Document jyMM38rqmqJXVmLyYD9eDrjgp
QEHR - 0400. 373 (0008117828)
7 5.
AR 226-0 IF
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT
one
Determination of the Presence and Concentration of Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)
(CAS Number: 2759-393)
in the Serum of Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed to Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate via Gavage
Laboratory Report No. U2779
Requester Project No. 3M Tox 6295.13
ee--------ee-- r ee--e ----ee esete erer met
Study Dates
Study Initiation: 10 June 1999
Sample Analysis Initiation: 22 June 1999
Sample Analysis Completion: 28 June 1998 `Study Completion: At signing
001172
PCeAruScNruomobcearn2e7n5s6o3r5s3i
La ReSaMvREeeb nspvoiuomoNbmoo ee.nrFt(AaRGLaNTbYr oTUro2actT1oT0rSy8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
StuyPerso 2dCOMDUDS rr
nerd
SIOFR COMPE EANGN . rn2
(GLPSHY:d
Quality ASSUTNCE SHAEMeNt........
smam------------------3
SATE RECEIR
smm------
POCO DOVRIONS...rrrs
Data Summary, ATalSes, and RESUS...
SUMMBLYOfQUallyCON!ADGYSSSROSES...
.
RE
SEOM fCONE GSION N 1... REMBMECES. rr
mm m------
8 ----
| 9 nmsmm--
001173
Pagel
CPHetSrNsaomcaeo2s7s5t5o3n8s3s
`STUDY PERSONNEL AND CONTRIBUTORS
Analytical Chemistry Laboratories: `SAedrvuamncAendalBlyosAensalytical Services, Inc. 1It5haCcaat,hNeYrw1o4o8d5R0oad KrJioshtnenR_J.PeHrakninsse,n,PhP.hD.,D,,AsSstiustdaynDtiSrceicetnotrifcDirector
AIrngiufseReTseesatricnhgLaLbaorbaotorrayt, oInrcy. 5H0o5rsShhaeme,hPyA.Dri1v9e0,4B4ulding A RaymGo.Ynordk, Ph.D. DABT,StudyDirector
S3MpoTannsdcoorlogy Serv-iMecdiecasl Deparment S3tM PCaeunlt,erM,NBu5l5k1i4n4g-212000.02E.02 Marvin T. Case, DM, Ph, SponsorRepresentative
MERongevr.eFrACLTaTboorxs1t0r8y LaboratoryRequestNm (RNHIZTTS
001174
Page tt10
CPAeSrtNoarmsoccearn2es7u5t5o3r9a3ts
LaboratoryReMqFuaEengsitormrrNmeaon.raFl(LLaANboWTrICosZctT1oTT0rSy8
`STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
SudyTe: APnayetcarlLafborautoroy Rerp(oPrctFoOnSot)hiencDheteetSrmeiranuamtinoonfoSerfathgsuPeru-eDsaefwnecyeo"anRadntCsonEacxepnoitsreadteitoonof PotassiumPeruorcocanesuvfiaoGnaavalgee
Study denticatonNumber: FACTTox-108
R"eTgiuslsattiuodnyswafoscNoonndcuicritcead iLnacobmrpaltiraynSceuwietsh [FDoaodtaanRedqDuriruegmAedrmdin(i)s:tr2a1tiConFGR o(oPdarLta5b8o)r,atwoirytPhaeceixcsa(pGtLiPo)nisn ahsesbuurlalnecteeudinsit.Abeulodw.prIonaceddduorens,anthdepfriensdienngtssourcuhtaspbeerefnoramuedditaetdehoesSpMeEcnviivreoynbmeynatnaliLnadbeopreantdoernyatnudsaktty Tpaabrotriactiopratyiangncdonwtilacbet lraebtoarianteordifeosr aarpeehrousneodtwi0tehxdcoceuemdenfetatyieoanrsp,Terhneeannatly0ttihciaslsptorutdiyoinncaorcmivpesalatettthteee3MIdM ESntvainrdoanrmdeOnptearlaLtaibngwParsocpeedrufroems.edinaccordancewih3MEnvionmentlTechnologyandSafety Services
Excato GpLPtcomiplioancne: + Tuoseparatestudydirectorswereassigned oth ne phaseandthe anaytalphase of isstucy + TheABS finalreportdoesnothaveaStatementofComplance. + T2h1oCFQRAUPasrtatt5e8mentintheABS inalreportindicates compiancewihEPA40 CFRPat732 ratherthan FOA + DuolsyveacloindfaitremdationanalyseswerenotconductedaccordingtotheGLregulations;analyticalmethodwasnot + Notallrawdatawereverfedbythegroupleader designee
4 Ze fb
StuyDirector
I= Feb -00
Cate
Sponsor Representative
Go
001175
Pase2e1t0
PaCtAuSoNruomocbaenre2s7u5t9o3n9s3ts
asoratory ReIqMuEeRmesptiooNrtnummNboe.enrFt(AaRCLNTaMbTUoorZxaT-t1To0rS8y
GLP Stupy
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT
SudyTile:
APnearlfyutiocraoloLcatbaonreastourfyonRaetpeo(rPtoFOnSt)hein DtheetSeerumionfaotSfpitrohaenguPe-OarwieeyansRdalCesonEcnxepntorcsaetdieotno of Potassium Perfucroocianesufonate via Gavage
`Study Identification Number: FACT Tox108 "tThheifsosltluodwyihngatsabbleee.Tnihnesfpiendcitnegdsbwyertheer3epMoErntveidrtontmhensttauldLyadbiorreacttoorraynQduamiatnyaAgsesmuernatn.caUnit (QA)as indicated in
INSPECTION DATES
Ee
EET
From 1230-99
To | 010600 Draft Final Report
I
01-11-00
0107-00
|
J QAU|Representative:
2-11-00 Date
001176 Page3otio
rpeerpseermpns
1 Y nR a
INTRODUCTION
Oo
CsFar isntSD semen CF
Oo
pos Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)
Car emisors
orneg
F S m Purpose. r t my n ein ge sO deme0Sra -- HS ea s ag SHRNEHA ASS S TET f erstT Syse tem r sarE E nT yTe Sy ),E SA e pupT0%T Tra etreT S inTT sA r L S Shir e n Rsem dEeE0r2naes,arIeresheye t bye geenbneertmirmdSrhr), A gn setgeeraesrirtarennfsf0),hecutrdsee rgeswcessryt iie eGrpg oonee
Table 1. FO Generation Rat Population Demographicsfor Study T-6295.13
E [oor raonr |arm |rT arer r |-- Gramma | [EoE nSEro|t weroa o| sm oa maaim ro arsss |zsro asnsg nrs|
--
001177
PCeAtSoNrusmobcearn2e7s5u9n3s9t3n
MReEpnovritooNmoe.nFtALCaTboTaoixc1r0ay LaboracryRecues Nor(RNFUZTTS
T`heCtesht sRiyavsetreLrmabsoipreactieoersiseasndnsctr.aipnesremlaencetnetdlwydaesntiheeCdHuLsCiOn'gEaRMoVnAeFlP"lsueslfiSeprracgnuee-aOratwaige.yF)Oragterneecreatiivoendfraotms wienrdoiicda etanggweitdt,eaiandftaafgesp.adr1agmeenteerrsatwironeaeivsawleuraetedeinteemdsoasfphaertoefrei(thdearmGraonudpi|oerrumbeersr,sbaurtawienrenot wthaecnrhemceenitv,edT(aWbeliegh4)t. dFaOavaigeinfnecmuadledratsAwrgeurseaRetseeaasrtc6h0Ladbaoyrsaotofraigese,aInncd,weinaglhreedpaoprptrfoorxsitmuadtyelTy-26002-6262.51o3n f`aldmaitnitshtee3rMeadrchheitveess).rMiacleeroatcosnosfitdehresedapmaerstoofutrchefaenstdssyisatenwm.ereusedoy sbreedersandwerenot
`SampleColleacndtAnialoysins wFeOraencdol1leacnteidmarlosmastsheiFgnOemdatttehdefcemoanlrlapsooanwderFe1cpuullpesdoasnsdiagnyed1 ipotheophsaOtmndaapyc1oa4pksoursibtgpnratoruetpu.umO,snamcmapyl.2e2s poismtmpeairtteulmy,sfraomzpelneosnwderryeccoelalnecdtmeadirnotmaitnhedfreomzaeinnin(g70arCraorlbselnotwh)utnesttsshyisptepme.d tAotcheol3ecMiEendvsiaomnpmleenswtearie Laboratories. FIOn)thaenadntahteyicoaflissprtinygr(egepnoerrtaetdihoenrs,1s)ewrearseaamnpalleyszceodlfloercttheedpfrroemsehnecepoofpulPaFtOiSo.nof exposed amas(generation `TSheereaxstarmapcltsewsewerroeqeuxatnriaicatteedblyyanaialiyzdedquusiidnegxttruarcbtoiioonnpsrporcaeyduur duscihnrgoamnatoongraaiprhiynigmaagsesnstpaencdiertohmyeltayctate A(nLalMytSic)ailnsdeelteactaerd ionncmuondiecdrninigs(SrMep)omrtde,thaenrddetPaFOSaloevaevlaswlearieeevtalhuastteuddyagbaiinndsetremxatirnatcaiiendsetdabnydatrhdes.IM FisorneAnalytical Chemisty Team(FACT),hebinderislocated nthe 3Marchives. AinnacloymspetsaanscseewssiihngGtohoedpLraebosreantcoeraynPdracocnicceenRtergautliaontoifonPs(F2O1S iCnFtRh 56s)eaVaoifdSaptreagdumeetDhaovdseaynadtsstwaendraercdoonpdeurcattiendg procedureswee aloweddungthepreparaton andanalysisofthsamplesassociatedwihthissuc.
SAMPLE RECEIPT
o`fSasmplet sfwoermeu Nroevcee, imvbeedfro1m96A8r,ghuosuRegsheFeabrrcuhaLrayb,or1a9t6o9r,ieSsamspploersadrieccaayv,eddwuenrgaapnadcaktatgheeedninddoyftichee.iSnp-ecpihmaesnes wereregisteredwithhe 3M EnvormentalLaboratoryandtansieredtoa freezerfor storage. `LSaabmopralteosroifesb(Pordoytoicsoslue4s1a8n-0d14f,SdtoutyheTr6t2h9a5n,r1a3t)s,ebruutmwwereerneocotlplaerctoefdahnedsrceocpeievoefdfanoalmyAsrsguinshReepsroetaorccohl detebyrthmestiudyndireectdor. `StpheceimSeanmsplseeTntrtaockAidnvgaSnycsetdeBmioSatnaanldyatridcOalpeSreavtiicensg,Prnocc.ed(uArBeS)SpoercainmaleynssissweenrtetroeAcBeSivweidlabnedrreatcukmeeddactocohrediMng Eriednpevonrittir.foiSncpamteeincotni,amslteLonarsbawogirea,ltaobnerdymcUahpiaoninancioonfmepdcluesntttioohdneyopMfraonEoanclvoylissriosananmndeddnasttuaablmaLairbseosriaoctnaotorefytdshpeetchsiumbsectnoundarryacbchitinvadebesor.raSotraomnpiyls(esr)reepfcoearitlpt(,FACT Tax-108);thebinderi located the SM archives
Page1s0
001178
m terTme
woI enrmnmnEeSy
ct MoATmEmRiItAm CLrSarAaNcDaiMaaEtTiioHnOnDSus rre heenshar r is ate.Cramton TarTetut ne Cor nd Ref
CTomo e vommoenas|
ten ECo oTorosermmmo|
: re
001179
foOR
remrce r
bl. Cchacaonnsr ddTTasmie eern rTTeottunc Cotr nd tc
TT pr------
ComeTousomat conse
Te
E hostel prpon ceadurr e in n ABa sSnfdrwa)rLanet podoa sret (Aate scehmesnt7)
Cramer
Physical Description and Light-colored powder
T om ow] IdentityAnalyses
SS oman tered serer sots a-- spen ec A eeCty e tte Se WaE nepFo n EbYeSeEeSarfaoenee, T t ethosse ummarien s t T, Trenrw eseay sn Ct 5eterr rirs
E sApt IegTtht sc r oonglLeHsTSTg TS) r ten d SASae t oaet e S B a e en ed ee riS e e PaarSsTeeiseoTtnwrioy Es
ran
001180
PCoArStNuaromsoca2n7s5o6r.3s8i3s
SMREmieomepnFtArlCLTTaoobxo,10s8y LaborRecutMme LANHUTTD
`EquiupsemdaetAnBSt: Lamssystem: MaAustsossapmecptlreormWeatetre:rPsE71S7CpIlEusXAPI 365withTubolonSprayTM intaface MoAbilnephaacsoellucmonmy:pKoenyisetnotcn:eBeatasliTM Ci, 2.1mxm(5Sy0m)
``CCoommppoonneenntt8A6--01-01900mmeetthhaanncoil22mmMMaammmmoonniiuummaaccestaattee ICnojelcutminontveomlpuemrea:tu3re5:4Ambient NeCburuaziangrags:asU:HUPHnPinroigreongen Cleocnsusptaayivnogtpoatgeen:ti-al3:00305V1 Nze=gioa4nsmfto9onrivPt8oFrOeeSd.: MH0 Tota/lruznti=me:f4o8r.02tmeirna7uHt.PesF0OS MH
ProtocolDeviations "Therewerenodeviationsfom theorginalprotocal.
DATA SUMMARY, ANALYSES, AND RESULTS
`SummaryofQualityControlAnalyses Resuits(ABS) + Trhaenginetdefro-mass1a.yp5r7e4ci0s1io%n (oerlaFiOveSs,taannddathred dienvlira-tisosna-yRaScDc)udraatcayfr(oelmadivaeeyoqru--ayEc)orianlgesdafmoplmes 7.32-10.1%. Both areacceptable ranges. + aTchceuirnatceya(sRsEa)yfpormecsitsiaonnda(rRcSsDr)anofgesdtfarndoamr-ds5a8n6-g1e1d.f0o%.mAl1.a1r1e-a5c.c8e3p%tabolreFrOaSng.eTsheitr-sssay + Coefoffdetiermicnatiionweerne20t.99s54. + RueafletrytcootnhterAolBpSafrinaalvorelpuomret ((Aotnae-c0h-m4eennt .t,Toanbsl)e.2) orprecisionand accuracydataontheanalysesof
FoS llowinu g iionm ffoSrmaatmm iponlreega aRredsinugr lstasm(ply AeBaSn)aysesinhepresentsi: The eSxmcaoslealdmepvdlotelhsuiemnceassiwnbaerlrayettocenaxltuarnnagcuetmaebndedfrouspmpt1eharenisdai3mpwolfeeqrsueaarnenatdsarsteaaoynnea(lbUyeLzCce)ad(u.fRseeearthstesoaTmayebealdsesias8meipndlacetostnrcaeacsnhitmreeadnitoi)nns maetaisauchrmeednctP)o. ncewnithtinrtheacattriatoonrnangse,and hedatavere reported(vert Table6in
Originaldataorcopiesthere areavelabioatthe 3M EnvironmentalLaboratory.
Paesc1t0
001181
CPAetSoNrmocbaenre2s7u5t5n3s9t3s
MERveepoorntmeFrtaAl LaCTboorxaTt1o0r8y LaboratoryRecues Numer(LANHIZTTS
STATISTICAL METHODS
MaALcAiBnSt,odsahtcaomfrpoumtpee.aFkoalroewianswgepreeakianrteegariantteedgbrayttihoenP,EMaScCCIuEaXnprreosgurasmcaMtaacwQeuraecnoTMn,veverrtseidon1 t1.e4x,tolnesa,movedfo pePnrAo)f.AoBTnShmoeWdfloaetsnesUvonenfrao,nuaannyddseiadsnnaauplmpylbzieeerddsw:iahtwohewtiehvgeeiWrea,dtss(toa1nn)dTMaqsruodafdatrnwadatriqucarpieatgcyrkecsaosgnietorn(ovtldoetasthcandweare,raon5u.31.dn01fdcoeadmlPc0SattSeo,nesnwsce.inWriaefycannet, gurespriorto reporttheidanag.
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND DATA INTEGRITY
Nfoolorwuinmgsdtaatnacqeusaeitxyiosbtjeedcdtiuvensg(DhQeGpsre)sweenrtestouldoywtehadtdwuoriungthhaevsetaufdfye:ctedthequality oneg ofthedata.The
+ Linearity--The coefficientof determination (7) ofthe standardcurve wasequal oor greaterthan 0.98
+ LisofQuaitation(LOQ)--Ecualto the owestacceptablestandardnth cabatoncurve Duplicateaccaptaieprecision-- <30% Spike acceptablerecoveies--70% 0 130% Uso ofconfimatorymethods--noconfimatorymethodswereused + Demonstrtonofspeccwaisdeymons--tratsedbypchroematocgrapihiciretenctionyme,massspectal
{MK]proon dcharuacecrzattion AQasnsuaulmaysinensgt,ttthhetaaiotms+t3piv0ok%efe.dreTetcehocvteivroaynlt(LeOoDsf)tfifosorPmasFsaOusSmupltsaiabopinpehrioansdsiicnmaoattitoebnleoyef1n.ev7ne5dnrogtg/eenndLob.auysncdathnehreaterlcihtrneoicqfouuveaesnr.ytI,iGasatteiaronuamr(eLOC) 5 005pgimi. PEGS.
STATEMENT OF CONCLUSION StatoefCmoncelunsiotn: Uinndfeorpthhaesceonodfitthoenssuocfyt.hAedpdrietsieonntalt,uPdeFsO,SPwFaOsoSbwsaesrovbesdeirnvseerdainStshseuseesrataokfeFnOffoemmaFl1e gratesenxeporspeaudptsdiufroinmgnthe fbaumtanoterxatpsoesxepdosnedu1r0.heestsubstance,andin 1 generation ppsexposed th lstsubstancevia aciaton,
Pagesatio
001182
CPAeoSrNsoomcbaenrs2s7s6t9o3n5s3e
Lasers WMquEResmtvcemremraFgnA(ClLLTNoaHTboUorZax.Tt1oT0rSy8
REFERENCES
Nore.
ATTACHMENTS
+ AtachmentA:SampleReceiptandChainofCustodyDocumentation + Atach8:mPeronlotcs AttachmenCt: ExtarndaAnaclytticailMetohonds + AtachmenDt: Dose ConfimatonAnayses + AtiEa:DactaShummmaryeandnTabtles AttachmenFt:AnalyticalReports fromContiouingLaboratories + AtachRepmoretSingnatturGePa:ge
Page 1010
001183
PCoHrStuNormobcenra2s7u5t5o3n5s3s
[A`-- RepFAaCTtTooxi.0h Laboratory RequestNumber(LNWIZTTS
ATTACHMENT A
`SAMPLE RECEIPT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION
`bSianmdpelrerselcoeciapttedanndtchhaiIeMnoafrccuhsitveosd.yinformation is documentedinthe binderfor 1sreport(FACT Tox 108):he.
001184
Pe(tCAuSoNrucmocbaenre2s7ut5o8ns9t3e
ATTACHMENT B PRroTOCOL
aEniveeon.meniPaAlCaTbToourttch Labiratory RequestNumber(LRNMUZTTS
001185
!
n2a M ESnevrviiccoensmental|Technology S ty ph a, Bek _'--
Protocol HFACT-TOX-108
Study Title
Oral (Gavage) Cross-Fostering Study of PFOS in Rats
PROTOCOL
Author Lisa Clemen
Date: June 8, 1999
Performing Laboratory
3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
3M Environmental Laboratory
935 Bush Avenue
.
St. Paul, MN 55106
Laboratory Project Identification wr FACT-TOX-108
IM Environmental Laboratory
page 1010 001186
Protocol HFACT-TOX-108
Study Identification Oral (Gavage) Cross-Fostering Study of PFOS in Rats
Test Material
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid potassium salt (T6295)
Sponsor
3M Toxicology Services - Medical Department 3M Center, Building 220-2E-02 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
Sponsor Representative
Marvin T. Case, D.V.M., Ph.D. 3M Toxicology Services Telephone: 651-733-5180 Facsimile: 651-733-1773
Study Director
Kristen J. Hansen, Ph.D. 3M Environmental Technology and Safety Services Building 2-3E-09 651-778-6018
Study Location(s) In vivo Testing Facility Analytical Testing Laboratory
Argus Research Laboratories, Inc. 905 Sheehy Drive, Building A Horsham, PA 19044 3M Environmental Laboratory Building 2-3E-09 935 Bush Avenue St.Paul, MN 55106
3MEnvironmentalLaboratory
Page2o1l0 009187
Sub-Contract Laboratory
Proposed Study Timetable
Study Initiation Date Study Completion Date
.
Protocol #FACT-TOX-108
Advanced Bioanalytical Services, Inc.
15 Catherwood Road Ithaca, NY 14850
Battelle Memorial Institute 505 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201-2693
. June 08, 1999 June 08, 2000
1. Stuoy'
Oral (gavage) cross-fostering studyof potassium perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in rats.
2. Purpose
"This analytical study is designed to determine levelsofpotassium perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in specimens ofliver and serumofrats. The in-life portion ofthis study was conducted atArgus Research Laboratories, study #418-014. All serum samples will be extracted and analyzed at Advanced Bioanalytical Services, Inc. and all liver samples extracted and analyzed at `Battelle Memorial Institute. Additional analyses maybe performed at the 3M Environmental Laboratory as methods are developed and validated. If additional analyses are performed an amendment to this protocol will be written.
3. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
:
`This study will be conducted in accordance with the United States Food and Drug
Athdamtinainsatlrysaitsioofnt,hGeootedstLmaabtoerraitaolrmyiPxrtaucrteicfeosrSctoanncdeanrtdrsa,tiFoinn,alsoRluublieli2t1y,ChFomRog5e8n,ewiittyh,tahnedexstcaebpitliitoyn
`will not be conducted, and is the responsibilityofthe Sponsor.
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE
The 3M Environmental Laboratory Quality Assurance Unit will review the protocol and audit
study conduct, data, and final report to determine compliance with Good Laboratory Practice
Standards and with 3M Environmental Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures.
The QA Unit at the sub-contract laboratory will audit their study conduct, data, and results report prior to submitting to the 3M Environmental Laboratory.
3M Environmental Laboratory
Page3ofto 001188
Protocol HFACT-TOX-108
5. TestMareriaL 51 Referto Argus Research Laboratory protocol for study #418-014.
6. CONTROL MATRICES 6.1 Identification Rat liver and serum and/or rabbit liver and serum, traceability numbers will be recorded in the raw data andincluded in the final report 6.2 Source Argus Research and/or Sigma Chemical 6.3 Physical Description Rat liverand serum and/or rabbit liver and serum 6.4 Purity and Stability Not applicable 65 Storage Conditions Frozen at -20 C 10 C or 50 C: 10C 6.6 Reserve Matrix A portionofthe control matrix will be retained in the 3M archives for as long as the quality of the preparation affords evaluation, but not longer than ten years following the effective dateofthe final test rule(ifapplicable). 6.7 Disposition Matrices will be retained at the 3M Environmental Laboratory per GLP regulation. Certain matrices (feces, urine, and blood) may be disposed after QAU verification. 6.8 Safety PrecautionsReferto MSDS for chemicals used. Wear appropriate laboratory attire, and follow adequate precautions for handling biological materials and preparing samples for analysis.
7. REFERENCE MATERIAL
7.1 Identification Potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), lot #s 171, 215, or 217
(equivalent lots)
i
7.2 Source 3M Specialty Chemicals
7.3 Physical Description White powder
7.4 Purity and Stability Purity ofPFOS is 99% or greater. Stability has not been
determined.
L
7.5 Storage Conditions Room temperature
7.6
Reserve MaterialA reserve sample from each batch ofPFOS used in this study will be retained as long as the qualityofthe preparation affords evaluation, but not longer
than ten years following the effective dateofthe final test rule (ifapplicable).
7.7 Disposition Unused reference material will be retained for use by the 3M Environmental Laboratory and will be discarded when the qualityofpreparation no longer affords evaluation.
aM Environmental Laboratory
Page 40f 10 001189
Protocol #FAGT-TOX-108
7.8 Safety PrecautionsReferto MSDS for chemicals ised. Wear appropriate laboratory attire, and follow adequate precautions for handling biological materials and preparing samples for analysis.
8. Test System Female rats were used as the test system and were maintained and dosed as described in Argus Research protocol #418-014. Group 1 control animals did notreceivethe test substance while the group 2 treated animals received the test substance at a concentration of 1.6 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks. Refer to Argus Research protocol #418-014 for tabular presentationofdata. Dosing of the female animals in group 2 was continued during mating, gestation, and lactation. Crossfosteringof the pups born to the control dams were randomized,halfof the pups were placed on control dams while the otherhalfwere placed on the PFOS dosed dams. Likewise, the same was done with the group 2 pups. Eachofthese pups will be marked to identify whether they are from control or PFOS dosed dams. 9. SPECIMENAND SAMPLERECEIPT `The 3M Environmental Laboratory will receive homogeneity samples and specimens ofthe following body tissues and fluids from the indicated points in the study. All specimens will be packed on dry ice for shipping.
Body tssue/iuid
Collected
Serum -- Dam and Pup animals Urine and feces - Dam animals Tive-r Dam and Pup animals `Milk Secreting Glands - Dam animals Milk --Damanimals
| At lactation day 14 and terminationofthe study
| After terminationofthe study | At lactation day 14 and
terminationofthe study | At lactation day 14 and
terminationofthe study "Atlactatidoayn 14
Expected # of specimens 60 Dam and 34 Pup | 48 Urine and 48 Feces 0 Dam and 34 Pup
mo
Total numberofexpected specimens: 352 `Total numberoftest animals: 36 `Total numberof control animals: 42 Specimens sent to 3M Environmental Laboratories will be received and tracked according to applicable Standard Operating Procedures.
3M Environmental Laboratory
pagesorio 001190
Protocol HFACT-TOX-108
10. PREPARATORY METHODS
:
10.1 FACT-M-L.1, Extraction of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonaotre Other Anionic Fluorochemical Surfactant from Liver for Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry
10.2 ETS-8-4.1, Extraction of Potassium PerfluorooctanesulfonateorOther Fluorochemical Compounds from Serum or Other Fluid for Analysis Using HPLCElectrospray/Mass Spectrometry
10.3 Ifpreparatory methods other than those listed above are used, an amendment to this protocol will be written. Any deviations from these methods will be documented and included with the study data. +
10.4 Ifanalyses are sub-contracted to other laboratories, an amendment will be written to include their methods and copiesofeach method will be attached to this protocol.
11. ANALYTICAL METHODS 11.1 FACT-M-2.1, Analysisof Fluorochemicals in Liver Extracts Using HPLCElectrospray/Mass Spectrometry 11.2 ETS-8-5.1, Analysisof Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate or Other Fluorochemicals in SerumorOther Fluid Extracts Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry 11.3 Ifanalytical methodsotherthan those listed above are used, an amendment to this protocol will be written. Any deviations from these methods will be documentedand. included with the study data. 11.4 Ifanalyses are sub-contracted to other laboratories, an amendment will be written to include their methods and copiesofeach method will be attached to this protocol.
12.DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES `The numberofspikes/duplicates, useof surrogates, and information on other data quality indicators are included in the analytical methods. In addition, the following criteria will be met:
12.1 Linearity 2098 12.2 Limits of detection/ quantitation
12.2.1 Method Detection Limit (MDL) for PFOS a) Sem: 1.75ppb b) Liver 15ppb
12.2.2 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) ~ Equal to the lowest acceptable standard in the calibration curve
3M Environmental Laboratory
Page 6af 10 001191
Protocol #FACT-TOX-108
12.3 Duplicate acceptable precision <30% for the method 12.4 Spike acceptable recoveries 70% - 130% 12.5 Useofconfirmatory methods Indeterminate samples will be re-analyzed using a
confirmatory method. If a confirmatory method is used, an amendment to this protocol wil be written. 12.6 Demonstration ofspecificity Chromatographic retention time, mass spectral daughter ion characterization.
13. SUB-CONTRACTED ANALYSIS 13.1 All analyses as detailed in this protocol will be performed at 3M Environmental Laboratories, Building 2-3E-09, 935 Bush Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55106, at Advanced Bioanalytical Services, Inc., 15 Catherwood Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, or at Battelle Memorial Institute, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43201-2693. 13.2 An amendment tothisprotocol will be writtenifanalyses are performed at laboratories other than 3M Environmental Laboratories, Advanced Bioanalytical Services, Inc., or Battelle Memorial Institute.
14. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Averages and standard deviations will be calculated. The statistical methods that will be used are described below:
14.1 Data transformations and analysis Data will be reported as the concentration (weight/weight or weight/vol)ofPFOS or metabolite per tissue or fluid.
14.2 Statistical analysis Statistics used may include regression analysis of concentrations over time, and standard deviations calculated for the concentrations `within each dose group. Ifnecessary, simple statistical tests, such as Student'st test, `may be applied to evaluate statistical difference.
15.RePoRT
A report containing all the resultsofthe study will be prepared by the 3M Environmental Laboratory.Ifanalyses are sub-contracted to other laboratories, each laboratory will prepare a report and submit it to the 3M Environmental Laboratory for inclusion in the 3M Environmental Laboratory report. Each report will include, but not be limited to, the following, when applicable:
15.1 Name and addressofthe facility performing the study
15.2 Dates upon which the study was initiatedand completed
15.3 A statementofcompliance by the Study Director addressing any exceptions to Good
Laboratory Practice Standards
:
3M Environmental Laboratory
Page 70110
001197
Protocol #FACT-TOX-108
15.4 Objectives and procedures as stated in the approved protocol, including any changes
in the original protocol
15.5 The test substance identification by name, chemical abstracts number or code number,
strength, purity, and composition or other appropriate characteristics,if provided by the Sponsor
15.6 Stability and the solubility ofthe test substances under the conditions of
`administration, if provided by the Sponsor
15.7 A descriptionofthe methods used to conduct the test(s)
15.8 A description ofthe test system
15.9 Adescriptionofany circumstancesthatmay have affected the quality or the integrity of the data
15.10 TsuhpeernvaimsoeorfytpehresoSntnuedlyiDnivroelcvteodr ianntdhtehsetnuadymesofother scientists, professionals, and
15.11 A description ofthe transformations, calculations, or operations performed on the. data, a summary and analysisofthe analytical chemistry data, anda statementofthe. conclusions drawn from the analyses.
15.12 Statistical methods used to evaluate the data, if applicable
15.13 The signed and dated reports ofeachofthe individual scientists or other professionals involved in the study, ifapplicable
15.14 The location where raw dataand the finalreportare tobe stored
15.15 A statement prepared by the Quality Assurance Unit listing the dates that study inspections and audits were made, and the datesofany findings reported to the Study Director and Management
Ifit is necessary to make corrections or additions to areport after it hasbeen accepted, the changes will be made in the formofan amendment issued by the Study Director. The amendment will clearly identify the partofthe report that is being amended, the reasons for the amendment, and will be signed by the Study Director.
16. LOCATIONOFRaWDATA, RECORDS, AND FINAL REPORT Original data, or copies thereof, will be available at the 3M Environmental Laboratory to
facilitate auditsofthe study during its progress and before acceptanceofthe final report. When the final report is completed, all original paper data, including those items listed below, will be
retained in the archives of 3M Environmental Laboratory for at leastaperiodoftime as specified
bPryorceegduulraetsi.on, and as established by 3M Environmental Laboratory Standard Operating
3M EnvironmentalLabarstory
Pagosorro 001193
Protocol HFACT-TOX-108
16.1 The following rawdataand records will be retained in the studyfolderin the
study/project archives according to 3M Environmental Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures:
16.1.1 Approved protocol and amendments
16.1.2 Study correspondence
16.1.3 Shipping records
16.1.4 Raw data
16.1.5 Approved final report (original signed copy) 16.1.6 Electronic copies ofdata * 16.2 The following supporting records will be retained separately from the study folder in
the archives accordintog 3M Environmental Laboratory Standard Operating
Procedures:
16.2.1 Training records
16.2.2 Calibration records
16.2.3 Instrument maintenance logs
16.2.4 Standard Operating Procedures, Equipment Procedures, and Methods
17. SPECIMEN RETENTION
Spepreicoidomefntsimweillasbespmeaciinfiteadinbeydriengutlhaet3ioMn oErnvaisrloonnmgenatsatlheLaqbuaolriattyoorfytshepecpriempeanraatricohnivaefsfofrodrsa
`evaluation, but not longer than ten years following the effective date ofthe final test rule (if applicable), and as established by 3M Environmental Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures.
18. PROTOCOL AMENDMENTS AND DEVIATIONS
|
5
Planned changes to the protocol will be in the formofwritten amendments signed by the Study Director and the Sponsors Representative. Amendments will be considered as partofthe protocol and will be attached to the final protocol. All changes totheprotocol will be indicated in the final report. Any other changes will be in the formofwritten deviations, signed by the
Study Director and filed with the raw data.
3M Environmental Laboratory
Page 9 of 10 001194
19. ATTACHMENTS
E
19.1 AttachmenAt Preparatory and analytical methods
20. SIGNATURES
Protocol HEACT-TOX-108
I Cu
Marvin T. Case, D.V.M., Ph.D., Sponsor Representative
7 June [772
Date
Lew
&/19/:
Kristen J. Hansen, Ph.D., 3M Environmental Laboratory Study Director Date
3MEnvicnmentalLaboratory
Page 1001 10 001195
Study Title Oral (Gavage) Cross-Fostering Study of PFOS in Rats
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT NO. 1
Amendment Date: August 12, 1999
Performing Laboratory 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
3M Environmental Laboratory 935 Bush Avenue St. Paul, MN 55106
Laboratory Project Identification ET&SS FACT-TOX108 LRN U2779
3M Environmental Laboratory
001196
ProtocAomleFnAdCmTe-nTtOXNo1.081 This amendment modifies the following portion(s) of the protocol: 1. PROTOCOL READS: Section 2.0 states that all liver samples will be extracted and analyzed at Battelle Memorial Institute. AMEND T0 READ: All liver samples will be extracted and analyzed at the 3M Environmental Laboratory. REASON: Due to time constraints, the liver extraction and analysis will be performed at the 3M Environmental Laboratory.
2. PROTOCOL READS: Section 10.0 and 11.0 lst the following methods to use for extraction and analysis:
FACT-M-1.1 "Extractionof Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate or Other Anionic Fluorochemical Surfactant from Liver for Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry" FACT-M-2.1 "AnalysisofFluorochemicals in Liver Extracts Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass
Spectrometry"
AMEND TO READ: The extraction and analytical methods to follow at the 3M Environmental Laboratory are: ETS-8-6.0 "Extractionof Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate or Other Fluorochemical Compounds from Liver for Analysis Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry" ETS-8-7.0 "Analysisof Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate or Other Fluorochemical Compounds in Liver Extracts Using HPLC-Electrospray/Mass Spectrometry" REASON: The extraction and analytical methods FACT-M-L.1 and FACT-M-2.1; respectively, were updated on 07/22/99 to ETS-8-6.0 and ETS-3-7.0. Thesemethodswere updated to replace the extraction solvent ethyl acetate with a different extraction solvent MTBE (methyl tert butyl ether), POAA and Moncester were removedfromthestandardmix, and MSS6 was added to the standard mix. The analytical method was updated to include linear regression with 1/x weightaindnag few `minor changes inthe HPLC 1100 instrument parameters.
aM Environmental Laboratory
001197
Protoc"olaFmAeCnTd-mTeoNXno1t.081
3. PROTOCOL READS: Section 10.4 and 11.4 state thatifanalysesaresub-contracted to other
laboratories an amendment will be written to include their methods.
AMENDTO READ: The extractionandanalytical methods to follow at Advanced Bioanalytical
Services will be attached to the protocol.
"prRoEtAoScOolN: The analytical methodsatthe sub-contractlaboratorywerenot included in the original
4. PROTOCOL READS: Section 12.2.1 b) lists the liver method detection limit as 15 ppb.
AMEND TO READ: The liver method detection limit is 8.50 ppb (ng/g). REASON: The validation supporting methods ETS-8-6.0 and ETS-8-7.0 includes a lower method detection limit for PFOS.
Amendment Approval
= Nh frre TG
Marvin Case, D.V.M., Ph.D., Sponsor Representative
17 hussnt 1920
Date
LL. bo
Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D., Study Director
5/15/95
Date
aM Environmental Laboratory
001198
Study Title Oral (Gavage) Cross-Fostering StudyofPFOS in Rats
PROTOCOL AMENDMENT NO. 2
Amendment Date: September 30, 1999
Performing Laboratory
3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
3M Environmental Laboratory
:
935 Bush Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55106
Laboratory Project Identification ET&SS FACT-TOX108 LIRN U2779
3M Environmental Laboratory
001199
ProtocAomleFnAdCmTe-nTtOXNo1.028 This amendment modifies the following portion(s) of the protocol: 1. PROTOCOL READS: Section2.0 statesthatall liversampleswill be extracted and analyzed at the 3M Environmental Laboratory. AMEND 70 READ: No liver samples will be extracted and analyzed. Reason: Liver results are no longer required.
2. PROTOCOL READS: Section 16 statesthatthe original data, or copies thereof, will be available at the 3M Environmental Laboratory to facilitate auditsofthe study during its progress and before: acceptanceofthe final report. When the final report is completed,all original paper data, including: approved protocol and amendments, study correspondence, shipping records, raw data, approved final report, electronic copies ofdata, training records, calibration records, instrument maintenance logs and standard operating procedures, equipment procedures, and methods will be retained in the archivesofthe 3M Environmental Laboratory. AMEND TO READ: Section 16 states that the original data, or copies thereof, will be available at the 3M Environmental Laboratory to facilitate auditsofthe study during its progress and before acceptance of the final report. When the final report is completed, all original paper data, including: approved protocol and amendments, study correspondence, shipping records, raw data, approved final report, and electronic copiesofdata will be retained in the archives of the 3M Environmental Laboratory. All corresponding training records, calibration records, instrument maintenance logs, standard operating procedures, equipment procdures, and `methods will be retained in the archivesofthe facility performing each analysis. REASON: Clarificationofthe dispositionofarchived recordsifanalyses are performed at a sub-contract laboratory.
3M Environmental Laboratory
001200
ProtocaomleFnAdCmTe-nTtOXN1o0.82
3. PROTOCOL READS: Section 17 states that specimens will be maintaiinntehde 3M Environmental Laboratory
specimen archives.
AMEND TO READ: Specimens will be maintainedinthe 3M Environmental Laboratory specimen archives. All specimens sent to sub-contract laboratories will bereturnedto the 3M Environmental
Laboratory upon completion ofanalysis and submissionofthe sub-contract laboratory(s) final report. Thespecimens will be returned with the following documentation: the signed original chain ofcustody and records ofstorage conditions while at the sub-contract facility.
REASON:
Clarificationofthe dispositionofspecimens and documentation for analyses performed by a `sub-contract laboratory.
Amendment Approval
Marvin Case, D.V.M., Ph.D., Sponsor Representative
fib ff
Kristen J. Hansen, Ph.D., Study Director
Date:
10/5/99
Date
3M Environmental Laboratory
001201
PCerAtSaNroomcbaorres2s7t6o5n3s5t3s
borat ReEenmaovnioueoPsAs(eLGRaNbsToUor2at71t73r9sy
T-- AETTTACHeMeENT C -- A ---- ee------ EXTRACTION AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
ProprietaryandContent
001202
|L.]
ADVANCED
BIOANALYTICAL
SERVICES, INC.
METHOD VALIDATION REPORT
TITLE:
METHOD VALIDATION FOR THE QUANTITATION OF RPAETRFSLEUROURMOBOYCTTAUNREBSOUILOFNOSNPARTAEY(LPCFO/SM)SIN
!
DATE:
26 August 1999
REPORT: 99VDJA0L.MLDOC
AUTHORS:
PREPARED
FOR:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
David J. Anderson, M.S.
Amie J. Prince, B.S.
Holly D. Ross, M.S.
3M Environmental Technology and
Safety Services
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 50
001203
15 Catherwood Road = Ithaca. New York 14850 (607) 266-0665 Fax (607) 266-0749
AUTHORS:
FOR:
DATE: TITLE:
David J. Anderson, M.S. `Amie J. Prince, B.S. Holly D. Ross, M.S.
3M Environmental Technology and Safety Services
26 August 1999
METHOD VALIDATION FOR THE QUANTITATION `OF PERFLUOROOCTANESULFONATE (PFOS) IN RAT SERUM BY TURBO ION SPRAY LC/MS
ABSTRACT
A sensitive, specific, accurate, and reproducible analytical method was developed by Advanced BioAnalytical Services, Inc., Ithaca, New York to quantitate perfluorooctancsulfonate (PFOS) in rat serum samples. Serum samples (50 uL) were extracted by a liquid-liquid extraction procedure to isolate the analyte from rat
serum. Sample extracts were reduced to dryness, reconstituted, and analyzed by turbo
ion spray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) in the negative ion
mode. The assay demonstrated a lower limit of `quantitation (LLQ)of 0.05 pg/mL using 50-uL sample aliquots. The calibration curves were fit from 0.05 pg/mL to
20 pg/mL for PFOS by a weighted (1/y') quadratic equation. The coefficients of
determination ofthe calibration curves ranged from 0.9962 to 0.9965.
Precision and accuracy quality control (QC) samples were prepared at concentrations
1
00.2, 6, and 18 pg/mL PFOS. Quality control (QC) samples were prepared at a
concentration of 100 g/mL PFOS for partial volume analysis. The intra- and inter-
!
assay precision (RSD) results calculated from all QC samples ranged from 1.92% to
i
487% for PFOS. The intra- and inter-assay accuracies (RE) calculated from QC
!
samples ranged from -3.58% to 5.58% for PFOS. The mean extraction recoveries
were from 87.6% to 100% for PFOS and 89.9% for the internal standard as).
PFOS was measured as stable inrat serum for up to 24 hours at ambientemperature.
PFOS
-
was
measured
as
stable
in
rat
serum
at
~20
C,
currentlyviene
for
up
to 33 days, and
man ABONvAENCTED
SERVICES, INC.
Prgezors
ssvoimo1 m00C
001204.
.
,
-- rafetienrjetchtreede2f7reheozuer/sthaafwtecryicnlietsi.al Rreelcoinasbtlieturteisounl.ts were obtained for sample extracts
IM ASDoViANnCsEDca SERVICES. INC.
Page 3of30
001205 99VDIAOLMLDOC
QAU STATEMENT Periodic inspectionsofthe method validation for the quantitation of PFOS in rat Sseerrvuimcewser(eABcSo)ndfuocrtceodmbplyitahnecQeuwailtihtyEAPsAsuGraLnPcereUgnuiltatoifonAsdv(4a0ncCeFdRBiPaorAtna7l9y2t)i.cal The study was inspected on the following dates: 13,21 May 1999; 7,8, 14,15 June 1999;1, 2 July 1999;3, 4 August 1999. Resultsofthe inspections were reported to ABS Management on: 13,21 May 1999; 7,8, 14, 15 June 1999;1,2 July 1999; 3, 4 August 1999. Resultsofthe inspections were reported to the Study Director on 5 August 1999, Based on the inspections and the data reviewed, this report is a complete and accurate representationofthe data.
Hak Cormack, B.S.
Date
Quality Auditor
.
--_--
MW ASov2an5ce0n ,
SeRvICES. INC
Page sorso
001206
OO
ssvoIROILMIDOC
TITLE:
Report Number:
Baoedins
SIGNATURE PAGE
METHOD VALIDATION FOR THE QUANTITATION OF PERFLUOROOCTANESULFONATE (PFOS) IN RAT SERUM BY TURBO ION SPRAY LC/MS
99VDIA0L MLDOC
David J. Andegfon, M.S. Research Scientist
24, hutusT 1979
Date
Reviewed by:
+ 1 (2
t
ithleen Cormack, B.S.
Associate Auditor
2644299
Date
Authorized for
Release by:
ofr--
John R/Perkins, Ph.D. Assistant Scientific Director
2 1g ar.55
Date
001207
s-- ec-- aaovanc-- en ----------
Mm Services,GLIK.E
PagSeof 0
99VDIAOLMLDOC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
QAU STATEMENT wots
A
SIGNATURE PAGE worsens
TAOFBCONLTENETS w.covssssssssnsnsomssssonn
|
LOIFTAS BLEST ...
LIST OF FIGURES..coesrseresnssssssssmssmssssssssmssmssmssssssssd
i
1 INTRODUCTION ccna 10
2. EXPERIMENTAL sss
10
2.1. CHEMICALS ANDMATERIALS tse 10
2.2. LC/MS INSTRUMENTATION ccs 10
2.3. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE crv | 1
2.4.RATSERUM VALIDDAATTA ION rss11
2.5. ASSAY EVALUATION cocoon 12
|
2.5.1.Intra:andINEr-ASSaY ACCIACY vores
12
i
2.5.2. Intra: ad INMET-AS5aY PIECISION corse 12
2.5.3. Partial VOIMEARBLYSIS costs
12
H
2.5.4. Lower Limit of QUANKation (LLQ) errs
3
2.5.6. CaITYOVEr EVANRHON co.
13
2.6. STABILITY OF PFOS IN QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES crc
13
26.1. Ambient-Temperature Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum...
13
2.6.2. Freezer Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum at ~20 *Cooercrrrrrcnics 14.
2.6.3.Freeze/Thaw Stability inRat Serum...
1
27. REPRODUCIBILITY OF REINJECTING EXTRACTED SAMPLES...
14
2.8. EXTRACTION RECOVERY consists 14
3. RESULTSAND DISCUSSION wcorrnrnnssnnivses15
LL. [LEE 001208 3.1. ASSAY EVALUATIONRESULTS cosmo 16
3.1.1. Intra: and Inter-ASSay ACGUTRY corre 16
-_--
ABIDOVAANNACLYETDICAL
Pagesof 0
99VDIADLMLDOC
3.1.2. Intra and Inter-ASSay PRECISION ccm 16
3.14. Partial VOTE ARBIYSIS....cororssseosssssonronsn 16 3.1.5. Lower Limit ofQUANGatON (LLQ) wrens 17
3.1.7. CAITYOVEr EVAIAUON ccm|]
3.2. STABILITY OF PFOS IN QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES ccm 17
3.2.1. Ambient Temperature StabilityofPFOS in Rat Serum .........oov......17
3.2.2. Freezer Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum at ~20 C
18
3.2.3. Freeze/Thaw Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum...
18
3.3. REPRODUCIBILITY OF REINJECTING EXTRACTED SAMPLES crc 18
3.4. EXTRACTIONRECOVERY ws18
4: CONCLUSIONS...
19
5. DATARETRIEVAL ums: 19
6. REFERENCES...
19
9. (APPFPOESN)DIINXRAA:TQSUEARNUTMITBAYTTIUONRBOOFIPOENRSFPLRUAOYROLOC/CMTSANr ESUo LFOc NAT. E 37
e--e------------------------------------------
LE ADVANCED
Page 050
SHVDIAILMIDC
SERVICES. INC.
001209
LIST OF TABLES
i
Table I: Intra-Assay Accuracy and Precisionofthe PFOS Assay in Rat Serum for
i
Table 2:
IQntCerS-aAmspsalyesAcfcruormaTchyraenedVaPrleicdiastiioonn
of the RUDS
PFOS Assay in Rat Serum creer
for 21
Table 3: ASctcaunrdaarcdysafnrdoPmreTchirseieonVoaflitdhaetiPoFnORSUDASss.a.y.i.n.R.a.t.SeewreurmofroromCanlmibormatsieon 22
Table 4: Calibration Curve Parameters for PFOS in Rat SERUM vcore. 23
Table S: Partial Volume Analysis of POS in Rat SERUM...
26.
Table 6: Lower Limit of Quantitation of POS in Rat Serum...
25
Table 7: Ambient-Temperature Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum After 24 Hous........26
Table 8: Freezer Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum at -20 C cvs 27
Table 9: StabilityofPFOS in Rat Serum After Three Freeze/Thaw Cycles ..............28
Table 10: R2e7prHooduurcsibiinliRtEyCoOfNRSeHitnjUeOcNtiSngOEMxtHraOctNed.Sa.m.pl.es.C.onrtaeirnirngrPrFOeSrasftesr n 29
Table 11: Extraction Recovery of PFOS OM Rat SEM...
30.
re eertte ememeeeeer eeeeeee tment
Mm ADSIVDAANNACLEYDTICAL
Page 8 of SO
99VDJAOLMLDOC 001210
SERVICES. INC.
LIST OF FIGURES
1
Figure 1: Full-Scan Single MS Mass Spectrum OfPFOS ovr 31 Figur2e: Full-Scan Single MS Mass Spectrumof Tetra-H-PFOS cc. 3 Figure 3: Mass Chromatograms ofPFOS and its Internal Standard in Control Blank
Figure
4:
MIantsesrnCalhrSotmaandtaorgdraOmnslyof(ZPF70OSSAinDaIRaEt)S.er.u.m
Extract
Sample
Containing 34
Figure
5:
MCaosntsaCinhirnogmaPtFoOgSra(m0s.o05fCpagl/imbLr)atainodn
Standard 1 the Internal
in Rat Serum Extract Standard .....................35
Figure
6:
Mass Chromatograms Containing PFOS (20
of Calibration Standard pg/mL) and the Internal
10 in Rat Sandard
Serum Extract wr...
36
-_--
am aN ovaS ncenS SERVICES. INC.
Page9ofsn
59VDIAGLMLDOC 001211
1. INTRODUCTION
The purposeofthis report is to describe the method validation for the quantitative determination ofperfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in rat serum samples after modificationof a previous method (1). The objectives of the method validation were to validate a simple extraction procedure, determine the lower limitof quantitation for routine analysis, determine the extraction recoveries of the analyte and internal standard (IS), determine the analyte stability in rat serum at ambient temperature, long-term freezer storage, and over three freeze/thaw cycles, and to provide specific, accurate, and reproducible quantitative results by turbo ion spray liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS).
2. EXPERIMENTAL
21. CHEMICALS AND MATERIALS
Periluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS, Lot# 171) was obtained from 3M, Inc. The internal standard (IS) for PFOS was 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (Tetra-HPFOS). The intemal standard (Loti $9909) was obtained from 3M, Inc. A detailed listof chemicals and materials is found in Appendix A.
Stock and working solutions which were used to prepare the calibration curves for
fe
the analytes were prepared as described in Appendix A. Stock solutions used in the
preparationofquality control (QC) samples were prepared separately from those used in preparationof the calibration curves.
Preparationofall solutions used during extraction and analysis are described in Appendix A.
22. LC/MS INSTRUMENTATION
`The liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry system consistedof two LC-10AD pumps (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD 21046), a SCL-10A pump controller (Shimadzu,
M2 ADV0ANCEDea
SERVICES. INC
fase 100r0
59VDIAOL MLDOC 001212
Columbia, MD 21046), a WISP 717plus autosampler (Waters Associates, Millipore
Corporation, Milford, MA 01757), a Betasil C,q (2 x 50 mm, 5 um) column
(Keystone Scientific, Inc., Bellefonte, PA 16823), and a PE SCIEX API 365 mass
spectrometer (PE SCIEX, Concord, Ontario). A detailed listof the instrumentation
!
and instrument conditions is found in Appendix A.
2.3. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
For each analytical run (tray), duplicate 50-uL aliquots of the calibration curve samples were prepared as described in Appendix A. The nominal (theoretical) concentrations of PFOS in the calibration curves were 0.05, 0.1,0.25,0.5,1,2,4,8,
16, and 20 pg/mL.
Rat serum quality control samples were prepared in advanceofthe validation study
at nominal (theoretical) concentrations of 0.2, 6, and 18 pg/mL for QC1, QC2, and
QC3, respectively, as detailed in Appendix A. A dilution QC (QC4, 100 pg/mL) was prepared at a concentration exceeding the upper limit of the calibration curve range
(20 pg/mL), and was assayed using a 10-fold dilution for partial volume analysis.
Calibration standards and QC samples were extracted by the procedure detailed in
Appendix A.
2.4. RAT SERUM VALIDATION DATA
"The data were collected using selected ion monitoring (SIM) turbo ion spray LC/MS
in the negative ion mode. Peak areas were integrated by the PE SCIEX program
MacQuan, version 1.4, residing on a Macintosh computer. Following peak area
b
integration, the results tables from MacQuan were saved as text files and uploaded to
the Advanced BioAnalytical Services (ABS) file server where a weighted an)
quadratic regression was performed using the software package Watson v 5.3.1.01
(PSS, Inc., Wayne, PA 19087). All data were rounded to no less than three
significant figures by ABS prior to reporting in Tables 1 through 11. The data for
em the rat serum validation are stored in ABS Notebook 2304.
mn spe
gett ot50
Services. nC
o0m13| soviAol MLC
Al calculations were based on the peak area ratioofthe analyte to the intemal
ik
standard. Concentrations ofeach analyte in quality control samples were determined
by inverse prediction from the calibration curve.
25. ASSAYEVALUATION
251. Intra and Inter-Assay Accuracy
The intra- and inter-assay accuracy ofthe method was assessed by determining the relative error observed in the analysisof quality control samples. The mean concentration for each quality control level was divided by the theoretical concentration. One was subtracted from the result, converted to percent and
expressed as RE. QC through QC3 were assayed in replicatesoffive. In addition,
the RE was reported for standards at all levels over three runs.
252. Intra- and Inter-Assay Precision
`The intra- and inter-assay precision of the method was assessed by determining the Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) observed for quality control sample data. The
`mean concentration and RSD were calculated for the first run and over three runs for
intra-assay and inter-assay precision, respectively. QC1 through QC3 were assayed in replicatesoffive. In addition, the RSD was reported for standards at all levels
over thre runs.
2.53. Partial Volume Analysis
The effectofdilution on the analysis of PFOS in rat serum was determined by partial
volume analysis. QC4 (100 pg/mL) was prepared containing PFOS at approximately
five times the upper limit of quantitation (ULQ). Five replicates of QC4 were
diluted ten-fold and analyzed. The RSD and RE were reported.
-
mam s ADVo ANCmED SERVICES. INC
Page 120050
002s
99VDIA0LMLDOC
|
254. Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLQ)
Rat serum control samples from six separate individuals were spiked with PFOS ata concentrationof 0.05 g/mL. The LLQ was determined by obtaining the backcalculated concentrations from these control samples. The overall mean, RSD, and RE were also calculated.
255. Selectivity
The selectivity of the assay was determined by LC/MS. To monitor for interference
3
from the biological matrix, rat serum samples containing neither the analyte nor the
:
internal standard (control blank) were assayed with all experiments.
i
256. Carryover Evaluation
b
`The carryoverofanalyte from one injectionto the next was assessed by analyzing a control blank injected immediately after a high calibration standard (STD10,
20 pg/mL).
2.6. STABILITY OF PFOS IN QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
QC through QC3 were used to determine the stabilityofthe analyte during sample storage, extraction, and analysis.
261. Ambient-Temperature Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum
The stabilityof POS was evaluated by storing QC samples at each concentration level at ambient temperature (ca. 25 C) for nominal timepointsof0, 2.5, 6, and 24 hours after thawing. All QCs were assayed in replicates of five.
ue IM 2 ea SERVICES. INC.
Page 130150
99VDIAOLMIDOC
!
001215 |
|
262. Freezer Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum at -20 C
The freezer stabilityof PFOS was evaluated by storing QC samples at each
|
concentration level at 20 C for 7, 13, and 33 days. Additional freezer stability
imepoints wil be reported in an addendum to this report. All QCs were assayed in
replicates of four.
263. Freeze/Thaw Stability in Rat Serum
The stability of PFOS was evaluated afterthree freeze/thaw cycles. The mean concentrationsofthe QC samples afer three freeze/thaw cycles (ie. atleast 2 hours
j
frozen storage at the nominal temperatureof ~20 C followed by thawingatambient
|
temperature for 30 minutes) were compared to the mean concentrations of freshly
i
thawed QC samples. All QCs were assayed in replicates of five.
i4
i
27. REPRODUCIBILITY OF REINJECTING EXTRACTED SAMPLES
i
The reproducibility of rejecting reconstituted serum extracts was investigated by
|
reinjecting a set of previously-assayed standards and QC samples which had been
stored afte injection at approximately 25 C for 27 hours. The REofthe QC
4
I
Samples was used to assess processed sample stability in the reconstitution solution
] ]
All QCs were assayed in replicates of five
28. EXTRACTION RECOVERY
The extraction recovery ofPOS from rat serum was determined by comparing the
p(peoaskt-aerxetararcati)owi(tPhAtRh)eoPfsAaRmopflesasm(p0l2e5s,s4p,iaknedd b1e6foprge/emxLt)rascptiikoend(parfet-eerxetxrtarcatc)t.ioTnhe
internal standard was spiked post-extraction for all samples. The recovery of the
t25ethmearesfetraenndcaer.d (T4hpege/xmtLra)ctwiaosn raescsoevsseerdy (fo%llRoewcionvgearys)imwialasrdaeptperromaicnhedusbiyngdiPvFidOiSng
he pre-cxtract PAR by the post-extract PAR and expressing the result 52
percentage. Five replicates were used at each concentration level.
ee
MW ASDVoANSCErD ea Page 14 of50
S9VDIAOLMLDOC
Services. INC
|
001216
|
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A quantitative analytical procedure using turbo ion spray LC/MS in the negative ion mode was developed to meet the high sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility requirements for the determination of PFOS in rat serum. The full-scan single MS mass spectrum of PFOS showed an abundant [M-K]' ion at m/z = 499 (Figure 1).
The full-scan single MS mass spectrumof Tetra-H-PFOS showed an abundant
(M-H] ion at m/z = 427 (Figure 2).
The following selected ion monitoring (SIM) was used to quantify the analytes in rat serum:
PFOS Tetra-H-PFOS (IS)
m/z =499.0 mz=427.0
The peak labelingoffull-scan data does not accurately represent the performance of
the instrument in SIM mode. The SIM ions were derived from separate experiments using narrow-range scanning, which more accurately depicts the operationofthe
instrument in the SIM mode. The mass chromatogramsof a representative control
blank rat serum extract are shown iri Figure 3. Mass chromatograms ffom a representative control rat serum extract containing only the intemal standard (zero sample), are shown in Figure 4.
Figures and 6 are mass chromatogramsofrepresentative extracts from calibration
standards 1 and 10, respectively.
.
3
/
k
;
iji
i
eeeer----------------------------------001217
MW A2 CvA2 NCEDa sc 15050
ssvDiADLMLDOC
Services. INC
31. ASSAY EVALUATION RESULTS
311 Intra- and Inter-Assay Accuracy
The intra-assay accuracy (RE) data from QC samples ranged from -2.35 10 5.58% for
5
PFOS (Table 1). The inter-assay accuracy ranged from -3.58 to 4.95% for PFOS
Eg
(Table 2). These data indicate acceptable intra- and inter-assay accuracy for the
i
determinationofPFOS in rat serum.
H
312. Intra- and Inter-Assay Precision
I
`The intra-assay precision data (RSD) ranged from 1.99 to 3.28% for PFOS at all QC
)1
concentration levels (Table 1). The inter-assay precision results from QC samples
li
ranged from 1.92 to 4.87% for PFOS (Table 2). The RSD ranged from 0.613 to
4.38% for calibration standards at all levels (Table 3). These data indicate acceptable:
4
intra-and inter-assay precision for the determinationofPFOS in rat serum.
I
313. Linearity
i}
The calibration curves werefit by a weighted (1/y') quadratic regression.
B|i
Coefficientsof determination (r") were 20.9962 for PFOS in rat serum. The
i
calibration curve statistics are shown in Table 4.
314. Partial Volume Analysis
i;
The resultsofpartial volume analysis of QC4 is shown in Table 5. The precision
J
(RSD) of QC4 samples diluted1 in 10 was 2.71%. The accuracy was 5.89%. These
data indicate acceptable accuracy and precision for partial volume analysis for the
determinationofPFOS in rat serum.
|
IM A2DVA2NCEaD SERVICES. INC.
Page 160150
|
001218
99VDIADLMIDOC
3.15. Lower Limit of Quantitation (LLQ)
`Table 6 shows the lower limitof quantitation (LLQ) data. The serum LLQ
H
experiment demonstrated that 0.05 pg/mL is an acceptable LLQ for PFOS. The
A]
precision (RSD) was 4.95% for PFOS. The RE was 4.57%.
i
it
3.0.6. Selectivity
J
`The assay was specific for PFOS. No chromatographic interferences were observed
in anyofthe control serum samples analyzed (Figure 3). The control blanks and
[|
zero samples did show some evidence of small chromatographic peaks at the
retention times ofthe analyte. These peaks were not quantifiable as they were below
the lower limit of quantitation (LLQ).
FARA Carryover Evaluation
Carryover of PFOS and the IS was evaluated by injectionofan extracted rat serum
control blank following an injectionofan extracted high standard (STD 10). The
response for the small chromatographic peak at the retention time for PFOS was
comparable to the response of a rat serum control blank injected before the high
k
standard. Thus, carryover is negligible for PFOS. There was no evidence of
i
carryover for the internal standard.
3
32. STABILITY OF PFOS IN QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
i
32a
`Ambient Temperature Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum
i
`The resultsof the ambient stability of PFOS in QC samples are shown in Table 7.
`The mean predicted concentrations deviated from -4.45 to 10.5% from the 0-hour
rvaulumes ffoorrualpl tQC24lehvoeulrssaantdatmibmieenpotinttesm.perBaatsuerde.on these data, PFOS was stable in rat
i
TmAB DVANS CED AL
SFAViCES Me
Page 170f SO
001219
99VDIA.OIMLDOC
------
322. Freezer Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum at 20 C The results of the long-term stability of PFOS in QC samples stored at --20 C are
presented in Table 8. The PFOS concentrations deviated from 0-hour values from 2.76 to 12.3% for all QC levels stored up to 33 days.
Resultsoffreezer storage after two, four, and eight months will be reported as an
addendum to this report.
323. Freeze/Thaw Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum `The resultsofthe freeze/thaw stability of PFOS in QC samples after three
freeze/thaw cycles is shown in Table 9. PFOS was stable afer three freeze/thaw
cycles with deviations ranging from ~1.38% to 10.1% from the O-cycle samples for
all QC levels (Table 9).
3.3. REPRODUCIBILITY OF REINJECTING EXTRACTED SAMPLES `The results of reinjecting reconstituted samples containing PFOS after storage for 27 `hours at approximately 25 C in reconstitution solution are shown in Table 10.
Reinjecting processed samples after 27 hours in reconstitution solution was appropriate with RE values ranging from -6.33 to 4.59% at 27 hours for all QC
levels.
34. EXTRACTION RECOVERY `The mean recoveries of PFOSandTetra-H-PFOS are shown in Table 11. The mean
recoveries ranged from 87.6 to 100% for PFOS. The mean recovery for Tetra-HPFOS was 89.9%.
|, AFOvr ANCe ED . SERVICES. INC.
Page 18arso
001220
99VDIAOLMLDOC
4. CONCLUSIONS
The turbo ion spray LC/MS assay procedure for the determination of PFOS in rat serum has proven to be sensitive, specific, accurate, and reproducible. Its high sensitivity allows reliable and reproducible quantitationofPFOS down to a level of 0.05 pg/mL in rat serum based on 50-L samples.
5. DATA RETRIEVAL
`The data for the rat serum validation are stored in ABS Notebook 2304 and in the ABS Archives.
6. REFERENCES
|
1. Advanced BioAnalytical Services, Inc. Report 98AGKPO2 MMM.
1
Analytical Report for the DeterminationofPerfluorooctanoate and
Perfluorooctanesulfonate in Human Serum by LC/MS. Grace K. Poon,
i
Ph.D., David Hardwick, B.S., and Ellen Pace, M.A.T., 6 February 1998.
i
g
MAO2 VANCE5 D
SERVICES. INC
se 190130
|
001221
s3voiao1 Mi00C
7. TABLES Tablel: SIenrturam-AfsosraQy CAccSuarmapclyesand Precision of the PFOS Assay in Rat
3
PFOS Concentration (g/mL)
4
Theoretical Conc. 0Q2C1
QC3
13
i
i
Rung
0210
652
17.9
0202
631
18.0
fi i
0.206
617
16.7
0.205
632
18.0
1
0.194
635
17.3
Mean
0204
634
17.6
RSD (%) RE (%)
293 L177
199
328
5.58
235
RSD = (SD/Mean) x 100
RE = (Mean/Theoretical)-1] x 100
i
g
i
i
001222
ree ee --eeeesee
:
MW A2DV5AN0CE5D , Pase20atso
s9VoINDLMIDOC
SERVICES. INC.
Table2: SIenrtuerm-AfsosrayQACccSuarmapclyesanfdroPmreTchirseioenVoaflitdhaetPioFnORSuAnsssay in Rat
PFOS Concentration (g/mL)
7
oct
C2
C3
:
Theoretical Cone.| 02
6
18
3
Rung
0210
652
7.9
0202
631
180
0206
6.17
16.7
l
0205
632
18.0
0.194
635
17.3
Run 10
0187
644
169
0.186 6.44
17.3
i
0.182
632
17.5
t
0.189
619
18.0
f
0.182
631
17.4
i
Run 11
0.194
617
182
}
0.197
613
17.1
i
0.184
641
176
:
0.192
61s
17.7
0.184
624
17.0
Mean
0193
630
7.5
RSD (%)
487
192
266
RE (%)
3.58
495
27
RSD
RE
== (((MSeDan//MTheeaornex)tic1a0l0)-1]
x
100
i!
1
mamgrt
SERVICES. INC.
Page 21 ofSO
001223 99VDIAOI MLDOC
Tabled: Accuracy and Precision of the PFOS Assay in Rat Serum for
A
Calibration Standards from Three Validation Runs
|
'PFOS Calibration Standard Concentration (g/mL)
Theoretical Conc.
STDS 025
STDS 1
ST4D7| ST8DS
TO20I
Run9 | 0.0483 | 0.0972
0.480| 0942 | 210| 448 | 761 | 158 | 200
|
0.0530] 0.101
0483| 0938 | 213| 455 | 770 | 162 | 109
!
Run 10 | 00.00544921 | [00..1090511
00.447699 || 00..995442 1as 3 | 870857 | [115579|| 210906
i|
Run 11 [00..00551100 | {00..00996905|| 00..225512|| 00.447679|| 00.994485|| 222113 || 445430|| 77..6748|| 11558%|| 220030
|
Mean |0.0511 | 0.0983| RSD(%) | 438 | 265 |
0.25 | 207 |
0.476 | 115
0.945 [0613
| [
214 | 150|
430 | 162 |
7.78| 213 |
115282||
210080
RE(%)| 220| 167 | 0207] 478| 5:53 | 705 | 124| 280| -1.00|0.0764
RRESD==(M(eSaDn//MTheeaonr)etxic1a0l0)-1] x 100
MAS DVANS CEDea
SERVICES. INC.
Page 20050
001224
99VDIALMLDOC
Table4: Calibration Curve Parameters for PFOS in Rat Serum i
Run# Quadratic | Coefficient| Intercept | Coefficient of
Coefficient (AY| Linear (B) () [Determination (r)
i
9
00010769 | 0.13730 | 0.00042009 0.5963
10 00010516 | 0.14535 | 00014910 0.992
:
n
-00012359 | 0.5173 | 0.00088515 0.9964
i
Mean -0.0011215
0.00093206
0.9964
i
2y= AX Bx + C, weighted 1/57
|
|
i
_--
WM S AovaancseD a
SERVICES. INC.
Pag 230050
001225
ssvDI0LMLDOC
Table5: Partial Volume Analysis of PFOS in Rat Serum
PFOS Cone. (ug/mL)
Qc
`Theoretical Conc.
100 Lin 10 dilution)
i ;
Rung
11
110055
110044
RSMDea(n%)
217016
RE (%
589
RSD = (SD/Mean) x 100
RE = [(Mean/Theoretical)-1] x 100
B
i
am boson FY
SERVICES. INC.
Page 24 of50
001226 99VDIA0IMLDOC
Table6: Lower LimitofQuantitation of PFOS in Rat Serum
Run 11
PFOS
i
Theoretical Concentration [Cone. Found (ug/mL)
[
LQ
0.0489
;
(0.05 pg/mL)
0.0499
0.0554
0.0527
0.0520
Mean
0.0523
RSD (%)
495
RE (%)
457
RSD = (SD/Mean) x 100
RE = [(Mean/Theoretical)-1] x 100
||| il | iil
001227
m--a----n--A-- DVA--NC--ED -- |------m--ar--io--------------v-- oi--Mi--00C
SERVICES. INC.
Table7:
Ambient-Temperature Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum After 24 Hours
Run 11
PFOS (ug/ml)
QC
(Theoretical
Conc.) [00H1o9u4r||2.501H8o7ur|| 60H1o7u7r|[
24 Hour 0190
Qc
0197 | 0181 | 0179 | 0187
(02 pg/mL)
0184 | 0184 | 0180 | 0191
0192 | 0180 | 0183 | 0182
0184 | 0178 | 0189 | 019%
Mean
0190 | 0182 | 0182 | 0.188
RSD (%)
3.03 191 252 201
%DEV from 0 Hour NA 420 | 445 -L16
617 617 6.36 655
Qc?
613 630 638 653
i
(6 ugmL)
641 626 635 6385
{
6.15 6.28
622
6.66
1
624 624 6.11 681
|
Mean
622 625 628 668
RSD (%)
182 0797 | 186 2.16
%DEV from 0 Hour NA 0525 | 105 7.42
82 80 1 0
Qc3
17.1 18.0 180 194
(18 pg/mL)
17.6 17.7 176 192
17.7 17.9 182 194
17.0 18.0 18.0 19.7
Mean
175 17.9 180 19.4
RSD (%)
284 | 0719 | 126 119
:
9DEYV from 0 Hour NA 233 239
105
NA: Not Applicable RSD = (SD/Mean) x 100
|
%DEV from 0 Hour = [(X Hour Conc. - 0 Hour Conc.)/0 Hour Conc.) x 100
FE un sovancen
SERVICES. INC.
Page 260150
001228
-- $9VDIAOLMIOOC
i
Table8: Freezer Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum at-20 C
: i
Qc
PFOS (ug/mL)
Concentration Run 2)* Run 6)* (Run 3)** Run 16)
0213
0.225
0.211
0245
cl
0.209
(02 ug/mL)
0.208
0222 0218
0210 0217
0234 0228
0208
0219
0.214
0232
0207
Mean RSD (%)
0.209 124
0221 132
0213 155
0235 3.17
%DEV from OHour| NA
572
184
123
Qc?
6.02 5.71
622 6.15
597 584
645 613
(6 ug/ml)
6.00 6.06
639
6.07
627
5.99
6.58 637
Mean
569 589
626
597
638
RSD (%)
3.08
%DEV from O Hour| NA
162 619
138 120
297 828
QC3
202 186
5.0
188
186
195
182
188
(18 ug/mL)
189 182
198 193
18.8 17.9
187 187
Mean
189 189
94
84
87
RSD (%)
3.96
%DEV from O Hour| NA
137 252
242
0.395
2.76
-130
NA: Not Applicable
RSD = %DEV
(SD/Mean) x 100 from 0 Hou=r [(Conc.
-
0
Hour
Conc.)0
Hour
Conc.]
x
100
i
*From Protocol FACT-TOX-110 **From Protocol FACT-TOX-111
i `
001229
----n--_--_--_--_--
en Aote
SERVICES. INC.
Page 270f50
99VDIAOIMLDOC
Table9: Stability of PFOS in Rat Serum After Three Freeze/Thaw Cycles
Run 10
PFOS (ug/ml)
QC (Theoretical Conc.)
3 Cycles
0187
0.177
Qc
0.186
0177
(02 pg/mL)
0.182
0.185
0.189
0.185
0.182
0.189
Mean
0.185
0.182
RSD (%)
1.70
312
%DEV from 0 Cycle
NA
-138
644
6.59
Qc2
6.44
661
(6 pg/mL)
632
6.44
619
639
631
6.40
Mean
634
645
RSD (%)
166
1.63
%DEYV from 0 Cycle
NA
2.35
!
169
2
Qcs
173
19.1
(18 pg/mL)
17.5
192
18.0
19.6
174
18.7
Mean
174
192
RSD (%)
231
180
DEV from 0 Cycle
NA
10.1
NA: Not Applicable
RSD = (SD/Mean) x 100
%DEV from 0 Cycle = [(3 Cycle - 0 Cycle)/0 Cycle] x 100
mm ive
SERVICES. INC.
Pac 2tors0
001230
s9vI0LMLDOC
--
I
Table 10: RPeFpOroSduacfitberil2i7tyHooufrRseiinnjeRcetcioongstEixtturtaicotneSdoSlautmipolnes Containing
PFOS (g/mL
=0 Hours (Run 10
=27 Hours Run 12)
|!
Qc
0.187
0.187
0.186
0.182
}
(02 pgimL)
0182 0.189
0.188 0.188
Mean
0.182
0.1%
0.185
0.187
RSD (%) RE (%)
1.70
161
7.50
633
Qc2
643
639
644
6.02
(6 ng/mL)
632
619
6.19
6.55
631
622
Mean RSD (%)
634
628
166
323
i
RE (%)
562
459
|
169
173
|
(18Qucg/3ml)
1177..35
1188.21
i
|
18.0 174
173 17.6
| !
Mean
RSD (%)
17.4
231
2174.07
!I
RE (%) A: Not Applicable
329
173
!
RRESD==(M(eSaDn//TMheeaonrx)etc10a0l-1] x 100
i}
001221
ee ------------------------------------------
man assy
Page 29050
99VDIAOLMLDOC
SERVICES. INC.
Table11: Extraction Recovery of PFOS from Rat Serum
Theoretical Conc.| Pre-Extraction Post-Extraction
emg spregestp ts i] PFOS Spike | (0.25 pg/mL)
Run 14
Mean
PFOS Spike 2 (4 pg/mL) Run 14
0.03160 0.02850 0.02930 0.02790 0.03050 0.4597 04751 04776 0.4724 04772
0.02880
110
0.03010
94.7
0.02950
993
0.02930
952
0.02960
103
0.02946
100
05270
872
0.5304
896
0.5335
89.5
0.5298
892
05392
885
New ws PFOS
T645
Spike 3
1.679
(16 pg/mL)
L719
Run 14
1.535
1612
1874
380
1857
90.4
1.869
920
1.887
814
1.364
86.5
eam 575 Tetra-H-PFOS Spike IS (4 pg/mL) Run13
0.4068 03884 0.4043 03921 0.4078
0.4460
512
0.4423
87.8
0.4445
910
04512
86.9
0.4412
924
Vea 295 "(individual Response forPre-Ext./Individual Response for Post-Ext) x 100
[1]SNC ot
SERVICES. INC
Page 30of 50
001232 99VDJAOLMILDOC
-
8. FIGURES
Figure 1: Full-Scan Single MS Mass Spectrum of PFOS
Senin rrosar
" = "
g
g EC)
32 ow
Po.
u u
. p
MET
1"
I"
7
0
449
= -=
=
'
=
001233
[iS.ooaee s
moooo
Figure 2:
Full-Scan Single MS Mass Spectrumof Tetra-H-PFOS
5 5
"
n n gs P e 2Tow 3iw
Speci fom TeraH-PFOS QI
Losers ar
MH]
]
2
i|
PM
J
0
x
i
"0
1
s
3%
me )
0
| AF DVAR NCEDR Services. INC.
Page 32050
001234
99vDIADLMLDOC
Figure3:
Mass Chromatograms of PFOS and its Internal Standard in Control Blank Rat Serum Extract
me = 270
10763en
%
0
n
0
0
2
Pg O)
i:
1
23 we = 4590
I3 w
E)
0
"
0
0
2 Tin, min 3
: 3stc2cms
1
z Time, min 3
`
All quantitation results and figures were prepared from nom-smoothed data.
ABmriosve TeaH.2FOS (15)
Iomnz =4990 miz= 4270
R3e1tenionTime 29
001235
ee------------------------------
IM ASDVo ANCsED Rea rages3ar50
59VDIAOLMLOOC
SERVICES. INC.
Figure 4: Mass Chromatograms of PFOS in a Rat Serum ExtractSample
Containing Internal Standard Ouly (Zero Sample)
me =an0
23a pn
50
wo
o
50
"
P)
o g w
3
i
7 Tine mia 3
:
]]
3 mz 90
rtezeps
HE
=0
1
o
]
"
5
n2
p
0
}
wo
;
] Tie, min 3
:
Allquantitation results nd figures were prepared from non-smoothed dats.
pTeargaeH.PEOS (15)
wa a4m27o0
S25 pel
001236
MMR, ro
SERVICES. ING
avon sooc
FigureS: Mass Chromatograms of Calibration Standard 1 in Rat Serum
Extract Containing PFOS (0.05 g/mL) and the Internal
Standard
me = 4220
sas
0 0
n
@
0
"
g
:
ii
i
3 meen
i3 w
7 Time, min 3
:
nae
no
0 "
0
10
i
2 Tire, min 3
:
All quantitation results and figures were prepared from non-smoothed data.
APnRaOSle
lomnz =499.0
R3e1tentionTime.
Teaa HPFOS (IS)
miz=4270
29
001237
mBo IOANs ALYTICAL SERVICES. INC.
Page3sofso
59VDIADLMLDOC
T=
Figure 6:
Mass Chromatograms of Calibration Standard 10 in Rat Serum
-- sstess Extract Containing PFOS (20 pg/mL) and the Internal Standard
0 w Cw
2
i
;
I
3
T
3
"Time, min
3
i
wz =4990
5.14eS cps
|
HES
a
|
n
60
"0
:
w
0
0
PO oTesrme 7F05 19
T
7 Ties min 3
T
----------
=as-iaasn00
Sonion Tine
001238
NN 050, ree
[Eo
9. APPENDIAX:QUANTITATION OF PERFLUOROOCTANESULFONATE (PFOS) IN RAT SERUM BY TURBO ION SPRAY LC/MS
AUTHORS:
David J. Anderson, M.S. Amie J. Prince, B.S. Holly D. Ross, M.S.
| TABLE OF CONTENTS
ALO CRMC SIUCTUIE(S) rnin:38
i
A20 Specimen(s).... om--------"
ABO ASSRY PEICIDIE ors:38
FT
------
38
ASO CHEMIE orcs: 38
A60 MataendrEQiUIaPMlIEsNL.......mrrsssnsssnsssnnsnnns39
ATO PrepOafSrOMaHOtNSion rss
A80 Preparationof Quality ControlSAMPIES....vrrsssssrre 8S
A90 Liquid-liquid EXIraction PrOCEQUIE vrs 46
A100 INSUUMENE CONBIONS worseT
ALLO CalCUlBONS corms
49
001279
Sn --o ----m----B--OW--A--N--CE--D--------p--ea--n------------------so--in--s eotC
SERVICES. INC.
A1.0 CHEMICAL STRUCTURE(S)
i CF-- iok
Posium Perfioroosancsulonte
i Cf G--G--S--OH
FER, i
o
IH, IH, 2H, 2H-Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid
MW =428, Tntemal Standard
A2.0 SPECIMEN(S) This assay uses S0-uL aliquots of rat serum. Rat serum samples are stored at -20 C.
A3.0 ASSAY PRINCIPLE PFOS and its internal standard, Tetra-H-PFOS, are extracted from rat serum samples (50 uL) using a liquid-liquid extraction procedure. The organic layer is evaporated to dryness and then reconstituted. An aliquot is then analyzed by turbo fon spray. liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) in the negative ion mode.
A4.0 COMPOUNDS PFOS: Lot# 171, 99.976% purity, 3M, Inc., Minneapolis, MN. Tetra-H-PFOS: Lot 59909, 90% purity, 3M, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.
AS0 CHEMICALS
All chemicals may be substituted with thatofan equivalent manufacturer and grade
of chemical.
001240
Nm AEDOVAANNACLEYDTICAL SERVICES. INC
Page 38of 50
----
99VDIAOIMIDOC
Acetonitrile Ammonium Acetate Ethyl Acetate Methanol Rhodapex mass calibration solution
Sodium Bicarbonate Sodium Carbonate, Annhydrous Tetrabutylammonium Hydrogen Sulfate: Water
Rat Serum Rat Serum
MCauts#ke0g1o5-n4,,MBIur4d9i4c4k2& Jackson, Cat 24,019-2, Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI 53201 Cat 100-4, Burdick & Jackson, Muskegon, MI 49442 Cat 230-4, Burdick & Jackson, Muskegon, MI 49442 A(LTm.ixBtaukreer,ofPh0i.l1l1ipmsbMurgt,riNflJuor0o8a8c6e5t)ic, a0c.i5d2 m11M0 aRnhdod|ampeMx ACOB-E4X36E,P1-1m2M0 (AalBl tEhXreeEPsCurpapnlbiuerdy,byNJRh0o8n5e1-2P)ouilne1n:c1, Inc. methanol:water. Cat 3509-01, 1.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 Catt 3604-01, J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 HPLC Grade, Cat# 1360-07, J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 HMiogdhelPuDr7it3y31(NUAlNtOrpapuurree)W,aBtaemrsStyesatdem, Dubuque, IA 52001 Lampire Biological Laboratories, Piperville, PA 18947 HIandrilaannapBoiloipsr,oIdNuc4t6s2f2o9r Science, Inc.,
A60 MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT Mass Spectrometer PtaEnSdeCmIEtrXipAlePqIu3a6dr5uaptomloesmpahesrsicsppercetsrsoumreeteironeiqzuatiipopned with TurbolonSprayTM interface, PE SCIEX, Concord, Ontario L4K 4V8
Data system
A1P.I3,SMtaancdDaArdDSvof1t.w3a,rBeu,nMdalecrQvua1n3,vM1u.l4t,iLvCi2eTwuvn1.e3v, 009549 :
MW ASDV2AN0CE5D ea SERVICES. INC.
Page 39050
99VDIADLMLDOC
and Sample Control v 1.3, on a Power Macintosh, PE
SCIEX, Concord, Ontario L4K 4V8
HPLC Pump
Shimadzu LC-10AD pump, Shimadzu Co., Columbia, MD 21046
:
LC Pump Controller Shimadzu SCL-10A, Shimadzu Co., Columbia, MD
21046
Autosampler HPLC Column
`Waters 717plus, Waters Associates, Millipore Corporation, Milford, MA 01757 Betasil Cy, 5 um particle size, 2.1 x 50 mm, Cat
#852055-701, Keystone Scientific, Inc., Bellefonte, PA 16823
Harvard syringe
pump 11
Harvard Apparatus Inc., South Natick, MA 01760
Multi-tube vortexer
Cat# 5816-115, VWR Scientific, West Chester, PA 19380
Balance
PH Meter
Mechanical shaker NANOpure-UV/
swaytsetrempurification
Model FX-300, AND Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Model 340, Corning Inc., Coming, NY 14830
Cat# 6000, Eberbach Corp., Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Bamstead, Dubuque, IA 52001
Microbalance
Model MT-5, Mettler-Toledo Inc., Hightstown, NJ 08520
Micro weigh boats
Cat# 0219-0041, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT 06859
Weigh boats
Cat# 12577025, VWR Scientific, West Chester, PA 19380
Sorvall RT-6000D refrigerated
centrifuge
Cat# 83071, DuPont Co., Wilmington, DE 19898
Beckman GS6KR Refrigerated
centrifuge
Beckman, Palo Alto, CA 94304
001242
----e-- ee------------------
m,nABDIVDAANNACLEYTDICAL
Pope soerse
99VDIADLMLOOC
SERVICES. NC
TurboVap LV Evaporator Pipettes
Pipette tips
Polypropylene tubes
Screw-capped Polypropylene vials Screw-capped Polypropylene vials Plug Tite Multipurpose Caps Pyrex volumetric flask Solvent Filtration Apparatus
Nylon Titan Membrane Filters PEEK tubing
Liquid Nitrogen
Gastight Glass Syringes
0C1a7t4843750, Zymark Instruments, Hopkinton, MA
Catt Co.,
PW-o5b0u00m,,PM-1A0000,18P8-8200,
P-100,
Rainin
Instrument
RT-20, Rainin
RT-200, C-5000, CP-25, Instrument Co., Wobum,
CP-50, CP-250, MA 01888
W13esmtmChxest1e0r0,mPmA', C1a9t3#8015070-574,VWR Scientific,
16.5 x 28658
57
mm,
Cat#
60.542,
Sarstedt,
Inc.,
Newton,
SC
16.5 x 101 SC 28658
mm,
Cat#
60.541,
Sarstedt,
Inc.,
Newton,
Cat 78-127-0019-100, Worcester, MA 01607
Elkay
Products,
Inc.,
C10a0t0,2K8i0m1b4lPe-/1K0o,nt2e8s0,14VPi-n2e5l,an2d8,0N1J4P0-813006,0 28014P-
9C5a3t82965-3070010-,0090503,82975-30705010-,00Ki0m0b,l9e5/3Ko7n5t3e0s0,0V0i,neland, NJ 08360
0.45 um Scientific Resources Eatontown, NJ 07724
Inc.,
Cat#
74547-NN,
0.005" id. x 1/16" 0., Cat# Inc. Oak Harbor, WA 98277
1535,
Upchurch
Scientific
Supplied in-house from bulk Buffalo, NY 14210-2005
tank,
BOC
Gasses,
Cat# 1750, Hamilton Company, Reno, NV 89510
Other general laboratory glassware and supplies were used.
001243
s ee ----e ------------sto eeeeeen eeneret
mam ASDVoANaCEDeas
Page "iof0
99VDIAOLMIDOC
--
A7.0 PREPARATION OF SOLUTIONS NANOpure water (18 megaohm-cm.) or equivalent should be used wherever water is called for. Mix al solutions well.
A7.1 PreparationofAnalytical Standard Stock Solutions Analytical Standard Stock Solution, PFOS (1 mg/mL): Weigh approximately 5 mg ofPFOS (after correction for purity) on a microbalance and transfer it to a polypropylene vial. Dilute with the appropriate volumeofmethanol to yield a | mg/mL solution. Prepare a fresh solution every three months. Store the solution at 4C and bring to ambient temperature before use.
Standard Spiking Solutions Prepare Standard Working SolutionsA through J in 5-mL class "A" volumetric flasks according to the following dilution scheme. Dilute to the S-mL mark with water to yield the final concentration. Prepare fresh solutions every three months. Store the solutions at 4 C and bring to ambient temperature before use.
Standard Volume Spiked Solution Used PFOS Final Conc.
x
1000
Stock
200
B
800
Stock
160
c
400
Stock
80
D
200
Stock
40
E
100
Stock
20
F
250 200 pg/mL (A)
10
G
125 200 pg/mL (A)
5
H
625 200 pg/mL (A)
25
1
500
10 pg/mL (F)
10
1
250
10 ug/ml (F)
05
mam Sin rin OY
SERVICES. INC.
Page 420150
001244 99VDIAOIMIDOC
a A-7.2 Preparation of Internal Standard Stock Solutions faternal Standard Stock Solution, Tetra-H-PFOS (I mg/mL): Weigh approximately 5 mgofTetra-H-PFOS on a microbalance and transfer it to a. polypropylene vial. Dilute with an appropriate volumeof methanol to yield a mg/mL solution. Preparea fresh solution every three months. Store th solution a 4C and bring to ambient temperature before use. A-7.3 Preparation of Internal Standard Working Solution ITnatteerrnnalalStSatnadnadradrSdtoWcokrkSoilnugtiSoanltuotiaon10(04-gmL/mclLassTe"tAr"av-oHl-uPmFeOtrSi)c:flAadskd. 4D0i0lupteLtoof the mark with watetro give 4 ug/mL Tetra-H-PFOS solution. Store the solution at C and bring to ambient temperature before use. Prepare fresh solution as needed, A-7.4 PreparationofStandard Curve and Control Blank Prepare fresh calibration standards for each analytical run by combining 360 uL of rat control serum and 40 wLofthe analytical standard working solution (see table below) in labeled 1.7-mL microtubes. Prepare control blanks and zero samples by combining 360 kLofrat control serum with 40 Lofwater. Vortex each for 60 seconds.
[am Ng gen
SERVICES. INC.
Page 430fSO
001245 99VDIAOI MLDOC
Analytical Standard Dilution Table:
Standar#d Volume Solution to
0
x
9
40
B
8
"0
c
7
"0
D
6
40
E
5
0
F
4
"0
G
3
"0
H
2
40
1
1
"0
1
iL control
360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360
Final Cone.
0 16 8 4 2 1 0s 025 01 005
A75 Preparation of Other Solutions 0.25 M Sodium Carbonate/0.25 M Sodium Bicarbonate: Weigh 26.5 gofsodium carbonate and 21 gofsodium bicarbonate and dissolve in approximately 900 mL of HPLC-grade water. Transfer the solution to a 1000-mL volumetric flask and dilute to the mark with HPLC-grade water. Mix the solution thoroughly. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare a fresh solution every three months.
1M Ammonium Acetate: Add 7.7 g ofammonium acetate to a 100-mL volumetric flask, dissolve in NANOpure water, and sti until completely dissolved. Dilute to the mark with NANOpure water. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare a fresh solution every three months.
2 mM Ammonium Acetate: Combine 2 mL of 1M ammonium acetate and 900 mL NANOpure water in a 1000-mL volumetric flask; tir until completely mixed. Dilute to the mark with NANOpure water. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare 2 fresh solution every three months.
001246
mn AEE
seRvICES. INC
Pagessarso
99vDIA0L MLDOC
10 M Sodium Hydroxide: Add 40 gof sodium hydroxide to a 100-mL volumetric flask, dissolve in NANOpure water, and stir until completely dissolved. Dilute to the `mark with NANOpure water. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare a fresh solution every three months.
1M Sodium Hydroxide: Add 10 mL of 10 M sodium hydroxide to a 100-mL volumetric flask. Dilute to the mark with NANOpure water; sti until completely mixed. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare a fresh solution every three months.
0.5 M Tetrabutylammonium Hydrogen Sulfate, pH 10: Weigh 16.98 g of tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate and dissolve in 40 mL ofNANOpure water. Adjusted the pH to 10.0 with 10 M and 1 M sodium hydroxide. Transfer the solution 102 100-mL volumetric flask and dilute to the mark with NANOpure water.
10:90 Methanol:2 mM Ammonium Acetate (Mobile Phase Eluent A): Add 100 mL of methanol and 900 mL of2mM ammonium acetate to a 1000-mL Pyrex bottle. Mix the solution thoroughly and filter the solution through a 0.45 uM filter with a vacuum flask. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare a fresh solution every three months.
90:10 Methanol:2 mM Ammonium Acetate (Mobile Phase Eluent B): Add 900 mLofmethanol and 100 mL of2mM ammonium acetate to a 1000-mL Pyrex bottle. Mix the solution thoroughly and fier the solution through 2 0.45 uM filter with a vacuum flask. Store at ambient temperature. Prepare a fresh solution every three months.
A8.0 PREPARATION OF QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
A8.1 Preparation of Quality Control Stock Solutions
QC Stock Solution, PFOS (1 mg/mL): Weigh approximately 5 mgofPFOS (after
correction for purity) on a microbalance and transfer it to polypropylene vial. Dilute
001247
mMAEOIVOAANNACLYETDICAL SERVICES. INC
Page 45of SO.
99VDI"AOLMLDOC
i
with the appropriate volumeof methanol to yield a | mg/mL solution. Store the
)
solution at 4 C and bring to ambient temperature before use. Prepare a fresh
solution every three months.
A82 Preparation of Serum QC Samples QC4 (Dilution QC, 100 pg/mL PFOS): Add 1000 uL QC Stock Solution to a 10mL class "A" volumetric flask to yield a 100-ug/mL solution. Dilute to the mark with control serum, cap and mix. Aliquotsofapproximately 0.2 mLareplaced in Polypropylene vials and stored frozen at ~20 C. QC3 (18 pg/mL PFOS): Add 450 uL QC Stock Solution to a 25-mL class "ATM volumetric flaskto yielda 18-ug/mL solution. Dilute to the mark with control serum, cap and mix. Aliquotsofapproximately 0.5 mL are placed in polypropylene vials and stored frozen at ~20 C.
QC2 (6 pg/mL PFOS): Add 150 uLofQC Stock Solution to a 25-mL class "A" volumetric flask to yield a 6-:g/mL solution.Diluteto the mark with control serum, cap and mix. Aliquots of approximately 0.5 mL are placed in polypropylene vials and stored frozen at -20 C.
QC1 (0.2 ug/mL PFOS): Add 111.1 kL of QC3 to a 10-mL class "A" volumetric flask to yield 2 0.2-ug/mL solution. Dilute to the mark with control serum, cap and mix. Aliquotsofapproximately 0.5 mL are placed in polypropylene vials and stored frozen at 20 C.
A9.0 LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION PROCEDURE 21.. TPhreapwarQeCfrsesahmpclaelsi.bration standards for each run according to Section A.7.4. 3. Prepare QC4 samples (diluted1 in 10) in two steps:
2) Add 180uLof control serum and 20 kLofQC# into 1.7-mL microtubes and
001248
mn BR a
Page 46.0150
99VDIADI MLDOC
vortex
b) Aliquot 50 kLofdiluted QC4 into labeled 16 x 100 mm polypropylene tubes. 4. Aliquot 50 uLofeach control blank, zero sample, calibration standard, and
quality control samples 1-3 into labeled 16 x 100 mm polypropylene tubes. Standards and blanks are analyzed in duplicate. All QC samples are analyzed in replicates of five. 5. Add I mLof 0.5M tewrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate, pH 10 to each tube. 6. Add 2mLof0.25 M sodium carbonate/0.25 M sodium bicarbonate to each tube, 7. Add 500 ULofthe Intemal Standard Working Solution to each tube (except control blank, add 500 uL water). 8. AddSmL ethyl acetate to each tube. 9. Shake the tubes on a reciprocal shaker at medium speed for 20 minutes. 10. Centrifuge the tubes at 3000 rpm for 20 minutes at 20 C. 11. Freeze the aqueous phase in an acetone/dry ice bath and keep the tubes in the bath an additional $ minutes. 12. Transfer the ethyl acetate layer to a fresh, labeled 13 x 100 mm polypropylene tube.
13. Evaporate the ethyl acetate layer to dryness in a TurboVapTM at approximately 20C under nitrogen.
14. Reconstitute the dried extracts in two steps: Add 500 uL acetonitrile and vortex for 60 seconds. `Then add 500 uL water and vortex for 60 seconds.
15.Transfer 200 iLof the extract to a labeled polypropylene autosampler vial.
A.10.0 INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS
HPLC Conditions:
Eluent (gradient)
[1] I aA
SERVICES. INC
Mobile Phase A: 10:90 methanol:2 mM `ammonium acetate (v/v) Mobile Phase B: 90:10 methanol:2 mM ammonium acetate (v/v)
001249
Page 470f50
99VDIAOLMI.DOC
Eluent Gradient Conditions:
o Tow T Cw
Flow Rate Autosampler
Autosampler Temperature
Injection Volume
HPLC Column
HPLC Column Temperature
Typical Initial Column Pressure Autosampler Run Time
300 uL/min. Waters 717plus
Ambient
:
3t0SpuL
Keystone Betasil C,q, 5 um particle size, 2.1 mm x 50 mm
Ambient
90 bar
8.0 minutes
Analyte
RepresentativeRetentionTime(minutes)
PFOS
31
Tetra-H-PFOS (IS)
29
Curtain Gas
Nebulizer Gas
"TurbolonSprayTM Temperature TurbolonSprayTM Auxiliary Gas
'UHP Nitrogen
UHP Nitrogen
400C
'UHP Nitrogen at 8 L/min
nm
EO CAL
Page 48 of50.
001250
99VDJA01MI.DOC
Tons Monitored:
Analvie PFOS Tetra-H-PFOS (IS)
IonMonitored mm//zz ==449297..00
Duell Time 550000 mmss
Tonization Mode Ton Spray Voltage
Declustering Potential MS Acquisition Time
Pause Time
Negative lon 3000 V
35V 5 minutes
2ms
Calibrate the mass axisofthe instrument by infusion of Rhodapex mass calibration solution (Section A.5.0) at a low rate of 10 L/min. Optimize the sensitivityofthe instrument using an infusion ofa 10 pg/mL solutionof the analyte at 10 wL/min into a flow of 190 uL/minofmobile phase using the gradient condition at which the analyte elutes from the LC column (100% eluent B). Mass spectral peak widths should be approximately 0.6 amu athalfheight.
One setofcalibration standards was injected at the beginning and one set of calibration standards was injected at the end of each analytical run (tray).
A110 CALCULATIONS
Calculated concentrations are based on peak area ratiosofPFOS to Tetra-H-PFOS. `The peak area for the analyte ion is divided by the peak area for the corresponding internal standard ion.
Data generated from samples in his study were acquired and integrated using PE SCIEX software applications Sample Control (v. 1.3) and MacQuan (v. 1.4). The
validation data were formatted in the ABS laboratory information management
system (Watson, v.5.3.1.01). All data were rounded to no less than three significant
figures by ABS prior to reporting.
001251
MMAD2V3ANSCERDea SERVICES. INC.
meses
| osvoInmamDOC
AccCe ritepriaftor SaampnleAc nalyesis
Calibration standards: The coefficientofdetermination (') must be 20.98. At least three-fourths ofthe individual calibration standard replicates will have deviations `within 15% from their nominal concentrations.
LLQ acceptance criteria: At least one replicate at the LLQ must exhibit a deviation
`within 20% from its nominal concentration.Ifthis criterion is not met, both
replicates are rejected and the standards at the next higher level are subjected to the
same test.
Quality control samples: At least two-thirdsofthe individual QC sample replicates will have deviations within 15% from their nominal concentrations, with at least
one replicate at each QC concentration meeting this criterion.
------rr------------------------------001252
IM SAoovaiNcEFDea
SERVICES. INC.
Pa"s s0t50
VDIVAon DIMLDOC
P(eCrAuSoNruomobctearn2e7s5u8t.o3n8ate ATTACHMENT D DOSE CONFIRMATION ANALYSES
WMReEpnovirrtoNnome.nFtaAlCTLaTboorxat1o0r8y Laboratory Requesturmoer(SRNH2779
Proprietary and Cantera
001253
Argus a1s014
I" ps
enone
a AT8n018, Onl
Gorn)
Cos
sig
Sly
oFPFS is. --
+
rE Earato taatn a
ppbo raoser
-- J
----
TweenDong Cotrmatn
rrrm
OnEEoTrIA :
TorPasr =
fh
a
emir eer|TmA Sa E | sw
-
rm aann
r or snE
cto n
J--
|8 JweaE.
oATh ms
R_t
CPoArtSuNoraarcoaenrs2s7ut5e9r3a5t3s
Artacmente
DATA SUMMARY TABLES
LaboratoryReWquMReeEstpnNourmfbooerFnA(CRaTNYTUbo2r7s17098
Prpdotany and Content
001255
fPurs eee
or[ S-- m
Table 1, Concentrations of FOS I at Serum Samples from Study FACT Tox-108
LL: Less than PEee Non theLowerLimiofQuanttation (0.05g/mL) prpeen --
)
os 1 ww
er 1 ww
es
@|
[eow n o 1 oom m ||
[ww | comm]
:
[ [f me |e s wocoooor irs eon||
ew iw]
ee
2m
rem
001256
Ccottmrmem
r T SoE m Y
Table 1. ee Concentrationsof 0SPFOS ftSorSaeme in Rat Serum Samples from Study FACT Tox-108 (continued)
Tee
mwse
= wi
we
wm |
-- ms-- T --w -- I------ w ws we me || I ee-- --T ws-- | [ eeewee wsi | [mewrr|
Pp Csi
001257
DPpA
Tm R Si e: o n
Table 1.e Concene otf PPrEFOaSSiitnRifator SSaonrrasSSamapmrpomSltuedyFAGTTox108 (continued) =--
-- ---- ---- ---- --
eer s
w=ee ||
we[we]
ewne
ws ||
eews
wese ||
Cr we
Procetay and Canfcensl
001258
fPutiamcearersuyras
Cnty ROePS -- coneLT
Table 2 RSeopCeGatoAenarlymsais oUf RatmSeruCmuSramplesEf0ro0m )Study FACT Tox-108
Jes
PeSEnT t nr llyoull oill ynolleos SSesos lolaT
[mI e I
2 [oan28bE asss eE E 3C | E wr E E E5S = wr]
S[ esora oe mer TToSiwnnRDrSurarTamsexctesasessa]rmor a|ne =J me| 5Tw 1]
SeorReo po nGone: P 1)Fun r RIo E wi aS rn a Tre
Table 3S.aPmhaprlmeacsofkrionmeStitcudSyubFgArCoTupT--oCxo1nc0e8ntrations of PFOS in Dam and Liter Serum <1 Lo rar Lover LtSari 05m
DF osace S Pros TLC PS SProy s
(20)
(EL)
1i 1 1w8e91n0 | oom <LLQ[0.0316}<(0.05) || wwe 18910P | om <LLQ0.0382]<(0.05)
I
18913 | <LLQ[0.0341]<(0.05)
18913P
<LLQ[0.0398}<(0.05)
[I Tes 18915 s|
Ter |
u<<LLiLoQc[l0po.3o022a231o<]<s((0o00.0055s))|)|
7
78938 | <LLQ[0.0311<(0.05)
T7 r|_e_i8ssa0 <LLQ(0.03530<(0.05)
T ort
38
18915P | <LLQ[0.0242]<(0.05)
Ti6ee2e6p || <ALLLO0[0002o29s)<0(00.0)5)
78935P | <LLQ(0.0308]<(0.05)
8E 840P E<LL] Q[0.0231]<(0.05) Tw] A
NA-Sampe not assayed. Insuficen sample vue or anayss.
Pree srsConte
001259
PeCrRtSusMoaorcoanne2s7t5o5n3s5i3e
Lorton RSeMcuERsenspvorootnmmoeoFrrtA(aCATLNTYaoGr3b7o7s3s
Table 4<. P4F:OLSesCsoncaennthrLaotvieornLstinoDfuanmitanadtnCr(0o0ss8-Fmo)stered Litter Seru--m SSamaplreosrmbeyleDeosage Group
E fy Tprc
free
py
oe
Adwmen
|
oomTeermTs em TAPea ee eeTTR --
[eew e
5 -- [-- A---- ewe---- rs-- wopoues[Ae
Cem ewT Taw n Ta aT Teeee
w mys]
oem ems
Se T Ta a weesee
o ow we er7gomwoeoos
owen
sw
[AA[Twe erwe a ee
----m--r------ mr
e 1 Uniresed Dmamse e 5 Untreated Lie ters
[ [wewes TTt<ioione opooovmemicsoooooosss[ T [s 8 s| e | s e T esr | |uoroopoosmnooooss |||
[ew 1 uooosomo0 [se1 ss | uYrCo1o-os2ioos |
[O re S m
o1e7 monH| N 1 | ew 0|
[owe ws w T<iioopooovweooooss1 [8 8 | m1 e TTm--m||
u TreatedDamse. ee --iiooosscoos1sC Treated Litemrs ee ------------|
Co o er ese Tem e sTc CT TFeew ee T | s --
omeereT Twi TTc cT Tr e we o ws
owe ese
m me e Tc c wweereT= =] ]
o oww s ee r Twp Tcc 1 mwwee mmss]
ows e wenTy c [c eer e ws ||
e 1 Trea Dae ms n e secET Teee eee =n] e]
Foews es T Tie T e o[oweeeo dicoo-se--ncaos |
ome es Ts me 10Teeme eT = =]
Fe o ow w s ee sT T Te m: o TT & o o 0T T 1eww e w[ T = = wr||
wwe e
msei T To o | mmoee
m--s |
ow T e ees Tse 0TTeemeeo Tr= ]
C oesow TT o 01 [r eweww |a wweweroms |
Prsnetar nd Corda
001260
Pe(rCtAuSoNruomcoaonre2s7u5t8o3n9a3te
shortyReqauMeREsenptvoNirrutomnNbom,eenrFt(AaLlCRTLNaTbMooUrZxaTt1o70rS8y
ATTACHMENT F ANALYTICAL REPORTS FROM CONTRIBUTING LABORATORIES
Proprietaryand Cantdental
001261
ADVANCED
.
BIOANALYTICAL
SERVICES, INC.
"
BIOANALYTICAL REPORT
Tite:
Quantitative DeterminationofPerfluorooctanesulfonate
(PFOS) in Rat Serum from Study #FACT-TOX-108 Using Turbo lon Spray LC/MS
.
Date:
Authors:
3
3
27 August 1999
David J. Anderson, M.S.
Amie J. Prince, B.S.
Holly D. Ross, M.S.
J
Prepared For:
3M Environmental Technology
and Safety Services
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
ABS Report No.:
99ADJA01 MLDOC
Study Protocol:
FACT-TOX-108
:
Number of Pages:
16
.
Summary and Conclusions
`The concentrationof perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) was determined in rat serum samples collected during the study #FACT-TOX-108 using a sensitive, specific, accurate, and reproducible analytical method developed by Advanced BioAnalytical Services, Inc.,
Ithaca, NY.
RisaotlasteerPuFmOsSamapnldesth(e5i0nutLe)mawlesrteanedxatrrda,ct1eHd,b1yH,a2lHi,q2uHi-dp-leirqfuliudoerxotorcatctainoenspurlofconeidcuraecitdo (anenTgaealttyrizave-edH-iboPynFOtmSuo)rdb.eo.Fioolnlsopwrianygleivqauipdorcahtrioomnaatnodgrraepcohnys/tmiatustsiosnp,esctarmopmleetreyxt(raLcCt/sMwSe)rein the
All samples were successfully analyzed within four runs. The lower limit of quantitation
was 0.05 ug/mL for PFOS. The precision of this assay (RSD) as determined from the
analysis ofquality control samples for PFOS was 4.01%. The precisionofthis assay
(RSD), as determined from the calibration standards for PFOS was <5.83%. The relative
error (RE)ofthe assay, as determined from the analysis of the quality control samples.
.
ranged from -7.32 to
calibration standards
10.1%.
ranged
The
from
REofthe assay,
-5.86 to 11.0%.
as
determined
from
the
analysis
of
001262
15 Catherwood Road = Ithaca, New York 14850 (607) 266-0665 m Fax (607) 266-0749
ADVANCED BIOANALYTICAL SERVICES
Title:
ABS Report No:
SIGNATURE PAGE
RQuaatntSietrautimvefrDoemteSrtmuidnyat#iFoAnoCfT-PTeOrfXl-u1or0o8ocUtsaniensgulTfuornbaoteo(nPFSOpSr)ayin
LCMS
99 MipOc
Reported by:
DReasveiadrJc.hASncdieerntsiosnt, M.S.
Z3Aust 1994
Date
Reviewedby: = hd { )
K
ithleen Cormack, B.S. Associate Auditor
Authorized for
Releaseby:
7
John B. Perkins, Ph.D. Assistant Scientific Director
zfua
Date
27A%.99
Date
IMASDVoAlNaCEDrca SERVICES, INC.
Page 20116
001263 99ADIAOLMLDOC
QAU STATEMENT Periodic inspectionsofthe bioanalytical portionofstudy #FACT-TOX-108 were conducted by the Quality Assurance Unit ofAdvanced BioAnalytical Services (ABS) for compliance with EPA GLP regulations (40 CFR Part 792). `The study was inspected on the following dates: 22 June 1999; 1, 2, 7, July 1999; 12 August 1999.
oRne:sults ofthe inspection were reported to ABS Management and Project Team Leader
22 June 1999; 1, 2,7, July 1999; 12 August 1999.
Resultsofthe inspections were reported to the Study Director on 12 August 1999. Based on the inspections and the data reviewed, this report is acomplete and accurate
representationofthe data.
a Assocl iateHArudi4 tor BS. Date 9
| A[ovEancReDY
SERVICES. INC.
Page3ofis
001264
SADIAOLMLDOC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNATURE PAGE wm
d
TABLE OF CONTENTS mms LI OFTS ABLET S... 1. INTRODUCTION wc
1.1. Study DeSCriptionandObJECHVE curs 2. METHODS coors
2.1. ADBIYHCE] PIOCAUTE(S)crvrvvsrsnsstssrson
2.3. D8 PROCESSING]
3.1. ASS2Y PETROIIANCE 1...
]
3.2. Analytical Results for Study #FACT-TOX-108 rrr
4. SUM ANDMCONA CLUR SIONY S corres
5. DATARETRIEVAL cosines
sos
6 REFERENCES worms sms
Lc...1] ASDAVANNACETDICAL
SERVICES. INC.
Pagedof16
001265
99ADIADLMLDOC
LIST OF TABLES
.
Table 1: Summaryof Sample and Assay Information for Protocol FACT-TOX-108.....9
Table 2:
Inter-Assay Precision and Accuracy Serum for Study #FACT-TOX-108
for PFOS Quality Control cvs
Samples
in
Rat 10
Table 3: Inter-Assay Precision and Accuracy for PFOS Calibration StandardsinRat Serum for Study AFACT-TOX-108 vrs 11
`Table 4:
Calibration Curve Statistics for the DeterminationofPFOS SUdY FFACT-TOX-108 ose
in
Rat
Serum
for
12
Table 5: Concentrationsof PFOS in Rat Serum Samples from Study #FACT-TOX-108
Table 6: Repeat Analysis of Rat Serum Samples from Study #FACT-TOX-108 ....... 16
MN ASOAVAANSCERDea
SERVICES. INC.
Page sof 16
001266
99ADIAOLMIDOC
1. INTRODUCTION
11. Study Description and Objective
.
p`Tehrefloubcjreocotitvaenoefstuhlifsonsattuedy(PwFaOsS)toidnertaetrsmeirnuemthseamcopnlceesntcroaltlieoctnesdodfuring the study #FACT-
TweOrXe-1a0na8l,yz"eOdrauls(inGgavaaglieq)uiCdr-olsisqu-iFdosetxetrraicntgiSontuadnydofturPbFoOSioninspRraatys.l"iqRuaitd serum samples
chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) assay.
2. METHODS 21. Analytical Procedure(s)
PmeFtOhSodco(n1c).entSreartuiomnssawmeprleesde(t5e0rumLi)newdeirneraetxtsrearctuemd abcycaordliiqnugidt-oltihqueivdaelxitdraatcetdioLnC/MS p1rHo,c1eHd,u2rHe,2uHs-ipnegreftlhuyolraocoecttataene10suilsofloantiecPaFciOdS(Taentdrath-eH-inPtFeOrSna)lfsrtoamndraartds(e1rSu)m,. Following erveavpeorrsaetdi-opnhatsoedcrhyrnoemsastaongdraspuhbyseoqnuean2t.1recxon5s0timtumtio(n5,usma)mpBleetaesxtirlaTMctCs,wecroelusmepnarated by ((1K0e:y9s0tomneethSacnieonlt:i2fimc,MInca.,mmBeolnleifuonmtea,cePtaAt)e)wiatnhda4n3i%niEtilaulemnotbBil(e9p0h:a10semoefth5a5no%l:E2lumenMt A c`harmommoantiougmraapchetya/tme)a.ssPFspOeSctcroonmceetnrtyra(tLiCon/sMSwe)riendseetleecrtmeidneidonbmyotnuirtbooriinogn s(pSrIaMy)lmioqudied. The negative ions monitored were:
m/z = 499.0 for PFOS [M-K]' m/=z 427.0 for Tetra-H-PFOS [M-H]'
rSetgurdeysssiaomnoplfepecoankceanrteraatriaotinoss w(epreeakdearteearomfinPeFdOfSr/opmeaa kweairgehatoefdT(e1t/yr?a)-, Hq-uPadFrOaSt)icversus ncaolmiibnraatliocnonscteanntdraartdisonwoefrete0n.0c5a,li0b.1r,at0i.o2n5,st0a.n5d,ar1d,s2., 4T,h8e, n1o6,miannadl2c0onpcgen/tmrLatPiFonOsSo.fthe
`PTFhOeSl.owQeuralliimtiytcoofntqruoalnt(itQaCt)iosne(rLuLmQs)amfoprlethsisatatshsraeyewdaifsfedreetnetrcmoinnceednttroatbieo0n.s0(50.g2/,m6L, .and s1a8mppgle/smL(QPCF4O,S1)0w0eurge/amnLa)lywzeerdewpirtehpaeraecdhaatsesaaychbadtilcuhtiinonretphlaitcwataess uosfefdoudr.uriDnigluation QC particular assay and were analyzed with each assay batch in replicates offouras needed.
cTohneceanctcreapttiaonncsoe fcraitterlieaasftotrhcraelei-bfroautritohnsosftatnhdearidnsdisvtiidpuualaltceadltihbartattihoenbsatcakn-dcaarldcurleapltiecdates
must not deviate more than Atleast one duplicate at the
15% LLQ
from must
their nominal concentration (except at exhibit a deviation within 20%ofthe
the LLQ). nomin42g.f67y7
MW ASDVA2NCED5 SERVICES. INC.
Pagesorls
$9ADIAOLMLDOC
ccrointceerniatrfaotliloonw.edTahree cioneaffciccoirednatoncfedweittehrmAiBnaStiSotnan(d')armduOsptebreat2i0n.g98P.rocTehdeuraecsc.eptance
.
o`fTtheheacicnedpitvaindcuaelcrQitCersiaamfporlethreepqluiaclaitteyscmountsrtolnostadmepvlieastestmiopruleattehdanth1at5at%lefarstomtwtoh-etihrirds
nominal concentrations. deviation within 15%.
At least one replicate at each QC concentration must exhibiat
A summaryof Table 1.
the
sample
and
assay
information
for
study
#FACT-TOX-108
is
given
in
22. AssaySite All samples were analyzed at Advanced BioAnalytical Services, Inc., Ithaca, NY.
23. Data Processing
tThheendeagtaatiwveerieocnomlloedcet.edPuesaikngarteuarsbowieornesipnrtaeygrLatCe/dMbSy tsehleePctEedSiCoInEmXonpirtoogrrianmg M(SaIcMQ)uainn,
rveesruslitosnta1b.4l,esrefsriodminMgaocnQauMaanciwnetroesshacvoemdpaustetre.xt FfiollelsoawnidnguppleoaakdeadretaoitnhteegArBatSionf,iltehseerver
Wwhaetrseona (wvei5g.3h.t1e.d01(1P/Sy'S),qIunacd.r,aWtaicynreeg,rePsAsio1n90w8a7s).pCearlfcourlmaetdiounssiwnegrtehepesrofftowramreed poanckage
unrounded numbers. All calibration standard three significant figures before reporting.
and
QC
results
were
rounded
to
no
less
than
3. RESULTS
31. Assay Performance
`The performanceofthe assay for `control samples is documented in
PFOS Table
as 2.
determined from the analysisofdaily quality The inter-assay precision (RSD)ofquality
icnontthreolressaulmtpslefsrormantgheesdefqruoamlit1y.5c7onttor4o.l 0s1a%mpfloers;POthSe.relTahtievreeewrraosr n(oREm)arrkanegdedinfarccoumracy
13210 10.1%.
pTrheecipseirofno(rRmSanDc)eoofftdhaeilsytacnadlairbdrsatriaonngceudrvfersomis
1d.o1c1utmoe5n.t8e3d%infoTrabPlFeOS3..
The inter-assay There was no
marked inaccuracy in the between -5.86 to 11.0%.
results
from
these
standards;
the
relative
error
(RE)
ranged
001268
--_----ee
IM ASDVOANCNEDcSa
Page Tot 16
99ADIA0LMLDOC
SERVICES. INC.
pTrheesesaltoepde,iny-Tiantbelrece4p.t,Tahnedr*coveaflfuiecsiernatongfeddetferrommin0a.t9i9o5n4 (to)0f.o9r9e8a2cfhoranPalFyOtiScailn rruatnsaerreum, sAlulccAesBsSfulpleyrseoxntrnaecltaqsusailginteydcotontarnoall(yQzCe)sasmapmlpelsesfoarntdhicsalpirborjaetcitownesrteanrdeaqrudisr.edRetsoults of ctrhieteerxitarafcotritohniswaesrseayr.eviReewsueldtbs yarae tmraaiinnetdaianneadlyisnt tahgeaisntsutdythreepcroer-ddseoffinAeBdSa.cceptance
32. Analytical Results for Study #FACT-TOX-108
APlFlOdSatcaownceernetrraotuinodnesdintorantosleerssumthfarnotmhSreteudsyig#niFfAicCaTnt-TfiOgXur-e1s0b8efaorreeprreepsoernttiendg iinn TTaabbllee 5S..
Study Table
samples 6
requiring
repeat
analysis
for
Study
#FACT-TOX-108
are
presented
in
4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
`The concentrationofPFOS study #FACT-TOX-108.
was
determined
in
rat
serum
samples
collected
during
the
PFOS was Les.
isolated
from
serum
bya
liquid-liquid
extraction
procedure
and
determined
by
`PTFhOeSq.ualTihtyeopfrtehciesidoentoerfmtihneataisosnasy,waassdseatteisrfmaicnteodryftrhormoutghheoaunta.lyTshiseoLfLqQualwiatsy c0o.n0t5roplg/mL samples was 4.01% for PFOS.
5. DATA RETRIEVAL #TFheACcTal-cTulOaXt-ed10co8ncaernetmraatiinotnaidnaetda ofnrofmilethienatnhaelyasricshoifvresaotftsehreuAmdsvaamnpcleeds fBoiroASntauldyytical Services, Inc., Ithaca, NY in ABS Notebook 2319.
6. REFERENCES
1. MAdevtahnocdeVdalBiidoaAtniaolnytfiocratlheSeQruvaincteistaVtailoindoaftPieornflRueoproorotc9ta9nVeDsJulAfOoLna.tMeL(DPOFCO.S) in
Rat Serum by Turbo lon B.S., and Holly D. Ross,
SMp.rSa.y2L6CA/uMgSu.stDa1v9i9d9.J.
Anderson,
M.S.
AmiJe.
Prince,
_--
IM ASCOVAARNSCEFDar
SERVICES. INC.
Pagesoris
00129
S9ADIAOLMLDOC
7. TABLES
Tablel: S10u8mmaryofSample and Assay Information for Protocol FACT-TOX-
Species/Matrix:
RavSerum
Sample Collection and Storage Information:
Anticoagulant/Stabilizer: Reported Sample Collection Dates: Dates Received at ABS: Storage TemperaattAuBrSe:
None 7 January 1999 to 29 January 1999 16 June 1999 20C
Assay Information: Assay Period:
22 June 1999 to 28 June 1999
Analyte:
Potassium p(ePrFfOlSu)orooctanesulfonate
Analytical Standard: Lot No:
PFOS 171
Source:
Mm
Internal Standard: Lot No: Source:
1H,1H2H2Hperflucrooctane sulfonic acid (Tetra-H-PFOS) 59909 M
Calibration Range: Regression Method: Weighting Factor: Lower LimitofQuantitation: Upper Limit of Quantitation:
quadratic uy 0.05 pg/mL 20 pg/mL
001270
---- ee-- e --------------------------
IMASOvSAANCAEFDear
Paseois
$9ADIAI MLDOC
SERVICES. INC.
Table2: SIanmtpelr-eAsssianyRPartecSiesriounmafnodr SAtcucduyra#cFyAfCoTr-PTFOOXS-1Qu0a8lity Control
. :
PFOS Concentration (ug/ml
.
RunNo. | QCI cz QC3
Qc4
=]
02
6
18
100
100
Lin 10 Dilution) (1 in 20 Dilution)
T
0.187 615 73
10
NA
0192 0.191
622 622
173 175
109 110
NA NA
:
2
0.182 6.14 173 0.191 613 169
108 NA
NA NA
0.191 591 16.8
NA
0.190 620 165
NA
NA NA
0.192 619 167
NA
NA
3
0.172 6.02 17.0
114
107
0174 622 16.7
nt
0175 5.94 17.0
110
106 100
0177 6.08 17.1
109
103
5 0.184 637 173
109
0.187 636 175
13
NA NA
0.197 639 175
1
NA
0.183 633 17.1
109
NA
Mean 0.185 6.18 17.1
110
104
RSD(%)| 401 233 192
157
292
RE
132 3.04 5.00
10.1
3.97
RSD = (SD/Mean) x 100%
RE = [(Mean-Nominal)Nominal] x 100%
NA: Not Applicable.
am ASDOVAANNACLYETDCAL
SERVICES. INC.
Page 100f 16
001271
99ADIAOLMLDOC
=
FACT-TOX-108
BF CBErS enee er 2 [+
i
mle ee
3 oo | oe] 0237
PROS Concentration (g/mL)
EH i 2
0944
452 |] 156 201
00553| 00982
0507
aa | am | ise | a0
:g
Tabled:
Calibration Curve Statistics for the Determination of PFOS in Rat Serum for Study #FACT-TOX-108
RunNo.|_ Quadratic Linear
Coefficient (A)|Coefficient (B)
T 0.000727
0.1225
2 -0.0005896 0.1392
3 -0.0006758 0.1401
5 -0.0004928 0.1345
Mean | -0.0006215 |0.1341|
y=AX +Bx+C, weighted 1/y*
Tntercept
0.001121 0.000944 0.001454 0.001190
0.001178
Coefficient of Determination (r)
0.9959 0.9982 0.9959 0.9954
0.9964
IM ASDoVAANCEPDea
SERVICES. INC.
Page 120116
001273
99ADIADI MIDOC
TableS:
Concentrations TOX-108
of
PFOS
in
Rat
Serum
Samples
from
Study
#FACT-
Rar PFOS Concentration
Number
(ug/ml)
18901
0.0507
18901P <LLQ[0.0323]<(0.05)
18903
480
189037
357
18904 <LLQ[0.0462]<(0.05)
18906 <LLQ[0.0329]<(0.05)
18907
135
18907P
335
.
18908
241
18909
1.06
18910 <LLQ[0.0316]<(0.05)
18910P <LLQ0.0382]<(0.05)
18911
0.0798
18911P
0.123
18912 <LLQ[0.0376]<(0.05)
18913 <LLQ[0.0341]<(0.05)
189137 <LLQ[0.0398]<(0.05)
18915 <LLQ[0.0221]<(0.05)
18915P <LLQ[0.0242]<(0.05)
18917 <LLQ[0.0355]<(0.05)
18917P <LLQ[0.0221]<(0.05)
18918 <LLQ[0.0323]<(0.05)
18918P <LLQ[0.0247)<(0.05)
18919 <LLQ[0.0340]<(0.05)
18920
1.96
18922 <LLQ0.0412]<(0.05)
18922P <LLQ[0.0367]<(0.05)
18923 <LLQ[0.0291]<(0.05)
18923P <LLQ0.0331]<(0.05)
18924
272
18924p
307
18926 <LLQ[0.0323]<(0.05)
18926P <LLQ[0.0229]<(0.05)
18927 <LLQ0.0305]<(0.05)
18927P <LLQI0.0318)<(0.05)
18929
2.40
*Rat Number with a "P" indicates a
pup sample.
<LLQ: Less than the Lower Limit of
Quantitation (0.05 pg/mL)
mamm 2 SICANs ALYTAL
SERVICES. INC.
Page 13016
001274 59ADIADI MIDOC
Table5:
(Continued) Concentrations of PFOS in Rat Serum Samples from Study #FACT-TOX-108
Rat PFOS Concentration
Number*
(ug/ml)
18931 <LLQ[0.0382)<(0.05)
18931P <LLQ[0.0196]<(0.05)
18932 <LLQ[0.0399]<(0.05)
18934
125
18934P
34.1
18935 <LLQ[0.0316}<(0.05)
18935P <LLQ[0.0206}<(0.05)
18936 <LLQ[0.0302)<(0.05)
18936P <LLQ[0.0230]<(0.05)
18937
1.80
18938 <LLQ[0.0359)<(0.05)
18939 <LLQ[0.0311]<(0.05)
18939P <LLQ[0.0308]<(0.05)
18940 <LLQ[0.0330]<(0.05)
18940P <LLQ[0.0231]<(0.05)
18941
534
18942
112
18943
65.1
18943P
822
18946
157
18947
86.9
18948
96.1
18950
66.4
18951
724
189517
592
18952
9038
18952P
483
18953
670
18953P
538
18956
975
18956P
893
18957
69.1
18957P
932
18958
683
18958P
562
*Rat Number with a "P" indicates a
p<uLpLQs:ampLlees.s than the Lower Limit of
Quantitation (0.05 wg/mL)
.
001275
Lh.J] ASoAvNanAceToICAL
SERVICES. INC
Page 140f16
S9ADIADIMIDOC
TableS:
(Continued) Concentrations of PFOS in Rat Serum Samples from Study #FACT-TOX-108
Rat PFOS Concentration
Number*
(ug/ml)
18959
592
18960
780
18960P
93.6
18961
69.1
18961P
476
18963
836
18964
856
18964P
929
18965
759
18967
742
18968
809
18969
786
18970
993
18970
969
18971
218
18972
669
189720
582
18973
819
189730
795
18974
172
18976
79
18977
124
*Rat Number with a "P" indicates a
pup sample.
mn ABIoOvAaNnAcLEYTDICAL SERVICES. INC.
Page 15016
001276
S9ADIADLMIDOC
B 8o8o8p ||
-- Table:
Repeat Analysis of Rat Serum
Tm Te On
Samplesfrom Study #FACT-TOX-108
Om Ren ey
Remy
Rone
Rewr
8385E2| amber
wCom Niamvbeer Ro"omry Cuommle NCuommeb uCommle Recpoanneed
S820F305|| o wWwooarrr w 000 bbu mwi oouuo waossewseiu maaye 3 m 33 m 111 3m7m 7s 555m1ma s y 1
wWw e 10 DDwwuioUvQlaemmesminaym 3121 aus 35 om >i
RSUt:NaGmresrirltemUppercLopspfsGuoamiei.tion.
3R1)RRaEanm cAcoFocSnOecRmeORnrmEtiAoNoSnnSAacSYe:adedd ccalrbvoatnon ganee..
2R15.RRiunEn ccoAnoFeOmnRmSRtcEiPonOOnRwlTiiENinDCccOSlaNbbCert:ioon ganege..
2323
russe
morse
ADVANCED BIOANALYTICAL SERVICES. INC.
ADDENDUM TO THE BIOANALYTICAL REPORT
Title:
Addendum - Quantitative Determination of
Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in Rat Serum from
Study #FACT-TOX-108 Using Turbo lon Spray LC/MS
Date:
13 October 1999
Addendum Report: 99ADJA0LMLADD.DOC
OriginalReport: 99ADJA01.MLDOC
Authors:
David J. Anderson, M.S. Amie J. Prince, B.S. Holly D. Ross, M.S.
Prepared For:
3M Environmental Technology and Safety Services St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
Number of
Pages:
3
001278
15 Catherwood Road ithaca. New York 14850 u (607) 266-0665 Fax (607) 266-0749
ADVANCED BIOANALYTICAL SERVICES
Title:
SIGNATURE PAGE
Addendum - Quantitative Determination of
Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in Rat Serum from Study #FACT-TOX-108 Using Turbo lon Spray LC/MS
ABS Report No.
Reported by:
99ADJARI.ML4 .DOC
DaviJd. Anddgson, M. Research Scientist
13 ocr 29
Date
Reviewedby: Hh a rae k
athleen Cormack, B.S.. Associate Auditor
Authorized for
Release by:
John R/Perkins, Ph.D. Assistant Scientific Director
Accepted by:.
YLL. HL
Kris Hanson, Ph.D. 3M Study Director
360499
Date
13.00.94
Date
H ot 97
Date
mam `SSAeoDAAVvNiAAcNLeCYsET.DICIANGL Pagers
001279
9ADIAGIMIADDOOC
ADDENDUM SUMMARY ADDENDUM `thAidsdiatdidonenofduSmtuidnydiDciarteecstaocrcseipgtnaantcueroefotnhetheorSiigginnaalturreepoPratge. The signature page of
REASON FOR ADDENDUM Original GLP report requires the signatureof the Study Director.
NIU AcDoVAlNeCEcD., pases
SERVICES. INC.
001280
momo LADDOOC
PS etmcca arons tonta
ATTACHMENT G
REPORT SIGNATURE PAGE
Litrato RWeMESanevhveoaomnomeFAAnCabETooseSrsy
Affe
rl=Dp aFtee os-2000
PHaeinsT.aCaser, DaVMn, PhD. Sponsor Represenap me bep Te n
LD7 / 5
Tale Bacon, Laboratory Manager
2Jew/o
Tate
[------
001251
Study Title Analytical Laboratory Report on the Determination of the Presence and Concentration of
PerfluoErxopooctsaendestuolPfootnaatsesi(uPmFOPeSr)fliunotrhoeocStearneusmoulffoSnpatreagvuiae-GDaavwalgeey Rats REPORT AMENDMENT NO. 1
Amendment Date: 19 April 2000
Performing Laboratory 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
3M Environmental Laboratory 935 Bush Avenue St. Paul, MN 55106
Laboratory Project Identification ET&SS LRN-U2779 ET&SS FACT Tox-108
3M Environmental Laboratory
001282
ReportAmeFnAdCmeTnTtoxN-o1.081
This amendment modifies the following portion(s) of the final report:
1. FiNAL REPORT: Make the following addition to the final report text. App: Avafltueersthsetaftiendalforreptohretawnaalsytiiscsauledre(fseirgennecde amantderairaclhiavnedd),tesittwsausbsdtiasnccoevweererdetihnaatcctuhreatpeu.riTthyese vtoaldueetsewrmeirneebtahseeadcotunallypounriNtyMofRthaenasleyssessu.bsStuabnsceeqsu(ePntFOcSheLmoitca1l7c1haarnadct2e1r7i)z.aTtihoen ifsinoaclcruerproirntg wainlallybseisawmhenednetdhetyo daerteaiilsstuheedafnoarlyPtFicOaSl rLeostult1s71usainndg t21h7e.purity values from the certificates of REASON: `iTsoisdseusecdrifboertPhFeOcShaLnogtes1t7h1atanwidll21b7e. made to the final report when the certificateofanalysis
2. FiNAL REPORT:
Make the following AMEND 70 READ:
addition
to
the
exceptions
lst
in
the
Statementof
Compliance
section.
*
The purity unknown
and and
wstaasbinloittyodefttehremitensetdspurbisotratnocethaenidniatniaaltyitoinocafltrheifsersteundcye.
material
are
REASON:
`The Statementof Compliance section was incomplete.
3. FINAL REPORT:
`The purityofthe test 99.49% (Lot 171) as
substance is 99.28% listed in Table 2.
(Lot
217),
and
analytical
reference
material
is
AMEND TO READ:
`The purityofthe unknown.
test
substance
and
analytical
reference
material
listed
in
Table
2
is
REASON:
The purity values 2 are incorrect.
stated
for
the
test
substance
and
analytical
reference
material
listedin
Table
3M Environmental Laboratory
001283
Amendment Approval Roport AmeFnAdCmoTnTeonxi1o08|
MoenTG
Marvin T. Case, D.V.M., Ph.D., Sponsor Representative
phe ee Date
Hefou
Kristen J. Hansen, Ph.D., Study Director
6/19/60
Date
aM Environmental Laboratory
0012843