Document jyNER9E7Lwez2yb6wO6e3wB7N
Te
re
IN C .
o
o
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
EMPLOYE & PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT H E ALT H DIVISION
C. H. B A Y L O R , M. D., m e d i c a l d ir e c t o r E U G E N E R. STANTON, M. D., ASSIST AN T M ED ICAL DIRECT OR ALLAN E. DOOLEY, in d u s t r ia l h y g ie n is t
*
Dr. R. A. Kehoe Kettering Laboratory Eden & Bethesda Avenues Cincinnati, Ohio
135 E A S T 42n d S T R E E T N E W Y O R K 17, N. Y.
January 2, 1963
North Charleston, S. C. Lead Investigation
Dear Dr. Kehoe:
We have received data on one of our employes who works in the laboratory of our Charleston, S. C. terminal.
Mr. A. E. Dooley and I are at a loss to explain these findings of lead in the urine. This terminal is a small opera tion and follows the same routine testing procedures as those in many other operations which are carefully outlined and pre scribed by our Research and Technical Department. We know of no other case of alleged lead intoxication from any other such worker throughout the Company.
I am enclosing for your study the data submitted to us. We felt the first step would be to have careful checks run on the urine and blood to be sure there are abnormal amounts of the metal in the urine and blood.
If you concur in this proposal, please forward to Mr. Paul Hartzel (Texaco Inc. - Virginia Avenue, No. Charleston, S. C.) instructions and proper containers for the specimens. You may wish urine samples for several days, but we request that you handle the details as you see fit. Mr. Hartzel, our superintendant at Cha r l e s t o n will arrange to have the specimens collected according to your instructions.
Of course, the chelating agent by this time may have helped eliminate part of the lead, if it was present originally in pathological quantities. On the other hand, if the values you find are normal, either they were not abnormal to begin with or else they have been reduced to normal.
If you find or think that the possibility of lead in toxication is likely, we shall have to investigate more thoroughly for a possible source of the lead absorption.
N13177
K & 001
Dr. R. A. Kehoe
-2-
1/2/62
Mr. *is 48 years old and has worked for Texaco since 1939 but I do not know the exact time he has spent on this particular job.
For any expenses associated with this investigation, please send the bill to me.
Yours very truly,
chb:ag Enc.
C. H. Baylor, M. D
cc: Messrs. Hartzel & Mosher
Atlanta, Georgia, December 28, 1962
NORTH CHARLESTON, S. C. SALES TERM. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
3.75
1.75
7/
Dr. C. H. Baylor, New York, N. Y.
Dear Sir:
Supt. Paul Hartzel of our North Charleston, S. C. Sales
Terminal on December 15th addressed the attached memorandum letter
to the writer w ith regard to the absence from work of employee
carried on our payroll as a Tester.
.
Mr. as Tester works in the laboratory main
tained at our Charleston terminal performing the various tests on
petroleum products received from our Port Arthur terminal by tanker
as well as occasional shipments in tankcars, prepares compounds and
blends of lubricating products for guidance of our terminal people
in the manufacture of Texaco products and performs certain routine
tests on additives purchased for use by this terminal.. Mr.
has worked in the laboratory at our Charleston terminal for i=^numbeiT?
of years.
'
As Mr. Hartzel points out in his memorandum letter, there
is some question as to the lead iq the system of M r 1
discussed this matter with Mr. J. F. Collins, Jr. of our Research &
Technical Division who headquarters here in Atlanta and he also
feels there is some question as to whether Mr.
has lead in
his system.
..
In the meantime I received from Mr. Hartzel our Form G-267 that is being processed with our Comptroller's Department in order that the employee's personnel folder will be correct covering his absence from work. It contains a medical certificate signed by Dr. Wilson of Charleston, S. C. confirming the presence of lead in specimens of urine examined by him. Mr. Collins agrees that if this employee did have a type of lead poisoning that a few days rest in the hospital would not dissipate the lead.
We would like to request your advice as to whether or not this employee should be examined by some other physician who might be better qualified to determine if there was lead in the system
Although I might call on some of our lead suppliers for this information, I felt it best to write your office first and seek your advice and counsel before calling any outsiders in on this
problem.
Dr. C. H. Bailey
2-
Becember 28, 1962
If you think it advisable, I would appreciate your advice as to what doctor or laboratory should be selected in or near Charleston that this employe could go to for any additional tests you might feel are called for under the circumstances.
Your advice will be deeply appreciated.
Yors very
WEM: jw Dr. CSG JEF PH CTF
. E.1 MOSHER
00)25
F^/ra G-267 (;i*59) *5M
e
No. Charleston, S. C., Dec. 14* 1962
Dr. Robert Wilson, Jr 15 Rutledge Ave. Charleston, S. C,
Dear Doctor:
In order to facilitate the administration o f our employe be ne fit plans, will you kindly fill out the medical
ce rtificate concerning the employe named below and return it to me.
_`
t
Very truly yours,
Nam e o f employe
5O7 Draper St.,
Addre ss No. Charleston, S,, C.
Occu p atio n T p .q t .p r
' Day X ____Sh ift_____________ Date employed
First day o f abse nce for this illness or injury 1 2 / 6 / 6 2
M ED ICA L CER T IFICAT E
( T o b o fille d in by Ho o d in g p h y*ici*n )
Brief history, including date cf onset of illness or injury: F i r s t examined November 23, 1962 and found t o,,,
ave weakness o f t he r ig h t hand which was t hought t o be due t o a p e r ip h e r a l n e u r i t i s . Th r e e ' !
pecimens o f u r in e wer e examined fo r le a d , 2k hour s a mp le s , t h e f i r s t showing 3 .5 m g., t h e !
econd n e ga t iv e , and t he t h ir d 1.6 mg. Admit t ed t o h o s p it a l fo r Ve r s a n a t e t h e r a p y.
>
Diagnosis: Pe r ip h e r a l n e u r i t i s p r ob a b ly due t o lead i n t o x i c a t i o n . Present condition and prognosis: Ir npr eved, Pr o gn o s is good .
Ib-
33 . . 1,
i1
Date first seen No v. ?3 , 1Q6?____________________________Date last seen . De c , 13 , lf)6 ?
Employe can resume work on or abo ut__ De c. 26. 1962___________________________________ _____
Signe d_______
f g-j______________________________ , AL D.
Addre ss________________ 165 Ru tle d g e Av e . Ch a r e s t o n . S . C.
Date _. 1 2 -1 8 -6 2
RAND OM LET T ER
INSTRUCTIONS--CANCELS LETTEtU'S) OP
PERMANENT
ROUTINE
1/ .
ONED 3T_ TEMPORARY
FORMMl
Ctt&Pz,
i___
'_^J=vP -j
'
(Location)
(Date)
V ~ " U) ,$v
(Subject)
/ jy
PAOS
r'v-'
J^r~ A Jr ^ > ~ ^ s J^ \ y iU~t^P*= f p
J2-^*4L*rY~4Z22^: '/'><ZP,^Lr^L^.--,
y-<-^--
Mu-4^
If letter requires r ep ly prepare In tr ip licate,-for w arding original an d duplicate, an d retain cop y.
By-
Make explanation helqw ,,Return or igin al. RetajilMup licate.
v
- ^ r r y y x Ket0^r^
--v ^ ?V ^y1
JUuP^>-