Document jmzm23g9kdjKMn79rwYNV38E5

FORM 937 .X P m LAW DEPARTMENT TIDE WATER ASSOCIATED OIL COMPANY ASSOCIATED DIVISION 79 n ew Mont gomer y St r eet Sa n Fr a n c isc o . Ca l if or nia July 17 1S3S Dr. Robert i. K e h o e , University of Cincinnati College of liedi cine, Cincinnati, Ohio. $ Dear Dr. Kehoe: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of 9 inst. in which I note that you will be here about 25 inst. C would very much like to see you some time dur ing your stay here, and trust that you will be able to spend some tins -ith me. I nope, also, that your plans will be such that you will have the opportunity to have lunch or dinner with me and perhaps to give me a chance to show you something of our 'exposition. After I filed my Petition in the Telepnev case, the Commission "'iled a seventy-page Answer. The Answer was devoted primarily to establishing that Telepnev had lead poisoning, b u t contained nothing to show any causal connection between his dis ability and his employment. It failed to meet my challenge to show even a single*sentence of testimony to support such conten tion. "" I filed a Reply to this Answer and called the C o u r t 's attention to the fact, that this lengthy Answer of the Commission had failed to point out in any respect that there was a causal connection between the disability and the employment. I am sorry to say, however, that despite this fact, the Supreme Court has issued its Order denying the Petition for Rehearing, which means that we do not even get a chance to argue the matter before the Supreme Court. There is practically nothing else we can do>, so I presume we will have to pay this Award. I am completely at a loss to understand the Court's r fusai to hear the Petition. ' ith kind regards, I am N24395 -