Document k41z5d8QzMx8Qnyebb3LQZQb

U T ^7- f ieCEIVED^^ ^ jL JUN 2 7 "891UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ALICE L. WARREN v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL ) ) ) ) ) S.RB.^ CIVIL ACTION ifO 89--30201--F 'further order tT' June 26, 1991 PONSOR, U.S.M.J. Counsel for all parties appeared before th LS court on June 25, 1991 for a settlement conference. At that tim Lt emerged that productive discussions must await further clarif cation of the status of the parties. With this in mind, the dburt orders as follows: 1. On or before July 12, 1991 the plaintiff w .11 report to this court, in writing, regarding the status of current defendants Conoco and Union Carbide. 2. Also by that date, the plaintiff will cdi ey to the defendants, in writing, her counter-dem<.] This communication should contain a specificat in of the plaintiff's calculation of special damages including lost wages (past and future), medical experj s and the like. If plaintiff is relying on more thar ne theory of recovery, it would be helpful if the dqi nd letter allocated portions of the total demand ng these various theories. In any event, the demand Id factor in some percentage to recognize the possiJp: ity of a defendants' verdict in this case. 3. Counsel will appear again before this rt for a further settlement conference on September 1991 at 2:00 p.m. The court is not ordering, but plaintiff * s counsel may wish to consider the approprtiallteness of having plaintiff herself present for this conference, Because of the delay in scheduling the confe elnce due to various vacations, the court will extend the eriod for completion of discovery appropriately, if necfssary. It is So Ordered. / MICHAEL A. PONSOR U. S. Magistrate Ji^dfce UCC 077371 AAOO 456 ((RReevv.. 5/85) NNoottiiccee ' Sz y , -* *# Z^/ 'f t-Jys y f } ^ J)$tak& m*TM' i strict ( JUN : c 1991 DISTRICT OF MASSACHUS] b _________ alice l. Warren, Plaintiff v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et. al., Defendants S.KB.y CASE NUMBER: N 89- ICE 201-F : ' V' S - 2 ________ TTPEOfCASE: UNCIVIL CRIMINAL 1 TAKE NOTICE That a proceeding in this case has been set for the place date, and tlm 9 S t forth below: place ROOM NO. DATE ANO TIME TYPE OP PROCEEDING FURTHER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE r.(xj TAKE NOTICE that the proceeding In this case has been continued as indicated belov PLACE U.S. District Court, Magistrate Courtroom DATE ANO TIME PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED s 6/14/91, 11:00 CONTINUED TO, OATE AND TIME July 31, 1' >9 ., 2:00 p.m. June 7, 1991 DATE To: Mark S. Granger Keith A. Minoff--- Sharon R. Burger htRobert J. Smit Jr. 7otclerk op (ircuj^c*. (BY) OEPLfTY CLERK C/ Claudia J. Ree a 785-0240 1 UCC 077372 j