Document jm4KqYzOQgJq27K8GDdaRQ8m2
Facts and Figures
SUMMARY
This is our first semi-annual report since we moved into our new Tigard Research headquarters. Since this is the year end, we will in clude some annual figures in addition to the six months figures. The sales and profits generated from new products in 1967 reached all time highs of $3,307,524 and $875,769. This growth since 1962 is shown on the charts on pages 3 and 4. The 1967 figures represent 4.1% of the Gypsum Division sales and 4.6% of the Division profits. Firestop sales escalated to 30,604 M sq ft of 1/2" and 81,792 M sq ft of 5/8" which are increases of 26.1% and 19.0% respectively over 1966 figures. We feel that improvements in the products and new fire and sound ratings have been a factor in this growth. In addition, it is estimated that reduced weight limits for Firestop have saved approximately $62,303 in 1967.
$200,961 was budgeted for Research in 1967. Our R & D expenses were actually $174,232 for the year. We have budgeted $221,000 for Research in 1968. Our expected distribution of budgeted expenditures in 1968 are shown on the graph on page 8.
New Products
The only new product released in the last six months was a vermiculite aggregate texture which will be called Bestex D. The major research activity has been the continuation of projects which were started in 1967 or earlier. The molded grainboard pilot plant is com plete and some encouraging trial runs were made. Our option to develop this process has been extended for another six months. The wallboard radiant heating panel is now at the stage where we will be seeking Under writers approval and at the same time field testing will be started. Another new product is a specially formulated 3/16" thick wallboard which we are proposing to use as a core material in wood paneling. Earlier experiments were conducted at the Savannah plant but the cur rent investigation will be done in cooperation :with the Eugene Division.
Improved Products
Hard End wallboard may be one of the most significant improve ments in gypsum wallboard in recent years. Very shortly an instal lation will be made in the Acme wallboard line. From this method we can evaluate the method of manufacturing hard end wallboard and also see what the reaction in the field will be. The Denscal operation is currently underway and replacements of Denscal for Densite are being made to take advantage of the lower cost of Denscal. The estimated savings per ton of Densite replaced by Denscal is $11.00. Other pro duct improvements being investigated are the replacement of limestone with gypsum in Joint System, the search for a lower cost emulsion for water proof sheathing and the development of a hard edge wallboard.
1
II
12 MONTHS 1967 MARKET PERFORMANCE OF NEW PRODUCTS
Product
Sales Volume
Dens-Cote Base (all)
18,106.6
Tile Backer Board (all)
4,824.7
Gypsum Sound Deadening Board
764.0
One Day Joint Compound
292.9
Ready Mix
6,782.0
Triple Duty
4,885 .0
Grabit Adhesive
74.4
Bestex A Texture
1,043.3
Bestex B Texture
41.0
Bestex C Texture
222.7
Bestex D Texture
1.0
Dens-Cote Plaster (all)
3,043.9
Dens-Cote Tape
1.2
Model Densite
.1
Ram Process Plaster
37.3
Dnescal PR Denscal HP Tooling Plaster High Expansion Plaster
.5
0. 0. 0.
List Sales $801,372.60
409,567.83 30,168.65 50,168.98
837,517.99 735,909.21
11,073.37 170,678.85
8,115.44 42,805.84
165.00 185,353.80
18,099.07 2.20
6,050.22 35.20
0. 0. 0.
Gross Operating P $272,235.77 197,884.02 9,617.16 11,210.74 127,674.46 172,559.93 4,207.96 28,072.27 72.46 (2,083.65) 9.35 45,584.34 5,332.58 .33 3,380.30 11.40
0. 0. 0.
TOTALS
$3,307,524.00
$875,769.00
6
6 MONTHS 1967 MARKET PERFORMANCE OF NEW PRODUCTS
Product Dens-Cote Base (all) Tile Backer Board (all) Gypsum Sound Deadening Board One Day Joint Compound Ready Mix Triple Duty Grabit Adhesive Bestex A Texture Bestex B Texture Bestex C Testure Bestex D Texture Dens-Cote Plaster (all) Dens-Cote Tape Model Densite Ram Process Plaster Denscal PR Denscal HP Tooling Plaster High Expansion Plaster
Sales Volume 10,452.3 2,694.7 438.6 180.1 3,632.4 2,692.7 45.1 616.2 24.8 121.2 1.0 1,370.31.1 .1 58.3 .5
0. 0. 0.
List Sales $468,296.17
232,895.11 15,317.34 25,468.63
427,326.03 388,806770
5,362.79 101,691.66
4,933.60 22,560.45
165.00 83,743.11 11,117.65
2.20 3,894.27
35.20
0. 0. 0.
Gross Operating Prof $169,231.36 113,571.94 4,872.29 5,590.25 63,066.03 84,917.45 1,915.58 18,215.63 63.52 1,241.59 9.35 21,304.96 3,716.43 .33 2,397.30 11.40
0. o. 0.
TOTALS
$1,791,526.00
$481,125.00
7
reduces end splitting of the paper and makes the *nd of the board harder and therefore less subject to damage in handling, it is our opinion that reducing beading at the end joints is attacking the problem where it is most prevalent. Furthermore, our method willnot involve new materials or extra operations as does the U.S'.G. method.
A spray system appears best for producing the hard end wallboard. The apparatus for applying the hard end treatment has been pur chased, test operated in Tigard and sent to Acme, where it will be installed in their wallboard line between the end sawing and end bundling operations. Mr. Hollingsworth suggested adding a green dye to the resin treatment for identification and to use as a pro motional aid. Tests are currently in progress to determine whether the green dye has any tendency to migrate through to the finished surface.
4. Lower Cost Sheathing - R&D 90
In view of the narrow profit in sheathing, an all out effort is being expended to reduce costs whenever possible. One approach was to make the edges square instead of tongue and groove. Sales, however, felt they could not sell a square edge sheathing because of the FHA requirement that the edges be tongue and groove. Re ducing the weight and quality of the apaper is another considera tion being acted on by manufacturing. Still another potential cost reduction is to try some wax-rosin emulsions to see if they will make the core water resistant less expensively than the as phalt wax emulsion we now use. Trials are being conducted at the Akron, N. Y. plant to determine whether there are any savings to be gained from the emulsion.
5. Reduce Limestone Costs in Joint System - R&D 275
Two different limestones are used in our Acme Joint System pro ducts. One of these (Purestone) is cheaper than the other by about $5 per ton. The more expensive limestone (Thompson Weiman marbledust) is used in the high volume products such as Topping and Triple Duty. A coarser version of Purestone was tried to make it more like the marble dust but there is still a difference in the working characteristics which we feel would adversely af fect the working properties of the products. Any gain in raw mat erial savings could easily be wiped out by a possible reduction in sales, so it is not worth the risk tomake the change.
Another possibility for cost reduction is the substitution of gypsum for limestone in Joint System. While this is a more difficult ob jective to achieve, the potential saving is much greater than a mere limestone substitution would offer. There are two reasons why gypsum is not used as a filler in Joint System. Gypsum counteracts the alkali in the casein products and keeps the casein from going into solution. The casein must go into solution in order to provide adhesion. This would not be a problem in Triple Duty or Ready Mix since these products contain vinyl adhesives. The other problem is the inherent absorbency of gypsum. This causes the joint system
13
to be more absorbent than the wallboard paper and results in dec oration problems. One approach is to use anhydrous gypsum. An other is to treat dihydrate gypsum with a waterproofing agent to give it the required properties. Both methods are presently under investigation.
14