Document gbENdpVgrndRB4OeYg0qGDya
February 3, 2002
To: George Woodall, American Petroleum Institute
Richard Irons University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
From:
BamchBrody Baylor College of Medicine
Re: Ethics Review of Jan 30 Modified Version of Two Protocols
The two protocols submitted by Dr. Irons are the major part of a larger set of studies, which also includes a case control study of AMLINHL. The three studies have been reviewed together through the whole API sponsored ethics review process, which I have headed. However, the comments provided in this report are applicable only to the protocols of Dr. Irons, since that case control study will be reviewed by a separate IRE.
The following major decisions were reached in our ethics review and have, as noted below, been incorporated into the protocol:
benefit to the community: To begin with, the laboratory being created will leave Shanghai with a state of the art clinical laboratory and local personnel trained to run it. The project personnel will be working with the local professionals to integrate that lab into ongoing clinical practice in Shanghai. So there will be an immediate benefit to the community from the project. Moreover, commitments have been obtained from local officials that the resulting data will be used to strengthen local standards for benzene exposure.
benefit to subjects: In the disease progression study, attending physicians will be identified at clinic visits and will be notified of clinically relevant findings. Patients found to have developed benzene poisoning will be followed to insure that they are removed, as per Chinese law, from the benzene exposure workplace. So there will be real clinical benefits to the subjects from their participation.
payments to subjects to avoid exploitation and coercive offers: Our primary concern was to insure that the subjects not be exploited by being underpaid for their participation, rather than on insuring that they not be coercively induced into participating by overpayment. In general, they will be paid amounts that are similar both to payments in the U.S. and in China. The payments for filling out the questionnaire will go directly to the subjects. To avoid legal issues in China, the payments for all other aspects of participation will go to the clinical coordinators and/or the pathologists who will be responsible for insuring that they are used to pay the subject's non research related medical expenses.
protection of confidentiality: The clinical database from the diagnostic laboratory will of necessity contain identifiers of the subjects. Access to information in that database will be governed by the usual rules of confidentiality. The databases for the various studies will be separate from this clinical database and from each other. Data from the clinical database will be transferred to relevant research databases only after the subjects consent to participate in the relevant study. The research databases will not use the names of subjects, but will use codes whose linkage to the subjects will be in a separate file. Only a limited number of individuals will have access to all the databases. At the end of the studies, an additional database containing biological material, linked research
SH ELL-MCCLU RG-06S7S3
data, and linked clinical data will be constructed to support future research, but it will contain no identifiers and no linkages to subjects. informed consent: There will be separate consent forms for subjects and controls in each study. The purpose of the research and the role of the participants (as subjects or as controls) will be spelled out. These consent forms will clarify exactly what would be done as part of normal clinical practice and what will be done only if the subjects agree to participate in research. The financial arrangements will be clarified in the consent form as will the basic points about the confidentiality arrangements. information about HIV: Information about HIV status obtained as part of standard clinical practice will be in the clinical database, will be transferred to the research database for those consenting to be in the research, and will be reported in accordance with Chinese law. This will be explained in the consent form. control of publication of results: although the sponsors will have the opportunity to comment on the publication of results, the investigators have final control over all results to be presented or published. ongoing ethics review: the sponsors will create a four-person Ethics Review Panel (one US, one European, one Chinese, plus at least one representative of the workers/labor) to review both the final version of all the protocols and the ongoing research to see that these understandings have been implemented. There will be regular interaction between the Ethics Review Panel and the Scientific Review Panel. This report completes this review of protocols phase of the work. All future work should be part of the work of the ongoing Ethics Review Panel.
SH ELL-MCCLU RG-06S7S4