Document kDKQLb7068ZRVmRo1rk0Y8Keq

FILE NAME: Union Carbide (UC) DATE: 1962 May DOC#: UC341 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Industrial Hygiene Article - A Toxicologist's View of Threshold Limits lo catio n : NLM014699926 I <3 r f ) h1- ?, ' CO ' rj -X) CL -'X0>) ; >cov ! E >*co co 5 t>r* . CO Am e r ic a n ? "O- Industrial Hygiene ASSOCIATION c o n a5 CO E o V O L U M E 23, N U M B E R I January-February, 1962 American Industrial Hygiene Conference Park-Sheraton Hotel, Washington, D. C . M a y 13-17, 1962 -----Location Barcode : ju A o r : G e n e ra l C o u e c w u u N L M O 14699926 and another step forward lblisher, with a new printer, pcrienced in the printing of oard to select a new printer miles apart, and has toiled ning job quite separate from nittee assignments, like this nembers. ages-- yes, b u t m ore im port- ationally, as the outstanding 1200 members, but almost :rs. I t is thus im portant to se in our organization, the . Like all superior scientific ractice of binding and filing the aim of A IH A from its uary 1940 the first quarterly idustrial Medicine. Clarence ivities, was chairm an of the r the chairmanship of Hal together a remarkably inter hygiene, . was directly appointed editor held this assignment. U nder .tion (June 1946) in its long ba rre n 's term of office, but tany competent editors, and o 1953. T hen came former Plications Committee. Herb making our current change ar later the next change in rard Schulz skillfully guided Association owes these seven success with which members s have brought in and con y years assistance was given ;d the burden of this, their the bimonthly Journal, and aid of format has made, and ces the future, shoulder to George R eichenbach's Con- ised a t w hat is planned for iful in May, with lots to do. / ,, /y ^ / A AMERICAN Industrial Hygiene a s s o c i a T I o N Journal Volume 23 January-February, 1962 Number I ~ table of contents C h a n g in g O b j e c t i v e s i n O c c u p a t io n a l H e a l t h ............................................... . Theodore Hatch I / N e w C o n c e p t s a n d F u t u r e T r e n d s i n T o x ic o l o g y ...................................... Herbert E. Stokinger 20 M odern C o n c epts o f A ir Sa m plin g and P roblem s for t h e u t ..... M o d er n ' C o n c e pt * o f A nalytical C h e m ist r y in I n d u stria l H y g ie * e ^ P r o b l e m s f o r t h e F u t u r e ...................................................................................... M odern' C o n c e p t s o f D ia g n o sis a n d T r e a t m e n t in O c c u pa tio n a l M ed ic in e M itchell R. Zavon, M .D . A T o x ic o l o g is t 's V i e w o f T h r e s h o l d L i m i t s ............................................... ............... D 26 30 37 A ccepta ble C o n c en t r a t io n s: T h e ir D e fin i- ^ T, Ni r DJ r r r X ^ C o m m ittee, A m erican Conference of G overnm ental Industrial H ygienis^ A n I m p r o v e d C o n t in u o u s I n t e r n a l - E l e c t r o l y s is A n a l y z e r p o r G a s e o u s 48 F l u o r id e s i n I n d u s t r ia l E n v i r o n m e n t s ......................................................... O. H . H oward, A.B ., and C. W . W eber, Ph.D. 58 S e p a r a t io n a n d A n a l y s is o f D u s t i n L u n g T i s s u e .................................... V A. Talvitie and Lial W . Brewer 62 I n -S e r v ic e S o l v e n t C l e a n in g o f E l e c t r ic M o t o r s ................................... D. L . Stoddard and W . R . Wells 67 D u s t C o n t r o l i n t h e A s b e s t o s T e x t il e I n d u s t r y ................................... Benjamin F. Postman, M .E. 75 U se o f St a t ist ic a l M eth o d o l o g y in E n v ir o n m en ta l M o nitorin c. Gerald W . Kerr 83 P l a n n in g V e n t i l a t i o n f o r N u c l e a r R e a c t o r F a c i l it ie s ........................ Bruce J. __ At m o s p h e r e C o n t a in in g C a r b o n A Sy ste m fo r E x po su r e o f M ice to an 88 P articles Eric G. Comstock, Roger R. R ue, and J. H. Gast g[ N ew s of L ocal Se c tio n s. P r e s id e n t ' s P a g e .. . A-2 American I ndustrial H ygiene VH25r prevost^Sb e t r o itt 2 7 , M ichigan. T hej^ T w ^ p u r c h a s e d Fro$m ffie P t o s s office, p e r - p y in U.S ,A ; " M n fc o p y ' Congress C atalogue N o. 57-3191. J t^ th ^ a d o p te d * by the Assoc,anon. Library of ______________ _____________ Printed for the American Industrial Hygiene Association by THE BRUCE PUBLISHING COMPANY, SAINT PAUL 14, MINNESOTA inuary-February, 1962 tment in occupational d remarkably in recent ;ntals of diagnosis and ally changed at all. As ices, it carries occupat, yet this specialty has to contribute in the ves its special problems, affect such a large prolfully employed adult becoming more conand comparatively less imical change. We are c in our diagnostic techleously depending more ithods to indicate the >f effect. Diagnosis and lecialty have advanced :ss we can train pracogical terms, future ad ; and starts rather than -ont. Lasser, a n d H . L . H ealthy Aged 65 to 106 Y ears. 1 M ed . 94: 463 (1957); M aster, md H . H . Marks: T he Normal and Its Clinical Implications. 143; 1464 (1950). ,, ,, . O sol (E d ito rs): N ew Gould =Graw H ill Book C om pany, In c ., M . Sc h u m a n : "Silo-FiH er's Caused by N itrogen Dioxide. 162: 153 (1956). H . Jones, and J . R- Brown After Exposure to an Ester ot Acid. ] A m er. M e d . Assoc. 171: ion: A case of supposed organic t with perm anent neurological ity. Scientific A m erican 183: 44 he Present Evolution of M an. 3: 206 (Sept. I960). ngeRj and J . P h'air: R adiation islicd. f creasing Clinical Significance ol es of Body Fluids. A nn. ln t. .d Cholinesterase Activity. A M A 403 (1957) r , JAM. F . M yers, C . Sheba, and latoloeical Survey of Industrial ic-Deficicnt Erythrocytes. A M A - 510 (1959). , ., A Gilman. T he Pharmacological 2nd Ed. T he M acm illan Co., Iraki PAM fP yridine-2-A ldoxim e for Alkyl Phosphate Poisoning. 166: 1834 (1958). A Toxicologist's View of Threshold Limits HENRY F^SMYTH, JR., Ph.D. Mellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Jg Conformance with a threshold limit may lead to more absorption of vapor than oes conformance with a numerically identical maximal acceptable concentration, because the former is a time-weighted average concentration', while the latter is a limit below which all measurements should fall. The adverse effects which threshold limits are expected to guard against may not include cortical reflexes. Whether or not such reflex effects are of any importance to the well-being of the industrial worker is not completely clear. I AM on record1 as concluding that experi mental study of the effects of repeated inhalation by animals has been as sound a basis for setting threshold limits as any other basis which has been used for the values of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). A consider able proportion of the values set on any basis has been modified later as experience has accumulated, and the proportion has been no greater for those based on experimental toxicology than for other bases. It is the collection of experience through industrial hygienists and industrial physicians, with annual reconsideration of values, which has made the threshold limits lists dependable. However, some details arc suggested by toxicological considerations. All that I have to say is related to the paragraph which has been used for several years as part of the foreword to the annual tables of threshold limits issued by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.2I quote: a normal workday. The amount by which these figures may be exceeded for short periods without injury to health depends upon a number of factors, such as the nature of the contaminant, whether very high concentrations even for short periods produce acute poisoning, whether the effects are cumulative, the frequency with which high concentrations occur, and the duration of such periods. All must be taken into consideration in arriving at a decision as to whether a hazardous situa tion exists. Special consideration should be given to the application of these values in the evaluation of the health hazards which may be associated with exposure to combinations of two or more substances." I shall discuss points suggested by three phrases from the quoted paragraph: "The time-weighted average concentra tion," "The amount by which these figures may be exceeded," and "Without adverse effect," "Threshold limits should be used as and follow with a brief summary of our own guides in the control of health hazards and exploration of the conditioned reflex, which should not be regarded as fine lines be leads out of my discussion of the third phase. tween safe and dangerous concentrations. They represent conditions under which it "Time-Weighted Average Concentrations" is believed that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed day after day, without The Maximal Acceptable Concentrations adverse effect. The values listed refer to (MAC's) of the American Standards Associa time-weighted average concentrations for tion Z-37 Committee, are authoritative This paper was .presented at the T e n th A nnual Conference opinions, which are not widely referred to. r i of th e Pennsylvania D epartm ent of H ealth, University Park, Pennsylvania, on A ugust 23, 1961. In the mid 1950's the Z-37 Committee 37 i-i r-rmATT l I LIBRARY O f ME 38 ]anu ary-Febru ary, 1962 I co If l W i iA ' *V i lllBRARY OF ME l\ i |JO A a V U B Il IV s | \ I ATM 1\ ^ U g ^-2! , " i I llB R A R Y OF ME : r sr v / ? l * N Ji i IBRARY OF M i 1 '"&ryt | .. I !:;! k! 1l!' BRARY OF ME undertook to review and to revise earlier standards which it had issued, and to extend the rather brief list to include additional industrial materials. This large Committee, operating under the awkward rule of con sensus, with some members unable to vote until official action of their societies has in structed them, has made less than moderate progress. Since 1957 four standards have been issued, Carbon Tetrachloride,8 Ben zene,4 Toluene5 and Xylene.9 The numerical values of these MAC's are identical with the 1960 Threshold Limits Values of the ACGIH, namely 25, 25, 200, and 200 parts per million by volume (ppm) respectively.2 The agreement is much less than one would think from the correspondence of the numerical values. This is an illustration of the weakness of quoting numbers divorced from their context. The threshold limit values refer to time-weighted average con centration for a normal work day, as ex plained in the paragraph I quoted. On the other hand, the maximal accept able concentrations of the Z-37 Committee refer to that concentration which should not be exceeded at any time during a normal work day. MAC's are peak concentrations, not averages. The Carbon Tetrachloride standard reads 25 ppm, "with the under standing that variations should fluctuate around 10 ppm."3 If this standard is followed literally, the time-weighted average will be in the neighborhood of 10 ppm, only 40% of the threshold limit. The Xylene standard reads 200 ppm, "with the understanding that variations in concentration should fluctuate below this level."5 Here again, a person working in the MAC conceivably could ab sorb about half as much as if he were working in the threshold limit concentration. Thus the numerical identity of the stand ards of MAC and TL for four vapors, actually mean that the Z-37 Committee con cludes that the exposures of workmen should be considerably less than those which the ACGIH Committee concludes are unlikely to cause adverse effect. The question of which concept is sound, average, or maximum, requires some con sideration of the type of injuries against which the standards guard, and of the toxico logical mechanisms which cause these in juries. I made a special study of this subject in 1956/ and concluded that the injuries guarded against varied widely I urged that some clue to the type of injury be included in tabulations of standards. Injuries are ex plicitly described in ASA Standards and in American Industrial Hygiene Association I Hygienic Guides, but not in any tabulations! I have seen published. Indeed, ASA has set the precedent of naming two standards for inhalation of one substance, to guard against two kinds of injury. In effect, the Xylene Standard5 says, "T o guard against discomfort to workmen, keep concentrations below 50 ppm, and to guard against narcosis and anemia, keep concentrations below 200 ppm." My 1956 paper7 concluded that the 238 ACGIH threshold limits und tentative threshold limits then extant guarded against nine different adverse effects. 1. Twelve per cent guarded against acute systemic toxicity. With these, the total amount absorbed in one day usually deter mines whether injury results, and the timeweighted average concentration is an appro priate guide to safe working conditions. Among the exceptions may be the cyanides, whose detoxication in the body is so rapid that the average during a briefer period, or even the instantaneous peak, is more im portant. 2 Thirty-three per cent guarded against chronic, toxicity. With these, the total amount absorbed during several days or even weeks determines whether injury results, and the. time-weighted aveiage concentration is an appropriate guide to safety. 3. Twenty-three per cent guarded against narcosis. The degree of narcosis in a subject varies with the concentration in the fluid bathing certain colls in the central nervous system, and this is quickly responsive to the concentration being inhaled The timeweighted average concentration is useless to judge safety. The concentration being breathed should never exceed some particular value, regardless of the day's average. 4. Twenty'-six per cent guarded against January-February, 19621 Hard, and of the toxico-. which cause these in-1 ial study of this subject uded that the injuries d widely. I urged that s of injury be included dards. Injuries are ex^SA Standards and in Hygiene Association not in any tabulations . Indeed, ASA has set ling two standards for tance, to guard against In effect, the Xylene tard against discomfort ncentrations below 50 against narcosis and itions below 200 ppm." ncluded that the 238 imits and tentative xtant guarded against effects. guarded against acute th these, the total ne day usually deter'esults, and the timentration is an approworking conditions, may be the cyanides, the body is so rapid > a briefer period, or peak, is more im- :ent guarded against 8 h these, the total several days or even er injury results, and Jge concentration is safety. cent guarded against narcosis in a subject tration in the fluid the central nervous ly responsive to the haled. The timeitration is useless to concentration being ceed some particular lay's average, nt guarded against Industrial Hygiene Journal 39 uncomfortable but not harmful irritation of the eye, nose, or throat. Clearly, for these, the instantaneous concentration is useful for guarding comfort; the daily average is not useful; and neither has much bearing on safety. 5. Six standards are for asphyxiants, but these threshold limits are standards of good practice, so far below a truly injurious con centration that there is no need to debate which form of standard is the more sound. 6. Three standards guarded against fume fever. The total amount in the lung at any one time is the significant quantity. Lung clearance seems to proceed so quickly that the average concentration in an hour is more significant than that in a day, and a standard based on a maximum in the air seems a sounder index of safety. 7. Two standards guarded against eye pigmentation, more a cosmetic defect than an interference with vision. This condition develops slowly over a very long period, and the time-weighted average seems a sound control. 8. Two standards guarded against allergic sensitization. With these it is possible that no concentration can be set to which some previously sensitized person will not react. Hence, the standards could well be a form of zero, the smallest amount which can be analytically estimated. The nature of the most sensitive practical analytical method should determine which form of standard is the better. 9. One standard guarded against cancer. We know so little about the causation of cancer by most substances that it may be prudent to limit the concentration to a form of zero, the. smallest amount which can be analytically estimated. The nature of the most sensitive practical analytical method should determine which form of standard is better. For fifty per cent of the substances listed in 1956, I found that the ASA Maximal Acceptable Concentration concept of an in stantaneous or peak concentration was the sounder protection against adverse effect, while the ACGIH Threshold Limit concept of a maximum time-weighted-average con centration over one working day was ade quate protection in forty-six per cent of the standards. Since an excessive time-weighted average is impossible if a well-chosen maxi mum instantaneous concentration is never exceeded, I see no need for the concept of an average to protect health. However, I recognize that the requirements of many sampling and analtyical methods make it more practical to determine conformance with an average over an appreciable period than to determine conformance with a maximum. Developments in analytical in strumentation are reducing the relative con venience of a standard for average concentra tions, and in some instances make the average very cumbersome to determine. In summary, when Z-37 and ACGIH standards for inhalation are numerically identical, conformance with the Z-37 stand ard results in absorption of less toxicant than does conformance with the ACGIH standard. For about half the substances listed the ACGIH concept is physiologically wrong. The Z-37 concept, while likewise physio logically wrong for half the substances in the ACGIH list, errs on the side of safety. Health would be more consistently protected if all standards were written in terms of maximum peak concentration during a working day, rather than in terms of the time-weighted average throughout the day. "The Amount by Which These Figures M ay Be Exceeded" The ACGIH Committee contemplates that some operations will be conducted in con centrations above the threshold limit for brief periods, for they devote an entire sentence to suggesting the pertinent factors to be con sidered. Many industrial hygienists are quali fied to interpret these pertinent factors for specific substances. Many others, including even lawyers, may blindly rely upon the threshold limits as averages of exposures to unlimited peak concentrations, and this reliance may result in harm to those exposed. How can the Threshold Limits Committee better guard against such misinterpretation? It seems to be practically impossible to L IB R A R Y O P M f i{! ' y fI ^ I i O ABVH9I1 1V11 * v[<J IBRARY OP M8 > I. I* O A 8 V 8 9 I1 IV 4/^;' I. ^-{p\ iI;'is BRARY OF M i `j d Avan iv. 5RARY OF M| ? ^ :] . ^ n j i !; *< , a r > i * ' ^ S j; ) Aavasn n '* MiSf RARY OF ME 1 !, A avsail Hj 1 40 January-February, 1962 conduct some industrial operations without exposing workmen to concentrations above the threshold limit. When the particular sub stance has a threshold limit which guards against acute toxicity, such as that for arsine, workmen may be seriously injured by rela tively brief peak exposures. .The operation should be fully automated, or if a workman must be present, adequate personal protection must be provided, maintained, and con sistently used. When the substance has a threshold limit which guards against eye, nose, and throat irritation and is far below an injurious concentration, such as acetalde hyde, exposures well above the threshold limit can have no effect except to produce complaints from workmen, and some work men will perceive no discomfort. It ought to be possible to agree upon the penalty to health which may be exacted if a threshold limit is exceeded, even continually, and to indicate this in tabulations, as a guide to the solution of problems where operations under the limit are impractical. It is very difficult to find this information in the litera ture, partly because the bases for threshold limit values have not been explicitly stated by the AGGIH Committee until very recently. "W ithout Adverse Effect" The threshold limits values are stated to be guides to conditions under which it is be lieved that nearly all workers may be re peatedly exposed without adverse effects, and they are not fine lines between safe and dan gerous conditions. Hence most industrial hy gienists do not lose faith in the soundness of the values when they learn that every year a few are changed, usually downwards, as a re sult of industrial experience which comes to the attention of the Committee. However, seiious uncertainty was evoked several years ago when it was rumored that values enforced in Russia are in some instances one-tenth or less of the ACGIH values. It was obvious that such a difference could be due only to a difference in concept of what the values should accomplish, because it is thoroughly demonstrated in American industry that guidance by the ACGIH values results in safe working conditions. Nevertheless, lack of in formation fostered doubts. In this country the Russian values for con centrations of contaminants in the working environment first became generally known and debated following the X II International Congress on Occupational Health in Helsinki in 1957. The paper by Smeljansky8 was par ticularly noteworthy, stating that the concen trations considered safe, and enforced in Rus sian industry, are lower than in the United States for a number of vapors. The basis for the values was stated to be experimental studies using the Pavlov conditioned reflex technique. Elkins9 has recently compared the values used in Russia and in the United States, grouping the substances by nature of action, chemical structure, or physical form. In some categories he finds agreement to be good, in others the Russian values are slightly lower than ours, in still others they are one-tenth or less of ours. He states that where agree ment is least, the Russian values are said to be based on conditioned reflex studies with animals. It is now possible to scrutinize the details of the bases for some of the Russian values, and to infer something of the philosophy under which they have been set, through the translations by B. S. Levine, made avail able by a Public Health Service Research G ra n t.10'11'12'13'14'15'115 The experimental methods which form the bases for the few values I shall discuss, are described in Book 3, pages 102-128, which is the third (1957) report of the U.S.S.R. Com mittee on the Determination of Limits of Al lowable Concentrations of Atmospheric Pol lutants.12 This Committee deals with atmos pheres outside of work places, but the meth ods it describes seem to be the same as those relied upon for industrial exposures. Apparently only six experimental methods are employed. Odor and mucous membrane (eyelid) irritation is a considerably refined method for an estimate of the aggressive characteristics of substances. Less accurate estimates of these characteristics have been much relied upon for setting ACGIH thres hold limits.7 The Russian method uses ten human subjects, analytically verified concen trations, and several days working time for IndustrialJ each substal fled with "o b je c tio n ^ tration, as ii concentratiof from pure is used for I The othe| thesis that sd the sympathi the cerebrall tions can bl phenomena a the substance^ The pneuf the thesis thj self against when they Sympathetic; bral cortex tion by causa volume, a n d f cuff over th e ! human subject utes inhalatiol stance, then tration which*! tion is the th rl in setting star ject is conscibl inhaled. The piethys| the same thesj flex here is al striction, detec of a finger. The optical) the thesis th a t: ters, even w h | cause a sympatl lying nearby elapsed time isf a second, betwf human eyelid, luminosity. Irrifa1 reduces this time. S for training three \ tests of chronaxy re periods of inhalatio tions, to determine tl tration. A R Y K S Il January-February, 1962 Russian values for conninants in the working :came generally known g the X II International ional Health in Helsinki by Smeljansky8 was par stating that the concen- | fe, and enforced in Rus- | ver than in the United of vapors. The basis for 1 ed to be experimental | .vlov conditioned reflex | g9 ly compared the values g in the United States, * ces by nature of action, | physical form. In some J freement to be good, in I alues are slightly lower ;j hers they are one-tenth f itates that where agree- j issian values are said to i' >ned reflex studies with to scrutinize the details 3 2 of the Russian values, ^ ling of the philosophy ^ lave been set, through ' S. Levine, made avail- ; ealth Service Research 3 nethods which form the \ lues I shall discuss, are pages 102-128, which is ; -it of the U.S.S.R. Com- lination of Limits of Al- ns of Atmospheric Pol nittee deals with atmos- k places, but the meth- to be the same as those trial exposures. . x experimental methods ' and mucous membrane a considerably refined , nate of the aggressive ^stances. Less accurate < laracteristics have been ' r setting ACGIH thresussian method uses ten ytically verified concen- : days working time for i Industrial Hygiene Journal 41 each substance. The Russians are not satis fied with the subjective evaluation of the "objectionable" characteristics of a concen tration, as is done in this country. The lowest concentration which can be distinguished from pure air by any one of the ten subjects is used for setting a standard. The other five methods depend on the thesis that substances have an initial effect on the sympathetic nervous system, producing in the cerebral cortex reflex processes whose ac tions can be most sensitively detected by phenomena not part of the direct action of the substance. The pneumographic method depends on the thesis that the body tends to defend it self against objectionable substances, even when they are not consciously perceived. Sympathetic reflexes mediated by the cere bral cortex respond to odor and nasal irrita tion by causing changes' in respiratory rate, volume, and rhythm. By means of a rubber cuff over the thorax, the respiration of a few human subjects is followed during a few min utes inhalation of a concentration of a sub stance, then of pure air. The lowest concen tration which produces a difference in respira tion is the threshold of effect to be considered in setting standards, whether or not the sub ject is conscious that the substance is being inhaled. The plethysmographic method depends on the same thesis of a defense reflex. The re flex here is a change in blood vessel con striction, detected by changes in the volume of a finger. The optical chronaxy method depends on the thesis that irritation of the olfactory cen ters, even when not consciously perceived, cause a sympathetic irritation in optic centers lying nearby in the cerebral cortex. The elapsed time is measured, in thousandths of a second, between electrical stimulation of a human eyelid, and perception of an illusion of luminosity. Irritation from inhaled material reduces this time. Several days are required for training three human subjects, and for tests of chronaxy resulting from five-minute periods of inhalation of various concentra tions, to determine the least effective concen tration. The adaptometric test depends on the same thesis of irritation of the optic center, sym pathetic to irritation of the olfactory center. I t measures the sensitivity to light of trained human subjects, when breathing vapors for fifteen-minute periods after an hour of adap tation of the eye to darkness. The eye is more sensitive when a vapor is being inhaled, whether or not the subject is aware of the inhalation. The sixth test is the conditioned reflex de termination in rats. It is the only one which is designed to produce chronic toxic effects. It seems to depend on the thesis that activa tion of any sympathetic reflex decreases the ability of the cerebral cortex to carry out con ditioned reflex actions. I t requires several weeks for training. Rats are trained to reach for food as a reflex response to a bell and to a colored light, but to avoid reaching when a buzzer sounds. By a complex scheduling of these events, one classifies the central nervous activity of the trained rats as to strong and weak, balanced and unbalanced, and uses some of each type in each experimental group. The trained rats are subjected to six months of daily inhalations of a substance. Every day their reflexes are tested, recording the time lapse between the signal and the learned response. At the end of six months one can judge which of the concentrations tested resulted in no change in reflexes, and which produced minimum changes. Some rats are sacrificed at once for tissue study, others are kept for thirty days to judge re covery of their reflex behavior, then tissues are studied. The entire study on one sub stance requires almost a year. By relying upon the results of these six tests, the Russians indicate their belief that people should not be subjected to inhalation of a substance at a concentration which re sults in any detectable physiological response. They may feel that if there is such a re sponse, a lifetime of exposure may result in injury, impairment of function, disability. I have seen no evidence that experience in in dustry plays any part in setting their stand ards. O ur feeling has been that people should not be subjected to inhalation which they find consciously objectionable, or which is likely to lead to disability or suffering. Since - ` M i l D A 8 V 8 9 H IV |j. BRARY OF M i JRARY OF Mj i !, i' 42 January-February, 1962 the concepts of what the standards are ex pected to guard against are so widely dif ferent, it should not be surprising that values for specific substances may be widely dif ferent. Experience under standards based upon our concept, during almost twenty years, gives us confidence that we are pro tecting health. A review of some of the few available pub lications of Russian experimental work may be informative. In 1956 Novikov published the experimental work on benzene, upon which the Russian standard seems to be based (Reference 14, p. 185). He considers that the blood-cell changes we see from ben zene may be secondary effects of sympathetic disturbances in that part of the central nervous system which regulates the hemo poietic system. He appears to believe that disturbances in the central nervous system which he detects by behavioral changes in conditioned rats, parallel the disturbances which affect the hemopoietic system, and that the only way to prevent blood-cell changes is to keep concentrations too low to affect be havior. At 20 ppm benzene he finds changes in conditioned reflex behavior, most marked in rats of weak, and of unbalanced strong, higher nervous activity.' At. 4 ppm he finds no effect.. Those who have utilized his re sults seem to feel that there is no difference between human and rat sensitivity to this central nervous system effect, for Elkins9 re ports that the Russian MAC for benzene is 6 ppm. This is to be compared with the ACGIH figure of 25 ppm,2 based on long industrial experience.7 In 1957 Borisova published experimental work on dichloroethane, upon which the Russian standard seems to be based (Refer ence 15, p. 110). Using humans, he found that the threshold for increased sensitivity to light, respiratory changes, and constriction of capillaries was 1.5 ppm, below the odor thres hold, while 1.0 ppm had none of these effects. Elkins9 reports that the Russian MAC for dichloroethane is 2.5 ppm. This is to be com pared with the ACGIH figure of 100 ppm,2 based on animal experiment, human experi ence, and analogy with carbon tetrachloride, but not revised to allow for more recent views about the latter substance.7 In 1958 Melekhina published the experi mental work on formaldehyde, upon which the Russian standard seems to be based (Reference 15, p. 135). Using humans, the time to perceive a sensation of light as a re sult of electrical stimulation of the eyelid, was reduced by 0.07 ppm formaldehyde, and not affected by 0.03 ppm, while the threshold of odor was 0.06 ppm. Elkins9 reports that the Russian MAC for formaldehyde is 0.08 ppm. This is to be compared with the ACGIH figure of 5 ppm,2 based on com plaints of workmen in industry.7 Our Exploration of Conditioned Reflex About eighteen months ago, my group set out to explore the utility of the conditioned reflex technique, with much less knowledge of the Russian methods than we now have. A manuscript describing our first results is in press,17 and a research grant for further work in methodology has been authorized by the National Institutes of Health (OH-16). There are American reports of one middleaged woman18 and two young adult males13 who worked for several weeks in noticeably high, but unmeasured concentrations of mixed vapors containing the monomethyl ether of ethylene glycol (methyl cellosolve solvent). The three were incapacitated, with headache, drowsiness, forgetfulness, and dis orientation, diagnosed as "toxic encephalo pathy," and attributed to inhalation of methyl cellosolve. The workers returned to normal after a few weeks of rest in a hospital, with out other therapy. A survey of one establish ment using the same mixed solvent in the same way, found eight of nineteen workers with non-disabling symptoms suggesting the same injury.20 Because of these observations, several attempts were made to produce such symptoms in animals.21'22'23 The symptoms were not found, but no specialized behavioral techniques were used at that time. This recorded experience suggested methyl cellosolve as a useful substance for explora tory studies of the utility of the conditioned reflex technique. We asked ourselves if such symptoms in over-exposed humans would have been predicted had behavioral studies been understood and applied before methyl Industrial Hm cellosolve wa the threshold now is. With no ods, we train ance response climbed a pa received an the floor whe| Inhalation! hours daily f | ber of rats w | heard the bu tration all ra | the electric reduced the j them able to 9 ber of rats a l of inhalation! mum by foul minimal at 11 threshold Hi for fourteen'! turned to the retraining. Contrasted^ cellosolve, etf havioral ch a| which caused! This explof) flex methods 1 Russian metha concentration! threshold limlj been attributl arising in the j Summary Experience limits based with animals ' Despite the! only as guides,! rating safe fro f consideration Id tion the number particular the timetration is physiologi of the limits, and c posures. If the thn maximum concentr n m n m rm n m in i muary-Fcbruary, 1962 I published the experi aldehyde, upon which . seem s to h e based ). Using humans, the sation of light as a re la tio n of the eyelid, pm formaldehyde, and >m, while the threshold l. Elkins9 reports that formaldehyde is 0.08 : compared with the ppm,2 based on coml industry.2 Conditioned Reflex nths ago, my group set ility of the conditioned i much less knowledge is than we now have. A ; our first results is in i grant for further work Deen authorized by the Health (OH-16), l reports of one middlevo young adult males'9 ral weeks in noticeably red concentrations of ining the monomethyl ycol (methyl cellosolve vere incapacitated, with . forgetfulness, and disd as "toxic encephaloi to inhalation of methyl :ers returned to normal rest in a hospital, with- survey of one establishe mixed solvent in the ;ht of nineteen workers ymptoms suggesting the ;Se of these observations, e made to produce such s 2i,22,23 -phe symptoms no specialized behavioral 1 at that time, erience suggested methyl 1 substance for exploraitility of the conditioned e asked ourselves if such xposed humans would 1 had behavioral studies d applied before methyl 43 Industrial Hygiene Journal cellosolve was first used industrially, and if the threshold limit would be lower than it now is. . , With no knowledge of the Russian meth ods we trained rats in a conditioned avoid ance response. At the sound of a buzzer, they climbed a pole, because originally they had received an electric shock while standing on the floor when the buzzer sounded. Inhalation of methyl cellosolve for four hours daily for several days reduced the num ber of rats which climbed the pole when they heard the buzzer, but up to a lethal concen tration all rats were able to climb when given the electric shock. Inhalation of the vapors reduced the effect of conditioning, but left them able to climb to escape pain. The num ber of rats affected increased with the days during the working day, the substances for which this is physiologically wrong, would be controlled by a conservative standard. Tables of threshold limits would be more useful if they indicated the injury which could result from a small excess, in order to guide the management of exposures where full conformance is impossible. The philosophy of the Russian maximum allowable concentrations seems to be that workmen should not be exposed to any con centration which produces a detectable physi ological response, with no consideration as to whether such a response is harmful. An exploratory study of the conditioned re flex behavioral technique indicates that the method may detect effects which other toxic ological methods do not suggest. - ipl -i u of inhalation, but seemed to reach a maxi mum by fourteen days. The effect seemed References minimal at 125 ppm, five times the ACGiH threshold limit.2 Some rats, allowed to rest for fourteen days without inhalation, re turned to the conditioned behavior without 1. S m y t h , H . F . Jr .: T h e Toxicological B aus of Threshold Lim it Values. I. Experience with Threshold Lim it Values Based on Animal D ata. Am er. Ind. riyR. Assoc. J . 20 : 341 (O ct. 1959). 2 A C G IH : T hreshold Lim it Values for 1960. A M A Arch, o f E n v ir. H ea lth . 1 : 140 (A ug. 1960). retraining. Contrasted with the behavior of methyl cellosolve, ethyl alcohol produced no such be 3. ASA: A m erica n Standard M a xim u m Acceptable C on centration o f C arbon T etrachloride. \m e r . Stds. Assoc., New York (Jan . 15, 1957). 4. ASA: American Standard M aximal Acceptable Concentralion o f B enzene. A m er. Stds. Assoc., N ew Yorlc havioral change short of a concentration which caused frank depression and ataxia. This exploratory work, by conditioned re flex methods possibly less sensitive than the Russian methods, does not show an effective concentration lower than the current ACGiH threshold limit, with a vapor to which has been attributed transient human disability arising in the central nervous system. (O ct. 28, 1960). 5 ASA: American Standard M aximal Acceptable C on n ' tration of Toluene. A m er. Stds. Assoc., New York (O ct. 28, 1960). 6 ASA: American Standard M axim al Acceptable Concen- ' trailon o f X ylen e. A m er. Stds. Assoc., New York (O ct. 28, 1960). . . 7. S m y t h , H . F ., J r.: Im proved G om m u m ^ o n --Hygienic S tandards fo r D aily In h alatio n . A m er. I n d . H yi: Assoc. Q uart. 17: 129 (J u n e 1956). 8. Smeljansky, S. B : H ygienische B egrndung d e r , m ativvorschnften Bezglich maxiinal-zulassigcr trationen toxischer Stoffe in d e r L uit der B etnebsraum e Proceedings of theX U International Congress o* O ccupational H ea lth , V ol. I l l , p . '10, H elsinki (1957). Summary Experience in this country with threshold 9 F l k iNS I I . B .: M axim um Allowable C oncentrations. A 9 Compan.son in Russia and the U nited States. A M A Arch. Enuir. H ealth. 2 : 45 (Jan. 1961). _ to. LPiomlliuttsantosf BAololokwa1b, le195C2.oncVe.ntAra.tioRnysazaonfov sitEmdoistoprh,erBw. S Levine, Translator U . S. Department o( Commerce. limits based upon toxicological experiment with animals has been good. Office of Technical Services, W ashington 25. n . c (59-21173). 11 L im its o f Allow able , ,, ... C oncentrations o f A,l n,.s^ ` r^ Despite the fact that the limits are used only as guides, and are not sharp lines sepa rating safe from injurious atmospheres, more Office of Technical Services, W ashington 25, D . c . (59-21174). , , ... 12 L im its of Allow able C oncentrations of A `X t.?s^ er^ consideration should be given to the condi tion the numbers are meant to represent. In particular the time-weighted average concen tration is physiologically wrong for about half of the limits, and can result in injurious ex posures. If the threshold limits referred to a maximum concentration existing at any time Office of T echnical Services, W ashington 25, U. (59 -2 U 7 5 )- . _ ., . 13. U .S .S .R . L itera tu re on A ir Pollution and R elated O ccupational Diseases. V oi. 1, Ja n . I960. P- Levine, U . S. D e tr im e n t of Comm erce. Technical Services. W ashington 25, D. U 14. U .S .S .R . L ite ra lu re on A ir Pollution and R elated Occupational Diseases. Vol. 2, M ar. ' 'c Levine, U - S. D e p a rtm e n t of 2^ ^ meg e - (6o.211S8)i T echnical Services, W ashington 25, D . U (t>U 110 0 ;. \y] [LIBRARY O f MEI F I J o A a v a s n ivi 1 IB R A R Y O F ME| , ; ?tr- i ; I i! . 3 1I jo l a v a a n ivi j l -S v i :; l. I j f p o Ao V.H 9 n * TV !i j " a. /?' I I8RARY O f ;! j | ' $ ' I* f * 9! (i` | jo Aavagn iv CP r A^vasn if 44 A ti January-February, 1S>$> ^ ! Two Ca. * Pharmacol. In Press. v aPr - Toxicol, and Applied L8. D onley D E - TV * i? t Solvents in Industrv . ep, 4 fiatllr a n d V olatile Toxicol. I.-571 (7936). P f a Case- / I n i. Hyg. 19. Parsons, C . E ,, a n d M E x r Phalopathy and " G r z n u l o ^ c ^ ^ J 0TM * '' - f&f?W3)lyCOt Ethera- J- M - ^ T 0J i M2 T U 2t y h^ ,S- r c h . G ' U,,. i S t : IUnpublilhed.and C` P' G'RPENTM<. Mellon > Occu*patio--n-a-l- -H-*-e*a*lt*h* TXrxaaiUnMinlgg will conduct a series1o f ^ u r 'related^o1*3 DlASi? 0qf Occupational Health Occupational Health Research ^ t ,ed,, cour.ses April 23-May 18, 1962, at the dustnal Hygiene Engineering] d es^ed 'fo T 'in d f'? 7 l C!nci.nnati> Ohio. /in the field of occupational health and 7 a S/ r-la7 bylenlsts and engineers cheni sts and chemical engineers if th if f ie ld ''- ^ H y e U tu C h < TM ^ y , for May 4. Trainees in both clim es m e e t t o S i r ^ ^ r ^ " 0^ ^ ^ APd l 23` m industrial hygiene and medicine toxicolow an^f ^ W6f k for lnstmctin evaluation of the environment M o o d 27, Pruicip]es pertaining to for the hygienists cover tem perature and hnm^d>ate 7 the second week> work noise measurement and control and indnst l ^ 7 m<rfsarementsf illumination, laboratory analyses for lead free silica Tnd S * yentl,af onl for the chemists, raphy, x-ray diffraction, electron ^mSosconv T d W o s c o p y , polarog-' time m both courses is spent in the laboratoV * * chromatgTMPhY- Much Its Control, May 7-11 0 ^ w d ^ tlS ! L S p ^ 3 ^ J J ldfengineer^ Heat StT6SS and of mdustnal exposure to extrema rah TM . ? s of measurement and control and humidity, with attention also U fed***** by temPerature time is divided about equally between leer personnel problems. Course A related course for the cLmisTs anJ eh 6- a?d laboratory zeroises. Techniques, May 7-18 (2 weeks) d chemical enp n eers is Solvent Analysis distilling column fractionation and - a f c h r o f T ? T ^ 7 exerdscs cover components in binary and complex Ivent 1C ,SeParation of the application of simple physical and ehem' l <- mixturs> In the principles and red " J Itravide. and infra separate components. n ldcatlon and determination of which is TrahllnZ Program Bulletin Applications or requests for information ^he^lr)6^ 10 S\nf e or related courses. Training Program, Robert A Taft SWt- h d be addressed to the Chief b" * " *"*>', 26. Ohio, o ^ H s T e g S S g f f ic t' ^ pB R lf A ano America dustrialj mendir This is| large m3 of ind there h i ciples tion, interpr<| Two? bearingl were bl The threshop ethylen| questior demons! industry certain] the T t and th (M A C| Equally! the m of for Fea iby the of the i include)* pliancel This Address: