Document ga1m5YQD19EX0YwG4YJRJ3d7q

To: Heidi MeAuliffe[hmcauliffe@paint.org] Cc: David Darling[ddarling@paint.org]; Andy Doyle[adoyle@paint.org]; Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@e pa.gov] From: Bolen, Brittany Sent: Wed 5/17/2017 6:14:17 PM Subject: Re: ACA's Comment Letter on EPA Reg Reform Thanks, Heidi. Yes, we're getting lots of help to sort through comments. Appreciate you sending them directly to us as well. Will let you know if we have foilow-up questions. Best, Brittany > On May 17, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Heidi McAuliffe <hmcauliffe@paint.org> wrote: > > Hi Brittany, I hope you are doing weii and that you have a iot of help sifting through the 55,000 + submissions to the reg reform docket!! > > I am sharing ACA's comments with you directly as we discussed. Our comments stick to the format that we talked about so that you can discern the issue, impact, costs and suggested solution quickly. We would be happy to follow up with you and provide additional information on any of the issues that we have highlighted. In a recent coalition meeting, Samantha Dravis suggested that trade associations point out some of the smaller regulatory distractions that impede innovation and are burdensome. I believe that we have provided several examples of significant issues like the Ozone rule but also some of the smaller ones like the triennial reporting in the aerosol coatings regulation. > > Thank you for your willingness to take a look at our suggestions. I would like to follow up with you in the next few weeks to discuss any priority issues that catch your eye. > > Please let me know if you have any questions at all, > > Heidi > > > Heidi K. McAuliffe American Coatings Association Vice President, Government Affairs > 202- 719-3686 | 202-329-1065 (m) | 202-263-1102 (fax) | hmcauliffe@paint.org<mailto:hmcauliffe@paint.org> | www.paint.org<http://www.paint.org/> > > 901 New York Ave. NW, Suite 300 West Washington, DC 20001 > Coatings protect. Coatings preserve. Coatings provide. > > > > > > > From: Bolen, Brittany [mailto:bolen.brittany@epa.gov] > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 6:27 PM > To: David Darling <ddarling@paint.org> > Cc: Heidi McAuliffe <hmcauliffe@paint.org> > Subject: RE: Once-in, Always-in rule > > Thanks, David. It was a pleasure meeting you, too. > > From: David Darling [mailto:ddarling@paint.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 8:50 AM 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA - 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008290-00001 > To: Bolen, Brittany <bolen.brittany@epa.gov<mailto:bolen.brittany@epa.gov > Cc: Heidi McAuliffe <hmcauliffe@paint.org<mailto:hmcauliffe@paint.org > Subject: Once-in, Always-in rule > > Hi Brittany, it was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday, I wanted to follow-up with the 2007 proposed "once-in always in" policy rule - the citation is 72 Federal Register 69 (January 3, 2007) - docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0094- here is a link to the rule - https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/atw/gp/fr03ja07.pdf > > Best regards, > > David Darling > > Sent from my iPhone > <Dravis Ltr. Reg Reform 5.15.17 final.pdf> 17cv1906 Sierra Club v. EPA 6/22 Production ED 001523 00008290-00002