metals results for one sample. [Same as document listed above] (Bates No. EID012550-EID012552, JMM006199-JMM006201). Kemron TCLP and EP Tox. metals results for one sample. (Bates No. EID012543-EID012548, JMM006192-JMM006197). Results for MW-6, MW-12, and MW-13 for samples collected 5/22/90, 8/7/90, and 10/23/90. (Bates No. EID036164-EID036156, GW006342GW006343). Letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy re: metals results appear to make fly ash a hazardous waste. [Only Attachment 4 included] (Bates No. EID051657-EID051660, CF002018-CF002021). Kemron TCLP metals results for eight samples collected 8/6/90. WO# N0-10-181. (Bates No. EID035990-EID036000, JMM005595JMM005604). PSI TCLP metals results for one incinerator ash sample. (Bates No. EID012542, JMM006191). Kemron TCLP metals results for four samples received 10/29/90. WO# N0-10-382. (Bates No. EID036045-EID036052, JMM005649JMM005656). Interoffice memo from P.C. Mahoney to distribution re: notice of violation for the DNR 10/22/90 audit. (Bates No. EID012555EID012556, JRM000766-JMM000767). Letter from Charles A. Moses to Jon Hundertmark (USEPA). re: report of permit compliance sampling inspection conducted on 8/7/90. (Bates No. CA 232-CA 238). Letter from Thomas R. Copeland (Enseco) to Penny Mahoney (DuPont) re: volatiles results (624 and DAI). for one sample collected 12/27/90. [Includes results and COC] (Bates No. EID039559-EID039577, RLR002092-RLR002110). Letter from Thomas R. Copeland (Enseco) to Penny Mahoney (DuPont) re: volatiles results (624 and DAI). for one sample collected 12/27/90. A12 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 97 of 326 PAGEID #: 40259 1/16/1991 1/31/1991 2/1/1991 2/1/1991 2/4/1991 3/12/1991 3/15/1991 3/21/1991 4/2/1991 4/19/1991 4/19/1991 \ TRILLIUM [Same as above document. Includes results and COC] (Bates No. EID035236-EID03 5254, GW000121-GW000139). Letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to Walter M. Stewart re: Draft Order Number 2904 in response to permit non-compliance. (Bates No. EID051830-EID051833, JRM000714-JRM000717). Washington Works, 1990 Annual Landfill Report. Permits WV0076244, WV0076538, WV1176066. (Bates No. EID037225-EID053433, JMM007365-JMM007478, GW002713-GW002716). Kemron TCLP metals results for bio pond sludge collected 1/14/91. (Bates No. EID035623-EID035625, JMM006953-JMM006955). Kemron TCLP metals results for bio pond sludge collected 1/14/91. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035595-EID035598, JMM006925-JMM006928). Letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy re: meeting on 2/15/91 to discuss Draft Order 2904. [Includes letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to Walter M. Stewart dated 1/16/91 re: Draft Order Number 2904 in response to permit non-compliance.] (Bates No. EID051814-EID051819, CF002703-CF002708). Notice of Appeal, DuPont (appellant) v. L. Eli McCoy, Water Resources (appellee) (Bates No. WVDEP 0154-WVDEP 0157). Memo from P.C. Mahoney to C.F. Muska re: groundwater flow rate and direction. Includes maps indicating flow in bedrock and overburden aquifers. (Bates No. EID018026-EID018028, CF001139-CF001141). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Laidley Eli McCoy re: written confirmation of cover placed on cells after cessation of the fly ash disposal. (Bates No. EID010782-EID010784, CF002645-CF002647). Kemron metals results for one Tote Bin Wash Water collected 3/21/91. WO# N1-03-217. Includes memo from G. Woytowich to J.L. Marlow re: source of heavy metals. (Bates No. EID036059-EID036060, JMM005663-JMM005664). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Laidley Eli McCoy re: request for permission to run biopond sludge/flyash test. [Includes Attachment 1 and 2.] (Bates No. EID051574-EID051598, RAK006011-RAK006035). Kemron TCLP metals results for one Oberlin filter cake collected 4/11/91. A13 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 98 of 326 PAGEID #: 40260 4/19/1991 4/22/1991 4/22/1991 4/22/1991 5/20/1991 5/30/1991 7/22/1991 7/29/1991 9/20/1991 9/20/1991 10/3/1991 10/25/1991 \ TRILLIUM WO# N1-04-227. (Bates No. EID036061-EID036063, JMM005665JMM005667). Kemron TCLP metals results for one Oberlin filter cake collected 4/11/91. WO# N1-04-227. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID036055EID036057, JMM005659-JMM005661). Kemron results for one fly ash collected 4/5/91. WO# N1-04-137. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035256-EID035263, JMM004043JMM004046). Kemron results for one fly ash collected 4/8/91. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID034894-EID034901, RAK006036-RAK006043). Kemron results for one bio pond/fly ash collected 4/8/91. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035607-EID035614, JMM006937-JMM006944). Kemron results for one fly ash and bio pond mixture collected 4/22/91. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035644-EID035662, JMM006974JMM006992). Fax from G.L. Kreil (Consolidation Coal Company) to R. Nefta (DuPont) re comprehensive analysis of the equity of coals delivered to Washington Works. (Bates No. EID035101-EID035103, JMM0005734JMM005736). Kemron results for one bio pond sludge collected 7/1/91. (Bates No. EID035591-EID035594, JMM006921-JMM006924). Kemron TCLP results for one Rags A&B sample collected 7/11/91. WO# N1-07-165. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035115-EID035135, JMM005748-JMM005768). Temporary Operating Instructions. (Bates No. EID024267-EID024285, JIG000309-JIG000327). Letter from David L. Yaussy to Walter M. Stewart re: Appeal No. 427 was dismissed. [Includes copy of Appeal] (Bates No. EID051778EID051780, JMM003849-JMM003 851). Letter from David L. Yaussy to Walter M. Stewart re: conditions appealed to Water Resources Board and resolution to each. (Bates No. EID051773-EID051777, CF002635-CF002639). Memo from W.M. Stewart to H.D. Ramsey re: appeal was settled and A14 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 99 of 326 PAGEID #: 40261 11/18/1991 1/21/1992 3/2/1992 3/27/1992 4/15/1992 5/8/1992 5/8/1992 6/5/1992 6/10/1992 6/24/1992 7/15/1992 \ TRILLIUM dismissed. [Includes letter from David L. Yaussy to Walter M. Stewart dated 10/3/91 re: conditions appealed to Water Resources Board and resolution to each. (Bates No. EID051772-EID051777, CF002634CF002639). Memo from R J Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 InterLaboratory Meeting and includes 8/31/92 CH2M Hill Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Soil/Sediment (Bates No. EID256133-EID256162). Kemron metals results for bio pond sludge collected 1/06/92. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035585-EID035590, JMM006915-JMM006920). C-8 results for 14 site samples collected 2/18/92. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Wanda L. Hall (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071327-EID071352, AC002920-AC002945). Email from Helen Wright to Robert Ritchey re: Communications with Regulatory Agencies disclosing FC-143. (Bates No. EID009472EID009474, RLR002052-RLR002054). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter, 1992. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022696-EID022706, JMM006648-JMM006658). Standard Laboratories, Inc. TCLP metals results for 14 ash samples collected 4/22-24/92. (Bates No. EID035085-EID035098, JMM005718JMM005731). Standard Laboratories, Inc. TCLP metals results for 14 ash samples collected 4/22-24/92. (Bates No. EID035166-EID035179, JMM005799JMM005812). Kemron TCLP results for one Tank sludge sample collected 5/15/92. WO#N2-05-268. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036064-EID036082, JMM005668-JMM005686). Handwritten results for % volatiles for EQ Tank Sludge Off Bottom Off Tank. (Bates No. EID036083, JMM005687). C-8 results for two site samples collected 6/12/92. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Wanda L. Hall (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071314-EID071326, AC002907-AC002919). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit A15 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 100 of 326 PAGEID #: 40262 ^ 8/25/1992 8/25/1992 9/15/1992 10/15/1992 12/17/1992 1/15/1993 1/29/1993 2/5/1993 2/16/1993 2/16/1993 2/24/1993 \ TRILLIUM,, WV0076244, Second Quarter, 1992. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022707-EID022717, JMM006637-JMM006647). Tabulated metals results for bottom ash and fly ash collected 4/23-24/92. (Bates No. EID030509-EID030510, JMM005818-JMM005819). Tire Derived Fuel and Coal Experimental Burn, Leachate test results of Bottom and Fly Ash samples for samples collected 4/23-23/92, metals results. (Bates No. EID035058-EID035059). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Eli McCoy re: original asbestos disposal area filled and new area selected and put into use. (Bates No. EID010813-EID010815, CF002612-CF002614). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter, 1992. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022718-EID022727, JMM006628-JMM006636). Analytical results for fly ash and bottom ash sampled collected 10/2730/92. (Bates No. EID030511-EID030514, JMM005820-JMM005823). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter, 1992. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022728-EID022738, JMM006616-JMM006626). Washington Works, 1992 Annual Landfill Report. Permits WV0076244, WV0076538, WV1176066. (Bates No. EID037342-EID037381, JMM007488-JMM07523). Interoffice memo from Ross S. Hefta to distribution list re: changes in coal to CONSOL blend may be contributing to the increased pH levels. (Bates No. EID017105, CF001025). Kemron TCLP metals results for bio pond sludge collected 1/25/93. (Bates No. EID035580-EID035584, JMM006910-JMM006914). Kemron TCLP metals results for bio pond sludge collected 1/25/93. (Bates No. EID035617-EID035620, JMM006947-JMM006950). Hand written tables of select metals results in bottom ash, fly ash, biosludge, and supernate from biosludge. (Bates No. EID034877EID034878, RAK006173-RAK006174). A16 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 101 of 326 PAGEID #: 40263 2/24/1993 3/26/1993 4/15/1993 4/30/1993 5/28/1993 5/28/1993 5/28/1993 5/28/1993 6/2/1993 6/3/1993 6/11/1993 7/8/1993 Hand written tables of select metals results in bottom ash, fly ash, biosludge, and supernate from biosludge. (Bates No. EID035074EID035075). Interoffice memo from George Waytowich to Thomas R. Waldron re: using ash as a cover material at the Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID010897, CF001024). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter, 1993. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022739-EID022748, JMM006606-JMM006615). C-8 results for 12 site samples collected 4/15-16/93. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Wanda L. Hall (QAL Labs). to Dan Weber (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071291-EID071313, AC002884-AC002906). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond sludge collected 5/10/93. (Bates No. EID035578-EID035579, JMM006908-JMM006909). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond sludge collected 5/10/93. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035559-EID035560, JMM006889JMM006890). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond sludge collected 5/10/93. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035557-EID035558, JMM003714JMM003715). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond sludge collected 5/10/93. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID035621-EID035622, JMM006951JMM006952). Density, pH, and % moisture results for one fly ash sample collected 6/2/93. (Bates No. EID030516, JMM005824). Power House Consol Coal Flyash/Bottom Ash Constituents. [Tabulated results] (Bates No. EID030507, JMM005816). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Dr. L. Eli McCoy (WVDEP) re: updates estimates of the amount of each type of waste disposed in Dry Run Lanfill. [Includes table of major constituents.] (Bates No. EID015296-EID015297, GW004414-GW004415). Letter from John G. Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart (DuPont) re: A17 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 102 of 326 PAGEID #: 40264 7/8/1993 7/12/1993 7/14/1993 7/16/1993 7/22/1993 7/22/1993 7/22/1993 7/28/1993 7/30/1993 8/4/1993 excessive sediment in lower sedimentation pond, upper sedimentation pond not being operated in compliance due to excessive sediment accumulation, and discharge from the lower pond is causing discoloration of the receiving stream. (Bates No. EID012563-EID012564, JMM003331-JMM003332). Interoffice memo from Geroge Woytowich to Thomas R. Waldron re: cleaning out the sedimentation pond. [Includes procedure]. (Bates No. EID017106-EID017106, JMM003346-JMM003347). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter, 1993. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022749-EID022758, JMM006596-JMM006604). Interoffice Memo from Eduardo G. Ramos to distribution re: special samples required at landfill as a result of the visit from WVDEP personnel on 6/28/93. (Bates No. EID017112-EID017n3, RAK003509RAK003510). Washington Works State Required Water Sample Quarterly Dry Run Samples. (Bates No. EID036088-EID036096, GW006429-GW006448). Kemron preliminary results for one Dry Run 001 Outlet sample collected 7/15/93. WO# N3-07-251. (Bates No. EID036107-EID036109, CF001010-CF001012). Kemron results for one Dry Run 001 Outlet sample collected 7/15/93. WO# N3-07-251. [Includes COC]. (Bates No. EID036105-EID036106, EID036087, CF001013-CF001014, GW006473). Kemron results for one Dry Run 001 Outlet sample collected 7/15/93. WO# N3-07-251. [Includes COC]. (Bates No. EID036101-EID036104, EID036110-EID036115, CF002571-CF002573, GW006475, GW006487). Kemron cover sheet for sample results. WO# N3-07-134. No results attached. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036085-EID036086, GW006497-GW006498). Kemron metals results for eight water samples collected 7/16/93. WO# N3-07-282. (Bates No. EID036116-EID036122, GW006430- GW006436). Letter form W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Dr. L. Eli McCoy re: response to A18 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 103 of 326 PAGEID #: 40265 8/5/1993 8/5/1993 8/5/1993 8/12/1993 8/26/1993 9/9/1993 9/30/1993 9/30/1993 10/8/1993 10/11/1993 10/11/1993 10/13/1993 report of agency's field review conducted 6/28/93. (Bates No. EID012567-EID012574, RAK003424-RAK003431). Interoffice memo from Eduardo G. Ramos to distribution re: Dry Run Pond Drainage observations by Cindy Musser. (Bates No. EID010898, RAK003496). Calculation of Dry Run Sedimentation (J. Ramos) (Bates No. EID036123-EID036126, GW006476-GW006779). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to Thomas R. Waldron re: open discharge value all the way. (Bates No. EID017129, RAK003482). Kemron cover sheet for sample results. WO# N3-08-004. No results attached. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036127-EID036128, GW006492-GW006493). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Dr. L. Eli McCoy (WVDEP) cleaning of the sedimentation pond at Dry Run was completed on 8/20. (Bates No. EID010816-EID010819, CF002575-CF002578). Notes on conversation with Dr. Parker discussing possible algae control at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID017146, RAK003485). Kemron results for one Dry Run Pond sample collected 9/20/93. WO# N3-09-361. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036129-EID036133, RAK003419-RAK003423). Kemron results for one Dry Run Pond sample collected 9/20/93. WO# N3-09-361. [Includes COC] (Bates No. EID036134-EID036138, JMM003128-JMM003132). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Dr. L. Eli McCoy re: maximum daily TSS permit limit and schedule for performing and submitting bioassay. (Bates No. EID051712-EID051714, CF002568-CF002570). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirsahner, Jr. to distribution re: sampling of Dry Run pond for nutrient content. (Bates No. EID030457EID030458, RAK003411-RAK003412). Interoffice memo from Carl F. Muska to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: questions concerning nutrient testing and results. (Bates No. EID017188, RAK003414). Kemron cover sheet for results for two samples. WO# N3-10-013. [No A19 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 104 of 326 PAGEID #: 40266 ^ 10/14/1993 10/14/1993 10/15/1993 10/18/1993 10/26/1993 10/27/1993 10/29/1993 11/10/1993 11/10/1993 11/11/1993 11/11/1993 11/15/1993 \ TRILLIUM,, COC]. (Bates No. EID036139-EID036140, GW006505-GW006506). Letter from John G. Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart (DuPont) re: request to delay acute toxicity testing is granted. (Bates No. EID010822, CF002565). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Dr. L. Eli McCoy (WVDEP) re: acceptable to dispose of 50/50 mixture of sludge and sawdust/woodchips in landfill. (Bates No. EID010821, GW006844). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter, 1993. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022759-EID022769, JMM006585-JMM006595). Hand written results sheet for pH, DO, and temp. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036141-EID036144, RAK003404, GW006542-GW006544). Interoffice memo from George Woytowich to distribution re: "fludging" at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID010825, CF001007). Kemron results for one Dry Run Pond sample collected 10/18/93. WO# N3-10-300. (Bates No. EID036145-EID036149, RAK003399RAK003403). Letter from Emily Williams (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont) re: acknowledgement of sample set (Lab No. 25939). [Includes COC] (Bates No. EID036150-EID036151, GW006507-GW006508). C-8 results for six site samples collected 10/22/93. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Wanda L. Hall (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071250-EID071271, AC002842-AC002863). C-8 results for six site samples collected 10/21-22/93. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Wanda L. Hall (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071272-EID071290, AC002864-AC002883). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to Bharat O. Desai re: results of nutrient analysis. (Bates No. EID030471, RAK003397). Interoffice memo from Bharat O. Desai to Richard Kirschner re: nutrient levels are OK. [Includes memo 11/11/93 from above.] (Bates No. EID030472, RAK003398). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to George Woytowich re: A20 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 105 of 326 PAGEID #: 40267 ^ 11/22/1993 12/6/1993 12/8/1993 12/08-10/93 12/20/1993 12/20/1993 12/29/1993 1994 1/14/1994 1/26/1994 1/28/1994 \ TRILLIUM,, Dry Run Pond Nutrients and bioassay set for late November/early December. [Includes two memo dated 11/11/93 from above.] (Bates No. EID030470, RAK003396). Kemron results cover sheet for two water samples. WO# N3-11-175. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036152-EID036153). Hand written results for pH for Dry Run Pond sample. (Bates No. EID036180, RAK003386). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to distribution list re: high nutrient levels. [Includes tabulated data.] (Bates No. EID030473EID030474, CF000994-CF000995). AH&M Environmental, Inc. Bioassay report. (Bates No. WVDEP 0290WVDEP 0319). Kemron results for one Dry Run Pond sample collected 12/6/93. WO# N3-12-106. (Bates No. EID036184-EID036188, RAK003376RAK003380). AH&M Environmental bioassay laboratory bench sheets. (Bates No. EID036189-EID036192, RAK003382-RAK003385). Letter from Eric Gillespie (AH&M Environmental). to Jim Yoak (DuPont) re: delayed bioassay reports. (Bates No. EID036193, CF000962). Dry Run Landfill Fluoride Data attached to one page of article entitled "Groundwater Resources of the Ohio River Valley in WV". (Bates No. EID018024-EID018025, LKI000592-LKI000593). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter, 1993. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to L. Eli McCoy. (Bates No. EID022770-EID022788, CF003241-CF003259). Kemron results for Outlet 001 sample received 12/21/93. WO# N3-12456. (Bates No. IED036176, EID036178-EID036179, GW001913, RAK003387). Washington Works, 1993 Annual Landfill Report. Permits WV0076244, WV0076538, WV1176066. (Bates No. EID037382-EID037463, JMM007524-JMM007604). A21 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 106 of 326 PAGEID #: 40268 2/4/1994 2/11/1994 3/4/1994 3/17/1994 4/14/1994 4/14/1994 4/18/1994 5/6/1994 5/25/1994 5/25/1994 6/9/1994 Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, January 2000. (Bates No. EID023934-EID023942, JMM004525-JMM004533). Kemron results for four samples collected 1/31/94. WO# N4-01-362. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035m-EID035114, JMM005746JMM005747). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 2000. (Bates No. EID023943-EID023952, JMM004508-JMM004517). C-8 results for 11 site samples collected 2/21-22/94. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Wanda L. Hall (QAL Labs) to George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071228-EID071249, AC002820-AC002841). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, March 1994 (Bates No. EID023953-EID023962, JMM004483-JMM004492). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1994. (Bates No. EID022789-EID022799, JMM004644-JMM004656). Kemron TCLP VOA results for one Fire Pit sample collected 3/29/94. WO# N4-03-608. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035158-EID035162, JMM005791-JMM005795). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, April 1994 (Bates No. EID023963-EID023972, JMM004458-JMM004467). Interoffice memo from John Britvec (WVDEP) to file re: field review of Dry Run Landfill and Local Landfills performed by John Britvec and Cindy Musser (WVDEP) performed on 5/16/94. (Bates No. EID012611EID012619, GW004785-GW004793). Interoffice memo from John Britvec (WVDEP) to file re: field review of Dry Run Landfill and Local Landfills performed by John Britvec and Cindy Musser (WVDEP) performed on 5/16/94. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070210-EID070218, LKI001692- LKI001700). Letter from Deborah Hill (Kemron) to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: formaldehyde analysis of 001 outlet missed holding time. (Bates No. A22 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 107 of 326 PAGEID #: 40269 6/15/1994 7/8/1994 7/14/1994 7/14/1994 8/12/1994 8/16/1994 8/18/1994 9/9/1994 9/12/1994 9/14/1994 10/5/1994 EID030482, GW006403). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, May 1994 (Bates No. EID023973-EID023979, JMM004437-JMM004443). Renewal application for WV Solids Waste/NPDES permit. [Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Mark A. Scott (WVDEP)]. (Bates No. EID053308-EID53772, GW002549-GW003053). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter 1994. (Bates No. EID022800-EID022811, JMM004617-JMM004628). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, June 1994. (Bates No. EID023980-EID023989, JMM004420-JMM004429). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, July 1994(Bates No. EID023990-EID023999, JMM004403JMM004412). Consol, Inc. Coal Quality Statistical Evaluation of metals results. (Bates No. EID035099, JMM005732). C-8 results for 11 site samples collected 7/29/94 and 8/1/94. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Angel Kionka (QAL Labs) to George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071208-EID071227, AC002800AC002819). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Mark A. Scott re: information to complete permit application submitted 7/8/94. [Includes revisions.] (Bates No. EID020862-EID020877, CF000545-CF000562). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, August 1994. (Bates No. EID024000-EID024009, JMM004386-JMM004395). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Mark A. Scott (WVDEP) re: filter press used to dewater sludge. Enclosed revised list of major constituents going to landfill. (Bates No. EID010828-EID010830, JMM003658JMM003660). Kemron TCLP metals results for bio pond press filter cake received 9/19/94. (Bates No. EID035574-EID035577, JMM006904-JMM006907). A23 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 108 of 326 PAGEID #: 40270 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 10/10/1994 10/14/1994 10/17/1994 10/17/1994 11/10/1994 11/28/1994 12/14/1994 01/95-07/95 1/6/1995 1/10/1995 1/13/1995 1/30/1995 2/14/1995 Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, September 1994. (Bates No. EID02010-EID024019, JMM004366-JMM004375). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter 1994. (Bates No. EID022812-EID022824). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond press filter cake received 10/10/94. (Bates No. EID035569-EID035573, JMM006899-JMM006903). Kemron TCLP VOA results for Kiln Ash sample collected 9/29/94. WO# N4-10-034. (Bates No. EID035062-EID035067, JMM005695JMM005700). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1994. (Bates No. EID024020-EID024029, JMM004349-JMM004358). Interoffice Memo from Ross S. Hefta to Daniel A. Weber re: tabulated results for flyash. (Bates No. EID030506, JMM005815). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, November 1994 (Bates No. EID024030-EID024039, JMM004332-JMM004341). Report of Investigation. (Bates No. EID070219-EID070231). Letter from Terry Hofmann to Hopewell Water Project Residents re: completion of attached survey. (Bates No. EID070233-EID070234, LKI001716-LKI001717). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, December 1994. (Bates No. EID024040-EID024041.10, JMM004312-JMM004323). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1994. (Bates No. EID022825-EID022842). Washington Works, 1994 Annual Landfill Report. Permits WV0076244, WV0076538, WV1176066. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to Mark A. Scott. (Bates No. EID037475-EID037503, JMM007124JMM007152). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit A24 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 109 of 326 PAGEID #: 40271 ^ 2/20/1995 3/1/1995 3/2/1995 3/6/1995 3/14/1995 3/15/1995 3/15/1995 3/15/1995 3/15/1995 3/16/1995 3/22/1995 \ TRILLIUM,, WV0076244, January 1995. (Bates No. EID023782-EID023792, SDB000749-SDB000759). Letter from H.D. Ramsey (DuPont) to distribution re: landfill is not contaminating water supply. (Bates No. EID013171, LKI000745). Interoffice Memo from John F. Doughty to distribution list re: black color of water is caused by iron sulfide. (Bates No. EID016749-EID01757, JMM003013-JMM003021). Interoffice Memo from Daniel A. Weber to H. David Ramsey, Jr., Walter M. Stewart, Gerald A. Ploeger, and Lynwood K. Ireland re: bis-(2ethylhexyl). phthalate summary. (Bates No. EID030517-EID030519, JMM001051 -JMM001053). Interoffice memo from H. David Ramsey, Jr. to distribution re: proposed vist by Hopewell citizens. (Bates No. EID070235, LKI001718). Interoffice Memo from John F. Doughty to Alison A. Crane re: review chemical compositions and MSDS for four materials. Can be burned in incinerator. (Bates No. EID015625, RAK006190). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 1995. (Bates No. EID023793-EID023803, SDB000730-SDB000740). Interoffice Memo from David E. Ellis to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: black water possibly caused by weight of the material in the new lifts may be compressing the old pre-sedimentation pond. (Bates No. EID016764, JMM003711). Interoffice Memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to David E. Ellis , Robert A. Reich and J. Martin Odom re: water exiting sedimentation pond was black and smelled of sulfides. In addition, experienced large amounts of foam. (Bates No. EID016758-EID016859, JMM003712-JMM03713). Interoffice Memo from J. Martin Odom to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: Sulf Control used for suppressing sulfide emissions from waste treatment systems. (Bates No. EID016763, JMM003712). Interoffice Memo from Ralph E. Beeman to David E. Ellis re: nitric acid used to treat the sulfide problem ex situ. (EID0168766, RAK006479). Self Control Field Test Proposal. [Includes fax transmission from Robert F. Knauer, Jr. (EBI) to Rich Kirschner (DuPont)]. (Bates No. A25 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 110 of 326 PAGEID #: 40272 3/22/1995 3/23/1995 3/23/1995 3/23/1995 3/27/1995 3/30/1995 3/30/1995 4/6/1995 4/13/1995 4/13/1995 4/16/1995 4/18/1995 4/25/1995 EID016855-EID016861, CF000911-CF000917). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to H. David Ramsey, Jr. and Gerald A. Ploeger re: points of interest concerning Hopewill-Lubeck citizens and DuPont. (Bates No. EID070236, LKI001719). WVDEP Landfill Inspection Report (Bates No. WVDEP 0694). WVDEP Landfill Inspection Report (Bates No. EID012628, CF000947). WVDEP Landfill Inspection Report (Bates No. EID070208-EID070209, LKI001690-LKI001691). Memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: introduction of chemical not currently in use -Sulf Control SC-103. (Bates No. EID016795, RAK006489). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to Ronald W. Meloon and H. David Ramsey re: draft letter to be sent to Hopewell citizens to obtain a water service for the community. (Bates No. EID070237, LKI001720). Kemron TCLP metals results for two Slag samples collected 3/27/95. WO# N5-03-482. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035081-EID035084, JMM005714-JMM5714). Interoffice memo from George Woytowich (DuPont) to distribution re: disposal of heat stabilizer in Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID015626EID015627, GW001326-GW001327). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, March 1995. (Bates No. EID023804-EID023814, SDB000711-SDB000721). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1995. (Bates No. EID022843-EID022853). Interoffice memo from Roger Duff to distribution list re: call from Mr. Tennant about a fish kill in the stream feeding off the settling pond at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID007451, CF000953). QA Lab Work Request. [Includes results for surfactants, COD, and TSS.] Bates No. CA 002-CA 003). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Ronald W. Meloon, Lynwood K Ireland, Walter M. Stewart, George Woytowich, and Thomas A26 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 111 of 326 PAGEID #: 40273 ^ 4/26/1995 5/3/1995 5/4/1995 5/8/1995 5/12/1995 5/24/1995 5/26/1995 5/26/1995 Jun-95 Jun-95 6/1/1995 \ TRILLIUM,, R. Waldron re: two geologists from DER visited site and indicated that they felt the measures taken should improve the color and flow from the landfill. (Bates No. EID016649, CF000952). Interoffice memo from D. Chris Koelsch to Gerald A. Ploeger and H. David Ramsey, Jr. re: report of foam coming from run off from farmer who owns 200 acres near the landfill. Forwarded to Water M. Stewart, George Woytowich, Lynwood Ireland, and Richard A. Kirshcner, Jr. by Gerald a. Ploeger. (Bates No. EID007456-EID007457, GW001370GW001371). WVDEP Landfill Inspection Report (Bates No. EID012627, CF000946). Report from Robert M. Crowley to D.A. Weber, statistical review of first quarter data. (Bates No. EID030532-EID030543, GW000707GW000718). Interoffice Memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to John F. Doughty, George Woytowich, Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. and Thomas R. Waldon re: return of black water. (Bates No. EID016652, RAK006451). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, April 1995. (Bates No. EID023815-EID023825, SDB000688-SDB000698). Dry Run Special Weekly Samples; tabulated TOC, COD, DO, and flow results for Outlet 001 and 1000 feet downstream. (Bates No. EID016653, RAK006448). Kemron TCLP metals results for one sample collected 5/8/95. WO# N505-152. (Bates No. EID035110, JMM005743). Kemron TCLP metals results for one sample collected 5/8/95. WO# N505-152. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID035974, JMM005578). Remove Efficiency of Leachate/Sediment Pond @ Dry Run Landfill. [Includes results for COD, BOD, TOC, T-Fe, Sulfate, TDS, TSS, Mn for three quarters] (Bates No. WVDEP 0655). Dry Run Pond "Black" water. Includes activities performed during 1994, future programs, and tabulated data for 1994 and January through May 1995. (Bates No. EID016709-EID016715, LKI000076-LKI000082). Interoffice memo from David E. Ellis to distribution re: conversation with A27 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 112 of 326 PAGEID #: 40274 6/1/1995 6/7/1995 6/9/1995 6/9/1995 6/12/1995 6/14/1995 6/15/1995 6/15/1995 6/17/1995 Jul-95 Jul-95 Prof. Perry McCarty (Stanford). re: ways to treat black water problem. (Bates No. EID016654-EID016655, LKI000122-LKI000123). Tabulated inorganic results for Outlet 001 and 1000 feet downstream samples collected January through June, 1995. (Bates No. EID016737, LKI000083). Memo from Cindy Musser (WVDEP) to Mike Zeto re: issues pertaining to the increase in COD, BOD, TOC, and sulfate, and "black water". [Attachments and photos referenced in document not included] (Bates No. WVDEP 0640-WVDEP 0647). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, May 1995. (Bates No. EID023826-EID023836, SDB000669-SDB000679). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty to distribution list re; test on Dry Run water and solids. (Bates No. EID016664-EID016666, CF000940CF000942). Kemron TCLP SVOC and VOA results for one sample received 5/24/95. WO# N5-05-474. (Bates No. EID035076-EID035080, JMM005709JMM005713). Interoffice memo from John Doughty to distribution list re: activated carbon not successful treatment for black water problem. (Bates No. EID016667, CF000943). Interoffice Memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to distribution list re: "black"' water problem still exists. Activated carbon worked for first day. [No notes included although indicated in memo to be present.] (Bates No. EID016663, CF000939). Kemron TKN results for three water samples collected 6/1/95. [Includes COC]. (Bates No. EID016670-EID016674, RAK006421-RAK006425). Interoffice memo from Ralph E. Beeman to George Woytowich re: questions concerning treatment of black water. (Bates No. EID016668EID016669, GW001368-GW001369). Report of Investigation (Bates No. EID012642-EID012656, CF000404CF000418). DMR 1995 [Tabulated results for monthly monitoring parameters] (Bates No. WVDEP 0691). A28 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 113 of 326 PAGEID #: 40275 _ ^ Tt r il l iu m , Jul-95 Jul-95 7/7/1995 7/12/1995 7/12/1995 7/14/1995 7/25/1995 8/14/1995 9/14/1995 9/25/1995 10/1995 Quarterly Leachate Analysis (Bates No. WVDEP 0690). June activities and future programs for black water problem, treatment study using activated carbon, and began 24 hr. aeration. [Includes tabulated inorganic results for Outlet 001 and 1000 feet dowmstream samples collected January through June, 1995 and Dry Run Special Weekly Samples; tabulated TOC, COD, DO and flow results for Outlet 001 and 1000 feet downstream] (Bates No. EID016726-EID016728, LKI001377-LKI001379). C-8 results for nine site samples collected 6/13/95. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Angel Kionka (QAL Labs). to George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071188-EID071207, AC002780-AC002799). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, June 1995. (Bates No. EID023837-EID023849, SDB000638-SDB000650). Report from Robert M. Crowley to George Woytowich, statistical review of second quarter data. (Bates No. EID030580-EID030590, GW000737GW000747). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter 1995. (Bates No. EID022854EID022864). Interoffice Memo from Alison A. Crane to distribution list re: aeration of upper pond has cleared appearance. (Bates No. EID016707, CF000938). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, July 1995. (Bates No. EID023850-EID023866, SDB000610-SDB626). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, August 1995. (Bates No. EID023867-EID023878, SDB000590-SDB000601). Letter from John G. Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart re: deficiencies found at field investigations on May 16, 1994 were not addressed as seen in the March 23, 1995 and May 3, 1995 investigations. (Bats No. EID012672-EID012685, LKI000830-LKI000843). Response to comments detailed in letter from WVDEP dated September 25, 1995. (Bates No. EID039514-EID039544, DAW000578- A29 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 114 of 326 PAGEID #: 40276 ^ 10/11/1995 10/12/1995 10/13/1995 10/20/1995 10/24/1995 10/26/1995 11/6/1995 11/6/1995 11/9/1995 11/17/1995 12/5/1995 \ TRILLIUM,, DAW000608). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, September 1995. (Bates No. EID023879-EID023890, SDB000570-SDB000581). Report from Robert M. Crowley to D.A. Weber, statistical review of third quarter data. (Bates No. EID030580-EID030590, GW000737GW000747). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter 1995. (Bates No. EID022865-EID022881). Treatment of Dry Run Landfill ponds from 3/13/95-10/20/95. (Bates No EID039286-EID039288, TRW001295-TRW001297). Kemron TCLP results for one soil sample collected 10/12/95. WO# N510-310. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID036001-EID036008, JMM005605-JMM005612). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to John G. Britvec (WVDEP) re: confirmation of conversation that reference permit application is incomplete. (Bates No. EID020817, GW004426). Kemron TCLP results for two railroad debris samples collected 10/17/95. WO# N5-10-457. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID03581-EID035989, JMM005585-JMM005589). Kemron TCLP results for two railroad debris samples collected 10/17/95. WO# N5-10-457. [Includes COC. Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID03549-EID035957, JMM005782-JMM005790). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1995. (Bates No. EID023891-EID023905, SDB000547-SDB000561). SOP for Leeman Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (EID067544-EID067565). Letter from John Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart re: deficiencies observed in May 1994 and March 1995 field reviews have been addressed; November 2, 1995 field review revealed some deficiencies that must be addressed. (Bates No. EID012688-EID012690, CF000383CF000385). A30 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 115 of 326 PAGEID #: 40277 12/5/1995 12/11/1995 12/12/1995 12/13/1995 12/15/1995 12/28/1995 1/5/1996 1/8/1996 1/12/1996 1/12/1996 1/16/1996 1/16/1996 ~ Vt r il l iu m Interoffice memo from Craig K. Dillon to distribution list re: meeting notes on the disposal of FC-143 at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID016730EID016731, GW000841-GW000842). Document signed by A.E. James re: non C-8 waste to be shipped to Dry Run Landfill. [Includes procedures for packaging] (Bates No. EID009068-EID009084, GW000845-GW000861). Report from Robert M. Crowley to D.A. Weber, statistical review of fourth quarter data. (Bates No. EID030591-EID030609, GW000748GW000766). Notes from Dawn Jackson documenting call from Jim Crum (DNR). re: deer Mr. Tennant found dead was near Dry Run and DuPont's treatment practices of ponds. (Bates No. EID010289, DDJ001308). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Navember 1995. (Bates No. EID023906-EID023916, SDB000824-SDB000834). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1995. (Bates No. EID022882-EID022893). Memo from Marilyn Zumbro to DuPont Sampling Personnel re: DuPont to audit Kemron's sampling during first quarter sampling effort. (Bates No. EID067536-EID067539). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, First Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID 022960-EID022969, GW000643-GW000652). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, December 1995. (Bates No. EID023917-EID023927, SDB000512-SDB000522). Revised Data Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, for August, September, and October. (Bates No. EID023928-EID023933, SDB000523-SDB000528). National Testing Laboratories Watercheck Report of B.J. Well. (Bates No. CA 001,CA 055-CA057). National Testing Laboratories Watercheck Report of Dry Run center pipe. (Bates No. CA 052-CA054). A31 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 116 of 326 PAGEID #: 40278 1/29/1996 1/29/1996 2/5/1996 2/6/1996 2/21/1996 3/6/1996 3/7/1996 3/14/1996 3/22/1996 4/2/1996 4/4/1996 4/4/1996 Washington Works, 1995 Annual Landfill Report. Permits WV0076244, WV1176066. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor. (Bates No. EID037475-EID037503, JMM007124-JMM007152). Washington Works, 1995 Annual Landfill Report. Permits WV0076244, WV1176066. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor. [Same as above w/ different Bates Nos.] (Bates No. EID037717EID037725, RAK006401-RAK006409). Letter report form Charles Anderson re: results of vegetation survey performed on August 9-10, 1995. Visible effects of air pollution at top of ridge near the Telfon facility. [Includes tables of observations] (Bates No. EID014065-EID014075, LKI000887-LKI000897). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, January 1996. (Bates No. EID023661-EID023671, SDB000491-SDB000501). Typed notes from "Dan" re: site visit by Michael Zeto, Donald Hill and Cindy Musser all from WVDEP. (Bates No. EID012694, DDJ001307). Kemron metals and TCLP metals results for one bottom ash sample collected 2/21/96. WO# N6-02-457 Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: landfill waste totals and projected years remaining on utilization. (Bates No. EID031514-EID031515, LKI000255-LKI000256). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 1995. (Bates No. EID023672-EID023681, SDB000466-SDB000475). Kemron results for paint booth filters 3/8/96. WO# N6-03-163. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035136-EID035140, JMM005769-JMM005773). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, First Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID022944-EID022959, GW000411-GW000426). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID022894-EID022906). State of WV Quarterly Leachate Analysis Report Form (EID022970EID02273, GW002185-GW002188). A32 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 117 of 326 PAGEID #: 40279 4/11/1996 4/12/1996 4/12/1996 4/12/1996 4/18/1996 4/22/1996 4/25/1996 4/30/1996 4/30/1996 5/1/1996 5/1/1996 Letter from Spencer Hamil (QAL Labs). to Dan Weber (DuPont) acknowledging sample receipt on 4/10/96. (Bates No. EID071179EID071181, AC002766-AC002768). Letter from Spencer Hamil (QAL Labs). to Dan Weber (DuPont) acknowledging sample receipt on 4/12/96. (Bates No. EID071182EID071184, AC002769-AC002771). Letter from Spencer Hamil (QAL Labs). to Dan Weber (DuPont) acknowledging sample receipt on 4/12/96. (Bates No. EID071185EID071187, AC002772-AC002774). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, March 1996. (Bates No. EID023682-EID023691, SDB000442-SDB000451). Interoffice memo from Walter M. Stewart to Daniel Weber re: aquashade OK for use in sedimentation pond. (Bates No. EID017723, DAW000468). Interoffice memo from George Woytowich to Daniel Weber and Walter M. Stewart re: error in Dry Run NPDES Permit Application. (Bates No. EID029734, JMM003562). Kemron TCLP results for bio pond press filter cake received 4/17/96. (Bates No. EID035561-EID035568, JMM006891-JMM006898). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, April 1996. (Bates No. EID023692-EID023701, SDB000424-SDB000433). C-8 results for four site samples collected 4/10/96. [Includes COC and case narrative from CH2M Hill.] (Bates No. EID071136-EID071146, AC002722-AC002732). C-8 results for three site samples collected 4/9/96. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Jennifer Boone (QAL Labs). to Dan Weber (DuPont) Laboratory sheets indicates CH2M Hill.] (Bates No. EID071164-EID071178, AC002750-AC002765). C-8 results for three site samples collected 4/10/96. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Jennifer Boone (QAL Labs). to Dan Weber (DuPont) Laboratory sheets indicates CH2M Hill.] (Bates No. EID071147-EID071163, AC002733-AC002749). A33 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 118 of 326 PAGEID #: 40280 5/1/1996 5/30/1996 6/4/1996 6/10/1996 6/18/1996 6/20/1996 6/28/1996 7/8/1996 7/10/1996 7/11/1996 8/7/1996 Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor re: revised permit application for continued operation of Dry Run Landfill. [Includes supporting documentation] (Bates No EID020749-EID021462, CF000537-CF000538, RAK001406-RAK002575). Kemron SOP for Sampling Groundwater Monitoring Wells (Bates NO. EID067515-EID067535). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, May 1996. (Bates No. EID023702-EID023711, GW005074-GW005083). Kemron TCLP results for one asphalt sample collected 5/28/96. WO# 96 05-520. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035975-EID035980, JMM005579-JMM005584). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara Taylor re: additional information for Dry Run permit renewal application. (Bates No. EID020696-EID020748, RAK001136-RAK001188). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Second Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID022974-EID022989, GW000427-GW000442). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor re: intention to land apply filter cake sludge generated from filter press at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID010831 -EID010836, CF000354-CF000359). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Water M. Stewart re: request for copy of OWR approval letter for the application of industrial sludge. (Bates No. EID070777, GW007186). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID022907EID022918). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, June 1996. (Bates No. EID023712-EID023721, SDB000387-SDB000396). Memo from R.W. Meloon to R.A. Kirschner re: Project Objectives Letter, Washington Works Power & Services, Dry Run Landfill Stormwater Diversion and Pond Modifications. (Bates No. EID070250-EID070252, LKI001733-LKI001735). A34 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 119 of 326 PAGEID #: 40281 8/13/1996 8/13/1996 8/16/1996 8/28/1996 9/10/1996 9/10/1996 9/11/1996 9/16/1996 9/24/1996 9/24/1996 9/25/1996 Oct-96 Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, July 1996. (Bates No. EID023722-EID023731, SDB000348-SDB000357). WVDEP Landfill Inspection Report (Bates No. EID012696, GW004160). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland re: efforts made to address items identified by Cindy Musser during audit. (Bates No. EID039285, TRW001294). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Brenda C. Sams re: list of materials that can be landfilled without second opinion. (Bates No. EID017773-EID017774, DAW000437-DAW00043 8). Interoffice memo from Walter M. Stewart to distribution re: complaint from Earl Tenant that 150 cattle died as a result of fluoride exposure to water from landfill. (Bates No. EID010291, LKI000126). Letter from W.N. Stewart to Cynthia J. Musser re: steps taken to address items noted in compliance inspection report. (Bates No. EID012699EID012701, GW000151-GW000153). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, August 1996. (Bates No. EID023732-EID023741, GW005045-GW005054). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Ronald W. Meloon and Lynwood K. Ireland re: observations at landfill. (Bates No. EID024378, JMM002726). Letter from Mike Zickler (Weston) to Deborah Eble re: possible conflict of interest. (Bates No. EID009470-EID009471, JMM001634JMM001635). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Third Quarter 1996. (Bates EID022990-EID023005, GW000443-GW000458). Letter from John G. Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart (DuPont) re: need for additional information in order to review permit application. (Bates No. EID020647-EID020650,LKI000632-LKI000635). Data Evaluation of fluoride, aluminum, iron, and manganese. (Bates No. EID034639, RAK004315). A35 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 120 of 326 PAGEID #: 40282 ^ 10/2/1996 10/7/1996 10/9/1996 10/15/1996 10/15/1996 10/16/1996 10/17/1996 10/22/1996 10/23/1996 10/24/1996 10/28/1996 11/1/1996 \ TRILLIUM,, Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID022919-EID022931). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Ronald W. Meloon and Lynwood K. Ireland re: foam at outfall and exposed track on the face of the active field. (Bates No. EID039381, TRW001290). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, September 1996. (Bates No. EID023742-EID023751, GW005035-GW0005044). Interoffice memo from Walter M. Stewart to distribution re: inspection of landfill to be performed as a result of Mr. Tennant's complaint. (Bates No. EID024318, JMM001782). Letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to W.M. Stewart re: intent to file civil action against DuPont due to continuous discharge and disposal violations. [Includes complaint] (Bates No. EID012733-EID012756, LKI000594-LKI000617). EPA sampling at Dry Run Landfill Summary of Split Sample Results Analyzed by Kemron Environmental Services. [Includes results for metals, formaldehyde, acetone, benzene, and di-n-butylphthalate] (Bates No. EID034874, JMM001722). Interoffice Memo from Edward J. Lutz to 9 addresses re: technical arguments in defense of Dry Run conceptual design. (Bates No. EID017801-EID017803, DAW000430-DAW000432). State of WV Quarterly Well Report Form (Bates No. EID023006EID023020, SDB000039-SDB000053). TIC summary forms for water samples received 10/18/96. (Bates No. EID034830-EID034834, JMM001480-JMM001483). Kemron Organic QA/QC (Bates No. EID034835-EID034846, JMM001409-JMM001420). Kemron Inorganic QA/QC (Bates No. EID034808-EID034829, JMM001387-JMM001408). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland and Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: exposed trash and truck unloading in the asbestos disposal area. (Bates No. EID039260, TRW001269). A36 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 121 of 326 PAGEID #: 40283 ^ 11/4/1996 11/4/1996 11/7/1996 11/8/1996 11/11/1996 11/12/1996 11/13/1996 11/14/1996 11/18/1996 11/20/1996 \ TRILLIUM,, Letter from W.M. Stewart to Ron Levine (Northwestern Disposal Sanitary Landfill) re: would like to begin disposing of 330 tons per month of non hazardous filter cake. [Includes Solid Waste Profile form]. (Bates No. EID010872-EID010785, RAK007630-RAK007643). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Sharon S. Adams re: biopond filtercake shipments to Northwestern Landfill on Rt. 50. (Bates No. EID010886, RAK007625). Letter from Richard P. Cooke (EPA). to Ronald Levine (Northern Disposal, Co.). re: approval granted to dispose of filter cake. (Bates No. EID010888, RAK007623). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara S. Taylor (WVDEP) re: plans to collect leachate generated at Dry Run Landfill and transport it to Washington Works for treatment. (Bates No. EID010842-EID010864, RAK007672-RAK007676). Talking Points-For Use Only Upon Media Inquiry. [Includes draft dated 11/8/96 and memo from Gerald Ploeger to Walter Stewart, Daniel Weber, and Dawn Jackson requesting review.] (Bates No. EID017805EID017807, DAW000411-DAW000413). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara S. Taylor (EPA). re: request modification to permit to treat leachate from Dry Run in the wastewater treatment plant. (Bates No. EID021472-EID021516, LKI000465-LKI000508). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1996. (Bates No. EID023752-EID023761, SDB000283-SDB000292). Kemron results for samples collected 10/16/96. [Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara Taylor (WVDEP) (Bates No. EID012759- EID012811, JMM001674-JMM001721). Kemron TCLP metals results for one solid waste collected 10/24/96. Login # 96-11-040. (Bates No. EID035972-EID035973, JMM005576JMM005577). Letter from John Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart (DuPont) re: requests 1 foot clay berm be installed around the entire perimeter of the leachate holding tank. (Bates No. EID031608-EID031609, HDR000754HDR000755). A37 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 122 of 326 PAGEID #: 40284 ^ 11/20/1996 11/20/1996 11/25/1996 12/2/1996 12/3/1996 12/3/1996 12/4/1996 12/4/1996 12/4/1996 12/12/1996 12/12/1996 \ TRILLIUM,, Lubeck PSD Findings for EPA's Inquiry. [Includes cover letter from David P Watkins (WVDEP) to Sarah Caspar (EPA Region In).]. (Bates No. EID012815-EID012823, JMM001637-JMM001645). Minutes of ECC Meeting. (Bates No. EID070290, GW007088). Letter from Richard P. Cooke (EPA). to Ronald Levine (Northern Disposal, Co.) Re: approval granted to dispose of increased volume of filter cake. (Bates No. EID010894, RAK007613). Letter from W. M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara Taylor (WVDEP) re: proposed revision to the system which will be used to collect leachate generated at the Dry Run Landfill and transport it to Washington Works for treatment. (Bates No. EID010849-EID010860, CF000316CF000327). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, November 1996. (Bates No. EID023762-EID023771, GW005016-GW005024). Letter (unsigned). from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara S. Taylor (WVDEP) re: additional information concerning operation of the holding tank pump used in the Dry Run Landfill leachate collection system. [Same as signed letter dated 12/4/96] (Bates No. EID017708-EID017710, DAW000407-DAW000409). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara S. Taylor (WVDEP) re: additional information concerning operation of the holding tank pump used in the Dry Run Landfill leachate collection system. [Same as unsigned letter dated 12/3/96] (Bates No. EID010862, RAK007656). Letter from John Britvec (WVDEP) to W. M. Stewart (DuPont) re: revised interim system appears to be acceptable. (Bates No. EID010863EID010864, CF000305-CF000306). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Fourth Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID023021-EID023040, GW0000459-GW000478). Letter from Barbara S. Taylor to Walt M. Stewart re: modification to WV/NPDES permit. Revised pages enclosed. (Bates No. EID021464EID021471, HDR000673-HDR000680). Consent Decree, Circuit Court of Wood County, WV; Laidley Eli McCoy, Director WV Division of Environmental Protection, Plaintiff v. E.I. A38 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 123 of 326 PAGEID #: 40285 ^ 12/13/1996 12/19/1996 12/19/1996 12/19/1996 12/20/1996 12/20/1996 12/23/1996 12/30/1996 12/31/1996 12/31/1996 1997 \ TRILLIUM,, DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (Bates No. EID029970-EID029985, RLR001485-RLR001500). Field Trip Report Preliminary Assessment for Dry Run/N. Fork Lee Creek Bovine Site, by PRC Environmental Mgmt for USEPA Region 3 (Bates No. USFW 0157-USFW 0350). Interoffice memo from Hayden Lancaster to Waldrotr re: rejected load and itemization of various Teflons to be disposed. (Bates No. EID031616-EID031617, CF000806-CF000807). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Alison A. Crane, Richard A. Kirschner, Jr., and Daniel A. Weber re: able to dispose of pelletized stuff in Dry Run but have no idea where powders and raw materials will end up. (Bates No. EID 031615, CF00805). Interoffice memo from Hayden Lancaster to Thomas R. Waldron re: disposal of material. (Bates No. EID039248-EID039249, TRW001240TRW001241). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution list re: teflon/tefzel/halar wates OK for Dry Run providing they are extruded material. Hold on calcium tetraborate. (Bates No. EID031614, CF000804). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Hayden E. Lancaster re: returned shipment. (Bates No. EID031618, JMM004019). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor re; submission of additional information to supplement Dry Run Landfill permit renewal application. (Bates No. EID020596-EID020641, RAK001035RAK001080). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to Leonard W. Hall re: Dry Run Landfill project update. (Bates No. EID070239-EID070246, LKI001722-LKI001729). Fax from Matthew Crown to David Ramsey re: requesting signature to Order Issued Under the Water Pollution Control Act. Includes hand written note also dated 12/31/96. (Bates No. EID024188-EID024189, HDR000661-HDR000662). Signed Order Issued Under the Water Pollution Control Act. Dry Run Landfill Task Team Anticipated Questions. (Bates No. A39 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 124 of 326 PAGEID #: 40286 1997 1/2/1997 1/3/1997 1/6/1997 1/6/1997 1/6/1997 1/7/1997 1/13/1997 1/19/1998 1/19/1998 1/20/1997 2/7/1997 EID029797-EID029801, LKI001047-LKI001047). Hand written notes of Tennant farm Review of video tape. (Bates No. EID067268-EID067271, GPS000561-GPS000564). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1996. (Bates No. EID022932-EID022943). Interoffice Memo from Ronald Meloon to distribution list re: first load of leachate from Dry Run back to the new dewatering facility. (Bates No. EID029946, CF000801). Appendix E-Support Documentation. Narrative and QC data for soil and water samples collected 10/96. Analysis performed by AATSLA. Also includes COC and copies of sample tags. (Bates No. EID034848EID034864, JMM001493-JMM001509). Appendix D CADRE Qualification Reports (Bates No. EID034865EID034873, JMM001484-JMM001492). Kemron TCLP metals results for one Monomer Stillhouse sample collected 12/31/96. Login # 97-01-009. [Includes COC.] (Bates No. EID035967-EID035971, JMM005571-JMM005575). Inorganic Data Validation (IM2 Level) prepared by Lockheed Martin. [Includes transmittal memo from Cynthia E. Caporale to Sarah Caspar] (Bates No. USEPA 0400-USEPA 0454). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, December 1996. (Bates No. EID023772-EID023781, GW005005-GW005014). Memo from Andrew Hartten to Dan Weber re: Comments on EPA's Dry Run Landfill Summary Report Geology and Hydrogeology Related Issues. (Bates No. EID067091-EID067096, RAK004335-RAK004340). Table of results from memo from Andrew Hartten to Dan Weber re: Comments on EPA's Dry Run Landfill Summary Report Geology and Hydrogeology Related Issues. (Bates No. EID067091-EID067096, RAK004335-RAK004340). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: monitoring well maintenance/issue list. (Bates No. EID024361). Kemron TCLP results for six samples collected 1/17/97. Login # 97-01- A40 02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 125 of 326 PAGEID #: 40287 1/22/1997 1/23/1997 1/24/1997 1/27/1997 1/27/1997 1/29/1997 1/30/1997 1/30/1997 1/31/1997 1/31/1997 2/3/1997 2/7/1997 459. (Bates No. EID036009-EID036029). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to D. Lew Westermeyer re: 30 boxed of material to landfill at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID039928, TRW000388). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Hayden E. Lancaster re: disposition of material to landfill. (Bates No. EID039247, TRW001239). NPDES Incident Summary (EID029936, RLR001326). Interoffice memo from Alison A. Crane to Daniel A. Weber re: request to landfill melamine cyanurate and elvamide. (Bates No. EID031838). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara Taylor re: signed copy of Order Number 3850 for settlement of findings resulting from inspections conducted at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID024243-EID024248, DDJ000065DDJ000070). Interoffice memo from Harley D. Bickerstaff to Ronald W. Meloon & Lynwood K. Ireland re: pH, TSS, and T-Fe results for sample taken from Outlet 001. (Bates No. EID039240, TRW001220). Washington Works, 1996 Annual Landfill Report. Permit WV0076244. Includes cover letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor. (Bates No. EID037734-EID037743, RAK006382-RAK006391). Hand drawn map of existing leachate collection system, upper pond, lower pond, and Outlet 001. (Bates No. EID029921, GW004751). Table of TSS and total iron results for Outlet 001 and Outlet 002. (Bates No. EID011553, RAK000264). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty to 5 addressees re: iron and manganese in water samples from landfill. Memo forwarded to Thomas R. Waldron and Alison A. Crane from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. (Bates No. EID039242-EID039243, TRW001224-TRW001225). State of WV Quarterly Well Report Form. Includes Groundwater Sampling Field Data Sheets (Bates No. EID023116-EID023013, GW000393-GW000403, SDB00105-SDB001059). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to 5 addressees re: iron content in Outlet 001 sample. (Bates No. EID039239, TRW001219). A41 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 126 of 326 PAGEID #: 40288 2/11/1997 2/13/1997 2/14/1997 2/16/1997 2/19/1997 2/19/1997 2/20/1997 2/21/1997 2/27/1997 2/27/1997 2/27/1997 3/3/1997 Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, January 1997. (Bates No. EID023538-EID023546, SDB000982-SDB000990). Letter from Dennis P. Carney (EPA Region III) to Walt Stewart (DuPont) re: seeking information concerning a release at Dry Run Landfill. [Includes Interoffice memo from W.M. Stewart to H.D. Ramsey.] (Bates No. EID009021-EID009029, RAK003232-RAK003240). Interoffice Memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to distribution list re: investigation meeting to discuss iron exceedances. (Bates No. EID029916, HDR000477). Email from Carl Berryman to Alloyra A. Marrs re: Mr. Tennant's cattle deaths. (Bates No. EID010297, JMM000996). MSDS for FC-118. [Includes fax form from Les Eng to Dr. William Edwards. (Bates No. EID008492-EID008498, GW001400-GW001406). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to distribution list re: elevated iron levels in landfill. (Bates No. EID011551-EID011553, RAK000262-RAK000263). Incident Report (Washington Works)., monthly average for iron exceeded NPDES permit limit. (Bates No. EID024385-EID024387, JRM000282JRM000284). Washington Works Dry Run Landfill Additional Information. (Bates No. EID020434-EID020571, RAK000859-RAK000996). Interoffice Memo from Daniel A. Weber to Alison A. Crane re: disposal of creosoted wood. (Bates No. EID031849, GW000839). Letter from Charles A. Moses (Div. Environmental Protection). to Anthony Meadows (NPDES/EPA). re: report of groundwater sampling performed 1/14-16/97. Includes tabulated analytical results (Bates No. EID046428-EID046438, RAK007425-RAK007435). Letter from Jack Cotrell to Todd Carden (Public Service Commission of WV) re: object to permit being issued to Boso Equipment. (Bates No. EID020432, DDJ000387). Interoffice memo from Daniel Weber to Walter M. Stewart re: disposal of deer bones at Dry Run Landfill approved by WVDEP. (Bates No. EID031850, JMM001815). A42 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 127 of 326 PAGEID #: 40289 3/6/1997 3/7/1997 3/7/1997 3/10/1997 3/10/1997 3/10/1997 3/10/1997 3/17/1997 3/19/1997 3/19/1997 3/20/1997 3/20/1997 3/20/1997 Interoffice Memo from Walter M. Stewart to distribution list re: tissue samples collected from deceased cow. (Bates No. EID017283, JMM001778). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 1997. (Bates No. EID023547-EID023556, SDB001046-SDB001054). Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor (WVDEP) re: narrative description and Groundwater Protection Plan required for Dry Run Landfill. Includes plan. (Bates No. EID020415-EID020431, CF000269CF000285). Report form Shelia Grimes (Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory) to Belpre Animal Clinic of necropsy findings of dead 6-month bull cow. (Bates No. B 001-B 005). Report form Shelia Grimes (Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory) to Belpre Animal Clinic of necropsy findings of dead 6-month bull cow. (Bates No. USEPA 145-USEPA 148). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Daniel Weber re: disposal of materials from Washington Works. (Bates No. EID031851EID03153, GW000829-GW000831). Interoffice memo from Daniel Weber to distribution list re: issuance of formal response to FOIA request and samples taken from dead cow, and submitted for analysis. (Bates No. EID009486, JMM001903). Interoffice memo from Charles T. Abel to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: Hartley Manufacturing sending waste to Dry Run since operations began in 1984. (Bates No. EID031855, GW000790). Notes of phone call to Dr. Thomas. (Bates No. EID010433). Update: 3 meetings on Dry Run. (Bates No. EID009785, JMM000971). Update to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID009785, JMM000971). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Sarah Caspar (EPA) re: response to Dry Run Landfill information request received 2/19/97. (Bates No. EID009048-EID009067, JMM002825-JMM002844). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Sarah Caspar (EPA) re: response A43 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 128 of 326 PAGEID #: 40290 3/28/1997 3/31/1997 4/3/1997 4/4/1997 4/15/1997 4/15/1997 4/17/1997 4/17/1997 4/26/1997 5/2/1997 5/7/1997 to Dry Run Landfill information request received 2/19/97. (Bates No. EID009085-EID009114, JMM002845-JMM002874). Report from Jon S. Patterson (Animal Health Diagnostic Laboratory) to Sarah Caspar (EPA Region 3). of necropsy findings of two cows. (Bates No. USEPA 130-USEPA 134). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Local Landfill, First Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023106-EID023115, GW000496-GW000505). Letter from John G. Britvec (WVDEP) to W.M. Stewart re: forms for Permit Application found to be complete. Includes draft copy of permit and copy of memo from W.M. Stewart to H.D. Ramsey dated 4/3/97 asking for comments (Bates No. EID020222-EID020262, RAK007280RAK007326). Report of Laboratory Examination (Animal Health Diagnostic Laboratory) feed analysis. (Bates No. WVDEP 0857-WVDEP 0858). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023041-EID023052). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, March 1997. (Bates No. EID023557-EID023566, SDB001073-SDB001082). Spreadsheet of Outlet 001 data and comparison with various standards. (Bates No. EID034640-EID034641, RAK004316-RAK004317). Interoffice memo from Neil Krivanek to Anthony J. Playtis re: review of pathology report for dead bull calf performed by Krivanek and one vet. Animal death was emaciation caused by parasite and that organic and inorganic material from Outfall 001 did not contribute to death. (Bates No. EID017415, GW002280). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland re: water leaching from three areas of Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EDI039223-EID039224, TRW001183-TRW001184). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, April 1997. (Bates No. EID023567-EID023576, SDB001090-SDB001099). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara Taylor (WVDEP) re: A44 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 129 of 326 PAGEID #: 40291 5/7/1997 5/19/1997 5/29/1997 5/29/1997 5/29/1997 5/30/1997 5/30/1997 6/1997 6/6/1997 6/6/1997 6/9/1997 comments regarding NPDES permit for Dry Run Landfill. (EID020191EID020206, DDJ000271-DDJ000286). Letter from George Woytowich (DuPont) to Sheryl Chesnutt (Kemron) re: additional samples collected during quarterly July sampling to be analyzed for FC-143. (Bates No. EID008995-EID008997, GW006830GW006832). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: copy of WVDEP groundwater sampling inspection report. (Bates No. EID017996-EID017997, RAK007436-RAK007437). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, May1997. (Bates No. EID023577-EID023586, SDB001107-SDB001116). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to 3 addressees re: need to remove Mr. Tennant from property. (EID017784, DAW000247). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to 6 addressees re: cow(s). tried drinking the water exiting the lower pond discharge at Outfall 001. (Bates No. EID017681, DAW000245). Interoffice memo from Daniel Weber to distribution list re: Kemron and WVDEP use Method No. 340.2 for fluoride analysis. (Bates No. EID030653, CF000763). Memo re: Kemron and WVDEP use Method No. 340.2 for fluoride analysis. (Bates No. EID034883, DDJ001227). Draft Conceptual Work Plan prepared by Roy F. Weston. (Bates No. EID034650-EID034668, CF001317-CF001335). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Second Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023123-EID023151, CF003086-CF003105). Letter from W.M. Stewart (DuPont) to Barbara Taylor (WVDEP) re: design information to use high density polypropylene drainage net material in leachate collection system. (Bates No. EID020175EID020189, RAK001101-RAK001115). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to 7 addressees re: EPA Region III re: EPA to take samples to conduct an ecological risk assessment. (EID017890-EID017891, DAW000243-DAW000244). A45 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 130 of 326 PAGEID #: 40292 6/11/1997 6/11/1997 6/11/1997 6/12/1997 6/23/1997 6/30/1997 7/1997 7/1997 7/1997 7/2/1997 Small Mammal Sampling and Processing and Veterinary Pathology worksheets. (Bates No. EID038355-038454, JMM000863-JMM000962). Small Mammal Sampling and Processing and Veterinary Pathology worksheets. Similar to document above with the addition of some handwritten notes. (Bates No. EID038455-038554, RAK004498RAK005071). Interoffice memo from Richard Kirschner, Jr. to Lynwood K. Ireland re: status of mammal sampling. (Bates No. EID017255-EID017256, DAW000240-DAW000241). C-8 results for three site samples collected 5/22/97. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071101-EID071114, AC002652-AC002665). Dry Run Landfill 1997 Groundwater/Surface water: additional monitoring results. (Bates No. EID037761-EID037765, RAK006515-RAK006519). Memo from W.M. Stewart to L.K. Ireland re: report summarizing toxicology results indicate the only significant toxicological finding was low copper concentration. [Includes necropsy report dated 3/28/97.] (Bates No. EID017416-EID017427, JRM000135-JRM000145). Final Report: Toxicity Assessment of Soil Samples from the Dry Run Creek Site with the Lumbricid Earthworm, Eisenia Foetida [Includes cover letter from Joe Owusu-Yaw (QST) to Mike Horne (Weston). dated 6/24/97.] (Bates No. EID038266-EID038030391, RAK004995RAK005032). Final Report: Toxicity Assessment of Sediments from the Dry Run Creek Site with the Freshwater Invertebrate, Hyalella Azteca [Includes cover letter from Joe Owusu-Yaw (QST) to Mike Horne (Weston). dated 7/23/97.] (Bates No. EID038041-EID038091, JMM000762- JMM000813). Final Report: Chronic Toxicity of Surface Water Samples from the Dry Run Creek Site with the Fathead Minnow. (Bates No. EID038150EID038198, JMM000814-JMM000862). C-8 results for 11 site samples collected 5/29/97 and 6/02/97. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071115-EID071135, AC002666AC002685). A46 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 131 of 326 PAGEID #: 40293 ~ Vt r il l iu m 7/11/1997 7/14/1997 7/14/1997 7/14/1997 7/14/1997 7/17/1997 7/17/1997 7/17/1997 7/23/1997 7/28/1997 7/29/1997 Interoffice memo from Roger W. Duff to Dawn D. Jackson re: odor complaint from resident by Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID013185, RAK007220). Interoffice memo from Dawn D. Jackson to distribution re: response to odor complaint. (Bates No. EID013186-EID013188, RAK007217RAK007219). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023053EID023064). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, June 1997. (Bates No. EID023587-EID023596, SDB001126-SDB001135). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Ronald W. Meloon, Linwood K. Ireland, and Richard A. Kirschner, Jr., re: algae bloom and smell of rotten eggs coming from two collection ponds. (Bates No. EID039196, TRW001149). Interoffice memo from Neil Krivanek to Anthony J. Playtis re: report summarizing toxicology results indicate the only significant toxicological finding was low copper concentration. (Bates No. EID017810EID017811, DAW00229-DAW000231). Interoffice memo from Neil Krivanek to Anthony J. Playtis re: report summarizing toxicology results indicate the only significant toxicological finding was low copper concentration. [Same as above with the addition of a hand written note] (Bates No. EID017430, DDJ00827). Interoffice memo from Roger Duff to Dawn D. Jackson re: aerator turned on at landfill. (Bates No. EID039190, TRW001143). Email from John Little to many addressees re: fact sheet for distribution which addresses concerns about Dry Run landfill. (Bates No. EID070696-EID070698, RJZ000004-RJZ000006). Letter from Laidley Eli McCoy (Potesta) to Daniel Weber (DuPont) re: thoughts on four comments made by Affiliated Construction Trades Foundation regarding draft permit. (Bates No. EID052803-EID052805, CF000720-CF000722). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland re: no A47 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 132 of 326 PAGEID #: 40294 7/29/1997 8/6/1997 8/8/1997 8/8/1997 8/11/1997 8/12/1997 8/13/1997 8/16/1997 8/19/1997 8/28/1997 9/10/1997 leachate entered upper pond during power outage. (Bates No. EID017787, DAW000211). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to Daniel A. Weber re: electricity at Dry Run landfill -FYI. (Bates No. EID017786, DAW000210). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Jeremy S. Bruno re: first half 1997 waste to landfills. (Bates No. EID067473, CF004839). Memo from Mike McClusky re: plans to move to using recyclable drums for Teflon shipment. (Bates No. EID009796, DDJ001167). Letter from Ronald R. Potesta (Potesta) to Dan Weber (DuPont) re: proposal for surface and groundwater survey and testing. (Bates No. EID018013-EID018017, JRM000478-JRM000482). Interoffice Memo from Dawn D. Jackson to distribution re: notes from meeting with five citizens living on Pine Run Road. (Bates No. EID013156-EID013158, RAK007468-RAK007470). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Dawn D. Jackson re: oily sheen on sample from 001 outlet disappeared. (Bates No. EID039176, TRW001126). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, July 1997. (Bates No. EID023597-EID023606, SDB001145-SDB001154). Letter report form Charles Anderson re: results of vegetation survey performed on July 29-30, 1997. [Includes tables of observations] (Bates No. EID014065-EID014075, LKI000887-LKI000897). C-8 results for eight site samples collected 7/21-22/97. [Includes COC and transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill). to George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates No. EID071081-EID071100, AC002632AC002651). Project Procurement Plan. (Bates No. EID070253-EID070259, LKI001736-LKI001741). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, August 1997. (Bates No. EID023607-EID023616, SDB001167-SDB001176). A48 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 133 of 326 PAGEID #: 40295 ^ 9/12/1997 9/25/1997 9/25/1997 9/26/1997 9/29/1997 10/7/1997 10/8/1997 10/9/1997 10/15/1997 10/17/1997 10/31/1997 10/31/1997 \ TRILLIUM,, Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Third Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023152-EID023172, GW000526-GW000546). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland and Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: notes from Public Service Commission meeting and discussion of individuals attending hearing protesting DuPont's operation. (Bates No. EID017703-EID017705, DAW000201DAW000203). Interoffice memo from H. David Ramsey, Jr. to 10 addressees re: sensitive information. (Bates No. EID017702, DAW000200). Letter from Dawn Jackson to Lyn Westbrook re: list of substances from operating permit that might be in Dry Run landfill. Memo from V. Kansal to R. Singhvi re: analytical results and COCs for samples collected in June 97. (Bates No. EID038821-EID038972, RAK004742-RAK004890). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023065-EID023076). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, September 1997. (Bates No. EID023617-EID023626, SDB001192-SDB001201). Interoffice memo from David F. Eggleston to Daniel A. Weber re: asbestos waste going to Meadowfill Landfill. (Bates No. EID037650, JMM007652). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner to David F. Eggleston re: asbestos waste to Dry Run Landfill between `95 and `97. (Bates No. EID037650, JMM007652). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to 2 addresses re: responses to comments during permit renewal process and comment about carpet from manufacturer being dumped at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID017884, DAW000197). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1997. (Bates No. EID023627-EID023636, SDB001217-SDB001226). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to David Chaney (WVDEP) re: transmittal of A49 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 134 of 326 PAGEID #: 40296 ^ Nov-97 Nov-97 Nov-97 11/7/1997 11/21/1997 12/1/1997 12/5/1997 12/23/1997 1998 1998 Jan-98 1/5/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, computer disk containing all available waster analysis results from samples taken at Letart Landfill. (Bates No. EID069704-EID069705, CF005158-CF005159). Results of histopathology for the meadow vole and analytical results of several water samples (Bates No. EID038092-EIDEID038149, RAK005171-RAK005228). Draft Report prepared by Mark D. Sprenger, Ph.D. and Michael T. Horne, Ph.D. (Bates No. USFW 0579-USFW 1244). Operations plan prepared by Potesta & Associates, Inc. for DuPont Polymers, Project No. 97016. (Bates No. EID020149-EID020167, JRM000303-JRM000322). Email from Roger to Jim re: disposal costs for C-8 containing wastes and non-C-8 containing wastes. (Bates No. EID070699, RJZ000007). Fax from Rich Kirschner to Pat Lane (Kemron) re: sampling changes. (Bates No. EID030656, RAK004155). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, November 1997. (Bates No. EID023641-EID23650, SDB001245-SDB001254). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1997 Revision. (Bates No. EID023637EID023640, SDB001241-SDB001244). Interoffice memo from Dan Weber to distribution list re: key findings and comments from EPA's draft report on Dry Run Creek. (Bates No. EID039437-EID039443, JMM002201-JMM002207). Dry Run Landfill Usage by Fluoroproducts in 1997. (Bates No. EID015222, RLR001145). Natural Fluoride Levels in Soil, GW, and SW. (Bates No. EID045511EID045518, ASH000050-ASH000057). Fluoride sources to Dry Run Landfill (Bates No. EID016853-EID016854, JMM000049-JMM000050). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, December 1997. (Bates No. EID023651-EID023660, SDB001272-SDB001281). A50 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 135 of 326 PAGEID #: 40297 1/6/1998 1/9/1998 1/13/1998 1/13/1998 1/13/1998 1/13/1998 1/14/1998 1/16/1998 1/20/1998 1/20/1998 1/20/1998 1/22/1998 Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Fourth Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023252EID02371,GW000567-GW000586). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: formation of the Team to develop a scientific response to the EPA draft report on Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID067081-EID067082, RLR001276RLR001277). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023077-EID023088). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: reviewof Dry Run Lanfill draft report. (Bates No. EID067085-EID067086, RAK004496-RAK004497). Interoffice memo from Mary Jenkins to Robert L. Ritchey re: have not seen materials for review. (Bates No. EID067087, RAK004490). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Mary Jenkins re: copy of report being sent ASAP. (Bates No. EID067088, RAK004491). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: include Oct. `96 data, monthly sampling data summaries for 1996 and 1997, and statistical comparisons of Mn and other data. (Bates No. EID067089, RAK004492). Interoffice memo from J. Bart Ruiter to Richard Kirschner, Jr. re: draft report does not need NPDES review. (Bates No. EID067090, RAK004458). Title blocks from topographic map of site. (Bates No. EID037766EID037767, RAK006520-RAK006521). Memo from Timothy S. Bingman to Daniel Weber re: several symptoms found in cattle are not attributable to fluoride. (Bates EID039503EID039505, DAW000533-DAW000535). Interoffice memo from Timothy S. Bingman to Daniel Weber re: effects of fluoride in cattle references (Bates No. EID017440, JMM002167). Interoffice memo from Matthew S. Bogdanffy to Richard Kirschenr, Jr. and Daniel Weber re: due to poor procedures, inferences drawn in the Dry Run report with regard to mammalian species at risk are not supported by A51 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 136 of 326 PAGEID #: 40298 1/23/1998 1/23/1998 1/27/1998 1/27/1998 1/28/1998 1/28/1998 1/30/1998 2/2/1998 2/2/1998 2/2/1998 2/2/1998 2/3/1998 the experimental data presented in the report. (Bates No. EID067154EID067156, DAW000158-DAW000160). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey re: response to three questions asked by John Britvec. (Bates No. EID017880EID017881, DAW000152-DAW000153). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Daniel A. Weber re: Comments on EPA draft report. (Bates No. EID067076-EID067079, DAW000154-DAW000158). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: Technical Review Summary of EPA's Dry Run Creek Draft Report. (Bates No. EID067025-EID067031, RAK004360-RAK004366). Technical Review Summary of EPA's Dry Run Creek Draft Report. (Bates No. EID067466-EID067470, JMM002365-JMM002369). Email from H. David Ramsey to Roger J. Zipfel re: involvement in helping to prepare for Dry Run landfill meeting with EPA. (Bates No. EID070704, RJZ000033). Interoffice memo from Keith B. Pierson to Robert L. Ritchey re: summary of technical issues discussed during conference call. (Bates No. EID067198-EID067199, DAW000138-DAW000139). Washington Works, 1997 Annual Landfill Report. Permit WV0076244. Includes cover letter from R.L. Ritchey to Barbara S. Taylor. (Bates No. EID037754-EID037760, RAK006508-RAK006514). Kemron report for formaldehyde (OUTLET 001) (Bates No. EID023466EID023472, SDB001878-SDB001884). Interoffice memo from Andrew S. Hartten to Richard A. Kirchner, Jr. re: pump to use for sampling MW-14. (Bates No. EID030695, RAK004309). Kemron report for samples Outlet 001 and 1000 Ft Downstream. (Bates No. EID023403-EID023417, SDB001895-SDB001909). Email from Carey to Zipfel re: items sent to Dry Run on an annual basis from Granular. (Bates No. EID070700, RJZ000008). Memo from Roger Zipfel to Bob Ritchey re: information requested concerning the types and amounts of materials sent to Dry Run Landfill A52 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 137 of 326 PAGEID #: 40299 ^ 2/5/1998 2/6/1998 2/6/1998 2/9/1998 2/9/1998 2/10/1998 2/10/1998 2/13/1998 2/16/1998 2/17/1998 2/17/1998 2/17/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, by Fluoroproducts BTO. (Bates No. EID031870-EID031907, JMM001895-JMM001205). Email from Roger to George re: polymeric material being sent to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070701, RJZ000009). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Daniel A. Weber re: non standard polymer due to molecular weight or particle size still inherently stable fluoropolymer. (Bates No. EID015217, RLR001140). Email from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey re: Fluorides Sources to Dry Run Landfill (slide) (Bates No. EID015202-EID015203, RLR001975-RLR001976). Email from Dan Weber to Ritcherl, Ramsey, and Zipfel re: movement and disposal of FC-143. (Bates No. EID070702, RJZ000010). Email from Daniel Weber to John Migliore re: discussion of FC143 (Bates No. EID045015, JMM007804). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution list re: re: call from Mr. Mike Torrino, Region III, new person on Dry Run project. (Bates No. EID024340, JMM002156). Email from George Woytowich to distribution re: call from Mr. Mike Torrino, Region III, new person on Dry Run project. (Bates No. EID070289, GW007087). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, January 1998. (Bates No. EID023383-EID023392, SDB001910-SDB001919). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty to Daniel A. Weber re: search done on fluoropolymers, analytical methods, and environmental samples. (Bates No. EID017815, DAW000123). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: visit to landfill by Mike Taurino. (Bates No. EID067732-EID067734, RLR001724-RLR001726). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber re: Fluoride Sources to Dry Run Landfill. Bates No. EID008651-EID008652, JMM002105-JMM002106). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber re: Technical Review Summary on EPA Dry Run Report. (Bates No. EID067032-EID067037, A53 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 138 of 326 PAGEID #: 40300 2/17/1998 2/19/1998 2/19/1998 2/19/1998 2/23/1998 3/4/1998 3/5/1998 3/10/1998 3/27/1998 3/30/1998 4/1/1998 4/2/1998 4/6/1998 JMM002111-JMM002116). Technical Review Summary on EPA Dry Run Report. [Same as document listed above w/o interoffice memo.] (Bates No. EID067038-EID067042, DDJ000528-DDJ000532). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. and Thomas R. Waldron re: asbestos disposal contract in place and as of 1/1/98 asbestos was no longer sent to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID031912, CF000719). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Matthew S. Bogdanffy, Daniel A. Weber, and Righard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: phenols detected in cattle feces. (Bates No. EID067476, RAK004303). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey re: Technical Review Summary on EPA Dry Run Report. (Bates No. EID067062-EID067068, RLR001114-RLR001120). Agenda with hand written notes. (Bates No. EID067280, RLR001107). Kemron report for Outlet 001 and 1000 Ft Downstream. (Bates No. EID023444-EID023460, SDB001856-SDB001872). Interoffice memo from John G. Britvec to Pravin Sangani re: disk copy of draft letter revised to address DuPont concerns and comments raised by the public. (Bates No. WVDEP 0989). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 1998. (Bates No. EID023393-EID023402, SDB001885-SDB001894). Cattle Expert discussion w/ M Bogdanffy [hand written notes] (Bates No. EID017441, RLR001046). Table 4: Concentrations of Metals in Water, Dry Run Creek, Washington, Wood County, WV, November 1997. (Bates No. EID067478). Kemron report for samples Outlet 001 and 1000 Ft Downstream. (Bates No. EID023519-EID023525, SDB001823-SDB001829). Hand written notes of call from Carl Muska. (Bates No. EID017442, RLR001045). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry A54 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 139 of 326 PAGEID #: 40301 4/8/1998 4/8/1998 4/9/1998 4/14/1998 4/14/1998 4/14/1998 4/14/1998 4/14/1998 4/14/1998 4/15/1998 4/21/1998 4/22/1998 4/27/1998 Run Landfill, First Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID023201-EID023221, GW000587-GW000607). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, March 1998. (Bates No. EID023418-EID023427, SDB001830-SDB001839). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID023173-EID023200). Memo from Paul E. Ross to Carl Muska re: Alleged Effects on Cattle Near the Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID017444-EID017445, RLR001042-RLR001043). WVDEP OWR NPDES Water Pollution Control permit. (Bates No. USEPA 1196-USEPA 1225). Letter from Barbara S. Taylor to Robert L. Ritchey. Order of Compliance. (Bates No. USEPA 1226-USEPA 1231). Interoffice memo from Lydia R. Cox to Carl F. Muska re: possible chromosomal damage in the cattle herd. (Bates No. EID017446EID017447, RLR001040-RLR001041). Response to Public Comments. (Bates No. WVDEP 1002-WVDEP 1006). Letter from Barbara S. Taylor to Robert L. Ritchey re: DuPont's responses to draft permit. (Bates No. USEPA 1188-USEPA1195). Letter from Barbara S. Taylor to Shirley A. Skaggs, Esq. re: comments of the Affiliated Construction Trades Foundation regarding the draft permit. (Bates No. WVDEP 1089-WVDEP 1090). Lancaster Laboratories formaldehyde results for Outfall 001. (Bates No. EID023461-EID023465, SDB001873-SDB001877). Field logs of 1998 Deer Reproduction study. (Bates No. USFW 0526USFW 0566). Kemron report for Outfall 001 and 1000 Ft Downstream. (Bates No. EID02343 8-EID023443, SDB001850-SDB001855). Letter from Melvin H. Boso (Boso Equipment) to Ton Waldron re: dead deer on landfill property. (Bates No. EID005585, JRM000022). A55 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 140 of 326 PAGEID #: 40302 ~ Vtrillium 4/30/1998 5/5/1998 5/6/1998 5/7/1998 5/12/1998 5/14/1998 5/14/1998 5/15/1998 5/20/1998 5/26/1998 5/28/1998 Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, April 1998. (Bates No. EID023428-EID023437, SDB001840-SDB001849). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey and Linwood K. Ireland re: analysis frequency for C-8. (Bates No. EID007938, HDR000385). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty to Harry L. Gearhart II re: methods for fluorocarbons and fluorochlorocarbons. (Bates No. EID009806, RLR000742). Faxed copy of memo from Richard Kirschener to Pat Lane (Kemron). re: changes in Dry Run Sampling. [One page attached discussing water levels and stagnant water removal.] (Bates No. EID067540-EID067541). Hand written note from Bob Ritchey to Dave Ramsey attached to first draft of 2 page summary. (Bates No. EID010364-EID010366, JMM000659-JMM000661). Letter from Robert L. Ritchey to Sarah L. Caspar re: documentation and detailed discussion of concerns. (Bates No. USEPA 0620-USEPA 0636). Faxed letter from Laidley Eli McCoy to Daniel Weber re: observations on Dry Run Landfill Permit. [Includes suggested draft letter from Potesta to Barbara Taylor requesting a permit modification.] (Bates No. EID052957-EID052962, RAK000819-RAK000824). Interoffice memo from Harry L. Gearhart to John F. Doughty re: methods for fluorocarbons and fluorochlorocarbons. (Bates No. EID009806, RLR000742). Letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: acknowledges receipt of samples collected 5/19/98 for C-8 analysis. [Includes COC and login documentation] (Bates No. EID008298EID008302, GW006742-GW006746). Interoffice memo from Bharat O. Desai to Richard A. Kirschner re: TSS , Al, and Fe results for fabric filter lab test on landfill leachate. Forwarded by Richard A. Kirschner to Thomas R. Waldron and Jon F. Moore on 5/27/99. (Bates No. EID039317, TRW000907). Letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont) re: acknowledges receipt of samples collected 5/26/98 for C-8 analysis. A56 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 141 of 326 PAGEID #: 40303 6/1/1998 6/2/1998 6/2/1998 6/8/1998 6/8/1998 6/9/1998 6/9/1998 6/11/1998 6/15/1998 6/15/1998 6/15/1998 [Includes COC and login documentation] (Bates No. EID008304EID008307, SDB002324-SBD002327). Letter from Barbara S. Taylor (WVDEP) to Robert L. Ritchey re: correction of typographical errors. [Includes copies of corrected pages.] (Bates No. WVDEP 1161-WVDEP 1163). Kemron report for sample 001 Outlett (Bates No. EID023519EID023525, SDB001823-SDB001829). REI Consultants Acute Toxicity Bioassay Report for samples collected 5/19/98. [Includes interoffice memo from Daniel Weber to distribution]. (Bates No. EID030698-EID030705, CF000695-CF000702). Interoffice memo from Robert Pinchot to DuPont personnel re: F-11 analytical/effects help. (Bates No. EID009807, RLR000743). CH2M Hill results for samples collected 5/19/98 for C-8 analysis. Includes transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill). to George Woytowich (DuPont) (Bates No. EID018766-EID018782, GW006801GW006817). CH2M Hill results for samples collected 5/26/98 for C-8 analysis. Includes transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont) (Bates No. EID018060-EID018076, GW006768GW006884). CH2M Hill results for samples collected 5/27/98 for C-8 analysis. Includes transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to Dan Weber (DuPont) (Bates No. EID018552-EID018567, GW006785GW006800). Interoffice Memo from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey re: EPA uses Modified 524.2 for VOCs in soil and Emron uses Method 624. (Bates No. EID017850, DAW000115). Revised Kemron report for samples 001 OUTLET, STREAM 1, and STREAM 2. [Includes results for 001 OUTLET from 6/2/98 report.] (Bates No. EID023486-EID0235202, SDB001790-SDB001806). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, May 1998. (Bates No. EID023473-EID023485, SDB001777-SDB001789). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty to Daniel A. Weber re: unlikely A57 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 142 of 326 PAGEID #: 40304 ^ 6/15/1998 6/16/1998 6/22/1998 6/24/1998 6/24/1998 6/24/1998 6/24/1998 6/25/1998 6/26/1998 7/8/1998 7/9/1998 7/10/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, that F-113 could be misidentified as F-11. (Bates No. EID009803). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty to Daniel A. Weber re: would like confirmation that other peaks wee not present. (Bates No. EID009803). Dry Run Landfill Groundwater/surface Water Monitoring Summary of 1998 FC-143 Analytical Results. (Bates No. EID016804, RLR000245). Hand written notes re: 1) deformity in doe fetus, 2) two tank trucks of formaldehyde, 3) Walt's credibility. (Bates No. EID017448, RLR001050). Interoffice memo from Daneil A. Weber to H. David Ramsey, Robert L. Ritchey, and Lynwood K. Ireland re: box van disposal at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID017851, DAW000114). Email from Vera L. Wigal (DuPont) to DuPont personnel; tabulated FC143 results. (Bates No. EID009493-EID009494, RLR002057RLR002058). FC-143 sample data from CH2M Hill. Samples collected 5/19/98. (Bates No. EID071078, AC002581). Handwritten notes of call from Ron Potesta and Eli McCoy re: issue with deer fetus and deer harvest. (Bates No. EID017449, RLR001048). Interoffice memo from Michael D. Aucoin to Daniel A. Weber re: use of modified 524.2 for soils and the use of methanol by the lab. [Includes 8260A compound list with soil and water LOQs. (Bates No. EID024410EID024413, JMM002633-JMM002636). Handwritten notes from call from Potesta re: discussion of deer harvest and visual findings. (Bates No. EID017451, RLR001047). Dry Run Landfill Soil Sampling Data Summary. (Bates No. WVDEP 1164-WVDEP 1166). CH2M Hill results for samples collected 6/16/98 for C-8 analysis. Includes transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont) (Bates No. EID007598-EID007611, GW003750GW003763). Interoffice memo from H. David Ramsey, Jr. to distribution re: summary of meeting with Office of Water Resources. (Bates No. EID017707, A58 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 143 of 326 PAGEID #: 40305 ^ 7/13/1998 7/13/1998 7/14/1998 7/15/1998 7/15/1998 7/15/1998 7/17/1998 7/20/1998 7/20/1998 7/20/1998 7/21/1998 7/22/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, RLR002061). Memo from R. Valentine to C.A. Muska re: comments on Dry Creek Run situation. (Bates No. EID017452-EID017454, RLR001006RLR001008). Letter from R. L. Ritchey to Michael A. Zeto (Office of Water Resources) re: sign-in sheet for 2/23/98 meeting between DuPont and Region III. [Includes sign-in sheet.] (Bates No. EID001819-EID001820, CF000117CF000118). Handwritten notes of 7/14/98 meeting. (Bates No. EID010435EID010437, RLR000929-RLR000931). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, June 1998. (Bates No. EID023526-EID023537, RAK0007940-RAK000805). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution list re: TSS exceedance in June. (Bates EID030713, JMM000364). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to H. David Ramsey, Jr. re: ways to address discharge exceedances. (Bates No. EID030714EID030716, HDR000361-HDR000363). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Second Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID023222-EID023231, GW003891-GW003900). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID001275EID001298). Handwritten notes of conference call to Sarah Caspar. (Bates No. EID067295-EID067297, RLR000961-RLR000963). Handwritten notes of EPA conference call. (Bates No. EID067298EID067303, JMM002520-JMM002525). Group 2 List of compounds which may be present at the Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID015204-EID015205, RLR001967-RLR001968). EPA Sampling at Dry Run Landfill: Sediment/Soil Split Sample Results. (Bates No. WVDEP 1167). A59 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 144 of 326 PAGEID #: 40306 7/23/1998 7/28/1998 7/29/1998 8/4/1998 8/4/1998 8/6/1998 8/7/1998 8/7/1998 8/8/1998 8/9/1998 8/11/1998 8/11/1998 8/11/1998 Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: samples collected. (Bates No. EID030717-EID030719, RLR000825RLR000827). Handwritten notes of conference call (Bates No. EID067304, RGS000797). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland re: tour of landfill with resident. (Bates No. EID039427, TRW001035). Group 1 List of compounds which may be present at the Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID015206, RLR001966). Draft Group 1 and Group 2 lists of compounds which may be present at the Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID047116-EID047117, RGS000818RGS000819). Bioassay report for sample collected from 001 outlet Dry Run on 8/3/98. Same as 8/13/98 document except missing "Test Results" page and includes additional data sheet. (Bates No. EID001366-EID001372, GW003947-GW003953). Interoffice memo from Michael D. Aucoin to Daniel Weber re: weighting factor applied to PAHs to determine total B(a).P equivalent. (Bates No. EID024440, HDR000264). Toxicity of trichlorofluoromethane and trichlorotrifluoroethene. (Bates No. EID009808, RLR000744). Interoffice Memo from Thomas Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland and John Mathews re: observations of silt and turbid water at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID030998). Interoffice Memo from Thomas Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland and John Mathews re: observations of silt and turbid water at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID017500). Summary of cattle findings. (Bates No. EID017457-EID017458, RLR000818-RLR000819). Handwritten notes of EPA meeting. (Bates No. EID067314-EID067316, GW002104-GW002106). Handwritten notes of meeting between EPA, DEP, and DuPont. (Bates No. EID067310-EID067312, RLR000814-RLR000816). A60 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 145 of 326 PAGEID #: 40307 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 8/11/1998 8/11/1998 8/11/1998 8/11/1998 8/11/1998 8/13/1998 8/13/1998 8/14/1998 8/14/1998 8/14/1998 8/17/1998 8/18/1998 Purpose Statement for collaborative effort between EPA and DuPont. (Bates No. EID017942, JMM002629). Lists of Group 1 (materials known to be present at Dry Run) and Group 2 (materials which may be present at Dry Run). Includes hand written notes. (Bates No. USEPA 0822-USEPA 0824). Dry Run Creek Landfill: Considerations for Further Study (Bates No. EID017459-EID017466, JMM00265 8-JMM002665). Agenda Dry Run Landfill Meeting. Includes hand written notes. (Bates No. EID067313, RLR000817). Hand written notes of "Action Items 8/11/98 Dry Run LF `Next Steps' Mtg." (Bates No. WVDEP 1169-WVDEP 1172). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, July 1998. (Bates No. EID001335-EID001344, GW003955-GW003964). Bioassay report for sample collected from 001 outlet Dry Run on 8/3/98. (Bates No. WVDEP 1207-WVDEP 1212). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to John F. Doughty, Daniel A. Weber, and Lou Bedekovick re: Butacite sent to Dry Run was made with 4G7. (Bates No. EID015170, RLR000144). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: EPA needs list of degradation products of major polymers and resins landfilled at Dry Run since it began operation. (Bates No. EID066109-EID066111, CF000641-CF000643). Qualitative Benthic Survey Report for Satation in Fry Run Creek, Wood County, WV. August 1998. (Bates No. EID001347-EID001357, GW004043-GW004053). Interoffice memo from Robert Ritchey to distribution re: EPAs approval to proceed with collaborative program. [Second page identical to first page except different font.} (Bates No. EID067317-EID067318, RLR001776, RLR000813). Letter from Ralph G. Stahl to Sarah Caspar re: draft proposal for collaborative effort. [Includes cover email dated 8/18/98 discussing availability.] (Bates No. EID001822-EID001824, RLR001786- A61 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 146 of 326 PAGEID #: 40308 ^ 8/18/1998 8/18/1998 8/18/1998 8/18/1998 8/19/1998 8/19/1998 8/20/1998 8/22/1998 8/22/1998 8/24/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, RLR001788). Email from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland and John R. Mathews re: dead deer found in vicinity of MW-13 and MW-13A. Appears that deer was dead for a few days and dragged to that location. (Bates No. EID008018, RLR001999). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Sarah Caspar re: names for Collaborative Program Teams. (Bates No. EID041650-EID041651, GPS000608-GPS000609). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 6 addressees re: transmittal Collaborative Program Teams memo to Sarah Caspar and EPA to fill role of wildlife biologist. (Bates No. EID041652-EID041651, GPS000610GPS000609). Email from Richard Kirschner to John R. Mathews, H. David Ramsey, Jr., Robert L. Ritchey, Daniel A. Weber, and Dawn D. Jackson re: inspection of dead deer by Jeff McCrady (DNR). Email forwarded by Robert L. Ritchey to Rudolph Valentine, Lydia R. Cox, Paul e. Ross, and Lynwood K. Ireland. (Bates No. EID008654-EID008655, RLR001995RLR001996). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 4 addressees re: procedures to take for the next time a dead deer is found and input on blue tongue. (Bates No. IED067319-EID061320, GPS000554-GPS000555). Typed note re: "Jeff' unwilling to fill our report or sign anything since he could not definitively say why the animal died. (Bates No. EID008658, HDR000281). Interoffice memo from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr., to Mark Sprenger and Sarah Caspar re: resources for implementing small animal work at Dry Run and adjacent areas. (Bates No. EID000236-EID000237, RLR000750RLR000751). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland and John R. Mathews re: observations of dead deer made by Jeff McCraddy (DNR). (Bates No. EID039417-EID039418, TRW001023-TRW001024). Field notes of Dennis Stottlemyer (Potesta & Associates). (Bates No. EID007939, RLR000764). Letter report form Charles Anderson re: results of vegetation survey performed on July 20-21, 1998. [Includes tables of observations and A62 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 147 of 326 PAGEID #: 40309 8/25/1998 8/26/1998 8/26/1998 8/26/1998 8/27/1998 8/27/1998 8/27/1998 8/28/1998 8/28/1998 8/28/1998 mineral results on grasses, and interoffice memo of transmittal.] (Bates No. EID048279-EID048297, CF003985-CF004003). Interoffice memo from Sarah Caspar to Robert L. Ritchey re: EPA approves DuPont's proposal for Collaborative Program Teams and provides EPA members in program. (Bates No. EID001827, RLR000749). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 6 addressees re: informed Sarah Caspar of dead deer inspection. (Bates No. EID014143, DAW000085). Interoffice memo from Daniel Weber to Robert L. Ritchey, H. David Ramsey, Jr., and Lynwood K. Ireland re: difficulty in taking benthic sample due to little or no stream flow. (Bates No. EID030739, RAK008832). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: EPAs approval of collaborative process. (Bates No. EID067321-EID067322, RLR001792-RLR001793). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: call with Mike Zeto (WVDEP) discussing dead deer found and DuPont's protocol for responding to future deer found. (Bates No. EID008022-EID008023, RLR000756-RLR000757). CH2M Hill results for samples collected 7/15/98 for C-8 analysis. Includes transmittal letter from Spencer Hamil (CH2M Hill) to George Woytowich (DuPont) (Bates No. EID024230-EID024242, GW006751GW006763). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Charles L. Mullins, Cheryl S. Fisher, and Walt Lively re: TCLP may provide information about degradation of materials landfilled at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID066145, CF000646). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to Barbara S. Taylor (WVDEP) re: Office of Water Resources participation in Dry Run Landfill discussions. (Bates No. EID000227, RLR000747). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 6 addressees re: discussion with Mike Zeto about deer harvest and citizen concern about eating deer from Dry Run area. (Bates No. EID067325, GPS000553). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 6 addressees re: discussion A63 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 148 of 326 PAGEID #: 40310 ^ 8/31/1998 8/31/1998 8/31/1998 Sep-98 9/1/1998 9/1/1998 9/1/1998 9/1/1998 9/1/1998 9/8/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, with Mike Zeto about deer harvest and citizen concern about eating deer from Dry Run area. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID067326, GPS000554). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to John F. Doughty and Daniel A. Weber re: propose to remove polyacrylic acid from major constituent list and add n-butyl methacrylate and ethyl methacrylate. (Bates No. EID015175, RLR000152). Interoffice memo from Charles L. Mullins to Robert L. Ritchey re: can not come up with anything that would be a significant change in waste streams to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID066143). Memo from Robert Ritchey to distribution list re: minutes of 8/11/98 Dry Run Landfill meeting. (Bates No. EID097327-EID067328, RV000449RV000450). Product Information sheets for FluoradTM Fluorochemical Emulsifiers FC118 and FC-1090. Interoffice memo from Cheryl s. Fisher to Robert L. Ritchey re: no TCLP results for fluoropolymer wastes that would be sent to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID066144, CF000645). Interoffice memo from Lou Bedekovich to Robert L. Ritchey re: incineration and disposal of Butacite. (Bates No. EID066146). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Rudolph Valentine, Ralph G. Stahl, Jr., Michael D. Aucoin, and Daniel A. Weber re: Appendix 1 list has been revised to remove polyacrylic acid from major constituent list and add n-butyl methacrylate and ethyl methacrylate. (Bates No. EID015174, RLR000151). Email from Dawn D. Jackson to Rudolph Valentine re: memo dated 12/13/95 concerning a conversation between Jim Crum and Mr. Tennant. (Bates No. EID044737-EID044738, RV000447-RV000448). Group 1 Appendix: Major monomers and constituents of Group 1 resins. (Bates No. EID067329, RLR001799). Interoffice memo from Richard L. Johnson to distribution list re: Polymer/Resin Decomposition Information-Acrylic Polymers in a Landfill Environment. (Bates No. EID066150-EID066152, CF000666CF000668). A64 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 149 of 326 PAGEID #: 40311 ^ 9/8/1998 9/10/1998 9/10/1998 9/11/1998 9/11/1998 9/14/1998 9/14/1998 9/16/1998 9/22/1998 9/22/1998 9/22/1998 9/30/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to 6 addressees re: 9/8/98 WVDEP Inspection at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID017835, DAW000079). Memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: minutes of 8/11/98 Dry Run Landfill Meeting. (USEPA 0832-USEPA 0857). Hand written notes of conference call with Steering Team. (Bates No. EID067330-EID067333, RLR000616-RLR000619). Letter from Robert L. Ritchey to John G. Britvec re: changes made in the 1993-1994 timeframe. (Bates No. EID000228-000229, RLR000613RLR000614). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 23 addressees re: conference call held on 9/10/98 between DuPont, WV-OWR and EPA. Discussed plans for next round of small mammal sampling. (Bates No. EID041715EID041717, GPS000707-GPS000709). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, August 1998. (Bates No. EID001358-EID001369, GW003939-GW3946). Hand written notes of phone call with Paul Ross. (Bates No. EID008021, RLR000608). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Ronald W. Meloon and Lynwood K. Ireland re: observations made during tour of landfill on 9/16/98. (Bates No. EID016848, CF000694). Hand written notes of talking points for John Sieg visit. (Bates No. EID009810-EID009812, RLR000597-RLR000599). Interoffice memo from Dawn D. Jackson to distribution re: update of Washington Works Responsible Care Team meeting. (Bates No. EID066086-EID066088, RLR000591-RLR000593). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution list re: Ceil Mancini and EPA personnel to visit site. (Bates No. EID067334, HDR000200). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: contents of Mr. Tennant's videotapes. (Bates No. EID010392-EID010393, RLR000576-RLR000577). A65 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 150 of 326 PAGEID #: 40312 ^ 9/30/1998 10/7/1998 10/8/1998 10/8/1998 10/9/1998 10/9/1998 10/12/1998 10/12/1998 10/12/1998 10/13/1998 10/13/1998 10/14/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, Email from Daniel A. Weber to Daniel A. Weber re: C-8 info slides for RLR meeting 10/5/98. (Bates No. EID045003-EID045004, JMM007792-JMM007793). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Third Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID023232-EID023241, GW003865-GW003874). Email from Michael D. Aucoin to Robert L. Ritchey re: identification of materials landfilled. (Bates No. EID009747-EID009748, RLR001969RLR001970). Email from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: DNR not planning deer report. (Bates No. EID005586, RLR001987). Letter report from D. Mark Kiser (Potesta) to Dan Weber (DuPont) re: completion of hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of receiving stream. (Bates No. EID070621-EID070622, ASH000174-ASH000175). Letter report from D. Mark Kiser (Potesta) to Dan Weber (DuPont) re: completion of hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of receiving stream. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID030282-EID030284, JMM002801-JMM002803). Interoffice memo from Gary W. Klesel to Daniel A. Weber re: status of landfill improvements. (Bates No. EID031011, RAK008801). Email from Allison A. Crane to Daniel A. Weber re: results indicate that the material is acceptable to send to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070327, AC002422). Response to email from Allison A. Crane to Daniel A. Weber re: results indicate that the material is acceptable to send to Dry Run. Email from Daniel A. Weber to Allison a. Crane re: OK as long as not in 55 gal. drums and no free liquids. (Bates No. EID070328, AC002423). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber re: potential foaming material at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID016841, JMM002711). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber re: known foaming material at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID017854-EID017855, DAW000072DAW000073). Interoffice memo from Gary W. Klesel to Daniel A. Weber re: Outlet 002 put into service on 8/11/98. (Bates No. EID017821, DAW000071). A66 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 151 of 326 PAGEID #: 40313 ~ Vtrillium 10/14/1998 10/14/1998 10/14/1998 10/14/1998 10/14/1998 10/20/1998 10/21/1998 10/21/1998 10/21/1998 10/23/1998 10/23/1998 10/23/1998 Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Lynwood K. Ireland re: use of "Aquashade" (triphenylmethane) for plant growth control. (Bates No. EID016835, JMM002751). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: Aquashade OK for use in sedimentation pond. (Bates No. EID016833-EID016835, CF000682-CF000683). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, September1998. (Bates No. EID001419, GW003937). Dry Run Landfill Sedimentation Pond Additives. [Includes Group 2 list.] (Bates No. EID063176-EID063179, JMM002797-JMM002798). Interoffice memo from Ralph G. Stahl to distribution re: incorporate comments into draft of scope of work for small animal trapping. (Bates No. EID067340, RLR000543). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID001373-EID001398). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: allegations of health effects in Mr. Tennant's family. (Bates No. EID066098, LKI001230). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: allegations of health effects in Mr. Tennant's family. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID010448, RLR000536). Interoffice memo from Ralph G. Stahl to distribution re: proposed agenda for Technical Work Group Meeting. (Bates No. EID040412EID040414). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: deer fetus studies file review at DNR. (Bates No. EID008027-EID008028, RLR000530-RLR000531). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to David E. Overton re: need molecular weights for polymers and resins. (Bates No. EID066176, CF000644). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to John Gannon re: molecular weights. (Bates No. EID066177, JMM002757). A67 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 152 of 326 PAGEID #: 40314 ^ 10/23/1998 10/23/1998 10/27/1998 10/28/1998 10/28/1998 10/28/1998 10/28/1998 10/29/1998 10/29/1998 10/29/1998 10/30/1998 10/30/1998 11/3/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, Interoffice memo from James R. Lawson to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weights of Delrin. (Bates No. EID066180). Transmittal letter from Ronald R. Potesta (Potesta & Associates) to Mr. Robert L. Ritchey re: raw data sheets for 1998 doe fetus study. (Bates No. EID007941-EIDEID007958, RLR000501-RLR000518). Handwritten note construction phase status. (Bates No. EID031167, HDR000161). Email from Roger J. Zipfel to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weight of various resins. (Bates No. EID070703, RJZ000013). Email from Robert L. Ritchey to John Gannon re: molecular weight ranges and characteristics of fluoropolymers. (Bates No. EID070705EID070706, RJZ000037-RJZ000038). Interoffice memo from fluoropolymer molecular weight ranges. (Bates No. EID014118-EID014119, DAW000047-DAW000048). Interoffice memo from Roger J. Zipfel to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weights for specific resins. (Bates No. EID066186, CF000623). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: foam forming in lower pond. (Bates No. EID030763, RAK008791). Interoffice memo from Richard A.. Morgan to Roger J. Zipfel re: molecular weight range for irradiated PTFE micropowder ranges. (Bates No. EID066192). Email from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to distribution re: keys points for discussion at meeting. (Bates No. EID066185, RGS000231). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: Dry Run Landfill leachate management. (Bates No. EID030767-EID030768, RAK008787-RAK008788). Letter from Sarah Caspar (EPA) to Ceil Mancini (Woodward-Clyde) re: comments on draft work plan for small mammal trapping investigation in Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID040423- EID040425, JMM002700JMM002702). Memo from Robert Ritchey to 7 addressees re: update to event timeline. (Bates No. EID037485-EID039480, DAW000499-DAW000504). A68 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 153 of 326 PAGEID #: 40315 ,, 11/3/1998 11/3/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 11/4/1998 ~ Vtrillium Dry Run Landfill Sedimentation Pond Additives. (Bates No. EID031974, JMM002800). Interoffice memo from David E. Overton to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weights for polyesters. (Bates No. EID066195, CF000600). Email from John F. Doughty (DuPont) to DuPont personnel re: foam sample collected from lower pond was found to be the sodium salt of an acrylic polymer with a high acid content. (Bates No. EID016811EID016812, RLR002031-RLR002032). Interoffice memo from John F. Doughty (DuPont) to DuPont personnel re: foam sample collected from lower pond was found to be the sodium salt of an acrylic polymer with a high acid content. [Same as email from John F. Doughty dated 11/4/98] (Bates No. EID030773-EID030775, RLR000108-RLR000110). Email from Robert Ritchey to John Gannon and Michael Aucoin (response to 11/4/98 email from John Doughty re: additional work on degradation products. (Bates No. EID016811-EID016812, RLR002031RLR002032). Email from Robert Ritchey to DuPont personnel (response to 11/4/98 email from John Doughty). re: Tennant's video tapes show foaming and have identified to EPA several materials known to be foamers that have been landfilled over the years. (Bates No. EID016818-EID016819, RLR002029-RLR002030). Notes of Employee Response Case Team. Includes site maps. (Bates EID067253-EID067265, RLR000053-RLR000062, JMM002370JMM002372). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Lynwood K. Ireland re: need to identify local vet acceptable to DuPont and Mr. Tennant. (Bates No. EID014129, DAW000033). Letter from Ronald R. Potesta (Potesta & Assocaites) to Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: copies of two report one of which discusses an overbite condition in deer. (Bates No. EID007691-EID008012, LKI001274-LKI001305). Interoffice memo from Mark H. Gaston to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weight of Butacite sheeting. (Bates No. EID066196). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: not A69 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 154 of 326 PAGEID #: 40316 ^ 11/4/1998 11/5/1998 11/5/1998 11/5/1998 11/5/1998 11/9/1998 11/11-13/98 11/12/1998 11/12/1998 11/17/1998 11/17/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, recommended that Butacite be landfilled. [Includes interoffice memo from Mark H. Gaston to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weight of Butacite sheeting.] (Bates No. EID066197-EID066199). Letter from Ceil Mancini to Sarah Caspar re: revised work plan for Small Mammal Trapping Investigation. Includes work plan. (Bates No. USFW 0351-USFW 0409). Fax from Kevin Scott (Tetra Tech) to Ralph Stahl transmitting COCs and analytical data summary tables for samples collected 7/22/98. (Bates No. EID000287-EID000303, JMM002887-JMM002903). Memo from Ralph G. Stahl to Rudolph Valentine re: notes of major points from Dry Run Technical Work Group Meeting. (Bates No. USEPA 0860-USEPA 0863). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: call from EPA indicating degradation studies would not be helpful. (Bates No. EID066200-EID066201). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to David E. Overton re: call from EPA indicating degradation studies would not be helpful. (Bates No. EID066202, CF000595). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: Sarah Caspar fell back into step on allowing the collaborative process to play out. (Bates No. EID066203-EID066204, HDR000120-HDR000121). Field Data Sheets from Areas I, II, V, and Ref. Area. Includes letter of transmittal dated 11/23/98. (Bates No. USFW 0424-USFW 0478). Letter from R.L. Ritchey (DuPont) to Barbara Taylor (WVDEP) re: could not determine if attached letter had been sent. Includes September 1998 Monthly Monitoring Report dated 10/14/98. (Bates No. EID001418EID001419, GW003936-GW003937). Letter from Peter G. Moisan to Dr. Paul Ross re: submission of CV for review. (Bates No. EID041588-EID041603, GPS000521-GPS000536). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to 2 addressees re: monitoring well closure. (Bates No. EID014130, DAW000032). Letter from Ellen Rae Herndon (WVDEP) to Roderic E. Moore (Potesta). re: variance request granted for the abandonment of MW-10 and MW-11. (Bates No. EID053058, CF000672). A70 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 155 of 326 PAGEID #: 40317 ~ Vtrillium 11/20/1998 11/24/1998 11/24/1998 11/24/1998 11/24/1998 11/24/1998 11/25/1998 11/25/1998 11/25/1998 11/25/1998 Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to remote addressee re: transmittal of compounds lists. [Includes Group 1: Materials known or suspected to have been sent to Dry Run (dated 8/11/98), Group 1 Appendix: Major monomers and constituents of Group 1 resins (dated 9/1/98), and Group 2: Low and trace volume chemicals of interest (dated 10/14/98)]. (Bates No. EID015162-EID015165, RLR000131RLR000134). Letter from D. Mark Kiser (Potesta & Associates) to Dan Weber re: list of differences between permit drawings and as-constructed conditions. (Bates No. EID031055-EID031057, CF000673-CF000675). Letter from D. Mark Kiser (Potesta) to Gary Klesel re: discussions held with WVDEP concerning well abandonment. Includes letter from Ellen Rae Herndon (WVDEP) to Roderic E. Moore (Potesta) re: variance request granted for the abandonment of MW-10 and MW-11. (Bates No. EID053056-EID053058, CF000670-CF000672). Fax transmission from Paul E. Ross (DuPont) to Peter G. Moisan. Includes "example of Proposal to Consult". (Bates No. EID041585EID041587, GPS000518-GPS000520). Interoffice memo from Larry D. Butler to Kathleen A. Lodge Brennan re: confidential information agreement for Peter G. Moisan. (Bates No. EID041584, GPS000517). Interoffice memo from Kathleen A. Lodge Brennan to Larry D. Butler re: confidential information agreement for Peter G. Moisan. (Bates No. EID041583, GPS000516). Letter from Peter G. Moisan to Dr. Paul Ross re: proposal to provide consulting services for the cattle disease problem. (Bates No. EID041590, GPS000523). Faxed copy of letter from Peter G. Moisan to Dr. Paul Ross re: proposal to provide consulting services for the cattle disease problem. (Bates No. EID017334, LKI001309). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to Isidoros J. Zanikos re: need to move forward with monitoring well closure. (Bates No. EID031058, RAK008753). Interoffice memo from Gary W. Klesel to Robert L. Ritchey re: the 7 existing wells have been closed. (Bates No. EID031059, RAK008752). A71 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 156 of 326 PAGEID #: 40318 ~ Vtrillium 11/30/1998 11/30/1998 12/2/1998 12/3/1998 12/3/1998 12/4/1998 12/8/1998 12/10/1998 12/10/1998 12/15/1998 12/17/1998 Letter from Frank A. Borsuk, Jr. (Potesta) to Mr. Dan Weber (DuPont) re: unable to perform microinvertebrate sampling due to low rainfall. (Bates No. EID001420-EID001421, GW003915-GW003916). Letter from Frank A. Borsuk, Jr. (Potesta) to Mr. Dan Weber (DuPont) re: unable to perform microinvertebrate sampling due to low rainfall. (Bates No. EID030288-EID030289, CF001432-CF001433). Interoffice memo from Larry D. Butler to Kathleen A. Lodge Brennan re: faxed confidential information agreement to Peter G. Moisan for his signature. (Bates No. EID041589, GPS000522). Letter report from Ceil Mancini (Woodward-Clyde) to Sarah Caspar (EPA) re: summarizing the findings of the small mammal trapping investigation. (Bates No. USEPA 1026-USEPA 1039). Summary of Small Mammal Trapping Report from R.L. Ritchey to distribution. [Includes letter report from Ceil Mancini (Woodward-Clyde) to Sarah Caspar (EPA) re: summarizing the findings of the small mammal trapping investigation.] (Bates No. EID040469-EID040476, DDJ000650DDJ000657). Email from Robert L. Ritchey to Ron Potesta re: foam at Dry Run and information to be used to compile "talking points". (Bates No. EID024283-EID024285, EID031990-EID031998, RLR002008RLR002010, RAK006152-RAK006159). Kemron results for one GW Seep Collector Drain collected 11/20/98. Login # L9811381. (Bates No. WVDEP 1277-WVDEP 1288). Attendee list of Dry Run Team meeting. (Bates No. EID041724, GPS000735). Letter report from Peter G. Moisan to Dr. Paul Ross re: preliminary observations from examination of two cattle tapes. (Bates No. EID041721-EID041720, GPS000729, GPS000732-GPS000734). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, November 1998. (Bates No. EID001422-EID001436, GW003918-GW003932). Letter from Laidley E. McCoy (Potesta) to Mid Ohio Valley Health Department re: FOIA request. (Bates No. EID000486, CF000474). A72 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 157 of 326 PAGEID #: 40319 ^ 12/17/1998 12/22/1998 12/22/1998 1999 1/4/1999 1/5/1999 1/5/1999 1/6/1999 1/13/1999 1/13/1999 1/18/1999 1/20/1999 1/20/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, Letter from Laidley E. McCoy (Potesta). to Mr. Russel Rader (Office of Env. Health). re: FOIA request. (Bates No. EID000488, CF000476). Letter from William S. Herold, Jr., to Laidley E. McCoy re: response of FOIA request. (Bates No. EID000489, CF000477). Letter from Gary Hamilton to Laidley E. McCoy re: response of FOIA request. (Bates No. EID000487, CF000475). Dry Run Landfill: C-8 Summary. (Bates No. EID066094, ASH000144). Memo from Paul E. Ross (DuPont) to Mark D. Sprenger (USEPA/ERT) re: examined 45 slides and found no gross abnormalities in the small mammals trap on the site. (Bates No. USEPA 1040-USEPA 1041). Email from Chuck Anderson to George Woytowich re: fluoride results (Bates No. EID037707, JMM007772). Letter from Peter G. Moisan, DVM to Dr. Paul Ross re: comments on two laboratory reports from cattle examined at the Ohio Department of Agriculture and the Michigan State University Animal Health Diagnostic Laboratory and the list of materials disposed of at Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID041744-EID041745, GPS000755-GPS000756). Email from Georg Woytowich to Robert L. Ritchey. Forwarded email from Chuck Anderson to George Woytowich re: fluoride results [Same as 01/05/99 document above] (Bates No. EID037707, JMM007772). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, December 1998. [No samples taken] (Bates No. EID001437, GW003914). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Jon F. Moore re: high solids visible in stream. (Bates No. EID030784, JFM0000400). Call to Ralph Stahl (connected in Rudy Valentine and Paul Russ). re: 1) update on project, 2) cattle team, 3) EPA and mapping "hot-spots" of on site chemicals, 4) EPA and deer study, 5) strategy team meeting. (Bates No. EID017486-EID017488, RLR000041-RLR000043). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID001438-EID001457). Memo from Mark Huston to Mark D. Sprenger and Michael Horne re: white tail deer samples. (Bates No. USFW 0573-USFW 0578). A73 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 158 of 326 PAGEID #: 40320 1/20/1999 1/20/1999 1/22/1999 1/24/1999 1/28/1999 1/28/1999 1/28/1999 1/28/1999 1/28/1999 1/29/1999 2/2/1999 Email from Sarah Caspar to Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. re: sampling of Tennant's cattle and deer harvesting. (Bates No. EID017337, RLR001863). Forwarded email from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to Paul Ross, Ritcherl, and Valent. Email from Sarah Caspar to Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. dated 1/20/99 re: sampling of Tennant's cattle and deer harvesting. (Bates No. EID017337, RLR001863). Interoffice Memo from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to distribution re: minutes of meeting held on 12/10/98. (Bates No. EID040480-EID040482). Email from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to DuPont personnel re: symptoms in Mr. Tennant's cattle. (Bates No. EID045552). 1998 Dry Run Landfill Operational Report. Includes letter from R.L. Ritchey to Barbara S. Taylor. (Bates No. WVDEP 1300-WVDEP-1305). Letter report from Charles Anderson (NCSU) to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: fluoride results in Bermuda grass. [Includes interoffice memo transmitting data.] (Bates No. EID048277-EID048278, CF03983CF003984). Letter report form Charles E. Anderson, Ph. D. to George Woytowich re: fluoride in Bermuda grasses collected from Dry Run landfill. [Includes DuPont transmittal memo] (Bates No. EID017357-EID017358, DDJ000684-DDJ000685). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to Barbara S. Taylor re: request permit modification. [Includes signed certification and copy of $500 check.] (Bates No. EID000483-EID000485, EID000490, CF000471-CF000473, CF000478). DuPont contract order with Peter G. Moisan. [Includes letters form Peter G. Moisan dated 11/25/98, 1/7/99, and 1/19/99, and executed confidentially agreement. (Bates No. EID067719- EID067730). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Daniel A. Weber and Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: using water from containment pond for dust control. (Bates No. EID039385, TRW000984). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution list re: EPA's request for analytical information on streams going to WWTP and the biosolids that are landfilled at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID024444, HDR000107). A74 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 159 of 326 PAGEID #: 40321 2/2/1999 2/5/1999 2/11/1999 2/12/1999 2/12/1999 2/15/1999 2/18/1999 2/19/1999 2/22/1999 2/24/1999 Mar-99 3/1/1999 3/1/1999 Interoffice memo from Jon F. Moore to Daniel Weber re: meeting iron and aluminum discharge limits. (Bates No. EID053082, LKI001608). Email from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to distribution re: kick off meeting for the cattle expert team. (Bates No. EID067489, HDR001160). Letter from Mavis L. Lucas (WVDEP) to R.L. Ritchey re: papers constituting a modification application for NPDES permit. (Bates No. EID000494-EID000497, CF000466-CF000470). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, January 1999. Includes bioassay report. (Bates No. WVDEP 1306-WVDEP 1322). Interoffice memo from Lou Bedekovich to 4 addressees re: disposal of wastes directly to landfill. (Bates No. EID039368, TRW000967). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Jon F. Moore and Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: January monitoring results. (Bates No. EID053091, JFM000418). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to Office of Water Resources re: copies of completed forms requested in letter dated February 11, 1999. (Bates No. EID000498-EID000510). Washington Works Semi-annual Stormwater Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill: Permit WV0076244. (Bates No. EID001486-EID001553). Interoffice memo from Rudolph Valentine to Robert L. Ritchey re: Greg Syke's involvement in cattle issue. (Bates No. EID042165, GPS000977). Email from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to H. David Ramsey re: location of Stream Sampling Point No. 1. (Bates No. EID058055-HDR001161). March 1999 Environmental Performance Summary Historical Regulatory Exceedances and Reportable Releases. (Bates No. EID067438, CF004502). Interoffice memo from Lou Bedekovich to Hayden E. Lancaster re: waste disposal. (Bates No. EID039367, TRW000966). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to H. David Ramsey, Jr., Robert L. Ritchey and Greg P. Sykes re: availability of Dr. Lisa Davis Heller for cattle team meeting. (Bates No. EID017359, HDR000027). A75 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 160 of 326 PAGEID #: 40322 3/1/1999 3/8/1999 3/8/1999 3/8/1999 3/8/1999 3/9/1999 3/9/1999 3/9/1999 3/9/1999 3/11/1999 3/12/1999 3/12/1999 Letter report from Frank A. Borsuk, Jr., Ph.D (Potesta) to Daniel Weber (DuPont) re: summary of field activities and associated lab analyses for samples collected January 27, 1999. [Includes COC and results for alkalinity and hardness] (Bates No. EID053098-EID053103, JFM000184JFM000189). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 1999. (Bates No. EID001554-EID001563, GW003558-GW003567). Email from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey re: phone call to John Britvec concerning permitting and the installation of the leachate collection system. (Bates No. EID021613, RLR002124). Interoffice memo from Andrew S. Hartten to Robert L. Ritchey re: RFI groundwater data. (Bates No. EID071080, AC002583). Email from Hayden E. Lancaster to Mike E. Goodwin re: new waste disposal procedures. (Bates No. EID070325-EID070326, AC002420AC002421). Email from Hayden E. Lancaster to Thomas R. Waldron re: waste disposal. (Bates No. EID070325-EID070326, AC002420-AC002421). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Benthic Macroinvertebrate Survey: August 1998. Includes copy of monthly monitoring report for January 1999 and biosassay report. (Bates No. EID001564-EID001587, CF002904-CF002927). Cattle Team Kickoff Meeting Summary (EID042172-EID042175, GPS000986-GPS000989). List of Problems and Differential Diagnoses for the Tenant Farm. (Bates No. EID042188-EID042189, GPS001003-GPS001004). Email from James A. Dyer to Richard A. Kirschner re: Fe and Lal levels in leachate pond. (Bates No. EID053113-EID053115, RAK008561RAK008563). Email from Richard A. Kirschner to James A. Dyer re: Fe and Al levels in leachate pond. (Bates No. EID053116, RAK008564). Email from Richard A. Kirschner to James A. Dyer re: waste streams going to landfill are inert plastic wastes from the plant, scrap metal, wood A76 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 161 of 326 PAGEID #: 40323 ^ 3/12/1999 3/15/1999 3/15/1999 3/16/1999 3/16/1999 3/22/1999 3/23/1999 3/23/1999 3/23/1999 3/24/1999 3/25/1999 3/26/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, etc. that can't be reclaimed. (Bates No. EID053118, RAK008566). Email from James A. Dyer to Richard A. Kirschner re: Fe and Al levels in leachate pond. (Bates No. EID053117, RAK008565). Interoffice memo from Greg P. Sykes to Patrick J. Haley and Paul C. Meunier re: meeting with EPA regarding Dry Run landfill and cattle cases (EID042184-EID042185, GPS000999-GPS001000). Application Request for Approval for Phases II-Leachate Collection System includes interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to W. David Shoaf and Daniel A. Weber. (EID005062- EID005078, JFM000448-JFM000464). Memo from Bob Ritchey to Roger Zipfel, Tony Playtis, John Migliore, Alison Crane, and Dan Weber re: second round of results expected shortly. (Bates No. EID071079, AC002582). Email from James A. Dyer to Richard A. Kirschner re: discussion of Fe and Al concerns. (Bates No. EID053133, RAK008567). Interoffice memo from Richard a. Kirschner to distribution re: meeting to discuss now permitting limits. (Bates No. EID039359, TRW000954). Interoffice memo from Bharat O. Desai to distribution re: potential options for permit compliance at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID030797EID030798, RAK000111-RAK000112). Email from Greg P. Sykes to distribution re: cattle team meeting minutes. (Bates No. EID017367-EID017368, RLR001941-RLR001942). Email from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: phone call with John Britvec (WVOWM) concerning Fe and Al discharge limits (Bates No. EID037701, JMM007766). Interoffice memo from Daniel Weber to Jon F. Moore re: water acceptable for use for dust control. (Bates No. EID01868, DAW000014). Interoffice memo from J. Bart Ruiter to Dan Weber re: if discharge strictly stormwater would limits be applied to discharge. (Bates No. EID053147-EID053148, JFM000481-JFM000482). Email from J. Bart Ruiter to Bharat O. Desai re: discharge limits for Fe and Al. (Bates No. EID030802-EID030804, RAK000094-RAK000096). A77 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 162 of 326 PAGEID #: 40324 3/29/1999 3/29/1999 3/29/1999 3/30/1999 3/30/1999 3/31/1999 3/31/1999 4/6/1999 4/6/1999 4/7/1999 4/7/1999 Report prepared by Protesta & Associates for DuPont Washington Works. Monitoring Wells MW-1, MW-1A, MW-4, MW-4A, MW-6, MW-10, and MW-11 Abandonment Report . (Bates No. EID030290-EID030322, CF002863-CF002895). Analytical information requested by EPA on the wastewater streams which feed into the WWTP and the resulting biosolids. [Includes letter from Robert Ritchey (DuPont) to Sarah Caspar (EPA). discussing dates biosolids were landfilled in Dry Run.] (Bates No. EID009452EID009469, RLR000004-RLR000021). Potesta Monitoring Well MW-15 Installation Report Dry Run Landfill DuPont Washington Works, prepared for DuPont Washington Works, Project No. 98016. (Bates No. EID030323-EID030341, CF002844CF002862). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) to Richard a. Kirschner, Jr. re: visit from Sarah Caspar to obtain split sample of biopond filter cake and the wasterwaster stream that feeds the filter press. (Bates No. EID017371-EID017372, RLR000002-RLR000003). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1998. (Revised quarterly well report forms). (Bates No. WVDEP 1357-WVDEP 1363). Fax transmission from Sarah L. Caspar to Robert Ritchie re: list of analytical parameters. (Bates No. 000342, RLR000456). Email from James A. Dyer to Richard A. Kirschner re: dissolved Fe and Al. (Bates No. EID030805-EID030806, RAK000092-RAK000093). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, First Quarter 1999. (Bates No. WVDEP 1418-WVDEP 1428). Terms and Conditions from DuPont to Saint Marys Veterinary Clinic (attn: Dr. Lisa Davis-Heller).; Contract Order No. LPW5135. (Bates No. EID067666-EID067668). Interoffice memo from Dawn Jackson to distribution re: standby statement and questions and answers in anticipation of media contact due to EPA site visits. (Bates No. EID063144-EID063151, HDR000007HDR000014). Email from Robert Ritchey to distribution re: visit by EPA to plant went A78 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 163 of 326 PAGEID #: 40325 ^ 4/9/1999 4/9/1999 4/9/1999 4/10/1999 4/12/1999 4/13/1999 4/14/1999 4/14/1999 4/15/1999 4/15/1999 4/16/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, well. EPA meeting with cattle vets at Tennant farm to prepare for planned cattle testing. (Bates No. EID017377, HDR000022). Memo from Greg P. Sykes to 6 addressees, report of Dry Run site visit, April 8-9,1999. (Bates No. EID042206-EID0042208, GPS001021GPS001023). Notes of phone conversation with Dr. Heller. (Bates No. EID017379EID017381, RLR000447-RLR000449). Email from Robert Ritchey to distribution re: phone conversation with Dr. Heller (cattle team) discussing the visit from Dr. Heller's perspective and deer harvest. (Bates No. EID017384-EID017385). Email from Greg P. Sykes to distribution. Trip Report: Dry Run Visit by the Cattle Team on April 7 & 8, 1999. (Bates No. EID017390EID017391, RLR001937-RLR001938). Letter from Barbara Taylor (WVDEP) to R.L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: Modification No. 1 of NPDES Permit. (Bates No. EID000516EID000524, CF000441-CF000449). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, First Quarter 1999. (Bates No. WVDEP 1429-WVDEP 1444). Email from Greg P. Sykes to Sarah Caspar and Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. Forwarded Trip Report: Dry Run Visit by the Cattle Team on April 7 & 8, 1999. (Bates No. EID017389-EID017391, RLR001936-RLR001938). Email from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to distribution re: results and "final" conclusion of Tennant's herd available in 2-4 weeks. Forwarded Trip Report: Dry Run Visit by the Cattle Team on April 7 & 8, 1999. (Bates No. EID017389-EID017391, RLR001936-RLR001938). Email memo from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to Robert L. Ritchey, minutes from Cattle Team Meeting, March 9, 1999. (Bates No. EID017398EID017401, RLR001931 -RLR001931). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: discussions concerning high pH in Dry Run Landfill lower pond. (Bates No. EID030807-EID030808, RAK000082-RAK000083). Email from Dawn D. Jackson to distribution re: standby statement which incorporates upgrades. (Bates No. EID058072-EID058075, A79 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 164 of 326 PAGEID #: 40326 ^ 4/16/1999 4/19/1999 4/20/1999 4/20/1999 4/26/1999 4/29/1999 5/7/1999 5/11/1999 5/19/1999 5/25/1999 5/25/1999 5/27/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, HDR001193-HDR001196). Standby statement. Same as text from above email. (Bates No. EID063152-EID063158, DDJ000676-DJD000682). Email from Bharat O. Desai to Daniel A. Weber re: high pH will precipitate out metals. (Bates No. EID058076, HDR001197). Email from Richard A. Kirschner to Bharat O. Desai re: mixed pond water and leachate water in 40/60 ratio to ensure that both TSS and Fe/Al were present for the filtration study. (Bates No. EID030813, RAK000078). Email from Bharat O. Desai to Richard A. Kirschner re: filtration will remove iron. (Bates No. EID030812, RAK000079). Letter from D. Mark Kiser (Potesta) to Richard Kirschner (DuPont) re: repairs to made at the lower pond of the landfill. (Bates No. EID015940EID015942, RAK007823-RAK007825). Email from Ralph Stahl, Jr. to Robert Ritchey re: cattle team involvement in deer harvest. (Bates No. EID037693-EID037694, JMM007725JMM007726). Email from Chuck Anderson (NCSU).to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: fluoride method to be used for grasses. [Email message forwarded to Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) by George Woytowich (DuPont)] (Bates EID017403-EID017404, RLR000441-RLR000442). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, April 1999. (Bates No. EID001652-EID00161661, GW006377-GW006386). Roy F. Weston Analytical Report for samples collected 4/7/99. (Bates No. EID030353-EID030400, RLR000350-RLR000395). Interoffice memo from Bharat O. Desai to Richard A. Kirschner re: TSS , Al, and Fe results for the filtration test on landfill leachate. (Bates No. EID039318-EID039320, TRW000908-TRW000910). Email from Chris E. Shoop to Anil Shahak re: solid waste must have no free liquids. Supersacks must be liquid free. (Bates No. EID070368, AC002463). Email from Richard A. Kirschner to Bharat E. Desai re: sample collection A80 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 165 of 326 PAGEID #: 40327 5/27/1999 6/1/1999 6/2/1999 6/4/1999 6/4/1999 6/11/1999 6/16/1999 6/16/1999 6/17/1999 6/21/1999 ~ Vt r il l iu m for filtration study. (Bates No. EID070182, JFM000763). Email from Bharat E. Desai to Richard A. Kirschner re: rental for field filtration unit. (Bates No. EID070183, JFM000764). Analytical results for split sludge samples collected 4/7/99. [Includes cover letter from R.L. Ritchey (DuPont) to Sarah L. Caspar (EPA). (Bates No. USEPA 1059-USEPA 1080). Email from Alison a. Crane to Janet Y. Villers re: confirmation the TE7043, TE9423, TE9423D, and FPD9382 do not contain C-8. (Bates No. EID070369, AC002464). Email memo from Dr. Perry Habecker to Greg P. Sykes forwarded email from Sarah Caspar to Perry Habecker discussing fluorides in animal tissues (Bates No. EID042282, GPS001103). Email memo from Dr. Perry Habecker to Greg P. Sykes forwarded email from Dr. Robert Poppenga re: response to Sarah Caspar email on fluorides.(Bates No. EID042283, GPS001104). Tennant Farm Herd Health Investigation: Cattle Team Data Workbook. [Includes Herd Investigation Report (dated 4/18/99), pathology reports, copied photographs, Draft Report Dry Run Creek (dated 11/97), veterinary pathology report (dated 12/22/97), letter report of Small Mammal Trapping Effort (dated 12/3/98)]. (Bates No. EID042286EID042287, GPS001107-GPS001108, DUP 002-DUP 240). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, May 1999. [Includes bioassay report.] (Bates No. WVDEP 1499-WVDEP 1514). Washington Works-NPDES Permit WV0001279 Monthly Monitoring Report for May 1999. [Includes bioassay report.] (Bates No. EID001684EID001740, GW006217-GW006273). Standby statement to be used in the event of media inquiries. DuPont has received a "Notice of Intent to Sue" regarding Dry Run Landfill. Confident that the site does not present any risk to the community. (Bates No. EID067514, HDR001202). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Second Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023272-EID023282, CF002805-CF002815). A81 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 166 of 326 PAGEID #: 40328 ^ 6/24/1999 6/24/1999 6/24/1999 7/1/1999 7/1/1999 7/1/1999 7/2/1999 7/14/1999 7/14/1999 7/14/1999 7/14/1999 7/15/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, Email from Robert L. Ritchey to DuPont personnel re: F11 detected slightly above MDL and acrolein detected at 1.99 ppm. Concerned that EPA will maintain their focus on F11. (Bates No. EID030828, RLR001884). Email from Alison A. Crane to Louis J. Bedekovich re: cleanup in diesel tank, sandblasting, and paint and solvent storage areas. (Bates No. EID070406, AC002503). Email from Michael D. Aucoin to Robert L. Ritchey re: detection of acrolein at 1.99 ppm not significant since RBS is 1600 mg/kg. (Bates No. EID030828, RLR001884). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244. Quarterly Leachate Analysis Report, Second Quarter 1999. (Bates No. WVDEP 1515-WVDEP 1521). Press Release Draft: detailed version #1, DuPont Washington Works: Dry Run Landfill Civil Action. (Bates No. EID067503, HDR000531). Press Release Draft: short version #1, DuPont Washington Works: Dry Run Landfill Civil Action. (Bates No. EID067504, HDR000532). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Second Quarter 1999. (Bates No. WVDEP 1522-WVDEP 1531). Interoffice memo from Greg P. Sykes to 6 addressees re: Dry Run Litigation Record hold order. (Bates No. EID042293-EID042294, GPS001124-GPS001125). Email from Greg P. Sykes to 6 addressees re: Dry Run Litigation Record hold order. (Bates No. EID042295-EID042296, GPS001126GPS001127). Interoffice memo from Greg P. Sykes to Patrick J. Haley re: FYI-Dry Run Litigation Record Hold Order. (Bates NO. EID042297, GPS001128). Interoffice memo from Greg P. Sykes to 4 addressees re: apology to Mike for error in name. (Bates No. EID042298, GPS001129). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, June 1999. No samples taken. (Bates No. EID001759EID001767, GW006321-GW006329). A82 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 167 of 326 PAGEID #: 40329 ,, 7/16/1999 7/20/1999 7/20/1999 7/22/1999 7/27/1999 7/29/1999 7/30/1999 8/4/1999 8/4/1999 8/9/1999 8/12/1999 8/13/1999 ~ Vt r il l iu m Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Quarterly Pond Underdrain Analysis Report, Second Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID001786-EID001769). Email from Daniel Weber to John M. Migliore (DuPont); forwarded email from Ralph Stahl, Jr. to Robert Ritchey [dated 4/29/99] re: cattle team involvement in deer harvest. (Bates No. EID037693-EID037694, JMM007725-JMM007726). Email from Bharat O. Desai (DuPont) to Richard A. Kirschner (DuPont) re: sample shipment to Oberlin for analysis. (Bates No. EID030830, RAK000004). Email from Bharat O. Desai (DuPont) to Richard A. Kirschner re: keep leachate out of pond at this time and discussion of sample to be submitted to Oberlin for testing. (Bates No. EID030831, RAK000002). Email from George Woytowich to distribution re: Annual Vegetation Survey by Dr. Charles Anderson. (Bates No. EID070260, LKI001749). Proposed agenda for EPA/DuPont Cattle Team Meeting. (Bates No. EID042303, GPS001134). Email from Robert L. Ritchey to Ralph G. Stahl re: speaking with Dr. Moisan concerning his vegetation survey efforts and his input to cattle team. (Bates No. EID017410, RLR000340). Email from Daniel Weber to Robert Ritchey. Forwarded email from Chuck Anderson to George Woytowich re: fluoride results (Bates No. EID037707, JMM007772). Letter report form Charles Anderson re: results of vegetation survey performed on July 19-20, 1999. [Includes tables of observations and DuPont interoffice memo dated 8/11/99 transmitting information] (Bates No. EID048261-EID0048276, CF003967-CF003982). Email from Dr. Perry Habecker to Sarah Caspar re: preliminary report of cattle team study. (Bates No. DUP 001). Email memo from Greg P. Sykes to 6 addressees re: responding to specific questions should be avoided until report is final (Bates No. EID042321-EID042321, GPS001158-GPS001159). Email memo from Greg P. Sykes to Patrick H. Haley & James A. Popp re: brief chronology of cattle team activities. (Bates No. EID042323- A83 02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 168 of 326 PAGEID #: 40330 8/13/1999 8/13/1999 8/13/1999 8/18/1999 8/18/1999 8/24/1999 8/25/1999 8/31/1999 9/3/1999 9/8/1999 EID042324, GPS001161-GPS001162). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, July 1999. No samples taken. (Bates No. EID001770EID001778, GW006573-GW006580). Email memo from Sarah Caspar to Greg P. Sykes re: may be jumping to conclusions on the cause of cattle problems. (Bates No. EID042325EID042326, GPS001163-GPS001164). Interoffice memo from Dr. Perry Habecker (U Penn). to Peter Moisan, Lisa Davis-Heller, Greg P. Sykes (DuPont), Bob Poppenga (U Penn)., and Bob Munson (U Penn). re: contact with Mr. Tennant is to be through attorney. Any contact from Mr. Billott should be through DuPont counsel. (Bates No. EID042328, GPS001166). Email from Jon F. Moore (DuPont) to Lynwood K. Ireland (DuPont) and Dawn D. Jackson (DuPont) re: per DNR loss of hair in deer attributable to ring worm. (Bates No. EID008500, RLR001911). Email from Jon F. Moore (DuPont) to Lynwood K. Ireland (DuPont) and Dawn D. Jackson (DuPont) re: per DNR loss of hair in deer attributable to ring worm. [Same as above document] (Bates No. EID070261, LKI001756). Letter report from Frank Borsuk, Jr., (Protesta) to Jay S. DeBee (DuPont) re: Benthic Macroinvertebrate Surveys. (Bates No. EID037889EID037897, SDB002981-SDB002989). Email memo from Ralph G. Stahl, Jr. to 10 addressees re: final report of cattle team study. (Bates No. EID042330, GPS001168). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to Barbara Taylor re: transmission of benthic macroinbertebrate survey, and no sample was collected from Dry Run Creek due to no flow conditions. [Report same as 8/24/99 above] (Bates No. EID001779-EID001788, CF000036-CF000045). Email from Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) to DuPont personnel re: per Cindy Musser fetal deer brought into to DNR office had yellow toenails. (Bates No. EID008024, RLR001983). Letter to Dr. Edward M Snyder (WV Environmental Quality Board). re: Water Quality Standards-aluminum criterion. (Bates No. EID009587EID009595, WCA000001-WCA00009). A84 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 169 of 326 PAGEID #: 40331 9/13/1999 9/16/1999 9/18/1999 9/20/1999 9/21/1999 9/24/1999 9/24/1999 9/27/1999 9/27/1999 9/27/1999 9/27/1999 10/1/1999 Letter to Dr. Edward M Snyder (WV Environmental Quality Board). re: Water Quality Standards-iron criterion. (Bates No. EID009596EID009601, WCA000010-WCA000015). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, August 1999. (Bates No. EID001789-EID001798, CF003386-CF003382). Interoffice memo from David W. Johnson to distribution re: list of flowers recommended for the landfill area. (Bates No. EID070707-EID070708, RJZ000039-RJZ000040). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, September 1999. No samples taken. (Bates No. WVDEP 1559-WVDEP 1565). Email from Geroge Woytowich to Chris E. Shoop re: waste material should not be sent to Dry Run in steel drums. (Bates No. EID070269, GW007067). Email from George Woytowich to Chris E. Shoop re: sending calcium sulfate to Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID070376, AC002473). Email from George Woytowich to Chris E. Shoop and Thomas R. Waldron re: disposal of CaSO4 to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070292, GW007090). Email from Alison A. Crane to George Woytowich re: reservations about sending calcium sulfate to Dry Run due to references to cobaltous chloride on MSDS. (Bates No. EID070377, AC002474). Email from Chris E. Shoop to Bryan P. Sautter, Tammie L. Zoller, and Alison A. Crane re: actions to be taken to resolve CaSO4 disposal issues. (Bates No. EID070378-EID070379, AC002475-AC002476). Email from Bryan P. Sautter to Chris E. Shoop re: CaSO4 to be landfilled does not contain cobaltous chloride. (Bates No. EID070380, AC002477). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Benzene analysis (Bates No. EID001801-EID001802, CF000012-CF000013). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244. Quarterly Leachate Analysis Report, Third Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID001803-EID001809). A85 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 170 of 326 PAGEID #: 40332 ~ Vt r il l iu m 10/1/1999 10/1/1999 10/4/1999 10/4/1999 10/4/1999 10/4/1999 10/4/1999 10/4/1999 10/5/1999 10/6/1999 10/6/1999 10/11/1999 Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Third Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023283-EID023293, CF002773-CF002793). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Quarterly Pond Underdrain Analysis Report, Third Quarter 1999. (Bates No. WVDEP 1541-WVDEP 1542 Memo from Ceil Mancini and Don spires (URS GreinerWoodward Clyde) to Ralph Stahl (DuPont) re: results of evaluation of staining in shrew teeth. (Bates No. EID046617-EID046618, RGS000018-RGS000019). Email from Alison A. Crane to Margaret H. Mellon re: landfill disposal of materials goes through George Woytowich and Tom Waldron. (Bates No. EID070381, AC002478). Email from Chris E. Shoop to Robert F. Pinchot re: disposal of scrubber packing rings in Dry Run OK since they are rinsed with water for 8 hrs. and C-8 would have been removed. (Bates No. EID070409, AC002506). Email from Chris E. Shoop to Robert F. Pinchot re: disposal of scrubber packing rings in Dry Run OK since they are rinsed with water for 8 hrs. and C-8 would have been removed. [Same as document listed above.] (Bates No. EID070409, AC002506). Email from Robert F. Pinchot to Chris E. Shoop re: presence/absence of C-8 on scrubber packing rings and their disposal. (Bates No. EID070710, AC002507). Email from Chris E. Shoop to James W. Hunt and Alison A. Crane re: question of washing rings may not remove all of the C-8. Email from Greg P. Sykes (DuPont) to distribution re: preparation of Dry Run report. (Bates No. DUP 241). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Third Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023304-EID023360). Email from Roger J. Zipfel to Chris Shoop re: essentially no C-8 in packing due to high oven temperature. (Bates No. EID070710EID070711, RJZ000042-RJZ000043). Email from George Waytowich to Thomas R. Waldron re: list of Teflon products that can be landfilled in Dry Run. (Bates No. EID021604- A86 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 171 of 326 PAGEID #: 40333 10/13/1999 10/14/1999 10/14/1999 10/15/1999 10/15/1999 11/1/1999 11/1/1999 11/5/1999 11/8/1999 11/12/1999 11/16/1999 11/17/1999 ~ Vt r il l iu m EID021605, GWK000011-GWK000012). Email from Chris E. Shoop to George Woytowich and Robert F. Pinchot re: disposal of FEP HF Scrubber Packing Material sent to Dry Run to due C-8 ND (<0.5 ppm). (Bates No. EID070384, AC002481). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: are issues in attached memo being addressed. [Includes interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: monitoring well maintenance/issue list.] (Bates No. EID024360-EID024361). Email memo from F. Neal Schrick to Greg P. Sykes re: cattle prolactin values (Bates No. EID042339, GPS001177). Email from Pat Lane (DuPont) to Scott DeBee and George Woytowich (DuPont) re: elevated fecal coliform result. (Bates No. EID046062, JFM000637). Email from Pat Lane to Scott DeBee re: fecal coliform results. (Bates No. EID070195, JFM000790). Email from M. Therese Zotti (DuPont) to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: product for disposal in Dry Run. (Bates No. EID044951, GW007058). Email from M. Therese Zotti (DuPont) to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: product for disposal in Dry Run. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070293, GW007091). Email from George Woytowich (DuPont) to M. Therese Zotti (DuPont) re: material cited as non-hazardous water may not be landfilled at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID044951, GW007058). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1999. (Bates No. WVDEP 1566-WVDEP 1575). Email from Pat Lane to George Woytowich re: attached field sheets. (Bates No. EID070286, GW007084). Correction of Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, October 1999. (Bates No. EID001850EID001852, CF003871-CF003873). Email from George Woytowich (DuPont) to Patricia Demaio (DuPont) re: material for disposal in Dry Run. (Bates No. EID044952, GW007059). A87 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 172 of 326 PAGEID #: 40334 ^ 11/17/1999 11/17/1999 11/18/1999 12/2/1999 12/2/1999 12/14/1999 12/16/1999 12/20/1999 12/23/1999 12/31/1999 1/4/2000 1/4/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, Email from George Woytowich (DuPont) to Patricia Demaio (DuPont) re: material for disposal in Dry Run. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070295, GW007093). Email from George Woytowich (DuPont) to Patricia Demaio (DuPont) re: material for disposal in Dry Run. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070198, JFM000793). Email from Alison A. Crane to Michelle M. Dixon re: Butacite dye bags OK for landfill as long as they are completely empty. (Bates No. EID070358, AC002453). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to Barbara Taylor re: attempts to perform benthic macroinvertebrate survey unsuccessful. (Bates No. EID048348EID048350, CF004054-CF004056). Acute Toxicity Bioassay Report, Job #: 1299-9911899. (Bates No. EID067698-EID067704, EID067718, SDB003256-SDB003262, SDB003276). Email from Wayne C. Appleton (DuPont) to R Gensemer (ENSR) re: requesting copy of paper on aluminum toxicity. (Bates No. EID009602, WCA000016). Kemron results for Outlet 001 collected 11/29/99. (Bates No. EID067705-067717, SDB003263-SDB003275). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, November 1999. Includes bioassay report. (Bates No. EID001853-EID001866, CF003875-CF003888). Tennant Farm Herd Health Investigation Cattle Team Report (Bates No. DUP 242-DUP-362). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Fourth Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID048337-EID048347, CF004043-CF004053). Email from Alison A. Crane to Charles T. Abel re: coal ash stored at Ravenswood to be sent to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070359, AC002454). Email from Alison A. Crane to Charles T. Abel re: coal ash stored at Ravenswood to be sent to Dry Run. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070385, AC002482). A88 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 173 of 326 PAGEID #: 40335 ^ 1/4/2000 1/7/2000 1/7/2000 1/14/2000 1/14/2000 1/20/2000 1/21/2000 1/21/2000 1/25/2000 1/25/2000 1/31/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, Email from Alison A. Crane to Charles T. Abel re: coal ash stored at Ravenswood to be sent to Dry Run. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070297, GW007095). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023361-EID023371). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Fourth Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023294-EID023303; SDB003291-SDB003300). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, Quarterly Pond Underdrain Analysis Report, Third Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023372-EID023374). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244. Quarterly Leachate Analysis Report, Fourth Quarter 1999. (Bates No. EID023375-EID023382). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, December 1999. (Bates No. EID037172-EID037183, SDB 003315-SDB003326). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Semi-annual Stormwater Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV076244. (Bates No. EDI067355-EID067385; SDB003391-SDB003421). Washington Works Monitoring Report, Semi-annual Stormwater Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV076244. Includes Groundwater Sampling Field Data Sheets and tabulated results. (Bates No. EID037779- EID037810, CF004089CF004120; EID045943EID045952, SDB002854-SDB002863; EDI045953-EID045978, SDB002864-SDB002888). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to William D. Brannon re: request reduction in frequency of effluent toxicity testing. (Bates No. EID048324EID048325,CF004030-CF004031). Letter from R.L. Ritchey to William D. Brannon re: request reduction in frequency of effluent toxicity testing. (Bates No. EID067349, SDB003361). Email from Dawn Jackson to DuPont personnel re: local DNR representative inquired about results of study performed on deer. (Bates No. EID066063, RP000135). A89 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 174 of 326 PAGEID #: 40336 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 1/31/2000 2/1/2000 2/3/2000 3/7/2000 3/10/2000 3/13/2000 3/15/2000 3/15/2000 3/29/2000 3/29/2000 3/30/2000 4/5/2000 4/6/2000 1999 Annual Landfill Report. Permit WV0076244. Includes cover letter from R.L. Ritchey to William D. Brannon. (Bates No. EID037768EID037776, CF004079-CF004087). Email from Robert Ritchey to DuPont personnel re: request for cattle and small animal reports (Bates No. EID037697, JMM007758). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, January 2000. (Bates No. EID037184-EID037216, SDB002890-SDB002922). Letter from Allyn Turner (WVDEP) to R.L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: request to conduct whole effluent toxicity testing on an annual basis is acceptable. (Bates No. EID067350, SDB003362). Email from J. Scott DeBee to Dawn Marshall re: list of samples commonly run at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070201, JFM000796). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, February 2000. (Bates No. EID066987-EID066997). Letter from Dawn Jackson to Mr. Cyril Graham re: copy of cattle study. (Bates No. EID070314, DDJ001520). Letter from Dawn Jackson to Mr. Robert C. Wigal re: copy of cattle study. (Bates No. EID070315, DDJ001521). Washington Works Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244 Quarterly Leachate Analysis Report First Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID067402-EID067414, CF004630-CF004642). Kemron results for samples received 1/10/00. (Bates No. EID06386EID067401, SDB003447-SDB003462). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results 1st Quarter 2000 (Bates No. EID067416-EID067426, CF004604CF004614). Washington Works Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244 Quarterly Pond Underdrain Analysis Report First Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID067020-EID067023). Washington Works - GW sampling (quarterly) Dry Run Landfill (Bates No. EID067542-EID068543). A90 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 175 of 326 PAGEID #: 40337 4/12/2000 4/14/2000 4/20/2000 4/26/2000 5/16/2000 5/30/2000 6/8/2000 6/23/2000 6/27/2000 6/29/2000 6/30/2000 6/30/2000 6/30/2000 Washington Works Monitoring Groundwater Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, 1st Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID003934EID023942, JMM004525-JMM004533). Washington Works, Monthly Monitoring Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, March 2000. (Bates No. EID067009-EID067019). Email from Bharat O. Desai to George Woytowich re: Al exceedance due to naturally occurring condition. (Bates No. EID070320, RLR002140). Email from Thomas R. Woldron to Jon F. Moore, Lynwood K. Ireland, and Robert L. Ritchey re: complaint of odor coming from Dry Run Landfill by Tenants. (Bates No. EID070319, RLR002139). News Release 3M Phasing Out Some if its Specialty Materials. Email from George Woytowich to Bharat O. Desai re: lower pond put into service in Oct. 98. However, no discharge from Outlet 001 in October, November, and December 1998. (Bates No. EID070204, JFM000803). Email from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland re: location of well at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070205, JFM000804). Letter from Gerald L. Kennedy to Dr. Charles M. Auer re: DuPont's uses of APFO. Includes Voluntary Use and Exposure Information Profile. (Bates No. EID070482-EIDEID070492). Letter from R.L. Ritchey (DuPont) to Allyn G. Turner (WVDEP) re: fecal coliform permit exceedance. (Bates No. EID070590-EID070591). Suggested draft letter from R.L.Ritchey to Allyn Turner (OWR) re: Benthic Macroinvertebrate Survey: May 2000. [No report attached. Fax transmission cover pages included.] (Bates No. EID070265-EID070268, GW007063-GW007066). Interoffice memo from George Woytowich to Thomas R. Waldron re: cover crushed bins with fly ash to fill in voids. (Bates No. EID070989, TRW001518). Interoffice memo from George Woytowich to Thomas R. Waldron re: cover crushed bins with fly ash to fill in voids. [Same as above document.] (Bates No. EID070206, JFM000805). Email from Steve Hatcher to Becky Szakats Dines re: dust control on A91 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 176 of 326 PAGEID #: 40338 ^ 7/13/2000 7/17/2000 7/19/2000 7/20/2000 7/20/2000 7/20/2000 7/21/2000 7/24/2000 7/24/2000 7/24/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, landfill and respiratory protection. TRW001519). (Bates No. EID070990, Email from Thomas R. Waldron to Lyle K. Carder re: landfilling of orange bins. (Bates No. EID070991, TRW001520). Washington Works Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244 June 2000. (Bates No. EID070053-EID070063, CF005954CF005964). Wilbur Earl Tennant, et al. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company In the United States District Court for the Southern District of WV at Parkersburg, Civil Action No. 6:99-0488. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Company's Answers to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interrogatories and Responses to Requests for Production of Documents and Other Tangible Things" Washington Works Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244 Second Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID070032-EID070043, CF005933-CF005944). Washington Works Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244 Quarterly Leachate Analysis Report Second Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID070044-EID070052, CF005945-CF005953). Washington Works Monitoring Report Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244 Quarterly Pond Underdrain Analysis Report Second Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID070064-EID070067, CF005965-CF005968). Fax from Kevin McDonald (Kemron) to George Woytowich. Field sheets for sampling Dry Run monitoring wells. (Bates No. EID070712EID070720, GW007113-GW007121). Email from J. Scott DeBee to George Woytowich re: Kemron lab results and blank forms for stormwaters from Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070301, GW007100). Email from J. Scott DeBee to George Woytowich re: semi-annual stormwater data summary (1st half 2000). from Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070309-EID070310, GW007108-GW007109). Email from J. Scott DeBee to George Woytowich re: Kemron formaldehyde results for 2 samples from Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070311-EID070313, GW007110-GW007112). A92 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 177 of 326 PAGEID #: 40339 ^ 7/31/2000 7/31/2000 8/1/2000 9/26/2000 10/9/2000 9/4/1990 9/4/1990 3/6/1996 7/22/1993 4/2/1991 1/14/1997 12/31/1998 7/12/1995 \ TRILLIUM,, Product Information sheet for fluorochemical acid. Safety data for pentadecafluorooctanoic acid. Fax from Kevin McDonald (Kemron) to George Woytowich. Field sheets for re-sampling Dry Run monitoring wells. (Bates No. EID070721EID070727, GW007122-GW007129). Pacific Analytical semivolatiles results for samples collected 8/17/00. Galbraith Laboratories results for TR01. Material Safety Data Sheets Kemron Appendix XI results for one Dry Run sludge sample collected 8/23/90. WO# NO-08-282. (Bates No. EID035196-EID035220, JMM003725-JMM003749). Kemron Fax Appendix XI results for one Dry Run sludge sample collected 8/23/90. WO# NO-08-282. (Bates No. EID035187EID035195, CF001145-CF001153). Kemron metals and TCLP metals results for one bottom ash sample collected 2/21/96. WO# N6-02-457. (Bates No. EID035068EID035073, JMM005701-JMM005706). Kemron preliminary results for one Dry Run 001 Outlet sample collected 7/15/93. WO# N3-07-251. (Bates No. EID036098-EID036100, GW006494-GW006496). Kemron metals results for one Tote Bin Wash Water collected 3/12/91. WO# N1-03-217. (Bates No. EID036053-EID036058, JMM005657JMM005662). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, First Quarter 1997. (Bates No. EID023089-EID023105, GW000479-GW000495). Quarterly Statistical Review of Groundwater Monitoring Results, Dry Run Landfill, Forth Quarter 1998. (Bates No. EID023242-EID023251, GW000618-GW000627). Report from Robert M. Crowley to George Woytowich, Dry Run Monitoring Wells MW-6, 6A, 12, 12A, 13, 13A, 14 Second Quarter, 1995. (Bates No. EID030544-EID030561, GW000719-GW000736). A93 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 178 of 326 PAGEID #: 40340 3/10/1997 4/30/1990 4/24/1990 4/12/2000 3/15/1991 6/2/1998 1/29/1997 5/12/1980 1997 4/23/1990 8/24/1998 Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Daniel Weber re: disposal of materials from Washington Works. (Bates No.EID009492, EID031851-EID03154, RAK003220,GW000828-GW000831). TCLP results for one Bio Pond Sludge collected 4/23/90. Work Order # N0-04-276. (Bates No. EID030602- EID35604, JMM006932JMM006934). Kemron TCLP results for one Bio Pond Sludge sample collected 4/23/90. (Bates No. EID0035626-EID035628, JMM006956-JMM006958). Washington Works Monitoring Groundwater Report, Dry Run Landfill Permit WV0076244, 1st Quarter 2000. (Bates No. EID066998EID67008). Tables Dry Run Soils Metals & Fluoride v background. (Bates No. EID031184-EID031185). Memo from P. C. Mahoney to C. F. Muska, Re: Dry Run Groundwater Flow Map. (Bates No. EID018026-EID018027). Kemron report for sample 001 OUTLET (Bates No. EID023503EID023518, SDB001807-SDB001822). Appendix E Support Documentation for EPA's 10/16/98 samples. (Bates No. EID034848-EID034864, JMM 001493-JMM 001509). Interoffice memo from Harley D. Bickerstaff to Ronald W. Meloon & Lynwood K. Ireland re: pH, TSS, and T-Fe results for sample taken from Outlet 001. (Bates No. EID039240, TRW001220). Memo from C. J. Babcock to D. H. Snyder, Re: Waste Bio Sludge/Fly Ash Codisposal. (Bates No. EID029688-EID029801). Dry Run Landfill Task Team Anticipated Questions. (Bates No. EID029797-EID029801, LKI001047-LKI001047). Waste Characterization Forms with MSDS. Kemron Report for four monitoring wells MW-4, -5, -6, & -7 samples collected 3/27/90. (Bates No. EID03617, EID034990-EID035055, GW006363, GW001160-GW001225). Letter report form Charles Anderson re: results of vegetation survey A94 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 179 of 326 PAGEID #: 40341 3/10/1997 1/19/1998 1/21/1994 6/3/1999 9/3/1999 2/2/1999 2/24/1999 8/4/1999 9/12/1997 7/7/1999 performed on July 20-21, 1998. [Includes tables of observations and mineral results on grasses, and interoffice memo of transmittal.] (Bates No. EID030740-EID030758, RLR000701-RLR000719). with 9/4/98 cover Memo from R. L. Ritchey Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Daniel Weber re: disposal of materials from Washington Works. (Bates No. EID031853EID03154, GW000830-GW000831). Interoffice memo from Andrew S. Hartten to Reitzl and Weberda Re: Dry Run Comments, Disposal of materials from Washington Works. (Bates No. EID031853-EID03154, GW000830-GW000831). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. re: Dry Run Pond Nutrient Testing 1993. (Bates No. EID030786-EID00790, GW001320GW001324). Interoffice memo from Ralph G Stahl, Jr to Robert L Ritchey. re: Dry Run Pond Animal Tissues. (Bates No. EID017406-EID017409, RLR001962RLR001965). Email from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: 10/96 EPA Visit Summary. (Bates No. EID04319-EID024321, RLR002025RLR002027). Email from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: Site Specific Variancery. (Bates No. EID017864-EID017866, DAW000022DAW000024). Email from Daniel A. Weber to David Ramsey (DuPont) re: Dry Run Landfill 001 Discharge Limit with other attached emails. (Bates No. EID058058-EID058071, HDR001166- HDR001192). Email from Robert L. Ritchey to Daniel A. Weber (DuPont) re: Dry Run joint mtg minutes. (Bates No. EID037702-EID037703, JMM007767JMM007768). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to Robert L Ritchey etc.. re: Attached Note from Bob with attached memos.. (Bates No.EID017307EID017309, HDR000849-HDR000851). Email from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: FYI- Typical Background Fluoride levels. (Bates No. EID014197EID014198, GW001299- GW001300). A95 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 180 of 326 PAGEID #: 40342 9/3/1999 1/29/1999 1/20/1998 1/6/1998 6/30/2000 9/8/1999 5/7/1999 5/25/1999 5/12/1999 11/5/1999 Email from Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: Foam in Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID016852, RLR002007). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr to Thomas R. Waldron.. re: Attached Note about using lower pond water for dust control.. (Bates No.EID039378-EID039380, TRW000977-TRW000979). Table listing Pond 1 - Pre-Excavation Analytical Results, Single Sample Analysis After Sludge Removal, and Waste Composition for Anaerobic Digestion Ponds. (Bates No.EID034726-EID034727, JMM005864-??). Sludge Test Results (Bates No.EID008485). Anaerobic Digestion Ponds (Bates No.EID008485, JMM005863). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr to Daniel A. Weber to Robert L. Ritchey (DuPont) re: Pierson's Comments with 1/19/98 memo from Keith B. Pierson to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr, re: Wash Works Dry Run EPA Draft Report. (Bates No.EID0671288-EID067132, DAW000161-DAW000165). Interoffice memo from Robert L. Ritchey to distribution re: Dry Run permit Status & Insights. (Bates No. EID052906-EID052908, RLR0012887-RLR001288). Email from Becky S Dines to Thomas R. Waldron (DuPont) re: Boso. (Bates No. EID070987-EID070988, TRW001519-TRW001517). Email from Bharat O Desai to Richard A. Kirschner, Jr (DuPont) re: Results of Oberlin filtration test. (Bates No. EID070190-EID070192, JFM000785-JFM000787). Email from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Jon F Moore (DuPont) re: Permit limits for Fe & Al. (Bates No. EID070178-EID070181, JFM000759-JFM000762). Email from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Jon F Moore (DuPont) re: filtration tests. (Bates No. EID070176-EID070177, JFM000757JFM000758). Email from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr. to Jon F Moore etc. (DuPont) re: Project Appropriation Request, Phase II - Leachate Collection System. (Bates No. EID070157-EID070175, JFM000738-JFM000756). Email from M. Therese Zotti (DuPont) to George Woytowich (DuPont) A96 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 181 of 326 PAGEID #: 40343 ^ 11/16/1995 10/5/1999 10/6/1999 3/3/2000 1/13/2000 10/7/1999 9/2/1999 9/24/1999 12/9/1998 3/9/1999 10/13/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, re: Scrap for Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070294-EID070296, GW007092GW007094). Email to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: Dry Run 4444 Message. (Bates No. EID070271-EID070296, GW007069-GW007070). Email from James W Hunt (DuPont) to Robert F Pinchot (DuPont) re: Disposal of FEP Scrubber Packing Rings. (Bates No. EID070412EID070413, AC002509-AC002510). Email from Roger J. Zipfel to Chris Shoop re: essentially no C-8 in packing due to high oven temperature. (Bates No. EID070414EID070415, AC002511-AC002512). Email from Alison A Crane to Chris Shoop re: Bagline Printer Ink Cartridges-Used. (Bates No. EID070393-EID070397, AC002490AC002494). Email from Alison A Crane to Chris Shoop re:Disposal of FEP Scrubber Packing Rings. (Bates No. EID070386-EID070388, AC002483AC002485). Email from Chris Shoop to James W Hunt (DuPont) re: Disposal of FEP Scrubber Packing Rings. (Bates No. EID070382-EID070380, AC002479AC002480). Email from Chris Shoop to Roger J. Zipfel (DuPont) re: C-8 content of solids from supernate oberlin testing. (Bates No. EID070372-EID070374, AC002469-AC002470). Email from Chris Shoop to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: spent calcium sulfate. (Bates No. EID070375, AC002472). Email from Daniel A. Weber to Alison A Crane re: Uncapped Fluff, hazardous waste & the AFB. (Bates No. EID070362-EID070367, AC002457-AC002462). Email from Hayden E Lancaster to Alison A Crane etc. re: waste. (Bates No. EID070360-EID070361, AC002455-AC002456). Email from Chris E. Shoop to George Woytowich and Robert F. Pinchot re: disposal of FEP HF Scrubber Packing Material sent to Dry Run to due C-8 ND (<0.5 ppm). (Bates No. EID070355-EID0703564, AC002450AC002451). A97 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 182 of 326 PAGEID #: 40344 ^ 7/14/1999 9/30/1999 9/24/1999 6/2/1999 5/26/1999 12/17/1998 11/6/1998 11/3/1998 11/2/1998 9/16/1996 8/16/1996 \ TRILLIUM,, Email from Alison A Crane to John Brownfield re: Vicron 31-6. (Bates No. EID070331-EID070334, AC002426-AC002434). Email from Alison A Crane to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: Selar PTX315 Disposal. (Bates No. EID070340-EID070347, AC002435AC002442). Email from George Woytowich (DuPont) to Chris E. Shoop re: Sending Calcium Sulfate to Dry Run. (Bates No. EID070348-EID070354, AC002443-AC002449). Email from Alison a. Crane to Janet Y. Villers re: confirmation the TE7043, TE9423, TE9423D, and FPD9382 do not contain C-8. (Bates No. EID070329-EID70330, AC002424- AC00425). Email from Bharat O Desai to George Woytowich (DuPont) re: Permit Limits for Fe & Al. (Bates No. EID070321-EID070324, AC002441AC002444). Interoffice memo from Richard A. Kirschner, Jr to Jon F Moore (DuPont). re: high fecal results. (Bates No.EID030779-EID030782, JFM000390-JFM000393). Dry Run Landfill Team Members. (Bates No.EID031173, JMM000980). Interoffice memo from Robert L Ritchey to H David Ramsey etc. (DuPont). re: Draft Minutes of 11/3 mtg w/ EPA. (Bates No.EID017328EID017332, HDR000123-HDR000127). Interoffice memo from David E. Overton to Robert L. Ritchey re: molecular weights for polyesters. (Bates No. EID066193-EID0660197, CF000598-CF000599). Email from Thomas R. Waldron to H David Ramsey (DuPont) re: Current Situation - Dry Run Landfill Leachate Management. (Bates No. EID058056-EID058057, HDR001162-HDR0011163). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Ronald W. Meloon and Lynwood K. Ireland re: observations at landfill. (Bates No. EID014123EID014125, DAW00044-DAW00046). Interoffice memo from Thomas R. Waldron to Lynwood K. Ireland re: efforts made to address items identified by Cindy Musser during audit. (Bates No. EID014120- EID014122, DAW00041-DAW00043). A98 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 183 of 326 PAGEID #: 40345 ^ 10/29/1998 10/27/1998 10/19/1998 10/18/1998 10/14/1998 10/14/1998 10/14/1998 9/29/1998 5/29/1999 5/26/1999 9/3/1998 10/19/1999 4/15/1999 8/28/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: Monthly Sampling. (Bates No. EID030760-EID030762, RAK008792RAK008794). Interoffice memo from Robert L Ritchey to H David Ramsey etc. (DuPont) re: Interview of vet. (Bates No. EID017475-EID017489, RLR001816-RLR001820). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to Ralph G Stahl re: Aquashade. (Bates No. EID016849-EID016850, JMM 002744-JMM002745). Email from Daniel A. Weber to Isidoros J Zanikos re: Dry Run Landfill Foam analysis. (Bates No. EID017857-EID017859, DAW000062DAW000064). Interoffice memo from Daniel A. Weber to distribution re: Dry Run Landfill Foam analysis. (Bates No. EID016839-EID016840, RLR000142-RLR000143). Interoffice memo from Robert L Ritchey to Daniel A. Weber re: Revised List 2. (Bates No. EID041736-EID041738, GPS000747-GPS000749). Interoffice memo from Robert L Ritchey to John F Doughtry re: Foamers. (Bates No. EID015172-EID015173, RLR000146-RLR000147). Email from Robert L Ritchey to John Gannon re: Materials Landfilled. (Bates No. EID009743-EID0109746, RLR001971-RLR001974). Email from J Bart Ruiterto Bharat E. Desai re: Fe and Al Permit limits. (Bates No. EID030822-EID030823, RAK000032-RAK000033). Email from Bharat O. Desai to George Woytowich etc. re: Fe and Al Permit limits. (Bates No. EID053183-EID53186,RAK008633RAK008636). Interoffice memo from Robert L Ritchey to distribution re:Dry Run Changes. (Bates No. EID066147-EID066148). Interoffice memo from Chris E. Shoop to James W Hunt re: Fluorides in FEP Scrubber Packing Material. (Bates No. EID070416, AC002513). Email from William E H Hilton to Alison A Crane re: Bladder Bags for asbestos. (Bates No. EID070423-EID070481,AC002517-AC002577). Interoffice memo from Lynwood K. Ireland to Robert L Ritchey re:Dry A99 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 184 of 326 PAGEID #: 40346 8/18/1998 8/26/1998 9/17/1998 8/17/1998 8/10/1998 8/7/1998 7/12/1995 2/25/1993 2/2/1993 10/1/1999 Run Deer. (Bates No. EID005587-EID005591, HDR000290HDR000294). Interoffice memo from Viktor Williams to Rhonda G Carlin re: Polymer/resin decomposition info need. (Bates No. EID037639EID037642, JMM007641-JMM007644). Interoffice memo from John P. Bollmeier to distribution re: Polymerdegradation. (Bates No. EID066138-EID0661402). Letter from R Jeffries Byers Jr. to Robert L Ritchey re: Polymer/Resin Decomposition Information. (Bates No. EID066113-EID066118). Hand written notes on cattle effects. (Bates No. EID066124-EID066130, RV000532-RV000538). Interoffice memo from L William Buxton to Robert L Ritchey re: Degradation info. (Bates No. EID066119-EID066123, CF000624, RGS00766). Interoffice memo from Daniel A Weber to Distribution re: EPA 7/22/98 Sampling: Split Sample Results Summary. (Bates No. EID0244347EID024438, HDR000258-HDR0002624). Interoffice memo from Michael D Aucoin to Daniel A Weber re: Distinguishing F-11/F113. (Bates No. EID030720-EID030722, JMM002940-JMM002942). Email/Interoffice memo from Richard A Kirschra to George Woytowich re: Dry Run Landfill Leachate. (Bates No. EID016677-EID016706, GW001334-GW01363). Email/Interoffice memo from Ross S Hefta to George Woytowich re: Dry Run Landfill Feb 4 Meeting Mins, coal ash pH. (Bates No. EID053206-EID053211, GW001388-GW01393). Email/Interoffice memo from George Woytowich to Robert L Carlsen re: Dry Run Well #14 Specific Conductance. (Bates No. EID030815EID030820, GW001328-GW01333). Email from George Woytowich to Alison A Crane re: MSDS & Deposition. (Bates No. EID021597-EID021603, GWK000003GWK000009). Larry Wright well with chemicals from DuPont Landfill (Bates No. A100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 185 of 326 PAGEID #: 40347 ^ 3/23/2000 9/5/2000 6/23/2000 12/6/2000 10/4/2000 9/26/2000 12/23/1996 12/31/1996 7/7/1981 3/23/2000 3/15/1991 11/12/1993 2/11/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, EID013164, LKI000753). Philadelphia Inquirer. (Bates No. EID070318, RLR002132). Pacific Analytical Report with spectra. Letter from Gerald L. Kennedy to Dr. Charles M. Auer re: DuPont's uses of APFO. Includes Voluntary Use and Exposure Information Profile. (Bates No. EID070482-EID070492). Pacific Analytical Narrative Report and Form I for 08/17/00 TR001 Sample. Fax from STL Envirotech 8/17/00 TRO1 Metal analysis. Pacific Analytical Report for 08/17/00 TR001 Sample. Letter from W.M. Stewart to Barbara S. Taylor re; submission of additional information to supplement Dry Run Landfill permit renewal application. (Bates No. EID020596-EID020641, RAK001035RAK001080). Fax from Matthew Crown to David Ramsey re: requesting signature to Order Issued Under the Water Pollution Control Act. Includes hand written note also dated 12/31/96. (Bates No. EID024188-EID024189, HDR000661-HDR000662). Letter from Rkimberly A Iverson to Phillip P Burks, Jr. (DuPont) re: FC143 Decomposition Products. (Bates No. EID123105-EID123106, DUP000809-DUP000810). Philadelphia Inquirer. (Bates No. EID070318, RLR002132). Memo from P.C. Mahoney to C.F. Muska re: groundwater flow rate and direction. Includes maps indicating flow in bedrock and overburden aquifers. (Bates No. EID018026-EID018028, CF001139-CF001141). Letter from Bruce E Baker (DuPont) to Neil O Brace (Wheaton College re: Toxicity of perfluorohexyl ethyl iodide. (Bates No. EID101637EID101638, GK001588-GK001589). Email from Stephen H. Korzaniewski (DuPont) to Agarald L Kennidy re ITC Fluorochemicals and us. EID099482-EID099485, GK000052GK000055). A101 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 186 of 326 PAGEID #: 40348 ^ 5/5/2000 9/29/1977 6/28/2000 12/8/1994 9/23/1998 11/10/1978 9/16/1976 1/10/1997 1/9/1997 10/30/1998 5/6/1999 4/29/1991 \ TRILLIUM,, Polymer Composition. (Bates No. EID099501-EID099510, GK000071GK000080). Letter from Gerald L. Kennedy to Mr. Charles M. Auer re: Recap of May 1 meeting. (Bates No. EID100020, GK001138). Industrial Bio-Test Laboratory, Report to 3M 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study with FC-143 in Albino Rats. 3M Company, Summary for Foaming Studies Don on Various AFFF Products. Edwin E. Tucker, Precipitation and Ultrafiltration Experiments with 3M FC 203-CF. Covance Laboratories, 26-Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Cynomogus Monkeys. International Research and Development Corp, Ninety Day Subacute Rhesus Monkey Toxicity Study. Industrial Bio-Test Laboratory, Report to 3M 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study with FC-143 in Albino Rats. Biosearch, Inc., Acute Oral Toxicity - Rats. Corning Hazleton Inc., Acute Oral Toxicity Study of T6669 in Rats. L. B Biegel, DuPont Haskell Laboratory, Hazard Characterization for Human Health C8 Exposure. (Bates No. EID0808081-EID080840, MAB000010-MAB000042). Interoffice memo from H. J. Trochimowicz and G. L. Kennedy to SHE Leadership Team re Carcinogenic and Developmental Toxicity Hazard Determinations Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate. (Bates No. EID08667EID086680, RCG000014-RCG000017). Covance Laboratories, Draft Report 26-Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Cynomogus Monkeys. (Bates No. CLI0412-CLI0450). DuPont MSDS C-8 20% Solution. (Bates No. EID087263-EID087269). DuPont, Acceptable Exposure Limits (AEL) List - Preface. (Bates No. EID076109-EID076115). A102 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 187 of 326 PAGEID #: 40349 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 8/4/2000 9/12/1985 7/31/1980 5/22/2000 10/19/1982 6/13/1984 6/14/1986 5/12/1987 Email from Anthony J Playtis to H David Ramsey re: C-8 Exposure Limits. (Bates No. EID089513). C-8 Control Levels. (Bates No. EID078904-EID078915). Dry Landfill Chronology 1995-1998. (Bates No. EID089743EID089745). Dry Run Landfill: C-8 History Summary. (Bates No. EID078867, RJZ006998). C-8 Historical Prospective. (Bates No. EID080125, AJP001653). Interoffice memo from L. B. Dahl to A. C. Huston and J. J. Di Nicolar re: No. 1 Supernate Pond Sludge Analysis. (Bates No. EID007976, RAK002872). C-8 Detected. (Bates No. EID079259, RJZ010004). Steps to Reduce Exposure. (Bates No. EID079261, RJZ010008). PFOA Concentrations (Bates No. EID089310). C. E. Steiner, C-8 Communications Meeting. (Bates No. EID079399EID079408, AJP002522-AJP002561). Births and Pregnancies. (Bates No. EID079375). DuPont EMSE-054-00, Modeling Releases of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate into the Ohio River. (Bates No. EID108608EID1086158, RP001967-RP001974). Interoffice memo from J. G. Loschiavo to R. J. Zipfel re: Estimate of Human C-8 Exposure Resulting from Drinking Ohio River Water. (Bates No. EID079287-EID079292, AJP002414-AJP002419). Interoffice memo from J. A. Schmid to H. V. Bradley et al. re: C-8 in Water. (Bates No. EID079102). Interoffice memo from J.F. Doughty to J. A. Schmid. re: Update on C-8 in Water Samples. (Bates No. EID079271-EID079272). Interoffice memo from Roger Zipfel to John Crum. re: C-8 in Water. (Bates No. EID079091-EID079094, RJZ009208-RJZ009211). A103 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 188 of 326 PAGEID #: 40350 6/11/1987 6/15/1987 7/7/1987 8/29/1988 8/29/1988 1/30/1989 5/31/1989 6/12/1989 6/30/1989 6/30/1989 3/27/1991 10/3/1991 R. J. Zipfel, C-8 Reduction & Control Programs Status. (Bates No. EID079685-EID079701, AJP002315-AJP002331). Letter from A.C. Huston to David Robinson (WVDWR). re: planned physical change at plant resulting in minor change discharge from 002 and 005. (EID076048-EID076051). Interoffice memo from Roger Zipfel to C A Dykes and J A Schmid. re: C8 Control Program. (Bates No. EID091375-EID091377, RJZ026552RJZ026554). Interoffice memo from Anthony J. Playtis to Roger Zipfel. re: Test Results C-8 in Groundwater. (Bates No. EID079090, RJZ009207). Interoffice memo from Anthony J. Playtis to Roger Zipfel. re: Test Results C-8 in Groundwater. (Bates No. USEPA 8850, RJZ009207). Interoffice memo from Anthony J. Playtis to Roger Zipfel. re: Test Results C-8 in Water. (Bates No. EID079089). Interoffice memo from William E Crawley to Anthony J Playtis re: C-8 Sampling. (Bates No. EID079087, RJZ009200). H. D. Ramsey, Standby Press Release. EID079158, RJZ009758-RJZ009762). (Bates No. EID079154- Interoffice memo from Anthony J Playtis to William E Crawley re: C-8 in Water Results From ESL. (Bates No. EID079124). Interoffice memo from William E Crawley to Howard A Smith re: C-8 in Water Results May 1989From ESL. (Bates No. EID079088). Interoffice memo from P C Mahoney to distribution list re: Quarterly C-8 Results at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID080172-EID080173, AJP001651AJP001652). AIM with Chart titled C-8 in PPM Dry Run Landfill. (EID080797EID080801, GW006836-GW006840). Temporary Operating Instructions. RAK002923-RAK002927). (EID024306-EID024310, Interoffice memo from R J Zipfel to distribution re: C-8 in Water Sample Results Ohio River, Site Test Wells, and New Lubeck Water System. A104 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 189 of 326 PAGEID #: 40351 ^ 1993 11/9/1994 4/18/1995 3/20/1996 10/7/1996 11/14/1997 9/14/1999 11/2/1998 2/24/1999 5/10/1998 6/23/1999 6/24/1999 8/11/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, (Bates No. EID079110-EID0791158, RJZ00253-RJZ009258). C-8 in Washington Works Drinking Water. (Bates No. EID89421). F. D Gilliland and J. S Mandel, "Mortality Among Employees of a Perfluorooctanoic Acid Production Plant JOM, 35(9) 1993 pp. 950-954. (Bates No. EID088658-EID088662). Interoffice memo from Michael E Gell to distribution re: C-8 MSDS (suspect - small "c" carcinogen?). (Bates No. EID089977, RJZ015850). QA Lab Work Request re 4/16/95 sample received from E J Tennant. (Bates No. CA002-CA003). Conservation with Gerry Kennedy (3M). Re: C-8 Toxicity. (Bates No. EID073254, AJP000691). Interoffice memo from Thomas R Waldron to Ronald W Meloon and Lynwood K Ireland re: Dry Run Landfill. (Bates No. EID039281). Interoffice memo from Daniel A Weber to Lynwood K Ireland et al. re: C-8 Data for Domestic Water Wells. (Bates No. EID091600, DAW 000638). Email from Vera L Wigal to Rodger J Zipfel re: C-8 Environmental Sampling FC-143 Results. (Bates No. EID082057, GW082058). Interoffice memo from Gerry Kennedy to Oscar T Garza et al. re: C-8 Monkey Study. (Bates No. EID088762, GWJ000189). Email from Gerry Kennedy to Brock et al. re: C-8 Monkey Study. (Bates No. EID087006, GRJZ012241). Interoffice memo from Daniel A Weber to Robert L Ritchey and John M Migliore, re: C-8 in East Field Wells. (Bates No. EID091591, DAW000627). Email from Dawn D Jackson to Robert L Ritchey et al. re: Outline of Communications with GE Plastics Regarding C-8. (Bates No. EID082078-EID082080). Letter from R L Ritchey (DuPont) to Martin Kotsch (EPA). re: RFI Report.. (Bates No. EID073527, EID073646-EID073647). Email from William R Berti to Roger J Zipfel re: Estimated C-8 in River. A105 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 190 of 326 PAGEID #: 40352 ^ 8/18/1999 8/11/1999 9/2/1999 10/27/1999 11/17/1999 1/12/2000 11/19/1999 5/25/2000 6/9/2000 6/13/2000 10/4/2000 1/17/1997 \ TRILLIUM,, (Bates No. EID082037-EID082047). Email from Karl G Kronberg to David F Altman re: Recovered C-8. (Bates No. EID075784-EID075785, DFA000327-DFS000328). Letter from John H Little (DuPont) to Dallas Silverstone (GE) re: Results for GE sample collected 6/3/99 Report.. (Bates No. EID089407EID089415). Letter from Kris Hansen (3M Environmental Lab) to Paul Lieder re: POAA Levels in Monkeys. (Bates No. EID088631-EID088655, GWJ00050-GWJ00074). Fax from Rob Pinchot to Garza re: C-8 Monkey Study. (Bates No. EID087238-EID087254, OTG000256-OTG000272). Email from Roger J Zipfel to Robert Pinchot re: C-8 Monkey Study and Allowable Exposure Limits. (Bates No. EID081959-EID081960, RJZ014902-RJZ014903). C-8 Monkey Study Communication Plan. (Bates No. EID083021, RP000141). Letter from Andrew V Malinowski (DuPont) to Douglas Johns(GE). re: TSCA Decision. (Bates No. EID089383-EID089385). Letter from Katherine E Reed (3M) to EPA re: TSCA Risk Notice. (Bates No. EID102775-EID1027765, AVM000209-AVM000210). Letter from Gerald L Kennedy (DuPont) to Charles M Auer (EPA) re: Summaries of DuPont Haskell Lab studies. (Bates No. EID091521EID091574). Email from Anthony J Playtis to Paul J Bossert et Al. re: C-8 TLV. (Bates No. EID076894, RLR002852). Email from H David Ramsey to Dawn D Jackson et al. re: CMr. Graham of Dry Run Allowable Exposure Limits. (Bates No. EID086146EID086147, DDJ001516-DDJ001517). Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck) re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results. (Bates No. EID090036-EID090041, CF009524-CF009529). Gregory A. Chaplan, C-8 Program Concept Evaluation Plan (Bates No. A106 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 191 of 326 PAGEID #: 40353 ^ 10/31/2000 5/19/1999 11/20/2000 9/26/2000 9/14/2000 9/15/1994 12/6/2000 10/23/2000 1/12/2001 12/1/2000 8/21/2000 11/10/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, EID092770, EID092788--EID092092789, RJZ021593, RJZ021611RJZ021612). Letter from James C Cox (Lubeck) to Lebeck Customers re: LPSD Water Sample Results. Interoffice memo from Paul H Lieder to APFO Sub-committee: APME re: C-8 Monkey Study serum results. (Bates No. CLI0304-CLI0308). John L. Butenhoff, et al., Draft Toxicity of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Cynomogus Monkeys after Twenty-six Weeks of Oral Dosing. (Bates No.EID101453-EID101496, GK002546GK002589). Pathology Associates International, Draft Cell Proliferation Report 26Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO) in Cynomogus Monkeys, with cover later dated 9/29/00 from Kim Claggett (PAI). to Peter J Thomford (Covance). Handwritten and typed pages with C-8 results. (Bates No. EID103018EID103023, ASH010156, ASH010160-ASH1010164). Email from Robert L Ritchey to H David Ramsey re: GE sampling results. (Bates No. EID103379, RLR003302). R. J. Zipfel et al., C-8 Ammonium Perfluorooctonate Fluorosurfactant Strategies and Plans with 9/28/94 cover letter from Sharon Boone. Bates No. EID099864-EID099878, GK000800-GK000814). Pacific Analytical Analysis Data Sheet for 8/17/00 TR02 and TR04. Pacific Analytical, Data Package for 8/17/00 Sample TR01. Galbraith Laboratories, Results for TR01. DuPont's revised response to Third Set of Interrogatories. DuPont's "Answers to Plaintiffs' Third Set of Interrogatories. Pacific Analytical, Mass Spectra of PFOA ester. West Coast Analytical Service, Results for TR02, TR03, TR04, and TR05. Maps A107 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 192 of 326 PAGEID #: 40354 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 2/28/2001 11/14/2000 11/15/2000 9/1/2000 10/9/2000 4/4/1997 6/9/2000 6/19/2000 6/16/2000 5/31/2000 6/26/2000 4/12/1990 10/4/2000 7/28/1986 EPA AR226 Documents sent to EPA by 3M on Perfluorooctane sulfonate. Dry Run Landfill Analytical Data from DuPont CED on 3.5" floppy. (Bates No. EID1186664). West Coast Analytical Lab Report. West Coast Analytical Lab Report. Pacific Analytical SVOC Results for TR01. Severn Trent Laboratory Report, TR01. Animal Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Report of Laboratory Examination. (Bates No..EID068794-EID068800). Clyde Alloway, Jr. DVM, All Information I have concerning Tennant cattle. (Bates No..EID068314-EID068324). Handwritten Letter from Forrest H. Schar, DVM to Paula Durst Gillis re: Tennant vs. DuPont. (Bates No..EID068341). Letter from Robin Anderson-Burton (OH DoA). to Paula Durst Gillis re: public record attachments. (Bates No..EID068325-EID068339). Letter from T. H. Barrett DMV (Colonial Animal Hospital) re: Tennant Animals (Bates No..EID068340-EID068344). Letter from Janice Fuller (Michigan State U) to Paula Durst Gillis with attachments. Re subpoenas. (Bates No..EID068345-EID068424). Area Percentage Reports for TICs acquired 3/97 with mass spectra. (Bates No..EID068427-EID068563, EID068618-EID068617). Interoffice memo from Anthony J Playtis to Charles T Alt re: C-8 at Dry Run. (Bates No. EID080167-EID080169, AJP001587-AJP001589). STL metal results for TR01. Area Percentage Reports for TICs acquired 3/97 with mass spectra. (Bates No..EID068741-EID068793). Environmental Laboratory Group Data Reporting Sheet. (Bates No..MVP-01-2175580- MVP-01-175615). A108 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 193 of 326 PAGEID #: 40355 9/28/2000 7/28/2000 9/29/2000 4/5/2000 9/1/2000 3/29/2001 6/15/1995 2/20/2002 10/2/2000 Pacific Analytical, Data Package for 8/17/00 Sample TR01, TR02, TR03, TR04, & TR05 Covance Laboratories, Draft Report 26-Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Cynomogus Monkeys. (Bates No. CLI0557-CLI0614). Pathology Associates International, Draft Cell Proliferation Report from 26-Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Cynomogus Monkeys. (Bates No. CLI5287-CLI5308). Letter from Saroj R Das (Anilytics Inc) to Andrew Seacat (3M) re: TSH Analysis in Cynos Brief Comparison of Major Endpoints between PFOA and PFOS. (Bates No. EID099797, EID100000-EID100001). Email from John L Butenhoff (3M) to Gerald L Kennedy (DuPont) re APFO Study Report with attached Draft Toxicity of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Cynomogus Monkeys after Twenty-Six Weeks of Oral Dosing. (Bates No. EID101452-EID101496). Email from Peter S Welcker to Roger J Zipfel (DuPont) re Spills at No, 2 outfall. (Bates No. EID151900, RLR003540). DuPont Air, Perfluoroctanoic Acid GC - Absorption Tube Technique. (Bates No. EID151911-EID151927, RLR003551-RLR003567). USEPA Draft Hazardous Assessment of Perfluorooctanoic Acid and its Salts. Dave DuBois, McCord and Liz Lozada, Analysis of Perfluoro-Octanoic Acid Samples. (Bates No. EID152560-EID152567, SMK000185SMK00192). Naomi Kudo, Naoki Bandai and Yoichi Kawashima, Determination of Perfluorocarboxylic Acids by Gas-Liquid Chromatography in Rat Tissues, Toxicology Letters, 1998, 99, pp. 183-190. (Bates No. EID152568EID152575, SMK000185-SMK00192). Ta-Wei Fu, Fluoride Removal from Recovered C-8. (Bates No. EID 153490-EID153497, TWF000119-TWF000126). Fluorotelomer Intermediates Telomer A, Al, AN. (Bates No. EID152532EID152542, SMK000157-SMK00167). A109 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 194 of 326 PAGEID #: 40356 ,, 3/30/2001 6/18/2001 3/29/1999 10/19/1998 9/9/1997 10/23/2000 2/27/1978 2/12/2002 1/16/2002 11/14/2001 ~ Vt r il l iu m Email from C Art Gray to Robert L Ritchey re: Foam at #002 with attached analytical results. (Bates No. EID151901-EID151906, RLR003541-RLR003546). Email from Mary A Kaiser (Dupont) to Shields (STL-Denver) re: RFP for C-8 analysis in water via LC/MS/MS with attached Moody et al., Anal Chem. 2001 10 pp. 220-2206 and proposal from STL. (Bates No. EID150478-EID150494, EID150456-EID150475, EID150438EID150454, EID150174-EID150234, EID 150269, EID 150344EID150404). Letter from Robert L Ritchey (DuPont) to Shara L Casper (EPA) re analytical information on wastewater streams into WWTP. (Bates No. EID 150658-EID150673, JB00132-JB00148). Memo from D C Roe and P J Krusic to William Buxton re: Thermolysis of C8 Fluorosulfactant. (Bates No. EID151101-EID151103, LWB001087LWB001089). Paul Krusic and Chris Roe, Recient Applications of High-temperature Gas-phase NMR to Reactions of Interest to Fluoroproducts. (Bates No. EID151155-EID151167, LWB001141-LWB001153). Email from William R Berti to Laura R Walter re: Absorption studies on soil raw data (Bates No. EID164776-EID164791). Stephen K Welsh, 3M Technical Report Summary re: Adsorption of FC95 and FC143 on soil. (Bates No. EID124827-EID124828, GLK001018GLK001019). The Little Hocking Water Associates C-8 Test Results, Gaylan Duskey, Little Hocking C8 levels up to seven times higher than those near DuPont, NewsandSentinel.com Consent Order to DuPont Kurunthachalam Kannan et al., Accumulation of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate in Marine Mammals, ES&T, 2001, 35, pp. 1593-1598. DuPont map DuPont Summary of Sulfactants (Bates No. EID169658-EID169678, AEF000429-AEF000449). A110 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 195 of 326 PAGEID #: 40357 2/5/1999 7/6/2010 7/30/2001 7/7/1998 7/14/2000 C-8 Adsorption on soil ((Bates No. EID169821-EID170533). 3M, The Science of Organic Fluorochemistry. (Bates No. EID171081EID171092, MAB000429-MAB000440). Hand written note for PFOA calibration and calibration, and notebook pages. (Bates No. EID171197-EID171221, RK000111-RK000137). Ieva L. Reich et al, Synthesis of 14C-Labeled Prtfluorooctanoic and Perfluorodecanoic Acids; Purification of Perfluorodecanoic Acid, J of Labeled Compounds and Radiopharm, 1987, 24(10). (Bates No. EID171122-EID171223, RK000140-RK000141). PFOA Titration Curve (Bates No. EID171125-EID171226, RK000144RK000145). Amersah Pharmacia Biotech, Analytical Package preparation of Perfluoro[carboxyl-14C]octanoic acid, ammonium salt. (Bates No. EID171129-EID171269, RK000149-RK000191). Yoshikiyo Moroi et al., Determination of Acudity Constants of Perfluoroalkanoic Acids, Bull Chem Soc Jpn, 2001, 74, pp. 667-672. (Bates No. EID171270-EID171275, RK000193-RK000198). Donald F Hagen et al., Characterization of Fluorinated Metabolites by Gas Chromatographic Helium Microwave Plasma Detector - The Biotransformation of 1H,1H, 2H, 2H,-Perfluorodecanol to Perfluorooctanoate, Anal Biochem, 1981, 118 pp. 336-343. (Bates No. EID171370-EID171377, RK000301-RK000308). Absorption/Desorption Study on APFO. (Bates No. EID174512EID174513, WAB000822-WAB00823). DuPont, Zonyl Fluorochemical Intermediates. (Bates No. EID168545EID168574, AEF000450-AEF000479-RK000145). DuPont,Alternative Selfactants for FEP Line 3, Report No. PM-W-316. (Bates No. EID168602-EID168650, AEF000572-AEF000479AEF000620). Critical Surface Tensions of Polymer Surfaces, Comparison Telomerization vs. ECF Chemistries (Bates No. EID168715-EID168720, AEF000572-AEF000479). ZONYL Telomer Intermediates. (Bates No. EID168725-EID168729, A111 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 196 of 326 PAGEID #: 40358 11/22/2000 8/16/2001 5/8/2001 10/16/1995 1998 5/31/1998 4/5/2001 5/16/2001 7/17/2000 11/9/1998 DAH000125-DAH000129). Evaluating Remediation Options: Aqueous Phase Recalcitrant Organic Compounds, (Bates No. EID168730-EID168744, DAH000131DAH000145). Roger Zipfel, Parkersburg Treatment of Supernate Wastewater, (Bates No. EID169237-EID169244). Fluoroproducts Study Group (Bates No. EID169284-EID169288). Equations for C-8 Absorption (Bates No. EID178569-EID178588). Interoffice Memo from Martin Schiller to Rik Brandenberg re: C-8 properties. (Bates No. EID178515-EID178526). Rust Process Data Test (Bates No. EID178467-EID178468). Interoffice Memorandoms on recovering spent C-8, corrosion. (Bates No. EID 178451-EID 178464, EID 178424-EID178427, EID 178419- EID178420, EID 178399-EID178402 EID178249-EID178357). Interoffice Memo from Bert Moniz to Author J Sweet re: F and glass corrosion. (Bates No. EID178461). DuPont, C8 Recovery Study (Bates No. EID178358-EID178378). Walter R Tong and James A Schultz, Purification of Recovered Perfluorooctonate. (Bates No. EID178293-EID178314). Patent Fluorinated Carboxylic Acif Recovery and Reuse, (Bates No. EID 178254-EID178260). Walter R Tong et al.,DFS-1 (Ammonium Perfluorooctonate). Basic Data (Bates No. EID177566-EID177583). Handwritten pages by Larry E Butler C8 Scrubber Effeciency (Bates No. EID177454-EID177455). Interoffice Memo from Thomas Friedman to Ta-Wei Fu re:True Supernate Sedimentation (Bates No. EID177443-EID177453). 3M Perfluorinated C8 Acid % Composition (Bates No. EID177213EID17215). A112 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 197 of 326 PAGEID #: 40359 ^ 12/4/1999 6/15/2000 7/13/2000 8/22/2000 2/13/1996 8/2/2000 2/15/2002 2/27/1978 3/23/1978 9/12/2001 10/18/1993 11/12/1996 \ TRILLIUM,, RM 350 - Analytical Methods, Appearance, Potentiometric, color, iron, KMnO4 - Number of RM 350/S and Residue at 380oC (Bates No. EID177201-EID177212). DuPont Nederland, Headspace Analysis of a Solution by GC-MS.(Bates No. EID177192-EID177826). DuPont Nederland, GC-MS Analysis of Methylated Perfluoroactanoic acid. (Bates No. EID177185-EID177191). FEP - C-8 Flow Sheet (Bates No. EID177167-EID177175). Addments to Patent claimes. (Bates No. EID177126-EID177130 EID177116-EID177120). WV Gazette Newspaper Article, Wood Water Woes May Be Worse Ken Ward Jr.,WV Gazette Newspaper Article, Glass Vials May Have Affected DuPont's C-8 Water Samples. DuPont, Aqueous Polymerization Process for Fluoropolymers: New Initiators, Sulfactants, Addatives and Chain Transfer Agents. (Bates No. EID169372-EID169479). Health and Safety Data Reporting Form (Bates No. EID163391EID163407). Email from Stephen R Peck to Robert J Cavanaugh (DuPont) re Spruance Samples DuPont' Response to first set of Interrogatories 3M Technical Report Summary, Adsorption of FC 95 and FC 143 on Soil (Bates No. EID124827-EID124840). 3M Technical Report Summary, Final Comprehensive Report: FC 143 1977-1979 (Bates No. EID124841-EID124851). DuPont Process Description Grainular. (Bates No. EID127665EID127684). Chronology of Sulfactants, hand written (Bates No. EID148068EID148069). Robert E. Buntrock (Buntrock Assoc). BAI Search 96126, Conoco A113 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 198 of 326 PAGEID #: 40360 10/26/2000 6/2/2000 7/17/2001 4/19/2001 11/29/2000 7/2/2002 5/2/2001 11/27/2000 Determination of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate. (Bates No. EID149430EID149447). Mass Spectroscopt Method for PFOA (Bates No. EID 166446EID166448). William R. Berti (DuPont), Environmental Fate of Ammonium Perfluorooctonate (APFO).: Preliminary Studies Modeling APFO in the Ohio River and Adsorption to Soils and Sediments. (Bates No. EID168473-EID168491). DFS-1 Background. (Bates No. EID165844-EID165850). Critical Surface Tensions of Polymer Surfaces, Comparison Telomerization vs. ECF Chemistries (Bates No. EID165839EID165843). Email from Gary W Jepson to Shawn A Gannon re: product tree. (Bates No. EID220459--EID220469). Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group Draft Minutes of TRP Anlytical Meeting at Atofina Offices. (Bates No. EID219637--EID219641). Email from S Mark Kennsed to John C COconnor re:Analytical meeting with Jack Henion of ABS. (Bates No. EID220327--EID220328). Measurement of Fluorochemicals in Blood. (Bates No. EID230687-EID230692). Letter from H A Smith to R C Graham and G. L Kennedy re AEL and CEG Reqests. (Bates No. EID229344--EID229348). Memo from Michael Dourson to Dee Ann Statts (WVDEP re: C8 pRfC. (Bates No. WVDEP 12007--WVDEP11677). Batelle, Multi-City Study Specific SOPs. (Bates No. EID150301-EID150303). 3M, Complete Analytical Laboratory Report on the Quantitative Analysis of Fluorochemicals in Environmental Samples. (Bates No. EID152376-EID152508). Summary of visit of Dr. Scott Malbury, U of Toronto A114 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 199 of 326 PAGEID #: 40361 3/29/2001 7/18/1985 9/21/1999 9/17/1999 9/17/1999 3/26/1999 7/16/1999 7/21/1999 4/3/1981 Donald E Elliott, Anomalous Response of Flame Ionization Detector to Perfluorinated Carboxylic Acids, J of Chromatographic Science 1977, 15, pp475-477 Thomas Friedmann et al., Containment of APFO Fluoropolymer Solids Removed from Aqueous Streams. (Bates No. EID153037--EID153144 and EID1532090EID153413). DuPont Telomer AL Iodohydrin Assay by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID137954--EID137964). DuPont Zonyl TELB Determination of Composition by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID137965--EID137986). Dupont Speciality Chemicals Guide Card System. (Bates No. EID137987--EID138014). DuPont Zonyl TELB (Telomer A). Determination of Composition by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID138015--EID138034). DuPont Zonyl AB (Telomer B Alcohol). Determination of Composition by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID138035--EID138054). Performace Chemicals Process Technology. (Bates No. EID138055-EID138063). DuPont Analytical Test Method Zonyl BA (Telomer B Alcohom ).Determination of Composition by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID 138064--EID138087). DuPont Analytical Test Method Zonyl TELA (Telomer A). Determination of Composition by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID138064-EID138087). DuPont Analytical Test Method Zonyl TELB Determination of Composition by Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID138112-EID138135). Draft Product Testing Overview: Classes and Materials. (Bates No. EID138136). DuPont, Blood, Determination of Perfluorooctanoic acid Gas Chromatographic Method. (Bates No. EID138137--EID138158). A115 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 200 of 326 PAGEID #: 40362 5/2000 William R. Berti (DuPont), Adsorption-Desorption Screening Studies of Ammonium Perfluorooctonate. (Bates No. EID138159--EID138182). 4/9 & 10/2001 Dupont, Technology Conference, C-8 Removal and Recovery from Waste Water. (Bates No. EID138466--EID138563). 8/1/1997 Weston, Analytical Report Dry Run Creek Site, Vol 1 to 5 (Bates No. USEPA4467-USEPA4471). 9/29/1997 Weston, Analytical Report Dry Run Creek Site, Vol 1 to 5 (Bates No. USEPA4462-USEPA4466). 9/29/1997 Weston, Check Records Dry Run Creek Site, Vol 1 of 1 (Bates No. USEPA4459). 9/29/1997 Weston, Check Records Dry Run Creek Site, Vol 1 to 2 (Bates No. USEPA4460-USEPA4461). 5/19/1999 Weston, Analytical Report Dry Run Creek Site, Vol 1 to 2 (Bates No. USEPA4457-USEPA4458). 2/20/2002 USEPA Draft Hazard Assessment of Perfluorooctanoic Acid and its Salts. Flurrinated Alkanoic Acid Purification Process (Bates No, EID177105EID177115). Flurrinated Carboxylic Acid Purification and Reuse (Bates No, EID177094-EID177104). 5/24/2001 DuPont APFO/PFOA Containment & Recycle Technology. (Bates No, EID177064-EID177071). 4/17/1996 R. J Cavanaugh, Evaluation of Dispersion Made with Alternate Sulfactants. (Bates No, EID176997-EID176992). 5/12/1997 DuPont, 20% C8 Determination of Concentration Density Method. (Bates No, EID176988-EID176992). also (Bates No, EID179214-EID179218). 6/1997 P. J. Krusic, S. Hill and D. C. Roe, Oxidative Fragmentations of Fluoroalkyl chains Studied by High-Temperature Gas-Phase 19F NMR, Fluoroproducts R&D, June 1997. (Bates No, EID185928-EID185932). Paul Krusic 19F NMR at various temperatures (Bates No, EID185992EID185927). A116 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 201 of 326 PAGEID #: 40363 ^ 5/1997 8/4/1999 5/17/1996 5/10/1999 9/8/1998 10/13/1997 1/27/1987 11/18/1986 9/2/1986 5/6/1975 11/30/1965 5/4/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, P. J. Krusic and D. C. Roe, Thermal ecomposition of C8 Fluorinated Sulfactants and Related Materials Studied by High-Temperature Gas Phase 19F NMR, Fluoroproducts R&D, May 1997. (Bates No, EID185928-EID185932). 3M Density Using the Density Meter Method. (Bates No, EID185909EID185911). 3M, pH of Fluorochemical Salts (Bates No, EID185906-EID185908). 3M, Turbidity Determinaion of Liquids (Bates No, EID185900EID185905). 3M, Product Specification FC-118 and FC1094 Fluorad Fluorochemical Sulfactant and QCM 171.140.7 Perfluorinated C8 Acid, Its Salt or the Aqueous Salt, % Composition by GC (Bates No, EID185893EID185899). Quantitation of Iron in F8216 (Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate). (Bates No, EID185885-EID185892). US Patent 4,639,227, Process for Separating Sulfactants from Liquid Used in the Manufacture of Concentrated Fluoropolymer Dispersions. (Bates No, EID185628-EID185634). US Patent 4,623,487, Process for Recovery of Fluorosulfactants. (Bates No, EID185624-EID185627). US Patent 4,609,497, Process for Separating Sulfactants from Liquid Used in the Manufacture of Concentrated Fluoropolymer Dispersions. (Bates No, EID185613-EID185623). US Patent 3,882,153, Method for Recovering Fluorinated Sulfactants. (Bates No, EID185644-EID185612). US Patent 3,221,008, Ion Exchange Process for the Recovery of Ionic Organic Substances. (Bates No, EID185594-EID185603). C-8 What is It. (Bates No, EID185565-EID185571). DuPont, Teflon Process Streams Determination of Fluoride. (Bates No, EID185522-EID185526). Plot of Specific Gravity vs C-8 Concentration. (Bates No, EID185520EID185521). also (Bates No. EID179165). A117 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 202 of 326 PAGEID #: 40364 4/8/1999 9/7/2001 12/21/2001 12/1986 12/4/1990 12/5/2001 4/5/1993 R. M. Aten, FS-62 in PFA. (Bates No, EID185500-EID185507). PFA Dispersion. (Bates No, EID185498-EID185499). Table 3: Dispersion and Polymer Properties, (Bates No, EID185487EID185490). Grainular C-8 Flow Sheet. (Bates No, EID185434-EID185438). Fluoid Fluorochemical Sulfactant FC-143. (Bates No, EID185382EID185391). Email from James B Dunson, Jr, to Roger J Zipfel re: oxidative Destruction of Triton. (Bates No, EID185367). Pie Charts, Sources of Supernate (Bates No, EID185012-EID185018). Letter from R L Ritchey to WVDEP re: Concent order. (Bates No, EID183430-EID183432). L. T. Reitz (DuPont), Ground Water Sampling Manual. (Bates No. EID182292-EID182335). Fax from Lisa Diaz to Penny Mahoney with attached soil sampling procedures and monitoring well installation. (Bates No. EID182269EID182281). Handwritten note book pages with map location of wells along Ohio River. (Bates No. EID181411-EID181414). Section C-7 Process Flow Diagram - Teflon Fine Powder/Dispersion. (Bates No. EID181156-EID181157). Email from Michael Evans to Chris E Shoop re: Data for Consent Order Reporting, (Bates No. EID181154-EID181155). Letter from C P Huang (U of DE). to Terry D Vandell (DuPont) re: response to comments. (Bates No. EID181193-EID181197). C P Huang (U of DE). Draft The Development of Electrochemical Processes for In-situ Treatment of Perfluoroalkane-Carboxylate Contaminated Groundwater. (Bates No. EID180933-EID181042). Letter fromR L Ritchey to WVDEP re: Testing of FC-143 Filter System A118 -EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 203 of 326 PAGEID #: 40365 8/17/2001 7/19/2001 9/6/2001 8/16/2001 9/7/2001 11/20/2001 12/9/1999 2/13/1996 2/7/1986 11/2/1999 Modifications. (Bates No. EID180826-EID180833). WW 1999 & 2000 C-8 Useage and Disposal, (Bates No. EID180798EID180802). R J Zipfel, Process Description Grainular. (Bates No. EID180743EID180797). also (Bates No. EID179289-EID1797306). C-8 Emissions to Ohio River 2000-2003. (Bates No. EID180721EID180723). Email from Roger J Zipfel to Peter S Weicker re: Sample 122-2 Supernate (Bates No. EID180720). Email from James B. Brown Jr. to Roger J Zipfel re: Oxidative Destruction of Triton (Bates No. EID180720). Handwritten notes about oxidation reactions with Triton. (Bates No. EID180670-EID180676). Roger Zipfel, Parkersburg Treatment of Supernate Wastewater. (Bates No. EID 180599-EID180605). Email from James D Dunson to Roger J Zipfel re: Oxidative Destruction of Triton (Bates No. EID180597-EID180598). Handwritten notes about oxidation reactions with Triton. (Bates No. EID180589-EID180596). Roger Zipfel, DuPont/3M Environmental Technology Sharing Handling of Dilute C-8 Solutions (Bates No. EID180160-EID180173). Andrew E Feiring and William B Famham, Aqueous Polymerization Process for Fluoropolymers New Initiators, Sulfactants, Addatives, and Chain Transfer Agents. (Bates No. EID180068-EID180159). R A Morgan, Improved Dispensing Agents for Fluoropolymerization. . (Bates No. EID179961-EID180062). Email from Ralph N Miller to Roger J Zipfel re: Flash Calculations for TFE/HFP/water/F 13 mixture. (Bates No. EID179880-EID179885). Charts of scrubber temps 2/23/01 through 3/2/02. (Bates No. EID179829-EID179837). A119 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 204 of 326 PAGEID #: 40366 12/8/2000 3/21/1997 12/9/1996 3/16/2000 5/11/1994 7/17/1998 7/17/1998 9/2/1994 Process K Isolation/Drying Basic Data - C8 Adsorption on Carbon. (Bates No. EID179797-EID179816). Handwritten document, Theoretical Calculations C08 Removal from Polymer. (Bates No. EID179767-EID1797861). Handwritten Plots Condensor Cool Temp v % C-8 Recovery etc. (Bates No. EID179759-EID1797761). Hans Plaat and Ton Roelen, Sulfactant Removal from Aqueous Streams. (Bates No. EID179746-EID1797758). Interoffice Memo from Theodore Treat to Gregory A Chapman and Roger J Zipfel re: H4-C8 Sulfactant in TE-3313. (Bates No. EID179743EID1797744). Appendix 2, Analytical Technique Used to Determine C-8 Concentration in Aqueous Solution and Teflon FEP Fluorocarbon Resin, Aqueous Dispersion Equivalent C-8 Dispersing Agent. (Bates No. EID179722EID1797726). Mark Hermus et al. Eliminating Foaming of C8 Scrubber in PTFE. (Bates No. EID179722-EID1797726). Dupont, Teflon TFE-Fluorocarbon Resin Fine Powder, Ammonium Perfluorooctonate (C-8). in Fine Powder and Other Solids Gas Chromatography. (Bates No. EID179266-EID1797279). also (Bates No. EID179197-EID1797196). Dupont, Teflon Process Streams Determination of fluoride. (Bates No. EID179261 -EID1797265). Dupont, 20% C8 Alpha Color Hach DR/2000 Method, (Bates No. EID179257-EID1797260). also (Bates No. EID179204-EID1797207). DuPont,Fluoropolymers Products Specification Manual, Section II, Raw Material: RM-102 FC-1094. (Bates No. EID179255-EID1797256). also (Bates No. EID179183). DuPont,Fluoropolymers Products Specification Manual, Section II, Raw Material: RM-127 FC-118. (Bates No. EID179251-EID1797252). also (Bates No, EID179212-EID179213)., (Bates No. EID179196). Dupont, Teflon TFE-Fluorocarbon Resin Fine Powder,Dispersion and Aqueous Solution Determination of pH. (Bates No. EID179242- A120 -EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 205 of 326 PAGEID #: 40367 7/21/1999 3/15/1996 7/17/1998 7/22/1996 11/4/1996 12/2000 10/16/1995 9/14/1999 12/11/1998 EID1797248). DuPont,Teflon FEP Specification Manual, Part II, Tentative Release Specificationl: Potassium C8 Salt for Recycling. (Bates No. EID179210EID1797211). Dupont, Procurement Specification: FC1013 (solution of FC143). (Bates No. EID179208-EID1797209). 3M, APS Demand and UV Extinction of 20% Fluorochemical Solutions. (Bates No. EID179190-EID179195). 3M, APHA Color. (Bates No. EID179184-EID179189). DuPont, Teflon PTFE and PFA Fluorocarbon Dispersion Fluoride. (Bates No, EID179156-EID179163). Fig 1: Ideal Dissociation of HF in water at 25oC. (Bates No, EID179031). Selected Properties of Triton X-100. (Bates No, EID179022-EID179029). DuPont, Operating Instructions Subject: DFS-1. (Bates No, EID 178660EID178759). Calgon Carbon Corporation, Wastewater Technical Service Report, Adsorption Isotherms Testing for Removal of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate from Industrial Wastewater, (Bates No, EID178646EID178659). Interoffice Memo from Martain Schiller to Rick Brandenburg re: C-8 Properties. (Bates No, EID178612-EID178618). Table C-8 Levels in Public Drinking Water Supplies Email from Anthony J Playtis to Roger J Zipfel re: C-8 in Groundwater. (Bates No. EID082081-EID082087). German Patent, Hermann Badiel et al. Aqueous Dispersions of Fluoropolymers, (Bates No. EID198111-EID198126). C-8 Historical Prospective (Bates No. EID080125. Plot solubility APFO in water v temp (Bates No. EID08173943). A121 -EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 206 of 326 PAGEID #: 40368 12/8/1981 5/11/1982 8/29/1984 8/30/1984 6/25/1986 12/18/1987 3/8/1988 Sampling Program Summary (Bates No. EID909818). Dupont Washington Works C-8 Groundwater Database. (Bates No. WVDEP14497-WVDEP14504-EID082087). Dupont Analytical Thenique Used to Determine C-8 Concentration in Aqueous Solution. (Bates No. EID214975-EID214979). Batelle SOP for collecting Aquatic Surface Microlayer Samples. (Bates No. EID192595-EID192599). Mary A Kaiser (DuPont), Measurements Involving Fluorinated Compounds. (Bates No. EID612959-EID692994). Severn Trent Laborator MDL Study PFOA and Meeting Adjenda. (Bates No. HLG001871EID636263-EID636267). DuPont Determination of C8 Dispersing Agent in Water. (Bates No. EID921915-EID921922). Memo from R L Cook to C P Mihl et al., re: FC143 Program Status. (Bates No. EID572627-EID572628). Farberke Hoechst, Summaries of Analytical Methods for Perfluorooctanoic Acid Determination. (Bates No. EID912943EID912946). Memo from J. F. Doughty to J. A. Schmidt re: Summary of C-8 in Water Sampling Program. (Bates No. EID079096-EID079100). Memo from P H Wyche Jr. to C F Riddick et al., re: FC-143 talking points. (Bates No. EID079183-EID079189). Memo from A C Huston to H V Bradley re: Elemination of Supernate Ponds. (Bates No. EID0602989). Lubeck Public Service District Benefits to DuPont (Bates No. EID181074-EID181076). C-8 Levels in drinking water. (Bates No. EID091388). Interoffice memo from Harry T Begg to distribution list. re: Lubeck Water System (Bates No. EID0181068-EID181071). Dupont Haskekk Lab Drinking Water Guidelines C-8. (Bates No. A122 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 207 of 326 PAGEID #: 40369 ^ 5/11/1988 9/1988 5/31/1990 9/27/1991 1/15/1993 3/7/1991 4/1/1991 5/7/1991 5/8/1991 5/10/1991 6/4/1991 6/6/1991 6/26/1991 EID477089-EID477092). \ TRILLIUM,, Interoffice memo from Anthony J Playtis to Rodger J Zipfel re:Routine Testing of Groundwater for C8 (Bates No. EID077758). CIVO Report Migration and Extraction of Emulsifiers from PTFE Coated Frying Pans. (Bates No. EID213164-EID213169). C-8 Levels in drinking water. (Bates No. EID951509-EID951511). Memo from Mike to Penny re C-8 water results 11-90 to 9/13/91. (Bates No. EID950228-EID950242). Memo from H A Smith to Distribution list re C-Review Meetings. (Bates No. EID924240-EID9244212). Handwritten C-8 in Groundwater Results. (Bates No.USEPA14993USEPA14994). Memo from Michael G McClusky to Penny C Mahoney re: WWK FC143 Results (Bates No. EID109493-EID109525). Memo from W P Anderson Jr. to distribution list list re: C-8 meeting (Bates No. EID556309). Handwritten Notes (Bates No. EID556290-EID556294). Memo from W P Anderson Jr. to Amy Berg re: Request for CEG for C-8 in Drinking water (Bates No. EID107358). AEL Meeting Charts. (Bates No. EID078781). Memo from R C Graham to distribution List re: AEL Committee Notes. (Bates No. USEPA15609-USEPA15616). Dupont Haskell Labopratory Information on C-8 (Bates No. EID107654EID107657). Email from Mark Christman re: 6/8/91 Meeting Notes. (Bates No. EID102770-EID102771). Memo from R C Graham to distribution List re: AEL Committee Notes. (Bates No. EID086812-EID086820). Background C-8. (Bates No. EID951584-EID951588). A123 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 208 of 326 PAGEID #: 40370 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 8/20/1991 8/20/1991 8/21/1991 9/19/1991 10/1991 10/3/1991 10/17/1991 10/29/1991 11/18/1991 11/20/1991 11/27/1991 2/20/1991 12/31/1991 Memo from H Alan Fones to Michael G McClusky re: C-8 Analysis. (Bates No. EID713598). Memo from Michael G McClusky to Penny C Mahoney & Walter M Stewart: C-8 Analysis. (Bates No. EID713597). Memo from Michael G McClusky to Penny C Mahoney & Walter M Stewart: More on C-8 Results. (Bates No. EID713595-EID713596). Memo from Terry Vandell to Walt Stewart re: Meeting minutes of proposed C-8 sampling plan (Bates No. EID7909790-EID909809). CH2M Hill Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Water. (Bates No. EID211377-EID211398). Memo from R J Zipfel to didtribution list re: C-8 in water sample results Ohio River, Site test wells and New Lubeck Water SystemMeeting minutes of proposed C-8 sampling plan (Bates No. EID909811EID909819). From Mike (McClusky). re more CH2M Hill Results. (Bates No. EID9118667). CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 10/8/91 samples. (Bates No. EID949518-EID949535). Memo from R. J. Zipfel to C-8 File re: C-8 InterLaboratory Meeting (Bates No. EID256133-EID256137). From Mike (McClusky). to Roger re: 11/19/91 results. (Bates No. EID949449). Memo from Daniel A Weber to distribution list re: 11/19/91 C-8 Sample Collection Summary. (Bates No. EID949490-EID949491). CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 10/8/91 samples. (Bates No. EID949493-EID949517). Fax from CH2M Hill containing C-8 Results & Surrogate recovery (Bates No. EID949287-EID949288). Memo from Daniel A Weberl to distribution list re: C-8 Results. (Bates No. EID935383-EID935385). A124 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 209 of 326 PAGEID #: 40371 ^ 1/2/1992 1/10/1992 1/21/1992 3/23/1992 4/10/1992 4/30/1992 5/8/1992 8/1/1993 6/1994 11/16/1996 1/7/1997 2/4/1997 11/14/1997 4/29/1998 \ TRILLIUM,, PFOA Concentrations 1992 - 2000 (Bates No. EID089516). CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 10/8/91 samples. (Bates No. EID949397-EID949414). Fax from CH2M Hill To John Doughty. (Bates No. EID949281EID949286). Memo from W. P. Anderson to list re: World-Wide Status Review for Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (C-8) on January 8, 1992 (Bates No. EID147883-EID147885). 1992 - 2001 Lubeck Sampling Results. (Bates No. EID195208). Letter from W M Stewart to William R Packard (Lubeck). re Feb 1992 results with attached CH2M Hill Form I. (Bates No. EID195965EID195968). Letter from Emily Williams (CH2M). to Dan Weber re 4/28/92 sample results, (Bates No. EID949536-EID949538). Quant Report. (Bates No. EID949558-EID949559). CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 4/28/92 samples, (Bates No. EID949542-EID949554). CH2M Hill Laboratory Report for 7/22/93 samples, (Bates No. EID181885-EID181987). Stephen R Peck Comparison of Methods for the Determination of C-8 in Water. (Bates No. EID950513-EID950525). Memo from Gearhhl to Ellisidw re C8 Assays. (Bates No. EID909896EID9909897). Letter from Victor Yastrop (Lockheed Martian). to Cynthia E. Caporale re: Organic Data Validation. (Bates No. EID920397-EID920414). DuPont Teflon Process Streams Determination of Fluoride. (Bates No. EID932994-EID932999). Email from Daniel A Weber to Lynwood K Ireland et al,. Re C-8 Data for domestic water wells. (Bates No. EID524249-EID524250). DuPont Determination of C8 Dispersing Agent in Water: Blue Dye A125 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 210 of 326 PAGEID #: 40372 ^ 7/9/1988 11/16/1998 2/2/1999 2/15/1999 3/15/1999 3/18/1999 5/10/1999 5/10/1998 5/11/1999 5/12/1998 5/17/1999 8/11/1999 1/13/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, Colorimetric Method. (Bates No. EID214971-EID214979). CH2M Hill Laboratory Results for samples collected 6/19/98. (Bates No. EID950991-EID951002). Memo from Michael D Aucoin to Daniel Webber and George Woytowich re C8 Analysis. (Bates No. EID545709). Memo from Michael D Aucoin to Harry L Gearhart re WW C8 Analysis. (Bates No. EID545557). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Elizabeth B Bishop re: FC-143 Update. (Bates No. EID545556). Memo from Mandrew S Hatten to Robert L Ritchey re Prelim 2nd round results. (Bates No. EID927218). Memo from Robert L Ritchey to Roger Zipfel et al., re RFI Groundwater Data 2nd round. (Bates No. EID927217). Memo from Robert L Ritchey to list, re Portable water well results history. (Bates No. USEPA15050-USEPA15051). Interoffice memo from Daniel A Weber to Robert L Ritchey and John M Migliore. re: C-8 in East Field Wells. (Bates No. USEPA10517USEPA10520). Interoffice memo from Daniel A Weber to Distribution. re: C-8 in Drinking water- FYI. (Bates No. EID073298-EID073299). Interoffice memo from Robert L Ritchey to Didtribution re: More C-8 results. (Bates No. USEPA15047-USEPA15051). Battelle, Collection and Handling of Water Samples For The Multi-Cities Project. (Bates No. EID192581-EID192586). Letter from John H Little (DuPont) to Dallas Silverstone (GE). re: Results for GE sample collected 6/3/99 Report.. (Bates No. EID089407EID089415). David A Ellis et al., Development of an 19F NMR Methid for the Analysis of Fluorinated Acids in Environmental Water Samples, Anal Chem, 2000, 72, pp. 726-731. (Bates No. EID525699-EID525705). Email from Andrew S Hartman to Robert L Ritchey et al., re: FC-143 A126 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 211 of 326 PAGEID #: 40373 ^ 1/13/2000 1/19/2000 2/17/2000 2/17/2000 2/22/2000 3/13/2000 4/3/2000 9/5/2000 10/4/2000 9/14/2000 10/3/2000 10/31/2000 11/25/2000 11/29/2000 \ TRILLIUM,, Analysis Methods. (Bates No. EID072378-EOD072380). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Harry D Aucoin re: FC-143 Analysis Methods. (Bates No. EID545549-EID545550). Email from J S Kauffman (Lancaster). to Michael D Aucoin re Determination of FC143 in water. (Bates No. EID525499-EID525500). Letter from R L Ritcher to James C Cox (Lubeck). re LPSD Water Sample Results 1/19/2000 with attached Lancaster Form I. (Bates No.USEPA8861-USEPA8864). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Andrew S Hartten re Determination of FC143 in water. (Bates No. EID545545-EID545548). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Andrew S Hartten re Determination of FC143 in water. (Bates No. EID545540-EID545543). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Andrew S Hartten re Method Development Status FC143 in water. (Bates No. EID545504EID545508). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Andrew S Hartten re FC-143 Analysis. (Bates No. EID545534). Lancaster Labs Form I for samples collected 8/15/00. (Bates No. USEPA8936-USEPA8938). Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck). re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 8/15/00. (Bates No. EID185155EID185160). Email from R L Ritchey to David Ramsey re: GE Sampling results sampled 8/15/00. (Bates No. EID167436-EID167437). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Roger J Zipfel re Laboratory Proposal FC-143. (Bates No. EID545530). Lubeck Newsletter to customers. Jon S Kauffman, Lancaster Labs, Determination of FC-143 in Water: PBMS Method Development and Validation. (Bates No. EID525526EID525531). Email from S Mark Kennedy to John C Oconnor et al., l re Analytical A127 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 212 of 326 PAGEID #: 40374 1/29/2001 3/26/2001 4/2/2001 4/16/2001 4/10/2001 4/12/2001 4/25/2001 4/26/2001 5/1/2001 5/7/2001 5/17/2001 5/25/2001 6/18/2001 Meeting with Jack Henion of ABS. (Bates No. EID526749-EID526750 & GK005719-GK005720). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Harry L Gearhart re FC-143 Method development. (Bates No. EID525536-EID525538). Letter from Andrew S Harten to USEPA Region III re: Groundwater Monitoring Progress Report. (Bates No. EDD0022860-EDD0022877). Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck). re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 2/28/01. (Bates No. EID185166EID185171). Email from Andrew S Hartten to R L Ritchey re: FC-143 Method Developement (Bates No. EDD0023058). Letter from Andrew S Harten to USEPA Region III re: Groundwater Monitoring Progress Report. (Bates No. EID5404660-EDD0022877). Letter from George Woytowich to Barbara A Gerlach (Mt. Alto, WV).I re: Results taken at well. (Bates No. EID167494-EDD167495). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Harry L Gearhart re FC-143 exec summary. (Bates No. EID525542-EID525543). Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck). re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 10/31/00. (Bates No. EID185172EID185181). Email from Michael P Sherrier to Alison A Crane re: WW 2000 GW Update. (Bates No. EID540797-EID5408201). Email from Bernard Reilly to Bernie Reilly re: Results in analytical technique too low. FC-143 Comparison Results from historic SOP and proposed SOP 1Q01. (Bates No. EDD0074006). Letter from R L Ritchey to WV-DEP re: Quaterly Sampling Results sampled on 4/11/01. (Bates No. EID185166-EID185171). Severn Trent, Technical and Business Proposal for The Development of PFOA Analysis in Drinking Water and Ground Water. (Bates No. EID525610-EID525670). A128 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 213 of 326 PAGEID #: 40375 ^ 7/18/2001 7/17/2001 7/30/2001 8/9/2001 9/17/2001 9/19/2001 10/1/2001 10/3 & 10/5/2001 10/4/2001 10/12/2000 10/13/2001 10/17/2001 10/18/2001 10/19/2001 10/20/2001 \ TRILLIUM,, Letter from R L Ritchey to James C Cox (Lubeck). re: LPSD Water Sample Analytical Results sampled on 6/15/01. (Bates No. EID718144EID718149). Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group Technical Working Group. (Bates No. EID253097-EID718149253100). Email from Mary A Kaiser to L William Buxton re: PFOA Measurement Methods. (Bates NO. EID253102). Email from H David Ramsey to Paul J Bossert et al. re: Conference call 8/15 and preliminary results. (Bates No. EID222899). Email from Bogdan Szostek to John A Wilkens re: Results. (Bates No. EID595603-EID595605). Lancaster laboratory Form Is for Lubeck samples collected 8/14/01. (Bates No. CF016692-CF016695). Table of Historical APFO Monitoring Data for Drinking Water Sources from 1984 to 2000. (Bates No. EID192481-EID192482). Emails from and to John A Wilkens re: APFP Test Samples (Bates No. EID595602). Email from Benard Reilly to M Ann Bradley et al. re: HPLC/MS/MS concerns at Region 3. (Bates NO. EDD0076288). Email from Benard J Reilly to Bernie Reiley re: Meeting with EPA (Bates NO. EDD0076764??). Email from Benard J Reilly to Bernie Reiley re: Meeting with West Virginia Regulators Email from Benard J Reilly to Andrea V Malinowski re:Agenda for 10/19 meeting (Bates NO. EDD0076852). Email from Paul J Bossert from Benard J Reilly re:Preliminary LPSD/WWE Results from Exygen Labs. (Bates NO. EDD0076881). Email from Bogdan Szostek to William B Bazela re: First set of samples from Sept 2001. (Bates NO. EID595548-EID595551). Email from Benard J Reilly to Bernie Reiley re: Drinking water results from newer method. A129 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 214 of 326 PAGEID #: 40376 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 10/22/2001 10/31/2001 10/15/2001 11/15/2001 11/16/2001 11/28/2001 12/2001 12/10/2001 12/10/2001 12/13/2001 1/4/2002 1/10/2002 1/11/2002 Email from John Flaherty to Mary A Kaiseri re:Exygen PFOA Water Method (Bates NO. EID525770-EID525801). Email from Mary A Kaiseri to John R Bowman re: Lancaster Labs FC143 SOP. (Bates NO. EID525770-EID525801). Exygen Research Analytical Report for 10/11/01 samples. (Bates NO. EID185019-EID185152). Dupont Washington Works C-8 Sampling Methodology. (Bates NO. EID 192579-EID192580). Severn Trent, Technical Proposal and QC Module for The Development of PFOA Analysis in Drinking Water and Ground Water, Revision 2. (Bates No. EID525873-EID525898). Email from Benard J Reilly to Bernie Reiley re: Public meeting. (Bates NO. EDD00?879?). Exygen, Method of Analysis for the Determination of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Water. (Bates No. EID525935EID525971). In 12/5/01 Email from Mary A Kaiser to Harry L Gearhart. Analytical White Paper with Draft Determining Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Processing Aids- A Guidance Document from Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group. (Bates No. EID609243EID609269). John A Wilkens (DuPont), APFO Adsorption Isotherms on Granular Activated Carbon. (Bates No. DJM000321-DJM000342). Severn Trent, Technical and QC Module for The Development of PFOA Analysis in Drinking Water and Ground Water, Revision 3. (Bates No. EID525873-EID525898). Email from Andrew S Hartten to Benard J Reilly re: Little Hocking PSD Preliminary Results sampled 12/20/01. (Bates No. EID586989EID586990). Exygen, Method of Analysis for the Determination of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Water. (Bates No. EDD0029991EDD0030019). Exygen, Method of Analysis for the Determination of Ammonium A130 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 215 of 326 PAGEID #: 40377 ~ Vt r il l iu m Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Water. (Bates No. EID546037EID546063). 1/11/2002 Email from Barbara S Lawson to A Bradley re: Analytical measurement Request. (Bates No. EDD0030020-EDD0030021). 1/16/2004 Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group Agenda (Bates No. EID253072EID253091). 1/22/2002 to C-8 Results for Little Hocking Water Association 8/29/2003 1/28/2002 Email from Maary A Kaiser to Rick Gazzini (Exygen). re: Final PFOA Analytical Method. (Bates No. EDD0030157-EDD0030158). 2/1/2002 Email from Rick Gazzini (Exygen). to Mary A Kaiser re: Final PFOA Analytical Method. (Bates No. EDD0030189-EDD0030190). 3/6/2002 Email from Linda A Wrightson to Mary A Kaiser re: Alterations to Contract. (Bates No. EDD0030311-EDD0030327). 3/21/2002 Email from Scott A Mabury to Jean-Marie Libre re: New Technologies for Investigating Fluorotelomer Sulfactants. (Bates No. EDD0030328EDD0030345). 3/28/2002 Severn Trent, Methof Validation Study for Analysis of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Waters by LC/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. (Bates No. MAK007462--MAK007504). 4/16/2002 Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: Lubeck, Belpre, and Tuppers Public Service District Sampling Results sampled on 3/21. (Bates No. EID598321-EID598343). 5/3/2002 Email from Michael D Aucointo Harry L Gearhart re:Hanson Article PFOA. (Bates No. EID546803). 7/31/2002 Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: Public Water Supply Resilts, West Viriginia, and Ohio. (Bates No. OEPA2766-OEPA2770). 8/19/2002 Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group.,Determining Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Processing Aids- A Guidance Document (Bates No. EID653609-EID656626). 8/30/2002 Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group.,Determining Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Processing Aids- A Guidance Document, Draft (Bates A131 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 216 of 326 PAGEID #: 40378 ^ 9/20/2002 10/4/2002 10/8/2002 10/30/2002 11/14/2002 12/2002 2003 5/20/2003 8/2003 10/17/2003 10/23/2003 1/14/2004 \ TRILLIUM,, No. EID603099-EID603114). DuPont map of sampling locations. Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: 3Q02 Public Water Supply Resilts, West Viriginia, and Ohio for sample collected 7/24/02. (Bates No. EID71369 & EID717377). Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group.,Determining Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Processing Aids- A Guidance Document (Bates No. EID610773-EID610791). Email from Marle Martinko to Morandi Francesco et al. re: FMG-TWGAWG Meeting and Analytical Method Reviews on 11/8/02. (Bates No. EID611122-EID611145). Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group.,Determining Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Processing Aids- A Guidance Document (Bates No. EID6111237-EID611253). NEIC, USEPA Report for Split Samples collected 4/23 & 4/24/02. (Bates No. EID735480-EID735386). Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Group.,Determining Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Processing Aids- A Guidance Document (Bates No. EID740005-EID740017). Affidavit of Andrew Hartten WVDEP Ammonium Perfluorooctonate (C-8). Groundwater Investigation Steering Team Report. (Bates No. WVDEP17857-WVDEP17858). Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: 3Q02 Public Water Supply Resilts, West Viriginia, and Ohio. (Bates No. EID731402 & EID713408). Letter from Andrew S Hartten to Ohio EPA re: Stability Testing for Ammonium Perfluorooctonate (APFO). in Water. (Bates No. OEPA6823-OEPA6880). Letter from Andrew S Hartten to WV-DEP re: 4Q02 Public Water Supply Resilts, West Viriginia, and Ohio. (Bates No. WVDEP18285WVDEP18290 ). 3M, Extraction of Perfluorooctonate and related Fluorochemical Compounds from Serum for Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Tandem A132 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 217 of 326 PAGEID #: 40379 ^ 9/8/1999 9/8/1999 7/28/1998 9/7/2000 9/6/2000 11/29/2000 5/5/1996 5/17/1999 5/21/1999 12/11/2001 \ TRILLIUM,, Mass Spectrometry, Method No. ETS-8-49.0.. (Bates No. EID126946EID126952). 3M, Analysis of Perfluorooctonate and related Fluorochemical Compounds from Serum Extracts Using HPLC-Electrospray/Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Method No. ETS-8-50.0.. (Bates No. EID126953EID126959). 3M, Extraction of Anonic Fluorochemical Sulfactants From Waste and Ground Water Samples, Method No. ETS-8-106.0.. (Bates No. EID126960-EID126966). 3M, Analysis of Potassium Perfluorooctonesulfonate and Other Fluorochemical Compounds from Serum Extracts Using HPLCElectrospray/Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Method No. ETS-8-110.0.. (Bates No. EID126967-EID126975). S A Malbury, et al., Perfluorinated Sulfactants in Environmental Samples: Analysis by LC/MS/MS, Abstract from Analysis of Emerging Contaminants Using LC/MS/MS, ACS Orlando, FL 4/7-11/2002. Email from Stephen R Peck to Beckey Szakats Dines et al., re: pathforward and problems with determination of C8 in air. (Bates No. EID 164735-EID164736). Email from Judy Stadler to S Mark Kennedy re: Wickbold Torch Total Fluorine Analysis. (Bates No. EID159550-EID159550). Email from John C Oconnor to S Mark Kennedy re: Wickbold Torch Total Fluorine Analysis. (Bates No. EID159546-EID159547). Email from S Mark Kennedy to John C Oconnor et al., re: Analytical Meeting with Jack Herion of ABS. (Bates No. EID158280-EID158281). Email from Susan S Mileti to Mary A Kaiser re: CCAS checklist for contract laboratories. (Bates No. EID157302-EID157305). Email from Mary A Kaiser to Susan S Mileti re: Trip Report-National Medical Services laboratory. (Bates No.EID156859, EID156846EID16849). Email from Mary A Kaiser to Susan S Mileti re: C-8 Analysis. (Bates No.EID156863). Letter from Matthew McMullin (National Medical Services, Inc.). to A133 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 218 of 326 PAGEID #: 40380 11/15/2001 5/17/1999 9/11/1998 3/18/1997 7/1979 4/29/1998 3/28/2002 4/19/2002 Mary A Kaiser (DuPont) re:PFOA Method Change Proposal (Bates No. EID174040-EID174048). Dupont Washington Works C-8 Sampling Methodology. (Bates NO. EID 192579-EID192580). Batetelle, Collection and Handling of Water Samples For The Multi Cities Project. (Bates No. EID192581-EID192586). V Glockner et al., The Chemical and Thermal Stability of Flurinated Sulfactsants, Tenside Sulfactants Deterg., 1989, 26(6)., pp. 376-380. (Bates No. EID212343-EID212363). University of Delaware C8 Study. (Bates No. EID212859-EID212872). 19F NMR Results. (Bates No. EID213389-EID213390). 3M, Perfluorated C8 Acid, its Salt or the Aqueous Saot % Composition by GC. (Bates No. EID213467-EID213472). Measurements of Fluorochemicals in Blood, Presentation, Arlington VA. (Bates No. EID213799-EID212872). D. van Battum, et al., Central Institute for Nutrition and Food Research, Determination of Possible Residues of Monomers and C8-Emulsifiers in Various Perfluorocarbon Polymers. (Bates No. EID214945-EID214955). DuPont Determination of C8 Dispersing Agent in Water: Blue Dye Colormetric Method. (Bates No. EID214971-EID214979). W S Guy et al., Organic Fluorocompounds in Human Plasma: Prevalence and Characterization. (Bates No. EID215140-EID215157). K. Shinoda et al., Physicochemical properties of aqueous solutions of fluorinated surfactantsJ Phys Chem 1972, 76(6)., pp 909-914. (Bates No. EID 173943-EID173944). Severn Trent, Methof Validation Study for Analysis of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Waters by LC/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. (Bates No. MAK007462--MAK007504). Email from M Ann Bradley to John Benedick re: DAQ/Dupont Meeting on 4/24/02. (Bates No. BJR000821-BJR000832). STL Table ofCC results and MDL measurements for PFOA from 10/01 A134 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 219 of 326 PAGEID #: 40381 _ May 2001 1/10/2002 3/24/2002 12/17/2001 4/24/2002 3/13/2002 3/27/2002 12/1982 6/9/1987 8/31/1992 ^ Tt r il l iu m , and 11/01, (Bates No. HGL001870-HGL001871). US Dept of Health and Human Services, Guidance for Industry Bioanalytical Method Validation. (Bates No. HGL001889-HGL001913). Exygen, Method of Analysis for the Determination of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Water. (Bates No. HGL002035HGL002062). Johathan W Martin, Collection of Airborne Fluorinated Organics and Analysis by Gas Chromatography-Chemical Ionization-Mass Spectrometry. (Bates No. HGL002063-HGL002085). James Franklin, Screening Assessment of the Potential for Long-Range Atmospheric Transport of Perfluorooctanoic Acid. (Bates No. DJM000147-DJM000155). DuPont, Emission Modeling Data Required in Consent Order GWR2001-019 Section VII.D. (Bates No. DJM000280-DJM000320). David A Ellis et al., Thermolysis of Fluoropolymers as a Potential Source of Halogenated Organic Acids in the Environment, Nature, July 19, 2001, 412, pp. 321-324. (Bates No. DJM001027-DJM001030). Phase Diagram of C-8. (Bates No. DJM001031-DJM001063). Debbie Mulrooney, DuPont Modeling Methodology and Results. (Bates No. DJM001064-DJM001076). Letter from M Ann Bradley to WV-DEP DuPont's with attached Response to 2/19/02 Additional Information Request. (Bates No. STB004018STB004024-DJM001030). Letter from Robert F Pinchot to WV-DEP re Additional information Request Dated 2/19/02. (Bates No. STB0040250STB004068DJM001030). S S Stafford (DuPont), Method for the Determination of Perofluorooctonate in Blood, Water, and Other Materials.(Bates No. EID2529536--EID252962). Letter from H A Smith to R C Graham and G L Kennedy re AEL and CEG Requests, (Bates No. EID229344--EID229347). CH2M Hill, Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Soil/Sediment. A135 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 220 of 326 PAGEID #: 40382 10/1991 5/20/1999 6/4/1999 6/4/1999 8/6/1999 2/15/2001 1/13/2000 1/14/2000 2/22/2000 4/6/2000 5/4/2000 (Bates No. EID149474-EID149508). CH2M Hill, Low Level Determination of FC-143 in Water. (Bates No. EID149509-EID1495550). Cheryl A Moody and Jennifer A Field, Determination of Perfluorocarboxylates in Groundwater Impacted by Fire-Fighting Activity, ES&T,1999, 33(16). pp. 2800-2806. (Bates No. EID152594EID152600). Environmental Standards, Inc., QA Review of the RFI Groundwater 2nd Round Samples Collected on 2/2 and 2/3/1999. (Bates No. EID149605EID149625). Environmental Standards, Inc., QA Review of the RFI Groundwater 2nd Round Samples Collected on 2/2 and 2/3/1999. (Bates No. EID149552EID149604). Environmental Standards, Inc., QA Review of the RFI Samples Collected on 9/3,4,22,23,24,25,28/1998, 11/17/98, and 11/18/1998, Volume 1-Draft (Bates No. EID149626-EID149737). Lancaster Labs,FC-143 in Water/Wastewater, Analysis #2324 Rev. 1. (Bates No. EID124568-EID124577). Lancaster Labs,Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater, Analysis #2325FC Rev 3 (Bates No. EID124578EID124593). Lancaster Labs,GC/MS Confirmation of FC-143 in Water/Wastewater, Analysis #0495 Rev. 1 (Bates No. EID124594-EID124606). Email from Andrew S Hartman to Robert L Ritchey et al., re: FC-143 Analysis Methods. (Bates No. EID159341-EOD159343). Email from Andrew S Hartman to Michael D Aucoin et al., re: FC-143 Analysis Methods. (Bates No. EID156383-EOD156386). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Andrew S Hartten re FC143 Method Developement. (Bates No. EID156391-EID156394). Email from Andrew S Hartman to Michael D Aucoin re: FC-143 Method Developement. (Bates No. EID156397). Email from Andrew S Hartman to Robert L Ritchey re: FC-143 Method A136 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 221 of 326 PAGEID #: 40383 ^ 10/3/2000 11/29/2000 11/28/2000 4/3/2001 4/3/2001 4/9/2001 10/4/1999 3/13/2000 5/3/2000 1/29/2001 2/15/2001 4/25/2001 8/6/1999 \ TRILLIUM,, Developement. (Bates No. EID156398-EID156399). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Roger J Zipfel re Laboratory Proposal FC-143. (Bates No. EID163902). Email from S Mark Kennedy to John C Oconnor et al., re: Analytical Meeting with Jack Herion of ABS. (Bates No. EID152281-EID152582). Lancaster Labs, Draft Proposal Determ ination of FC-143 in Water: PBMS Method Development and Validation. (Bates No. EID150093EID150285). Lancaster Labs,Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater. (Bates No. EID150103-EID150113). Lancaster Labs, FC-143 in Water and Wastewater by GC/MS. (Bates No. EID150114-EID1501126). Lancaster Labs, FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by SPME/GCMS, (Analysis #0615)." Rev 1 (Bates No. EID150131-EID150147). M. N. Sarrion, F. J. Santos, and M. T. Galceran, titled "In Situ Derivatization/Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Haloacetic Acids in Water," and published in Analytical Chemistry, 72 (20)., pages 4865-4873, 2000. (Bates No. EID150145-EID150173). Email from N. J. Bornholm (Lancaster). to Michael D Aucoin re: FC143. (Bates No. EID150418). Email from J S Kauffman (Lancaster). to Michael D Aucoin re Determination of FC143 in Water. (Bates No. EID150432-EID150437). Email from J S Kauffman (Lancaster). to Michael D Aucoin re Method Development Update. (Bates No. EID150428-EID150431). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Harry L Gearhart re FC-143 Method development. (Bates No. EID150410-EID150412). Email from J S Kauffman (Lancaster). to Michael D Aucoin re FC-143 Standards. (Bates No. EID150286). Email from Michael D Aucoin to Harry L Gearhart re FC-143 exec summary. (Bates No. EID150414-EID150417). Lancaster Labs,FC-143 in Water/Wastewater, Analysis #2324 Rev. 1. A137 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 222 of 326 PAGEID #: 40384 10/3/2000 4/9/2001 5/23/2001 10/27/2000 2/15/2001 5/23/2001 5/23/2001 5/3/2001 7/2000 ~ Vt r il l iu m (Bates No. EID149448-EID149458). Fax from Mike Aucoin to Harry Gearhart re FC-143 Info from Lancaster. (Bates No. EID149397-EID149400). Lancaster,Procedure Amendment #1 FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by SPME/GCMS, Analysis #0615, Rev. 1. (Bates No. EID149355). Lancaster, FC-143 in Water/Wastewater by GCMS, Analysis #0616 Rev 1 (Bates No. EID149356-EID149368). Letter from Jon S Kauffman (Lancaster). to Michael Aucoin (Woodward Clyde). re Proposal for Confirmation of GC/ECD Results for FC-143 in Water by GC/MS, (Bates No. EID149412-EID149428). Lancaster Labs,GC/MS Confirmation of FC-143 in Water/Wastewater, Analysis #0495 Rev. 1 (Bates No. EID149417-EID149429). Lancaster, Quad and MDL Studies. (Bates No. EID149380-EID149396). Lancaster Labs, FC-143 Method & Evaluation: Executive Summary Bates No. EID149336-EID149354). Lancaster Labs,Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater, Analysis #0813FC Rev 1 (Bates No. EID149369EID149379). Lancaster Labs,Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater, Analysis #2325FC Rev 2 (Bates No. EID149401EID149411). Lancaster Labs,Extraction of Low Level FC-143 in Water and Wastewater, Analysis #2325FC Rev 3 (Bates No. EID149459EID149473). Email from Robert F Pinchot to Thomas F Mistretta re Slides for AEL & CEG Presentation (Bates No. EID303234-EID30343). 3M, Extraction of Perfluorooctonate and related Fluorochemical Compounds from Serum for Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Method No. ETS-8-49.0.. (Bates No. EID152546EID152559). Perfluoorganics (July 2000). re: Wickbold Torch Total Fluorine Analysis. (Bates No. EID152601-EID152622). A138 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 223 of 326 PAGEID #: 40385 ^ \ TRILLIUM,, 11/15/2000 1/2002 8/31/2001 12/17/2001 1/2002 1/11/2002 1/16/2002 2/2002 2/2002 2/2002 3/2002 4/2002 Memo from D Dubois to M Kaiser re: Analysis of Perfluoro-Octanoic Acid Samples (19F). NMR). (Bates No. EID152583-EID152593). DuPont, December 2001 Groundwater Monitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart, and Dry Run Landfills. (Bates No. WVDEP9800-WVDEP9888). Letter from DuPont to EPA Region III, August 31, 2001, Response to Request for Information dated July 24, 2001, Response to Request No. 12. DuPont, Emission Modeling Data Required in Consent Order GWR2001-019 Section VII.D. (Bates No. WVDEP9574-WVDEP9625). Dupont, Groundwater Investigation Quality Assurance Project Plan. (Bates No. WVDEP9246-WVDEP9292 Exygen, Method of Analysis for the Determination of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO). in Water. (Bates No. EID168228EID168260). Fluoropolymer manufacturers Group Meeting, Wilmington, DE. (Bates No. EID253072-EID253091). DuPont, Ohio River Water Sampling Proposal for the Washington Works Facility and the Letart Landfill. (Bates No. WVDEP9236-WVDEP9243). DuPont, February 2002 Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart, and Dry Run Landfills. (Bates No. WVDEP9327-WVDEP9711). Compilation of Historical C-8 Data Dupont Washington Works Main Plant and Landfills.(Bates No. MAH000429-MAH000564). DuPont, January 2002 Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart, and Dry Run Landfills. (Bates No. WVDEP9713-WVDEP9798). DuPont, One-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Report and Ohio River Public Water Sampling. (Bates No. WVDEP9153-WVDEP9235). Subasg Gang, Importance of APFO in Dispersion Polomerization and DuPont Research on Alternatives. (Bates No. EID153021-EID153036 Kevin M. Leyden and Alan Ducatman, West Virginia University, A139 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 224 of 326 PAGEID #: 40386 7/7/2004 8/11/2004 10/2/2008 ~ Vt r il l iu m "Chronicle of the C8 Health Project" US EPA, Complaint and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, In the matter of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Wilmington, DE, Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016. DuPont, Answer and Request for Hearing, In the matter of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Wilmington, DE, Docket No. TSCA-HQ2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016. Data Assessment DuPont Washington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program), DuPont Corporate Remediation Group. (Bates No. ROWE039818-ROWE039969B). A140 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 225 of 326 PAGEID #: 40387 REFERENCES Benskin, Jonathan P., Perfluorinated Acid Isomer Profiling in Water and Quantitative Assessment of Manufacturing Source, Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44, pp. 9049-9054 and supporting information at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/es102582x. Benskin, Jonathan P., et al., Manufacturing Origin of Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in Atlantic and Canadian Arctic Seawater, Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46, pp. 677-685. Buck, Robert C., et al., Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the Environment: Terminology, Classification, and Origins, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2011, 7(4), pp. 513-541. Cheng, Jie, Elefteria Psillakis, M. R. Hoffmann, and A. J. Colussi, Acid Dissociation versus Molecular Association of Perfluoroalkyl Oxoacids: Environmental Implications, J. Phys Chem A, 2009, 113, pp. 8152-8156. Dean, John A. "Analytical Chemistry Handbook," 1995, McGraw-Hill, Inc. EPA/600/R-08/092 Method 537, Determination of Selected Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids in Drinking Water by Solid Phase Extraction and Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), in September 2009. http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/190acidrain.html. Larsen, Barbara S., and Mary A. Kaiser, Challenges in Perfluorocarboxylic Acid Measurements, Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 79 (11), pp. 3966-3973. Lehmler H.J., Production of Fluorinated Surfactants by electrochemical Fluorination, In: Zoller U, Sosis P, editors. "Handbook of Detergents," Part F, 2009, CRC, p. 314-315. Martin, Jonathan W., et al., Analytical Challenges Hamper Perfluoroalkyl Research, Environmental Science and Technology, 2004, 38 (13), pp. 248A-255A. Mitchell, Shannon M., et al., Degradation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid by Reactive Species Generated through Catalyzed H2O2Propagation Reactions, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2014, 1, pp. 117-121. Paustenbach, Dennis J. et al., A Methodology for Estimating Human Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA): A Retrospective Exposure Assessment of a Community (1951 2003), Journal o f Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2007, 70, pp. 28-57. Prevedours, Konstantinos, et al. Sources, Fate and Transport of Perfluorocarboxylates, Environmental Science & Technology, 2006 40(1) pp. 32-44. Product Information, 3M FluoradTM Fluorochemical Acid FC-26, July 7, 2000, A141 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 226 of 326 PAGEID #: 40388 http://www.3m.fr/US/mfg_industrial/perfchem/prodinfo/fluoroch/FC26/FC26_1.html. Rayne, Sierra and Kaya Forest, Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonic and Carboxylic Acids: A Critical Review of Physicochemical Properties, Levels and Patterns in Waters and Wastewaters, and Treatment Methods, J. Environ Sci & Health A, 2009, 44, pp. 1145-1199. Russell, Mark H., DuPont Haskell Laboratory for Health and Environmental Sciences, PFOA and PFOS Physical-Chemical Properties, Environmental Fate, Monitoring and Modeling, October 16, 2009, http://www.epa.gov/oppt/pfoa/pubs/Properties%20and%20fate-%. Shin, Hyeong-Moo, et al., Environmental Fate and Transport Modeling for Perfluorooctanoic Acid Emitted from the Washington Works Facility in West Virginia, Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45, pp. 1435-1432. Shin, Hyeong-Moo, et al., Modeling the Air-Soil Transport Pathway of Perfluorooctanoic acid in the Mid-Ohio Valley Using Linked Air Dispersion and Vadose Zone Models, Atmospheric Environmental 2012, 51, pp. 67-74. Shinoda, K., et al., Physicochemical Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Fluorinated Surfactants, J Phys Chem 1972, 76(6), pp 909-914. Smith, J. S., D. Ben-Hur, R. Pavlick, M. Urban, J. LaFornara, R. D. Kleopfer, K. T. Yue, C. J. Kirchmer, W. A. Smith and S. Viswanathan, "Comparison o f a New Rapid Extraction GC/MS/MS and the Contract Laboratory Program GC/MS/MS Methodologies for the Analysis o f 2,3,7,8Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, "189th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Miami Beach, Florida, April 28-May 3, 1985. USEPA Draft Data Quality Objectives for RI/FS Process, November 5, 1985. USEPA SW-846, Chapter One Quality Control, July 1991. USEPA SW-846, Method 8290, Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs)by High-Resolution Gas Chromatography/High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry(HRGC/HRMS), September 1994. USEPA SW-846, Method 3500B, Organic Extraction and Sample Preparation, December 1996. Vierke, Lena, Urs Berger, and Ian T. Cousins, Estimation of the Acid Dissociation Constant of Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids through an Experimental Investigation of their Water-to-Air Transport, Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47, pp. 11032-11039. A142 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 227 of 326 PAGEID #: 40389 Materials Relied on, Reviewed and/or Considered by Expert James Smith All materials referenced and/or discussed within the report are incorporated. In addition to the materials within the report, the other materials relied on, reviewed, and/or considered in the preparation of the expert report are as follows: Bates Numbered Documents 000041 - 000055; GKO012963 -GK012977; EID797665 ________________________ EID797679________________________ _______ 000297 - 00313; ROW E020533 - ROW E020549_______ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 1-0002900 - 0 01-000 1-0002901__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 1-0002982 - 0 01-000 1-0002991__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 1-0005110 - 0 01-000 1-0005111__________ __________ 001-0 0 0 1 -0 0 0 5 9 2 4 - 0 01-000 1-0005926__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 1-0008629 - 0 01-000 1-0008630__________ __________ 001-000 1-0015753 - 0 01-000 1-0015756__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 1-0019652 - 0 01-000 1-0019662__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 1-0020279 - 0 01-000 1-0020280__________ __________ 001-0 0 0 2 -0 0 0 3 5 5 4 - 0 01-000 2-0003560__________ ____________________ 0 0 1 -0 00 4-0000288____________________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 4-0000289 - 0 0 1 -0 00 4-0000304__________ ____________________ 001-000 4-0000859____________________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 00 4-0002221 - 0 0 1 -0 00 4-0002238__________ _____________________ 0 0 1 0 0 8 -0 0 1 0 0 9 _____________________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 13 1-0002070 - 001-013 1-0002073__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 13 1-0002156 -001-013 1-0002162___________ ____________________ 001-013 5-0001272____________________ ____________________ 001-013 5-0001373____________________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 13 5-0001400 - 001-013 5-0001403__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 13 5-0005080 - 0 01-013 5-0005082__________ ____________________ 001-013 5-0005171____________________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 22 9-0000322 - 0 01-022 9-0000327__________ __________ 001-0 2 3 5 -0 0 0 4 1 4 4 - 0 01-023 5-0004151__________ __________ 0 0 1 -0 23 5-0004399 - 0 01-023 5-0004412__________ ____________________ 001-023 5-0008756____________________ __________ 0 0 2 -0 00 1-0000869 - 0 02-000 1-0000871__________ 002-0001-0001107 - 002-0001-0001175; 002-0001-0001210 ____________________ 002-000 1-0001240____________________ __________ 002-000 1-0001775 - 0 0 2 -0 00 1-0001778__________ __________ 0 0 2 -0 00 1-0001991 - 0 02-000 1-0001992__________ __________ 0 0 2 -0 00 1-0011400 - 0 02-000 1-0011402__________ __________ 002-013 1-0011485 - 0 02-013 1-0011486__________ 002-0132-0004846 - 002-0132-0004847 Page 1 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 228 of 326 PAGEID #: 40390 Bates Numbered Documents _______ 002-0 1 3 5 -0 0 0 1 6 7 4 - 0 02-013 5-0001676_______ _________________ 002-013 5-0002420_________________ _______ 0 0 2 -0 13 5-0002421 - 0 02-013 5-0002431_______ _______ 0 0 2 -0 13 5-0002432 - 0 0 2 -0 13 5-0002438 _______ 0 0 2 -0 13 5-0002439 - 0 02-013 5-0002447_______ _______ 002-0 1 3 5 -0 0 0 2 4 4 8 - 002-013 5-0002453_______ _______ 002-0 1 3 5 -0 0 0 2 4 5 4 - 002-013 5-0002455_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0000741 - 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0000754 _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0002377 - 0 03-000 1-0002380_______ _________________ 003-000 1-0005633_________________ _________________ 003-000 1-0005793_________________ _________________ 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0006088_________________ _______ 003-000 1-0010695 - 0 03-000 1-0010697_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0012306 - 0 03-000 1-0012307_______ _________________ 003-000 1-0017196_________________ _________________ 003-000 1-0018397_________________ _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0019691 - 003-000 1-0019693_______ _______ 003-0 0 0 1 -0 0 1 9 6 9 4 - 0 03-000 1-0019697_______ _________________ 003-000 1-0019790_________________ _______ 003-000 1-0024705 - 0 03-000 1-0024707_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 1-0024710 - 0 03-000 1-0024722_______ _______ 003-000 1-0024823 - 0 03-000 1-0024826_______ _________________ 003-000 1-0025133_________________ _______ 003-0 0 0 1 -0 0 2 5 1 5 8 - 0 03-000 1-0025159_______ _________________ 003-000 1-0028763_________________ _________________ 003-000 1-0030170_________________ _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 2-0002591 - 0 03-000 2-0002609_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 00 2-0004602 - 0 03-000 2-0004817_______ _________________ 003-002 9-0001239_________________ _______ 003-002 9-0001263 - 003-002 9-0001285_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 02 9-0001327 - 0 03-002 9-0001329_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 02 9-0001331 - 0 03-002 9-0001350_______ _______ 003-0 0 2 9 -0 0 0 1 4 9 8 - 0 03-002 9-0001507_______ _______ 003-0 0 2 9 -0 0 0 1 5 3 8 - 0 03-002 9-0001539_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 02 9-0002677 - 0 03-002 9-0002679_______ _______ 0 0 3 -0 03 0-0000057 - 0 03-003 0-0000122_______ _______ 003-003 0-0003183 - 0 03-003 0-0003191_______ 003-0030-0003518 - 003-0030-0003522; ROWE010135 _________________ 003-003 0-0003526_________________ _________________ 003-003 0-0003541_________________ _________________ 003-003 0-0003545_________________ _______ 003-003 0-0003575 - 0 03-003 0-0003582_______ _______ 003-0 0 3 1 -0 0 0 1 4 0 4 - 003-003 1-0001405_______ 003-0031-0001412 Page 2 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 229 of 326 PAGEID #: 40391 Bates Numbered Documents __________ 0 0 3 -0 13 1-0000004__________ 003-0131-0005007 - 003-0131-0005010 003-0131-0007086 - 003-0131-0007108 003- 0218-0004895 - 003-0218-0004896 __________ 003-039 4-0000003__________ 004- 0131-0001080 - 004-0131-0001122 __________ 004-013 4-0000046__________ 004-0134-0000056 - 004-0134-0000057 __________ 004-013 4-0000117__________ __________ 004-013 4-0000549__________ __________ 004-013 4-0000626__________ 004-0134-0000638 - 004-0134-0000639 004-0134-0001180 - 004-0134-0001182 004-0134-0002070 - 004-0134-0002072 __________ 004-019 3-0002119__________ 004-0193-0002904 - 004-0193-0002905 004- 0236-0005198 - 004-0236-0005199 005- 0002-0007071 - 005-0002-0007073 005-0343-0000013 - 005-0343-0000033 005-0381-0000001 - 005-0381-0000028 005-0384-0000001 - 005-0384-0000028 005-0385-0000002 - 005-0385-0000004 005-0385-0000005 - 005-0385-0000026 005-0385-0000027 - 005-0385-0000061 005- 0391-0000001 - 005-0391-0000014 ___________ 0 0 5 9 0 2 -0 0 5 9 6 1 ___________ 006- 0002-0000263 - 006-0002-0000265 006-0002-0001093 - 006-0002-0001094 006-0002-0002433 - 006-0002-0002444 006-0002-0002643 - 006-0002-0002676 006-0002-0003383 - 006-0002-0003387 006-0002-0003535 - 006-0002-0003750 006-0002-0003958 - 006-0002-0003971 006-0002-0004206 - 006-0002-0004207 006-0002-0006137 - 006-0002-0006138 006-0002-0006137 - 006-0002-0006138 006-0002-0006147 - 006-0002-0006148 006-0002-0006149 - 006-0002-00051 006-0002-0006156 - 006-0002-0006158 006-0002-0006199 - 006-0002-0006201 006-0002-0006208 - 006-0002-0006209 006-0002-0006230 - 006-0002-0006231 006-0002-0006620 - 006-0002-0006623 006-0002-0006626 - 006-0002-0006627 Page 3 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 230 of 326 PAGEID #: 40392 Bates Numbered Documents 006-0002-0006630 - 006-0002-0006633 __________ 0 0 6 -0 00 2-0006634__________ 006-0002-0006636 - 006-0002-0006637 006-0002-0006638 - 006-0002-0006639 006-0008-0000321 - 006-0008-0000323 006-0008-0001275 - 006-0008-0001318 006-0008-0001328 - 006-0008-0001343 006-0008-0002260 - 006-0008-0002262 006-0008-0002277 - 006-0008-0002281 006-0009-0001200 - 006-0009-0001205 006-0009-0001978 - 006-0009-0001980 006-0009-0002390 - 006-0009-0002395 006-0010-0001407 - 006-0010-0001408 006-0010-0001409 - 006-0010-0001410 006-0010-0001441 - 006-0010-0001442 006-0010-0001444 - 006-0010-0001446 006-0131-0002681 - 006-0131-0002703 006-0131-0008724 - 006-0131-0008730 _________ 006-01 3 3 -0 0 1 1 3 4 1 4 _________ 006-0133-0013864 - 006-0133-0013923 006-0133-0018857 - 006-0133-0018872 __________ 0 0 6 -0 13 3-0019538__________ __________ 006-013 3-0026156__________ __________ 006-013 3-0029171__________ 006-0133-0030806 - 006-0133-0030852 __________ 006-013 3-0032093__________ 006-0133-0032378 - 006-0133-0032379 006-0133-0032680 - 006-0133-0032682 006-0133-0033747 - 006-0133-0033751 006-0133-0035551 - 006-0133-0035597 __________ 006-013 3-0036331__________ 006-0133-0036347 - 006-0133-0036348 __________ 006-013 3-0038585__________ 006-0133-0038948 - 006-0133-0038991 __________ 006-013 3-0040405__________ __________ 006-013 3-0041377__________ 006-0133-0041684 - 006-0133-0041685 __________ 006-013 3-0042683__________ __________ 006-013 3-0042687__________ __________ 006-013 3-0044387__________ 006-0133-0044441 - 006-0133-0044442 006-0133-0044772 - 006-0133-0044773 __________ 006-013 3-0048805__________ 006-0133-0048905 - 006-0133-0048906 Page 4 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 231 of 326 PAGEID #: 40393 Bates Numbered Documents 006-0133-0049232 - 006-0133-0049235 006-0133-0054251 - 006-0133-0054318 006-0133-0055648 - 006-0133-0055653 006-0133-0056447 - 006-0133-0056448 __________ 006-013 3-0058901__________ __________ 0 0 6 -0 13 3-0059404__________ 006-0133-0061386 - 006-0133-0061388 006-0133-0062746 - 006-0133-0062747 __________ 006-013 3-0067336__________ __________ 006-013 3-0070179__________ 006-0133-0070184 - 006-0133-0070185 006-0133-0075582 - 006-0133-0075585 006-0133-0075589 - 006-0133-0075592 006-0133-0075593 - 006-0133-0075596 006-0133-0078559 - 006-0133-0078560 006-0133-0079073 - 006-0133-0079076 __________ 006-013 3-0079597__________ __________ 006-013 3-0079597__________ __________ 006-013 3-0079597__________ 006-0133-0080114 -006-0133-0080118 006-0133-0081003 - 006-0133-0081005 006-0133-0081006 - 006-0133-0081008 006-0133-0081531 - 006-0133-0081532 __________ 0 0 6 -0 13 3-0081568__________ __________ 006-013 3-0083555__________ 006-0133-0083664 - 006-0133-0083665 006-0133-0084066 - 006-0133-0084067 006-0133-0084189 - 006-0133-0084190 006-0133-0084196 - 006-0133-0084197 006-0133-0084219 - 006-0133-0084220 006-0133-0084223 - 006-0133-0084224 006-0133-0085420 - 006-0133-0085421 006-0133-0085984 - 006-0133-0085991 006-0133-0088146 -006-0133-0088151 006-0133-0088168 - 006-0133-0088175 006-0133-0089852 - 006-0133-0089854 006-0133-0090099 - 006-0133-0090100 006-0133-0090109 - 006-0133-0090110 __________ 006-013 3-0090499__________ 006-0133-0092020 - 006-0133-0092021 006-0133-0094043 - 006-0133-0094061 006-0133-0095403 - 006-0133-0095409 006-0133-0095514 - 006-0133-0095519 006-0133-0097263 - 006-0133-0097273 Page 5 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 232 of 326 PAGEID #: 40394 Bates Numbered Documents 006-0133-0100147 - 006-0133-0100150 006-0133-0101622 - 006-0133-0101635 006-0133-0105256 - 006-0133-0105258 006-0133-0105256 - 006-0133-0105258 006-0133-0105889 - 006-0133-0105890 006-0133-0106847 - 006-0133-0106849 __________ 006-013 3-0108123__________ 006-0133-0108754 - 006-0133-0108757 __________ 0 0 6 -0 13 3-0109464__________ __________ 006-013 3-0111481__________ 006-0133-0114956 - 006-0133-0114957 __________ 006-013 3-0119725__________ 006-0133-0121130 - 006-0133-0121131 __________ 006-013 3-0122229__________ 006-0133-0128457 - 006-0133-0128503 006-0133-0128666 - 006-0133-0128668 006-0133-0136807 - 006-0133-0136816 006-0133-0136817 - 006-0133-0136818 __________ 006-013 3-0137412__________ 006-0133-0137468 - 006-0133-0137469 006-0133-0142377 - 006-0133-0142378 006-0133-0143695 - 006-0133-0143703 006-0133-0143704 - 006-0133-0143719 006-0133-0144756 - 006-0133-0144785 006-0133-0144756 - 006-0133-0144785 006-0133-0146078 - 006-0133-0146086 006-0133-0146157 - 006-0133-0146159 006-0133-0147203 - 006-0133-0147205 006-0133-0147776 - 006-0133-0147777 __________ 006-023 1-0000291__________ 006-0231-0001201 - 006-0231-0001260 006-0231-0001927 - 006-0231-0001928 006-0231-0002078 - 006-0231-0002089 __________ 0 0 6 -0 23 6-0004618__________ 006-0236-0005194 - 006-0236-0005195 006-0236-0009848 - 006-0236-0009849 006-0236-0019605 - 006-0236-0020023 006-0380-0000010 - 006-0380-0000015 006-0380-0000043 - 006-0380-0000070 006-0386-0000015 - 006-0386-0000039 006-0394-0000065 - 006-0394-0000076 008-0001-0014975 - 008-0001-0014988 008-0001-0018112 - 008-0001-0018113 008-0020-0000400 - 008-0020-0000405 Page 6 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 233 of 326 PAGEID #: 40395 Bates Numbered Documents 008-0020-0000421 - 008-0020-0000424 008-0020-0000426 - 008-0020-0000427 008- 0020-0000428 - 008-0020-0000431 __________ 008-013 5-0000186__________ __________ 008-037 2-0000006__________ __________ 009-013 9-0003342__________ 009- 0139-0003409 - 009-0139-0003411 009-0139-0003437 - 009-0139-0003438 009- 0139-0008990 - 009-0139-0008991 010- 0158-0019495 - 010-0158-0019496 010-0243-0002258 - 010-0243-0002259 __________ 010-036 0-0000001__________ 010- 0400-0000001 - 010-0400-0000003 __________ 011-000 1-0003496__________ __________ 011-000 1-0003811__________ 011- 0161-0000326 - 011-0161-0000327 011-0161-0001460 - 011-0161-0001461 __________ 011-016 1-0003601__________ 013-0002-0001044 - 013-0002-0001045 013- 0242-0009863 - 013-0242-0009864 __________ 0 1 4 -0 00 2-0019144__________ 014- 0002-0023167 - 014-0002-0023169 __________ 014-034 3-0000010__________ 014- 0389-0000527 - 014-0389-0000535 015- 0002-0003114 - 015-0002-0003117 ___________ 0 16-000 -0005698___________ 016- 0002-0000447 - 016-0002-0000453 016-0002-0001783 - 016-0002-0001784 016-0002-0006573 - 016-0002-0006577 016-0002-0007970 - 016-0002-0007988 __________ 016-000 2-0010950__________ 022-0044-0000146 - 022-0044-0000149 022-0044-0000248 - 022-0044-0000291 __________ 022-004 4-0000466__________ __________ 022-004 4-0000467__________ __________ 0 2 2 -0 04 4-0000468__________ 022-0044-0001503 - 022-0044-0001511 022-0044-0001512 - 022-0044-0001515 __________ 022-004 4-0001516__________ 022-0045-0000026 - 022-0045-0000032 __________ 022-004 5-0001129__________ 022-0045-0001364 - 022-0045-0001379 __________ 022-004 5-0001401__________ 022-0045-0001403 Page 7 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 234 of 326 PAGEID #: 40396 Bates Numbered Documents 022-0045-0002285 - 022-0045-0002287 022-0046-0000177 - 022-0046-0000178 022-0046-0000179 - 022-0046-0000182 022-0046-0000191 - 022-0046-0000192 __________ 022-004 6-0000209__________ __________ 022-004 6-0000212__________ 022-0046-0000213 - 022-0046-0000214 022-0046-0000727 - 022-0046-0000728 022-0046-0001353 - 022-0046-0001354 022-0046-0001490 - 022-0046-0001495 022-0046-0001500 - 022-0046-0001501 022-0046-0001506 - 022-0046-0001507 __________ 0 2 2 -0 04 6-0001508__________ 022-0046-0002006 - 022-0046-0002013 __________ 022-004 6-0002067__________ __________ 0 2 2 -0 04 6-0002068__________ 022-0046-0002069 - 022-0046-0002075 __________ 022-004 6-0002076__________ __________ 022-004 6-0002077__________ 022-0046-0002458 - 022-0046-0002459 022-0047-0000366 - 022-0047-0000368 022-0047-0000571 - 022-0047-0000574 022-0047-0000575 - 022-0047-0000576 022-0047-0000614 - 022-00470000616 022-0047-0000617 - 022-00470000632 022-0047-0000633 - 022-0047-0000637 022-0047-0000638 - 022-0047-0000644 022-0047-0000645 -022-0047-0000652 022-0047-0000700 - 022-0047-0000703 022-0047-0001035 - 022-0047-0001037 __________ 022-004 7-0001122__________ 022-0047-0001141 - 022-0047-0001151 022-0047-0001152 - 022-0047-0001156 022-0047-0001678 - 022-0047-0001679 022-0047-0001686 - 022-0047-0001688 022-0047-0001695 - 022-0047-0001696 022-0047-0001705 - 022-0047-0001724 022-0047-0001786 - 022-0047-0001789 022-0048-0001522 - 022-0048-0001524 __________ 022-004 8-0001525__________ 022-0049-0000098 - 022-0049-0000101 022-0049-0000555 - 022-0049-0000560 022-0233-0001409 - 022-0233-0001415 022-0233-0003695 - 022-0233-0003698 Page 8 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 235 of 326 PAGEID #: 40397 Bates Numbered Documents _________ 0 2 2 -0 23 3-0006102 - 022-023 3-0006103__________ _________ 022-023 3-0010063 - 0 2 2 -0 23 3-0010064_________ ____________________024-034 2-0000005____________________ ____________________ 026-061 -0000053____________________ _________ 0 3 1 -0 00 2-0001352 - 0 3 1 -0 00 2-0001354_________ _________ 031-000 2-0001363 - 0 31-000 2-0001366_________ 031-0074-0000033 - 031-0074-0000041; 031-0074-0000033 031-0149-0003075 - 031-0149-0003076 052- 0121-0000236 - 052-0121-0000246 053- 0001-0001409 - 053-0001-0001410 053-0001-0003061 - 053-0001-0003065 053-0001-0003070 - 053-0001-0003072 053-0001-0003079 - 053-0001-0003085 053-0001-0003491 - 053-0001-0003491 __________ 053-000 1-0005085__________ __________ 053-000 1-0005472__________ 053-0001-0006778 - 053-001-0006779 053-0001-0012164 - 053-0001-0012166 053-0001-0012216 - 053-0001-0012218 __________ 0 5 3 -0 00 1-0018768__________ __________ 053-000 1-0018921__________ __________ 053-000 1-0019235__________ __________ 053-000 1-0026757__________ __________ 0 5 3 -0 00 1-0026758__________ 053- 001-0019259 - 053-0001-0019260 __________ 053-021 5-0005779__________ 054- 0001-0000203 - 054-0001-0000205 054-0001-0000332 - 054-0001-0000334 054-0001-0012821 - 054-0001-0012822 054-0034-0001128 - 054-0034-0001133 054-0169-0008864 - 054-0169-0008866 054-0215-0002024 - 054-0215-0002027 __________ 054-036 1-0000001__________ 058-0265-0000081 - 058-0265-0000104 __________ 060-000 1-0009293__________ 060-0001-0014287 - 060-0001-0014289 060-0001-0022196 - 060-0001-0022198 __________ 060-000 1-0022735__________ 060-0001-0022737 - 060-0001-0022744 060-0001-0022824 - 060-0001-0022828 060-0001-0022960 - 060-0001-0022963 060-0001-0023732 - 060-0001-0023734 060-0001-0023760 - 060-0001-0023762 Page 9 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 236 of 326 PAGEID #: 40398 Bates Numbered Documents __________ 060-000 1-0023817__________ 060-0001-0024060 - 060-0001-0024066 060-0001-0024203 - 060-0001-0024205 060-0001-0024210 - 060-0001-0024211 060-0001-0024283 - 060-0001-0024284 060-0001-0050334 - 060-0001-0050338 __________ 060-000 1-0050599__________ __________ 060-000 1-0050626__________ 060-0002-0011197 - 060-0002-0011199 __________ 0 6 0 -0 00 2-0011438__________ 060-0002-0012843 - 060-0002-0012848 060-0002-0012849 - 060-0002-0012862 060-0035-0000001 - 060-0035-0000068 060-0035-0000001 - 060-0035-0000068 __________ 060-003 6-0002297__________ 060-0149-0003330 - 060-0149-0003349 060-0149-0003331 - 060-0149-000337 060-0149-0003338 - 060-0149-0003349 __________ 060-017 0-0007797__________ 060-0170-0007799 - 060-0170-0007803 __________ 060-017 0-0007876__________ 060-0208-0000004 - 060-0208-0000005 __________ 060-020 8-0000006__________ __________ 060-020 8-0000007__________ __________ 0 6 0 -0 20 8-0000008__________ __________ 060-020 8-0000009__________ 060-0208-0000011; BJR000849 __________ 060-020 8-0000012__________ 060-0208-0000013; BJR000851 060-0208-0000014; BJR000852 __________ 060-020 8-0000015__________ __________ 060-020 8-0000016__________ __________ 060-020 8-0000017__________ 060-0208-0000018, BJR000856 060-0208-0000019; BJR000857 060-0208-0000020; BJR000858 060-0208-0000021; BJR000859 060-0219-0004769 - 060-0219-0004771 060-0235-0000030 - 060-0235-0000031 060- 0235-0000801 - 060-0235-0000802 __________ 061-000 1-0000011__________ 061- 0001-0000026 - 061-0001-0000090 061-0001-0002368 - 061-0001-0002369 061-0001-0002368 - 061-0001-0002369 Page 10 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 237 of 326 PAGEID #: 40399 Bates Numbered Documents 061-0001-0004122 - 061-0001-0004125 061-0001-0004275 - 061-0001-0004276 __________ 0 6 1 -0 00 1-0004748__________ 061-0001-0004765 - 061-0001-0004768 __________ 061-000 1-0007611__________ 061-0001-0007831 - 061-0001-0007833 061-0001-0007904 - 061-0001-0007905 061-0002-0000510 - 061-0002-0000512 061-0002-0001640 - 061-0002-0001650 061-0082-0000274 - 061-0082-0000278 __________ 061-015 8-0000237__________ 061- 0158-0001975 - 061-0158-0001976 __________ 061-023 6-0001223__________ __________ 062-000 1-0001000__________ __________ 062-000 1-0001001__________ __________ 0 6 2 -0 00 1-0001004__________ 062- 0001-0001015 - 062-0001-0001016 062-0001-0001190 - 062-0001-0001192 062-0001-0001195 - 062-0001-0001196 062-0074-0000363 - 062-0074-0000367 __________ 062-007 4-0000366__________ 062-0074-0000392 - 062-0074-0000402 __________ 062-014 9-0000325__________ 062-0149-0000902 - 062-0149-0000904 062-0149-0001062 - 062-0149-0001063 062-0149-0005154 - 062-0149-0005160 __________ 062-015 0-0000022__________ 062-0169-0005075 - 062-0169-0005083 062-0215-0000403 - 062-0215-0000404 __________ 062-021 5-0000890__________ __________ 062-021 5-0001001__________ __________ 062-021 5-0001340__________ __________ 0 6 2 -0 21 5-0004294__________ 062- 0215-0004403 - 062-0215-0004465 063- 0001-0000969 - 063-0001-0000970 063-0001-0001156 - 063-0001-0001181 063-0001-0001942 - 063-0001-0001943 063-0001-0003740 - 063-0001-0003746 063-0001-0003808 - 063-0001-0003809 __________ 063-000 1-0004306__________ 063-0001-0004500 - 063-0001-0004501 063-0001-0005112 - 063-0001-0005116 063-0001-0005880 - 063-0001-0005892 063-0001-0007062 - 063-0001-0007064 Page 11 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 238 of 326 PAGEID #: 40400 Bates Numbered Documents __________ 063-000 1-0007073__________ 063-0001-0007660 - 063-0001-0007661 063-0001-0007974 - 063-0001-0007975 063-0001-0008075 - 063-0001-0008076 063-0001-0008869 - 063-0001-0008871 063-0001-0008972 - 063-0001-0008986 063-0001-0009102 - 063-0001-0009103 063-0002-0000009 - 063-0002-0000011 __________ 063-000 2-0000659__________ 063-0002-0000682 - 063-0002-0000730 063-0151-0002259 - 063-0151-0002260 063-0151-0005555 - 063-0151-0005556 __________ 0 6 3 -0 15 1-0007708__________ __________ 0 6 3 -0 15 1-0009648__________ 063-0151-0010259 - 063-0151-0010260 063-0151-0015726 - 063-0151-0015727 063-0151-0015743 - 063-0151-0015744 063-0151-0017153 - 063-0151-0017188 __________ 063-015 1-0025370__________ __________ 063-015 1-0025371__________ 063-0151-0025372 - 063-0151-0025375 __________ 063-015 1-0027486__________ __________ 063-015 1-0029861__________ __________ 0 6 3 -0 15 1-0032978__________ __________ 063-015 1-0032979__________ 063-0151-0032980 - 063-0151-0032982 __________ 063-015 1-0034769__________ 063-0151-0034770 - 063-0151-0034791 063-0151-0034770 - 063-0151-0034791 063-0151-0034792 - 063-0151-0034804 063-0151-0034851 - 063-0151-0034866 063-0151-0036930 - 063-0151-0036931 063-0151-0037439 - 063-0151-0037440 __________ 063-015 1-0038411__________ 063-0151-0038659 - 063-0151-0038660 __________ 063-015 1-0038721__________ 063-0151-0038782 - 063-0151-0038783 __________ 0 6 3 -0 15 1-0040674__________ 063-0151-0042163 - 063-0151-0042165 __________ 0 6 3 -0 15 1-0045638__________ __________ 063-015 1-0045640__________ __________ 063-015 1-0046057__________ 063-0151-0046968 - 063-0151-0046970 063-0151-0047507-063-0151-0047509 Page 12 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 239 of 326 PAGEID #: 40401 Bates Numbered Documents __________ 0 6 3 -0 15 1-0048144__________ 063-0151-0048450 - 063-0151-0048451 063-0151-0048514 - 063-0151-0048516 063-0151-0050940 - 63-0151-0050941 063-0169-0001256 - 063-0169-0001279 066- 0002-0002417 - 066-0002-0002420 __________ 066-000 2-0003009__________ 067- 0141-0029363 - 067-0141-0029366 070-0106-0000001 - 070-0106-0000021 _____________ 070-014 0978_____________ 075-0126-0000344 - 075-0126-0000346 075-0144-0000052 - 075-0144-0000054 075-0144-0000067 - 075-0144-0000075 __________ 075-014 4-0000357__________ 075-0144-0000598 - 075-0144-0000599 075-0144-0001848 - 075-0144-0001850 075-0144-0002837 - 075-0144-0002838 075-0144-0003072 - 075-0144-0003073 __________ 0 7 5 -0 14 4-0003074__________ __________ 075-014 4-0004825__________ 075-0144-0005163 - 075-0144-0005164 __________ 0 7 5 -0 14 4-0005214__________ __________ 075-014 4-0006515__________ __________ 075-014 4-0008753__________ 075-0144-0009744-075-0144-0009745 __________ 075-014 4-0010992__________ 075-0144-0010993 - 075-0144-0010994 __________ 075-014 4-0011119__________ __________ 075-014 4-0011120__________ 075-0144-0011163 - 075-0144-0011164 075-0144-0012180 - 075-0144-0012182 075-0144-0013008 - 075-0144-0013140 __________ 075-014 4-0013431__________ 075-0144-0013943 - 075-0144-0013945 __________ 075-023 7-0000665__________ 077-0106-0000812 - 077-0106-0000814 080-0002-0000208 - 080-0002-0000211 083-0002-0000004 - 083-0002-0000005 083-0159-0010731 - 083-0159-0010735 087-0122-0000062 - 087-0122-0000075 087-0164-0000678 - 087-0164-0000679 __________ 087-016 4-0002029__________ 087-0171-0000511 - 087-0171-0000512 092-0163-0007334 - 092-0163-0007335 Page 13 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 240 of 326 PAGEID #: 40402 Bates Numbered Documents 092-0163-0078439 - 092-0163-0078441 ________ 098-0361-0000002.XLS________ __________ 098-036 1-0000010__________ 104-0107-0000482 - 104-0107-0000484 __________ 104-010 7-0000630__________ 109-0162-0000212 - 109-0162-0000214 __________ 109-016 2-0000559__________ 109-0162-0000564 - 109-0162-0000565 109-0162-0000569 - 109-0162-0000571 __________ 109-016 2-0000651__________ 109-0162-0000657 - 109-0162-0000663 109-0162-0000850 - 109-0162-0000853 __________ 109-016 2-0000864__________ __________ 109-016 2-0000870__________ 109-0162-0000871 - 109-0162-0000872 109-0162-0000981 - 109-0162-0000982 109-0162-0001160 - 109-0162-0001161 124-0226-0001644 - 124-0226-0001673 139-0358-0000006 - 139-0358-0000025 177-0401-000001 - 177-0401-000006 196-2023-0000001 - 196-2023-0000006 196-2023-0000007 - 196-2023-0000010 196-2023-0000011 - 196-2023-0000017 196-2023-0000018 - 196-2023-0000024 196-2023-0000025 - 196-2023-0000031 196-2023-0000032 - 196-2023-0000037 196-2023-0000038 - 196-2023-0000042 196-2023-0000043 - 196-2023-0000047 196-2023-0000048 - 196-2023-0000049 196-2023-0000050 - 196-2023-0000055 196-2023-0000056 - 196-2023-0000062 196-2023-0000063 - 196-2023-0000068 196-2023-0000073 - 196-2023-0000079 196-2023-0000080 - 196-2023-0000085 196-2023-0000086 - 196-2023-0000094 196-2023-0000095 - 196-2023-0000101 196-2023-0000102 - 196-2023-0000103 196-2023-0000104 - 196-2023-0000112 196-2023-0000113 - 196-2023-0000122 196-2023-0000123 - 196-2023-0000130 196-2023-0000131 - 196-2023-0000137 196-2023-0000138 - 196-2023-0000152 196-2023-0000153 - 196-2023-0000163 196-2023-0000164 - 196-2023-0000176 Page 14 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 241 of 326 PAGEID #: 40403 Bates Numbered Documents __________ 196-202 4-0000004__________ __________ 196-202 4-0000016__________ 196-2024-0000017 - 196-2024-0000042 196-2024-0000043 - 196-2024-0000045 __________ 196-202 4-0000051__________ __________ 196-202 4-0000052__________ 196-2024-0000128 - 196-2024-0000132 __________ 196-2024-0000133__________ __________ 196-202 4-0000137__________ 196-2024-0000138 - 196-2024-0000158 196-2024-0000159 - 196-2024-0000160 196-2024-0000161 - 196-2024-0000167 196-2024-0000168 - 196-2024-0000172 196-20240000173 - 196-20240000178 196-2024-0000179 - 196-2024-0000182 196-2024-0000183 - 196-2024-0000186 196-2024-0000187 - 196-2024-0000211 196-2024-0000212 - 196-2024-0000308 196-2024-0000309 - 196-2024-0000323 196-2024-0000324 - 196-2024-0000325 196-2024-0000326 - 196-2024-0000327 196-2024-000048 - 196-2024-0000050 196-2025-0000001 - 196-2025-0000004 196-2025-0000005 - 196-2025-0000006 196-2025-0000007 - 196-2025-0000008 196-2025-0000009 - 196-2025-0000011 196-2025-0000012 - 196-2025-0000013 __________ 196-202 5-0000014__________ 196-2025-0000016 - 196-2025-0000017 196-2025-0000018 - 196-2025-0000019 196-2025-0000020 - 196-2025-0000022 196-2025-0000023 - 196-2025-0000024 196-2025-0000025 - 196-2025-0000027 196-2025-0000028 - 196-2025-0000031 196-2026-0000001 - 196-2026-0000004 196-2026-0000005 - 196-2026-0000006 196-2026-0000007 - 196-2026-0000008 __________ 196-202 6-0000009__________ __________ 196-202 6-0000010__________ 196-2026-0000011 - 196-2026-0000012 196-2026-0000013 - 196-2026-0000016 ________ AC009196 - AC009231_________ AC009647 - AC009653 Page 15 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 242 of 326 PAGEID #: 40404 Bates Numbered Documents AC010813 - AC011000; AC011002 - AC01109; EID715739 ________________________ EID715933________________________ _______ AEL000386 - AEL000391; EID16639 - EID16644_______ AEL000399 - AEL000407; EID716652 - EID716660 AJP000076 - AJP000100; EID072532 - EID072556 ___________________ AJP000121; EID72557___________________ AJP000286 - AJP000306; EID072705 - EID072726; EID741057; ________________________ SM K002099________________________ __________________ A JP 000308- AJP000319__________________ ________________________ AJP000320________________________ AJP000873 - AJP000920; EID080295 - EID080296; EID080298 ________________________ EID080337________________________ AJP001059 - AJP001060; EID080480 - EID080481 AJP001063 - AJP001072; EID080484 - EID080493 __________________ A JP001073;EID 080494__________________ AJP001074 - AJP001102; EID080495 - EID080523 __________________ A JP001103;EID 080524__________________ __________________ AJP001137;EID 080537__________________ AJP001138 - AJP001140; EID080538 - EID080539 ________________________ AJP001312________________________ __________________ A JP 001313- AJP001316__________________ __________________ AJP001317 - AJP001318__________________ AJP001317 - AJP001318; EID080717 - EID080718 AJP001319 - AJP001324; EID080719 - EID080724 ________________________ AJP001326________________________ AJP001326 - AJP001330; EID080726 - EID080731 __________________ A JP 001327- AJP001330__________________ AJP001587 - AJP001588; EID080168 - EID080169 __________________ AJP001628; EID924233___________________ AJP002394 - AJP002395; USEPA8842 - USEPA884 __________________ AJP002405- AJP002409__________________ AJP002519 - AJP002522; EID079382 - EID079385 __________________ AJP002523;EID 079386__________________ AJP002971 - AJP002973; EID079634 - EID079636 AJP005297 - AJP005303; EID117492 - EID117498 ASH010156; ASH010159 - ASH010161 - ASH010164; ________________ USEPA14989 - USEPA14994________________ __________________ ASH011324; EID140577__________________ ASH015049 - ASH015072; EID192684 - EID192707 ________________________ ASH016201________________________ __________________ASH017838 - ASH017844__________________ _________________ ASH018117 - ASH018141__________________ _________________ ASH018142 - ASH018143__________________ ASH018146 - ASH018153 Page 16 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 243 of 326 PAGEID #: 40405 Bates Numbered Documents ASH027458 - ASH027511; EID780738 - EID780791 ASH027512 - ASH027563; EID780792 - EID780843 ASH027564 - ASH027617; EID780844 - EID780897 ASH027618 - ASH027658; EID780898 - EID780938 ASH027707 - ASH027790; EID780987 - EID781070 ASH027811 - ASH027844; EID727747 - EID727760 ASH027845 - ASH027869; EID774979 - EID775003 _______________ A VM 000426; EID918750_______________ AVM 009650 - AVM 009654; EID717349 - EID717353 AVM 009657 - AVM 009669; EID717356 - EID717368 AVM 009670 - AVM 003701; EID717369 - EID717400 AVM 009702 - AVM 009728; EID717401 - EID717427 AVM 009729 - AVM 009786; EID717428 - EID717485 A VM 010218 - AVM010244; EID717898 - EID717924 A VM 010248 - AVM 010250; EID717928 - EID717930 AVM 010251 - AVM 010252; EID717931 - EID717932 AVM 010253 - AVM 010255; EID717933 - EID717935 AVM 010295 - AVM 010317; EID717972 - EID717994 A VM 010338 - AVM 010341; EID718015 - EID718018 A VM 010364 - AVM 010366; EID718041 - EID718043 AVM 010370 - AVM 010372; EID718047 - EID718049 AVM 011080 - AVM 011081; EID718742 - EID718743 AVM 011207 - AVM 011208; EID718862 - EID718863 _________________ BEAUCHAMP000031_________________ __________________ B J R 0 0 0 8 2 1 -0 0 0 8 3 2 _________________ BLD003284 - BLD003297; EID521975 - EID521988 BLD003324 - BLD003325; EID522015 - EID522016 BLD003336 - BLD003343; EID522027 - EID522034 BLD003402 - BLD003404; EID522093 - EID522095 ________________CAB000202; EID547051________________ _______________ CF014002; USEPA14704_______________ CF014120 - CF014121; USEPA14706 - USEPA14707 _______________ CF016596; USEPA14710_______________ _________________CF016688 - CF016691_________________ _________________CF016692 - CF016695_________________ CF018453 - CF018502; EID181730 - EID181779 CF018503 - CF018540; EID181780 - EID181817; 000001 _______________________ 000006_______________________ CF018853 - CF018856; EID181068 - EID181071 CF025193 - CF025196; EID229345 - EID229348 _________________CF036446 - CF036464________________ _________________CF036465 - CF036473_________________ _________________CF036481 - CF036517_________________ CF036518 - CF036533 Page 17 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 244 of 326 PAGEID #: 40406 Bates Numbered Documents __________________CF036534 - CF036548_________________ __________________CF036549 - CF036576__________________ __________________CF036577 - CF036588_________________ __________________CF036651 - CF036655__________________ __________________CF036656 - CF036659__________________ _______________________ CF037004_______________________ __________________CF037249 - CF037250__________________ CFO18378; CFO18380 - CFO18452; EID181656 - EID181729 CS000737 - CS000764; EID089043 - EID089070 DDJ001778 - DDJ001780; USEPA8936 - USEPA8938 _____________ DDJ006837 - DDJ006839_____________ _____________ DDJ00684 - DDJ006845_____________ _____________ DDJ006846 - DDJ00848_____________ ___________________ DDJ006904___________________ _____________ DDJ006976 - DDJ006979_____________ _____________ DDJ006976 - DDJ006979_____________ _____________ DDJ008103 - DDJ008108_____________ _____________ DDJ009041; EID604811_____________ _____________ DDJ009397; EID720342_____________ _____________ DDJ009398; EID720343_____________ _____________ DDJ009408 - DDJ009409_____________ __________________D E 0 0 0 2 4 5 -2 6 5 _________________ ______________ D E 000274;E ID 909818______________ DE000352 - DE000354; EID909896 - EID909898 _____________ DEL000001 - DEL000006_____________ ___________________ DFA005370___________________ DFA006722 - DFA006723; EID720457 - EID720458 _______________ D J M 0 0 0 1 4 7 -000155_______________ _______________ D JM 00028Q -000320_______________ ____________ DJM 000321 - DJM 000342____________ DJM000563 - DJM000564; EID502722 - EID502723 ____________ DJM 001027 - DJM 001030____________ ____________ DJM 001031 - DJM 001063____________ _______________ D J M 0 0 1 0 6 4 -001076_______________ ___________________DLZ0037136___________________ _____________ DM R019265; EID721409_____________ _____________ DM R019266; EID721410_____________ DM R019374 - DMR019377; EID721517 - EID721520 DMR019881 - DMR019993; EID722022 - EID722134 DM R019994 - DMR020097; EID722135 - EID722238 DMR020440 - DMR020455; EID722581 - EID722596 _____________ DM R034127; EID794564_____________ DPL000040 - DPL000041; EID713595 - EID713596 Page 18 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 245 of 326 PAGEID #: 40407 Bates Numbered Documents ____________ DPL000042; EID713597____________ ____________ DPL000042; EID713597____________ _____________ DPL000043; EID13598_____________ ____________ DPL000043; EID713598____________ DPL000156 - DPL000165; EID713700 - EID713709 DPL000206 - DPL000210; EID713750 - EID713754 DPL000226- DPL000231; EID713770 - EID713775 __________ DPZ0332640 - DPZ0332650__________ DPZ033265; DPZ0332652 - DPZ0332653 __________ DPZ0332751 - DPZ0332789__________ __________ DPZ0332751 - DPZ0332789__________ __________ DPZ0338890 - DPZ0338896__________ ____________ DRS001805; EID483337____________ _______________ DUP002 - DUP003_______________ ____________________D U P 0 0 4 ____________________ _______________ D U P 0 1 4 - DUP016_______________ _______________ DUP017 - DUP027_______________ _______________ D U P 0 2 8 - DUP062_______________ _______________ DUP063 - DUP187_______________ _______________ D U P 1 8 8 - DUP218_______________ _______________ DUP227 - DUP228_______________ __________ EDD0013496 - EDD0013497__________ __________ EDD0013498 - EDD0013499__________ __________ EDD0017648 - EDD0017651__________ _________________ EDD0018037_________________ __________ EDD0018140 - EDD0030145__________ __________ EDD0019987 - EDD0019988__________ _________________ EDD0020382_________________ __________ EDD0022860 - EDD0022877__________ _________________ EDD0023058_________________ _________________ EDD0023058_________________ __________ EDD0023108 - EDD0023111__________ __________ EDD0025578 - EDD0025603__________ __________ EDD0025633 - EDD0025635__________ _________________ EDD0025666_________________ __________ EDD0025696 - EDD0025717__________ _________________ EDD0025754_________________ _________________ EDD0025792_________________ __________ EDD0025794 - EDD0025795__________ _________________ EDD0025805_________________ __________ EDD0029187 - EDD0029188__________ __________ EDD0029531 - EDD0029533__________ _________________ EDD0029719_________________ EDD0029720 Page 19 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 246 of 326 PAGEID #: 40408 Bates Numbered Documents EDD0029920 - EDD0029926 EDD0029991 - EDD0030019 EDD0030020 - EDD0030021 EDD0030051 - EDD0030053 _______ EDD0030054_______ EDD0030056 - EDD0030098 _______ EDD0030101_______ EDD0030155 - EDD0030154 EDD0030157 - 58 EDD0030189 - EDD0030190 EDD0030261 - EDD0030267 _______ EDD0030262_______ EDD0030268 - EDD0030269 _______ EDD0030282_______ EDD0030291 - EDD0030293 EDD0030296 - EDD0030299 EDD0030311 - EDD0030327 EDD0030328 - EDD0030345 EDD0030328 - EDD0030345 EDD0030328 - EDD0030345 EDD0030397 - EDD0030404 EDD0030720 - EDD0030723 EDD0030832 - EDD0030836 EDD0031995 - EDD0031996 EDD0032428 - EDD0032437 _______ EDD0032530_______ _______ EDD0036870_______ EDD0037501 - EDD0037502 EDD0037974 - EDD37980 _______ EDD0038069_______ _______ EDD0038481_______ EDD0039236 - EDD0039259 _______ EDD0040516_______ EDD0040583 - EDD0040584 EDD0040817 - EDD0040818 _______ EDD0040935_______ EDD0041002 - EDD0041003 _______ EDD0041115_______ _______ EDD0041201_______ _______ EDD0041202_______ _______ EDD0041203_______ EDD0041296 - EDD0041297 EDD0041303 - EDD0041304 EDD0041340 - EDD0041341 Page 20 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 247 of 326 PAGEID #: 40409 Bates Numbered Documents _____________________ EDD0047524_____________________ _____________________ EDD0051095_____________________ ______________EDD0051098 - EDD0051099______________ ______________EDD0052575 - EDD0052576______________ _____________________ EDD0053400_____________________ _____________________ EDD0053811_____________________ _____________________ EDD0053985_____________________ ______________EDD0054275 - EDD0054312______________ _____________________ EDD0058879_____________________ ______________EDD0059977 - EDD0059978______________ ______________EDD0065179 - EDD0065181______________ ______________EDD0065835 - EDD0065837______________ ______________EDD0066002 - EDD0066006______________ ______________EDD0066007 - EDD0066011______________ EDD0066217 - EDD0066219; EDD0066223 - EDD0066252 ______________EDD0069422 - EDD0069424______________ _____________________ EDD0069533_____________________ _____________________ EDD0069702_____________________ ______________EDD0069863 - EDD0069864______________ _____________________ EDD0070085_____________________ _____________________ EDD0070264_____________________ ______________EDD0070290 - EDD0070294______________ _____________________ EDD0070679_____________________ _____________________ EDD0070715_____________________ _____________________ EDD0070715_____________________ _____________ EDD0071408 - EDD0071409_____________ _____________________ EDD0071711_____________________ ______________EDD0071765 - EDD0071767______________ ______________EDD0071832 - EDD0071833______________ ______________EDD0072080 - EDD0072082______________ ______________EDD0072219 - EDD0072220______________ _____________________ EDD0072286_____________________ _____________________ EDD0072289_____________________ ______________EDD0072486 - EDD0072489______________ ______________EDD0072506 - EDD0072508______________ EDD0072617 - EDD0072622; EDD0072648 - EDD0072649 _____________________ EDD0072900_____________________ ______________EDD0072939 - EDD0072951______________ _____________________ EDD0073329_____________________ ______________EDD0073366 - EDD0073368______________ _____________________ EDD0073522_____________________ _____________________ EDD0073854_____________________ _____________________ EDD0073854_____________________ EDD0073970 Page 21 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 248 of 326 PAGEID #: 40410 Bates Numbered Documents _______________________ EDD0073970 _______________________ EDD0074006 _______________________ EDD0075341 ________________ EDD0076050 - EDD0076051 ________________ EDD0076050 - EDD0076051 ________________ EDD0076180 - EDD0076185 ________________ EDD0076245 - EDD0076247 ________________ EDD0076245 - EDD0076247 _______________________ EDD0076288 _______________________ EDD0076605 _______________________ EDD0076764 _______________________ EDD0076791 _______________________ EDD0076831 _______________________ EDD0076839 _______________________ EDD0076852 _______________________ EDD0076876 _______________________ EDD0076877 _______________________ EDD0076880 _______________________ EDD0076880 _______________________ EDD0076881 _______________________ EDD0077002 _______________________ EDD0078793 _______________________ EDD0078793 EDD0078950 - EDD0078954; EDD0078977 - EDD0078987 _______________________ EDD0078997 _______________________ EDD0078997 ________________ EDD0079158 - EDD0079159 _______________________ EDD0079181 ________________ EDD0079199 - EDD0079200 _______________________ EDD0079253 EDD0079362 - EDD0079393; WVDEP14435; WVDEP15850 _______________________ W VDEP15910 _______________________ EDD0085950 ______________________ EDD030020 - 21 _________________ EDD568180 - EDD568189 ________________ EDD568201 - EDD56818203 _______________ EDDD0030157 - EDD0030158 EID009818 - EID009823; RLR001835 - RLR001840 __________________ EID010448; RLR000536 EID017446 - EID017447; RLR001040 - RLR001041 EID017452 - EID017454; RLR001006 - RLR001008 EID017457 - EID017457; RLR000818 - RLR000819 EID018445 - EID018446; LKI000066 - LKI000067; ENV0006163 - ENV0006164 Page 22 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 249 of 326 PAGEID #: 40411 Bates Numbered Documents EID042286 - EID042287; GPD001107 - GPS001108 ________________ EID0525699 - 705________________ EID071353 - EID071357; JM M 002365 - JM M 002369 EID071705 - EID071706; DUP000773 - DUP000774 EID071712 - EID071713; DUP000779 - DUP000780 EID072179 - EID072181; DUP000590 - DUP000592 _____________ EID072183; DUP000783_____________ _____________ EID072185; DUP000785_____________ _____________ EID072186; DUP000786_____________ EID072196 - EID072199; DUP001001 - DUP001004 EID072278 - EID72281; RLR003002 - RLR003005 EID072359 - EID072364; GW 07398 - GW 007403 ___________________ EID072367___________________ EID072378 - EID072380; GW 007426 - GW 0007428 EID072506 - EID072507; AJP000002- AJP000003 EID073151 - EID073151; AJP000764 - AJP000772 _____________ EID073261; G W 007481_____________ EID073338 - EID073342; JM M 008095 - JM M 008099 _____________ EID076926; RLR002898_____________ _____________ EID077622; AJP003241______________ _____________ EID077758; DFA000031_____________ EID077985 - EID078033; RLR002204 - RLR002252 EID078085 - EID078176; AC003179 - AC003271 EID078567 - EID078571; RJZ004937 - RJZ004941 EID078781 - EID078784; RJZ005426 - RJZ005429 EID078812 - EID078814; RJZ006502 - RJZ006504 ___________________ EID079087___________________ ______________EID079088; RJZ009205______________ ______________EID079089; RJZ009206______________ _________________EID079096 - 100________________ EID079096 - EID079100; RJZ009213 - RJZ009218 EID079099 - EID079100; RJZ009217 - RJZ009218 ______________EID079102; RJZ009220______________ EID079107 - EID079108; RJZ009226 - RJZ009228 EID079110 - EID079118; RJZ009253 - RJZ009261 ______________EID079124; RJZ009615______________ EID079134 - EID079140; RJZ009711 - RJZ009716 EID079154 - EID079158; RJZ009758 - RJZ009762 EID079183 - EID079189; RJZ009800 - RJZ009806 EID079256 - EID079257; RJZ009901 - RJZ009902 _______ EID079258 - EID079259; EID079269________ EID079271 - EID079272; AJP002394 - AJP002395 EID079274 - EID079276; AJP002397- AJP002399 EID079353 - EID079354; AJP002491 - AJP002492 Page 23 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 250 of 326 PAGEID #: 40412 Bates Numbered Documents EID079355 - EID079359; AJP002493 - AJP002497 EID079360 - EID079361; AJP002498 - AJP002499 ____________ EID079396 - EID079398; AJP002541____________ EID079399 - EID079418; AJP002552 - AJP002571 __________________ EID079508; AJP002835__________________ EID079509 - EID079514; AJP002836 - AJP002842 __________________ EID079541; AJP002869__________________ EID079552 - EID079553; AJP002880 - AJP002881 EID079554 - EID079563; RJZ009764 - RJZ009764 - RJZ009773 EID079613 - EID079626; AJP002950- AJP002963 EID079641 - EID079642; AJP002267 - AJP002268 EID079682 - EID079684; AJP002312 - AJP002314 EID079710 - EID079711; EID944538 - EID944539; AJP002340 ____________ AJP002341; RJZ024504 - RJZ024505_____________ EID079740 - EID079754; AJP002371 - AJP002385 EID079778 - EID079782; AJP002142 - AJP002146 ________________________ EID080125________________________ EID080172 - EID080173; AJP001651- AJP001652 __________________ EID080193; AJP001378__________________ EID080194 - EID080197; AJP001379 - AJP001382 __________________ EID080198; AJP001383___________________ EID080199 - EID080203; AJP001384 - AJP001388 __________________ EID080208; AJP001393___________________ EID080209 - EID080210; AJP001394 - AJP001395 EID080211 - EID080213; AJP001396 - AJP001398 EID080255 - EID080260; AJP001440 - AJP001445 __________________ EID080599; AJP001199__________________ EID080612 - EID080613; AJP001212 - AJP001213 EID080614 - EID080621; AJP001214 - AJP001221 EID080707 - EID080709; AJP001307 - AJP001309 EID080732 - EID080737; AJP0011331- AJP001336 EID080738 - EID080739\ AJP001337- AJP001338 EID080741 - EID080742; AJP001340 - AJP001341 __________________ EID080797 - EID080801__________________ EID080797 - EID080801; GW 006836 - GW 006840 __________________ EID080803; LK1001393__________________ EID081496 - EID081536; JLO000228 - JLO000268 EID082037 - EID082047; RJZ015393 - RJZ0153403 EID082048 - EID082051; RJZ015405 - RJZ015407 ___________________EID082077; RJZ015499___________________ EID082081 - EID082090; RJZ015511 - RJZ015521 EID082227 - EID082230; JLO000728 - JLO000731 EID083548 - EID084482; JRB002360 - JRB003294 Page 24 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 251 of 326 PAGEID #: 40413 Bates Numbered Documents ______________________ EID086812 - 20______________________ ________EID087487 - EID087508; CF008987 - CF009008________ ________EID087514 - EID087567; CF009014 - CF009067________ ________EID087604 - EID087606; CF009103 - CF009105________ EID089300 - EID089303; DDJ001536 - DDJ001539 ___________________EID089407 - EID089415___________________ _________________________ EID089418_________________________ _________________________ EID089421_________________________ _________________________ EID089516_________________________ EID091316 - EID091317; RJZ026696 - RJZ026697 EID091340 - EID091354; RJZ026743 - RJZ026757 EID091378 - EID091402; RJZ02655 - RJZ02668; RJZ02670 _________________________ RJZ026580_________________________ ___________________ EID091388; RJZ026565___________________ EID092770 - EID092810; RJZ021593 - RJZ021633 EID093140 - EID093147; RJZ020573 - RJZ020588 EID094265; EID094310 - EID094311; ASH004705; ASH004750 ASH004751; ASH005106 - ASH005111; EID094666 - EID094671 EID096449 - EID096450; BWK000014 - BWK000015 EID097576 - EID097700; TSB000469 - TSB000593 EID097916 - EID097929; TSB000990 - TSB001003 EID097930 - EID097971; TSB001004 - TSB001045 EID098426 -EID098476; TSB001501 - TSB001551 EID098766 - EID098769; JW000095 - JW 000098 EID098770 - EID098773; JW000099 - JW000102 EID102770 - EID102771; AVM 000200 - AVM 000201 EID102777 - EID102781; AVM 000213 - AVM 000217 EID102805 - 102817; AVM 000242 - AVM 000254 _____________ EID102984; ASH010015_____________ EID103018 - EID103023; ASH010156 - ASH010164 _____________ EID103022; ASH010163_____________ EID103027 - EID103031; ASH010172 - ASH010177 EID104354 - EID104356; ASH008956 - ASH008958 EID106039 - EID106046; RB000010 - RB000017 EID106699 - EID106708; WEF000654; WEF000658 ___________________W EF000666___________________ EID106699 - EID106708\ W EF000654 - WEF000666 ______________ EID107196; RL001777______________ ______________ EID107358; RL001986______________ _________________ EID107654 -5 7 _________________ EID108608 - EID108615; RP001967 - RP001974 ________________ EID109493 - 525________________ EID109493 - EID109517; GLK002502 - GLK002528 Page 25 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 252 of 326 PAGEID #: 40414 Bates Numbered Documents EID109493 - EID109525; GLK002502 - GLK002541 EID109518 - EID109525; GLK002534 - GLK002541 EID109642 - EID109701; GLK002614 - GLK002673 EID109642 - EID110018; GLK002614 - GLK002981 EID110113 - EID110115; ARF000015 - ARF000017 EID110552 - EID110552; BLD000044 - BLD000051 ____________________ EID110553____________________ EID111009 - EID111010; RJA000232 - RJA000233 EID111565 -EID111602; RJC000945 - RJC000982 EID112798 - EID112830; RJZ029978 - RJZ030010 ______________ EID112971; DDJ001815______________ EID114185 - EID114197; RP002056 - RP002068 EID118383 - EID118386; GIL000007 - GIL000010 EID118757 - EID118781; WAB000514 - WAB000538 EID118782 - EID118804; W AB000169 - W AB000191 EID118805 - EID118825; W AB000192 - W AB000212 EID118986 - EID118988; M EM 000430 - M EM 000432 EID120806 - EID120818; RP002159 - RPP002171 EID120819 - EID120826; RP002172 - RP002179 EID120827 - EID120834; RP002180 - RP002187 EID121024 - EID121043; DPC000070 - DPC000089 EID123138 - EID123141; DUP001005 - DUP001008 EID123142 - EID123143; DUP001009 - DUP001010 EID123531 - EID123532; RLR003481 - RLR003482 EID123558 - EID123595; EW M 000125 - EW M 000162 __________________ EID124568-77__________________ __________________ EID124578-93__________________ __________________ E ID 1 2 4 5 9 4 -6 0 7 __________________ __________________ EID124827-40__________________ __________________ EID124841-51__________________ ____________________ EID126942____________________ __________________ EID126946-52__________________ __________________ EID126953-59__________________ __________________ EID126960-66__________________ __________________ EID126967-75__________________ __________________ EID127665-84__________________ EID136033 - EID136034; JRW000022 - JRW000023 __________________ EID137954-64__________________ __________________ EID137965-86__________________ ________________ E ID 137987-138014________________ __________________ EID 138015-034__________________ __________________ E ID 1 3 8 0 5 5 -1 1 1 __________________ __________________ EID138112-135__________________ EID138136 Page 26 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 253 of 326 PAGEID #: 40415 Bates Numbered Documents ________________ EID 138137-158________________ _________________ EID138159-82_________________ ________________ EID138466-509________________ EID140567 - EID140578; ASH011314 - ASH011325 ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 0 2 -143309______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 2 4 -143331______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 3 2 -143342______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 4 8 -143349______________ EID143358 - EID143361; BSL000250 - BSL000253 ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 8 5 -143386______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 8 7 -143395______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 3 9 6 -143399______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 0 0 -143402______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 0 3 -143406______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 2 0 -143424______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 4 3 -143450______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 5 1 -143455______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 5 6 -143463______________ ___________________E ID 1 4 3 4 6 4 __________________ ___________________E ID 1 4 3 4 6 6 __________________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 6 7 -143468______________ ___________________E ID 1 4 3 4 6 8 __________________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 6 9 -143470______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 7 1 -143472______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 7 3 -143477______________ ___________________E ID 1 4 3 4 7 9 __________________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 8 0 -143486______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 9 4 -143495______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 9 6 -143498______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 4 9 9 -145501______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 2 1 -143534______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 3 5 -143536______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 3 7 -143542______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 4 3 -143550______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 5 1 -143554______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 5 5 -143557______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 5 9 -143562______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 6 7 -143569______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 3 5 7 0 -143579______________ ______________ E ID 14358Q -143596______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 7 1 9 7 -147200______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 0 3 -147205______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 0 7 -147209______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 1 0 -147211 Page 27 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 254 of 326 PAGEID #: 40416 Bates Numbered Documents ______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 2 2 -147224______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 3 6 -147239______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 4 2 -147245______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 7 2 6 6 -147271______________ ____________ EID147311; DDJ001807____________ EID147511 - EID147513; DDJ002286 - DDJ002288 ______________ EID 147555-157597______________ EID147883 - EID147923; FS000010 - FS000050 EID147886 - EID147893; FS000013 - FS000020 EID147894 - EID147923;FS000021- FS000050 EID147927 - EID147931; FS000054 - FS000058 _____________ EID147954; FS000107_____________ EID148048 - EID148049; FS000252 - FS000253 EID148048 - EID148052; FS000252 - FS000256 ______________ E ID 1 4 8 0 6 5 -148069______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 9 3 3 4 -149551______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 9 5 5 2 -149604______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 9 6 0 5 -149625______________ ______________ E ID 1 4 9 6 2 6 -149739______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 0 9 3 -150173______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 1 7 4 -150234______________ __________________ EID150269__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 2 7 3 -150275______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 2 7 6 -150279______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 2 8 0 -150285______________ __________________ EID150286__________________ __________________ EID150287__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 2 9 6 -150300______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 3 0 1 -150343______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 3 4 4 -150404______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 0 5 -150406______________ __________________ EID150407__________________ __________________ EID150408__________________ __________________ EID150409__________________ ______________ E ID 15041Q -150412______________ __________________ EID150413__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 1 4 -150415______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 1 6 -150417______________ __________________ EID150418__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 1 9 -150420______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 2 1 -150423______________ __________________ EID150424__________________ __________________ EID150425__________________ E ID 1 5 0 4 2 6 -150427 Page 28 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 255 of 326 PAGEID #: 40417 Bates Numbered Documents ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 2 8 -150431______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 3 2 -150436______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 3 8 -150455______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 5 6 -150475______________ __________________ EID150476__________________ __________________ EID150477__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 4 7 8 -150494______________ ___________________E ID 1 5 0 4 9 5 __________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 0 6 5 8 -150674______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 1 1 0 1 -151103______________ _______________EID 151155-151167______________ EID151682 - EID151802; RGS000885 - RGS001003 __________________ EID151900__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 1 9 0 1 -151906______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 1 9 1 1 -151927______________ EID151933 - EID151936; RLR003573 - RLR003576 ______________ E ID 1 5 1 9 6 6 -152069______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 3 1 3 -152346______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 3 4 7 -152353______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 3 5 4 -152367______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 3 6 8 -152372______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 3 7 3 -152374______________ ___________________E ID 1 5 2 3 7 5 __________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 3 7 6 -152508______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 0 9 -152511______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 1 2 -152529______________ __________________ EID152531__________________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 3 2 -152542______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 4 3 -152545______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 4 6 -152559______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 6 0 -152567______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 6 8 -152575______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 7 6 -152580______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 8 1 -152582______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 8 3 -152593______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 5 9 4 -152600______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 2 6 0 1 -152622______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 3 0 2 1 -153036______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 3 0 3 7 -153053______________ ______________ E ID 15307Q -153081______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 3 0 8 2 -153083______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 3 0 8 4 -153106______________ ______________ E ID 1 5 3 1 0 7 -153125______________ EID153131 Page 29 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 256 of 326 PAGEID #: 40418 Bates Numbered Documents EID153132 E ID 1 5 3 1 3 3 -153137 E ID 1 5 3 1 3 8 -153144 E ID 1 5 3 2 0 9 -153225 E ID 1 5 3 4 0 5 -153413 E ID 1 5 3 4 9 0 -153497 EID15404 EID156076 - EID156080 EID156108 - EID156116 EID156165 - EID156166 EID156362 EID156378-EID156379 EID156380-EID156382 EID156383-EID156386 EID156387-EID156388 EID156389-EID156390 EID156391-EID156394 EID156397 EID156398-EID156399 EID156417-EID156418 EID156419 EID156420 EID156846-EID156849 EID156859 EID156863 EID157302-EID157305 EID157578 - EID157583 E ID 1 5 7 6 3 1 -E ID 1 5 7 6 5 5 EID157785 - EID157790 EID157940 EID157940 EID157950 EID157950 EID158015 EID158024 - EID158028 EID158029 - EID158030 EID158031 - EID158034 EID158041 - EID158042 EID158046 EID158076 - EID158078 EID158280-EID158281 EID158623 - EID158627 EID158830 - EID158834 EID159341-EID159343 Page 30 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 257 of 326 PAGEID #: 40419 Bates Numbered Documents ____________________E ID 1 5 9 3 4 4 ____________________ _____________ EID159350 - EID159359______________ ______________ EID159546-EID159547______________ ______________ EID159550-EID159551______________ ______________ EID159552-EID159553______________ ______________ EID159640-EID159642______________ ______________ EID159650-EID159653______________ ______________ EID159670-EID159675______________ _____________ EID160006 - EID160007______________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 0 0 4 8 ___________________ ______________ E ID 160301-E ID 160304______________ ____________________E ID 1 6 1 6 9 2 ____________________ _____________ EID161725 - EID161727______________ ____________________E ID 1 6 1 7 7 5 ____________________ ______________ EID163391-EID163407______________ ______________ EID 163408-EID 163418______________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 3 4 4 6 ____________________ ______________ EID163447-EID163451______________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 3 4 7 3 ____________________ _____________ EID163488 - EID163489______________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 3 9 0 2 ____________________ _____________ EID164389 - EID164390______________ ______________ EID164501-EID164503______________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 4 5 0 5 ____________________ ______________ EID164735-EID164736______________ ______________ EID164776-EID164791______________ _____________ EID165462; HDR002697_____________ _______________ E ID 1 6 5 4 6 3 -165466________________ _______________ E ID 1 6 5 7 1 2 -165714_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 5 8 3 9 -165843_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 5 8 4 4 -165850_______________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 5 8 7 7 ____________________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 5 8 7 8 ___________________ ____________________ E ID 1 6 5 8 8 1 ____________________ EID166245 - EID166247; DGW 000038 - DGW000040 _______________ E ID 1 6 6 4 4 6 -166448_______________ EID166599 - EID166599; GK004797 - GK004806 EID166599 - EID166608; GK004797 - GK004806 EID166599 - EID166608; GK004797 - GK004806 EID166599 - EID166608; GK004797 - GK004806 EID166794 - EID166795; GW 008674 - GW 008675 EID166796 - EID166802; GW 008676 - GW 008682 EID166809 - EID166819; GW 008689 - GW 008699 EID166921 - EID166925; HDR002256 - HDR002260 Page 31 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 258 of 326 PAGEID #: 40420 Bates Numbered Documents EID167090 - EID167097; HDR002485 - HDR002492 _____________ EID167133; HDR002530_____________ _____________ EID167134; HDR002531_____________ EID167162 - EID167166; HDR002561 - HDR002565 _______ EID167416; RLR002983; HDR002860_______ _________________ EID167436 - 37_________________ _______ EID167437; RLR003302; HDR002881_______ EID167494 - EID167495; HDR002938 - HDR002939 _____________ EID167558; HDR003004_____________ EID167716 - EID167717; JHW000004 - JHW000005 EID168057 - EID168080; MAH000429 - MAH000452 EID168081 - EID168085; MAH000453 - MAH000457 EID168086 - EID168165; M AH000458 - MAH000537 EID168166 - EID168192; M AH00538 - M AH000564 EID168193 - EID168227; MAH000565 - MAH000599 _______________ E ID 1 6 8 2 2 8 -168260_______________ ___________________ EID168262___________________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 2 9 2 -168296_______________ ___________________ EID168414___________________ EID168431 -168454; WAB000728 - WAB000741 _______________ E ID 1 6 8 4 5 5 -168472_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 4 7 3 -168491_______________ _____________ EID168492 - EID168514_____________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 5 4 5 -168574_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 6 0 2 -168650_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 7 1 7 -168719_______________ ___________________ EID168720___________________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 7 2 5 -168729_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 8 7 3 0 -168744_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 9 2 3 7 -169288_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 9 2 8 4 -169285_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 9 3 7 2 -169479_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 9 6 5 8 -169678_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 9 8 2 1 -169818_______________ _______________ E ID 1 6 9 8 9 2 -169895_______________ ___________________ EID170533___________________ EID170703 - EID170712; KHF000032 - KHF000042 ___________________ EID170763___________________ _____________ EID170795 - EID170798_____________ EID170810 - EID170811; KHF000151 - KHF000152 _______________ E ID 1 7 1 0 8 1 -171092_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 1 1 9 7 -171213_______________ ___________________ EID171215___________________ EID171216 Page 32 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 259 of 326 PAGEID #: 40421 Bates Numbered Documents ___________________ EID171217___________________ _______________ E ID 1 7 1 2 1 8 -171221_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 1 2 2 2 -171223_______________ ___________________ EID171224___________________ ___________________ EID171225___________________ ___________________ EID171226___________________ _______________ E ID 1 7 1 2 2 8 -171269_______________ _______________ E ID 17127Q -171275_______________ _______________ E ID 17137Q -171377_______________ EID173810 - EID173819; RP005853 - RP005862 EID173820 - EID173825; RP005863 - RP005868 EID173826 - EID173831; RP005869; RP005874 EID173908 - EID173918; RP006001 - RP006011 _______________ E ID 1 7 3 9 4 3 -173944_______________ ______________ EID173974; RP006068______________ EID173975 - EID173979; RP006069 - RP006073 EID174008 - EID174024; RP006103 - RP006120 EID174040 - EID174048; RP006144 - RP006152 _______________ E ID 1 7 4 5 1 2 -174513_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 6 9 8 8 -176992_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 6 9 9 7 -177012_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 0 6 4 -177071_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 0 9 4 -177104_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 1 0 5 -177115_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 1 1 6 -177120_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 1 2 6 -177130_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 1 6 7 -177175_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 1 8 5 -177191_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 1 9 2 -177200_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 2 0 1 -177202_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 2 0 3 -177208_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 2 0 9 -177212_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 2 1 3 -177215_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 4 4 3 -177453_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 4 5 4 -177455_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 7 5 6 6 -177583_______________ EID178053 - EID178055; AVM 010376 - AVM 010378 _______________ E ID 1 7 8 2 5 0 -177639_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 8 2 7 0 -178272_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 8 2 9 3 -178314_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 8 3 4 9 -178357_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 8 3 5 8 -178378_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 8 3 9 9 -178402_______________ E ID 1 7 8 4 1 9 -178420 Page 33 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 260 of 326 PAGEID #: 40422 Bates Numbered Documents E ID 1 7 8 4 2 4 -178427 E ID 1 7 8 4 5 1 -178453 EID178454 EID178455 E ID 1 7 8 4 5 6 -178457 E ID 1 7 8 4 5 8 -178459 EID178460 EID178461 E ID 1 7 8 4 6 2 -178463 EID178464 E ID 1 7 8 4 6 5 -178466 E ID 1 7 8 4 6 7 -178468 EID178485 E ID 1 7 8 5 1 5 -178526 E ID 1 7 8 5 6 9 -178589 E ID 1 7 8 6 1 2 -178618 E ID 1 7 8 6 4 6 -178659 E ID 1 7 8 6 6 0 -178759 E ID 1 7 9 0 2 2 -179029 EID179031 E ID 1 7 9 1 5 6 -179163 EID179165 EID179183 E ID 1 7 9 1 8 4 -179189 E ID 1 7 9 1 9 0 -179195 EID179196 E ID 1 7 9 1 9 7 -179203 E ID 1 7 9 2 0 4 -179207 E ID 1 7 9 2 0 8 -179209 EID179210 EID179211 EID179212 EID179213 E ID 1 7 9 2 1 4 -179218 E ID 1 7 9 2 4 2 -179248 E ID 1 7 9 2 4 9 -179250 E ID 1 7 9 2 5 1 -179252 E ID 1 7 9 2 5 3 -179254 E ID 1 7 9 2 5 5 -179256 E ID 1 7 9 2 5 7 -179260 E ID 1 7 9 2 6 1 -179265 E ID 1 7 9 2 6 6 -179279 E ID 1 7 9 2 8 9 -179306 E ID 1 7 9 3 7 6 -179378 Page 34 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 261 of 326 PAGEID #: 40423 Bates Numbered Documents _______________ E ID 1 7 9 7 2 2 -179726_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 7 4 3 -179744_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 7 4 6 -179758_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 7 5 9 -179761_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 7 6 7 -179773_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 7 9 7 -179815_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 8 2 9 -179837_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 8 8 0 -179885_______________ _______________ E ID 1 7 9 9 6 1 -180062_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 0 6 8 -180159_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 1 6 0 -180173_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 5 8 9 -180596_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 5 9 7 -180598_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 5 9 9 -180606_______________ _______________ E ID 18067Q -180676_______________ ___________________ EID180677___________________ ___________________ EID180720___________________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 7 2 1 -180723_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 7 4 3 -180797_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 7 9 8 -180802_______________ ___________________ EID180826___________________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 8 2 8 -180833_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 0 9 3 3 -181042_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 1 0 4 3 -181047_______________ _________________ EID181068 - 71_________________ EID181074 - EID181076; CF018865 - CFO18867 _______________ E ID 1 8 1 1 5 4 -181155_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 1 1 5 7 -181158_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 1 4 1 1 -181414_______________ EID181818 - EID181884; CF018541 - CF018607 EID181885 - EID181987; CF018608 - CF018710 EID181993 - EID182060; CF018716 - CF018783 ______________ EID182129; CF018868______________ EID182132 - EID182156; CF018872 - CF018896 EID182158 - EID182171; CF010098 - CF018911 _______________ E ID 1 8 2 2 6 9 -182281_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 2 2 9 2 -182335_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 2 9 5 0 -182953_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 3 4 3 0 -183432_______________ EID184174 - EID184176; DMR000836 - DMR000838 _______________ E ID 1 8 5 0 1 2 -185018_______________ EID185019 - EID185152; RJZ032545 - RJZ032681; ___________ W VDEP11781; EDD0078793___________ EID185155 - EID185160; RJZ032691 - RJZ032696 Page 35 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 262 of 326 PAGEID #: 40424 Bates Numbered Documents EID185166 - EID185171; RJZ032702 - RJZ032707 EID185172 - EID185181; RJZ032708 - RJZ032717 _______________ E ID 1 8 5 1 9 4 -185198_______________ EID185203 - EID185204; RJZ032739 - RJZ032740 EID185206 - EID185207; RJZ032742 - RJZ032743 ___________________ EID185367___________________ EID185375 - EID185376; RJZ033726 - RJZ033727 _______________ E ID 1 8 5 3 8 2 -185391_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 4 3 4 -185438_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 4 8 7 -185490_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 4 9 8 -185499_______________ _______________ E ID 18550Q -185507_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 5 2 0 -185521_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 5 2 2 -185526_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 5 6 5 -185571_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 5 9 4 -185603_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 6 0 4 -185612_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 6 1 3 -185623_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 6 2 4 -185627_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 6 2 8 -185634_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 8 8 5 -185892_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 8 9 3 -185899_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 9 0 0 -185905_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 9 0 6 -185908_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 9 0 9 -185911_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 9 1 5 -185921_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 9 2 2 -185927_______________ _______________ E ID 1 8 5 9 2 8 -185932_______________ EID186599 - EID166608; GK004797 - GK004808 EID189826 - EID189835; RJA000688 - RJA000698 EID189826 - EID189835; RJA000688 - RJA000698 _____________ EID190467; RJC003907______________ _____________ EID191301 - EID191304_____________ EID191815 - EID191817; W AB001220 - W AB001222 _____________ EID192135; AJP007298_____________ _____________ EID192137; AJP007300_____________ EID192481 - EID192482; ASH014611 - ASH014612 EID192536 - EID192564; ASH014666 - ASH014694 EID192579 - EID192580; ASH014727 - ASH014728 EID192581 - EIS192586; ASH014729 - ASH014734 _______________ E ID 1 9 2 5 8 1 -192586_______________ EID192595 - EID192599; ASH014743 - ASH014747 EID193045 - EID193057; ASH015454 - ASH015471 EID193608 - EID193610; C F020518- CF020520 Page 36 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 263 of 326 PAGEID #: 40425 Bates Numbered Documents ________EID193611 - EID193612; CF020522 - CF020523_______ ___________________ EID193613; CF020524___________________ ________EID193614 - EID193618; CF020541 - CF020545_______ EID194854 - EID194858; DDJ002454 - DDJ002458 ___________________EID194959; DDJ002585___________________ ___________________EID194960; DDJ002586___________________ _________________________ E ID 1 9 5 2 0 8 ________________________ EID195325 - EID195326; GAA000139 - GAA000140 EID195965 - EID195968; PJB000040 - PJB000043 EID196182 - EID196183; PJB000298 - PJB000299 EID196260 - EID196263; PJB000378 - PJB000381 ______________________ EID198111 - 26______________________ ________EID198111 - EID198126; T F 0 0 1 3 7 1 - TF001386________ EID198240 - EID198253; EID198335; WAB001570 _________________ W AB001583; W A B001712_________________ EID206901 - EID206903; SDB012902 - SDB012904 EID207207 - EID207212; SDB013208 - SDB013213 __________________ EID207504; SDB013505__________________ ___________________EID209493; BLD000045___________________ ___________________EID209494; BLD000046__________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 1 3 7 7 -211398____________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 2 3 4 3 -212363____________________ EID212363; GAC000533; GAC000513 - GAC000532; EID212343 ______________________ - EIDEID212362______________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 2 8 5 9 -212872____________________ ______________________ EID213164 - 169______________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 3 3 8 9 -213390____________________ __________________ EID213390 - EID213390__________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 3 4 6 7 -213472____________________ __________________ EID213799 - EID213810__________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 3 7 9 9 -213810____________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 4 9 4 5 -214955____________________ __________________ EID214971 - EID214972__________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 4 9 7 5 -214979____________________ ___________________ EID215079; BJR000284___________________ ____________________ EID 21514Q -215157____________________ __________________ EID215560; C M B 000340__________________ EID217103 - EID217104; LWB000757 - LWB000758 __________________ EID217105; LWB000759__________________ ____________________ E ID 2 1 9 6 3 7 -219641____________________ ____________________ E ID 2 2 0 3 2 7 -220328____________________ ____________________ E ID 2 2 0 4 5 9 -220469____________________ __________________ EID221531 - EID221532__________________ EID221589 - EID221591 Page 37 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 264 of 326 PAGEID #: 40426 Bates Numbered Documents _____________ EID221744 - EID221750_____________ _____________ EID221879 - EID221883_____________ _____________ EID221950 - EID221954_____________ ___________________ EID221967____________________ ___________________ EID222894____________________ ___________________ EID222899____________________ _____________ EID223429 - EID223430_____________ ___________________ EID223479____________________ _____________ EID223496 - EID223497_____________ _____________ EID223560 - EID223569_____________ ____________________E ID 2 2 6 1 7 8 ___________________ ______________ EID229034; CF024274______________ EID229243 - EID229244; C F025091- CF025092 EID229275 - EID229291; CF025123 - CF025139 EID229345 - EID229348; CF025193 - CF025196 _______________ E ID 2 3 0 6 8 7 -230692_______________ EID252586 - EID252587; MAK001332 - MAK001333 _______________ E ID 2 5 2 5 8 6 -252587_______________ EID252781 - EID252782; MAK002238 - MAK002239 _______________ E ID 2 5 2 7 8 1 -252782_______________ EID252785 - EID252786; MAK002242 - MAK002243 _____________ EID252791 - EID252799_____________ EID252815 - EID252816; M AK002280_______ EID252953 - EID252962; MAK002612 - MAK002621 EID252953 - EID252962; MAK002612 - MAK002621 _______________ E ID 2 5 2 9 5 3 -252962_______________ EID253072 - EID253091; MAK002739 - MAK002760 EID253072 - EID253091; MAK002739 - MAK002760 EID253072 - EID253091; MAK002739; MAK002741 - MAK002742; MAK002744 - MAK002760 _______________ E ID 2 5 3 0 7 2 -253091_______________ EID253097 - EID253100; MAK002768 - MAK002771 _______________ E ID 2 5 3 0 9 7 -253100_______________ _____________ EID253102; M AK002774_____________ _____________ EID253102; M AK002774_____________ _____________ EID253102; M AK002774_____________ ____________________E ID 2 5 4 3 1 7 ___________________ ____________________E ID 2 5 4 7 6 0 ___________________ EID254893 - EID254894; MAK003185 - MAK003186 _____________ EID255223; M AK004129_____________ _____________ EID255224; M AK004130_____________ ____________________E ID 2 5 5 2 2 6 ___________________ ____________________E ID 2 5 5 2 3 3 ____________________ EID255244 Page 38 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 265 of 326 PAGEID #: 40427 Bates Numbered Documents EID256133 - EID256137; RJZ007652 - RJZ007656 EID256133 - EID256162; RJZ007652 - RJZ007681 ______________________ EID256133 -3 7 ______________________ ______________________ EID256133-162______________________ __________________ EID257590 - EID257591__________________ ____________________ E ID 2 5 9 2 8 2 -259283____________________ __________________ EID262048 - EID262052__________________ __________________ EID262191 - EID262192__________________ __________________ EID262198 - EID262199__________________ __________________ EID262341; EID262343__________________ __________________ EID262471 - EID262472__________________ ________________________ EID262475________________________ __________________ EID262484 - EID262485__________________ __________________ EID266710 - EID266719__________________ __________________ EID267384 - EID267407__________________ ________________________ EID271549________________________ __________________ EID271679 - EID271680__________________ __________________ EID271743 - EID271749__________________ ________________________ EID272252________________________ __________________ EID272585 - EID272586__________________ __________________ EID273441 - EID273442__________________ __________________ EID273505 - EID273507__________________ EID277489 - EID277491; EID166599 - EID166608; GK004797 GK004806; OEPA2548 - OEPA2553; WVDEP14300 WVDEP14311; EID078779 - EID078780; RJZ005408 ____________ RJZ005409; EID079682 - EID079684____________ __________________ EID277891 - EID277892__________________ __________________ EID278951 - EID278953__________________ __________________ EID286132 - EID286134__________________ __________________ EID288787 - EID288820__________________ ________________________ EID290336________________________ __________________ EID290349 - EID290350__________________ __________________ EID292684 - EID292691__________________ __________________ EID292937 - EID292939__________________ __________________ EID292994 - EID292995__________________ __________________ EID292994 - EID292995__________________ ________________________ EID294241________________________ __________________ EID302092 - EID302093__________________ __________________ EID303234 - EID303243__________________ ________________________ EID303759________________________ __________________ EID304417 - EID304434__________________ ________________________ EID310516________________________ __________________ EID310517 - EID310519__________________ EID310520 Page 39 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 266 of 326 PAGEID #: 40428 Bates Numbered Documents _________________ EID310521 - EID310522_________________ _______________________ EID310523_______________________ _______________________ EID310525_______________________ _______________________ EID314202_______________________ _________________ EID314205 - EID314207_________________ _________________ EID314205 - EID314207_________________ _________________ EID316411 - EID316445_________________ _______________________ EID318753_______________________ _______________________ EID318753_______________________ _________________ EID324243 - EID324245_________________ _________________ EID324333 - EID324235_________________ _________________ EID392962 - EID392964_________________ _________________ EID395145 - EID395147_________________ _______________________ EID395370_______________________ _______________________ EID398372_______________________ _________________ EID416481 - EID416484_________________ _________________ EID417693 - EID417694_________________ _______________________ EID418715_______________________ _________________ EID421854 - EID421859_________________ _________________ EID434833 - EID434834_________________ _______________________ EID434841_______________________ _________________ EID434926 - EID434927_________________ _________________ EID435272 - EID435273_________________ _________________ EID435272 - EID435273_________________ _________________ EID435508 - EID435510_________________ _______________________ EID435869_______________________ _______________________ EID436286_______________________ _________________ EID437504 - EID437507_________________ _________________ EID447531 - EID447532_________________ _________________ EID451631 - EID451641_________________ EID463618 - EID463621; FH000187 - FH000192 _______________________ EID463724_______________________ EID476862 - EID476877; RP025834 - RP025849 EID476878 - EID476884; RP025850 - RP025856 _____________________ EID477089 -9 2 _____________________ EID477258 - EID477261; RWR001044 - RWR001047 EID495124 - EID495129; RP025971 - RP025976 EID495285 - EID495286; RP026263 - RPO26264; GK001381 EID495292 - EID495293; RP026270 - RP026271 EID499576 - EID499586; BJR000822 - BJR000832 EID501021 - EID501034; DDJ006880 - DDJ006893 EID502722 - EID502723; DJM000563 - DJM000564 _______________________ EID509405_______________________ EID509412 - EID509414 Page 40 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 267 of 326 PAGEID #: 40429 Bates Numbered Documents _____________ EID510188 - EID510190_____________ _____________ EID510264; DDJ001732_____________ _____________ EID510411 - EID510413_____________ _____________ EID511064 - EID511095_____________ _____________ EID513141 - EID513154_____________ EID515127 - EID515128; TW F023014 - TW F023015 _____________EID515127; TW F023013_____________ _____________ EID515128 - EID515129_____________ _____________EID515130; TW F023016____________ _____________ EID515430 - EID515439_____________ ___________________ EID515440___________________ _____________ EID515441 - EID515451_____________ _____________ EID515639 - EID515641_____________ ___________________ EID515813___________________ _____________ EID516381 - EID516382_____________ ___________________ EID517138___________________ _____________ EID517491 - EID517492_____________ ___________________ EID517538___________________ _____________ EID517551 - EID517565_____________ ___________________ EID517606___________________ _____________ EID518093 - EID518096_____________ _____________ EID518379 - EID518400_____________ _____________ EID518495 - EID518502_____________ _____________ EID518532 - EID518534_____________ _____________ EID518532 - EID518534_____________ _____________ EID518535 - EID518540_____________ ___________________ EID518911___________________ _____________ EID518933 - EID518937_____________ _____________ EID519196 - EID519197_____________ _____________ EID521257 - EID521271_____________ EID522020 - EID522022; BLD003329 - BLD003331 _____________ EID522042; BLD003351_____________ ___________________ EID524246___________________ _____________ EID524249 - EID524250_____________ _____________ EID525499 - EID525500_____________ _________________EID525504 - 08________________ _____________ EID525504 - EID525507_____________ _____________ EID525526 - EID525531_____________ _____________ EID525536 - EID525538_____________ _____________ EID525542 - EID525543_____________ _____________ EID525569 - EID525583_____________ _____________ EID525610 - EID525670_____________ ___________________ EID525680___________________ EID525699 Page 41 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 268 of 326 PAGEID #: 40430 Bates Numbered Documents EID525700 - EID525705 EID525770 - EID525801 EID525833 - EID525858 EID525866 - EID525870 EID525873 - EID525898 EID525935 - EID525971 EID525992 - EID526062 EID526749 - 50 EID52992 - 526062 EID53072 - 91 EID531319 - EID531320 EID532321 EID534914 EID540637 - EID540659 EID540744 - EID540766 EID540797 - EID540820 EID541168 EID541273 EID541276 - EID541279 EID541405 - EID541408 EID544953 - EID544956 EID545198 - EID545217 EID545530 EID545534 EID545540 - EID545543 EID545545 - EID545548 EID545549 - EID545550 EID545556 EID545557 EID545709 EID546037 - EID546063 EID546083 EID546803 EID546921 - EID546923 EID546942 EID546959; CAB000110 EID546959; EID546967 EID546968 - EID546973 EID546982 EID547005 EID547018 - EID547019 EID550982 - EID 550992 EID550982 - EID550992 EID550982 - EID550992 Page 42 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 269 of 326 PAGEID #: 40431 Bates Numbered Documents _________________ EID550982 - EID550992_________________ _________________ EID550982 - EID550992_________________ _________________ EID550982 - EID550992_________________ _________________ EID550993 - EID550994_________________ _________________ EID550993 - EID550994_________________ _________________ EID550993 - EID550994_________________ _________________ EID550993 - EID550994_________________ _________________ EID550993 - EID550994_________________ _______________________ EID556286_______________________ _________________ EID556287 - EID556289_________________ _________________ EID556290 - EID556294_________________ _______________________ EID556295_______________________ _________________ EID556297 - EID556298_________________ _______________________ EID556301_______________________ _______________________ EID556308_______________________ _______________________ EID556309_______________________ _______________________ EID556310_______________________ _______________________ EID560602_______________________ _______________________ EID563582_______________________ _________________ EID564015 - EID564052_________________ _______________________ EID566582_______________________ _________________ EID566603 - EID566606_________________ _________________ EID567066 - EID567071_________________ _________________ EID568190 - EID568196_________________ _________________ EID568222 - EID568224_________________ _________________ EID568262 - EID568285_________________ _________________ EID568286 - EID568310_________________ _________________ EID568358 - EID568381_________________ _________________ EID568382 - EID568407_________________ _________________ EID568417 - EID568419_________________ _________________ EID568435 - EID568487_________________ _________________ EID568620 - EID568633_________________ _________________ EID568634 - EID568646_________________ _______________________ EID568932_______________________ _________________ EID569170 - EID569176_________________ _______________________ EID569259_______________________ _________________ EID569460 - EID569464_________________ _________________ EID570325 - EID570328_________________ EID570413 - EID570416; IAL000155; IAL000115; IAL000046 EID570974 - EID570987 EID572607 EID572627 - EID572628 EID573516 - EID573530 Page 43 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 270 of 326 PAGEID #: 40432 Bates Numbered Documents ____________E ID 5 7 3 5 7 2 ____________ EID573572 - EID573575 EID573573 - EID573575 EID573606 - EID573614 EID574231; EID574233 EID574563 - EID574566 EID575362 - EID575381 EID575418 - EID575419 EID575420 - EID575421 EID579767 - EID579785 EID582607 - EID582608 EID582684 - EID582685 ____________E ID 5 8 3 1 9 0 ____________ EID583202 - EID583211 EID583563 - EID583569 EID583629 - EID583630 EID583922 - EID583922 EID584105 - EID584116 EID584155 - EID584157 EID585214 - EID585217 EID586986 - EID586988 EID586989 - EID586990 EID586991 - EID586992 EID586993 - EID586994 EID586993 - EID586994 EID591884 - EID591885 EID591886 - EID591887 EID591938 - EID591969 EID595548 - EID595551 ____________E ID 5 9 5 6 0 2 ____________ EID595603 - EID595605 EID596057 - EID596074 EID596106 - EID596126 EID596127 - EID596151 ____________E ID 5 9 6 5 2 0 ____________ EID597061 - EID597062 EID597980 - EID597981 EID597982; CF032597; DOH000066 EID598245 - EID598247 EID598321 - EID598343 EID598372 - EID598374 EID598500 - EID598524 EID599660 - EID599662 EID599668 - EID599670 Page 44 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 271 of 326 PAGEID #: 40433 Bates Numbered Documents ______________EID599673 - EID599674______________ ____________________ EID600954____________________ ____________________ EID600955____________________ ____________________ EID601077____________________ ______________EID601234 - EID601236______________ ____________________ EID601490____________________ ____________________ EID602186____________________ ____________________ EID602186____________________ ____________________ EID602210____________________ ______________EID602476 - EID602478______________ ______________EID602479 - EID602480______________ ______________EID602481 - EID602491______________ ______________EID602492 - EID602494______________ ______________ EID602956; RJZ009431______________ ______________ EID602989; RJZ009515______________ EID602990 - EID602992; RJZ009957 - RJZ009959 EID602999 - EID603010; RJZ009986 - RJZ009997 _________________ EID603099 - 114_________________ EID603748 - EID603757; AJP010233 - AJP010242 EID603819 - EID603827; AJP010304 - AJP010312 _____________ EID604221; DAW 002963_____________ EID604383 - EID604386; DDJ008613 - DDJ008616 EID605154 - EID605155; GHS005475 - GHS005476 EID607756 -EID607758; GK010397 - GK010399 EID609056 - EID609079; HLG002299 - HLG002322 EID609243 - EID609269; HLG002486 - HLG002512 EID609243 - EID609269; HLG002486 - HLG002512 EID610147 - EID610149; JHW003316 - JHW003318 EID610530 - EID610536; MAK008052 - MAK00858 EID610558 - EID610563; MAK008084 - MAK008089 _____________ EID610603; M AK008129_____________ EID610663 - EID610677; MAK008227 - MAK008241 EID610773 - EID610791; MAK008339 - MAK008357 EID610773 - EID610791; MAK008339 - MAK008357 _____________ EID610773; M AK008339_____________ EID611122 - EID611145; MAK008689 - MAK008712 EID611122 - EID611145; MAK008689 - MAK008712 EID611237 - EID611253; MAK008804 - MAK008820 _____________ EID611344; M AK008911_____________ EID611349 - EID611402; MAK008916 - MAK008969 EID611349 - EID611402; MAK008916 - MAK008969 EID611459 - EID6114560; MAK009026 - MAK009027 EID611508 - EID611518; MAK009075 - MAK009085 EID611577- EID611578; MAK009144 - MAK009145 Page 45 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 272 of 326 PAGEID #: 40434 Bates Numbered Documents EID611654 - EID611707; MAK009274 __________________ EID612959-94__________________ EID614231 - EID614240; RB001243 - RB001252 EID614243 - EID614245; RB001260 - RB001262 ______________ EID614605; RL003144______________ EID615033 - EID615035; RLR015399 - RLR015401 _____________ EID616187; STB007131_____________ EID628383 - EID628393; GWJ015349 - GWJ015359 _____________ EID628394; GW J015360_____________ EID630974-EID630987; CF037957 -CF037970 _________________ EID636263 - 69_________________ EID639458 - EID639471; WAB001958 - W AB001971 EID652117 - EID652120; RJZ000174 - RJZ000177 _____________ EID656020 - EID656025_____________ _____________ EID656609 - EID656626_____________ _____________ EID656609 - EID656626_____________ _____________ EID656609 - EID656626_____________ ____________EID656920 - EIDEID656922____________ ___________________ EID657150___________________ _____________ EID657164 - EID657170_____________ _____________ EID657660 - EID657667_____________ _____________ EID658147 - EID658148_____________ ___________________ EID667449___________________ _____________ EID667472 - EID667474_____________ _____________ EID667480 - EID667483_____________ _______ EID667492; EID667494 - EID667498_______ ___________________ EID667500___________________ ___________________ EID667508___________________ _____________ EID667523 - EID667524_____________ _____________ EID667534 - EID667537_____________ ___________________ EID667550___________________ _____________ EID667557; EID667561______________ ______ E ID 6 6 7 5 7 8 - EID6677579___________________ ___________________ EID667585___________________ _____________ EID667598 - EID667599_____________ _____________ EID667627; EID667632______________ _____________ EID667686 - EID667687_____________ ___________________ EID667743___________________ _____________ EID667767 - EID667768_____________ _____________ EID667795 - EID667797_____________ _____________ EID668810 - EID668812_____________ _____________ EID668810 - EID668812_____________ _____________ EID673917 - EID673942_____________ EID673917 - EID673942 Page 46 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 273 of 326 PAGEID #: 40435 Bates Numbered Documents _____________ EID674142 - EID674164_____________ _____________ EID677679 - EID677691_____________ ___________________ EID677909___________________ _____________ EID692256 - EID692263_____________ _____________ E ID 692749-E ID 692757_____________ _____________ EID692808 - EID692810_____________ EID704494 - EID704495; RP026263 - RP026264 EID713311 - EID713313; AJP001380 - AJP001382 EID713314 - EID713316; AJP001396- AJP001398 _____________ EID713317; AJP001393_____________ EID713318 - EID713321; AJP001385 - AJP001388 _____________ EID713322; AJP001383_____________ EID713323 - EID713327; AJP001441 - AJP001445 EID713328 - EID713329; AJP001394 - AJP001395 EID713330 - EID713334; AJP001332 - AJP001336 EID713335 - EID713342; JW000095 - JW000102 EID713343 - EID713346; AJP002494 - AJP002497 EID713347 - EID713349; WEF000664 - WEF000666 _____________ EID713370; AJP001378_____________ _____________ EID713402 - EID713408_____________ _____________ EID713409 - EID713410_____________ _____________ EID713411 - EID713414_____________ _____________ EID713415 - EID713416_____________ ___________________ EID713417___________________ _____________ EID713418 - EID713424_____________ _____________ EID713425 - EID713426_____________ _____________ EID713427 - EID713434_____________ _____________ EID713435 - EID713442_____________ _________________EID713595 - 96_________________ ___________________ EID713597___________________ ___________________ EID713598___________________ EID713815 - EID713816; EXP000001 - EXP000002 EID713817 - EID713819; EXP000003 - EXP000005 EID713823 - EID713824; EXP000009 - EXP000010 EID713825 - EID713826; EXP000011 - EXP000012 EID713834 - EID713835; EXP000020 - EXP000021 EID713849 - EID713850; EXP000035 - EXP000036 EID713856 - EID713857; EXP000042 - EXP000043 EID713863 - EID713865; EXP000049 - EXP000051 EID713866 - EID713868; EXP000052 - EXP000054 EID713869 - EID713874; EXP000055 - EXP000060 EID713875 - EID713876; EXP000061 - EXP000062 EID713877 - EID713879; EXP000063 - EXP000065 EID713880 - EID713882; EXP000066 - EXP000068 Page 47 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 274 of 326 PAGEID #: 40436 Bates Numbered Documents EID713883 - EID713885; EXP000069 - EXP000071 EID713888 - EID713890; EXP000074 - EXP000076 EID713891 - EID713893; EXP000077 - EXP000079 EID713894 - EID713920; EXP000080 - EXP000106 EID714048 - EID0714049; SPR000131 - SPR000132 EID714144 - EID0714148; SPR000227 - SPR000231 EID714667 - EID714684; SPR000756 - SPR000773 EID715370 - EID715382; W AB002591 - WAB002603 EID715485 - EID715487; WAB002768 - W AB002770 ___________________ EID717369___________________ ___________________ EID717377___________________ EID717943 - EID717944; AVM 010265 - AMR010266 EID718035 - EID718037; AVM 010358 - AVM 010360 EID718044 - EID718046; AVM 010367 - AVM 010369 EID718050 - EID718052; AVM 010373 - AVM 010375 EID718056 - EID718058; AVM 010379 - AVM 010381 EID718056 - EID718058; AVM 010379 - AVM 010381 EID718144 - EID718149; AVM 010467 - AVM 010472 EID718624 - EID718632; AVM 010951 - AVM 010959 EID718838 - EID718841; AVM 011183 - AVM 011186 EID718838 - EID718861; AVM 011183 - AVM 011206 EID719207 - EID719208; BLH000506 - BLH0005007 EID719436 - EID719436; CAB000400 - CAB000429 EID720390 - EID720391; DFA006653 - DFA006654 EID721452 - EID721454; DM R019309 - DMR019311 EID721455 - EID721457; DM R019312 - DMR019314 EID721510 - EID721513; DM R019367 - DMR019370 EID721514 - EID721516; DMR019371 - DMR019373 EID723797 - EID723800; GHS007360 - GHS007363 _____________ EID724013; GHS007576_____________ _____________ EID725332; GHS008965_____________ EID725599 - EID725605; GHS009275 - GHS009281 _____________ EID729895; JHH001600_____________ _____________ EID730072; JHH001777_____________ _____________ EID730073; JHH001778_____________ ______________ EID730265; JLL000105______________ EID730266 - EID730267; JLL000106 - JLL000107 EID732006 - EID732020; MAH000955 - MAH000969 EID732583 - EID732588; MAK010747 - MAK010752 _____________ EID732589; MAK010753_____________ _____________ EID732590; M AK010754_____________ EID732591 - EID732598; MAK010755 - MAK010762 EID732605 - EID732606; MAK010769 - MAK010770 EID732607 - EID732608; MAK010771 - MAK010772 Page 48 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 275 of 326 PAGEID #: 40437 Bates Numbered Documents EID732622 - EID739624; MAK010786 - MAK010788 _____________ EID732625; M AK010789_____________ EID732626 - EID762627; MAK010790 - MAK010791 EID732628 - EID73629; MAK010792 - MAK010793 EID732634 - EID732687; MAK010798 - MAK010851 _____________ EID732691; MAK010855_____________ _____________ EID732692; M AK010856_____________ _____________ EID732696; M AK010860_____________ _____________ EID732717; M AK010881_____________ _____________ EID732718; M AK010882_____________ _____________ EID732719; MAK010883_____________ _____________ EID732720; M AK010884_____________ _____________ EID732721; MAK010885_____________ EID732722 - EID732727; MAK010886 - MAK010891 _____________ EID732728; M AK010892_____________ EID732732 - EID73733; MAK010896 - MAK010897 EID732740 - EID732769; MAK010905 - MAK010934 EID732800 - EID732802; MAK010977 - MAK010979 EID732907 - EID732916; MAK011084 - MAK011093 _____________ EID732917; M AK011094_____________ EID732920 - EID732921; MAK011097 - MAK011098 _____________ EID7329252; SM K000293_____________ __________________ EID73298 - 99__________________ _________________ EID735371 - 386_________________ EID735382 - EID735386; OEPA001652 - OEPA001656 EID735480 - EID735381; OEPA001750 - OEPA001651 EID739030 - EID739032; RWR004921 - RWR004923 _____________ EID739099; RW R004990_____________ _____________ EID739101; RW R004992_____________ EID739150 - EID739151; RWR005041 - RWR005042 EID739152 - EID739153; RWR005043 - RWR005044 EID739243 - EID739245; SMK000284 - SMK000286 EID739246 - EID739247; SMK000287 - SMK000288 EID739248 - EID739484; SMK000525 - SMK000528 _____________ EID739248; SM K000289_____________ _____________ EID739257; SM K000298_____________ EID739258 - EID739259; SMK000299 - SMK000300 _____________ EID739260; SM K000301_____________ EID739425 - EID739436; SMK000466 - SMK000477 EID739451 - EID739454; SMK000492 - SMK000495 EID739451 - EID739454; SMK000492 - SMK000495 EID739455 - EID739458; SMK000496 - SMK000499 EID739466 - EID739468; SMK000507 - SMK000509 EID739488 - EID739490; SMK000529 - SMK000531 Page 49 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 276 of 326 PAGEID #: 40438 Bates Numbered Documents EID739488 - EID739490; SMK000529 - SMK000531 _______ EID739500; SM K000538 - SM K000541_______ EID739527 - EID739532; SMK000568 - SMK000573 EID739549 - EID739551; SMK000590 - SMK000592 ______________EID739552; SM K000593______________ EID739568 - EID739573; SMK000609 - SMK000614 ______________EID739702; SM K000743______________ EID739703 - EID739704; SMK000744 - SMK000745 EID739717 - EID739718; SMK000758 - SMK000759 EID739724 - EID739725; SMK000766 - SMK000767 ______________EID739740; SM K000782______________ ______________EID739741; SM K000783______________ EID739742 - EID739743; SMK000784 - SMK000785 EID739786 - EID739794; SMK000828 - SMK000836 EID739809 - EID739809; SMK000851 - SMK000858 __________________ EID740005-17__________________ ______________EID740018; SM K001060______________ EID740136 - EID740140; SMK001178 - SMK001152 EID740141 - EID740143; SMK001183 - SMK001185 EID740144 - EID740146; SMK001186 - SMK001188 EID740153 - EID740161; SMK001195 - SMK001203 EID740179 - EID740182; SMK001221 - SMK001224 EID740349 - EID740351; SMK001391 - SMK001393 EID740390 - EID740459; SMK001432 - SMK001501 EID740484 - EID740490; SMK001526 - SMK001332 EID740556 - EID740557; SMK001598- SMK001599 EID740558 - EID740584; SMK001600- SMK001626 EID740586 - EID740606; EDI740585; SMK001628____________ SM K001648; SM K0011627____________ EID740728 - EID740756; SMK001770 - SMK001798 EID740757 - EID740766; SMK001799 - SMK001808 EID740788 - EID740808; SMK001830 - SMK001850 EID740840 - EID740849; SMK001882 - SMK001891 EID740871 - EID740891; SMK001913 - SMK001933 EID740896 - EID740905; SMK001938 - SMK001947 EID740937 - EID740946; SMK001979 - SMK001988 EID740947 - EID740974; SMK001989 - SMK002016 EID740977 - EID740981; SMK002019 - SMK002023 EID740985 - EID740987; SMK002027 - SMK002029 ______________EID740994; SM K002036______________ EID741905 - EID741906; STB009043 - STB009044 EID742436 - EID742437; STB009574 - STB009575 EID743484 - EID743487; UMC000825 - UMC0008928 EID743535 - EID743552; UM C000876 - UMC000893 Page 50 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 277 of 326 PAGEID #: 40439 Bates Numbered Documents EID743553 - EID743561; UMC000894 - UMC000902 EID744023 - EID744027; YJC000110 - YJC000114 _____________ EID746325 - EID746330_____________ ___________________ EID747575___________________ ___________________ EID747588___________________ _____________ EID747591 - EID747595_____________ _____________ EID747596 - EID747597_____________ _____________ EID747598 - EID747599_____________ _____________ EID747600 - EID747601_____________ ___________________ EID747602___________________ ___________________ EID747611___________________ ___________________ EID747612___________________ ___________________ EID747792___________________ _______________ E ID 7 4 9 7 5 8 -749770_______________ ___________________ EID751241___________________ _____________ EID751377 - EID751379_____________ _____________ EID757301 - EID757304_____________ _____________ EID759672 - EID759682_____________ _____________ EID759922 - EID759926_____________ _____________ EID768251 - EID768255_____________ _____________ EID768267 - EID768269_____________ _____________ EID768348 - EID768356_____________ _____________ EID768391 - EID768396_____________ _____________ EID768398 - EID768399_____________ _____________ EID768542 - EID768569_____________ ______________ EID768585 - EID76587______________ _____________ EID769152 - EID769157_____________ _____________ EID769227 - EID769229_____________ ___________________ EID769230___________________ _____________ EID769235 - EID769237_____________ _____________ EID769238 - EID769241_____________ _____________ EID769242 - EID769243_____________ _____________ EID769246 - EID769253_____________ _____________ EID769254 - EID769257_____________ ___________________ EID769258___________________ ___________________ EID769259___________________ ___________________ EID769260___________________ ___________________ EID770683___________________ _____________ EID771147 - EID771149_____________ _____________ EID771396 - EID771403_____________ _____________ EID772074 - EID772092_____________ _____________ EID772336 - EID772344_____________ _____________ EID772466 - EID772484_____________ EID772537 - EID772538 Page 51 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 278 of 326 PAGEID #: 40440 Bates Numbered Documents _____________________ EID772547_____________________ _______________ EID772726 - EID772744_______________ _______________ EID773365 - EID773393_______________ _______________ EID773414 - EID773445_______________ _________________ E ID 7 7 3 4 4 6 -773452_________________ ______________EID773588 - EIDEID773589______________ _______________ EID773590 - EID773591_______________ _______________ EID773755 - EID773831_______________ _______________ EID773832 - EID773895_______________ _______________ EID773896 - EID773958_______________ _________ EID773959 - EID774023; 0008 - 0063_________ __________ EID774024 - EID4084; 0008 - 0059__________ _________ EID774145 - EID774211; 0008 - 0065_________ _________ EID774212 - EID774276; 0008 - 0063_________ _________ EID774277 - EID774340; 0008 - 0062_________ _______________ EID774341 - EID774395_______________ _______________ EID774396 - EID774427_______________ EID774428 - EID774446; 003614 - 003632 _______________ EID774447 - EID774485_______________ _______________ EID774486 - EID774510_______________ _______________ EID774511 - EID774541_______________ _________________ EID774542 - 774544_________________ _______________ EID774753 - EID774771_______________ _______________ EID774772 - EID774787_______________ _______________ EID774772 - EID774787_______________ _______________ EID775004 - EID775011_______________ EID775012 - EID775044; ASH027012 - ASH027044 _______________ EID775082 - EID775085_______________ _______________ EID775086 - EID775100_______________ _______________ EID775101 - EID775119_______________ _______________ EID775177 - EID775185_______________ _______________ EID775648 - EID775651_______________ _______________ EID775652 - EID775655_______________ _______________ EID775656 - EID775659_______________ _______________ EID775660 - EID775664_______________ _____________________ EID775665_____________________ _____________________ EID775666_____________________ _______________ EID775682 - EID775708_______________ _______________ EID775917; D M R 034527_______________ EID778894 - EID778929; A K M 000099 - AKM 000134; EID EID778894 - EID778967; AKM000099 - AKM000172 _____________________ EID781977_____________________ _____________________ EID781980_____________________ EID781981 Page 52 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 279 of 326 PAGEID #: 40441 Bates Numbered Documents ______________________ EID781982______________________ ______________________ EID781983______________________ ______________________ EID781984______________________ ______________________ EID781985______________________ ______________________ EID781986______________________ ______________________ EID781987______________________ ______________________ EID781988______________________ ______________________ EID781989______________________ ______________________ EID781990______________________ ______________________ EID781991______________________ ______________________ EID781992______________________ ______________________ EID781993______________________ EID794824 - EID794829; DMR034418 - DMR034423 EID797460- EID797465; GK012756 - GK012761 EID797645 - EID797648; GK012943 - GK012946 EID797661 - EID797664; GK012959 - GK012962 EID797680 - EID797713; GK012978 - GK013011; 000093 ________________________ 0 0 0 1 2 6 ________________________ EID797987 - EID797996; GK013323 - GK013332 EID797997 - EID798004; GK013385 - GK013392 EID798064 - EID798067; GK013616 - GK013619 EID798122 - EID798208; GK013674 - GK013760 EID798256 - EID798287; GK013808 - GK013839 EID798346 - EID798350; GK014118 - GK014122 EID800823 - EID800833; PEG000032 - PEG000042 EID803332 - EID803340; RWR011335 - RWR011343 _______________ EID806680; U M C 002358________________ _______________ EID806680; U M C 002358________________ ________________ EID807895 - EID807939________________ ________________ EID807895 - EID807939________________ ________________ EID812120 - EID812139________________ ________________ EID813781 - EID813804________________ ________________ EID813781 - EID813804________________ ________________ EID822000 - EID822007________________ ______________________ EID822918______________________ ______________________ EID823518______________________ ______________________ EID823519______________________ ________________ EID824337 - EID824339________________ ________________ EID829871 - EID829883________________ ______________________ EID830359______________________ ________________ EID832305 - EID832353________________ ________________ EID832415 - EID832471________________ ________________ EID832824 - EID832830________________ EID834662 - EID834673 Page 53 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 280 of 326 PAGEID #: 40442 Bates Numbered Documents ______________EID834712 - EID834723______________ ______________EID838511 - EID838521______________ ______________EID844214 - EID844217______________ ______________EID845892 - EID845908______________ ______________EID863826 - EID863828______________ ______________EID865335 - EID865359______________ ______________EID866746 - EID866752______________ ______________EID866762 - EID866764______________ ______________EID871298 - EID871400______________ ______________EID871401 - EID871406______________ ______________EID871401 - EID871410______________ ______________EID871401 - EID871410______________ ______________EID871401 - EID871410______________ EID900308 - EID900313; RJA000374 - RJA000379 EID901002 - EID901003; JRB002174 - JRB002175 EID903496 - EID903497; C F001391- CF001392 EID909790 - EID909809; DE000245 - DE000264 EID909790 - EID909809; DE000245 - DE000264 EID909811 - EID909819; DE000267 - DE000275 EID909812 - EID909818; DE000268 - DE000268 ______________ EID909865; DE000321______________ ______________ EID909873; DE000329______________ ____________________ EID909875____________________ _________________ EID909896 - 98_________________ ______________EID914312; ASH010166______________ EID914338 - EID914339; ASH010221 - ASH010222 EID914342 - EID914348; ASH010256 - ASH010262 EID914722 - EID914725; LKI001266 - LKI001269 EID914730 - EID914733; LMK001319 - LMK001322 EID914744 - EID914745; LKI001338 - LKI001339 EID914909 - EID914913; LKI001762 - LKI001766 ______________ EID914998; DDJ000386______________ ______________ EID914999; DDJ000388______________ EID915033 - EID915035; DDJ000667 - DDJ000669 EID915061 - EID915062; DDJ000701 - DDJ000702 EID915269 - EID915271; DDJ001043 - DDJ001048 ______________EID916604 - EID916609______________ EID917493 - EID917494; M EM 000452 - M EM 000453 EID917773 - EID917774; GLK000037 - GLK000038 ______________ EID918667; GLK002513______________ EID919846 - EID919849; AVM 001965 - AVM 001968 EID919850 - EID919851; AVM 001969 - AVM 001970 EID919948 - EID919971; JM M 000002 - JM M 000047 EID920083 - EID920085; JM M 000659 - JM M 000661 Page 54 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 281 of 326 PAGEID #: 40443 Bates Numbered Documents __________________ EID920176; JM M 0 0 1 0 6 8 __________________ EID920316 - EID920366; JM M 001296 - JM M 001346 EID920397 - EID920414; JM M 001463 - JM M 001478; _________________ JM M 00151 0; J M M 00164 6_________________ EID920645 - EID920662; JM M 002496 - JM M 002513 EID920663 - EID920668; JM M 002528 - JM M 002533 EID920673 - EID920674; JM M 002667 - JM M 002668 ________________________ EID921553________________________ EID921569 - EID921590; JM M 008051 - JM M 008072 EID921593 - EID921594; JM M 008216 - JM M 008217 EID921834 - EID921855; JCQC000060 - JCQC000081 EID921915 - EID921922; SRP00011- SRP000016 EID921932 - EID921942; SRP000028 - SRP000038 __________________ EID921943 - EID921946__________________ ________EID922136 - 922138; SRP000267 - SRP000269________ EID922355 - EID922359; SRP000488 - SRP000492 ________EID922360 - 922362; SRP000493 - SRP000495________ EID922363 - EID922368; SRP000497 - SRP000501 EID922968 - EID922976 - SRP001216 - SRP001224 EID922977 - EID922982 - SRP001225 - SRP001230 _______ EID923989 - EID923990; RP002196 - RP002197_______ EID924131 - EID924151; AJP001110 - AJP001130 EID924190 - EID924196; AJP001569 - AJP001574 EID924218 - EID924221; AJP001611 - AJP001614 EID924222 - EID924225; AJP001615 - AJP001618 EID924226 - EID924228; AJP001621 - AJP001622 ___________________EID924234; AJP001629___________________ EID924240 - EID924259; AJP001659- AJP001663; AJP001669________________________ AJP001683________________________ EID924260- EID924265; AJP001689 - AJP001694 EID924268 - EID924273; AJP001698 - AJP001703 EID924274 - EID924275; AJP001704 - AJP001705 EID924451 - EID924479; AJP002211 - AJP002214; AJP002216 ____________ AJP002218; AJP002226 - AJP002247____________ EID924458 - EID924460; AJP002226 - AJP002228 EID924497 - EID924498; EID931225 - EID931229; AJP002531 ____________ AJP-002532; RJZ003289 - RJZ003293____________ __________________ EID924499 - EID924504__________________ ___________________EID924525; AJP002584___________________ EID924526 - EID924538; AJP002672 - AJP002684 __________________ EID924731 - EID924737__________________ EID924766 - EID924768; AJP003468 - AJP003470 EID924769 - EID924775; AJP003471 - AJP003472; AJP003481 - AJP003485 Page 55 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 282 of 326 PAGEID #: 40444 Bates Numbered Documents EID924790 - EID924791; AJP003535 - AJP003536 EID925024 - EID925051; JS000097 - JS000124 EID926315 - EID926327; RLR000172 - RLR000184 EID926857 - EID926859; RLR001758 - RLR001760 _____________ EID927217; RLR002762_____________ _____________ EID927218; RLR002763_____________ EID927380 - EID927381; HDR000317 - HDR000318 EID927410 - EID927414; HDR000485 - HDR000489 ____________ EID927451; HDR001261_____________ EID927609 - EID927610; RV000480 - RV000481 EID932089 - EID932090; RJZ004157 - RJZ004158 EID932730 - EID932731; RJZ004924 - RJZ004927 EID932994 - EID932999; RJZ006549 - RJZ006554 EID933681 - EID933687; RJZ2007414 - RJZ007420 EID933689 - EID933690; RJZ007422 - RJZ007423 EID933892 - EID933909; RJZ007664 - RJZ007681 EID933910 - EID933919; RJZ007687 - RJZ007696 EID933951 - EID933964; RJZ007728 - RJZ007741 EID933965 - EID933986; RJZ007742 - RJZ007763 EID935007 - EID935009; RJZ008920 - RJZ008922 EID935010 - EID935011; RJZ008923 - RJZ008924 _____________ EID935012; RJZ008925_____________ _____________ EID935123; RJZ009202_____________ _____________ EID935124; RJZ009203_____________ EID935128 - EID935139; RJZ009231 - RJZ009242 _____________EID935152 - EID935157_____________ EID935370 - EID935376; RJZ009653 - RJZ009659 EID935383 - EID935385; RJZ009666 - RJZ009667 EID935477 - EID935479; RJZ010010 - RJZ010012 EID935529 - EID935534; RJZ010077 - RJZ010082 EID935596 - EID935599; RJZ10146 - RJZ010149 EID935611 - EID935618; RJZ010161 - RJZ010168 _____________ EID935624; RJZ010174_____________ EID936785 - EID936786; RJZ011946 - RJZ011947 _____________ EID937562; RJZ013154_____________ _____________ EID938073; RJZ014434_____________ _____________EID943631 - EID943690_____________ EID943691 - EID943717; RJZ020538 - RJZ020564 ____________ EID948790 - RAK004373____________ EID948837 - EID948838; GPS000586 - GPS000587 EID948850 - EID948851; ASH000020 - ASH000021 EID948901 - EID948905; ASH000069 - ASH000073 EID948979 - EID948980; LKI001686 - LKI001687 EID949256 - EID949261; AC003327 - AC003332 Page 56 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 283 of 326 PAGEID #: 40445 Bates Numbered Documents EID949262 - EID949264; AC003333 - AC003335 EID949281 - EID949286; AC003354 - AC003359 EID949287 - EID949288; AC003363 - AC003364 EID949289 - EID949303; AC003386 - AC003400 EID949304 - EID949305; AC003401 - AC003402 EID949306 - EID949322; AC003403 - AC003419 EID949323 - EID949337; AC003420 - AC003434 EID949338 - EID949355; AC003435 - AC003452 EID949356 - EID949380; AC003453 - AC003477 EID949381 - EID949396; AC003478 - AC003493 EID949397 - EID949414; AC003494 - AC003511 EID949415 - EID949416; AC003512 - AC003513 EID949417 - EID949418; AC003514 - AC003515 EID949419 - EID949436; AC003516 - AC003533 EID949437 - EID949439; AC003534 - AC003536 _________________ EID949449; AC003618_________________ _________________ EID949451; AC003548_________________ _________________ EID949452; AC003550__________________ EID949453 - EID949456; AC00003551 - AC003554 EID949457 - EID949484; AC003555 - AC003582 EID949485 - EID949486; AC003583 - AC003584 _________________ EID949487; AC003587__________________ EID949488 - EID949489; AC003588 - AC003589 EID949490 - EID949491; AC003590 - AC003591 EID949490 - EID949491; AC003590 - AC003591 _________________ EID949492; AC003592__________________ _________________ EID949492; AC003592__________________ EID949493 - EID949517; AC003593 - AC003617 EID949518 - EID949535; AC003688 - AC003705 EID949536 - EID949538; AC003706 - AC003708 EID949542 - EID949554; AC003720 - AC003732 EID949555 - EID949557; AC003733 - AC003735 EID949558 - EID949559; AC003736 - AC003737 EID949560 - EID949573; AC003754 - AC003767 _________________EID949771; OTG000325_________________ EID950217 - EID950218; GLK001289 - GLK001290 _________________ EID950227; GLK001925_________________ EID950228 - EID950242; GLK002519 - GLK02533 EID950267 - EID950271; RL001954 - RL001958 EID950513 - EID950525; SRP001466 - SRP001478 EID950621 - EID950624; CS000259 - CS000262 EID950991 - EID951002; GW 007238 - GW 007249; 000001 ________________________ 000008_________________________ EID951469 - EID951470; RJZ009513 - RJZ009514 Page 57 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 284 of 326 PAGEID #: 40446 Bates Numbered Documents EID951480 - EID951481; RJZ009525 - RJZ009526 EID951505 - EID951506; RJZ009903 - RJZ9904 EID951507 - EID951511; RJZ009905 - RJZ009909 _____________ EID951512; RJZ009911_____________ _____________ EID951517; RJZ009916_____________ EID951520 - EID951522; RJZ009919 - RJZ009921 EID951548 - EID951549; RJZ009949 - RJZ009950 EID951550 - EID951551; RJZ009951 - RJZ009952 EID951554 - EID951555; RJZ009955 - RJZ009955.01 _____________ EID951556; RJZ009956_____________ EID951560 - EID951564; RJZ009974 - RJZ009978 EID951565 - EID951567; RJZ009980 - RJZ009982 EID951568 - EID951570; RJZ009980 - RJZ009985 EID951584 - EID951591; RJZ010002 - RJZ010009 _____________ EID951607; RJZ010454_____________ EID951966 - EID951973; RJZ020580 - RJZ020587 EID952019 - EID952024; RJZ020668 - RJZ020673 EID952076 - EID952084; RJZ020999 - RJZ021007 _____________ EIE009891 - EIE009893_____________ _____________ EIE009892 - EIE009893_____________ _____________ EIE012637 - EIE012643_____________ ______________ EIE012653 - EIE12658______________ ___________________ EIE012660___________________ ___________ E N V 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - ENV0000004___________ ___________ ENV0000005 - ENV0000022___________ ___________ E N V 0 0 0 1 1 6 1 - ENV0001169___________ __________________ ENV0002140__________________ ___________ ENV0002222 - ENV0002227___________ ___________ ENV0002222 - ENV0002227___________ ___________ ENV0002607 - ENV0003017___________ ___________ ENV0004663 - ENV0004699___________ ___________ ENV0004700 - ENV0004708___________ ___________ ENV0004709 - ENV0004718___________ ___________ ENV0004721 - ENV0004731___________ ___________ ENV0004732 - ENV0004735___________ ___________ ENV0004736 - ENV0004738___________ ___________ ENV0004739 - ENV0004745___________ ___________ ENV0004746 - ENV0004752___________ ___________ ENV0005466 - ENV0005473___________ ___________ ENV0005474 - ENV0005509___________ ___________ ENV0005474 - ENV0005509___________ ___________ ENV0005474 - ENV0005509___________ ___________ ENV0005510 - ENV0005536___________ ENV0005510 - ENV0005536 Page 58 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 285 of 326 PAGEID #: 40447 Bates Numbered Documents ___________ENV0005510 - ENV0005536___________ ___________ENV0006077 - ENV0006087___________ ___________ENV0006088 - ENV0006118___________ ENV0006601 - ENV0006606; T2459 - T2463 __________________ ENV0006632__________________ __________________ ENV0006650__________________ ___________ENV0006651 - ENV0006652___________ __________________ ENV0006682__________________ __________________ ENV0006685__________________ __________________ ENV0006686__________________ __________________ ENV0006741__________________ ___________ ENV004719 - ENV0004720___________ EPL000040 - EPL000041; EID713595 - EID713596 EXP001127 - EXP001186; 0008 - 0060 ____________ EXP002123 - EXP002138____________ ____________ E X P 002139- EXP002174____________ ____________ EXP015665 - EXP015715____________ ____________ E X P 015862- EXP015876____________ ___________________EXP015877___________________ _____________ E X P 019010- EXP19018_____________ ________EXP019664.078 - EXP019664.0081_______ ____________GAA001684 - GAA001687____________ GHA012776 - GHS012777; EID796495 - EID796496 GHS005702 - GHS005703; EID605381 - EID605381 GHS005720 - GHS005728; EID605399 - EID605407 GHS005734 - GHS005735; EID605413 - EID605414 GHS005924 - GHS005927; EID605603 - EID605606 GHS006489 - GHS006493; EID722942 - EID722946 _____________GHS007076; EID723513_____________ _____________GHS007162; EID723599____________ GHS008008 - GHS008019; EID724444 - EID724455 GHS008401 - GHS008402; EID724837 - EID724838 GHS008474 - GHS008477; EID724910- EID724913 GHS008513 - GHS008518; EID724949 - EID724954 GHS008602 - GHS008603; EID725038 - EID725039 GHS008890 - GHS008891; EID725264 - EID725265 GHS010084 - GHS010312; EID726394 - EID726622 GHS010406 - GHS010409; EID795055 - EID795058 GHS010412 - GHS010428; EID795061 - EID795077 _____________GHS011109; EID795599____________ GHS011389 - GHS011390; EID795856 - EID795857 GHS012291 - GHS012300; EID796046 - EID796055 _____________GHS012519; EID796243_____________ GHS012670 - GHS012718; EID796389 - EID796437 Page 59 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 286 of 326 PAGEID #: 40448 Bates Numbered Documents __________________ GHS012899; EID796585__________________ GHS012900 - GHS012921; EID796586 - EID796607 GHS012922 - GHS012934; EID796608 - EID796620 GHS012922 - GHS012934; EID796608 - EID796620 GHS012980 - GHS012981; EID796663 - EID796664 GHS013033 - GHS013043; EID796704 - EID796714 GHS013086 - GHS013089; EID796757 - EID796760 ___________________ GK000044 - GK000051__________________ ___________________ GK000139 - GK000146__________________ ___________________ GK000665 - GK000666__________________ ___________________ GK002049 - GK002067__________________ _________________________ GK002068________________________ ___________________ GK002126 - GK002141__________________ ___________________ GK002142 - GK002147__________________ _________________________ GK005063________________________ ___________________ GK005719 - GK005720__________________ ___________________ GK005719 - GK005720__________________ _______ GK011475 - GK011490; EID603099 - EID603114 _______ GK012493 - GK012501; EID727386 - EID727394 GK013307 - GKGK013315; EID797971 - EID797979 GK014018 - GK014026; EID777400 - 777408; EID800823 ____________ EID800833; PEG000032 - PEG000042____________ ___________________ GKO12829; EID797531__________________ GLK001453 - GLK001457; EID918163 - EID918167 GLK002452 - GLK002457; EID918615 - EID918620 GLK002519 - GLK002525; EID950228 - EID950234; GLK002527 ____________ GLK002533; EID950236 - EID950242____________ GPS000629 - GPS000629; EID927504 - EID927505 G W 028358 - GW 028363; EID727741 - EID727746 G W 028364 - GW 028377; EID727747 - EID727760 G W 028378 - GW 028394; EID727761 - EID727777 __________________ GW J019567; EID798418__________________ GW O28413 - GW O28415; EID727796 - EID727798 HDR001193 - HDR001196; EID058072 - EID058075 HDR002553 - HDR002555; EID167154 - EID167156 HDR002553 - HDR002555; EID167154 - EID167156 HDR002553 - HDR002555; EID167154 - EID167156 __________________HDR005845 - HDR005846_________________ __________________HDR006057 - HDR006060_________________ __________________HDR006205 - HDR006206_________________ __________________ HDR006763; EID522656__________________ HDR007586 - HDR007588; EID728176 - EID728178 ________________________ HLG 001871_______________________ HLG001870 Page 60 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 287 of 326 PAGEID #: 40449 Bates Numbered Documents HLG001871; LWB005659 - LWB005659; EID636263 ____________________ EID636269____________________ HLG001871; LWB005659 - LWB005665; EID636263 ____________________ EID636269____________________ ________________ H L G 001889-001913_______________ ________________ H L G 002035-002062_______________ ________________ H L G 002063-002085_______________ HLG002324 - HLG002326; EID609081 - EID609083 HLG002486 - HLG002512; EID609243 - EID609269 HLG002514 - HLG002515; EID609271 - EID609272 _____________ HOLT02895 - HOLT02901_____________ IJZ003496 - IJZ003499; EID728976 - EID728979 _____________J A A 0003497- JAA0003501____________ JM M 004049 -JM M 004073; USEPA8669 - USEPA8693 JM M 008015 -JM M 008016; EID073298; EID073299 JM M 008018 - JM M 008020; EID073300 - EID073302 JRB004778 - JRB004794; EID506008 - EID506024 ______________ JRB004795 -JRB004812______________ ______________ JS O 004944- JSO004955______________ KEL000533 - KEL000537; EID730428 - EID730432 _________________ L D H 361- LDH363_________________ ___________________ LE3897-3936___________________ ___________________ LE3987-4008___________________ ___________________ LE4010-4179___________________ ___________________ LE5789-5839___________________ _____________________ LHWA001____________________ _____________________ LHWA002____________________ LPSD137 - LPSD138; EID112971; DDJ001815 ________________ LPSD143 - LPSD144________________ _____________________ LPSD7175_____________________ _______________ LPSD7176 - LPSD7184_______________ _______________ LPSD7186 - LPSD7200_______________ LWB00740 - LWB000745; EID213164 - EID213169 _______________ M A H 0 0 0 4 2 9 -000564_______________ M AH000998 - M AH001001; EID7322049 - EID732052 MAK002612 - MAK002621; EID252953 - EID252962 _____________ M AK007462 - M AK007504_____________ MAK008091 - MAK008094; EID610565 - EID610568 MAK008248 - MAK008253; EID610683 - EID610688 MAK008280 - MAK008281; EID610715 - EID610716 MAK008339 - MAK008357; EID610773 - EID610791 MAK008689 - MAK008712; EID611122 - EID611145 MAK008804 - MAK008820; EID611237 - EID611253 MAK008804 - MAK008820; EID611237 - EID611253 Page 61 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 288 of 326 PAGEID #: 40450 Bates Numbered Documents MAK008804 - MAK008820; EID611237 - EID611253 MAK008804 - MAK008820; EID611237 - EID611253 ______________M AK008829; EID611262______________ MAK009075 - MAK009085; EID611508 - EID611518 MAK009075 - MAK009085; EID611508 - EID611518 MAK009125 - MAK009128; EID611558 - EID611561 MAK010526 - MAK010561; EID612959 - EID612994 MAK010852 - MAK010853; EID732688 - EID732689 MAK010861 - MAK010879; EID732697 - EID732715 ______________M AK010902; EID732738______________ ______________M AK010903; EID732739______________ ______________M AK011526; EID733343______________ MAK011527 - MAK011554; EID733344 - EID733371 MAK011555 - MAK011582; EID733372 - EID733399 MAK011813 - MAK0011824; EID733629 - EID733640 MLR002254 - MLR002257; EID799992 - EID799995 MLR002340 - MLR002342; EID800070 - EID800072 MLR002357 - MLR002361; EID800087 - EID800091 NKT000001 - NKT000001; EID735221 - EID735222 NKT000003 - NKT000004; EID735223 - EID735224 NSR000300 - NSR000306; EID735328 - EID735334 NSR000307 - NSR000308; EID735335 - EID735336 NSR000309 - NSR000311; EID735337 - EID735339 _________________ OPPT-2003-0012_________________ PEG000032 - PEG000032; EID800823 - EID800833 PJB000371 - PJB000374; EID196253 - EID196256 PJB003901 - PJB003902; EID613593 - EID613594 PJB003955 - PJB003956; EID613647 - EID613648 PJB003957 - PJB003967; EID613649 - EID613659 PJB004029 - PJB004043; EID685105 - EID685119 ______________ PJB004082 - PJB004084______________ PNC000053 - PNC000060; EID736556 - EID736563 _________________ PUB070 - PUB071_________________ RAH004023 - RAH004025; EID736684 - EID736686 RAK012623-RAK012624; EID736722-EID736723 RB001222 - RB001223; EID614225 - EID614226 ___________________ RCW 002019____________________ RGS000005 - RGS000007; EID217933 - EID217935 ______________ RH008522 - RH008597_______________ ______________RH009049; EDD0072900______________ RH009050 - RH009052; RGS000005 - RGS000007 ______________ RID746951 - EID746962______________ RJZ009207; USEPA14986 - USEPA14987; DAW 000638 RJZ009207; USEPA8850 Page 62 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 289 of 326 PAGEID #: 40451 Bates Numbered Documents RJZ009208 - RJZ009208; USEPA14965 - USEPA14966 RJZ009208 - RJZ009211; USEPA14965 - USEPA14968 RJZ032721 - RJZ032722; EID185185 - EID185186 RLR001349 - RLR001449; EXP002362 - EXP002462 RLR001349 - RLR001449; EXP002362 - EXP002462 ________________ RLR002787;EID927242________________ RLR002788 - RLR002792; EID927243 - EID927247 RLR002899 - RLR002902; EID076927 - EID076930 ________________ RLR015836; EID801701________________ RLR016790 - RLR016792; EID802644 - EID802646 ____________ ROWE 057563 - ROW E057564____________ _____________ROW E001180 - ROWE001181_____________ ____________________ ROW E002360____________________ _____________ROW E002361 - ROWE002362_____________ ____________________ ROWE002363____________________ ____________________ ROW E002364____________________ ____________________ ROWE002365____________________ ____________________ ROW E002366____________________ _____________ROW E002367 - ROWE002373_____________ _____________ROW E002374 - ROWE002379_____________ _____________ROW E002380 - ROWE002385_____________ _____________ RQ W E003940-RQW E003942_____________ ____________________ ROW E004000____________________ _____________ROW E006696 - ROWE006701_____________ ROWE006756 - ROWE006769; ASH019595 - ASH019602; ________________EID630029 - EID630036________________ _____________ROW E006770 - ROWE006771_____________ _____________ROW E006772 - ROWE006780_____________ _____________ROWE006785 - ROWE006786_____________ _____________ROW E006787 - ROWE006793_____________ _____________ROW E006794 - ROWE006797_____________ _____________ROW E006798 - ROWE006805_____________ _____________ROW E006806 - ROWE006807_____________ ____________________ ROW E006808____________________ ____________________ ROW E006809____________________ _____________ROW E006810 - ROWE006817_____________ _____________ROW E006818 - ROWE006819_____________ _____________ROW E006820 - ROWE006823_____________ _____________ROW E006824 - ROWE006825_____________ _____________ROW E006826 - ROWE006830_____________ _____________ROW E006832 - ROWE006833_____________ _____________ROW E006834 - ROWE006836_____________ _____________ROW E006837 - ROWE006843_____________ ROWE006844 - ROWE006845 Page 63 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 290 of 326 PAGEID #: 40452 Bates Numbered Documents ___________________ ROW E006846___________________ ____________ROW E006851 - ROWE006853____________ ____________ROW E006854 - ROWE006855____________ ___________________ ROW E006856___________________ ___________________ ROW E006857___________________ ____________ROW E006858 - ROWE006859____________ ____________ROW E006860 - ROWE006861____________ ____________ROW E008996 - ROW E009008____________ ____________ROW E009009 - ROWE009010____________ ___________________ ROW E009011___________________ ___________________ ROW E009012___________________ ___________________ ROWE009013___________________ ____________ROW E009014 - ROWE009015____________ ____________ROW E009016 - ROWE009017____________ ____________ROW E009018 - ROWE009019____________ ____________ROW E009020 - ROW E009024____________ ____________ROWE009025 - ROWE009031____________ ____________ROW E009032 - ROW E009038____________ ___________________ ROW E009039___________________ ___________________ ROW E009040___________________ ___________________ ROW E009041___________________ ____________ROW E009047 - ROW E009054____________ ____________ROW E009070 - ROWE009073____________ ____________ROW E009074 - ROWE009076____________ ____________ROW E009077 - ROWE009077____________ ___________________ ROWE009123___________________ ____________ ROW E009136 -ROW E009147____________ ____________ROW E009148 - ROW E009164____________ ROWE009166 - ROWE009183; EID215140 - EID215157 ____________ROW E009191 - ROWE009193____________ ____________ROW E009194 - ROWE009197____________ ___________________ ROW E009198___________________ ___________________ ROW E009199___________________ ___________________ ROW E009200___________________ ___________________ ROW E009201___________________ ___________________ ROW E009202___________________ ____________ROWE009203 - ROWE009235____________ ____________ROW E009236 - ROWE009239____________ ____________ROW E009240 - ROWE009241____________ ROWE009242 - ROWE009254; EID87401 - EID87410 ____________ROWE009255 - ROWE009261____________ ____________ROW E009262 - ROWE009270____________ ____________ROW E009276 - ROWE009281____________ ROWE009282 - ROWE009286 Page 64 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 291 of 326 PAGEID #: 40453 Bates Numbered Documents __________ROW E009287 - ROW E0092991__________ __________ROW E009292 - ROW E0092998__________ __________ ROW E009299 - ROWE009303__________ __________ ROW E009348 - ROWE009349__________ __________________ ROW E009350__________________ __________ ROW E009351 - ROWE009352__________ __________ ROWE009353 - ROWE009483__________ ROWE009493 - ROWE009500; OAK0113 - OAK0120 __________________ ROW E009501__________________ __________ ROW E009502 - ROWE009503__________ __________ ROW E009504 - ROWE009507__________ __________ ROW E009508 - ROW E009584__________ __________ ROWE009585 - ROWE009587__________ __________ ROW E009588 - ROWE009592__________ __________ ROWE009593 - ROW E009594__________ __________ ROWE009595 - ROWE009606__________ __________ ROW E009607 - ROWE009623__________ __________ ROW E009624 - ROWE009632__________ __________ ROWE009633 - ROWE009637__________ __________ ROW E009638 - ROWE009652__________ __________ ROWE009653 - ROW E009654__________ __________________ ROWE009655__________________ __________ ROW E009656 - ROWE009657__________ __________________ ROW E009658__________________ __________ ROW E009667 - ROW E009668__________ __________ ROW E009669 - ROWE009671__________ __________ ROWE009675 - ROWE009739__________ __________ ROW E009740- ROW E009741__________ __________ ROW E009742- ROW E009839__________ __________ ROW E009840- ROW E009887__________ __________ ROW E009888- ROW E009897__________ __________________ ROW E009959__________________ __________________ ROW E009960__________________ __________________ ROW E009962__________________ __________________ ROWE009963__________________ __________ ROW E009964 - ROWE010113__________ __________________ ROW E010114__________________ __________ ROW E010124 - ROWE010125__________ __________ ROW E010138 - ROWE010139__________ __________ ROW E010140 - ROWE010141__________ __________________ ROW E010142__________________ __________ ROWE010143 - ROWE010146__________ __________ ROW E010147 - ROWE010175__________ ROWE010200 - ROWE010202 Page 65 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 292 of 326 PAGEID #: 40454 Bates Numbered Documents _______________ ROW E010252 - ROWE010255_______________ _______________________ ROW E010256_______________________ _______________________ ROW E010269_______________________ ROWE010271 - ROWE010275; 3MB00060661 - 3MB00060665 ROWE010276 - ROWE010281 ROWE010282 - ROWE010285 ROWE010286 - ROWE010302 ROWE010303 - ROWE010304 ROWE010305 - ROWE010311 ________ROW E010312________ ROWE010313 - ROWE010314 ROWE010315 - ROWE010355 ROWE010364 - ROWE010370 ________ROW E010371________ ________ROW E010372________ ROWE010374 - ROWE010375 ROWE010376 - ROWE010377 ROWE010378 - ROWE010379 ROWE010380 - ROWE010381 ________ROW E010382________ ________R O W E 0 1 0 3 8 3 ________ ________ROW E010384_______ ROWE010385 - ROWE010386 ROWE010388 - ROWE010389 ________R O W E 0 1 0 3 9 5 ________ ________ROW E010529________ ROWE011892 - ROWE011918 ROWE011919 - ROWE011920 ________ROW E011921________ ROWE011922 - ROWE011923 ________R O W E 0 1 6 6 8 5 ________ ROWE016686 - ROWE016687 ROWE019274 - ROWE019422 ROWE019619 - ROWE019666 ROWE019836 - ROWE019842 ROWE020096 - ROWE020097 ________R O W E 0 2 0 1 9 5 ________ ________R O W E 0 2 0 1 9 5 ________ ________R O W E 0 2 0 1 9 5 ________ ________R O W E 0 2 0 1 9 5 ________ ROWE020199 - ROWE020200 ________ROW E020618_______ ROWE020748 - ROWE020749 Page 66 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 293 of 326 PAGEID #: 40455 Bates Numbered Documents _______________ ROW E021270 - ROWE021279_______________ _______________ ROW E021788 - ROWE021789_______________ _______________ ROW E021916 - ROWE021927_______________ _______________ ROWE021943 - ROW E021944_______________ _______________ ROW E021962 - ROWE021963_______________ _______________ ROW E021962 - ROWE021963_______________ _______________ ROW E021964 - ROWE021965_______________ _______________ ROW E021964 - ROWE021965_______________ _______________ ROW E022606 - ROWE022607_______________ _______________________ ROWE022625_______________________ _______________ ROWE022763 - ROWE022772_______________ _______________________ ROW E023481_______________________ _______________ ROW E023619 - ROWE023620_______________ _______________________ ROW E023629_______________________ _______________ ROW E023827 - ROW E023834_______________ ROWE023881 - ROWE023889; 041-0002-0000302 - 041-0002 _________________________ 0000309_________________________ _______________ ROW E023890 - ROWE023902_______________ _______________________ ROWE024243_______________________ _______________ ROWE024575 - ROWE024576_______________ _______________________ ROW E024624_______________________ ___________________ ROW E024872 - ROWE___________________ _______________ ROW E024897 - ROWE024899_______________ _______________ ROW E024936 - ROWE024945_______________ _______________________ ROW E025229_______________________ _______________ ROW E025308 - ROW E025318_______________ _______________ ROW E025319 - ROWE025322_______________ _______________________ ROW E025589_______________________ _______________________ ROW E025944_______________________ _______________________ ROWE025945_______________________ _______________________ ROW E025952_______________________ _______________________ ROW E025954_______________________ _______________________ ROWE025955_______________________ _______________________ ROWE025963_______________________ _______________________ ROW E025964_______________________ _______________________ ROWE025965_______________________ _______________ ROW E026064 - ROWE026070_______________ _______________ ROW E029332 - ROWE029333_______________ _______________ ROW E029350 - ROWE029355_______________ _______________ ROW E029449 - ROWE029455_______________ _______________ ROWE029743 - ROW E029744_______________ _______________ ROWE029783 - ROWE029786_______________ _______________ ROW E029787 - ROWE029790_______________ ROWE029882 Page 67 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 294 of 326 PAGEID #: 40456 Bates Numbered Documents _______ ROW E029929_______ ROWE030359 - ROWE030364 _______ ROW E030850_______ ROWE030851 - ROWE030852 ROWE030855 - ROWE030856 ROWE031024 - ROWE031025 _______ ROW E031160_______ ROWE031181 - ROWE031188 _______ ROW E031274_______ _______ ROWE031283_______ ROWE031333 - ROWE031340 _______ ROWE031483_______ ROWE031579 - ROWE031583 _______ ROW E031680_______ ROWE031897 - ROWE031898 ROWE031912 - ROWE031914 ROWE032149 - ROWE032154 ROWE032155 - ROWE032294 ROWE032307 - ROWE032308 ROWE033447 - ROWE033448 ROWE033455 - ROWE033456 ROWE033777 - ROWE033778 _______ ROW E033794_______ ROWE033865 - ROWE033979 _______ ROW E034200_______ ROWE034207 - ROWE034208 _______ ROWE034653_______ _______ ROW E034677_______ ROWE035710 - ROWE035715 ROWE036081 - ROWE036087 _______ ROW E036891_______ _______ ROW E036892_______ ROWE036903 - ROWE036904 ROWE036905 - ROWE036960 ROWE037251 - ROWE037253 ROWE037302 - ROWE037331 _______ ROW E037802_______ ROWE038001 - ROWE038002 ROWE038063 - ROWE038104 ROWE038720 - ROWE038727 ROWE039201 - ROWE039202 ROWE039210 - ROWE039211 ROWE039214 - ROWE039215 ROWE039234 - ROWE039239 Page 68 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 295 of 326 PAGEID #: 40457 Bates Numbered Documents ________R O W E 0 3 9 4 1 5 ________ ________ROW E039521________ ROWE039596 - ROWE039597 ROWE039818 - ROWE09969B ROWE040634 - ROWE040641 ROWE040727 - ROWE040728 ROWE040729 - ROWE040731 ________ROW E040732________ ROWE040806 - ROWE040807 ________ROW E040812________ ROWE040813 - ROWE040815 ROWE040962 - ROWE040967 ________ROW E041189________ ________ROW E041791________ ROWE041801 - ROWE041895 ________R O W E 0 4 2 0 0 5 ________ ROWE042006 - ROWE042009 ROWE042089 - ROWE042095 ROWE042395 - ROWE042396 ROWE042512 - ROWE042520 ROWE042529 - ROWE042530 ROWE042656 - ROWE042657 ________ROW E042892________ ROWE043098 - ROWE043132 ROWE043251 - ROWE043252 ROWE043314 - ROWE04335 ROWE043364 - ROWE043370 ROWE043535 - ROWE043536 ________ROW E043537________ ________ROW E043538________ ________ROW E043556________ ________ROW E043558________ ________ROW E043559________ ROWE043606 - ROWE043609 ________ROW E043647________ ROWE043648 - ROWE043651 ROWE043681 - ROWE043682 ________R O W E 0 4 3 6 8 3 ________ ROWE044922 - ROWE044924 ROWE045171 - ROWE045177 ROWE045340 - ROWE045343 ROWE045375 - ROWE045376 _______ ROWE0454385_______ ROWE045663 - ROWE045667 Page 69 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 296 of 326 PAGEID #: 40458 Bates Numbered Documents ROWE046984 - ROWE046993 ________ ROW E047021________ ROWE047131 - ROWE047143 ________ ROW E047147________ ROWE047149 - ROWE047150 ROWE047772 - ROWE047777 ROWE047778 - ROWE047784 ROWE048005 - ROWE048006 ROWE048052 - ROWE048054 ROWE048055 - ROWE048056 ROWE048057 - ROWE048063 ROWE048065 - ROWE048076 ROWE048175 - ROWE048176 ROWE048264 - ROWE048315 ________ ROW E048491________ ROWE050136 - ROWE050144 ROWE050308 - ROWE050309 ROWE050310 - ROWE050312 ________ ROW E050687________ ________ ROW E050687________ ________ ROW E051170________ ROWE051206 - ROWE051207 ________ ROWE051215________ ________ ROWE051275________ ROWE051280 - ROWE051282 ROWE051283 - ROWE051284 ROWE051298 - ROWE051306 ROWE051557 - ROWE051558 ROWE051559 - ROWE051560 ROWE051612 - ROWE051615 ________ ROW E052097________ ROWE052098 - ROWE052127 ROWE052128 - ROWE052131 ROWE053199 - ROWE053200 ROWE053244 - ROWE053245 ________ ROW E053287________ ________ ROWE053325________ ROWE053371 - ROWE053372 ROWE053389 - ROWE053393A ________ ROW E053468________ ________ ROW E053472________ ________ ROW E053549________ ROWE053594 - ROWE053596 ROWE054161 - ROWE054164 Page 70 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 297 of 326 PAGEID #: 40459 Bates Numbered Documents ___________ ROWE054165 - ROWE054167____________ ___________________ ROW E054209___________________ ___________________ ROW E054214___________________ ___________________ ROWE054233___________________ ___________________ ROW E054260___________________ ___________________ ROW E054261___________________ ___________ ROW E054886 - ROW E054988___________ ___________ ROW E055066 - ROWE055067____________ ___________ ROW E055070 - ROWE055071____________ ___________________ ROWE055155___________________ ___________ ROW E055156 - ROWE055162____________ ___________________ ROW E056436___________________ ___________________ ROW E056436___________________ ___________ ROW E056442 - ROWE056547____________ ___________ ROWE056565 - ROW E056568____________ ___________________ ROW E056594___________________ ___________________ ROW E056607___________________ ___________________ ROW E056620___________________ ___________ ROW E056646 - ROWE056649____________ ___________ ROW E056650 - ROWE056720____________ ___________ ROW E056721 - ROWE056729____________ ___________________ ROW E056831___________________ ___________________ ROW E057282___________________ ___________________ ROW E057287___________________ ___________________ ROW E057319___________________ ___________________ ROW E057331___________________ ___________________ ROW E057334___________________ ___________________ ROW E057336___________________ ___________ ROW E057506 - ROWE057515____________ ___________________ ROW E057607___________________ ___________________ ROW E057734___________________ ____________________R O W E 0 9 9 6 1 ____________________ ____________________R O W E 5 7 2 9 6 ____________________ RWR0044687 - RWR0044689; EID738796 - EID738798 ______________ RW R004991; EID739100______________ RWR011175 - RWR011178; EID803172 - EID803175 ______________ RW R011355; EID803352______________ _______ SAPPHIRE-002361 - SAPPHIRE-002370________ _______ SAPPHIRE-002371- SAPPHIRE-002374_______ SHK000115 - SHK000117; EID152077 - EID152079 _______________ SL001102;EID 523003_______________ SL001103 - SL1104; EID523004 - EID523005 SL001105 - SL001106; EID523006 - EID523007 SL001107; EID523008 Page 71 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 298 of 326 PAGEID #: 40460 Bates Numbered Documents SMK000294 - SMK000296 EID739253 - EID739255 SMK000297; EID739256 SMK000302 - SMK000305 EID739261 - EID739264 SMK000306; EID739265 SMK000316; EID739275 SMK001047 - SMK001059 EID740005 - EID740017 SMK001047 - SMK001059 EID740005 - EID740017 SMK001047 - SMK001059 EID740005 - EID740017 SMK001073 - SMK001088 EID740031 - EID740046 SMK001089 - SMK001091 EID740047 - EID740049 SMK001105 - SMK001107 EID740063 - EID740065 SMK001110 - SMK001112 EID740068 - EID740070 SMK001243 - SMK001253 EID740201 - EID740211 SMK001297 - SMK001298 EID740255 - EID740256 SMK001312 - SMK001321 EID740270 - EID740279 SMK001405 - SMK001408 EID740363 - EID740366 SMK001421 - SMK001431 EID740379 - EID740389 SMK001649 - SMK001652 EID740607 - EID740610 SMK001653 - SMK001655 EID740611 - EID740613 SMK001658 - SMK001659 EID740616 - EID740617 SMK001750 - SMK001761 EID740708 - EID740719 SMK002035; EID740993 SMK002097; EID741055 SMK002100 - SMK002110 EID741058 - EID741068 SMK002111 - SMK002121 EID741069 - EID741079 SPD01524- SPD01533 SPD01668- SPD01702 SPD01728- SPD01787 SPD01788- SPD01930 SPD01931- SPD02067 SPR000131- SPR000132; EID714048 - EID714049 SPR000227- SPR000231; EID714144 - EID714148 SPR000232- SPR000233; EID714149 - EID714150 SPR000237- SPR000240; EID714154 - EID714157 SRO003442 - SPR003458; EID741175 - EID741191 SRP000039 - SRP000042; EID921943 - EID921946 SRP001764 - SRP001768; EID214975 - EID214979 SRP003425 - SRP003441; EID741158 - EID741174 SRP003498 - SRP003506; EID741231 - EID741239 SRP003538 - SRP003542; EID741271 - EID741275 STB004018- STB004024 STB004025 - STB004068; RJZ000831 - RJZ000871 STB004072- STB004080 STB008756- STB008757; EID741618 - EID741619 Page 72 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 299 of 326 PAGEID #: 40461 Bates Numbered Documents STB008758 - STB008759; EID741620 - EID741621 STB009131 - STB009132; EID741993 - EID741994 STB009286 - STB009288; EID742148 - EID742150 STB009290 - STB009291; EID742152 - EID742153 STB009362 - STB009363; EID742224 - EID742225 STB009589 - STB009604; EID742451 - EID742466 ___________________________T 2 5 6 8 ___________________________T 2 5 7 8 TPM 001824 - TPM 001828; EID742473 - EID742477 TSB002753 -TSB002758; EID742496 - EID742501 UM C000072- UMC000090; EID742732 - EID742750 UMC000091 - UMC000115; EID742751 - EID742775 UM C002338 - UMC002354; EID806662 - ERID806678 USEPA000477 - USEPA000494; EID743698 - EID743715 USEPA10463 - USEPA10485; CF005394 - CF005416 USEPA10508 - USEPA10511; RJZ009222 - RJZ009225 USEPA10517 - USEPA10520; ASH009965 - ASH009968 USEPA14862 - USEPA14910; RLR002204 - RLR002252 USEPA14926 - USEPA14931; CF009524 - CF009529 USEPA14967 - USEPA14968; RJZ009210 - RJZ009211 __________________ USEPA14986; RJZ009207 _________________ USEPA14987; DAW 000638 _________________ USEPA14988; D A W 000627 USEPA14989 - USEPA14993; ASH010159; ASH010156; __________________ASH010161 - ASH010164 __________________USEPA15038; G W 007440 __________________ USEPA15039; AC003618 USEPA15047 - USEPA15050; RLR002788 - RLR002791; 000004 __________________________ 000005 USEPA15047 - USEPA15051; RLR002788 - RLR002792; 000001; __________________________ 000005 __________________USEPA15051; RLR002792 USEPA15098 - USEPA15099; JRW000015 - JRW000016 USEPA15121 - USEPA15122; RLR003573 - RLR003574 USEPA15886 - USEPA15934; RAK004946 - RAK004994 USEPA16061 - USEPA16062; RGS000018 - RGS000019 USEPA16065 - USEPA16072; DDJ000650 - DJJ000657 USEPA7936 - USEPA7951; WAB000005 - W AB000020 USEPA7952 - USEPA7959; RP001967 - RP001974 USEPA8841 - USEPA8842; AJP002394 - AJP002395; EID102984; ASH010015; EID148048 - EID148049; AJP001587; __________________ EID080168 - EID080169 _______________ USEPA8844-45; JRW 000022-23 USEPA8882 - USEPA8883; JRW000020 - JRW000021 Page 73 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 300 of 326 PAGEID #: 40462 Bates Numbered Documents _____________ USEPA8884; JRW 000019_____________ USEPA8885 - USEPA886; JRW000017 - JRW000018 W AB002635 - WAB002641; EID715413 - EID715419 WAB002642 - WAB002648; EID715420 - EID715426 W AB002764 - WAB002767; EID715481 - EID715484; GLK001537 - GLK001563; EID918192 - EID918218 _________W EG M A N 00567 - W EG M A N 00588_________ _____________ YAA000030 - YAA000052_____________ _____________ YAA000389 - YAA000390_____________ YAA000393 - YAA000394 Page 74 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 301 of 326 PAGEID #: 40463 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Book: Stain -Resistant, Nonstick, W aterp ro o f and Lethal: The Hidden Dangers of C-8, authored by Callie Lyons USEPA Complaint filed 7 /8 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ- 2004-0016 DuPont's Answer, filed 8 /1 1 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA- HQ-2004-0016 ________________________ ___________ _____________________ DuPont's M otion for Accelerated Decision on Counts II and III, filed 9 /8 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 USEPA's M em orandum in Support of its Response to DuPont's M otion for Accelerated Decision on Count II, filed 1 0 /8 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 USEPA's M em orandum in Support of its Response to DuPont's M otion for Accelerated Decision on Count III, In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 Affidavit of Oscar Hernandez of USEPA dated 1 0 /6 /0 4 , filed In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA- HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 Affidavit of M ary Beck of USEPA dated 1 0 /8 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004- 0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 USEPA's M otion for Tem porary Stay filed 1 1 /2 2 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004 0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 Order entered 1 1 /2 3 /0 4 Denying USEPA's M otion fo r Stay, Granting Limited Extension of Time fo r USEPA to File Reply in Support of its M otion for Accelerated Decision on Liability fo r Count III, and Amending Prehearing Exchange Schedule, In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 USEPA Complaint filed 1 2 /6 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2005-5001 USEPA's Reply in Support of Accelerated Decision on Count III, filed 1 2 /1 3 /0 4 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016____________________________________________________ Affidavit of David Gray d a te d 1 2 /1 3 /0 4 , filed In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016 and RCRA-HQ-2004-0016____________________________________________________________________________________ USEPA's Post-Argument Brief on Count III, filed In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-20040016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001 USEPA's Post-Argument Briefs on Counts II and III filed on 2 /4 /0 5 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001__________________________________________ USEPA's Initial Prehearing Exchange for Hearing on Count I, filed 2 /1 7 /0 5 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001_____________________________ Order dated 3 /2 9 /0 5 Denying Motions fo r Accelerated Decision on Counts II and III, Order Setting Prehearing Exchange Schedule for Counts II, III, and IV, In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001______________________________________________________________ DuPont's Pre-Hearing Exchange for Hearing on Count I, filed 4 /8 /0 5 In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u P o n t , EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001_____________________________________ US EPA M em orandum dated 1 2 /1 4 /0 5 from Granta Nakayama to Environmental Appeals Board re: DuPont Consent Agreem ent and Proposed Final Order Consent Agreem ent and Final Order filed 1 2 /1 4 /0 5 , In the M a tte r o f E.I. D u Pont, EPA Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001___________________________________________________ Shin, H., Ryan, P., et al., "Modeling the Air-Soil Transport Pathway of Perfluorooctanoic Acid in the Mid-Ohio Valley Using Linked Air Dispersion and Vadose Zone Models", Atmospheric Environment. 51: 67-74 (2012) Shin, H., Viera, V., et al., "Environmental Fate and Transport Modeling fo r Perfluorooctanoic Acid Emitted from the Washington Works Facility in W est Virginia," Environ. Sci. & Technol. 45, 1435-1442 (2011) Expert report of Shane Snyder dated 2 /1 5 /1 3 in Little Hocking v. DuPont case Page 75 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 302 of 326 PAGEID #: 40464 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers DuPont Expert Witness Disclosure of Harold M . McNair, in the Leach v. D u P o n t case DuPont Expert Witness Disclosure of Andrew Hartten in Leach v. D u P o n t case DuPont's Responses to Plfs.' First Set of Interrogatories in Leach v. DuPont case, Feb. 2002 Letter from Robert A. Bilott to Paula Durst Gillis, Esq. Re: W ilbur E. Tennant, et al. v DuPont, re: C-8, 8 /1 5 /2 0 0 0 Letter from Lubeck Public Service District, James Cox M anager to PSD Customers re: C-8, 1 0 /3 1 /2 0 0 0 DuPont calendar entry appointm ent, "Expect call from George Senkler re: C8 u p d a te ", 1 0 /0 8 /2 0 0 1 Bernard Reilly email to Bern re: drinking w ater results, 1 0 /2 0 /2 0 0 1 The Little Hocking W ater Association news release re C-8, 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 2 DuPont Calendar Entry Appointm ent ",Expecting a call from George Senkler re: C8", 2 /2 6 /2 0 0 2 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp, to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 3 /2 0 /2 0 0 2 WVDEP email from Dave Watkins to Allyn Turner, Dee Ann Staats re: EPA Lab o rato ry,5/6/2002 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 5 /1 3 /2 0 0 2 DuPont Email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications R e p o rt, 5 /1 6 /2 0 0 2 DuPont email from Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 0 /9 /2 0 0 2 DuPont email from Irv Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 0 /1 1 /2 0 0 2 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 0 /2 8 /2 0 0 2 Pages from transcript of George H. Senkler in Leach v. DuPont case, 1 1 /2 1 /2 0 0 2 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al. re Daily Communications Report, 1 2 /2 0 /2 0 0 2 DuPont email from Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al. re: W eekend Report F e b .1 6 ,2 /1 6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O. Holliday, et al., Re: Daily Communications Report, 2 /2 6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 2 /1 6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al. re: Daily Communications Report, 3 /1 7 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 3 /2 8 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Stories on C8 Picked up across US, 3 /3 0 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 4 /2 /2 0 0 3 April 2003 DuPont inform ation re: USEPA released a preliminary risk assessment for C-8 ; also DuPont Calendar entry "Call from George Senkler re C8", 4 /3 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Scott F. Nelson to Chad Holliday, et al. re: Daily Communications Report, 4 /4 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Scott F. Nelson to Chad Holliday, et al., re: W eekend Communications Report, 4 /5 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications R ep o rt,, 4 /7 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., re Daily Communications Report, 4 /8 /2 0 0 3 Letter to Christine Todd W hitm an of USEPA from EWG re: DuPont's failure to submit key health studies under the requirements of TSCA 8e, 15 U.S.C 2607, 4 /1 1 /2 0 0 3 EWG website pages: PFCs Global Contaminants - DuPont's Spin About PFOA, undated DuPont email from Chad Holliday to Richard J. Angiullo, re:Daily Communications Report, 4 /1 1 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., Re: W eekend Communications Report, 4 /1 2 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R. Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., Re: Daily Communications Report, 4 /1 6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont Calendar Entry appointm ent: " George Senkler will call (C8), 4 /2 2 /2 0 0 3 Letter from "A Concerned Citizen" to Christine T. W hitm an EPA Adm inistrator re DuPont, 4 /2 2 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Chad Holliday to Nandakumar Rao re: Daily Communications Report, 4 /2 8 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Chad Holliday to Lois Juliber re: Contact w ith Gore, 4 /2 9 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 4 /3 0 /2 0 0 3 Order Granting Plaintiff's Second M otion fo r Sanctions Against DuPont, in Leach v. DuPont case, 5 /1 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R. Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al. Re: Daily Communications Report , 5 /8 /2 0 0 3 Page 76 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 303 of 326 PAGEID #: 40465 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers DuPont email from Chad O. Holliday to Thomas M . Connelly, DuPont re W eekend Communications Report, 5 /1 1 /2 0 0 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont email from Alexa L Girardi to Donna Saunders forwarding Daily Communications Report, 5 /1 3 /2 0 0 3 A R 2 2 6 -1 3 1 8 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont email from Chad O. Holliday to Louise B. Lancaster re Agenda fo r Board M eeting , 5 /2 6 /2 0 0 3 From USEPA Dockets website: Document #O PPT-2003-0012-0124, dated 6 /2 0 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al. re; W eekend Communications Report, 6 /2 1 /2 0 0 3 Latham & W atkins presentation slides: "Chemicals in the Body," dated 6 /2 4 /0 3 (68 pages) DuPont email from Anthony Farina to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 6 /2 5 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O.Holliday, et al.,Re: Daily Communications R e p o rt, 7 /7 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R, Farina to Chad O.Holliday, et al.,Re: Daily Communications R e p o rt7/9/200 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O. Holliday, et al. re: Daily Communications R e p o rt, 7 /1 0 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al. Re: News Journal Coverage of CPSC, 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O.Holliday, et al.Re: Daily Communications Report, 7 /2 8 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O.Holliday, et al.,re: Daily Communications Report, 7 /2 9 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 8 /6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 8 /1 8 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R. Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., re; Daily Communications Report, 8 /2 2 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R. Clifton W ebb to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: W eekend R e p o rt, 8 /2 3 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 9 /2 3 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G. Irwin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communication Report, 9 /3 0 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communication Report, 1 0 /2 4 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G. Irwin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., Re: Daily Communications R e p o rt, 1 0 /2 8 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Catherine L. Andriadis to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 0 /3 1 /2 0 0 3 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont email from Chad O. Holliday to Lois Juliber forwarding Communication R e p o rt, 1 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 3 Email from Louise B. Lancaster of DuPont to Alain Belda of Alcoa, et al., re DuPont's to Statem ent on ABC's 2 0 /2 0 Segment, 1 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 3 _______________________________________________________________________________ DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re W eekend Communications Report, 1 1 /1 6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R Clifton W ebb to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 1 /2 2 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from R Clifton W ebb to Chad O. Holliday, et al., Re: W eekend Report- Novem ber 23, 1 1 /2 3 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irwin Lipp to Chad O Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 1 /2 4 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from G Irvin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al., Re: Daily Communications Report, 1 1 /2 6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont Email from Kathleen H. Forte to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Possible Questions and Topics for Community Leaders M eetin g ,12/2/2003 DuPont email from Scott Nelson to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 2 /5 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Scott F. Nelson to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: W eekend Communications Report, 1 2 /6 /2 0 0 3 DuPont email from Chad O Holliday to W Donald Johnson, forwarding Communications Report, 1 /3 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from Lori A. Captain to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 /6 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from Chad O. Holliday to Francine C. Shaw, re: 2003 Yr In Review, 1 /1 0 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from Catherine L. Andriadis to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 1 /1 6 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from G. Irwin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communication Report, 2 /1 1 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from G Irwin Lipp to Chad O. Holliday, et al., Re: Daily Communications Report, 2 /1 4 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from Chad Holiday to Scot Holliday, et al., forwarding Daily Communications Report, 2 /1 2 /2 0 0 4 Page 77 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 304 of 326 PAGEID #: 40466 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers DuPont email from Anthony R. Farina to Chad O. Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 2 /2 7 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from G. Irvin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 3 /3 /2 0 0 4 DuPont email from G. Irvin Lipp to Chad Holliday, et al., re: Daily Communications Report, 3 /4 /2 0 0 4 Bullet-point list dated 3 /1 5 -3 /1 6 /0 5 titled: Global Regulatory M eeting (6 pages) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). Email dated 2 /2 2 /2 0 0 6 from David W egm an to Tom Beauchamp re: questions for ERB re th e Community Study (5 pages) (from Ellen Eisen's third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont email dated 5 /1 /0 6 from Susan Silencer to Robert Rickard, et al., re: Core Team M eeting (1 page) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont email dated 5 /2 3 /0 6 from Susan Stalnecker to Robert Rickard, et al., re: Core Team M eeting (1 page) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont email dated 6 /1 3 /0 6 from Susan Stalnecker to Robert Rickard, et al., re: Core Team M eeting (1 page) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont email dated 7 /1 0 /0 6 from Susan Stalnecker to Robert Rickard, et al., re: Core Team M eeting Agenda (1 page) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont email dated 7 /1 8 /0 6 from Susan Stalnecker to Susan Stalnecker, w ith numerous copyholders, re: Agenda (3 pages) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont email dated 8 /1 1 /0 6 from Susan Stalnecker to Robert Rickard, et al., re: John Hopkins Update (1 page) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). Email dated 1 1 /9 /0 6 from Michael McCabe to David Boothe, et al., re: Dalton Study (1 page) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont undated PowerPoint slides titled: Global Regulatory Strategy. (4 pages) (from McCabe & Associates' third-party production in Rowe/Rhodes cases). DuPont slides: "Clean Hardball", 9 /2 0 /2 0 0 7 9 /1 7 /2 0 0 9 USEPA Consent Agreem ent and Final Order 3 /6 /2 0 0 1 Bilott letter to USEPA re request for im m ediate governmental action 1 2 /6 /2 0 0 4 USEPA Complaint re DuPont United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, Complaint, Earl Edgar Frum v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, 2 /7 /2 0 1 3 7 /8 /2 0 0 4 USEPA Complaint re DuPont Hongxiang Teng: "Overview of the Developm ent of the Fluoropolymer Industry", Appl. Sci. 2012, 2, 496-512; doi: 10.3390, 5 /2 9 /2 0 1 2 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Paul D. Thacker: "The W einberg Proposal", Environmental Science & Technology, 0 5 /0 1 /2 0 0 6 ; and AR226-1693 04/2 9 /2 0 0 3 Correspondence Richard W . Clapp, et al: "Environmental and Health: Vital Intersection or Contested Territory?", American Journal of Law and Medicine; 2004, 30, 2/3 ; Health M odule David Michaels, PhD, MPH, et al: "Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and th e Protection of the Public's Health and Environment", American Journal of Public Health, Supplement 1, Vol. 95, No. S1, 2005 James Huff, PhD: "Industry Influence on Occupational and Environmental Public Health", INT J Occup Environ Health, Vol. 12 /N o 1, JA N /M ar 2007_________________________________________________________________________ Roni A. Neff, ScM, et al: "Regulatory Parallels to Daubert: Stakeholder Influence, "Sound Science," and the Delayed Adoption of Health-Protective Standards", American Journal of Public Health, Supplement 1, Vol. 95, No. S1, 2005____________________________________________________________________________________________________ David Michaels: "Doubt Is Their Product"; Scientific American, Inc.; June 2005 Page 78 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 305 of 326 PAGEID #: 40467 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers David Michaels: "Doubt How Industry's Assault on Science is Their Threatens Your Health Product", Oxford University Press 2008 Kyle Steenland, et al: "Commentary: Class Action Lawsuits: Can They Advance Epidemiologic Research?", Epidemiology, Volum e 25, Issue 2 - p 167-169, doi: 10.1097/E D E .0000000000000067, 3 /2 0 1 4 __________________ Rena Steinzor, et al: "Cozying Up: How the Manufacturers of Toxic Chemicals Seek to Co-opt Their Regulators", Center fo r Progressive Reform, W h ite Paper #1211, Septem ber 2012 W VU report - Kevin M . Leyden, PhD., et al: "Chronicle of th e C8 Health Project" DuPont PowerPoint slides: "Install Potable W ater Carbon Filter Unit PG&S/Washington W o rk s ", 2 /2 /2 0 0 6 7 /2 8 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Elisabeth M. Morse of Steptoe to R. Edison Hill regarding Residential GAC System Sampling, Enclosing Analytical Results of recent Quarterly Sampling for APFO and PFOA 9 /8 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Elisabeth M . Morse of Steptoe to R. Edison Hill regarding Residential GAC System Sampling, Enclosing Analytical Results of Recent Sampling for APFO and PFOA 1 0 /1 9 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Elisabeth M . Morse of Steptoe to R. Edison Hill regarding Residential GAC System Sampling, Enclosing Analytical Results of Recent Sampling for APFO and PFOA Pamela Brust: "Last Three W ater Filtration Plants Moving Along, C8 Health Project Results Could be Released Soon", News Article from The Parkersburg News, 2 /2 1 /2 0 0 7 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 9 DuPont News Release, "DuPont Installs Final Two W ater Filtration Systems, All Filtration Systems Are Operating as Designed" 3 /3 0 /2 0 0 9 Letter from Andrew S. Hartten of DuPont to Robert Griffin, Little Hocking W a te r Association, regarding APFO and PFOA Analytical Results - Granulated Activated Carbon Treatm ent System, February 2009 Biweekly Sampling Event #2, and transm itting results DuPont PowerPoint slides by Andrew S. Hartten: "W ater Treatm ent fo r PFOA and PFOS", 1 0 /1 6 /2 0 0 9 2 /7 /2 0 0 7 Summary of Testing of Consumer W a te r Filters Containing GAC for PFBA Removal from Ronald Thompson of Minnesota Departm ent of Health 2 /8 /2 0 0 7 Minnesota D epartm ent of Health Email from James Kelly to Daniel Wilson regarding Summary of Residential GAC Filter Testing From filterw aterinfo.com website: Filter W ater Info, Home W ater Filtration System Information Sheet, Undated Minnesota Departm ent of Health Fact Sheet "M DH Evaluation of Point-of-Use W a te r Treatm ent Devices for Perfluorochemical Removal interim Report", 1/2008 Minnesota Departm ent of Health PowerPoint slides: "Overview of Residential Reverse Osmosis and Adsorption Technologies Included in PFC Study and Current Findings (M arch 2008)", 3 /2 0 0 8 Philip C. Olsen, et al. of W ater Science & M arketing LLC, report prepared for Minnesota Departm ent of Health: : "Performance Evaluation, Removal of Perfluorochemicals (PFC's) w ith Point-of-Use (POU) W ater Treatm ent Devices" Final Report, 5 /1 /2 0 0 8 From The W ater Quality Association website: abstract of article: "Ground-Breaking Study of POU-Device Removal of PFCs". 7 /2 5 /2 0 0 8 _______________________________________________________________________________ Scott M . Bartell, et al: "Rate of Decline in Serum PFOA Concentrations A fter Granular Activated Carbon Filtration at Two Public W a te r Systems in Ohio and W est Virginia", Environmental Health Perspectives Manuscript, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .0901252, 1 0 /2 2 /2 0 0 9 _________________________________________________________________________ Document from Minnesota D epartm ent of Health website:" Home W ater Treatm ent Units: Point-Of-Use Devices" and abstract of article by Y.T. Tsai, et al: "Treatm ent of Perluorinated Chemicals by Electro M icrofiltration", Environmental Science & Technology, 9 /2 7 /2 0 1 0 Minnesota Departm ent of Health News Release, "M DH Warns Consumers of Deceptive Sales of W ater Treatm ent Systems, Tactics Use Bogus Tests, M isrepresent Agencies and Standards", 1 0 /1 2 /2 0 1 0 Page 79 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 306 of 326 PAGEID #: 40468 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers J. Thompson, et al: "Removal of PFOS, PFOA and O ther Perfluoroalkyl Acids at W a te r Reclamation Plants in South East Queensland Australia", Chemosphere Abstract, 1 1 /2 /2 0 1 0 S. Deng, et al: "Removal of Perfluorooctanoate from Surface W ater by Polyaluminium Chloride Coagulation", W ater Res Abstract, 1 1 /3 0 /2 0 1 0 Yan Qu, et al: "Adsorption Mechanism of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate on Granular Activated Carbon in W astew ater", Abstract from Chinese journal, Undated M .H. Cao, et al: "[Photo-Chemical Decomposition of Perfluorooctanoic Acids in Aqueous Periodate]", Haun Jing Ke Xue Abstract, 1 /2 0 1 1 S. Horikoshi, et al: "A Novel Liquid Plasma AOP Device Integrating Microwaves and Ultrasounds and Its Evaluation in Defluorinating Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Aqueous M edia", Ultrason Sonochem Abstract, 1 /1 9 /2 0 1 1 W ater Quality Association, 2 /8 /2 0 1 1 : Minnesota Departm ent of Health Perfluorochemical (PFC) Study: Products evaluated by W Q A for reduction of PFCs Q. Zhuo, et al: "Efficient Electrochemical Oxidation of Perfluorooctanoate Using a Ti/SnO(2)-Sb-Bi Anode", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 3 /1 /2 0 1 1 D. Zhao, et al: "Sorption of Perfluorochemicals to Granular Activated Carbon in the Presence of Ultrasound", J Phys Chem Abstract, 3 /3 /2 0 1 1 S. Takagi, et al: "Fate of Perfluorooctanesulfonate and Perfluorooctanoate in Drinking W ater Treatm ent Processes", W a te r Res Abstract, 5 /1 3 /2 0 1 1 Christian Eschauzier, et al: "Impact of Treatm ent Processes on the Removal of Perfluoroalkyl Acids from the Drinking W a te r Production Chain", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 1 2 /2 2 /2 0 1 1 J. Yu, et al: "Effect of Effluent Organic M a tte r on the Adsorption of Perfluorinated Compounds onto Activated Carbon", J Hazard M ater Abstract, 5 /6 /2 0 1 2 F. Xiao, et al: "Mechanisms for Removal of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) from Drinking W a te r by Conventional and Enhanced Coagulation", W a te r Res Abstract, doi: 1 0.101 6/j.w atres.2012.0 9.024, 9 /2 4 /2 0 1 2 ____________________________________________________________________ PowerPoint presentation for NORDROCS 2012 meeting: Niklas Torneman: "Remedial M ethods and Strategies for Perflourinated Compounds", 9 /1 8 /2 0 1 2 Feng Xiao, et al: "PFOS and PFOA Removal by Coagulation....", The Drinking W ater Advisor W ebsite: Abstract, 1 /9 /2 0 1 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ C. Flores, et al: "Occurrence of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in N.E. Spanish Surface W aters and Their Removal in a Drinking W ater Treatm ent Plant th at Combines Conventional and Advanced Treatm ents in Parallel Lines", Sci Total Environ Abstract, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.026, 6 /1 0 /2 0 1 3 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gunilla Lindstrom, et al: "The 1st W orldw ide Interlaboratory Study on Perfluorinated Compounds in Environmental and Human Samples", Abstract for conference presentation, Undated Krista Christensen, et al: "M ethod to Assess M ultiple Classes of Environmental Chemicals and Liver Disease: NHANES 2003-2006, ISEE Abstract, Undated__________________________________________________________________ 1 1 /2 4 /1 9 8 0 summary: Results of Blood Analyses authored by Y.L. Power, M.D. A R 2 2 6 -0 0 2 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Lisa Clemen, et al: "Analysis of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate or O ther Fluorochemicals in Serum Extracts Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry", 3M Environmental Laboratory, 4 /2 6 /1 9 9 9 Lisa Clemen, et al: "Extraction of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate or O ther Fluorochemicals Compounds from Serum For Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry", 3M Environmental Laboratory, 4 /2 6 /1 9 9 9 Page 80 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 307 of 326 PAGEID #: 40469 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers David L. Vollm er of Northwest Bioanalytical: report prepared for 3M : "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, N-MeFOSE-OH, N-EtFOSE-OH, POAA and PFHS in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Assay Validation Report, 5 /1 3 /1 9 9 9 __________________________________________________________________________________________ David L. Vollm er of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared for 3M : "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, N-MeFOSE-OH, N-EtFOSE-OH, POAA and PFHS in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Sample Analysis Report for Protocol, 1 2 /8 /1 9 9 9 David L. Vollm er of Northwest Biolanalytical: Report prepared for 3M : "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, N-MeFOSE-OH, N-EtFOSE-OH, POAA and PFHS in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Sample Analysis Report for Protocol, 1 2 /8 /1 9 9 9 Connie O. Sakashita of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared fo r 3M .: "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, N-MeFOSE-OH, N-EtFOSE-OH, POAA and PFHS in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Assay Revalidation Report, 1 /2 4 /2 0 0 1 Connie O. Sakashit of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared for 3M .: "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS and Related Compounds in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Sample Analysis Report for Protocol, 1 1 /2 0 /2 0 0 1 Connie O. Sakashita of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared fo r 3M : "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS, PFOSA, PFOSAA, POAA, PFHS, M 556 and M 570 in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Assay Revalidation Addendum Report, 1 1 /2 0 /2 0 0 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Connie O. Sakashita, of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared for 3M .: "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS and Related Compounds in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S", Sample Analysis Report for Protocol, 1 1 /3 0 /2 0 0 1 Kristen J. Hansen, et al: "Compound-Specific, Q uantitative Characterization of Organic Fluorochemicals in Biological Matrices", Environmental Science & Technology Article, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1 /1 2 /2 0 0 1 Connie O. Sakashita of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared fo r 3M .: "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS and Related Compounds in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S, Sample Analysis Report fo r Protocol", 1 /9 /2 0 0 2 Connie O. Sakashita, of Northwest Bioanalytical: Report prepared for 3M .: "Quantitative Determ ination of PFOS and Related Compounds in Human Serum by LC/M S/M S, Sample Analysis Report fo r Protocol", 1 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 Emily R. Decker, et al of Exygen: Report prepared for 3M : "Analysis of Pooled Human Sera and Plasma and M onkey Sera for Fluorocarbons Using Exygen M ethod ExM -023-071", Study, 1 0 /3 0 /2 0 0 2 A R 2 2 6 -1 2 1 5 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Lori Coward, et al: Report prepared for 3M : "Determ ination of Perfluorooctanecarboxalate in M onkey Serum and Urine: Sample Preparation and Analysis by HPLC Mass Spectrom etry/M ass Spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS), Report, 4 /7 /2 0 0 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Emily R. Decker, et al. of Exygen: Report prepared fo r 3M : "Extraction of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate from Red Blood Cells and Scrum fo r Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry", Study, 6 /2 /2 0 0 3 "Collection and Handling of Samples fo r Analysis of PFOA, PFOS and O ther Fluorinated Compounds", Summary, Undated 1 /2 3 /2 0 0 4 Email from Patricia Haneman of NMS Laboratories to Bilott regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid Anna Karrman, et al: "Developm ent of a M ethod fo r th e Analysis of Perfluoroalkylated Compounds in W hole Blood", Organohalogen Compounds, Vol. 66, 2004 G. Lindstrom, et al: Accuracy and Precision in th e Determ ination of Perfluorinated Chemicals in Human Blood Verified by Interlaboratory Comparisons", Article, J. Chromatogr. A ., 1216(3): 394-400, 1 /1 6 /2 0 0 9 J.C. D'eon, et al: "Determining the M odecular Interactions of Perfluorinated Carboxylic Acids with Human Sera and Isolated Human Serum Albumin Using nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy", Environ Toxicol Chem Abstract, 8/2010 Page 81 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 308 of 326 PAGEID #: 40470 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers G.W. Lein, et al: "Analysis of Perfluorinated Chemicals in Umbilical Cord Blood by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chrom atography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry", J Chromatogr B Techno Biomed Life Sci Abstract, 2 /2 2 /2 0 1 1 M. Llorca, et al: "Analysis of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Cord Blood by Turbulent Flow Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry", Abstract, Sci Total Environ 433C: 1 5 1 -1 6 0 ,, 7 /9 /2 0 1 2 W . Ma, et al: "Analysis of Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Bisphenol A in Dried Blood Spots by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry", Anal Bioanal Chem Abstract, 2 /1 4 /2 0 1 3 National Medical Services Specimen Collection Final Report fo r PFOA, Control #699763, 5 /3 0 /2 0 0 1 Leach v. DuPont et al Defendant's Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, 2 /1 5 /2 0 0 2 8 /2 7 /2 0 0 4 Fax Letter from Jennifer Quinn-Barabanov to Bilott regarding Exygen Analytical Report, EID871401E ID 8 7 1 4 1 0 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 8 8 4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -0 0 2 0 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -0 0 3 6 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 /2 1 /1 9 9 9 3 M Laboratory Report, Analysis of FCs in Samples of Children's Sera A R 2 2 6 -0 0 1 9 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 /2 8 /2 0 0 0 3 M Laboratory Composite Report, Analytical Reports of Data fo r Fluorochemical Analysis in Human Sera A R 2 2 6 -0 6 4 6 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 0 1 9 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 0 2 7 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 /2 5 /2 0 0 1 3 M Final Report, Identification of Fluorochemicals in Human Tissue 6 /2 5 /2 0 0 1 3 M Interim Report, Identification of Fluorochemicals in Sera of Children in th e United States 6 /2 5 /2 0 0 1 3 M Interim Report, Identification of Fluorochemicals in Sera of American Red Cross Adult Blood Donors A R 2 2 6 -1 0 8 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 0 8 4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 0 8 5 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 0 8 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 1 5 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 1 5 0 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 1 4 8 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 1 5 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 8 6 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 8 8 4 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 8 9 9 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 /2 8 /2 0 0 6 Letter from A. Michael Kaplan of DuPont to USEPA regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Updated Occupational Blood M onitoring Information 8 /1 0 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Andrea V. Malinowski of DuPont to USEPA regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Preliminary Partial Non-Occupational Blood Data 8 /1 5 /2 0 0 8 Letter from A. Michael Kaplan of DuPont to USEPA regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Updated Occupational Serum Sampling Washington Works, Parkersburg, WV, 8EHQ-06.16446 8 /4 /2 0 0 9 DuPont Company, Washington Works, Parkersburg, W V, Table: Serum PFOA Results - Other Group 8 /2 0 /2 0 1 2 Letter from S. Satheesh Anard to USEPA regarding Correction to June 7, 2012 Submission, 8EHQ-0817229 Page 82 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 309 of 326 PAGEID #: 40471 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Kouji Harada, et al: "Renal Clearance of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Perfluorooctanoate in Humans and Their Species-Specific Excretion", Environmental Research Abstract, doi: 10.1016/j.en vres.2004.12.003, 1 2 /2 0 0 4 2 /1 /2 0 0 5 Letter from Peter D. Robertson to Charles M . Auer, USEPA, regarding Further DuPont Voluntary Response to EPA's Novem ber 4, 2004, Request Submission to AR-226 and TSCA 8(e) Office Supplemental to December 20, 2004 Submission Geary Olsen, et al. of 3M : Comments of 3 M Company to the EPA Science Advisory Board PFOA Review Panel, 2 /1 0 /2 0 0 5 Geary Olsen, DVM , PhD: "Presentation to EPA SAB-Draft PFOA Risk Assessment", Slides, 2 /2 2 /2 0 0 5 2 /1 8 /2 0 0 5 Email from James Kelly of Minnesota Dept. of Health to G. Hohenstein and M . Santoro of 3 M regarding Request for Information - Blood Testing fo r Perfluorochemicals 2 /2 2 /2 0 0 5 Email from James Kelly of Minnesota Dept. of Health to L. Zobel, 3 M , regarding Blood Testing for PFCs 2 /2 2 /2 0 0 5 Email from L. Zobel of 3M to James Kelly of Minnesota Dept. of Health regarding Blood Testing for PFCs Axys Analytical Services Ltd Perfluorinated Surfactant Analysis Report - results from March-August 2005 and JulySept. 2006 3 /2 3 /2 0 0 5 Email from Bob Griffin of Little Hocking W ater Assoc. to James Kelly of Minnesota Dept. of Health regarding Story on CNN About C8 5 /1 2 /2 0 0 5 Letter from Bilott to USEPA, Charles M. Auer, M ary Ellen W eber, M ary Dominiak, Jennifer Seed, James Kelly regarding Perfluorochemical Residential Exposure Data for Washington County, Minnesota 5 /1 8 /2 0 0 5 Email from James Kelly of Minnesota Dept. of Health to representatives of local M N governm ent officials regarding PFC Information G.W. Olsen, et al: "Historical Comparison of Perfluorooctanesulfonate, Perfluorooctanoate, and Other Fluorochemicals in Human Blood, Environmental Health Perspective Abstract, 113(5): 539-45, 5 /2 0 0 5 D. Ehresman, et al of 3M : "Evaluation of the Half-Life (T%) of Elimination of Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) from Human Serum", Poster for Presentation, Undated "Body Burden - The Pollution in Newborns - A Benchmark Investigation of Industrial Chemicals, Pollutants and Pesticides in Umbilical Cord Blood", Environmental W orking Group, 7 /1 4 /2 0 0 5 "Body Burden - The Pollution in Newborns - A Benchmark Investigation of Industrial Chemicals, Pollutants and Pesticides in Umbilical Cord Blood", Environmental W orking Group, 7 /1 4 /2 0 0 5 University of Pennsylvania news release: "Penn Study Finds Significantly Elevated C8 Levels Among Studied Population Group in Southeastern Ohio, W ater is Identified as th e M ajor Source of Contamination", 2005 University of Pennsylvania: Summary of Community C8 Study, W arren High School Auditorium, August 15, 2005 AR226-3564 AR226-3575 Edward A. Em m ett, MD: "Community Exposure to Perfluorooctanoate: Relationships Between Serum Concentrations and Exposure Sources, Manuscript Draft, #JOEM-06-050RI, Undated AR226-3665 Kouji Harada, et al: "Historical and Geographical Aspects of the Increasing Perfluorooctanoate and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Contamination in Human Serum in Japan", Chemosphere Article, doi: 10.1016/j.chemospher.2006.05.010, 2006 W arren G. Foster, et al: "Serum Levels of Perfluorinated Compounds in Human M aternal and Umbilical Cord Blood Samples", Abstracts fo r presentations: Making Sense of Human Biomonitoring Data - An International Workshop on Interpreting Biomonitoring Data, held at The Depot in M in n eap o lis,7/26/2 006 Page 83 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 310 of 326 PAGEID #: 40472 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers 8 /2 /2 0 0 5 Letter from Bilott to USEPA Auer, Seed, Dominiak and W eb er regarding Perfluorochemical Residential Exposure Data for Ohio 8 /1 0 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Andrea V. Malinowski of DuPont to USEPA regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Preliminary Partial Non-Occupational Blood Data 1 1 /2 9 /2 0 0 6 Letter from J. Michael Joyce of Ahlstrom to USEPA regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), FYI Submittal 2 /1 3 /2 0 0 7 Letter from Andrea V. Malinowski of DuPont to USEPA regarding C5-C12 Perfluoroacid Sulfonate and Perfluorooctanoic Acid - Results from Plaintiffs' Counsel Antonio M. Calafat, et al: "Serum Concentrations of 11 Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in the U.S. Population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.102 1/es062686 m , 3 /6 /2 0 0 7 3 /2 9 /2 0 0 7 Letter from J. Michael Joyce of Ahlstrom to USEPA regarding Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) FYI Submittal re employee blood testing 4 /1 6 /2 0 0 7 Letter from Bilott to USEPA Charles Auer, M ary Dominiak, Jennifer Seed and Gloria Post regarding Perfluorochemcial Blood Exposure Data fo r New Jersey Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health news release re study: "PFOA and PFOS Detected in Newborns", 4 /2 4 /2 0 0 7 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Benjamin J. Apelberg, et al: "Determinants of Fetal Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in Baltimore, Maryland", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.102 1/es070091 1, 4 /2 0 /2 0 0 7 G.W. Olsen, et al: "Preliminary Evidence of a Decline in Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) Concentrations in American Red Cross Blood Donors", Chemosphere Abstract, 68(1): 105-111, 5 /2 0 0 7 1 2 /1 1 /2 0 0 7 Letter from M . Alfred W iedow of Ciba to USEPA regarding Results from Human Biomonitoring Survey of Perfluorooctanic Acid (PFOA) Antonio M. Calafat, et al: "Serum Concentrations of 11 Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in the U.S. Population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.102 1/es062686 m , 3 /6 /2 0 0 7 Hermann Fromme, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds - Exposure Assessment fo r th e General Population in W estern Countries", Article, Ind. J. Environ. Health 212, 239-270 (2009), doi: 10.101 6/j.ijh eh .2008.04.00 7, 4 /7 /2 0 0 8 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 /9 /2 0 0 8 Letter from Bilott to USEPA Charles M. Auer, Cathy Fehrenbacher, Toni Krasnic, Jennifer Seed and Lara W ern er regarding PFOA/C8 Blood Levels from O hio/W est Virginia Drinking W ater Contamination: For AR226/OPPT-2003-0012/TSCA 8(e)/IRIS_____________________________________________________________________ Rocio M onroy, et al: "Serum Levels of Perfluoroalkyl Compounds in Human M aternal and Umbilical Cord Blood Samples", Environmental Research Article, doi: 10.1016/j.en vres.2008.06.001, 2008 Leo W.Y. Yeung, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds and Total and Extractable Organic Fluorine in Human Blood Samples from China", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.102 1/es800631 n, 1 0 /1 /2 0 0 8 Siobhan McNally, MD: "PFCs in Children's Blood: The Inside Dirt", AAP Grand Rounds, 1 1 /2 0 0 9 Hermann Fromme, et al: "Pre- and Postnatal Exposure to Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs)", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 8 /1 9 /2 0 1 0 Ryan Seals, et al: "Accumulation and Clearance of PFOA in Current and Former Residents of an Exposed Community", Environmental Health Perspectives Abstract doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1002346, 9 /2 2 /2 0 1 0 Tamon Niisoe, et al: "Long-Term Simulation of Human Exposure to Atmospheric Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFO) in th e Osaka Urban Area, Japan", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 9 /2 2 /2 0 1 0 Page 84 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 311 of 326 PAGEID #: 40473 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers H. Nilsson, et al: "Inhalation Exposure to Fluorotelom er Alcohols Yield Perfluorocarboxylates in Human Blood?", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 44(19): 7717-22, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 0 Kirsten T. Eriksen, et al: "Determinants of Plasma PFOA and PFOS Levels Among 652 Danish Men", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 1 0 /1 2 /2 0 1 0 Renate Sturm, et al: "Trends of Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in M arine Biota and in Humans", Environmental Chemistry Abstract, 10/1 2 /2 0 1 0 Jai Baoi, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds in th e Environment and the Blood of Residents Living near Fluorochemical Plants in Fuxin, China", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 1 0 /2 1 /2 0 1 0 M atteo Salvalaglio, et al: "Determ ination of Energies and Sites of Binding of PFOA and PFOS to Human Serum Albumin", The Journal of Physical Chemistry Abstract, 1 0 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 M atteo Salvalaglio, et al: "Determ ination of Energies and Sites of Binding of PFOA and PFOS to Human Serum Albumin", The Journal of Physical Chemistry Abstract, 1 0 /2 8 /2 0 1 0 Y. Pan, et al: "Concentrations of Perfluorinated Compounds in Human Blood from Twelve Cities in China", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 9 /1 /2 0 1 0 H. Nilsson, et al: "Inhalation Exposure to Fluorotelom er Alcohols Yield Perfluorocarboxylates in Human Blood?", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 0 H. Nilsson, et al: "Inhalation Exposure to Fluorotelom er Alcohols Yield Perfluorocarboxylates in Human Blood?", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 0 Baard Ingegerdsson Freberg, et al: "Occupational Exposure to Airborne Perfluorinated Compounds During Professional Ski Waxing", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 9 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 Jurgen Holzer, et al: "Follow-Up of Residents Exposed to Perfluorooctanoic Acid-Contaminated Drinking W ater in Germany", Epidemiology Abstract, Vol. 22, Issue 1, doi: 10.1 0 9 7 /0 1 .e d e .0 0 0 0 3 9 1 9 7 9 .9 5 3 1 6 .f2 , 1 /2 0 1 1 Tracey J. W oodruff, et al: "Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant W om en in the US: NHANES 2003-2004", Environmental Health Perspective Abstract, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1002727, 1 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 Tracey J. W oodruff, et al: "Environmental Chemicals in Pregnant W om en in the US: NHANES 2003-2004", Environmental Health Perspective Abstract, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1002727, 1 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 S.J. Harrad: "Exploiting Chirality to Further Understanding of th e Contribution of Precursor Compounds to Human Body Burdens of Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)", FindAPhD.com Article, 1 /1 2 /2 0 1 1 C. Jin, et al: "Perfluoroalkyl Acids Including Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Perfluorohexane Sulfonate in Firefighters", Journal of Occup Env M edicine Abstract, 2 /2 1 /2 0 1 1 Peter P. Egeghy, et al: "An Assessment of th e Exposure of Americans to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate: A Comparison of Estimated intake w ith Values Inferred from NHANES Data", Journal of Exposure Science and Enviromental Epidemiology Abstract, doi: 10.103 8/jes.2009.73 , 3 /2 0 1 1 C. Jin, et al: "Perfluoroalkyl Acids including Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Perfluorohexane Sulfonate in Firefighters", Journal of Occup Env M edicine Abstract, 53(3): 324-8, 3 /2 0 1 1 P. Qin, et al: "Perfluorodecanoic Acid Binding to Hemoproteins: New Insights from Spectroscopic Studies", J Agric Food Chem Abstract, 3 /1 0 /2 0 1 1 Kayoko Kato, et al: "Trends in Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the U.S. Population: 1999-2008", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.102 1/es104361 3, 4 /6 /2 0 1 1 Kayoko Kato, et al: "Trends in Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the U.S. Population: 1999-2008", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.102 1/es104361 3, 4 /6 /2 0 1 1 Kayoko Kato, et al: "Trends in Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the U.S. Population: 1999-2008", Article manuscript, Undated Page 85 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 312 of 326 PAGEID #: 40474 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Kouji H. Harada, et al: "Odd-Numbered Perfluorocarboxylates Predominate Over Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Serum Samples from Japan, Korea and Vietnam " Environmental International Abstract, doi: 1 0 .101 6/j.en vin t.2011.04.0 11, 5 /1 9 /2 0 1 1 ____________________________________________________________________ Geary W . Olsen, et al: "Analysis of a Homologous Series of Perfluorocarboxylates from American Red Cross Adult Blood Donors, 2000-20 01 and 2006", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.1021/es1043535, 3 /2 0 1 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Kouji H. Harada, et al: "Odd-Numbered Perfluorocarboxylates Predominate Over Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Serum Samples from Japan, Korea and Vietnam " Environmental International Abstract, Vol. 37, Issue 7, doi: 1 0 .101 6/j.en vin t.2011.04.0 11, 1 0 /2 0 1 1 ______________________________________________________________________ Holly Lee, et al: "A Pilot Survey of Legacy and Current Commercial Fluorinated Chemicals in Human Sera from United States Donors in 2009", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.1021/es200167q, 4 /1 2 /2 0 1 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jiaying Liu, et al: "Comparison on Gestation and Lactation Exposure of Perfluorinated Compounds for Newborns", Environment International Article, doi: 1 0 .101 6/j.en vin t.2011.05.0 01, 2011 J. Holzer, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds in Fish and Blood of Anglers at Lake M ohne, Sauerland Area, Germany", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 5 /2 /2 0 1 1 K. H. Harada, et al: "Odd-Numbered Perfluorocarboxylates Predominate Over Perfluorooctanoic Acid in Serum Samples from Japan, Korea and Vietnam ", Environment International Abstract, 5 /1 8 /2 0 1 1 J. Liu, et al: "Comparison on Gestation and Lactation Exposure of Perfluorinated Compounds for Newborns", Environment international Abstract, 5 /2 5 /2 0 1 1 F. Guo, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds in Human Blood Around Bohai Sea, China", Chemosphere Abstract, 7 /1 /2 0 1 1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ M. Wang, et al: "Temporal Changes in the Levels of Perfluorinated Compounds in California W om en Serum Over the Past 50 Years" Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 7 /6 /2 0 1 1 Sanjay Beesoon, et al: "Isomer Profiles of Perfluorochemicals in M atched M aternal, Cord and House Dust Samples: Manufacturing Sources and Transplacental Transfer", Environmental Health Perspective Abstract, 7 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Beesoon, et al: "Isomer Profiles of Perfluorochemicals in M atched M aternal, Cord and House Dust Samples: Manufacturing Sources and Transplacental Transfer", Environmental Health Perspective Abstract, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1003265, 7 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sanjay Beesoon, et al: "Isomer Profiles of Perfluorochemicals in M atched M aternal, Cord and House Dust Samples: Manufacturing Sources and Transplacental Transfer", Environmental Health Perspective Article, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1003265, 7 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 ___________________________________________________________________________ J. Bao, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds in the Environment and th e Blood of Residents Living Near Fluorochemical Plants in Fuxin, China", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 1 J. Holzer, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds in Fish and Blood of Anglers at Lake M ohne, Sauerland Area, Germany", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 45(19): 8046-8052, 5 /2 /2 0 1 1 K. T. Eriksen, et al: "Determinants of Plasma PFOA and PFOS Levels Among 652 Danish M en", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 45(19): 8137-43, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 1 K. Kato, et al: "Trends in Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in th e U.S. Population: 1999-2008", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 45(19): 8037-45, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 1 G. W . Olsen, et al: "Analysis of a Homologous Series of Perfluorocarboxylates from American Red Cross Adult Blood Donors, 2000-20 01 and 2006", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 45(19): 8022-9, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 1 J.C. D'eon, et al: "Is Indirect Exposure a Significant Contributor to th e Burden of Perfluorinated Acids Observed in Humans?", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, 45(19): 7974-84, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 1 Page 86 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 313 of 326 PAGEID #: 40475 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers O. W eib, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds in the Vicinity of a Fire Training Area - Human Biomonitoring Among 10 Persons Drinking W ater from Contaminated Private Wells in Cologne, Germany", Int J Hyg Environ Health Abstract, 1 0 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 _______________________________________________________________________________________ D.A. Haines, et al: "Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals - Early Results of the 2007-2009 Candian Health Measures Survey fo r Males and Females", Int J Hyg Environ Health Abstract, 1 0 /1 4 /2 0 1 1 C. Cornelis, et al: "First Assessment of Population Exposure to Perfluorinated Compounds in Flanders, Belgium", Chemosphere Abstract, 11/18/2 011 Alicia J. Fraser, et al: "Polyfluorinated Compounds in Serum Linked to Indoor Air in Office Environments", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.102 1/es203825 7, 1 2 /8 /2 0 1 1 From Minnesota Departm ent of Health website: East M etro PFC Biomonitoring Follow-up Project, Informational Page, Community M eeting, 1 2 /6 /2 0 1 1 Minnesota Departm ent of Health East M etro PFC Biomonitoring Follow-up Project, December 2011 Report to the Community, 2011 Arnold Schecter, et al: "Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in Texas Children from Birth through 12 Years of Age", Environmental Health Perspective Abstract, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1104325, 1 2 /1 9 /2 0 1 1 1 Arnold Schecter, et al: "Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds in Texas Children from Birth through 12 Years of Age", Environmental Health Perspective Article, doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1104325, 1 2 /1 9 /2 0 1 1 1 D. M ondal, et al: "Child-M other Pairs in a Population w ith Perfluorooctanoate Exposure from Drinking W ater", The Drinking W ater Advisor website Article, 2 /2 0 /2 0 1 2 S. K. Kim, et al: "Indoor and Outdoor Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Korea Determ ined by Passive Air Sampler", Abstract, Environ. Pollu., 162: 1 4 4 -5 0 ,3 /2 0 1 2 J.L. Butenhoff, et al: "Distribution of Perfluorooctanesulfonate and Perfluorooctanoate into Human Plasma Lipoprotein Fractions", Toxicology Letters, Abstract, doi: 1 0.101 6/j.to xlet.2012.02.0 13, 2 /2 4 /2 0 1 2 J.L. Butenhoff, et al: "Distribution of Perfluorooctanesulfonate and Perfluorooctanoate into Human Plasma Lipoprotein Fractions", Toxicology Letters, Article, doi: 1 0.101 6/j.to xlet.2012.02.0 13, 2 /2 4 /2 0 1 2 Huguette Turgeon O'Brien, et al: "Exposure to Toxic M etals and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) In Inuit Children Attending Childcare Centres in Nunavik (Canada)", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.1021/es203622v, 3 /1 5 /2 0 1 2 _____________________________________________________________________________ A.J. Schecter, et al: "Polyfluoroalkyl Compounds (PFCs) in Texas - Children from Birth Through 12 Years of Age", Abstract for conference poster board, Undated C.H. Lindh, et al: "Blood Serum Concentrations of Perfluorinated Compounds in M en from Greenlandic Inuit and European Populations", Chemosphere Abstract, 4 /6 /2 0 1 2 T . E. Arbuckle, et al: "Umbilical Cord Blood Levels of Perfluoroalkyl Acids and Polybrominated Flame Retardants", Int J. Hyg Environ Health Abstract, 4 /9 /2 0 1 2 G.W. Olsen, et al: "Temporal Trends of Perfluoroalkyl Concentrations in American Red Cross Adult Blood Donors, 2000-2010", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.1021/es300604p, 5 /3 /2 0 1 2 C.R. Stein, et al: "Comparison of Polyfluoroalkyl Compound Concentrations in M aternal Serum and Amniotic Fluid: A Pilot Study", Reprod Toxicol Abstract, 5 /1 8 /2 0 1 2 C.R. Stein, et al: "Comparison of Polyfluoroalkyl Compound Concentrations in M aternal Serum and Amniotic Fluid: A Pilot Study", Reproductive Toxicology Accepted Manuscript, doi: 10.101 6/j.rep ro to x.2012.05.0 39, 2012 Sanjay Beesoon, et al: "High Serum Levels of PFHxS in a Canadian Family Linked to M ultiple Scotchgard Applications - A Case Study", ISEE Abstract, 2012 Jessica Nelson, et al: "Two-Year Decline in Serum Perfluorochemical Concentrations in Exposed Communities in Minnesota", ISEE Abstract, 2012 Amanda Ode, et al: "Determinants of Placental Transfer of Perfluorinated Compounds", ISEE Abstract, 2012 Page 87 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 314 of 326 PAGEID #: 40476 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Anders Glynn, et al: "Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids in Blood Serum from Primiparous W om en in Sweden: Serial Sampling During Pregnancy and Nursing, and Temporal Trends 1996-2010", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.1021/es301168c, 7 /6 /2 0 1 2 ___________________________________________________________________ M . Casas, et al: "Exposure to Brominated Flame Retardants, Perfluorinated Compounds, Phthalates and Phenols in European Birth Cohorts: ENRIECO Evaluation, First Human Biomonitoring Results, and Recommendation", Int J Hyg Environ Health Abstract, 7 /1 1 /2 0 1 2 Y.G. Zhao, et al: "Environmental Contamination, Human Exposure and Body Loadings of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Focusing on Asian Countries", Chemosphere Abstract, 7 /1 1 /2 0 1 2 Jessica Nelson, et al: "Two-Year Decline in Serum Perfluorochemical Concentrations in Exposed Communities in Minnesota", Epidemiology Abstract, Vol. 23, Issue 5S, doi: 10.109 7/01.e d e .0 0 0 0 4 1 7 2 2 1 .2 0 9 8 9 .d 7 , 9 /2 0 1 2 Amanda Ode, et al: "Determinants of Placental Transfer of Perfluorinated Compounds", Epidemiology Article, Vol. 23, Issue 5S, doi: 10.109 7/0 1 .e d e .0 0 0 0 4 1 7 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 .0 d , 9 /2 0 1 2 __________________________________________ Laurence Guldner, et al: "Exposure to Polybrominated and Perfluorinated Flame Retardants Among Pregnant W om en in a Pilot Study in France", Epidemiology Abstract, doi: 10.10 9 7 /0 1 .e d e .0 0 0 0 4 1 6 6 8 3 .9 6 8 2 9 .5 2 , 9 /2 0 1 2 K. Ji, et al: "M ajo r Perfluoroalkyl Acid (PFAA) Concentrations and Influence of Food Consumption Among the General Population of Daegu, Korea", Sci Total Environ Abstract, 9 /7 /2 0 1 2 C. Schroter-Kermani, et al: "Retrospective M onitoring of Perfluorocarboxylates and Perfluorosulfonates in Human Plasma Archived by th e German Environmental Specimen Bank", Int J Hyg Environ Health Abstract, 9 /2 0 /2 0 1 2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Biomonitoring California Results, October 2012 Update, Materials for Agenda Item on "Program Update" M eeting of th e Scientific Guidance Panel (SGP), 1 1 /8 /2 0 1 2 Craig Butt, et al: "New Stain Repellent Chemical Doubling in Blood Every 6 Years", Synopsis from Environmental Health News website, 11/26 /2 0 1 2 Environmental Health Tracking and Biomonitoring: Connecting Environment, Exposure, and Public Health, Minnesota Departm ent of Health Report to the Legislature 2013, 1/2013 Y. Zhang, et al: "Isomer of Perfluorooctanesulfonate and Perfluorooctanoate and Total Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Human Serum from Two Cities in North China", Environment International Abstract, doi: 1 0 .101 6/j.en vin t.2012.12.0 07, 1 /8 /2 0 1 3 _____________________________________________________________________ H.T. W an, et al: "Blood Plasma Concentration of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Hong Kong Populations", Journal of Hazardous M aterial Abstract, doi: 10.101 6/j.jh azm at.2013.01 .034, 1 /2 4 /2 0 1 3 M.G. Porpora, et al: "Placental Transfer of Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Preliminary Study on M o th erNewborn Pairs", Int J Environ Res Public Health Abstract, doi: 10.339 0/ijerp h 10020699 , 2 /7 /2 0 1 3 L. Hanssen, et al: "Partition of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in W hole Blood and Plasma, Assessed in M aternal and Umbilical Cord Samples from Inhabitants of Arctic Russia and Uzbekistan", Sci Total Environ Abstract, doi: 10.1016/j.scito ten .2013.01.029, 2 /8 /2 0 1 3 A. Ode, et al: "Determ inants of m aternal and Fetal exposure and Temporal Trends of Perfluorinated Compounds", Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Abstract, 2 /2 4 /2 0 1 3 L.W. Yeung, et al: "Part I. A Temporal Study of PFCAs and Its Precursors in Human Plasma from Two German Cities 1982-2009", Enviromental Science & Technology Abstract, 3 /1 4 /2 0 1 3 Eva I.H. Loi, et al: "Detections of Commercial Fluorosurfactants in Hong Kong M arine Environment and Human Blood: A Pilot Study", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.1021/es303805k, 3 /2 5 /2 0 1 3 Eva I.H. Loi, et al: "Detections of Commercial Fluorosurfactants in Hong Kong M arine Environment and Human Blood: A Pilot Study", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.1021/es303805k, 3 /2 5 /2 0 1 3 R.B. Jain: "Contribution of Diet and O ther Factors to the Levels of Selected Polyfluorinated Compounds: Data from NHANES 2003-2008", Int J Hyg Environ Health Abstract, doi: 10.101 6/j.ijh eh .2013.03.00 8, 3 /2 7 /2 0 1 3 Page 88 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 315 of 326 PAGEID #: 40477 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers M. Yamaguchi, et al: "Consumption of Seafood, Serum Liver Enzymes, and Blood Levels of PFOS and PFOA in the Japanese Population, J Occup Health Abstract, 4 /6 /2 0 1 3 5 /7 /2 0 1 3 Email from Minnesota Departm ent of Health to Bilott regarding MDH News Release: Results of Survey of East M etro Residents' Exposures to PFCs 5 /8 /2 0 1 3 Email from Minnesota Departm ent of Health to Bilott regarding Community M eeting M ay 15: East M etro PFC Biomonitoring Follow-up Project G. W . Lien, et al: "Neonatal-M aternal Factors and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Cord Blood", Chemosphere Abstract, doi: 10.1016/j.chem osphere.2013.04.038, 2 /1 7 /2 0 1 3 From Minnesota Departm ent of Health website: Update regarding East M etro PFC Biomonitoring Follow-up Project, 5 /2 0 /2 0 1 3 _________________________________________________________________________________________ Minnesota Departm ent of Health East M etro PFC Biomonitoring Follow-up Project M ay 2013 Report to the Community, Survey Analysis: How are Participants Exposed to PFCs?, Undated Tao Zhang, et al: "Distribution of Poly- and Perfluoralkyl Substances in matched Samples from Pregnant W om en and Carbon Chain Length Related M aternal Transfer", Environmental Science & Technology Abstract, doi: 10.1021/es400937y, 6 /1 8 /2 0 1 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ Tao Zhang, et al: "Distribution of Poly- and Perfluoralkyl Substances in matched Samples from Pregnant W om en and Carbon Chain Length Related M aternal Transfer", Environmental Science & Technology Article, doi: 10.1021/es400937y, 6 /1 8 /2 0 1 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ CDC Perfluorochemicals (PFCs) Fact Sheet, 2012 From California OEHHA website: Perfluorochemicals (PFCs), list of site links re Biomonitoring California, 2013 M aternal and Infant Environmental Exposure Project (MIEEP), Biomonitoring California website, Slides, 2013 Biomonitoring California: MIEEP Study Results, 7 /2 0 1 3 Info re: California Teachers Study (CTS), Biomonitoring California website, 7 /2 0 1 3 Biomonitoring California: California Teachers Study (CTS), Results, 7 /2 0 1 3 H. Y. Kim, et al: "The Relationships Between Sixteen Perfluorinated Compound Concentrations in Blood Serum and Food, and O ther Parameters, in th e General Population of South Korea w ith Proportionate Stratified Sampling M ethod", Abstract, Sci Total Environ, doi: 10.1016/j.scito ten v.2013.06.039, 7 /5 /2 0 1 3 L.W. Yeung, et al: "Profiles of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in the Liver and Serum of Patients with Liver Cancer and Cirrhosis in Australia", Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Abstract, doi: 10.1016/j.en co en v.2013.06.006, 7 /9 /2 0 1 3 J.Y. Hsu, et al: "Background Levels of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Humans from Taiwan: Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Perfluorooctanoic Acid", Chemosphere Abstract, doi: 10.1016/j.chem osphere.2013.06.047, 7 /2 2 /2 0 1 3 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Christa Schroter-Kermani, e ta l: "The German Environmental Specimen Bank: Human Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances - Time Trends and Itner-Individual Variation", Abstract for Environment and Health conference in Basel, Switzerland, 8 /1 9 /2 0 1 3 Kayoko Kato, et al: "M aternal and Fetal Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals During Gestation", Abstract for Environment and Health conference in Basel, Switzerland, 8 /1 9 /2 0 0 1 3 Tony Fletcher, et al: "Serum Levels of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in M others and Infants: Transplacental and Lactational Transfer from the M other", Abstract for Environment and Health conference in Basel, Switzerland, 8 /1 9 /2 0 1 3 E. Okada, et al: "Temporal Trends of Perfluoralkyl Acids in plasma Samples of Pregnant W om en in Hokkaido, Japan, 2003-2011", Environ Int Abstract, doi: 10.101 6/j.en vin t.2013.07.0 13, 9 /5 /2 0 1 3 Susan M . Pinney, et al: "Serum Biomarkers of Polyfluoroalkyl Compound Exposure in Young Girls in Greater Cincinnati and the San Franciso Bay Area, USA", Article, Environmental Pollution184(2014): 327-334, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.09.008, 9/8/2013 Page 89 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 316 of 326 PAGEID #: 40478 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Susan M . Pinney, et al: "Serum Biomarkers of Polyfluoroalkyl Compound Exposure in Young Girls in Greater Cincinnati and the San Franciso Bay Area, USA", Abstract - 9 /2 4 /2 0 1 3 Ann D. Hernick, et al: "Sharing Unexpected Biomarker Results with Study Participants", Environmental Health Perspectives Article doi: 1 0 .128 9/eh p .1001988, 9 /2 9 /2 0 1 0 D. Ehresman, et al: "Evaluation of th e Half-Life (T%) of Elimination of Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) from Human Serum", poster abstract for presentation, Undated D. Ehresman, et al: "A Comparison of W hole Blood, Plasma, and Serum Evaluations for the Determ ination of PFOS, PFHS, PFBS and PFOA in Human Subjects", poster abstract fo r presentation, Undated 3M report: Analytical and Research properties - 3M Industrial Hygiene Laboratory: M ethod for Determining NEthyl Perfluorooctanesulfonamide in Air, January 1993 A R 2 2 6 -1 2 1 5 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ M .I. Beser, et al: "Determ ination of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances in Airborne Particulate M a tte r by Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry", J Chromatogr A Abstract, 5 /2 4 /2 0 1 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 /2 0 /2 0 0 3 Letter from Christopher Jones, Ohio EPA, to Bilott regarding DuPont, Washington Works C8 Issues USEPA Docket: Document No. O PPT-2003-0012-0225, 1 0 /2 0 /2 0 0 3 ___________________________________________ 1 0 /2 9 /2 0 0 3 Letter from R.L. Ritchey of DuPont to W V DEP Perry McDaniel and Dee Ann Staats regarding Consent Order G W R -2001-019______________________________________________________________________________ 1 0 /3 0 /2 0 0 3 Letter from R.L. Ritchey of DuPont to W V DEP Perry McDaniel and Dee Ann Staats regarding Consent Order G W R -2001-019 and Q uarterly Emission Report for Second Q uarter 2003, dated July 28, 2003 W V DEP Fact Sheet, For Draft/Proposed Permitting Action Under 45CSR30 and Title V of the Clean Air Act re DuPont Washington Works permit No. R 30-10700001-2003 W V DEP Division of Air Quality Permit to O perate Pursuant to Title V of th e Clean Air Act Issued to E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc. perm it No. R 30-10700001-2003 A R 2 2 6 -1 8 7 7 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ AR226-1774; AR226-2670___________________________________________________________________________________ 1 0 /3 1 /2 0 0 4 Email from DuPont Andrea V. Malinowski to USEPA M ary Dominiak transm itting PFOA Particle Size Distribution Reports 3 /1 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Andrew Hartten to Robert Griffin, Little Hocking W a te r Association transm itting Final Analytical Sampling Results Event 1 Air Sampling 3 /7 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Andrew Hartten to Robert Griffin, Little Hocking W a te r Association transm itting Final Analytical Sampling Results Events 2, 3 and 4 Air Sampling 3 /2 1 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Andrew Hartten to Robert Griffin, Little Hocking W ater Association transm itting Final Analytical Sampling Results Events 5, 7, 7, and 8 Air Sampling 3 /2 7 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Andrew Hartten to Robert Griffin, Little Hocking W ater Association transm itting Final Analytical Sampling Results Event 9 Air Sampling 7 /2 5 /2 0 0 6 Letter from David W . Boothe to USEPA transm itting Submission of Biennial Reports Pursuant APFO Users LOI Dated March 14, 2003 1 0 /9 /2 0 0 6 Letter from Thomas B. Johnston of McKenna Long to USEPA transm itting8EHQ -04-15856 Supplemental Information 1 /3 /2 0 0 7 Letter from Andrea V. Malinowski of DuPont to USEPA transm itting journal article 1 /2 5 /2 0 0 7 Letter from Andrea V. Malinowski to USEPA transm itting 8EHQ -04-15856 Supplemental Submission A R 2 2 6 -0 0 6 4 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 0 /1 2 /2 0 0 1 Letter from R.L. Ritchey of DuPont to James C. Cox of LPSD regarding LPSD W ater Sample Analytical Results Page 90 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 317 of 326 PAGEID #: 40479 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Gretchen N. Hebert, et al: "M ethod fo r th e Determ ination of Sub-ppm Concentrations of Perfluoroalkylsulfonate Anions in W ater", Journal of Environmental M onitoring Abstract, doi: 10.1039/B 108463C , 1 /1 4 /2 0 0 2 Karen Risha, et al: "M ethod for Trace Level Analysis of C8, C9, C10, C11, and C13 Perfluorocarbon Carboxylic Acids in W ater", Article: Analytical Chemistry, doi: 10.102 1/ac049054 8, 2005 Slides "Overview of th e Analysis of Perfluorinated Acids", Presented by W illiam K. Reagen, PhD, 3M Environmental Lab: Analytical overview fo r EPA Office of W ater Quality R. Enevoldsen, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs) in G roundwater and Aqueous Soil Extracts: Using Inline SPE-LC-MS/MS for Screening and Sorption Characterization of Perfluorooctane Sulphonate and Related Compounds", Anal Bioanal Chem Abstract, 8 /2 7 /2 0 1 0 R. Enevoldsen, et al: "Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs) in G roundwater and Aqueous Soil Extracts: Using Inline SPE-LC-MS/MS for Screening and Sorption Characterization of Perfluorooctane Sulphonate and Related Compounds", Anal Bioanal Chem Abstract, 8 /2 7 /2 0 1 0 M W H Laboratories Standard Operating Procedure for The Determ ination of Perfluorinated Pollutants in Environmental Matrices by Online Solid-Phase Extraction Coupled w ith High-Performance Liquid Chrom atography/Mass Spectrometry in Tandem, 7 /1 1 /2 0 0 8 J.A. Shoemaker, USEPA, et al: EPA Document #: E P A /600/R -08 /092 "M ethod 537. Determ ination of Selected Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids in Drinking W a te r by Solid Phase Extraction and Liquid Chrom atography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)", Sept. 2008 D. Cao, et al: "Quantitative Detection of Trace Perluorinated Compounds in Environmental W ater Samples by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Tim e of Flight Mass Spectrometry w ith 1,8bis(tetram ethylguanidino)-naphthalene as M atrix", Abstract, Talanta 85(1): 345-52, 7 /1 5 /2 0 1 1 S. Dolman, et al: "An Optimized M ethod fo r th e Determ ination of Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sufonate and Other Perfluorochemicals in Different Matrices Using Liquid Chrom atography/ion-trap Mass Spectrometry", J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. biomed. Life Sci., Abstract, 5 /3 0 /2 0 1 1 S. Ullah, et al: "Simultaneous Determ ination of Perfluoroalkyl Phosphonates, Carboxylates, and Sulfonates in Drinking W ater", J Chromatogr A, 7 /8 /2 0 1 1 __________________________________________________________________ 1 0 /3 1 /2 0 0 0 Letter from James M . Cox, Lubeck Public Service District, to Lubeck PDS Customer regarding PFOA 1 0 /1 3 /2 0 0 1 Email from Bernard Reilly to Bern regarding drinking w ater concentrations and testing levels (Bates Nos. illegible) W V DEP News Release regarding Ground W a te r Use Survey Notification and Assistance Requested, 1 2 /6 /2 0 0 1 Letter from State of W V to Resident "Sorry w e missed you" attaching Ground W a te r Use Survey, Undated W V DEP Im portant Notice, Ground W a te r Use Survey, 1 2 /2 0 0 1 Ohio State Coordinating Com m ittee on Groundwater: M eeting M inutes from 1 /1 7 /2 0 0 2 M eeting to Promote and Guide the Implementation of a Coordinated, Comprehensive and Effective Ground W ater Protection and Managem ent Program for the State of Ohio 1 /2 3 /2 0 0 2 Little Hocking W ater Association News Release #2 regarding C-8 in production wells Little Hocking W a te r Association, New Release # 2, "W ater Association Prepares for Meeting", 2 /6 /2 0 0 2 From The Little Hocking W a te r Association website: C-8 Test Results (ppb), 2 /1 2 /2 0 0 2 From the The Little Hocking W ater Association website: C-8 Test Results, 2 /1 2 /2 0 0 2 , New Release #1 The Little Hocking W ater Association, Inc. 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 2 , New Release #2 The Little Hocking W a te r Association, Inc. 1 /2 3 /2 0 0 2 , New Release #3 The Little Hocking W ater Association 2 /6 /2 0 0 2 , M arietta Times 2 /1 3 /2 0 0 2 , 'Little Hocking w ater customers confront DuPont" 3 /2 7 /2 0 0 2 The Little Hocking W ater Association website: Round #3-W ell Sampling fo r 2 /2 2 /2 0 0 2 Page 91 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 318 of 326 PAGEID #: 40480 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers 1 1 / 2 5 /2 0 0 2 from The Little Hocking W ater Association website., Round #4-W ell Sampling Results for 3 /2 6 /2 0 0 2 ._________________________________________________________________________________________________ Letter from General M anager Robert L. Griffin to Dave Watkins Assistant Chief, Division of W ater Resources, Re: Groundwater W ell Testing for DuPont's C-8 S tudy,4/4/2002 The Little Hocking W a te r Association, Inc. News Release #4, page 1 of 2, 4 /1 8 /2 0 0 2 From The Little Hocking W a te r Association website, Round #5 W ell Sampling Results fo r 4 /2 3 /2 0 0 2 Little Hocking News Release #6, U.S EPA Lab to Run C-8 Samples, 4 /2 5 /2 0 0 2 Ohio EPA news release re public meeting on C-8, 5 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 The Little Hocking W ater Association, Inc., News Release #7, C-8 Does Not Belong In Our Drinking W ater, 5 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Gist M eeting Agenda, 5 /1 5 /2 0 0 2 From Little Hocking W ater Association website: Draft News Release #8, Sampling Investigation Plan for Little Hocking W ater W ell Field, 8 /1 6 /2 0 0 2 From the Little Hocking W ater Association website: News Release #9, W ell Sampling Results for August 21 30,2002, 1 0 /1 0 /2 0 0 2 _______________________________________________________________________________________ News Release #11, Round #7 W ell Field Sampling Results for October 16,2002, 1 1 /2 1 /2 0 0 2 WVDEP letter to James Tennant re sample results , 1 /2 4 /2 0 0 3 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP transmitting C-8 data summary report, 2 /5 /2 0 0 3 A R 2 2 6 -1 4 0 8 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont Third Quarter 2003 C-8 Surface W ater and Groundwater Monitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart and Dry Run Landfills Washington, W V, 1 0 /200 3 Article authored by Rich Purdy, 1 1 /7 /2 0 0 3 " Radial Fluoride Gradient from DuPont's Washington Works M anufacture Facility: Caused by Fluoro Telom er Pollution?", 1 1 /6 /2 0 0 3 Correspondence from Rich Purdy to WVDEP 1 1 /1 1 /2 0 0 3 Re: W V/NPDES Permit Application No. W V 0076244, From Little Hocking W ater Association website: C-8 Results for Little Hocking Distribution System, 1 1 /2 4 /2 0 0 3 Correspondence form DuPont to WVDEP re 4th quarter results, 1 /1 1 /2 0 0 4 Letter dated 4 /1 6 /2 0 0 4 from D. David Altman to Laurence Janssen of DuPont (4 pages). (Document w ithout Bates numbers produced by DuPont in Leach case). Letter dated 4 /2 7 /2 0 0 4 from D. David Altman to Laurence Janssen of DuPont (2 pages). (Document w ithout Bates numbers produced by DuPont in Leach case). Correspondence from DuPont to USEPA re 2nd quarter results, 9 /1 /2 0 0 4 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP re 2nd quarter results, 9 /2 0 /2 0 0 4 DuPont letter dated 1 0 /7 /0 4 from Andrea Malinowski to EPA transm itting NPDES permits. O PPT-2003-0012 Exygen Research, Fluorochemical Characterization of W a te r Samples Analytical Results, 1 0 /2 6 /2 0 0 4 , 1 0 /5 /2 0 0 4 , Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP, Residential Sampling Results, W est Virginia and Ohio, 1 1 /8 /2 0 0 4 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP re 3rd quarter results, David Watkins, 1 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 4 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP, David W a tk in s ,1 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 4 , Lakin W ellfield Sampling Results- October 2 0 0 4 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 4Q 04 Residential Sampling Results, W V and Ohio, 1 /6 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 4Q 04 Public W ater Supply Results, W V and Ohio, 1 /1 1 /2 0 0 4 Correspondence from DuPont to Daniel M. Philion The Garden City Group, Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-January 20 -February 4, 2005, 2 /2 4 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to David P. W atkins WVDEP, 1Q05 Public W a te r Results, 3 /2 1 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to David P. W atkins WVDEP, 1Q05 Public W a te r Results, 3 /2 1 /2 0 0 5 Page 92 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 319 of 326 PAGEID #: 40481 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sample results from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004315-2 (90 pages)_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sample results from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004322 (76 pages) Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sample results from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004315-1 (90 Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sampleresults from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004319 (82 pages) Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sampleresults from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004366 (62 pages) Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sampleresults from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004472 (70 pages) Exygen Research Analytical Report: Sampleresults from M OU Sampling 1/0 5 . Report No. L0004505 (69 pages) Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 1Q05 Public W a te r Supply R esults,4/11/2005 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 2Q05 Residential Sampling Results,6/3/2005 Correspondence from WVDEP to Jim Tennant re well sampling results,, 6 /7 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 2Q05 Public W a te r Supply Results, 7 /1 9 /2 0 0 5 DuPont 2004 APFO/PFOA Monitoring Summary Report, 07/2005 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 2Q05 Public W ater Supply Results, 8 /5 /2 0 0 5 DuPont Correspondence to USEPA w ith 2004 APFO/PFOA M onitoring Summary Report, 8 /9 /2 0 0 5 DuPont Correspondence to USEPA w ith Fluorochemical Characterization of W ater Samples Analytical Results, 8 /2 3 /2 0 0 5 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont Correspondence to WVDEP, Point Pleasant Public W ater Supply Sampling- M ay 2005, 8 /2 4 /2 0 0 5 USEPA Email to Andrea Malinowski of DuPont re response to OEPA comments on monitoring M O U ,9 /2 9 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP 3Q05 Residential Sampling Results, 9 /2 9 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to The Garden City Group, Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-July 13,2005, 1 0 /4 /2 0 0 5 ________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Steven W illiam of Ohio EPA re response to comments, 1 0 /1 0 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP, W astew ater Sump Testing. 1 0 /2 0 /2 0 0 5 Fax from Parkersburg Utility Board to Bill Toom ey Office of W V Environmental Health Services re C-8 in w ater, 1 1 /1 /2 0 0 5 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from Parkersburg Utility Board to David W atkins DEP re C-8 in w ater, 1 1 /0 1 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to Daniel M . Philion w ith The Garden City Group, Inc., "Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-August 29 through September 2, 2005, 1 1 /0 2 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer The Garden City Group, Inc., "Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-September 2,2005 W est Virginia and Ohio, 1 1 /3 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from DuPont to David W atkins W VDEP,"3Q05 Public W ater Supply Results, 1 1 /1 0 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from Parkersburg Utility Board to David W atkins of WVDEP re C-8 in w ater, 1 1 /1 1 /2 0 0 5 Correspondence from Parkersburg Utility Board to David W atkins WVDEP included PFOA (C-8) L e v e l s , 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 0 0 5 _________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -3 5 8 1 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer The Garden City Group, Inc. 2 /1 0 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Robert Griffin w ith Little Hocking W a te r Association re sample resu lts,3/2/2006 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer w ith The Garden City Group, Inc. 3 /2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer w ith th e Garden City Group, Inc. 3 /6 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Robert Griffin w ith Little Hocking W a te r Association, Final Analytical Sampling Results W ell Sampling-3Q05 Amended Report, 3 /9 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer-The Garden City Group, Inc., Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-November 17,2005 O h io ,3 /1 5 /2 0 0 6 Page 93 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 320 of 326 PAGEID #: 40482 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Correspondence from DuPont to The Garden City Group, Inc. re residential sampling, 3 /2 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer w ith The Garden City Group Inc., 'Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-November 29,2005 Ohio, 3 /2 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to W illiam Toomey, W V HHR, M anager Source W a te r Assessment and Protection, re Parkersburg PUB w ater sampling results, 3 /2 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Chad Board WVDEP re amended public w ater supply results, 3 /3 0 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Chad Board WVDEP, 1Q06 Public W ater Supply Results, W V, DuPont Washington Works, Washington WV, 4 /5 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to John Anderson of Village of Pomeroy re Village of Pomeroy W ater Dept. Quarterly Sampling ,4 /2 6 /2 0 0 6 Exygen Research Analytical Report, The Payne Firm Inc. Analysis of PFOA in W ater Samples, Exygen Report N o .L 0 0 0 8 1 1 1 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer, Amended Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results-West Virginia and Ohio, 5 /1 0 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer w ith The Garden City Group, Inc., 'Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results- March 27, 2006 W est Virginia, 5 /1 7 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from Parkersburg Utility Board to Chad Board, Division of W ater and W aste M anagem ent re:C-8 testing,5/24/2006 Fax from Bill Toomey, Departm ent of Health and Human Resources to Perry McDaniels of WVDEP, transmitting Parkersburg PUB data from 1 0 /2 4 /0 5 and 1 2 /2 9 /0 5 ,, 5 /2 4 /2 0 0 6 ______________________________________________ Correspondence from WVDEP to DuPont,6/1/2006 Correspondence from DuPont to John Anderson of Village of Pomeroy re Village of Pomeroy W ater Dept. Quarterly Sam pling,2Q06,6/13/2006 Correspondence from DuPont to Michael Betz ,City of Belpre, re: Belpre Public W ater Works M onthly SamplingApril-M ay 2006, 6 /1 3 /2 0 0 6 __________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Donald Poole ofTuppers Plains-Chester W ater D istrict,6/13/2006 Correspondence from DuPont to Donna Smith re Blennerhassett Island W ell Sampling April 2006, 6 /1 3 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Christine Rohrer, Residential Sampling APFO and PFOA Results- June 5,2006 Ohio, 6 /2 7 /2 0 0 6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Alfred F. Buchanan, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Quarter 2006 Sampling Event-BuchananAF,7/12/2006 Correspondence from DuPont to John Board, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Quarter 2006 Sampling Event, 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Rex Goudy, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event, 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Rex Goudy, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event, 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Rex Goudy, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event, 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to John M . Little Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event-LittleJM ,7/12/2006 Correspondence from DuPont to Tonia M oore Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event-"MooreT", 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 __________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to W illiam Null, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event-"NuLLWH", 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Page 94 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 321 of 326 PAGEID #: 40483 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Correspondence from DuPont to Fred L. Price, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Quarter 2006 Sampling Event- "PriceFL", 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 __________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Stephen P. Ryan, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Quarter 2006 Sampling Event-"RyanSP", 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Floyd E. Boso, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event-"BosoFE" Correspondence from DuPont to Pearl H. Swain, Residential GAC System APFO and PFOA Results Second Q uarter 2006 Sampling Event-"SwainPH" 7 /1 2 /2 0 0 6 Biennial Report fo r APFO M anufacture Calendar Years of 2004 and 2005,DuPont Fayetteville Works, ,7 /2 5 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Donald Poole, "Tuppers Plains-Chester W a te r District APFO and PFOA Analytical Results Results-July 2 0 0 6 ,8 /2 9 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to John Anderson, Village of Pomeroy W a te r Departm ent Q uarterly Sampling APFO and PFOA Results- July 2006, 8 /2 9 /2 0 0 6 ________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to James M . Cox, Lubeck Service District APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-August 2006, 9 /1 9 /2 0 0 6 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Board of Public Affairs, Request for DuPont to Analyze W ater, 9 /2 0 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to John Anderson, Village of Pomeroy W a te r Departm ent Q uarterly Sampling APFO and PFOA Results- July 2006, 8 /2 9 /2 0 0 6 ________________________________________________________________ Correspondence from DuPont to Michael Betz, Public Works Superintendent City Of Belpre, Belpre Public Works Public W ater Supply M onthly Sampling APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-August 2006, 1 0 /4 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Donald Poole, "Tuppers Plains-Chester W a te r District APFO and PFOA Analytical Results- Septem ber 2006 M onthly M onitoring and 2006 Annual Monitoring, 1 0 /1 3 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Michael B e tz,, Belpre Public Works Public W ater Supply M onthly Sampling APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-August 2006, 1 0 /4 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Donald Poole, Tupper Plains-Chester W ater District Public W ater Supply APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-October 2006,M o n th ly Monitoring, 1 1 /7 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to Michael Betz City of Belpre, Belpre Public Works Public W ater Supply APFO and PFOA Analytical Results October 2006 M onthly M o n ito rin g ,1 1 /7 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence from DuPont to John Anderson, Village of Pomeroy W a te r Departm ent Q uarterly Sampling APFO and PFOA Results- September 2006 M onthly M onitoring and 2006 Annual M onitoring, 1 1 /7 /2 0 0 6 USEPA Factsheet and Consent Order between USEPA and DuPont, 1 1 /2 1 /2 0 0 6 Correspondence to Roger Reinhart USEPA Region III from DuPont, Q uarterly Progress Report No. 1 ,1 /3 /2 0 0 7 WVDEP letter to DuPont re NPDES p e rm it,,1 /1 6 /2 0 0 7 Correspondence from Michael Betz, City of Belpre, "Belpre Public Works Public W a te r Supply APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-February 2007 Monthly Monitoring, 4 /4 /2 0 0 7 Brochure, Parkersburg Utility Board Annual Drinking W ater Quality Report, 6 /2 0 0 7 DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #7 Phase II M onitoring/Sam pling W ork Plan, 8 /3 /2 0 0 7 Correspondence from DuPont to Donald Poole, Tupper Plains- Chester W a te r District Public W ater Supply APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-July 2007 M onthly M onitoring, 9 /1 9 /2 0 0 7 Correspondence from DuPont to Donald Poole, Tupper Plains- Chester W a te r District Public W ater Supply APFO and PFOA Analytical Results-August 2007 M onthly Monitoring, 1 0 /2 /2 0 0 7 Correspondence from DuPont to Michael Betz, City Of Belpre," Belpre Public Works Public W ater Supply APFO and PFOA Analytical Results August 2007 M onthly M o n ito rin g ,1 0 /2 /2 0 0 7 Correspondence from DuPont to James M . Cox, Lubeck Public Service District APFO and PFOA Analytical Results August 2007 Monthly Monitoring, 1 0 /4/20 07 Page 95 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 322 of 326 PAGEID #: 40484 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Correspondence from DuPont to James M . Cox, Lubeck Public Service District APFO and PFOA Analytical Results 3 Q 0 7 Backwash Sam pling,10/9/2007 Correspondence from DuPont to Dennis Rezabek of W arren W ater Association, W arren W a te r and Sewer Association APFO and PFOA Analytical Results, Septem ber 2007 M onitoring, 1 0 /3 0 /2 0 0 7 DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #8 Phase II M onitoring Sampling W ork P lan ,1 1 /2 /2 0 0 7 Tables, figures and analytical results from DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #11 dated 8 /1 /0 8 (189 pages) DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #11 Phase II M onitoring Sampling W ork P lan ,8 /1 /2 0 0 8 Correspondence from DuPont to Donna Smith re well sample results, 2 /2 0 /2 0 0 8 Table 4.1 APFO and PFOA Results for Public W ater Supply Sampling, W V and Ohio Q uarterly M OU Status Report #9, 2 /4 /2 0 0 8 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Correspondence and report from DuPont to USEPA: Quarterly M OU Status Report #12, 1 1 /3 /2 0 0 8 Correspondence from DuPont to USEPA transm itting attached Q uarterly M OU Status Report #13, ,2 /3 /2 0 0 9 MPI Analytical Report, "Fluorochemical Characterization of Aqueous Samples, February 2009 MPI Fluorochemical Characterization of W ater Samples Analytical Results, sample nos. L0019193-1 to L00191936 ,3 /1 7 /2 0 0 9 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #14 Phase II M onitoring/Sam pling W ork Plan, 5 /1 /2 0 0 9 Correspondence from DuPont to WVDEP, Washington Works-NPDES Permit W V 001279 Supplement to July Discharge M onitoring R ep o rt,9 /1 6 /2 0 0 9 Email from Katherine Davis to Andrew S Hartten. "Draft Result L e tte r",1 9 /1 9 /2 0 0 9 Correspondence from DuPont to USEPA Region II, "Quarterly Progress Report N o .1 3 ",1 2 /1 7 /2 0 0 9 DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #16, Phase II M onitoring/Sam pling W ork P lan ,10/29 /2009 DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #17, Phase II M onitoring/Sam pling W ork P lan ,10/29 /2009 Correspondence from DuPont to Roger Reinhart U.S EPA Region III, "Quarterly Progress Report No.15", 7 /1 /2 0 1 0 Analytical Report from MPI Research, "Summary of PFOA W ater Samples, 7 /2 6 /2 0 1 0 Correspondence from DuPont to USEPA transm itting Q uarterly M OU Status Report No. 1, Phase III, 5 /3 /2 0 1 1 DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #2 Phase III-Future W ork P lan ,8 /3 /2 0 1 1 Correspondence from DuPont to Roger Reinhart and Ryan Bahr, USEPA Region III and Region V, transm itting quarterly progress report #20, 9 /3 0 /2 0 1 1 Correspondence from DuPont to Roger Reinhart and Ryan Bahr, USEPA Region III and Region V, transmitting quarterly progress report #21, 1 2 /2 1 /2 0 1 1 Correspondence from DuPont to Roger Reinhart, USEPA docket ID Number O PPT-2004-0113, transmitting quarterly MOU status report #4, 2 /3 /2 0 1 2 Correspondence from DuPont to Roger Reinhart and Ryan Bahr USEPA Region III, Region V, transmitting quarterly progress report #22, 3 /3 0 /2 0 1 2 Correspondence From DuPont to USEPA, Docket ID No. OPPT-0113, transm itting quarterly MOU status report # 5 ,5 /3 /2 0 1 2 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont Q uarterly M OU Status Report #6 Phase III, 8 /3 /2 0 1 2 Correspondence from DuPont to USEPA transm itting attached quarterly status report #6, 8 /3 /2 0 1 2 Correspondence from DuPont to Roger Reinhart U.S EPA Region III, and Ryan Bahr U.S EPA Region V, transm itting Q uarterly Progress Report No.24, 1 0 /1 /2 0 1 2 Summary: C-8 Sampling and Treatm ent Under W V and EPA Orders to DuPont Washington Works Facility, Undated Map: C-8 Levels in Public W ater Supplies and C-8 Levels in Air Correspondence from DuPont to Robert Griffin, attaching : Final Analytical Sampling Results Rain Sampling, 3 /1 /2 0 0 6 Page 96 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 323 of 326 PAGEID #: 40485 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers W ildlife International report prepared for 3M , "Analytical Method Validation for The Determination of Perfluorooctanesulfonate, Potassium Salt (PFOS) In Artificial Soil, W ildlife International, LTD Project Number 454C-120., Study Initiation d a te ,2 /5 /2 0 0 1 Study Completion date, 5,27,2003 Email to M ary Dominiak USEPA, from Andrea V. Malinowski of DuPont transm itting PFOA Soil Sampling and Analysis Report Poster fo r conference presentation: Melissa M . Schltz, et al, "Behavior of Fluorochemicals During W astew ater T reatm en t" Poster fo r conference presentation from Perdue University, Jinxia Lio and Linda S. Lee, Departm ent of Agronomy, re: "Solubility and Sorption of 8:2 Fluorotelom er Alcohol by Surface Soils Enevoldsen R. Juhler, Pub M ed website article, "Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in groundwater and aqueous soil extracts: using inline SPE-LC-MS/MS fo r screening and sorption characterization of perfluorooctane sulphonate and related compounds", Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 8 /2 7 /2 0 1 0 Table from Little Hocking W ater website, " Soil Results from Borings Little Hocking W ater Association", Washington County, Ohio, 1 1 /3 0 /2 0 0 4 Draft Letter from Rob Kendall, Senior Geologist URS-Diamond, "Residential M ulti-m edia Sampling Request DuPont Washington Works Facility, Washington, W V, 6 /8 /2 0 0 5 USEPA M em orandum from Eric J. W eb er to Charles Auer transmitting, attached report "Items to Consider Regarding PFOA in Soils" 1 0 /1 1 /2 0 0 5 ________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 - 6 1 2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sean Gallagher of Centre Analytical Labs - report for 3M : "Extraction of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate from Egg M em brane,Album etn,and Yolk for Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry, 9 /6 /2 0 0 1 Exygen Research Analytical Phase Protocol "Extraction of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate From Mallard and Quail Egg Yolk fo r Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass S p ectro m etry",1/2/2001 Draft letter from Rob Kendall, Senior Geologist URS-Diamond, "Residential M ulti-m edia Sampling Request DuPont Washington Works Facility, Washington, W V, 6 /8 /2 0 0 5 List of instructions re "Collection and Handling of Samples fo r Analysis of PFOA, PFOS and Other Fluorinated Compounds", undated Malinsky M D, et al,: " Determ ination of perfluorinated compounds in fish fillet homogenates: M ethod validation and application to fillet homogenates from the Mississippi River, Abstract, Anal Chim Acta. 1 /1 0 /2 0 11;683(2):248-57.E p u b 20 10 Nov3.___________________________________________________________________ Hoon Yoot, et al: /'Q u an titative Determ ination of Perfluorochemicals and Fluorotelom er Alcohols in Plants for Biosolid-Amended Fields using LC /M S/M S and GC/MS, Abstract, Environ. Sci. Tech., 1 /1 9 /2 0 1 1 Paiano V, et al: "Liquid chrom atography-tanden mass spectrometry analysis of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic Acid in fish fillet samples", Abstract, J Ana M ethods Chem .2012;2012:719010.Epub 3 /1 8 /2 0 1 2 Letter to Charles Moses WVDEP from Lynne E. Bailey of USEPA re: "Toxicity Test Conditions and Results", 8 /2 8 /2 0 0 3 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ A R 2 2 6 -1 8 8 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Draft letter from Rob Kendall, URS-Diamond re: "Residential M ulti-m edia Sampling Request DuPont Washington Works Facility, Washington, W V, 6 /8 /2 0 0 5 Letter dated 4 /6 /0 6 from Andrew Hartten of DuPont to Robert Griffin of Little Hocking W ater Association transm itting attached Exygen reports - - final analytical sampling results of small m ammal sampling (214 pages) S.A. M abury,et al.: "Perfluorinated Surfactants In Environmental Samples: Analysis By LC/M S/M S, symposium paper presented to Div. of Env. Chemistry of the American Chemical Society, 4 /7 /2 0 0 2 Page 97 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 324 of 326 PAGEID #: 40486 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Email from Putte, M ieke van der to Leeuwen,Stefan van re: "W orldwide interlaboratory study for Perfluorinated Compounds (P FC s),10/18/2004_____________________________________________________________________________ From EPA website: Abstract re Environmental Chemistry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues, presented at EnviroAnalysis 2004 conference, Toronto, 1 1 /1 0 /2 0 0 4 3M report dated 1 0 /2 7 /9 7 : Results from Analyses of Soil and G roundwater Samples from th e E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company Facility in Parkersburg, W V (124 pages) Executive Summary, documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination Report re DuPont Washington Works, Interim Final 2 /5 /1 9 9 9 Blank forms for RCRA Corrective Action: Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determ ination Environmental Indicator Determ ination Report: Current Human Exposures Under Control, DuPont Washington W o rk s ,, 9 /2 0 0 3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Fax dated 1 1 /1 9 /0 3 to Kathleen Welch from Bill W en tw o rth of USEPA transm itting , mail to W illiam W entw orth from Andrew S. Hartten dated 9 /2 9 /0 3 re:W W 725EI A R 2 2 6 -1 8 7 7 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Email from M ary Dominiak of USEPA to R. Bilott transm itting draft DuPont PFOA M onitoring M OU, 2 /1 7 /2 0 0 4 USEPA Email from Blouin John to Dominiak M ary EPA, re Submittal of Draft DuPont Environmental M onitoring W ork Plan, 4 /7 /2 0 0 4 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Letter to M ary Dominiak USEPA from Andrew S. Hartten," Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sam pling W ork Plan 1 1 /5 /2 0 0 4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Letter to EPA from David Boothe of DuPont for docket, transm itting 7 /1 2 /0 6 letter from D uont to WVDEP : Docket ID Number O PPT-2003-0012, 7 /2 1 /2 0 0 6 ______________________________________________________________ Letter to USEPA from Andrea V. Malinowski of DuPont transm itting journal article Letter to TSCA Document Processing Center USEPA from DuPont Andrea V. Malinowski re: 8EH Q -04-15856 Supplemental Submission, 1 /2 5 /2 0 0 7 Letter to USEPA from Thomas B. Johnston of McKenna firm transm itting supplemental information for docket, 1 0 /9 /2 0 0 6 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ USEPA Revised Draft Hazard Assessment fo r PFOA, October 2002 USEPA Draft Hazard Assessment fo r PFOA (corrected 4 /1 5 /2 0 0 2 ) USEPA Draft Hazard Assessment fo r PFOA dated March 2002 Amended Complaint filed in Leach v. DuPont case DuPont report: Ohio River W ater Sampling Proposal for the Washington Works Facility and the Letart Landfill, 0 2 /2 0 0 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ DuPont 1 2 /1 7 /2 0 0 1 report: Emission Modeling Data Required in Consent Order G W R-2001-019, VII.D DuPont report dated 0 4 /2 0 0 2 : O ne-M ile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Report and Ohio River Public W ater Supply Sampling - DuPont's Washington Works (Decem ber 2001- February 2002) DuPont report: G roundwater Investigation Quality Assurance Project Plan fo r Washington Works Plant, 0 1 /2 0 0 2 DuPont 0 1 /2 0 0 2 report: December 2001 G roundw ater M onitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart and Dry Run Landfills DuPont 3 /2 0 0 2 report: January 2002 Surface W ater and Groundwater Monitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart and Dry Run Landfills DuPont 4 /2 0 0 2 report: February 2002 Surface W ater and Groundwater Monitoring Report for Washington Works Facility and Local, Letart and Dry Run Landfills Letter from DuPontdated 8 /3 1 /2 0 0 1 in response to USEPA Information Request Letter from DuPont to USEPA dated 1 1 /2 8 /2 0 0 1 Letter from Robert Bilott to USEPA IRIS Office dated 4 /1 2 /2 0 0 2 Page 98 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 325 of 326 PAGEID #: 40487 Descriptions of Documents Without Bates Numbers Various publicly-available documents, in addition to those listed above, which w ere obtained from state or federal agencies pursuant to FOIA/records requests, as well as pages printed from those agencies' websites Page 99 of 100 Case: 2:13-md-02433-EAS-EPD Doc #: 2702-3 Filed: 03/26/15 Page: 326 of 326 PAGEID #: 40488 Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits Timothy Bingman, taken in Leach v. DuPont case on 4/19/04 Glenn Evers, taken in Leach v. DuPont case on 4/30/04 Andrew Hartten, taken in Tennant v. DuPont case on 5/2/01 Andrew Hartten (2 vols.), taken in Rhodes v. DuPont case on 11/5/09 and 11/6/09 David Ramsey, taken in Little Hocking v. DuPont case on 11/15/12 Robert Ritchey, taken in Tennant v. DuPont case on 2/14/01 (no exhibits marked) Shane Snyder, taken in Rhodes v. DuPont case on 6/4/09 Shane Snyder, taken in Rowe v. DuPont case on 10/20/09 Dee Ann Staats (2 vols.), taken in Leach v. DuPont case on 6/6/02 and 6/7/02 James Cox (2 vols.), taken in Leach v. DuPont case on 3/30/04 and 3/31/04 Page 100 of 100