Document kmz0xJ6Zw63brzbx58KqO6OXD
The Wizards of Oops!
All those who believe we have our environmental problems under con
trol, raise your hands. Those with your hands up, please answer the fol
lowing questions: What kind of detergent should we be using? Can we
eat tuna fish without qualms? Is Lake Erie dead or alive? Do we continue
to use DDT in our gardens, or not?
Somehow, the on-again-off-again juggling act that has characterized
some of our environmental efforts allows the impression to get abroad
that we may not know what we're talking about. Any action taken to
limit an environmental hazard must include three steps: (1) Measure how
much of the dangerous material is in the air, or water, or soil, or what
ever. (2) Measure how much is a threat to human welfare, or crops, or
wildlife, or whatever. (3) Decide how much will be permitted. Each step
is fraught with science and politics, the road is dotted with pitfalls, and
the alluring shortcut can lead to strange territory.
ASTM feels no responsibility whatever for Step 3--that is primarily a
political decision. We have had thus far very little involvement with
Step 2--that is primarily a medical, or at least a biological, problem.
Step 1--measurement of the amount of questionable material in the
environment--is our bag. Therefore it should be a matter of great con
cern to us that the credibility gap in the area of test methods seems to be
as large as any other.
,
A recent newspaper article ("Scientific Tests: Can They Be Believed?")
appearing in the San Francisco Examiner makes the point. Wondering
about the accuracy of such tests, the newspaper hired three laboratories
to make identical measurements and compare results. The laboratories
measured the amounts of DDT, DDE, mercury, and lead in soil samples
taken from an apricot orchard near San Francisco. The results, in parts
per million, were reported as follows:
Laboratory 1 Laboratory 2 Laboratory 3
DDT
0.80 0.68 0.14
DDE
2.80 1.20 0.47
Mercury
0.80 0.10 0.10
Lead
3.30 21 50
These results are obviously unacceptable. They raise two immediate questions: (1) What went wrong? (2) Are these typical of the kinds of sampling and measurements that underlie the banning of fish from grocers' shelves, or the shutting down of industrial operations?
To ASTM, one conclusion is strong and clear: Wherever an ASTM test method is used for such measurements, we are responsible to see that it is the best method we can develop, and that the precision and accuracy of the method are known. In the field of air pollution, Project Threshold was launched with precisely that objective in mind. How many more Thresholds are needed?
| - 28
i
6
.
j
MATERIALS RESEARCH AND STANDARDS
DSW 588231 STLCOPCB4093567
Technical Committee 45, on Rubber and
Rubber Products, of the International Or
ganization for Standardization (ISO) cul
ISO/TC 45 on Rubberminated its most productive year with its
plenary meeting at ASTM Headquarters in Philadelphia in early October.
According to Dr. Robert D. Stiehler, of
October Meeting Highlights
the National Bureau of Standards, who
leads the U.S. delegation, the nineteenth
plenary meeting capped the committee's
most successful and productive year with
134 representatives attending, 96 of whom
were from countries other than the United
States. Additionally, the meeting attracted
observers from two countries which had
never before sent them: Indonesia and
Mexico.
Since the 1970 meeting, the Committee
on Rubber and Rubber Products has issued
43 ISO recommendations, and one revision
and one amendment of existing recom
mendations.
During the Philadelphia meeting the
members approved 20 additional docu
ments to be submitted to the ISO Council
for adoption as ISO Standards. After
pointing out that another 23 documents
are already awaiting issuance, Dr. Stiehler
predicted that all 43 should become ISO
Standards during the coming year.
Including the ISO recommendations previously issued, the Committee on Rub ber and Rubber Products has completed
Members of the Malaysian delegation to the International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee 45 on Rubber and Rubber Products, listen to a speaker at ASTM Headquarters where ISO met for its 19th plenary meeting during October. Some 134 representatives from 16 countries attended the meeting, capping ISO/TC 45's best year.
work on 118 separate documents, plus nine
revisions and amendments.
Two new working groups were approved
by the ISO members during the Phila
delphia meeting. One was formed from the task group on fabrics coated with rubber and plastics of Working Group II. The other will target on the action of flame on rubber and rubber products and will be organized during 1972. The convenorship of the working group on flexible cellular
materials was transferred from Germany to the United Kingdom.
Delegates and observers from 16 of the 25 participating countries sent repre sentatives to the 19th plenary sessions. The countries represented were Austria, Bel gium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, France,
ISO committee on rubber and rubber products, as in ISO as a whole, are starting to play on a world-wide scale the same role ASTM Standards play in the United States.
To increase the rate at which ISO docu ments may be produced for the interna tional market, ISO has modified its re
Germany, India, Italy, Malaysia, Nether lands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
quirements for establishing Standards. Previously, a single dissenting member
United Kingdom, and the United States of nation could prevent the adoption of an
America.
ISO recommendation as a Standard, and
The Association Internationale des Con- therefore no one attempted to make the
structeurs de Material Aerospatial, the In effort necessary to have the recom
ternational Institute of Synthetic Rubber mendations voted upon. From the incep
Products and the International Rubber tion of the technical committee on rubber
Research and Development Board also sent and rubber products in 1948, not one rec
observers to the meeting.
ommendation became a Standard.
Dr. Stiehler observed that the standard
However, in 1971 the International Or
documents developed in ISO/TC 45 are ganization for Standardization changed the
beginning to have a noticeable impact on requirement for a Standard from unani
international trade in rubber and rubber mous approval of its membership, to ap
products. Although the committee was proval by 75 percent of the membership.
Members of TechnicsI Committee 45, of the Interactional formed in 1948, there have simply not been As a result, some 43 recommendations
Organization tor Standardization, consider documents on Rubber and Rubber Products during that organization's plenary mealing In Philadelphia during October. They are
enough working standards available for the international industrial community to
written by TC 45 are being converted to ISO Standards in the coming year.
(ifrom right) IV. H. King, Vice-Chairman of ASTM Commit
guide itself until now, he said.
Although most of the activities of the
tee D-11; R. D. Stiehler, leader of the U.S. Delegation to
These first 20 years were just a prologue committee on rubber and rubber products
ISO/TC 45; three members of the delegation from the United Kingdom; and In the foreground (from left) an Interpreter; the chairman of the working group and another
to what the committee is beginning to accomplish now, according to Dr. Stiehler.
concerns the development of standard test methods, in the last year several materials
, German delegate.
The recommendations drawn up by the
(continued on page 48)
t-
1' JANUARY 1972
i
i
DSW 588232
`7
STLCOPCB4093568