Document jyo9oMqjgdabwz02rY11Ra142
CTL032753
June, 1992
VINYL CHLORIDE MONOMER
an Executive Review for VI/Uni-Bell
by Dave Eckstein, Project Lead
Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) detects VCM in water in Doniphan Rural Water District #5 (D#5), up to 8 ppb.
July, 1992
KDHE issues a public notice of VCM contamination to D#5 users advising alternate drinking water source.
March 1993
EPA notifies Uni-Bell of extraordinary levels of RVCM in 23 year old PVC pipe from D#5 (+300 ppm). EPA requests Industry's assistance in remediation technology.
/
C TLO 3 2*7 54
May, 1993
VI/Uni-Bell agree to co-fund not-to-exceed $25k project to source the VCM.
July, 1993
NSF presents data summary confirming: - 23 year old PVC pipe as the VCM source - No other source of VCM - Post VCM certified pipes are not contributing VCM
July, 1993 PW Pipe files TOSCA 8(e)
/
CTL032755
August, 1993 Industry team meets With EPA and agrees to
- Remediation Alternatives report
- Predictive computer model (Berens)
- Develop a protocol for statistically correct sampling program to scope the incidence in rural water systems.
4
Sept., 1993
Project Lead requests joint VI/Uni-Bell B of D level meeting.
Sept., 1993
Uni-Bell Board Sub-Committee of potable water pipe producers meets to develop concensus position.
/
GSitrro ff\ <v\ -
SAMPLING
/SH anSd po-^ .fi\ - --GLv <r<A
0jp/ a rn-A G*tj\ >j-* ' < 0A
Co
p0T
KT- pSpG
PROJECT LEAD - G,y'GA Crf plyn'-JO-i' UtUA t
( EGa-
C^n^J^o3X (Qs>J-)
'Ab G/Ja vvXk
RESPONSE PREPAREDNESS -UakPGG /AAAAVc
V
^ UT ^!o pj poG /^s5S^t*aA.
NON-MEMBER READ-IN
CTL032757
SAMPLING
* Statistically correct sampling program to scope the incidence.
* Should VI elect to proceed on this item, Uni-Bell will contribute* staff to coordinate the sample collection and oversee project.
* Sampling protocol should finalize and proceed to EPA for agency sign-off.
* If sampling results are negligible, Industry's involvement ends. If not, re-evaluation will be required at that time.
/
CTL032758
PROJECT LEAD
* This item must be of the highest priority for VI, Uni-Bell and NSF.
* This is an issue concerning VCM, therefore, VI should review their desire to accept project lead.
* Because of the priority for Uni-Bell, we would retain the lead if VI desires.
CTL032759
RESPONSE PREPAREDNESS
* It is time to assume that word is out.
4
* Prepare a summary of work to date.
* Prepare information on our current product.
m/
C T L 0 3 2 '7
NON-MEMBER READ-IN
o vD
* Eventually need& to occur. Both for grass roots PR support and broader based financial support in future funding needs.
* Read-in at October PPFA meeting is a VI decision. Please advise Uni-Bell.
I
/
(