Document jgaz5XwVEb92a0pEOb12RkE5k

I4> ,2 CHEMICALS AMD PLA8T3CS rc(M Mr. B. K. Barton Company 565 Riford Road location Neenah, Wise. 5^956 Copy fa See Attached Distribution P 0. BOX 579. NIAGARA FALLS, NM YORK 14302 oat, November 21, 1969 Originating Oepf. Research and Oeve/opmen/ Oepcrfmenf Angering faltor rfol* American Can Company Green Bay, Wisconsin The attached report summarizes the machine trial held at the American Can Company mill in Green Bay, Wisconsin on November 6, 1969 for the purpose of evaluating High Purity Asbestos as a soften ing agent in paper. Except for the contained analytical test data, the report is mainly of academic interest, as the success of the trial depends entirely on the results of the subjective handfeel test program which their marketing group will perform. If they decide that the benefits produced by our material are a salable asset, it will probably be necessary to run a second trial so that adequate towel samples can be obtained for field testing. GLD/bsn Attach. G. L. Dickson tCC - CA-iCFiA A '727C UCC 011056 TECHNICAL SERVICE REPORT THE EVALUATION OP HIGH PURITY ASBESTOS AS A ----------gOFMIMnflEHT IN 'PAPElTmfEEIffg---------- for American Can Company Green Bay, Wisconsin tfovember b, 19b9 by G. L. Dickson Group Manager - W L. Carrlck Project No. 452-M33 November 17, 1969 UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION Chemicals & Plastics Research and Development Department Niagara Falls, New York 14302 A 1727 UCC 011057 SUBJECT This report summarizes the High Purity Asbestos trial performed by American Can Company at their Green Bay, Wisconsin mill on November 6, 1969. The primary objective of this work was to acquire sufficient samples of toweling containing two levels of asbestos which would eventually be evaluated by American Can's marketing department. It is their intent to develop a product with improved handfeel softness properties, but which possesses strength characteris tics similar to their present production. Also of consideration at this time was the effect of asbestos addition on both their production and converting operations. TRIAL RESULTS Samples of converted toweling of adequate size containing two levels of asbestos addition were obtained from this trial. It has been reported that portions of these have been forwarded to American Can's marketing group for their review,which should be carried out in the near future. No operational problems were encountered during either the manufacture of these trial samples or their subsequent con version into household towel rolls. Although no formal evaluation was made at the time on the effect of asbestos addition on handfeel softness, it is felt that a significant increase resulted. As is usual, this was accompanied by a loss in strength which was minimized by the presence of IAD (carboxymethyl cellulose) and Kymene 557 in the furnish. TRIAL DISCUSSION This evaluation was carried out in four parts, only the last two directly involving the addition of asbestos to the papermaking fur nish. The following is a brief summary of the four trial periods, Part A Production was carried out under normal conditions but with 0.39? Kymene 557 being added to the furnish. (For strength improve ment ). Part B During this period, 2,02 lb. IAD (carboxymethyl cellulose)/ton of paper and 0.21% Kymene were added to the furnish. This reportedly was similar costwise to the total amount of Kymene added in Part A. How ever, based on the small amount of test data available (refer Table I), UCC 011058 A 17272 it appears that better physical test results were obtained under the latter conditions. Part C Approximately 2% High Purity Asbestos was introduced into the system at the machine stuff box (in slurry form), utilizing an asbestos pellet repulper (R-l). Because of the brief trial period involved, it must be assumed that equilibrium conditions were probably not attained. However, because of the proximity of the asbestos point of addition to the headbox, the major effects of the asbestos were realized in a relatively short time. Part D The final trial period was the same as Part C except the addi tion of asbestos was increased to about 4% based on their machine production. Additional data concerning various aspects of the trial are con tained in the attached Mill Trial Data Sheet. Table I contains a summary of the physical test results obtained by their paper inspectors during the four trial phases. Table II contains analytical data obtained by our Niagara Falls laboratory on reel specimens and samples of converted towels (after embossing, printing, and rewinding), CONCLUSIONS No problems were encountered during the trial and sufficient con verted towels were obtained for evaluation by their people. Initial results indicate that softness was benefited with a moderate loss In sheet strength. The lower tensile strength did not effect converting in any respect. Because of the short trial periods and the presence of talc in the pulp (contains magnesium which interferes with analyz ing for asbestos), it was not possible to calculate asbestos retention. This is an imoortant parameter however, and some effort should be made to determine this value at a later date. G. L. Dickson/bsn UCC 011059 A 17273 SUMMARY OP PAPER INSPECTION REPORT >o> oj 4c> XuowI o \o c>- in oLPi jo < 0) s cn TJ E0h> 4b)OjJ < 0) oo ef\J\i iiHn o o tn o ST rH vo in n CM H rl xxo>: U co 0) < oi c<u Eh(S o o C\J oo in in OJ i--I OO in in r--=r o * o * =*r in o h- DO OJ mm mm oo oo in 00 o in OJ OJ OJ rH in o o o OJ 00 CO r-- r-- XI ST *1 OOO OJ H 1 ST msr s\ cqI O OO CT\ O- rH oo m cn m o o* O 43 m .c H hfl \o <j\cn VO in m oo 01 H =r on in m cd <u rH rH rH rH rH rH rH m3 01 43 O 4h CO aou Eh E fl X H -H Cd VO CSS OJ OJ T3 rH O cd tH H U 0) Eh Oh * 01 o o a CO < 03 O Q 43 43 43 43 tH u U tH cd Oh cd 0h cd 0h cd CL, UCC 011060 A 1 7274 SAMPLE ANALYSES p S p gO MM ST OO o o o\ in to o O (M pm 0) P a < o p CO uo 3p TD CO 0) bOO E co < M in in m-=r o O CM vo* oo MO MO o o inm * r-l CM iron c*-c^ o o on in oo td o o- cm on n i-l O OD CO SI to rH o on r-- u H H JTVO 1M| r-l OOOO rH ft m o o oo a cd cd co co T3 i--i CD <l) P V PS 4J > C o o C 10 CM in t--VO < on cm iH co M OOrlW on co vo on vo mcovo ** OOrlOJ <ouo pu p pt* pu 0d) Ocdi Ocld, CaUs 0c-d> E; cd E< E< E< E&4 to a) o o o o rH JS- CU CM tI VO O H CM Eh <CQOQ pppp U uu cd cd cd <d Pm CU Oh Oh UCC 011061 A 1 727b UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION MINING * METALS DIVISION MILL TRIAL DATA SHEET November 6, 1969 COMPANY LOCATION and date of TRiAt American Can Co., Green Bay, Wise. company representatives and titifr Bruce Robertson, Earl Sandstrum,--------- Marvin Pobes ______ ill. ucc pfpbprfntativfs B. K. Barton and 0. L* Dickson IV. TRIAL OBJECTIVES (la of ..opoH----- - To prepare samples of toweling contain- lng two levels of High Purity Asbestos PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION 1 Type of Pr~4..^ White Dry Creped Toweling Grade Name______ &70__________________________________ Basts Weight I2**6 lb (2t* * 36-500) Daily Production___100~H0 tons .Coated WS/No I h /hour 8,800 Total Daily Production of Mill. (Tissue and Board) No. of Plys_____________ "________________ VI. MACHINE DESCRIPTION Type Of Mnrhinw Fourdrlnler (Yankee)_________ Machine No2(Cylinder) No. of Cylinders. Machine Speed .(Tissue) Reel SpeedI960 FPM ?.3(Tissue) % Crepe_____ ?Wire Mesh Wire WidthMachine Trim_____ 184 Inches Size Press. No .Calenders. NO A 1 7276 UCC 011062 VII. AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT Location Saveall (Type)Flow Rate-------------------------------------------------------------- VIII. STOCK PREPARATION - Continuous or Batch Type Beater and Capacity No. of Beater Chests and Capacity; Machine Chest Capacity Stock Freeness (Mach. Chest and Stuff Box) Headbox Consistency____ 0182 - 0.199? Makeup pHMachine pH ix. furnish makeup* Basis (Ib./ton, tr.) (Refer to trial log for addition levels. ) Fumhlt Constituent Kymene 557 % I AD (Carboxymethyl cellulose)______ High Purity Asbestos Founds _________________________ . * For board systems Include furnish for each medium - topllnsr, undorllnor, filler, and baddinsr. 2 A17277 UCC 011063 X. ASBESTOS ADDITION - Pellet Repulper [Type) ------------------------------------------------------- Asbestos aTM** Purlty Pellets____Lot No= Point of Stuff box (Immediately prior to fan pump) Pounds of Asbestos Addedper ton BDF------------------ per beater per hour Per cent asbestos addition on BDF____^^--------------------------------------------- XI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Quality Control Data Record Stock Prep. Log Sampling (in order of importance) Id) A MmHon Trial* Reel aorri Trial* Tray Water Title* and Twml Stuff box Stuff box Vat Reel Headbox Stuff box Headbox Tray Reel Saveall effluent Saveall effluent Saveall influent Saveall influent Identify samples by name, date, time Wet samples should approximate 50d ml. Weight of BD filter pad is required for all vat, tray, and saveall samples. UCC 011064 A 17278 XII. TRIAL LOG (Comments including changes in furnish and operating conditions) TIim C*mmnt Part A 0.39* Kymene 557 added Part B 0.21* Kymene 557 added. 2.02 pounds XAD/ton Part C 0.21* Kymene 557 added 2.02 pounds IAD/ton 200 pounds/hour High Purity Asbestos (2.25*) Part D 0,28 Kymene 557 added. 2.02 pounds IAD/ton 353 pounds/hour High Purity Asbestos (4jS) Witnessed and Understood by. 4 UCC 011065 A 1727 9 DISTRIBUTION LIST Messrs, M. P. Ballmer B, K. Barton W. L, Carrlck F. D, Dexter G. L. Dickson B. D. Dobbs T. Dougherty C. P. Gray w. V, Gutzmer p. G. Horecka R. T. Larkin Ji K. Marshall R. A, Miller G. J, Norberg E. J. O'Keeffe >1 R, L, Orme -Myeri,//'' A. Riddle H. B, Rhodes R. T. Scott N. J, Setter H. M, Short J. Sidlovsky R. M, Tong C. A, Wilson W. S. Young Miss, J. Ulrey New York Chicago Bound Brook New York Niagara Palls Cincinnatir New York New York Chicago Detroit Seattle Charlotte Atlanta Charlotte Dallas Los Angeles King City King City Niagara Palls Detroit New York Houston New York New York Chicago New York Bound Brook UCC 011066 A 1 728C j*eJMl Ftt-e. Mr- J. S, McReynolds (4) 960 TIfton Drive Baton Rouge, La. 70815 October 23, 1968 See Attached Distribution International Paper Company Moss Point, Mississippi Asbestos T-135 Mill Trial The attached report contains the data obtained from the paper machine evaluation of Asbestos T-135 at subject mill on October 8, The main purpose of the trial was to determine the compatability of T-135 in their system and to evaluate it as a replacement for PaperAd? As it appeared successful from both aspects, they are now plan ning on running a second trial which will be of longer duration. It would be desirable if we could receive wet-end samples from this next trial, as we were unable to do so during the present one. GLD/bsn Attach, A 17 281 UCC 011067 TECHNICAL SERVICE REPORT I'll -- III 1^ II--il HUM I `T llWllT !! THE EVALUATION OP ASBESTOS T-135 AS A for International Paper Company "* Moss Point, "Mississippi-' ----- gcToEerBTrggjp^ by G. L, Dickson Group Manager - W. L. Carrick Project No. 443-Nil October 22, 1968 UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION Chemicals & Plastics Research and Development Department Niagara Palls, New York 14302 A 17282 UCC 011068 SUBJECT This report covers the paper machine evaluation of Asbestos T-135 at International Paper Company, Moss Point, Mississippi on October 8, 1968- The objective of this trial was to determine the compatability of asbestos in a typical coating grade paper furnish, and to evaluate it as a replacement for a titanium dioxide extender (Paper-Ad), TRIAL RESULTS The results of this trial indicate that Asbestos T-135 can be used as a complete replacement for titanium dioxide extenders in coating-base paper furnishes. No problems were encountered during the trial concerning machine operations, and the substitution of Asbestos T-135 for Paper-Ad resulted in production with better brightness and equivalent opacity properties. Because of the short trial period involved, it was not feasible to monitor their wet-end system at this time. Thus, any increase in filler retention result ing from the addition of asbestos to the furnish was not ascertained, This aspect will, undoubtedly, be considered during a second machine trial which is now being scheduled by their people. DISCUSSION Asbestos T-135 was Introduced into thi-s mill's No, 3 machine system during the production of a white coating base paper, The original intention was to add Asbestos T-135 with their clay slurry in the same ratio as their normal Paper-Ad and clay combinationThis proved to be too viscous; therefore, the slurry was modified to overcome this problem. Their normal slurry combination and that used during the trial are as follows: Normal Clay/Paper-Ad Combination 200 lb. Paper-Ad 600 lb, Clay Made up with water to 533 gallons Clay/Asbestos T-135 Combination 120 lb. Asbestos T-135 680 lb. Clay Made up with water to 533 gallons A 17283 UCC 011069 During this trial there was no titanium dioxide added to the furnish except that which was present in their broke. The addition level of Paper-Ad/cLay combination approximated 12,8 GPM during the pre-trial period, while the T-135/clay slurry was added at a rate of 12,6 GPM. Although the cost of the latter is somewhat higher than their normal mixture, it is felt that the addition level of the T-135/clay was not optimized at this time, CONCLUSIONS The main trial objective, to determine the compatability of Asbestos T-135 in a coating-base stock furnish, was realized- Except for a minor problem involving high viscosity of the clay/Asbestos T-135 slurry, the trial ran smoothly. Production specifications were main tained during the trial and a moderate increase in brightness resultedBecause of the short trial period, no attempt was made at this time to optimize on the addition level of Asbestos T-135* or to determine its effect on filler retention. As both of these are important factors, they will undoubtedly be considered during a more lengthy trial which is now being scheduled. G, L, Dickson/bsn -2UCC 011070 A 17284 Reel Time 7:45 a.m. 9:00 " Average 10:15 a.m. 12:15 p.m. 12:45 " 1:25 " Average TABLE I Analyses of Reel Samples October 8. 1968 t Ash 5.01 4.63 4.82 4,90 4.67 4.77 4.46 4.70 % T10 ? 0.09 0.11 0.10 0,08 0.05 0.09 0,08 0.08 * T-135 0 0 0 0.55 0,86 0.80 0.86 0.77 Opacity 88,6 87.0 87.8 87.2 87.6 87.4 88.0 87.6 Brightness 78.0 77.0 77,5 78.6 79,2 79,2 79 = 2 79,0 UCC 011071 Al?28b UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION MINING A METALS DIVISION MILL TRIAL DATA SHEET October 8, 1968 I. COMPANY LOCATION AND DATE OF TPiAiInternat lonal Paper Co., Moss Point ....Miss. II. company representatives AND titifs Lewis Walker: Assistant to_P.M.-------------Superintendent, Lowell Barfield: Assistant to P.M. Superintendent in. ucc pfppfsfntativfs John McReynolds t Gordon Dickson IV. TRIAL OBJECTIVES (in order of importance) To evaluate Asbestos. T-HS as a-----------replacement for titanium dioxide extenders; V. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION Type of Product Coating-base stockCoated JPJfe/No Grade Name_______ White Label Basis Weight61 5 lb ________ (2^ X 36--500)_____________________ Daily Production____ 110 tonsLb./hour 15375---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Daily Production of Mill (Tissue and Board) No. of Plysr_______________________________________________ -- VI. MACHINE DESCRIPTION Type of MnrhiTM.Fourdrlnlert with pressurized headbox Machine No3(Cylinder) No. of Cylinders. Machine Reel Speed. (Tissue) % Crepe. Wire Mesh. Wire Width. Size Press____Vertical .Machine Trim. Calender Double (0 % ? nips) UCC 011072 A,72s6 VII. AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT Typ* landing (amp.) Saveall (Type)Flow Rate VIII. STOCK PREPARATION - Continuous or Batch Type Beater and Capacity_______________________________________________________ No. of Beater Chests and Capacity______________________________________________ Machine Chest Capacity-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Stock Freeness (Mach. Chest and Stuff Box)_____________________________________ Headbox Consistency____________________________________________________________ Makeup pHMachine pH IX. FURNISH MAKEUP* Basis [Ib./ton, etc.)________________________________________________ Furnish Constituent Bleached Pine Kraft Bleached Hardwood Kraft % Pounds 35 _________________ ^5 __________________ Broke__________________ ____ ZQ___ __________________ Rosin Size Alum .Clay.:- Pre-Trial-------- TrlaJ Paper-Ad-:--Pre-trial Asbestos T-135: Trial ______ ______ *3__ 1.9__ luL 10 lb./ton 10 lb./ton__ Rfit lh,/hnnr pfiil Ih./hnur 288 lb,/hour 170 lb./hour * For board systems include furnish for each madlurn - topllnor, underliner, filler, and backlinor. 2 A 1 7287 UCC 011073 X. ASBESTOS ADDITION - Pellet Repulper (Type). None Asbestos Grade__ Opened -- .--Lot No . Point of Artriitinn Machine Chest__________________________ Pounds of Asbestos Addedper ton BDF------------------per beater p*r hour Per cent asbestos addition on BDF --. ------------------------------- XI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Quality Control Data Record Stock Prep. Log Sampling (in order of importance) Pitch 1 Retention Trial* Reel Trial* Tray Water Tlstaa anrf Towel Stuff box Stuff box Vat Reel Headbox Stuff box Headbox Tray Reel Saveall effluent Saveall effluent Saveall influent Saveall influent Identify samples by name, date, time Wet samples should approximate 500 ml. Weight of BD filter pad is required for all vat, tray, and saveall samples. 3 UCC 011074 A 17288 XII. TRIAL LOG (Comments including changes in furnish and operating conditions) Tim* Pre-trial Trial Normal clay and Paper-Ad slurry added to furnish at 12.8 gal./minute. Slurry make-up 200 lb. Paper-Ad 600 lb. Clay Diluted to 533 gallons (Total Volume) Clay and Asbestos T-135 slurry added to furnish at 12.6 GPM Slurry Make-up 120 lb. Asbestos T-135 680 lb. Clay Diluted to 533 gallons (Total Volume) Recorded by. Witnessed and Understood by. Date. 4 UCC 011075 A 1 7289 DISTRIBUTION LIST Messrs. B. K. Barton L. D. Berger W. L. Carrick F. D. Dexter/ N. J. Setter G. L. Dickson B. D. Dobbs T. Dougherty T. J. Hall P. G. Horecka G E. Kuehn R. T. Larkin J, K. Marshall J. S, McReynolds R. A. Miller G. J. Norberg E. J. O'Keeffe T. R. Orme A. E. Pufahl (2) J. A, Riddle/ * L,, Myer^^l H. B, Rhodes ' R. T. Scott J. Sldlovsky Js H, Stevens Pc H. Thompson R. M0 Tong J. F. Volt F, Jo Welch Miss > J. Ulrey Chicago New York Bound Brook New York New York Niagara Falls Cincinnati New York Brussels, Belgium Chicago Detroit Seattle Charlotte Houston Atlanta Charlotte Dallas Los Angeles New York King City King City Niagara Falls Detroit New York New York Niagara Falls New York New York South Charleston Bound Brook UCC 011076 A1729C