Document kELBXwbk6QyEGNzkG8178Z5n
QUESTION AND ANSWER SHEET ON POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL
v >.. '.
This question and answer sheet, for verbal use only by Monsanto
personnel, is accompanied by our recent news release replying to
charges that PCB threatens the environment.
. .. ' '
_.
1. How was PCB first identified in the environment?
~.v Late in Feb., 1969, the San Francisco Chronicle carried
_ a major feature story about "a menacing new pollutant"
found in the San Francisco Bay area. The article was
' based on research done by Dr. Robert Risebrough of the
University of California. In his search for residues of
`. pesticides (DDT and DDE) he encountered "interfering
V substances."
:
'-'7:. . '
. :^
A few years prior to Dr. Risebrough*s work, two Swedish
scientists at Stockholm University's Institution of
Analytical Chemistry reported they, too, had encountered
these other substances. The Swedish scientists were able
to identify some of these materials as polychlorinated
v biphenyls or PCB. . . -' . .
,V:" .
J
.
Based upon this work, other scientists, in this country and throughout the world, have looked for and identified
-more-
DSW 329973
STLCOPCB4055882
They subsequently asked themselves two questions --
is PCB a threat to the environment, and, how is PCB
entering the environment?
-- -
Since PCBs are not broadcast or spread around the land,
as are pesticides, the scientists theorized the source
must be industrial wastes.
::\.r .--vi V.7 ' 7'
Monsanto Company has been in contact with many of these
scientists and agencies throughout the world. Monsanto
is as concerned as anyone about this potential problem.
We are continuing our own research programs as well as
cooperating fully with other studies.
.
.
Since Monsanto is the sole manufacturer of PCB in this
country (there are other producers, worldwide), it was
obvious from the beginning that we would be singled out
for criticism. '
'
' .7.;
...s
:
Is PCB as hazardous to the environment as recent charges
would indicate?
7, - - .
X.
The question of hazard to the environment is relative.
Some scientists have discovered it is harmful to certain
species of fish and birds. Whether it is harmful to man
is a question which is still under study.
':
v--/- -.;
. . ,:v : -more-
oS\n3*>974
STLCOPCB4055883
based upon technical bulletin toxicity descriptions and warning labels carried on shipping containers. These warnings are common throughout the industry. Users of industrial chemicals are accustomed to handling these materials with caution. As far as we know, at this time PCBs are not a threat to the world population.
What is Monsanto doing about this possible threat to the environment? (See attached news release.)
When the subject first came to our attention in 1968, we
began a six-point program. The program consists of:
A. Working with scientists around the world to
properly identify and measure PCB in the
environment. Our contacts have resulted in
meaningful exchanges of scientific data. This
effort has been directed toward locating the
source of PCB emissions
B... One possible source of PCB in the environment
'. could be from manufacturing facilities. For
this reason, we have been modernizing many of
our manufacturing techniques, installing new
pollution abatement devices and generally have
"tightened up" our plant techniques. -riiore-
D DSVV 329975 STLCOPCB4055884
Earlier this year, we alerted all our customers
to the possible threat posed to the environment
t>y PCB. At the same time, we offered our
technical services to assist them in the proper
handling, use and disposal of these products.
We have had under way for nearly a year toxiological
studies to determine the effect of higher
>
chlorinated hydrocarbons on animals. Early
results from these studies indicate PCB is not
highly toxic as has been charged.
;
We have also begun studies to.determine the
biodegradability of PCB. We have come to early
conclusions which indicate lower chlorinated
products are degraded in the environment. Higher
chlorinated substances do appear to resist degradation.
We are on the trail of some promising leads to
solve this problem.
::
Finally, we are working toward the introduction
of alternate products which will be either new
formulations or rapidly degrading compounds which
retain the functional characteristic of PCB but
pose no threat to the environment.
. . -more-
--
. -"
.
' :' ; ' . ' ".
;
DSW 329976
STLCOPCB4055885
Is the public in any immediate danger?
It is our opinion that the public is not faced with
any immediate danger to its health from PCBs. . Contrary
to the sensational headlines of recent days, PCB is not
commonly found around the household.
' ' -V
The major market for PCB-containing products is in electrical equipment. It is alsp used in closed system heat-transfer applications. The "plasticizer" uses are very limited and are restricted to specialty products.
Since PCB does linger in the environment and could be
a long-term threat similar to DDT, should it not be
banned?
.
.\
`
Monsanto Company and the electrical industry believe
these products are so vital to our society that they
should not be banned. One major electrical equipment
manufacturer has told us that a ban on the use of PCB-
containing products would mean major power failures
throughout the world. We believe that strict control
over the use and disposal of PCB, and substitution in
uses that cannot be controlled, is the answer to this
problem. We are working toward this solution.
-more-
'
.. . ;
DSW 329977
If PCB is only used in specialized or "closed systems",
why would Monsanto publish a bulletin which said PCB is
used in many other ways?
..
v.
Our bulletin 0/PL-306, referred to in recent publicity,
was first published in 1960 when there was no evidence
that PCB could be a threat to the environment. When
the possible threat was brought to our attention two
years ago, we discontinued circulation of the bulletin.
The bulletin was designed to be a "sales tool." It had many suggested applications in order to increase our sale of these chemicals. Monsanto is not unique in this marketing approach. To our knowledge, PCB has never been used in all these applications as has been charged.
Where does Monsanto produce its Aroclor products?
Monsanto produces Aroclor products containing PCB at
its William G. Krummrich Plant, Sauget, 111., and its
Anniston, Ala., plant.
/:
. .
How long has the company produced these chemicals?
About 40 years.
'
. -
".
... ' v.. ... -more-
.'
. . .
.
DSW 329978
STLCOPCB4055887
How much PCB has been produced? . . .. ;
; '^
Monsanto's production figures are confidential and
will be released only to the appropriate governmental
agencies.
_ -'
-0O0-
-' : ' " ' V '
DSW 329979
STLCOPCB4055888