Document k64bxbmqX3pM4mogxnoaarvbb
Monsanto
mcM iml locaiioki
General Offices - St. Louis
d.'i January 24, 1969
auairti Niii.KiKct
Project Loss Prevention Report 69-7 CEA 2080
TO : Mr. R. S. Yates
R, E. Howard G. 0. Hunt P. K. Ward - Anniston S&PP Project File S&PP Location File
COPIES TO THOSE PRESENT
R. J. Green W. B. Howard R. M. Kountz W. E. Voss - Anniston R. S. Yates
DATE AND PLACE OF MEETING Mis s ouri .
January 23, 1969, Creve Coeur,
CEA 2080 Alabama.
Expand Solid Arochlors, Anniston Plant, Anniston,
This project is increasing the plant; capacity for manufacture of solid arochlors from 9.6 to 29.6M ppy. The project capital is approximately $1.03M. Completion target is December 15, 1969.
PERSONNEL
1. Chlorinated Biphenyl Content of Product
An overall
project objective is to minimize chlorinated biphenyl
content in the solid arochlor 5460. This is needed for
FDA approval of the material, since it is used in hot-
melt adhesives in food packaging. It is also used in
plasticizers.
2. Elevator
It is planned to install an elevator to
handle both freight and passengers. The elevator will
have the capacity for 5000 pounds and will likely be
hydraulically operated. It was agreed that the project
manager will review the elevator design and safety con
trols with Mr. George Gorbell.
.
3. Lime Addition
Lime is added to the still pot from
50 pound bags. This size bag is considered safe for
personnel handling.
r/i-/
u/
0612377
TOWOLDMONOQ48679
R, S. Yates
2 January 24, 1969
MECHANICAL
An external gas-fired heater is used for the
still pot. Combustion safeguards are planned by the project; these will include a Honeywell protecto-glow unit. There will also be a pilot interlock. . The combustion safeguards should '
be reviewed with Mr. George Ostroot when the heater design is
further along.
In addition, some process safety provisions will be incorporated in the heater. A high temperature sensing unit on the process material coming out of the furnace will shut down the burner on high temperature. If the circulation through the heater stops, an alarm will sound. Standard instrumentation will be employed for these functions.
PROCESS
1. Alarms and Interlocks
The operation of the chlorinators
will be sequence controlled. Chlorination starts at a
temperature of about 150C. As the batch progresses the
sequence controller steps, the temperature upward so that,
at the conclusion of chlorination of a batch, the tempera
ture is in the range of 250-255C. The temperature will
_
be recorded in the chlorinator; an alarm will be actuated
at high temperature. It was agreed that the project will
consider use of a differential temperature alarm, based
on the desired temperature at any stage of the batch, rather
than a high temperature alarm which must function at a
temperature higher than the maximum batch temperature. It
was believed that this type of alarming would be a better
investment of money than the addition of a second high
temperature alarm on the reactor, and located in the vapor
discharge from the reactor.
There will also be temperature detection in the arochlor
circulating line on the chlorinator. A high temperature
in this line will give an alarm and will also close the
chlorine supply valve. The complete closure of the
chlorine supply valve will not be possible because chlorine
will come from tank cars rather than from the chlorine
unit.
.
If flow should cease in the arochlor circulating line there will be an alarm and the chlorine valve will be closed.
There will also be an alarm if the therminol circulation should stop.
-/yi>/y
>1
<T
0612378
TOWOLDMONOQ48680
R. S. Yates
3 January 24, 1969
Other alarms include the following: a scale alarm to prevent overcharge of the weigh tank; a low temperature alarm on the chlorinator at 120C; water coolant to the
therminol cooler to prevent too low a water temperature: ' a signal when the batch is 80% chlorinated in order to signal the time to initiate sampling; high (80C) and low (60C) temperature on the circulating therminol. The project is also considering installation of a nuclear instrument on the process circulating line at the chlorinator to determine density; it is hoped that this density figure can bo correlated with softening point. If the correlation works out on a present plant test, the equipment will be installed.
2 Operating Time
The operating time of the present unit
is only about 74%. Downtime on a chlorine plant has been
a part of the problem; the new purchased chlorine arrange
ment should help this. Another part of the problem has
been maintenance. It is also hoped that this can be im
proved in order to improve the on-stream factor.
3. HCl Scrubber
In order to minimize the HCl venting to
the atmosphere the project will add equipment for improved
HCl absorption and scrubbing.
4. Gas Fired I-Icater Operation
The firing rate on the heater
is manually indexed on a flow controller on the gas to the
burner. This type of control has proved adequate with the
present plant installation and is believed to be adequate
for the new heater. The project will also try to design
the heater coils in such a manner as to simplify coil re
moval for the furnace. The furnace coils can be expected
to burn out approximately annually. This is considered a
normal maintenance item and presents no major problems.
5- Residue Removal
If the residue is removed from the
system in the manner used at present, the fume hood venting
provisions will be improved over those at present. The
project also plans to try to develop a system for flaking
the residue.
BUILDING AND FIRE PROTECTION
An 18' x 901 x 2 level bay
will be erected adjacent to the north wall of Building No. 27.
The construction will be open steel frame with reinforced fiber
glass polyester wind-breaks, concrete slab roof and steel grate
flooring at the first level above ground level.
Hydrant #13 with hose house and hydrant #19 with attached monitor nozzle are adequate fire protection. No sprinklers or fire proofing are needed.
0612379
TOWOLDMONOQ48681
R. S. Yates
4 January 24, 1969
A 20' x 30' extension to the existing control room will be
erected at the 16 ft. level. The construction will be con
crete block walls and non-combustible roof. No fire protection
i's needed.
'
LOSS EXPOSURE
The maximum probable loss was considered to
come from loss of the heater for the still pot as a result of
explosion in the fire box. It was considered that approximately
six days will be required to re-brick and repair the heater. A
spare coil will be kept in stock.
It was estimated that the repairs would cost about $10M. Six days were estimated to be sufficient for the repairs. The business interruption loss during this period of time would be approximately $45M.
LOSS PREVENTION REVIEW CHECK LIST
Attached to R. S. Yates'
copy of this report is a copy of Form G-1425, Loss Prevention
Review Check List, which can be used as a safety check list
for this project.
LOSS PREVENTION REVIEW BY PLANT
The S&PP Branch of CED can
not review design prints and construction steps in detail as
this project progresses. S&PP requests plant personnel, in
cluding plant safety personnel, to hold additional safety
reviews at the plant, to follow the development of design
prints, and to check the progress of construction in order to
make maximum contributions from their experience with these
operations to the C.ED personnel involved in execution of this
project.
SAFETY MANAGER
G. 0. Hunt will be Safety Manager for this
project. Please contact him for additional safety reviews
needed during design.
R. J. Green
^
bjr Attachment
0612380
TOWOLDMONOQ48682