Document gmnyyE0n3M10y2var9Q93w8J
FILE NAME: AZW/W
DATE:^ DOC#: AIP
OCUMENT DESCRIPTIONhZZZZZ ZZ^ZZZW
/, ~~.Oil-efu~{~/)
2.
(1-)
b6-J.Y~
7/-/0t:
~
7e'~
s::;?-- / Y;J
ATLANTA
Corporate Headquarters 3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024
(770) 866-3200 FAX (770) 866-3259
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'_ _n " ' __ _
Cutting of an Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe:
A Work Practice Study
Materials Analytical Services, LLC September 2010
LOS ANGELES
3020 OLD RANCH PARKWAY
SUITE 300 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 WWW.MASTEST.COM
(562) 799-5530
FAX (562) 799-5531
Cutting of an Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe:
A Work Practice Study
Protocol
Summary of Air Sampling Data and
peM Images
Bulk Analysis M-42122
Study 1 NIOSH 7400 &7402 Data
M51855
Study 2 NIOSH 7400 & 7402 Data
M51857
Study 3 NIOSH 7400 &7402 Data
M51863
Photographs
SECTION 1
Cutting of an Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe: A Work Practice Study
Protocol
September 27,2010
Overview:
On February 19,2007 Materials Analytical Services (MAS) received a molded resin based flange with a small piece of pipe from Motley Rice law Firm. According to the documentation the flange/pipe sample had been sent to them by the law firm of Riggs Abney & Turpen. MAS was requested to conduct a work practice study with this pipe by the lanier Law Firm.
The study was designed to measure any airborne asbestos fiber levels during the cutting of the pipe section using various cutting tools. This work practice was divided into three studies. Study 1 will consist of cutting a small section of the pipe with a fine tooth hand saw. Study 2 will cut another small section of the pipe with an electric powered hand saw with a fine tooth blade. Study 3 will consist of cutting a small section of the pipe using an electric powered hand saw equipped with a masonry blade.
Cutting of the Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe
I. ECl Set-Up
A. Study is to be performed in the MAS exposure characterization lab (ECl)
constructed using negative airflow asbestos abatement technology. The size of the ECl is approximately 15' x 20' x 8'. The Eel will be decontaminated before the study.
B. Air exchange inside the ECl during the work phases will be approximately 200 cubic feet per minute as measured at 10' (in middle of 12" ID duct) from the air exhaust of the HEPA filter negative air machine (Force Air 2000 EG).
C. High intensity lighting setup will be in general accordance with the methods described in D.T. Chambers, "Asbestos", John Wiley & Sons, 6,193, 1983 and the Environmental Protection Agency SOP, EPA-Libby-02, Revision #1, March 2001 (Tyndalllighting section only), and the MDHS # 82, "The Dust
- 1~
lamp", March 1997. The high intensity lighting source will consist of three high intensity light (1000 watts ellipsoidal pyrex lens, 219K candle power, 8 degree beam angle) located on each side of the worktable at a height of approximately 5.5 feet from the floor and approximately 7 feet from the work activity.
Study 1: Hand Sawing
11. .!=tackground, Area & Personal Air Samples A. Before the hand sawing work practice study takes place, background air samples will be run in the ECl. B. Adjust and calibrate high volume area pumps to approximately 10.0 liters per minute. C, Set up four area air samples inside the ECL. Use 25 mm air cassettes containing 0.8 micron pore size mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters with a 5.0 micron backing pad. D. locate the background air samples in each quadrant of the ECl at a height of 5.5 feet from the floor and a distance of approximately six feet from the work activity.
E. During this study the four area samples located in each quadrant will be
calibrated and run at a rate of approximately 10.0 liters/minute. These area air samples will be set up as described in section 11 of this protocol. F. The investigator will be fitted with four personal air pumps and air cassettes (two on each shoulder) located in his breathing zone and calibrated at a flow rate of approximately 2.0 to 3.5 liters/minute. Hand Sawing Work Practice G. For this work practice the investigator will use a 13" PVC/ABS plastic pipe saw (Buck Bros.) to cut a y,." to ')12" section off the pipe taken at the end of the pipe. The air sampling information will be recorded on the IH air sampling chain of custody sheets for the study. H. The investigator will wear appropriate protective clothing, work apparel and air supplied respiratory protection equipment.
-2-
I. The work practice will be performed under both ambient and high intensity
lighting. J. The entire procedure will be videotaped with two separate cameras (Sony
Handycam, model numbers HDR-HC3 and DCR-HC). During filming the high intensity lighting will be turned off and overhead lights turned on several times during the study. K. Fabric work clothes samples will be collected off of the investigator after each phase of the study has been completed. L. The field blanks will be opened inside the ECl for 30 seconds after each phase of the study has been completed.
Stud~ 2: Electric Sawing 7% Inch Plywood Blade
Ill. Background. Area & Personal Air Samples A. Before the hand sawing work practice study takes place, background air samples will be run in the ECL. Since this study will be run after the hand sawing study, the ECl's ventilation will be elevated prior to the collection of the background samples for Study 2. The ventilation rate will be increased to 2000 cubic feet per minute for approximately 30 minutes. B. For the background samples adjust and calibrate high volume area pumps to approximately 10.0 liters per minute and the background air samples will be run for approximately one hour. C. Set up four area air samples inside the ECl. Use 25 mm air cassettes containing 0.8 micron pore size mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters with a 5.0 micron backing pad. D. locate the background air samples in each quadrant of the ECl at a height of 5.5 feet from the floor and a distance of approximately six feet from the work activity. E. During this study the four area samples located in each quadrant will be calibrated and run at a rate of approximately 2.0 liters/minute. These area air samples will be set up as described above.
-3-
F. The investigator will be fitted with four personal air pumps and air cassettes (two on each shoulder) located in his breathing zone and calibrated at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 liters/minute.
Study 2: Electric Saw Work Practice
G. For Study 2 the investigator will use a Skil 2.4 hp 7X inch circular saw with
a 7X inch plywood metal blade (Avanti) to cut a 'X" to Yz" section off the
pipe taken at the end of the pipe. The air sampling information will be recorded on the IH air sampling chain of custody sheets for the study.
H. The investigator will wear appropriate protective clothing, work apparel and air supplied respiratory protection eqUipment.
I. The work practice will be performed under both ambient and high intensity
lighting.
J. The entire procedure will be videotaped with two separate cameras (Sony
Handycam, model numbers HDR-HC3 and DCR-HC). During filming the high intensity lighting will be turned off and overhead lights turned on several times during the study.
K. Fabric work clothes samples will be collected off of the investigator after each phase of the study has been completed.
L. The field blanks will be opened inside the ECl for 30 seconds after each
phase of the study has been completed.
Study 3: Electric Sawing-Work Practice
IV. Background, Area & Personal Air Samples
A. Before the second electric sawing work practice study takes place, background air samples will be run in the ECl. Since this study will be run after the Study 2 electric sawing study, the ECl's ventilation will be elevated prior to the collection of the background samples for Study 3. The ventilation rate will be increased to 2000 cubic feet per minute for approximately 30 minutes.
-4-
B. For the background samples adjust and calibrate high volume area pumps to approximately 10.0 liters per minute and the background air samples will be run for approximately one hour.
C. Set up four area air samples inside the ECL. Use 25 mm air cassettes containing 0.8 micron pore size mixed cellulose ester (MC E) filters with a 5.0 micron backing pad.
D, Locate the background air samples in each quadrant of the ECl at a height of 5.5 feet from the floor and a distance of approximately six feet from the work activity,
E. During this study the four area samples located in each quadrant will be calibrated and run at a rate of approximately 2.0 liters/minute. These area air samples will be set up as described above.
F. The investigator will be fitted with four personal air pumps and air cassettes (two on each shoulder) located in his breathing zone and calibrated at a flow rate of approximately 0.5 liters/minute.
Study 3: Electric Saw Work Practice
G. For this work practice the investigator will use a Skil 2.4 hp 7% inch circular
saw with a 7% inch DeWalt masonry blade to cut a %" to Yz" section off the
pipe taken at the end of the pipe. The air sampling information will be recorded on the IH air sampling chain of custody sheets for the study.
H. The investigator will wear appropriate protective clothing, work apparel and air supplied respiratory protection equipment.
I. The work practice will be performed under both ambient and high intensity lighting.
J. The entire procedure will be videotaped with two separate cameras (Sony
Handycam, model numbers HDR-HC3 and DCR-HC). During filming the high intensity lighting will be turned off and overhead lights turned on several times during the study.
K. Fabric work clothes samples will be collected off of the investigator after each phase of the study has been completed.
-5-
L. The field blanks will be opened inside the ECl for 30 seconds after each
phase of the study has been completed.
v. Laboratory Analysis
A. All air sample cassettes will be analyzed by the NIOSH 7400 PCM method
using A counting rules and all personal air samples and 50% of the area samples will be analyzed by the NIOSH 7402 TEM method. B. Fabric samples from the work clothing will be analyzed by the recommended EPA method.
-6-
SECTION 2
Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe
Study 1: Hand Sawing M51855
Background Air Samples
Sample No. A-01-A A-01-B A-01-C A-01-D
Sample Descriotion
IWA IWA IWA IWA
Personal Air Samples
SamRle No. P-1-A P-1-B P-1-C P-1-D
Sample DescriRtion Personal PLR Personal PLL Personal PLR Personal PLL
Area Air Samples
SamRle No. A-1-A A-1-B A-1-C A-1-D
Sample Description
IWA IWA IWA IWA
PCM Fibers/cc <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
PCM Fibers/cc
5.36 1.66 4.87 2.48
PCM Fibers/cc
1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3
NIOSH 7402 0% 0%
NIOSH 7402 97% 92%
NIOSH 7402
PCME Fibers/cc
PCME Fibers/cc
5.20 1.53
PCME Fibers/cc
--.\-\\ ~},;i. Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe
Study 2: Electric Saw, Fine Toothed Blade M51857
Background Air Samples
Sample No. A-02-A A-02-B A-02-C A-02-D
Sample
Descr~tion
IWA IWA IWA IWA
Personal Air Samples
SamJ21e No. P-2-A P-2-B P-2-C P-2-D
Sample Description Personal PLR Personal PLL Personal PLR Personal PLL
Area Air Samples
S9ill.Ele No. A-2-A A-2-B A-2-C A-2-D
Sample Description
IWA IWA IWA IWA
PCM Fibers/cc <0.006 <0.006
0.006 <0.006
PCM Fibers/cc
71.2 106.1 101.3
89.4
PCM Fibers/cc
50.5 46.2 49.2 71.0
NIOSH 7402
PCME Fibers/cc
NIOSH 7402 100%
PCME Fibers/cc
71.2
NIOSH 7402
~-
PCME
Fibers/cc
~
~
Asbestos-Containing Resin Based Pipe
Study 3: Electric Saw, Masonry Blade M51863
Background Air Samples
Sample No. A-03-A A-03-B A-03-C A-03-D
Sample Description
IWA IWA IWA IWA
Personal Air Samples
SamQle No. P-3-A P-3-B P-3-C P-3-D
Sample DescriQtion Personal PLR Personal PLL Personal PLR Personal PLL
Area Air Samples
SamQle No. A-3-A A-3-B A-3-C A-3-D
Sample DescriQtion
IWA IWA IWA IWA
PCM Fibers/cc
0.011 <0.027
0.014 0.008
PCM Fibers/cc
88.8 137.9 148.7
52.6
PCM Fibers/cc
82.5 61.5 90.3 82.0
NIOSH 7402
NIOSH 7402 100%
NIOSH 7402
PCME Fibers/cc
--
PCME Fibers/cc
88.8
PCME Fibers/cc
->.
"Cl ::J
tJ)
en
C")
.!
Q.
E co
tJ)
fco
I/) Cl)
r:::
0
Cl.
E
I'll
Q)
a..
tn
"iC)
r:::
CO
tJ)
N
"Cl
r:::
CO
:I:
1.8
~,' \\,
1.6
1.4
u~ 1.2
D-
...en
G;
> ~
Q)
.c
.sue:n: 0.8
. -'.'
en .<c11 ~ 0.6
0.4
0.2 +--.~.
o
1
Area Samples Hand Sawing Study I
~~~""-"' t
i-"'~-----"V"
'I
2
3
Samples
ii.iliSeries1 . 4
r
1/1
.!
c..
E
10 (f)
o
N
o o
ro o
o
to
o
o
N
'..III Q) 'C eQn) 11
-c..~
".:.C.s.
en
rn
Cl)
encEa
caQ)
et)
...<C
Q)
- "' "C
~
m III
~
ca
Cl)
ii
E
en..c
U)
0 0 l-
-Q)
c:::
i.L
N
..c
~
0'1 C
'j
ecna
L.
Q)
~ 0
Q.
o
00
o
r-
oco
oIt)
o v
o
o
et)
N
o..-
o
..-->.
":Cs
UJ
rn
~
Q.
E
nI
UJ
c.. a. E ~nI
C
0
I/)
Cl)
Q)
III
Q)
Cl)
"C
..!!!
r:o
~
c
0
IIJ
N
nI
:E
'iC)
c
nI
UJ
L. Q)
~
a0 .
o
ID
ov..-
o
N..-
o o
..-
o
CO
o
ID
o v
o
N
o
'"Cl)
0.. E
C'II tI)
C'II
~
c:{
Cl)
'tJ
..!!!
Xl
'" -a c~
0
IJ) Q)
as :E
Eca
.q:
en
...c..
3E
OJ
C
'j
N
C'II
tIl
...(.)
'i:
(.) Cl)
W
o o
o
o
Ol
00
oco
o
LO
o
o
o
N
M51855-012 A-1-0
M51857-006 P-2-B
M51857-012 A-2-D
M51863-005 P-3-A
MS1863-010 A-3-8
SECTION 3
MAS, LLC. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
Page 1 of 1
CLIENT: Motley Rice LLC CONTACT: Wm. Michael Gruenloh PHONE: (843) 216-9563 CLIENT JOB NAME: Lathum-Ameron-Asbestos CLIENT JOB#: CLIENT DOC(S): Letter of transmittal FAX NUMBER: (843) 216-9430
MAS # CLIENT ID
001
asbestos mat
LOCATION
002
rope-like yarn
LOCATION
003
resin base flange
LOCATION
004
resin base flange
LOCATION
VOLUME TYPE MATERIAL
MAS JOB: M42122 DATE RECEIVED: 211912007 SUBMITTED BY: Wm. Michael Gruenloh TRANSPORT: FedEx RECEIVED BY: Nancy Sears CONDITION: samples not sealed
MAS # CLIENT ID
VOLUME TYPE MATERIAL
SAMPLE RECEIVED BY: OCL(\~~ 1--
DATE: dI\a../C:rt
COMMENT: --------------------------------------------------------------------------MAS, LLC.
3945 Lakefield Court
Suwanee, Georgia 30024
(770) 866-3200
...MotleyRice
Wm. Michael Gruenloh
Licensed in se
DiJ:~ Dial843.216.9563 Direct Fax 843.216.9430 MGruenloh@modeyrice.com
February 16, 2007
William Longo, Ph.D. Materials Analytical Services 3945 Lakefield Court . Suwanee, GA 30024
Re: Wilda Jean Lathum, Widow of Jerry H. Lathum, Deceased
Dear Dr. Longo:
Enclosed please fmd a sample 'of the asbestos mat that was manufactured at Ameron's Ardmore Oklahoma facility where Jetty Lathum worked. Also enclosed are: (a) One roll of
small rope-like yarn purportedly used as a gap filler prior to gluing flanges together. We suspect
this may be crocidolite. (b) Two fiberglass..:composite flanges. We suspect these may contain Union Carbide Calidria Resin' Grade asbestos. As.we discussed we would like you to analyze these samples and provide us with your opinion on the content and exposure given the attached
testimony regarding the manufacture and use ofthe materials. by Mr. Lathum.
Testimony has been given stating that Ameron used raw blue asbestos fiber and orc at
, their facility in Ardmore, OK in the manufacture of the aforementioned asbestos mat. Inside the
facility, Ameron employed the use of a hammer mill to crush the raw asbestos ore and fiber.
This hammer mill was not closed off from the rest of the facility. Witnesses have stated that
there was a cloud of dust surrounding the hammer mill and that asbestos dust would hang from
the rafters like Spanish moss. Jerry Lathum worked for Ameron from 1963 until 1971
perfonning various duties. At the time 9fhis departure from Ameron, Lathum worked in Quality
C~mtrol anq penormed his d:U,ties;thro'iighout the plant. I have also included a diagram of the
fability. The dimensions are approximate. There are no enclosed partitions between areas.
,
<.
This case is schedul~d to go to trial o~ September 10,2007. Expert reports are due April
16, 2007 and I expect defense will want to take your deposition sometime before May 16, 2007 (deadline for expert discovery). Please call me if you wish to discuss this case.
WMG/sci cc: Dick Gann
wwwmorleyrke.com MT. PLEASANT
Motley Rice LLG Attotneys .t Law
16 BRlDGll5IDE BlVU
se P.O. Box 179"
MT. PLEASANT.
19465
843-2 16-9000
843-ZI6-94S0 FAX
BARNWtLL
17~O JACKSON ST. PO. Box3t:S BARNWEL~. SC 1981l 8ol-1~88ot) 803-:'S9-7048 FAX
enloh
PROVIDENCE
~ll SOUTII MAIN ST. 1'.0, Box "of.7 PROVIDENCE. RI 02.940 401-457-7700 401-457-7708 fAX
HARTFORl'
ATLANTA
ONE CORPORATli CENnlt
Goo WEn PUCllTIlU ST.
$EtJS er ~o CHURCH ST l7Tl1l'LOOR
HAllTfOlUl. 06101 860-882.0 1681
B60-88Z'168~~~
SUIT 800
ArUoNT.... GEORG'A 30]08
404-101.6900
S 9
F~\~()'1-"i
MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS
Proj#Spl# ClientName Location Type_Mat
M42122 001 Motley Rice LLC
Analyst w.s. Egeland
Date 5/1/2007
ClientSpl asbestos mat
Gross Blueish compressed fibrous mat. Orange granular silt and woody debris observed. Visual
I
OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION
I
Morphology Pleochroism Refract Index
Straight blue/gray 1.690/1.682
~
I
SignA negative
Extinction parallel
Birefringence low Melt no
JI FiberName Crocidollte
ASBESTOS MINERALS
EST. VOL. %
Chrysotile ............................. ..
Amosite...................................
Crocidolite ..............................
100
Tremolite/Actinolite ............. ..
Anthophyllite ..........................
OTHER FIBROUS COMPONENTS
NON FIBROUS COMPONENTS
Binder Description Comments Orange granular silt and woody debris observed. The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated.
MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS
Proj#Spl# ClientName Location Type_Mat
- - - - M42122002
Motley Rice LLC
Analyst W.B. Egeland
Date 5/1/2007
ClientSpl rope-like yarn
Gross Light blue yarn of blue fibers/bundles Visual
I
OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION
I
Morphology Straight
I
Pleochroism blue/gray
Refract Index 1.690/1.682
SignA negative
Extinction parallel
Blrefringence low
I Melt no
I
FiberName Crocidolite
ASBESTOS MINERALS
EST. VOl. %
Chrysotile ............................. ..
Amosite .................................. .
Crocidolite..............................
100
Tremolite/Actino lite ............. ..
A n t h o p h y l l i t e......................... .
OTHER FIBROUS COMPONENTS
NON FIBROUS COMPONENTS
Binder Description Comments
The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated.
MAS, LLC PLM ANALYSIS
Proj#-Spl# ClientName Location Type_Mat
- - - - M42122-003
Motley Rice LLC
Analyst w'B. Egeland
Date 5/1/2007
ClientSpl resin base flange
Gross Broken 1/2 blueish "T" flange of compressed blue and white fibers/bundles with scattered black Hakes, Visual dark damaged area observed.
I
OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION
I
Morphology Straight Pleochroism blue/gray
I straight
none
Refract Index 1.690/1.682
1.620/1.605
SignA negative
positive
Extinction parallel
parallel
Birefringence Melt
FiberName
low no Crocidolite
moderate no
II Anthophyllite
ASBESTOS MINERALS
EST. VOL. %
Chrysotile...............................
Amosite...................................
Crocidolite..............................
40
Tremolite/Actinolite...............
AnthophylJite ......................... .
20
OTHER FIBROUS COMPONENTS
NON FIBROUS COMPONENTS
Mica
3
Binder
37
Binder Description Amorphous material and non-fibrous accessory minerals
Comments
The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated.
MAS, lLC PLM ANALYSIS
ProJ#-Spl# ClientName Location Type_Mat
M42122--004- - -
Motley Rice LLC
Analyst W.B. Egeland
Date 5/1/2007
ClientSpl resin base flange
Gross Blueish ''Tu flange of compressed blue and white fiberslbundles with scattered black flakes, dark Visual damaged area observed.
I
OPTICAL DATA FOR ASBESTOS IDENTIFICATION
I
Morphology Straight Pleochroism blue/gray
I straight
none
Refract Index 1.690/1.682
1.620/1.605
SignA negative
positive
Extinction parallel
parallel
Birefringence Melt
FiberName
low no Crocidolite
moderate no
II Anthophyllite
ASBESTOS MINERALS
EST. VOL. %
Chrysotile...............................
Amosite...................................
Crocidolite..............................
40
Tremolite/Actinolite...............
AnthophyJlite..........................
20
OTHER FIBROUS COMPONENTS
NON FIBROUS COMPONENTS
Mica
3
Binder
37
Binder Description Amorphous material and non-fibrous accessory minerals
Comments
The method detection limit is 1% unless otherwise stated.
Project #: M42122 Vial #:
ANALYSIS BY CHATFIELD METHOD
Sample #: 004
Analyst; WB Egeland
Date: 9/27/2010
MUFFLE FURNACE ASHING RESULTS
Vial weight (A) Vial weight plus sample weight (B) Original sample weight (B-A) Weight pf vial and sample after ashing (C) Sample weight after ashing (C-A)
(Wl) (W2)
13.6595 13.8686
0.2091 13.7887
0.1292
Acid Dissolution Results (After Muffle Furnace Ashing)
Polycarbonate filter weight (D)
0.0160
Filter plus dry sample weight (E)
0.1412g
Sample weight after acid dissolution (E-D)
(W3)
0.1252g
Percent weight of organic material ((WI-W2)/(W1*lOO
38.2%
Percent weight of dolomite/calcite W2-W3)/(Wl*100
1. 9 %
Estimated upper and lower percent asbestos by TEM scan
Upper Lower
85 % 65 %
Percent weight of asbestos (W3/W1)*Lower to (W3/Wl)*Upper
38.9 to 50.9%
SECTION 4
MAS, LLC. PROJECT COC
MAS ID: Client Name:
M51855 ~ Ma~ ter~ ial~ s A~ na~ lyt~ ica~ l S~ erv~ ice~ s - Atla- nt- a --
Project Name: ECl AC Resin Pipe Cutting Hand Saw Stu
Logged By: -d-dm--ou-n-t---------------------
TRANSPORT INFORMATION:
Client Job No: Client PO: Date In:
Client Code:
9/28/2010 MASCORP
Submitted By: Michael Mount, CIH
Delivery By: Hand Delivery
Received By: Condition:
Nancy Sears -go-o~d-----------------------
---------------------------
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Documents: COC Commen~furCOC: _______________
Contact:
Bill longo
Title: First Name: Last Name:
Mr. William
longo
Suffix
Work Phone: (770) 866-3200
- - - Other Phone: ----------- Fax: (770) 866-3259
Ext:
Ext: ------
#
Client ID
000
lab blank
001
A-01-A
002
A-01-B
003
A-01-C
004
A-01-D
005
P-1-A
006
P-1-B
007
P-1-C
008
P-1-D
009
A-1-A
010
A-1-B
011
A-1-C
012
A-1-D
013
A-1-E
014
FB-1-1
015
FB-1-2
SAMPLE INFORMATION:
Volume
#
0 1704.3 1696.7 1715.7 1719.5 20.1 21 33 32.3 90.7 89.5 89.3 90 1160 0 0
Client ID
RECEIVED BY:
SIGNATURES
(\n.o~k~~ ~
Volume
INDUSTRIAL hI GIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY
-MAS -.-'f. . ;>( ~1%';t
COMPANY NAME lifts L L. c. j ~{~ Iq.
ADDRESS:
Page
of _-1...._
2~ 5 ~Ff'/(
7tf F
6,z% RH
3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259
PHONE: FAX:
SAMPLING DATE:
(Y\ 6 \865
TURNAROUND TIMES:
___ 1 DAY
_ _ _ 3 DAYS
_ _ _ STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS
DATE I SAMPLE
NUMBER
SAMPLE LOCATION
ItqJ27/A-lDl-.41 g~~, /l.J{;,
SAMPLE MEDIA
I [). <g L\NI'. M(
1-rIOt 1---tvo,''' ~~ f1 \iF 11
..... _I , I \ W '~}'
le. L-----AJP~i'~QI\.Xl LJCtJJ1Jm,k~ .... t f{
r ,. ' I I
131
l...
c..1
fl..
\ I J/ 0 I J.;
'Lt
~.
.to 1/l--.L__ L.lll-flt:A. lX~__f;;~m~
BJ"" I "
fl /,4 ~
<.. I 1
,~u)
I
I I I J nl I
1--
-V(JJ
"" eJ ~ . I J... Du.-T:<; ; J~ .G:CL
1r.f?-I-IIFr~tr:tI1/A:v){~
'.J..'-'" - .).. IF"!?- 1-2.1
IJ.,-
ANALYSIS
7~O,
I
\1/
DESIRED
START TIME
STOP TIME
7JfO'i.. / 'c;.;J'S-I~'tS 7'7{[.2..
W .v
,t+O:;.112; iZ Il'::z.:.l.~
7'102
74:()~
'-tiNY.,
V I
/1 :03 j'~
I
,40;)..1 ./
A
7~21/
~ I
TOTAL
PRE POST AVG.
TIME
FLOW FLOW FLOW
MINUTES
RATE LPM
RATE LPM
RATE LPM
1Cl0 JF. 'i 'fj,t)Lf I ~.'1":l
I~qtl ~.43
eLl J?,t'i mm'1,()J
\V I 'f, i I~.(f~ IqJDr' 10 I i,c~ "l,,9~1.i.Of :~,Jl)1 J..JJI I ~t rD
~) ~ I l:l._~_L:J/"'l
., J, J 1 1" i;;2...l:t.2.3 1'1,D'f1 ~ 1'<J/~7'1
18fqS-I~.q41 ~/1t'
3/lr:1 R,q '-If.3.] _it' I f),q1 I 'tieol <:f)J6 lltomIID,/) I ID; 0 1/0.0
'15lJZ1'O
t:>1 /"'I ID
CD. si 854:>
v .-r- 1p"A-a~~1 IF"Ab"ic- - GGfDf'<"-
v - z IFJ}J7-f-.l..l V - Af+~f'
~F"'A:b"i<'\L6:,P,q F/f>JN<:. iM."uj_1
((Jh i t-t. lL.. ...v.
~
. / ,. v
Total Volume
Llters
L':lALf..3 ~:H~;7
"1 Le 1
~'1-Jq . S"' '<0, I
AJ ,Q 3:LC1 3:Z.L 3
~3-: f}q,~
S'Cr,'] qDLO
otl (..o,{j
o
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
First Transfer by: Second Transfer by:
Third Transfer by:
NAME
I-tU:LE~
I
I !lJIl-J
T
I
COMPANY L l,.. ' -
MODE OF
TRANSFER
-0;';:;]
LOG IN DATE
RECEIVED BY
q-d'6-(O (, ~O-~
COMPANY
mA'S
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-001
Client Sample ID: -----------A---0-1--A----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
8.97 190
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
1704.3
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
2
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF)
Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I
2.Slfiberstmm'
Notes:
o o
o o
o
0.5
o
Calc. of FiOOr Cone.(C) in FiOOrs/cm' bers/cm3
Media Type: 25 rrvn MCE Fitter Um~ of Ouant~lon (LOO) = 7 fiOOrslmm 2
Filler counts outside tne 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabilily and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed 8y:.;.;M.;;...;..M..;..o..;..u.;.;nt;....-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - Date:
9/26/2010
- - - - - - Date:
10/1/2010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
MS1855-002
Client Sample ID:-----------A---0-1--B----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
8.93 190
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
1696.7
Total Flbers Counted, Sample (FCS)
3.0
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FL8)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber DensIty (I:) in Fibersl mm2
E=I
3.8lfiberslmmt
o
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
c=\1 <
o.o021\flbers/cm1
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limit of auant~ion (LOO) = 7 fibers/mm 2 Fiber coonts outside tile 1CJO.1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal variabil~y and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _ _9/_2_812_0_1_0
Reviewed 8y:.;.;M,;,;,.,;,;,M;.;.o.;...un....;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _ _1_01_112_0_1_0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 -
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-003
Client Sample ID:-----------A---0-1--C----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
190 9.03
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
1715.7
o o
o 0 0.5 o
o o o 0 o o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
2.0
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Tolal Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted; Blank(FLB)
-,.,---"o"'--_.--
100
Area of Filler, mm2 (AF)
Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
_------ ... 385 0.00785
Calc. of Flber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2
E",I
2.Slflbers/mm'
Notes:
1.5
o
o 0.5
Calc. of Flber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm'
C l!::======
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fi~er limit of Ouant~ion (LOO) = 1 floors/mm 2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1:JOO fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabll~y and are probably biased
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _ _9;.,/2;.,8;.;.,;12;;.,;0_1,;..0
Reviewed By: .:.;M,;.;,.;.;.M:.;;o.:;un.:.;I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _ _1_o_/1_/2_0_1_o
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-004
Client Sample ID:
A-01-D
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
190 9.05
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
1719.5
Total Fibers Counted. Sample (FCS)
0.5
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
o ~'_"'_'_"'_A'_
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area. MM2 (GFA)
385
- - -0.-00-78-5- -
Calc. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm'
E=I
O.6lfibers/mm2
Notes:
o o o o o o 0.5 o
Calc. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/cm'
c <
0.00 Ibers/cmJ
Media Type: 25 rml MCE Fitter
lim~ of Ouant~ion (LOO) =7 firers/mm 2
Firer counts outside the 1Q()..1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal varlabil~ and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland Reviewed By: M. Mount
------------------------
-------- Dale:
9/28/2010
Date: _ _ _1.;..0/_1/_20.;...1_0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-005
Client Sample ID:
P-1-A
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, L1ters/Minute (FR)
_ _ _ _ _ 1 0 _ _ _ _w ____
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
2.01
Total Sample Volume. Liters (V)
20.1
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
101
46
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Calc. of Fiber Density (El in Fibersl mm2
E:;;I
279.71fibersfmm2
Notes:
11
19
19 31.5
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(e) in Fibers/cm' berslcm'
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FI~er Limrt of Ouantrtion (LOO) 7 fibers/mm 2 Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal var1abilrty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _ _9_12_8/_20_1_0
Reviewed By: -M-. -M-ou-n-t ----------------
Date: _ _ _1,,;,;.0/,,;,;.1/_20;,.;1..;.,0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-006
Client Sample ID: -----------P---1---B----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR)
2.1
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
10
Total Sample Volume, Lilers M
21.0
Tolal Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
70.5 100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
.. o ~-;-,-,--100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
... _--38-5--0.00785
Calc. of Fiber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2
E=I
8R81fioors/mma
Notes:
18.5 6.5 21 14.5
Calc. of Flber Cone.(C) In Floors/cm'
c l!::=:========1.,;.,.;;-
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter
Limn of Quantilion (LOO) =7 fiOOrs/mm 2
Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabilijy and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _-...;.9_/2_8/_20.;..1_0
Reviewed 8Y:.;.;M,;;.',;,;,M;.;.ou.;.;.n,;;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _ _1..;..0/_1/_20;...1_0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-007
Client Sample ID:
P-1-C
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
----------------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
3.39 10
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
33.9
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FlS)
Total Fibers Counted. Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FlB)
101
30
",--_#1o<'_--,30
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M~ (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I
,428.9Iftbers/mm2
Notes'
10.5
28
30
15
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fiberslcm'
c=I k = = = =
Media Type. 25 mm MCE Finer Llmtt of Quant~lon (LOO) ~ 7 fiOOrs/mm 2
Floor counts outside the 1()Q.1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _.....;.9...;;/2~812_0~1_0
Reviewed By: .;.M,;;..;.;.M....;.o.;.un.;.;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 10/112010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-008
Client Sample ID: -----------P---1---D----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
3.23 10
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
32.3
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
103
63
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
_--..--_ - ... o ...-
__ _ 100 ~._"_AI'_"'
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2
E=I" "....:( 208,31fibers/mm2
Calc. of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm'
Notes:
Media Type. 25 mm MCE Fi~er Llmtt of Quantttion (LOO) = 7 fibers/mm 2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal variabil~y and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Date _ _....;..9/;.,;;2..;.8/;;;;,.20;.,;1_0
Reviewed 8y:...;M..;....;.M..;.0...;un..;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 10/1/2010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-009
Client Sample ID:-----------A---1---A----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, LiterslMinute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
9.07 10
Total Sample Volume, Uters (V)
90.7
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted. Samples (FLS)
101.5 32
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
o .,,,....,_.,._-,,,_fli-",,,,,
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385
. _ ...0.....0.. 0_78-5- -
Cale. of FiOOr Density (El In FiOOrsl mm2
E==I
404:.1 )fiberslmm2
Notes:
19.5 44.5 6.5
7
Gale. of Floor Gone.(G) in Floors/cm'
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FI~cr Lomit of Quantnion (LOO) = 7 fioors/mm ' Fiber counts outside the 1()()'1300 flbers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Reviewed By: -M-. -M-ou-n-t ------------------
-------- Date:
9128/2010
- - - - - - - Date:
10/1/2010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-010
Client Sample ID: -----------A---1---B----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, L1ters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
10 8.95
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
89.5
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
101.5
41
Total Flbers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
- - - -38-5- - -
- - -0.-00-78-5- -
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2
E=I
315.4lflbers/mm2
Notes'
13.5 14.5 32.5 13.5
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/cm' C l!=====
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FIner Lim~ of Ouant~1on (LOO) ~ 7 fiberslmm'
Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater ihan optImal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _ _9_/2_8/_20_1_0
Reviewed By: M. Mount
---------------------------
Date: _ _ _1.;.;0/.;.;1/_20;..1..;..0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-011
Client Sample ID:
A-1-C
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
--------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, LiterslMinute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (TI
8.93 10
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
89.3
3.5 o o
0.5
2
3.5
16 2.5
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
101.5 47
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of FiOOr Density (El in FlOOrsl mm2
E=I: .7, , ..275~ 11fibers/mm2
Notes:
28.5
15
11
19
Cale. of FiOOr Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm'
C I.!:====
Ibers/cm'
Media Type: 25 rrun MCE FIHer
Lim~ of auanl~lon (LOa) =7 fibersimm 2
Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. 8. Egeland
Oate: _ _ _9/_2_8/_20_1_0
Reviewed By:-M-. -M-ou-n-t -----------------
Oate: _ _-..;.1.;;..,0/..;.;.1/,;;;.20;.,;1.,;;..0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 1 .
MAS Project:
Hand Saw
MAS Sample #:
M51855-015
Client Sample ID: -----------F-B---1--2----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
o oo
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR)
o
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
o
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
o
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
...,,----o_._.-
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I~ ..
7.0lfiberslmm2
Notes:
o o o o
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
Media Type: 25 rrvn MCE Fi~er Limft of Ouantmon (LOO) ~ 7 fiberslmm 2
Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibersJmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabilfty and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Reviewed 8y:.;.;M..;.;....;.;.M;.;.o.;;;un..;.;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - 9/28/20-10
Date: _ _ _1_0/_1/_20_1_0
MAS
CLIENT NAME:
TEM ANALYSIS M51855-001
Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
CLIENT SAMPLE ID:
A-01-A
7402 ANALYSIS
Sample Areal Volume: Filter Type: Pore size:
Effective Filter Area: Sample type: Analysis type:
Grid Acceptance
17Q4.3 MCE25mm
0,8 385 Air
r 7402 "~ES
Liters 3 %
Date Analyzed: Analyst:
10/4/2010
~"
_ _ A~'
A,Keeton
Scope Number:
2
Accelerating Voltage:
100
KV
Indicated Mag:
25
KX
Screen Mag:
_ A,,~~~~ _ _
~"'~~~~A
KX
Grid_box:
7707
~
Number of grids: 3 NUlllbel' of openings: 40
Average Grid Size: 0.012210
#1: [!1~ #3: ~
#2: ~ #4: I:!:!i:
Total Area Analyzed:
Asbestos
o
Non-asbestos, o
% Asbestos .0"-1
""""~-~~"~
SIri! ~qll:"dD
NSD C6-Bl
NSD B2
NSD 83
,~
NSD 84
!
NSD 85
NSD 86
I,!'
NSD E7
'I
NSD E8
NSD E9
NSD E10
NSD G4
NSD G5
NSD G6
NSD G7
NSD G8
NSD G9
NSD Gl0
NSD 15
NSD 16
NSD 17
NSD C7-84
NSD B5
NSD 86 L NSD 87 I
NSD 88
NSD B9
NSD Bl0
NSD H6
S ze
I _I
NSO H7 NSO HB NSO H9 NSO H10 NSO C8-A8 NSD A9 NSD A10 NSO 02 NSO D3 NSO 04 NSD H7 NSO H8
# Gr:o Op 40
______ M51855 ~)() I _Sampk COPlIlwnt,;
~backiiround
_~
MAS
CLIENT NAME:
TEM ANALVSIS M51855-002
Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
CLIENT SAMPLE ID:
A-01-B
7402 ANALYSIS
Sample Areal Volume: Filter Type: Pore size:
1696.7
MCE25mm
0,6
Liters
Date Analyzed: Analyst:
Scope Number:
101412010
-
~-~~~~
AKeeton
2
Effective Filter Area:
385
Accelerating Voltage:
100
KV
Sample type:
Air
Indicated Mag:
25
KX
Analysis type:
Grid Acceptance r~'
7402 YES
3 %
Screen Mag:
20
,~~,---~-~
,
KX
Grid_box:
7707
I' 3 ' - - Number of grids:
l Number of openings: 40_
#1: 110 #3: l~
#2: 1111 #4: 111
,-
~
r I Average Grid Size: 0.012210 Total Area Analyzed:
0.488 ,.
Asbestos
o
Non-asbestos
o
% Asbestos 0
Srr/I SquarelD'
SI7C
NSO D6-A4 NSO A5 NSD A6 NSD AB NSD A9 NSD A10 NSD B5 NSD B6 NSD B7 NSD B8 NSO B9 NSD B10 NSD 04 NSD D5 NSD 06
NSO D7 [ NSO 05 I
NSO 09 !
NSD 010 NSD F7 NSO D7-F10 NSD G2 NSD G3 NSD G4 NSO G5 NSO H6 NSD H7
NSD H8
NSD H9
NSD H10
NSD 08-B5
NSD B6
NSD 67
NSD D6
NSD D7
f~~
NSD D8
NSD D9 '"
NSD 010
NSD G1
'w~ _ _
NSD G2
# Gnd Op 40
Iv! -) Ig55 002 _ Sampk COI:,t.:nclIls
IS?-b~~~~"7ound _____ '~____~'_"""~__
.. ~..~-.. --......]
MAS
CLIENT NAME:
TEM ANALYSIS M51855-005
Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
CLIENT SAMPLE ID:
P-1-A
7402 ANALYSIS
Sample Areal Volume: C=20.1
Liters
Filter Type:
MCE=25=-m-m~~
Date Analyzed: Analyst:
9/29/2010 A.Keeton
Pore size:
0.8
Scope Number:
2
Effective Filter Area: Sample type: Analysis type:
385 Air 7402
, Accelerating Voltage:
100
KV
Indicated Mag: ... -.~.... 25
KX
Screen Mag:
20
KX
Grid Acceptance
YES
5 %
Grid_box:
7707
__(. .,.,
NUllIbel' of grids: j
#l: . llO #3: IllO
Number of o!)cuings: '. ~~. #2: lIt tl4: rilL
62
Average Grid Size: 0.012210 Total Area Analyzed:
0.488
% Asbestos 96..~81
S ftf. :;'InrrI!)
: ;IJCf lyp': ,.. '11 Size
E6B5
~;1;J9i!iiit~-- ,... .......,i' 8.2 0.45
2 88 r"-llc!ocido[t~,' -. u"i 51 0.3
3 4
89
I
liCrocldolite
:~- lICrocldolite
14
-----,
5.5
0.5 0.8
I
I [A1f.lQJL~Y!!L I/~'A'''''''M
,,,,,UP""''''
5
5.7
[ 6
nlhoplY ite
9
0,45
NSO C4
7
C5
.AnthoJi!.iii~:~...
256
1.5
8
.Ji!1thophylitL,
17,7
0.3
9
I I
jCrocidoli:o
6.5
04
10
I
icrocidolite
5,3
0.45
11
iAnthop\wuie-_
55
0.6
12
j\n~~'0W)Y
6
05
13
C8
Cru?;don;
18
0.3
14
C9
15
'A,,!~~op,hy,IiJ~L
11.7
0.6
,AnH)Q!?tlYlit~~_ .. ~
58
0.8
16
IIi\rlthoohylite
68
1
17
IICrocldohle
5.5
0.4
18
\Q[oCIl2q!ite
10.5
0.4
19
l\n,t,hoQhylite,~ ..
20
I'"
C10
An~hophylite
187
06
59
0.6
21
08
22
23
,CroqdOlite . _
~ ~c:rqi99!i\@,
Anthophyllto
135
045
24.3
16
10.8
1.8
24
:Anthophyli\e
9
1.5
25
NSD 09 26 DiD
;()o.cidoljt~.~, \.:\
225 69
11 045
'''['''I,ll
Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
SAED
Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Arnphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Arnphibole Arnphlbole Amphlbole
Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Arnphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole
Ambiguous
Ambiguous
27
5.7
0.6
28
6.7
0.3
29
E7
5.2
0.45
30
c::J[G!PKJ~lil~L__. ..1 20.7 0.5
.__ 31
E8 L.::.:::.J~~.Ylite
J 6.5
1
32
Lw.... J[ootb.QPpY~Je_._,,_ I 15.7 1.5
33
C::Jft.rith.ophy!it~" ,,'..I 11.2 0.8
L.__ 34
jrAr;lhophYijfil~-':---l 8,8
0.6
I 35
![t.nI!JPPQylite. _ ..:::] 13
0.5
,-'-... J 36
[':::=]l&1.t~9P6Y.IiJ!l.
5.9
0.4
37
L_J[Q:QQr!Qli!L. . ,.~ 9.6
0.3
I I 38
I.Crocidplile
32,4
0.3
39
L_JIQ~Q_cLdqt~L.m._._j 5.3 0.45
40
E9
1.~J[Grog<-iC-J-!i_t.E.1.._.-."'-.::.:..J1
9.6 5.2
0.45
41
0.8
NSD E10
42 E7-62
9
0.5
43
NSD 63
14.7
0.5
44
B4
9.8
45
6.5
46
85
14.7 045
47
6.3
0.3
48
B8
9.5
0.3
49
B9
5.9
0.6
50
16.7
51
5.3
0.3
52
B10
NSD D2
7.1
0.3
NSD D3
53
D4
8
NSD E1
NSD E2
NSD E3
NSD E4
54
G3
9.8
NSD G4
55
G5
13.1
1
56
NSD G6
6.9
0.3
NSD G7
57
G8
9
0.3
58
405
1
59 E8-B7
103
60
6.5
0.5
61
62
NA
I 28.1
0.45
13
04
NSD B8
Loo]
NSD 63
C2 G3
I
,:--
~:;e.nt~;p;;jJle
J
J 11 2
0.5
64
l[QrQigojit~l 18
0.6
65 NSD G8
'lAnthophYlJte
J 9
0.4
~ '::::'-1 _ _ . _
--]
Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphlbole
Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphlbole Amphlbole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Ambiguous
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Ambiguous
Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
# Grid Op 40
.. .. M51855 005 Sample Comments:
~~~~i,~i~w.~ w.~ ~~~~
~
I
SI
f.
:l, X-II.y (".,qV (K.V)
1Q,2.4
o
10,24
$1
o
N. 2,56
F.
5.12 X'R>y EMrqy (l<eV)
I1
$1 F.
10.24
Sl
o F. S.U
XR.y E..,?y O(.,v)
SI
3n r----1--------------------~
F.
5.12 lHhy n.,ryV (K.V)
J 10.24
SI
Jr--------------i----------------------------------------------------------------------~ni
F. 5.12 }H<.y Ent"l? (Ko\l)
SI
r. o
o
5.12 X-R.y En<'9Y (K.V) - - - - - - --------.-------------~~--------
SI Mg
Fe
5.12 X-R.y M'9Y (K<'I)
Si
Q $,12,
X-Ray EM'?Y (K~V)
SJ
o
0.00
r.
F.
~~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _$~i_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~
d
393
"~V
196
F.
11 ~i''''!~,~,~",~ ,-J.~;" Jl..&........ ....
,u..,..t........
0.00
1',213
2,'6
J,IN
S,12
6.>lQ
7.!>13
)H<lV norgv (Ko\!)
S.IZ
)!'Roy Enor9Y
._---
(K
-
.V)
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
.
.
.
_
-
-------
MAS
CLIENT NAME:
TEM ANALYSIS M51855-006
Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: :
P-1-B
7402 ANALYSIS
Sample Areal Volume: Filter Type:
21
MCE25mm
Liters
Date Analyzed: Analyst:
10/4/2010
~~~~~,~
"~~
A Keelon
Pore size:
08
Scope Number:
2
Effective Filter Area: Sample type: Analysis type:
Grid Acceptance
385 Air 7402 YES
~~--
3 %
Accelerating Voltage: Indicated Mag: Screen Mag: Grid_box:
100
KV
25
KX
20
KX
7707
Numbcr of grids: Number of openings:
~3 40
Averagc Grid Size: 0.012210
i #1: ilo #3: 1110_
#2: ~ #4: [ 11~
I"" ......._--"' Total Area Analyzed:! 0.488
Asbestos
22
Non-asbestos r-
~Irfi SqllareJI)'
Size
~AEl)
NSD D9-B2
B3
18.1
0.9
Amphibole
Amphlbole
NSD B4
NSD 85
NSD B6
NSD 87
NSO B8
NSO C1
2
C2
l_. __ /l.n!t)ophylite
NSD C3 I
NSO C4
9
0.6
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
NSD CS
...
3
C6
IIAnt!).9phylite __
9
045
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
>/
4
C7
!Anthophylite
NSO
5
CB C9
Lr.
;A'nthophyllte
6
Anthophylile
7
:Al1lhophyilte
7.3
045
Amphibole
Amphlbole
if
11.5
1
Amphibole
Amphibole
>/
143
2
Amphlbole
Amphibole
v'
13.5
1.5
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
;vf'
8
;'n1hjIlbYljte. __ ...
105
Amphibole
Amphlbole
~/I,
9
9
05
Ambiguous Ambiguous
NSO C1D
NSD G6 "' .
NSD G7
I
NSD G8
10 010-82
11
[
12
I
13
I
.''6n,thophylite le
Anthophylite
95
0.5
13
06
63
04
135
06
Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole
Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole
NSD 63
14
64
NSD B5
226
0.6
Amphlbole Amphibole
i
I I
I J
NSD B6
r L_
15
67
22.5
AmphibOle Amphibole
11
16
B8
15.6 0.4
Ambiguous Nol'le
17
B9
18
1
Amphibole Amphiboie
NSD D3
~ j
NSD F4
NSD E9-B1
NSD 62
18
63
19
20
21
64
L
LI
10.2
2
Amphibole Amphibole
:J 13.8
0.4
Amphlbole Amphibole
5.2 0.45
Amptllbole Amphlbole
I~
15.9 1.1
Amphlbole Amphibole
I r
I
22
7.2 0.45
Amphibole Amphiba!e
[
NSD B5
LJ
NSD B6
[J
NSD ., '1 G2
>::d'--:::-:::~ ::=~ -,,~
~,~~
23
G3 L !~DtlJRRh.Ym(l
-. 13.5 0.45
All1phibole Amphlbole
:-j
r' 24
G4
':crocT~lti;"--"
11 3 0.5
Amphibole Amphlbole
L NSD G6
# Grid Op
40
M5\855 006 S!Ul1plc .<::\)mm~m~.: ..
Ipe;'sonalleft~'
F.
o
0,00
1.28
256
3,84
5,12 X-R'~ Ene-[~ (KW)
10,24
"~------------- ~--- - - - -
. Si
8~~----------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
o o co
'] 56
3.84
5.12 KR.V EM"n (!f..V)
10.24
F.
5.12 )(-R,y [0.'91 (K.V)
o
F.
2.56
5.IZ ;..:"r;:.t~ Enkl'.)~~ (K<tV)
Si
6~r-----------------t-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~
Mg 89
Fe
5,11 l(-R,)y E",..tU\, (KeV)
U....tl''''. 128,9
MSIS55'OO';'OO6,
-~---- - - - - - - - - - -
- --1991'
\493
9~5 $,
-
497
M'1
0
LL L "'
C,GO
"'1t",,);~.; t h~ "'" , , . . . !
-.1 i F.
, .
....1..'... I'
"*t
2.56
5.12
X-R,'1 F.""'l'l [Y.<l:\I)
Oh
.g3 ~-----------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
Mg
o
I) 00
L2B
2.56
5.12 };'lhy E".'9Y (K.\I)
t1
Si
,&r-------------.---------------------------------------------------------------~rl
1
o
C,)O
Fe
5,:2 X-R,y Ene'91 (t:.lV)
103 10.24
Si 41
0.00
Si 10,24
o
0.00
5,12 ):-Rw Enol?~' (f:.V)
MAS, LLC. PROJECTCOC
MAS ID: Client Name:
M51857 ~M~ ate~ri~ als-A-na-ly-tic~al~S-er- vic-es-A~tla-n- ta---
Project Name: ECl AC Resin Pipe Cutting Electric Saw
Logged By: -d-dm--ou-n-t---------------------
TRANSPORT INFORMATION:
Client Job No: Client PO: Date In: Client Code:
9/28/2010 MASCORP
Submitted By! Michael Mount, CIH
Delivery By: Hand Delivery
Received By: Condition:
Nancy Sears -go-o~d-----------------------
---------------------------
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Documents: COC
Comments for COC: - - - - - - - - -
Contact:
Bill longo
Title: First Name: Last Name:
Mr. William
longo
Suffix
Work Phone: (770) 866-3200 Ext:
- - - Other Phone:
Ext:
-------- - - - Fax: (770) 866-3259
#
Client ID
000
lab blank
001
A-02-A
002
A-02-B
003
A-02-C
004
A-02-D
005
P-2-A
006
P-2-B
007
P-2-C
008
P-2-D
009
A-2-A
010
A-2-B
011
A-2-C
012
A-2-D
013
A-2-E
014
FB-2-1
015
FB-2-2
RECEIVED BY:
SAMPLE INFORMATION:
Volume
#
o
460
448
445.5
455
3
2.9
3.05
3.25
10.2 10.2
10 10.8
900
o o
Client ID
SIGNATURES
Volume
.. ..MAS. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY I
~
~\~~
\,11)11<
COMPANY NAME MIfs} L.. 1-<" - De,pt I Y.
ADDRESS:
PROJECr NUMBER: PROJECr NAME:
Page
of ~
~t2. C.F;r\
7l,gcr
<c311 % fU+
3945 Lakefield Court
Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259
PHONE: FAX:
SAMPL.lNG DATE:
~ 5\ COG";}
TURNAROUND TIMES:
___ 1 DAY
_ _ _ 3 DAYS
___ STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS
I DATE I SAMPLE
SAMPLE
ANAL.YSIS DESIRED
START
STOP
TOTAL. TIME
FPLROEW1 FpLoOsWt 1 FALVOGW.
VToolutaml e
NUMBER
SAMPL.E LOCATION"
MEDIA
TIME
TIME
MINUTES
RATE LPM
RATE LPM
RATE LPM
Litera
fC1J;{,7-].4~to~-AII:lt1d{d-;'~u~clL-NE- IOS?I.Lom mGIi"11qoo,'7f[o:;:z.,. I [;t>S' 1/,'<"-:<;"", 1 _l:)~ Iq,1 1'l,2 1'1.1.. 1-'fbIT
________ ___ Jil'~r~ ~~~ -~_J _ _=~ J
J' .~
I f
I I
1 -,
1 s,CJq.T"'.OT~f.qi-1 t)q. 7
-c: I
~w
I I
I J I I I ,. -I f..et fTf~Ol (p,q I 1.Q.tJ.t;r
~ f) [
~
ijii)
TJ/ I J/ / J / ljJoor~~fr-T<f:f I ~I.J,S.~.
Ip-L - If IP<ef'SWvO 1. O"JflJ~. R..
\ . 1 l,to5..TI:T:tI2: ~ 1 I S" L. ~ 1 I In "L ;t raO L '3 ,00
1\ I I iJ t
" _ J - L_J~I __L_ .:1!t_u.I __ L.L--.--LI __ L_--l::rLI.~ .Sfl ':(.t:tO
r cl
Rn I . t i l l I l - -rn't-~-~21.t"D I > ~ J , /1 JJe:"
e \If I V-
.__----.L_.LJ J
_.... __ lJ~ L_---.LJI . 1,'2-1 ,~81 .145 , 3,~<)
_____ I.4V"':z..-A17f:P~~-~~-~-~-AJ~- -T~-- . . . mrJ==--=z_@~T--=~mlmllm. I 1:Z,Ctf I:i.J~lJ.I:l ,6)lil 16:;i
,e .~ I I
tD_ J ._~.sel_ ......._.! J ..~ __-'"]tf:Qi.l--=tn _____CI~r=I~mmJgJ 00 IJlI4171.2 If , it>. 7_
r '7'10')..
l~fl-2. -.2l . ~ -.~J/.-----
Im,mJ;
F~-m 7tfo2. I ~
1..._____1 T----~
([)
("<15 \~~ ~
r
r
V
It.-.4A ~.2.-11~ I-d liT ):"~ A,,:c.. r3oe_/j3cd'~ I Pit hI> c 16.,4 1ll<:::B..lfl-r---':"'l ..........--=:::Fnn7T-n~
~ I J/ ~-2J J/ ~Ir~;.--r----~--_nr--~V
l~ I~ ~-T~ 17
I-'
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
First Transfer by: Second Transfer by:
Third Transfer by:
NAME
COMPANY
W/I.J ,.;.,..,. /y#~ !d?/J:$ t..t.c,
MOD~~
TRANS R
n~h;"
LOG IN DATE
RECEIVED BY
COMPANY
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 -
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-001
Client Sample ID:
A-02-A
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, LlterslMlnute (FR)
9.2
10
Sample Time, Minutes In
50
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
460
o o o o oo o oo o o o o o o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
4.5
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FlB)
100
Area of Filter. mm2 (AF) Gratieule Field Area, M~ (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I '
5:7lfiberS/mm2
o
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fmer Limn of Quantnlon (LOO) = 7 fiOOrs/mm 2 Fiber counts outslde the tOO-l300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabilrty and are prObably biased,
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Reviewed By:.;.M.....M....o...u..n..t;....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:
9/2812010
--......;.;.;=.;..;.;.
- - - - - - - Date:
9/28/2010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-002
Client Sample ID: -----------A---0-2--B----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
o o
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
8.96 50
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
448
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
3.5
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
o
100 ""'-';#_<I#_<t*_ .. _
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I
4.5lfibers/mm2
Notes:
o
o 1.5
2
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) In Fibers/cm'
C
ibersfem'
Media Type. 25 mm MCE FIHer
Lima of Quantftion (LOO) = 7 floors/mm 2
Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optImal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed 8y:.;.;.M..;..;..;.;.M;.;,0.;;,;un.;.;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 9/28/2010
Date: ---.;;...;.;..;9../;2.;8.;/;2..0;.1.;0;..
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 . MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade MAS Sample #:
M51857-003
Client Sample ID:
A-02-C
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) ...........- ---- ""'-~...8......91 .......-,...-
10
Sample Time, Minutes IT)
50
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
445.5
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
5.5
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E"I
7 2 .Olfibers/mm
1.5
1.5
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) In Fibers/em'
C I!:::,===
tbers/cm'
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Finer Lim~ of Quantrtion (LOO) ~ 7 fibers/mm 2
Floor counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabllrty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _.....;.9;.;;/2,;;.;.8/..;;.20;...;1..;..0
Reviewed By: ,;;.;.M.:..:..,.;.:..M:,:.ou;;.;.n.;.:..t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 9/281201 0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 .
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-004
Client Sample ID: -----------A---0-2--0----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, liters/Minute (FR)
9.1
iO
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
50
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
455
Notes:
o 0
o o o
o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
4
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Flbers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
111 _ _ 385 _ _ _ _ _ 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (El In Fibers/ mm2
E;;;I
5.1lfibersfmm2
Cale. of Flber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
C Ib====
iberslcm3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE F.~er Llm~ ot Quantit.on (LOO) ~ 7 fibers/mm 2
Flber counts outside the HXH300 fiberSlmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: _M__._M_;.;.o_u_"_t__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - 9/28/20-10 Date: - - - - - 9/28/20-10
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-005
-------------------------- Client Sample ID:
P-02-A
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Litem/Minute (FR)
0.6
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
5
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
3.0
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FlS)
104.5 24
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Tolal Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
."----,,o,,---*100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gralieule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
E:I Cale. of Flber Density (El in Fibers/ mm2 '554.7Im~erslmm2
Notes:
19.5 18.5
17
30
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em' C l!======
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FiHer Umd or Ouant~ion (lOa) = 7 fiberslmm 2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabll~ and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: ,;.;M.;.;.'.;.;.M;.;.ou.;.;n.;..;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 9/2812010
Dale: _ _......;:.9/,;;;2.;;,8/,;;.;20;.;.1.;;.0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 .
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-006
-------------------------- Client Sample ID:
P-02-B
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, LiterslMlnute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
_-- _.._.. 0.....5_8-"........_-
5
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
2.9
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
125.5
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
-*----o------
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
- - - -38-5- - 0.00785
Cale. of Floor Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I
799.4lfioorslmm2
Notes:
20 34 24.5
Cale. of FiOOr Cone.(C) in Fiberslcm'
c 106.1 bers/cm' I!::::.=====~d
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fo"er Ltm~ of Quant~ion (LOO) ~ 7 fillers/mm 2
Filler counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabily and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed 8y:.;.M..;.;...;.;.M;.;.o.;.;un.;.;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - Date:
9/28/2010
- - - - - - Date:
9128/2010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 .
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-007
Client Sample ID:
P-02-C
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
0.61 5
Tolal Sample Volume, Lilers M
3.05
Tolal Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
126 20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counled, Blank(FLB)
.._._,o.,--_.-
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Floor Density (E) In FiOOrsl mm2
E=I
802.51fioors/mm2
Notes:
29.5 29.5
27
17
Cale. of FiOOr Cone.(C) In Fiberslem'
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Finer Limit of Ouantrtian (LOO) ; 7 fibers/mm 2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal variabllrty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _~9/;..;;2.;.;.8/.;;.20;..;1...;;..O
Reviewed By: M. Mount
------------------------
Date: _ _~9;..;;/2.;.;.8/2.;;.O;..;1...;;..O
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 . MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade MAS Sample #:
M51857-008
Client Sample ID:
P-2-D
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Llters/Mlnute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
0 . 6 5 .#>..........- ..._ - -......._ 5
..........
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
3.25
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
118,5
20
o
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF)
Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Flber Density (E) in Flbers/ mm'
E=I
754.81llbersfmm'
Notes:
21
24 22.5
19
Cale. of Flber Cone.(C) in Flbers/em' ibersfcm3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter
Llmil of Ouantttlon (lOa) =7 fibersimm 2
Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed 8y:.;,;M;.;..;.;.M;.;;.0.;;,;un;.;.t___________
-------- Date:
9/28/2010
Date: _ _ _9/_2_8/_20;,..1_0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 .
MAS Project:
Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-009
Client Sample ID: -----------A---2---A----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
9
13 10
13.5 9.5
15
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
----2-.0-4------------_5._-------
10.2
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
210
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Calc. of Flber Density (E) In Fibers/ mm2
E=I"
1337.6Ifioors/mm2
Notes:
50 42 40 41.5
Calc. of Floor Cone.(C) in FiOOrs/cm' Ibersfem1
lb::::::=====~
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fi~er Limit of OuanWon (LOO) ~ 7 fiberslmm 2
Flber counts outside the 1()()'1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal varlabitHy and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Date:
9/28/2010
--..;;.;.;;;..;;..;;.;;.;..;;..
Reviewed By:-M-.-M-o-un-t------------------
- - - - - - - Date:
9128/2010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 .
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-010
Client Sample ID: -----------A---2---B----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate. Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
2.04 5
Total Sample Volume, liters M
10.2
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
192 20
o
,100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385
0.00785
Calc. of Flber Density lE) In Fibersl mm'
E=I
1222.9)fibersfmm2
Notes:
41.5 34 37.5 42
Calc. of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm'
Media Type' 25 rrm MCE mer limn 01 Ouantn,OIl (lOO) = 7 fiberslmm 2 Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabllity and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Reviewed By: M. Mount --~~------------------
Date:- - - - - - 9/28/2010
Date: _ _-.;;..9/;,.;;2;;.;,.8/.;;,.20;.,;1..;..0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 -
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-011
-------------------------- Client Sample ID:
A-2-C
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
2
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
5
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
10
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
200.5 20
o
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
._--38-5--0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm'
E=I
1277. 11frberslmm2
Notes:
42
31
37
41
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
C
lk====
bers/cm3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fitter Limrt of QU<lntHlon (LOO) = 7 fiOOrs/mm 2 FlOOr counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have grea1er than optimal vanabilHy and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By:...;M.;,;...;,;.M;.;;.ou;.;n.;,;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _.-.,,;,,9_/2,,;,.8/_20.;...1_0 Date: _ _.....;;9/:,;:2;;;,8/;:,;20;;..;,1,;;.0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade MAS Sample #:
M51857-012
Client Sample ID:
A-2-0
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, L1ters/Mlnute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
2.16 5
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
10.8
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FlS)
313
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF)
Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) In Flbersl mm2
E=I
1993.Slfibers/mm2
Notes:
71.5 55 62 59.5
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/cm3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Finer
Um~ 01 Quanl~ion (LOO) = 7 fiOOrs/mm 2
Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabilrty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _-=:9;.:/2;:;81.::;20:.;1:.;:.0
Reviewed 8y:..;;M;.;.:..;.;M.:.;:;0.;.;un;.;.:.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _.-..;,9/;.;;2.;,;8/;;.,20;.,;1.;.0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade MAS Sample #:
M51857-013
Client Sample ID:-----------A---2---E----------- Analysis Date: 9/28/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
90
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
900
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
7.5
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (El in Flbersl mm2
E""I
1
9.6lflbersfmm
Notes:
2
o 3 0.5
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(e) in Fibers/cm' C
!k====
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fmer Limff of Ouantrtlon (LOO) = 7 fibers/mm' FIller counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal variabilrty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: M. Mount
~~~------------------
- - - - - - Date:
9/28/2010
Date:- - - - - - 9/2812010
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 -
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-014
Client Sample ID.
FB-2-1
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 10
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 20
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 30
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 40
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 50
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 60
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 70
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 80
0 0
0
0
0
0
oo ~0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 90 0
o 0
0
0
0
0 100
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
o
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
o
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
o
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Flbers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gratlcule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale, of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2 E=I O.Olflbers/mm2
Calc, of Fiber Cone,(C) in Fibers/em'
11 0.0
0 0 0 0 c 0.0 I1
Notes:
MedIa Type 25 mm MCE FIlter Lim~ of Ouantltion (LOO) = 7 flbers/mm 2
Fiber counts outsIde the 100-1300 fibers/mm ' ra"ge have greater than optImal variabIlity and are probably bIased
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Date: _ _....;.9/;,;;2,;;.;8/;;;.20;;.;1~0
Reviewed By: .;,;M;;...;,;M;.;;o;;;.un.;,;,t_____________
Date: _ _ _9/_2_8/_20_1_0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
AC Resin Pipe Cutting, Study 2 .
MAS Project: Electric Saw, Steel Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51857-015
Client Sample ID:
FB-2-2
Analysis Date: 9/28/10
------------------------------
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 10
0
0
20
Pump Flow Rate, Llters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
_. "''''................0.'''_.................
0
>- ....... - - - - - .. - .......... --~-~~--
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
2;0
0
Notes'
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
0
0
90 0 0
0
0
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
- - ..- ........ ...... 2 ... "" - ... .,.,.._ ...1. _00"' ...
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
0
.... ,,-,1_ .. _--,,-
-..,---1-00--,---
. _ - -38-5 - - -
"'--0_.00..7. _85--
Galc. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm'
E=I
2.5lfiberS/mm2
Calc. of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fiberslcm3
c= NA
flbersfcm'
Med'a Type: 25 mm MCE Filter limIt of Quantltlon (LOQ) = 7 nbers/mm' Flber counts outside the 100-1300 f,bers/mm ' range have greater than optimal varr.b.lrty and are probably biased
Analyst: W. 6. Egeland Reviewed By:,;.;M.;....;...M;...;o.;;..un,;.;t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- - - - - - - - Date:
9/28/2010
Date: _ _ _9.;.,/2;..,;8;..,;/2.;.,0_1_0
MAS
CLIENT NAME:
TEM ANALVSIS M51857-005
Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
CLIENT SAMPLE ID:
P-2-A
7402 ANALYSIS
Sample Areal Volume: r
Filter Type:
3
MCE 25mm
Liters
Date Analyzed: I
10/1/2010
Analyst: ~MehrdadMotamedi
Pore size:
0,8
Scope Number:
4
Effective Filter Area:
385
Accelerating Voltage:
100
KV
Sample type:
Air
Indicated Mag:
25
>,~=~._A~'
KX
Analysis type: Grid Acceptance
7402 YES
5 %
Screen Mag:
20
KX
----~
Grid_box:
7809
- - QM_ IiOs Number of grids: 2 If Numbel' of openings: 22
#1:
#3:
#2: 106 #4: ~
Asbestos
Average Grid Size: 0.011556 Total Area Analyzed:
0.254
Non-asbestos
% Asbestos 100
Str#, 2
~qudftlD
E1-F1 F2
hba !yp(' ! ! ~ >,
' .. ,,~>- _ _ .......~,. _ _,~......l \
SIZU
iAn:u()phyl!tfl
,-,--
:CrqcldQ!Jle
36,5
0,5
19
OA
3
I
iCroCldolite
6
04
4
r--IIAnthophyllte
58
0,5
5
L~':> -ll6O!b>9P[1YJ~~~-
8
06
! 6
F3
- 7
!Crocidollle
::A~;h~;;hYhie
9
OA
6_5
0,8
8
9
F4
- - -::;_ ;899fl,91i!~::':",
5,5
03
'i~J9fj9gILt~, ______
6
OA
10
F5
' ICrocidolite
11
0,3
11
12
F6
13
fAnthoptlylite
7
0,6
-".~-'--- - - ,
",(Crocidolll!'l. ~~~'" n _ _' 14
_ Ai'H;npl1ylt>()
14
O,g
14
C>-l;:;ldc.l[c
22,5
0,5
15
: ,GS9cidolile
15
0,8
16
17
F7
-'I'licrocidoi;i';
24
1.5
jA~th~~Ph';~t;' ,~,~"- 8,5
08
18
r~- iAnt>lop-tiyllte
12
1
19
~ AnthophY!lte
B
0,8
20
'Croc!idc!!le
31
08
21
LCrocieJolile
14
0,7
22
~~C1QC!dohJc"
20
05
23
I'Crgydol,te
8
04
24
,Anthophyli!e
12
1,5
25
F8
l(\,ry!IJ9Phylit(L
6
26
JCro~ldolite,
13
27
F9
[C[Qyldol le
6
04
28
CroCl(;ol te
28
2
Morpll
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole ArnphlbOle Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbolc Amphlbole
Si\ED
Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphlbole
29
NSD G10
30
G9
31
32
G8
33
34
35
G7
36
37
38
39
40
41
G6
42
43
G5
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
G4
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59 E2-14
60
61
62
63
64
15
65
66
67
68
69
70
16
71
72
73 74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
7
0.8
Amphibole
Amphibole
42
0.5
Amphibole
AmphiboJe
16
3
Amphibole
Amphibole
9
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
5.8
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
6.5
0.9
Amphibole
Amphibole
9
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
8
1
Amphibole
Amphibole
11
1.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
6
0.8
Amphibole
Amphibole
6.5
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
7
0.3
Amphlbole
Amphibole
6.6
0.4
8
OA
Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole
20
2
Amphibole
Amphibole
23
0.7
Amphibole
Amphibole
5.7
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
58
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
5.8
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
6
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
11.5
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
7
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
"/1
28
0.7
Amphibole
Amphibole
12
Amphibole
Amphibole
12
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
12
1
Amphibole
Amphibole
18
0.9
Amphibole
Amphibole
175
0.7
Amphibole
Amphibole
7
0.7
Amphibole
Amphibole
9
0.9
Amphibole
Amphibole
8
0.4
Amphlbole
Amphibole
16
0.5
Amphlbole
Amphibole
9
0.8
Amphlbole
Amphibole
9
0.6
Amphibole
Amphibole
10
1.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
8
1.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
12
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
12
1
Amphibole
Amphibole
6
0.9
Amphibole
Amphibole
8
Amphibole
Amphibole
11
0.4
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
36
3
Amphibole
Amphibole
16
2
Amphibole
Amphlbole
12
1.5
Amphibole
Amphlbole
10
AmphlbOJe
AmphibOle
6
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
24.5
0.9
Amphibole
Amphibole
10
0.6
Amphibole
Amphibole
7
0.9
Amphibole
Amphlbole
7
1.5
Amphibole
Amphlbole
9.8
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
5.8
0.8
Amphibole
Amphibole
8.5
0.4
Amphlbole
Amphibole
82
L...J!AnlhophyHte
10
0.6
Amphibole Amphibole
J 83 17 L~J!Q~QS:istO!!!lL~"_m"'~ 12 0.8
Amphibole Amphibole
84
13
1~lcroclqQlite .,"-" '"' .1 24
0.34
Amphibole Amphlbole
~
L... 85
,m J~ro~idolile .~~ .. J 10
0.6
Amphibole Amphibole
,WlI
C 86
19
.. UA~!~,9Pl)Ylit~=--:=J 7,5 04
Amphibole Amphibole
:t-i;
1 87 C\!Antl}QpbY!i!~_ _m 6 0.5 Amphibole Amphibole
r I 88
![;rocidoii.-e--~'
6
0.5
Amphibole Amphibole
I 89
[ lK;LQcid~olile.,
14
O.B
Amphibole Amphibole
.fiJ
90
[ IIAnthoPh1:lite-=--~..J 7.6 0.4
Amphibole Amphibole
91
!.=~JlCr9.f!.~;;lii~:,.,~_=:J 6
0.4
Amphibole Amphibole
l 92
[ J!CrOc;kl.911IL. ___ 12,5 0.4
Amphlbole Amphlbole
93
12
0.8
Amphibole Amphibole
f{l{,
94
.. (Cr9~i90Iile ,.
8
2
Amphibole Amphibole
}5]
95
I
IiAnlhQllh't1i1e
6.3
0.5
Amphibole Amphibole
..0~
""..JJ 96
97
c!--il!lQ~!rlOt~Copi'diloYJi!lllLe_ . _. _]
7 22
0,3 1.5
Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole
I 98 C~::UCrocl99Ij!g ,mm ,_"~",, 35 0.7 Amphibole Amphibole
99
[, .." HAD!hophylite
] 15
2
Amphibole Amphibole
,.d.
L I 100
"",.JIADJI]J?WyJite
8
Amphibole Amphibole
:;7l
101
I 'l!Antllopli~,:==:J 7.5
0.4
Amphibole Amphibole
~,>,d
#GridOp 22
M51857 005 Sllll1ple Comlnents: !po~l>nal rl$lllt
10.210
i).OOO
o.QO<>
o
.5,12Q .
l\-R.V EMI~V (r.v)
1$.120 X-R.y ~"OT9Y (V.~V)
Mg
3.940
:;.\20 )(-I1>y t '9V (KW)
3.$40
5,120 < X-R.y f:".,qy (I(.V)
iO.240
Si
(MOO
3.1}40
5.120 X-R,y ""9Y (t:.V)
SECTION 6
MAS, LLC. PROJECT COC
MASID:
M51863
Client Name: Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
Project Name: ECl AC Resin Pipe Cutting Electric Saw
logged By: -d-dm-o-u-n-t---------------------
TRANSPORT INFORMATION:
Client Job No: Client PO:
Date In:
Client Code:
9128/2010 MASCORP
Submitted By: Michael Mount, CIH
Delivery By: Received By:
Condition:
Hand Delivery -N-an-c-y-S-e-ar-s~-----------------
-go-o~d----------------------~-------------------------
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Documents: COC CommentsfurCOC: _______________
Contact:
Bill Longo
Title: First Name: Last Name:
Mr. William
Longo
Suffix
Work Phone: (770) 866-3200 Ext:
- - - Other Phone:
Ext:
---------- - - - Fax: (770) 866-3259
#
Client ID
000
lab blank
001
A-03-A
002
A-03-B
003
A-03-C
004
A-03-D
005
P-3-A
006
P-3-B
007
P-3-C
008
P-3-D
009
A-3-A
010
A-3-B
011
A-3-C
012
A-3-D
013
A-3-E
014
FB-3-1
015
FB-3-2
RECEIVED BY:
SAMPLE INFORMATION:
Volume
#
0 540 100 540 500 2.4 2.32 2.44 2.64 8.16 8.24 8.2 7.52 900 0 0
Client ID
SIGNATURES
Volume
f"\\ 5\ DV~
INDUSTRIAL hI GIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY
MAS. ~.~. ~,#-!/I\
COMPANY NAME Illtts. 1. J..G j Pep t 1'1
ADDRESS:
3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259
PHONE: FAX:
page-L of J
.z';1.. C Ffrl
lHbo~
(p{.Lf/)h fat
PROJECT NAME:
WORKAREADESCRIPT10l'f PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE:
mi}Ze
SAMPLING DATE: er /';l? 11ft)
v l>tu4y J -
rn~
ca('hrd~
811'K.
DATE
Iq!2-,
lI -I
I..-
TURNAROUND TIMES:
_ _ _ 1 DAY
SAMPLE NUMBER
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE MEDIA
In IA-OJ"a IRJ\.cJ.<'<lf-QuuJ. NE
131' 01
,$6
{/ Gn II J/
SVJ
J\J/D
Jp. :; ...,.4 IJ?t!.r.:>c~ J ,t>/'J tUc/lk(;., R
Il "
f
7
(
I l
<.1
~
~/ 0 I 'J/
V7
L
lA' 3 - A: t~ J ~ u~Vij$i~N.
11 [3. I
C.I
.~t:
;w
01--'--
/ JJUJ
JJ ~! \j;-Otl+s; irf;~ l?fJ.
I~To.,.]..J::--:1Ir'F1...'i..Fi.Tri-_=-.tnJfJivK
{Y\6 1glOq
~ t.u\I. fila-
..v
v- fi:"tl~?=1 IF'ft nf\;<. 5)... '.Ii'"'' 1Y~t:oP t:...r~bl) ic.
1 ~T ~r
~.-A: ~>rtrf\J D
_ _ _ 3 DAYS
_ _ _ STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS
I I ANALYSIS DESIRED
START
STOP
I
TOTAL TIME
PRE FLOW
POST FLOW
AVG. FLOW
Total Volume
TIME
TIME
MINUTES RATE RATE RATE
Llters
LPM
LPM
LPM
.r;O Ill.f CO , -; 'fO)..J 1,: 5.<"; I J: 40,~ I
liQ,O I".?J rio~g' I S'"'f ()
[~
J
I ;t.0 I ~.o I :J..D I 100
VI---Jj-I-\17
/0.0 I Il,lP I ((){gj S'tit[) I/o. 1I 9.'1 110, () I S"DO
. 7.!tfL-;;"'L~OLf 14. 'l)r(l--~
tt~J-;J.:31 ,/~O I Z,4-f)
7 '-107).
,1t241~C~1.~~ rAr3~
~ 0 I .16 'l.1 ,bt T~tJq.
iD ~ I ,~~ /,("t.: J~~
200~
i.o/' 12,{)2r;Z;lClfl-~~7'"
f~
:2, o~I~. D.zr.:i,&'..IR,2..~
r.2.. :1. () f I ~.~ I 2. c~!....
Jt
.J,;mT-J,; I J83 I I, 8") II, RSl 1J'~7~f.i
$;6)~S-T i.f.-~) I qll-'Io.t?l /().t? I /() ~m
.......r- ~7@~L ___ A
.:/f"---Y--17I- 0
r- ~ ~Cf6~~ 1/"""",../ I-m y
<0 m -
. A A 0/1 ::;:::p' ~
~1~17VI7
,v __ CHAIN OF CUSTODY First Transfer by: Second Transfer by:
Third Transfer by: .
NAME
N~ AJ:."
CO)'PANY
17~ ./7ll/l:f tL.C
0rRl' MODE
TRANSFE
Mt- ./ (
LOG IN DATE RECEIVED BY
9 -'d'6 -['0
I( p-~o--1S
I
~
COMPANY
fY'-1'"'- ~
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-001
Client Sample ID: ------------A---0-3---A------------ Analysis Date: 9/29/10
o o o o o
-_ _--_ Pump Flow Rate, LitersJMinute (FR)
......... 10.8 ..
10
Sample Time, Minutes IT)
50
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
540
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
12.5
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FC8) Total Fields Counted, 8Iank(FLB)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area. M~ (GFA)
o _ _ _ 011_"* _ _ _ _ _
...._,-,1-0-0"""-,-
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I ! .' .'. :fS:91fibersJmml
4
2.5
2
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
C I.!=====
iberstem3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Finer
limrt of Quantrtlon (LOO) ~ 7 fibers/mm 2
F,ber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than opllmal variablhty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. 8. Egeland Reviewed By: ,.;.;M;.;.,.,.;.;M;,.;;o,;;.un,.;.;I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _ _9_1_29_/2_0_1_0 Date: _ _ _1...;0.;../4;../2.;.;0..1._0
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M518635-002
Client Sample ID:
A-03-B
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
--------------------------------------------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time. Minutes (T)
Total Sample Volume, Uters M
------_.._2 ---...--
-_.._----5-0---------
100
Total FiOOrs Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
1.0
100
- ------o--_.... 100
Area of Filler, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of FiOOr Density (El in Fibersl mml
=I :,; ..' E
;;<,;1 ~31fibers/mm2
A
q;/a
o
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in FlOOrs/em'
Media Type. 25 rml MCe Finer
limd of Quant~ion (LOO) =7 fibers/mm 2
Fiber counts outside the 1()()'1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabllrty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: .:.,;M.;,;.';.;.M;.;;.o;;,;un;.;.t_________________
Date: ______~9/;.;;;2.:.;9/.:;.20:...;1..:..0 Date: _______1.;,.01.4./._20_1_0
Materials Analytical Services
Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-003
Client Sample ID:-----------A---0-3--C----------- Analysis Date: 9/29/10
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
___ ----10-.8_.. ....
--_.....-_..5._0...... ..
540
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted, BlanK (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank{FLB)
-_ ..... 1...5-.5..---
_ _ -_ ... ...100.... ..
. , , . , - , _0# . - , - , .
.,---1-0-0 --,-
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gratieule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385
iIj . . . . . . . . . . . - - . . . _ -
. - _0...0.. 0-7-85- -
Cale. of FiOOr Density (E) In FiOOrsl mm2
E=I ~ .
i';~1~k1lfibers/mm2
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
C'"I l = = = =
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FI~er
Llmn of Quantnion (lOO) =7 fibers/mm 2
Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Date: _ _.....;;.9;.,;;;/2.;".9/,;;,,20;.,;1.;;.,0
Reviewed By: .;".M;;,..;.;;M.;".ou:;;.n;.;;t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 10/4/2010
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-004
Client Sample ID:
A-03-0
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
-------------------------------------------
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pump Flow Rate, Uters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
-_ ___--_-- ----_.. 10 - ......... ... 50... .....-""... 500
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
8.5
100
o
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385
- - -0.-00-78-5- -
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I,\
, ':1,O:alfiberslmm2
o
1.5
2
3
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) In Fiberslem'
Media Type' 25 mm MCE Fi~ef
lim~ of Quant~ion (LOO) = 7 flbers/mm 2
Flber counts outside the l00-l300fibersimm 2 range have greater than opUmal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed 8y:_M.;;..;;.M;.;.o.;;;.;un;.;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _....;9;;;/2;;;;9/.:.20:...:1~O Date: _ _--.:1..:;O/...;;4/..:;20:...:1~O
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis~NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-005
Client Sample ID: -----------P---3---A----------- Analysis Date: 9/29/10
Pump Flow Rate, lIters/Minute (FR)
0.6
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
4
Tolal Sample Volume, lilers (V)
2.4
Total FiOOrs Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100 23
Tolal Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank{FLB)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M~ (GFA)
o W"_,~,_~_._
. . - - - - 1*0-0- - - * -
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (c) in FiOOrs/ mm2 E=t;S53.9Ifioors/mm2
Notes:
21 23.5 25 19
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/cm'
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Flker
LImR of QuantnlOll (LOO) =7 fibers/mm 2
Flber counts outside the 100-1300 fibernlmm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabilRy and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Reviewed 8y:.;.;M..;.;..;.;.M.;;,o.;;;.;un.;.;.t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Dale:- - - - - - 9/29/2010
Date: _ _.....;.1_0/_4/_20,;...1_0
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
MS1863-006
Client Sample ID:
P-3-B
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
------------------------------
7
7
6 5.5 3
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
-_ _ ........_0""._5.8 ..._-.., 4
Total Sample Volume, Uters M
2.3
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted. Samples (FLS)
Total Fibers Counted. Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted. Blank(FLB)
Area of Filter. mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
130.5 20
o
100
- - - -38-5- - -
0.00785
Cale. of Flber Density (El in Fibers/ mm' E=I ,. ,'.) 831..2lfibers/mm'
Notes:
27.5 30.5 24.5 27
Calc. of Fiber Conc.(e) In Fibers/cm'
C 1'=====
bers/cml
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fi~er Limit of Quantition (LOO) = 7 fiberslmm 2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: _M_.;..M..;,o.;..un.;..t______________
Date:
9129/2010
--...;.;.;;;.;.;.;;.;;.;..;..
- - - - - - - Date:
10/4/2010
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-007
Client Sample ID:
P-3-C
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
------------------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
Sample Time, Minutes IT)
0.61 4
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
2.44
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
148
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
_.----o----30
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gratieule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mmz
E=I
942.7lfiberslmm1
Notes:
31 25.5 26.5 40.5
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) In Flbers/em'
C=
Ibers/em'
t!::=====dJ
Media Type: 25 nm MCE FiKer Limd of Quantnion (LOO) ~ 7 fibers/mm 2
Flber counts outside the 1()(J..1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabimy and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Reviewed By: M. Mount
-------------.-----------------
- - - - - - - Date:
9/29/2010
Date:- - - - - - 10/412010
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-008
Client Sample ID: ------------P---3--0------------ Analysis Date: 9/29/10
o
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) .. _._. _0.-6-6--'*..
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
4
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
2.64
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FlS)
102
36
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FlB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gra!icule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers( mm2
E=I
360;9lfloorsrmmi
Notes.
22 14 30 23
Cale, of Fiber Cone.(e) in Fibers(em' bersfcm3
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Finer Limit of Ouantnlon (LOO) = 7 fiberslmm 2 Fiber counts outside tI1e 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range ha~e greater than optimal ~ariabilily and are probably biased
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _-.;;9;,;;/2;;;;;912.::.0;;.;1~O
Reviewed By:.;;M;;;..,;.:M.;.;;o.:;un,;.:t_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _--.,;1.:;O/..;;412.;;;.0,;;,;1~O
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-009
Client Sample ID:
A-3-A
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
----------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
_ ...._..,... .._2.,....0_4---_..-
4
Total Sample Volume, Li!ers M
8.16
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
274.5
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Tolal Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gralicule Field Area, M~ (GFA)
385 0.00785
Gale. of Fiber Density (E) In Fibersl mm1
E=I,~ ,... 1 ';:1,748.4lfibers/mm2
Notes:
56 63.5 50 48
Gale. of Fiber Gone.(C) In Fibers/em' CI'======
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FIHer Llmn of Quant~lon (LOO) ~ 7 fibers/mm 2 Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal variabil~y and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _~9..;;f2.;.9.1.2.0...1_0
Reviewed By:.;.;M.....M....o..u..n..t.______________
Date: _ _ _1_0/_4/_20_1_0
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-010
Client Sample ID:
A-3-B
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
---------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, LitersfMinute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
2.06 4
Total Sample Volume. Liters M
8.24
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
206.5 20
Total Fibers Counted. Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M~ (GFA)
385 0.00785
Cale. of Flber Density (E) In Fibersl mm2
E=ll::i;<;> .1'315.31f1bers/mm2
Notes:
38 37 30 49
Cale. of Flber Cone.(e) in Fibers/em'
Media Type: 25 mm MCE Fmer Limij of Ouanmion (LOO) ~ 7 fiberslmm 2
Flber counts outSIde the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal vanablllty and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: ,.;;M;,;.;.,..;.;M,;.;;o.,;;;u;,;.;nt:..-____________
Date: _ _ _9;;;,/:;,29;;;,/2:;,0;.,;1..;;.0 Date: _ _ _,.;.;10;,;./4,.;.1;;,.20;.,;1...;.,0
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
MS1863-011
Client Sample ID:
A-3-C
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Llters/Minute (FR)
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
2.05 4
Total Sample Volume, Liters (V)
8.2
Total Fibers Counted. Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
302
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF)
Graticule Field Area. M~ (GFA)
_ _ _ 385 """"'Iil _ _ _ _ __ 0.00785 """""'*iwIrIw _ _ _ _
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) In FibersJ mm2
E=I. ,}]:,;~:1~2:f3lfibers/mm2
Notes:
60.5
71
68 54.5
Cale. of Fioor Cone.(C) in Fibers/em' C
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FIHer Lim~ of OuanlitJOn (LOO) ~ 7 fiberslmm 2
Fiber counts outside the 1()()'1300 fibersJmm 2 range have greater than optimal variability and are probably biased,
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Reviewed By:-M-. -M-o-un-t------------------
----.:.--- Date:
9/29/2010
Date:
10/4/2010
---.;..;.;......;..~
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-012
Client Sample ID:
A-3-D
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, LitersiMinute (FR) Sample Time, Minutes (T)
1.88 4
Total Sample Volume, Lilers M
7.52
Tolal Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
251.5
20
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FeB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
o
100
_-_.. 3.8...5_-0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibers/ mm2
E=I1601~9Ifibers/mm2
Notes:
57.5 49.5
57
39
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
82.0 fibersfcm)
1!=:======lI
Media Type- 25 mm MCE Finer
Urnft of Quantftion (LOO) =7 fiberslmm 2
Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than Op1unal variability and are probably biased.
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By:.;.M..;...;.M;.;.o.;..un-..t___________
Date: _ _--.;9;.../2.;;.;9/.;.;.20.;..;1..;.0
Date:- - - - - - 10/4/2010
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
MAS ProJect:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 ~ Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-013
Client Sample ID: -----------A---3---E----------- Analysis Date: 9/29/10
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
10
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
90
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
900
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
10
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
____38_5_ Wllllt_ 0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm2
E=I': ,,'12:7Ifibers/mm2
3
3.5
2
Notes:
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) in Fibers/em'
c=l l = = = = =
Me<lla Type: 25 mm MCE Finer Limit of Ouant~ion (LOO) = 7 floors/mm 2 Flber coums outside the 100-1300 flbers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal variabil~ and are probably blase<!.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Reviewed By: .;.;M.;..;..:.;M.;.;:o..;;.u;.;.;nt;....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:- - - - - - 9/29/2010
Date: _ _ _1...;0_/4_/2_0_1_o
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, peM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-014
Client Sample ID;
FB-3-1
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
--------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, LiterstMinute (FR)
o
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
o
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
o
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FeB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
o
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gratieule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
----38-5--0.00785
Cale. of Fiber Density (E) in Fibersl mm~
E=I<\'
J, " 7:0lfiberstmml
Notes:
o o o o
Cale. of Fiber Cone.(C) In Fibers/em'
c", NA
lberslem3
I!::=====:::!J
Media Type. 2S mm MCE Fi~er Lim~ of QuantrtlOO (Loa) : 7 firers/mm 2
FIbet' counts outside the 100-1300 fiberslmm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabilrty and are probably biased
Analyst: W. B. Egeland Reviewed By: ,.;.;M';';".;.;M.;.;;o..;..u;.;.;nt~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date:
9/29/2010
--.....;.--.;....-;..-
---.;.;...-- Date:
10/4/2010
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-015
Client Sample ID:
FB-3-2
Analysis Date: 9/29/10
----------------------------------
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Minute (FR)
o
10
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
o
Total Sample Volume, Liters M
o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS) Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
Total Flbers Counted, Blank (FCB) Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Graticule Field Area, M~ (GFA)
o
100
o
100
385 0.00785
Calc. of Fiber Density (E) In Flbersl mm'
E=I<
:" 7~Olfibers/mm2
Notes:
o o o o
Calc. of Fiber Conc.(C) in Fibers/cm>
c=~ NA
Medoa Type: 25 mm MCE Fi~er
Um~ of Quantrtion (LOO) = 7 fiberslmm 2
Fiber counts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optimal vanabil~ and are probably biased.
Analyst: w. B. Egeland
Date: _ _ _9::.;,/:;,;29;,;./2:;,;0;,.:1,;;.0
Reviewed By: .;.,M;.;"..,.;.M.;..;o;.;".u,.;.nt;,...-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _ _..:.:10::;,./4,;:,/2:;,;0:...:1,;;.0
Materials Analytical Services Airborne Fiber Analysis-NIOSH 7400 Issue 2, PCM
MAS Project:
AC Resin Pipe Cutting Study 3 Electric Saw, Carbide Blade
MAS Sample #:
M51863-
Client Sample ID: ------------------------------ Analysis Date:
Pump Flow Rate, Liters/Mlnute (FR)
o
Sample Time, Minutes (T)
o
Total Sample Volume, Uters M
o
Total Fibers Counted, Sample (FCS)
o
Total Fields Counted, Samples (FLS)
100
Total Fibers Counted, Blank (FCB)
o
Total Fields Counted, Blank(FLB)
100
Area of Filter, mm2 (AF) Gratieule Field Area, MM2 (GFA)
.---..3.8.5.,--0.00785
' . Cale. of FiOOr Density (El In Fibersl mm2
E~I<
.7 .Olfioors/mml
Notes:
o o o o
Cale. of FiOOr Cone.(e) in Fibers/cm'
C <: #DIVlO!
Media Type: 25 mm MCE FI~er
Limrt of Quantrtion (LOO) =7 fiOOrs/mm 2
Flber courrts outside the 100-1300 fibers/mm 2 range have greater than optImal variability and are probably biased
Analyst: W. B. Egeland
Date: _ _ _ _ __
Reviewed By:.;;M;.;..;.;.;M;;.;;o;.;;u;.;;nt;...._ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date: _ _ _ _ ___
f<' 5'\ C3b3
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY
page-L of
;, CFJ)1 ( 1pbP ~
(p(,LfI);G tlf
.'.....~:~MAS" ~'j$!#o
COMPANY NAME /lilts; LI-{" I f)ep t 14
ADDRESS:
3945 Lakefield Court
Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259
PHONE:
FAX:
PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE: 111 {
SAr,t~L~NG ~~E: <r/"'/;rtJ
TURNAROUND TIMES:
_ _ _ 1 DAY
_ _ _ 3 DAYS
___ STANDARD 5 -1 DAYS
'DA~E
14/:n
L".
~({ll ~l.U'Y mrJi. 3"~.C: SAMPL~~-------------------r~S~AM~?~LE~~----------r---~----~-=TO~TA-L~IP~R~Elnp~O~ST~~~~G~.~-=TQ~~~I--
NUMBER
SAMPLE LOCATION
MEDIA
ANALYSIS DESIRED
START TIME
STOP TIME
TIME MINUTES
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
Volume Llters
IA-C:::r-tBI-
VMU_A,J ~IVGrE
(SW)
'li' n
4/rutD
1(1e.(I$D~ 7Cf()~ 4;~ #~~ ; '/ ~~. rP-:;- 'Jh
1.,,t)Ill IdD/lKeJ..
R
l
~
~
~/ 0
,.,1,;
\/
_ I
'A.~-l- ~~/t> Jlt5J\~ ur {o~ ,~tt 'I.D f.l.. r-3
'''' V /' '/ :Ms~E
c,
i, W
n V
1J(J]
~ ~ 7.~)" ~ ~ l?e rz I~~"'l I~,'",,'''/ ~fDf) -~ "j /tt' ,,/btl~;.4 .p ~l.
.. I
1:?JIl-IIlK
I
J, J/
-1/1 11,
r'0 c;S t,P., (0'-)
It~hl"i<- ~ Ii::AfY"J-
Sk. i""''';- t'?-e.fopt:,.. r::,.h/l ic.
+ ~I ~ V
n. p::.-re:i\ V
_
I-.
l'7liO, O J
I
!
j
J,
-]I,.tf{(t)/:b>.. l'S,".~C::;-
0
LPM l(),Q
IILSPM7ItJL.P9M!
S't'O
d..0 !L,O ;;,,0 10D
10.0 II.~ /O,-g S"i.!tD
7 'Yo~"
1
.. ,\.
,/" '"f
- ,l~ 0
'-fn.r:{
CA
-/~ 'l.
Jf}. C
J,,{} ,~
I bI
$"'1)0 2..-u.:ij' ..... '3/_
,-:till
7t//;O~')-,
.;Z D~ 116'2. ~.,ulD.tXfr.:btt ( ~, 2..N. R,:z..'4
7.
;( I DC t.-i5~
C;{
~.d:>;t .1 O~
...
2[2-
'/
-V
l- l,q"? I, tJ 1 "~7
7f.j.O';).
4-.}S' q/) fat) IO.t? d>
1
/ ' ..... '-" __
........ I' / V v . /
0 l
.-'
({)
. / /'" /" 1/ .,/ . /
./
/'"
,.,.,
l
-- .. -.--~_ ... ~ .......--.~ _ _ _- i - - _ - I - _ - J - . _ - - - L_ _~__ ... .
First Transfer b ;
Second Transfer b : Third Transfer by:
o--iS
COMPANY
fV'
- - - - - - - - - - - - .. ------
f<' 5\ <3 C:,3
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AIR SAMPLING CHAIN OF CUSTODY
:MAS ~.\..
oil>
~~~
COMPANY NAME tll/ts" Lt.." I {Jep t 14
ADDRESS:
PROJECT NUMBER:
f of
Page--L...
3945 Lakefield Court Suwanee, GA 30024 Phone: 770-866-3200 Fax: 770-866-3259
PHONE: FAX: TURNAROUND TIMES;
___ 1 DAY
PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE:
SAMPLING DATE: Cf 17111h
_ _ _ 3 DAYS
_ _ _ STANDARD 5 -7 DAYS
l :Ffrl
( 1(;'i1!1,>'10 hF" KIf b
DATE
it//;n
1/
SAMPLE NUMBER.
SAMPLE LOCATION
..sG n [It-Oj-a. I[{1\.t"(.(,d "'-OlJ\,AJeL
13
~
-(
Id'; .$ Vl
'1I
N/'
fU/D
[P4 ,;-.4- I17e.().;S ,IIK1 I ./;)111 IdDJIkPt. R
lJ
J
t
("
({
a ~ / 0
,:,;
A.~-3-
n.~"'/.9
A
\V
L
An" ~.A:la.. / ut-AlE:.
'"'-
f
'/?;i
("
~w
()
,1/
JJf1)
'J :s ~IJ It:'
Ollt'S rd."i".
11!~-3- I ,~"",; 1..1 1? }.4IVi<
j~ J.., ~ ~l\
tJl
rn ifS (,pLI
1i::.Q1Y1- I r:'/rhi"i<... S~;v--..,.-
;}./ + jl ~
~r:l
G'c.fopt:-.
A. p:.--r~A
--J
SAMPLE MEDIA
8u.w.m~
..Iv
1=A-h/l ,"c.
U
ANALYSIS DESIRED
1'140I 0-,
]i.f();i.
'7~
7'fO~
l'iO?.
'7t/;<)'ih
-,&i.Oi.. I
'?~;;.. ~ -, URI)'
START TIME
l;~~
~V
4: ')4
.. I
'$ :bS'
../'" ---
STOP TIME
l:\..'~
TOTAL TIME MINUTES
.~C
'\J'r
/
#.~~ L
s- ./
I.f~;'
:,
I--qK} ___
I-
./
~ ./"'"
PR!: FLOW R.ATE LPM
iD. 0
~.O
10.t>
..G")0.1
.it! \of
.~ 0
.~g
~.D(;
;/.,0
;<.f)x
lR"<
laf)
l..-
1/
POST FLOW RATE LPM
If.n
a.. 0
11. (p <i.q
In
..c-)...
:ID "l-
I It <f
2. e'2
1~,C2
.2.,92.
" 'If') /().o V
AVG. FLOW RATE LPM
I/~.~
i1..D
1~lg
LD.e .;,,0
,Sf?
IbJ
./A/_
A,/rl\f 2."<')'
l e r-'
1'2()
/()
./
v
,/
./
./ ./ ../
.~
/'
V
......... -
. /V
.-/'
./
._._.-
Total Volume Liters
S-'f(j
lOO
,i)(jt()
5'DO 2...1.J../) ;.. 3"
1,. 2.1/.4 l
2..~
(j .11 b
9,.2..4 i.2..
~.':J:#:' 7.".2.
quo
l-:>
<0
- CHAIN OF CUSTODY
NAME
COJlPANY
MODE 0;10/' LOG IN DATE TRANSFE
RECEIVED BY
COMPANY
~
First Transfer by; FV_ J~/. ~
1.L.. :./$ $ U.&
-;r:z.j ./
.-
q-d~ to
1{~o-lS
~
fY".-M- --::>
Second Transfer by:
.
. Ihird_IrcmsfE;lrJ:>y:
MAS
CLIENT NAME:
TEM ANALYSIS MS1863-00S
Materials Analytical Services Atlanta
CLIENT SAMPLE ID;
7402 ANALYSIS Sample AreaJ Volume:
L __ -.= Filter Type:
.2.4
MCE25mm
Liters
Pore size:
0.8
Effective Filter Area:
3B5
Sample type:
Air
Analysis type: Grid Acceptance
7402
5 %
Date Analyzed: Analyst:
Scope Number:
10/112010
A.Keelo;;
2---"~
Accelerating Voltage:
100
KV
..- !--~---.,~-~-.'-
Indicated Mag:
KX
Screen Mag:
20
KX
I----~~---
Grid_box:
7710
OI: Number of grids: ~
Number of openings: Average Grid Size: 0.012100
#l:~ #3:~ #2:~ #4:~
Total Area Analyzed: L.. O.16~....
Asbestos Non-asbestos
l ,
Str#: 1 2 3 4 5
" fijO
~~._"N~'~
"
~ SquarelD.
FiberType'
A5-A2
lite
[~II\rlJh9Rhyll\~.,~. ]
I
IICrocidolite
I
~Anthophylite
I
.]
c=JIAllthoPtwiile-- m
~iliQM
'~ ,
Size
16.2
1.1
21.4
0.6
8.7
0.6
13.5
0.5
14.8
0.4
Oi"ifF
Morph: Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
SAEO'
Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
6
IAnthophylltc
I 6.5
0.6
7
A3
~ll\nthophy-hte--'1 7.2
1.1
J 8
c=J[ArlihoPhyl~.] 14
2
9
r=:JiAnthOllhyjllL_'___ 7.1
Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole
10
I
IIAnthophylite
I 9
1.2
Amphibole
Amphlbole
I 11
IIIAnthophylite
I 13
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
12
'![groCidol.ll!l
:] 5.B
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
13
_~ Anthoph'l'litc
I 14
1.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
14
'~AnthophylJtc-
I 14.1
0.4
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
15 810 L~J!~nt~()p.hvlite
I 6.2
O.B
16
c=J!AnlhOI!.IJY~l'?._ ..___.1 8.5
0.5
Amphibole Amphlbole
Amphibole Amphibole
,,>'
, ..
,
17
!
i!CroCidohte
I 7
045
18
l~'-' I;Anthoptl.jjjle
I 8
0.5
J 19
il~na!1.lQQIi!!L_~",,, 12.1 0.3
r'" ,",.... ",. "._....... .. L 20
. I!Af)\IJOP.hyQI?, __._~J 14
0.5
~
21
;iCrocldolile
L_ 22
D2
J IGJ().(;I.c!qiile
23
L~= l:[lQ!b,,9~l}yhie .
! 7.1
0.4
8.5
0.3
225
04
Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole
Amphibole Amphlbole Amphlbole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole Amphibole
24
!
IIAnthophylJte
5.1
0.6
Amphibole
Amphlbole
25
r=-.-J:CrOCigOllt!'L.........
17.1
0,8
Amphibole
Amphibole
26
[~ "1!AnthoQ;!ite__~,
18
2
AmphiboJe
Amphibole
27
~Antll0pj1yliie
67
0.4
Amphibole
AmphlboJe
28
~ --lCroc-;ctolite
23.1
1.5
Amphibole
Amphlbole
L--- 29
,AnthoQhl::lite
10.2
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
J 30
r-:J!8!t\b9Pi!Y!i!~.'.m .. _~'
9
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
fYl
. 31
c=JlAnthop):Iy!i!Lm . ~l 68
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
r:::::J 32
[gro,<;jQplite oom
1 11.3
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
r J 33
[m..JI.t)nthoPDYlitEil .. ......001 8.5
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
34
1~.hyJlle~.m .. 5.8 0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
35
[m'_O: mm:j: \!J 1!h~ppm~Yllh-'.L.....0..0_ '.1.. 15.5
2.2
Amphibole
Amphlbole
36
L_~fAn\h9phYli!'L.. mm,mm_J 20.B 0.6
Amphibole
Amphlbole
37
c=J!t.nthoPDYJ.!t._ _ _ j 13
2
Amphibole
Amphlbole
.1 38
[:=:::JfAnth9R6Ylit~=.....
13.5
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
L I 39
JICrocidolite
13.3
0.6
Amphibole
Amphibole
40
D4
c=JlAnthophylite mm
J 7
0.6
Amphibole
Amphibole
Ivl
[ 41
I~I~~Ule .~ .00.-1 10.1 0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
42
c:JICrOcidOll1Loom~m_~ 85.5 2
Amphibole
Amphibole
r- 43
J 48.6
2
Amphibole
Amphibole
44
7
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
45
c:J~9f<idollt~=~~=~ 13.5 0,5
Amphibole
Amphibole
.....<1 46
C __J~9~ldoiiie'~
185
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
hOil
1 47
G2 c=JICrocidolite
22.5
2.7
Amphibole
Amphibole
L-.. - =:Jl t-ll 48
c=JlGrQf19.9illlt_ _
10.2
0.3
49
m_J~L9g2iitEl~ m '] 5.1
0.4
- 50
!~!Crocidollie-mm. . .m
31.8
0.3
~-~--
-,---~--
51
Gl0
.m_J 23
1.5
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphlbole
Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole Amphibole
I 52
17 1
0.3
Amphlbole
Amphibole
I:J
53
[ __.I!9!Pi.~Q]lj~::.m m~ ...::] 35.1
0.5
Amphibole
Amphlbole
l 54
l::::::JfjGiihQPlJyllte" ............ 55
0.6
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
Ll
J 55
c:JICrocidollte
17.3
2
Amphibole
Amphibole
56
C=~][<~r.O.CJq9I1t~.
] 35.1
0.6
Amphibole
Amphibole
.... .. 57
L]I6DihQP,h~ ~ J 9
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
58
c=JICrocidolite .......... m] 11.B
06
Amphlbole
Amphibole
.i 59 A6-A3 [ ][6,(1!hophYi;te m.
16.3
1.5
Amphlbole
Amphibole
60
[mm ....J[pLQ..~.oi;te--~ m'l 9
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
:"1
.........J 61
[ l[groCidollt~
5.3
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
'j
62
r"mm'l[Anihop!lyliie
J 11 8
0.4
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
I 63
C:.. I 64
A4
IIAnthoPhyllte'
6.7
0.3
.JI~.6jhQPhvte" . "j 9
0.3
Amphlbole Amphibole
Amphibole Amphibole
I J1.1I 1"1 65
[""llM1!Qphyiite __ 7
0.4
Amphibole
Amphibole
66
IlAnthoPh'lli!~.._ .. -
5.8
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
67
C3 [=~!Anth~QPl)Yl!1.mL~ . 9
0.4
Amphlbole
Amphibole
: J
68
h 1"~_"~~'~lcr~A,nthoP 'i.I.mI\e- .
13.5
1.1
Amphibole
Amphlbole
69
L~]lcrpi&ql;te
13
18
Amphibole
Amphibole
70
[ WW]!.gmr"idoQtfl
WOO
51
0.3
Amphlbole
Amphlbole
:;';;1
I I 71
lite
11.2
0.5
Amphibole
Amphibole
!'--:l
I 72
L-"~l
.PDylltE)"w.
7
1
Amphlbole
Amphibole
.. 73 L~ ...JIAnth2P.~l'l!!L... 00 __ 1 7 1.1 Amphibole Amphibole
..J 74 L~J~~'\hQp.byjJ!.E!__oo ... 7.5 1.1 Amphlbole Amphlbole
! I 75
D8
m ]it\(1thophYllte
6.3
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
r 76
. !!Ant~ophYllte
306
1
Amphibole
Amphibole
l 77
m...J!6~tb2~e
108
O.B
Amphibole
Amphibole
!.... I 78
~...Jf8h\bQPhyl!1.~.... W
6.5
0.8
Amphlbole
Amphibole
j
! 79
.....1[A.DjilopJ:!yjlte - ....._1 18.6
05
Amphlbole
Amphibole
; J
80
r.~::~i!Q[Of,dpl;ie
I 14.8
0.8
Amphibole
Amphibole
\/1
81
F2 r==llC.r9cidolit~~~J 6.9
0.3
Amphibole
Amphibole
_J 82
[-IIAnthoph'll.ite....~:':"
9
Amphibole
Amphibole
r 83
L..jIAnthoehYllte
I 6.7
84
]rAvl,!!QPhylite ~""_,.:J 10.6
85 A7-D6 r Jll\Dft19P!lyli\~.-. ~ ~l 29.3
86
LM~JlAnthoI!DY@~ _ . J 22.6
87
c-l~R~9jilii-.-~ 7.5
88
c=J1[lotIlClRQYJii!L__,W] 10.3
89
[=~UGoC;laolit(l_~ ._] 16.1
90
c=ll8n!hQP1W1ite __._",~J 18
I 91
L8JlJ!JQPllYJiW
6.5
92
rAnttiQRhy!iJ~ _ "" ..
6.8
93
lite
I 7
94
F7 [ IIAUIJlQp~_~ 6.9
[ -If8nllNii6Yiite 95
" ..~ 7.1
J 96
c=J[5::rocidQUte
13
J 97
L_o_Jl8nl!1gpp.YJile
9.3
I I 98
]!Crocidolile
9
99
[Crocidolite
] 72
100
. oP. !Anlh~-hvii~-o''''''''-l 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . ." ' , .
13.8
1 101
c=J!Crocidolile
8.5
l 102
[~ !1Crocidolile
17.1
# Grid Op 14
M51863 005 Sample Comments:
Ipersonal rl~--=~
--------
0.8
Amphibole
0.8
Amphibole
Amphibole
0.6
Amphibole
0.3
Amphibole
0.8
Amphibole
0.4
Amphibole
1
Amphibole
1.1
Amphibole
0.3
Amphibole
0.3
Amphibole
0.5
Amphibole
1.1
Amphibole
0.4
Amphibole
0.4
Amphibole
0.3
Amphibole
1.8
Amphlbole
0.4
Amphibole
0.4
Amphlbole
0.3
Amphibole
v
.~ _ _ _ _ _
Amphibole
Amphibole
'W,
Amphlbole
Amphibole
3\1
Amphibole
~
Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphibole
Iv!
Amphlbole
Amphibole
[IP:
Amphibole
iSli
Amphibole
;,*:
Amphibole
[ri!,
Amphibole
~tY_
Amphibole
Amphibole
Amphlbole
Amphibole
Amphibole
.\j
Amphibole
"~--- ]
Si 0,01)
<;> L1S
5,12 )<-Iby EM'1Y (K.\!)
Si
li, lHhV EM'?Y (!(,W)
to.2. I
__ ,,' "J
SI
o
0.00
5.12 )(-~'Y (0.'9'1 (l<.V)
SI
o
5. X-Rl'l EM'9Y (KtV)
Si
o
F.
5,12
,
X-Ray EMr~y (KW)
Mg
5.12 x-thy ""99 (K.V)
$.
Mg
o
Fe
Si
o
Fe
:;.12 X-R,y En.'9Y (l<W)
SI
o
:>.114
5.t2
X"RlV eM'?? (K6\1)
F. 2.56
SI
o
10.24
F.
:l.12 X.Ray En.f9V (K.V)
IO,:.?>! 1
SI
r.
/:,".R~ttJf1).I~:S~Mh 'J~f?Z7~:.::/, :J;<".
;"'; l:lv*ti/ii.'ni6,a
591
S~r----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ -~~
s,
147
Ft
"!t"",.,,, 0.00
' dz .JI ",-uh,,\l
i I I 10.24 ,
X-Ray Ehtt9? (K&V)
SI
o
G.Ol)
F. 10.24