Document k90G31py1YVwdvLN6wrnomN3b
UNITED STATESUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 1
NVIRONMAGEENBCYOS5 TPOOSNT, OFMFAIC E0 S2Q1U0AR9E-, 3S9U1IT2E
100
PROTECTION
Date:Dated as shown on electronic signature(s)
Subj:Inspection Report
Clean Water Act - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (" NPDES ")
Winterberry Circle
STEPHANIE
Digitally signed by
STEPHANIE TOUGAS
From:Stephanie Tougas, Inspector TOUGASDate: 2023.03-0.5'000 8'
12:37:17
Thru:Damian Bednarz, Inspector
To: File
I. Facility Information
A. Facility Name:Winterberry Circle
B. Facility Location:9 Gerrish Road
Salisbury, MA 01952
C. Facility Contacts: Jaclyn DeStefano
DeStefano Landscaping LLC
804 Haverhill Street
Rowley, MA 01969
978-833-7436
Tom Hughes, Consultant
Hughes Environmental Consulting
thughes@hughesenvr.com
D. NPDES ID No (s).: MAR10042P
II. Background Information
A. Date(s) of inspection: February 27, 2023
B. Weather Conditions: Sunny, 30 degrees, snow on ground
C. US EPA Representative(s):
Stephanie Tougas
Damian Bednarz
ED_019088A_00020777-00001
D. State / Local Representative(s):
None
E. Federally Enforceable Requirements Covered During the Inspection:
2022 Construction General Permit
F. Previous Enforcement Actions:
None known
III. Type and Purpose of Inspection
Evaluation. Inspection was result of citizen tip alleging discharge of stormwater tainted
with concrete.
IV. Facility Description
Winterberry Circle is a single - family residential development in Salisbury, MA. At the
time of the inspection, the road was paved and almost all the homes were complete, and
some were already owner - occupied. The development consists of nine homes. Wetland
and a tributary complex surround the property, mostly on the west side. These surface
water features appear to flow into Smallpox Brook.
V. Inspection
Inspector Bednarz and I (" we ") announced the inspection to the Facility the morning of
the inspection via a phone call.
We arrived at approximately 10:15 AM.
A. Opening Conference
We were met on site by Tom Hughes of Hughes Environmental Consulting. He said that
he is the stormwater inspector for the site and performs wetland monitoring. I presented
my credentials, provided a copy of the Small Business Resources Information Sheet, and
explained the purpose of the inspection.
Mr. Hughes said that the construction began in March 2022. He explained that because
each building is pre - fabricated, the critical activities on site are mainly excavation,
sediment and soil management.
We asked if any dewatering activities occur onsite, to which Mr. Hughes said that
everything is contained and infiltrated on site. I asked how often he conducts inspections
of the erosion controls, to which he responded weekly. He explained that when he has a
concern with an erosion control area, he contacts Jaclyn DeStefano (site operator) and
shows her the problem. Ms. DeStefano then relays this information to her crew at
DeStefano Landscaping and they address it.
2
ED_019088A_00020777-00002
I mentioned the tip we received from a concerned individual alleging the site was
discharging water contaminated with concrete. Mr. Hughes said he also received this
concern from an anonymous citizen and went out to the site the day after receiving the tip
to inspect. He says he found no evidence of the discharge having been contaminated with
concrete, such as staining of leaves and trees. Mr. Hughes showed us photos from that
inspection to support his conclusion.
B. Facility Tour
We began a site walk, walking north behind the house that the citizen tip alleged was the
source of the discharge of contaminated water. Due to the snow on the ground, we could
not observe any evidence of discharge. Mr. Hughes reiterated that the water going offsite
was not contaminated with concrete.
We continued our site walk, moving counterclockwise. We observed silt fences along
most of the perimeter, as well as silt socks. There were a few spots where part of the silt
fence had been compromised, but there was either a silt sock or wattle reinforcing the
fence. Mr. Hughes knew about these areas and had noted them in his most recent
inspection reports and said there were plans to address them.
We walked by a home that was already occupied by an owner. I asked what erosion
controls were in place for the slope of the lawn. Mr. Hughes said that they had some
seeding and erosion control matting down under the snow.
During our walk we observed two wetlands serving as stormwater controls. The
surrounding perimeter of the wetlands were vegetated and stabilized.
We observed a catch basin with inlet protection near the site entrance. As we came back
to the area where we started the site walk, we observed another catch basin. Mr. Hughes
said that both the catch basins drain to the stormwater wetlands. We asked Mr. Hughes if
there was a cover for a dumpster observed next to one of the houses. He said there is a
tarp to cover it. He also mentioned that there is a spill kit on site.
C. Closing Conference
At the end of our site walk, Ms. Jaclyn DeStefano arrived. I explained that we would
follow up with any questions / concerns we might have as we review our notes. I
mentioned that I did not observe a posting of NOI coverage or a posting indicating where
someone could obtain a copy of the SWPPP at the site entrance. Ms. DeStefano explained
that there used to be a temporary construction fence that had that information on it but
that it must have been moved with the fence and that they would replace the signs very
soon. I asked Mr. Hughes to send me a copy of the SWPPP and a few copies of his
inspection reports. I told him we would follow up with an inspection report within 60
days. We thanked them both for their time and departed at approximately 11:15 AM.
3
ED_019088A_00020777-00003
Unless otherwise noted, this report describes conditions at the facility / property as
observed by EPA inspector(s), and / or through records provided to and / or information
reported to EPA inspector(s) by facility representatives and as understood by the
inspector(s). This report may not capture all operations or activities ongoing at the time
of the inspection. This report does not make final determinations on potential areas of
concern. Nothing in this report affects EPA's authorities under federal statutes and
regulations to pursue further investigation or action.
Inspection Photos:
IMG_0914.JPG-looking north towards back of site, wetland area
IMG_0915.JPG-looking south at site
IMG 0916.JPG wattles under snow
IMG 0917.JPG - - stormwater wetland area
IMG_0918.JPG-silt fence needing maintenance, reinforced with silt sock underneath
snow
IMG 0919.JPG-mulch control with silt fence
IMG 0920.JPG-wetland basin outfall
IMG_0921.JPG-same outfall showing wetland basin behind it
IMG 0922.JPG-towards wetland area
IMG_0923.JPG-removed snow to show extra sediment control reinforcing silt fence
IMG_0924.JPG-stabilized stockpile
IMG 0925.JPG-wattle
IMG_0926.JPG-area where silt fence came down that just occurred
IMG_0927.JPG-sloped lawn by owner occupied house
IMG 0928.JPG-same house and lawn
IMG_0929.JPG - - perimeter of wetland stormwater control basin, stabilized sides
IMG 0930.JPG-outfall of wetland stormwater basin
IMG_0931.JPG-catch basin with inlet protection
IMG_0932.JPG-looking north towards site standing near entrance
IMG 0933.JPG-catch basin in back of site that leads to wetland stormwater basin
4
ED_019088A_00020777-00004