Document ga0vg2JQjp2321Qz8ymw3pdKL
MICHIGAN DIOXIN EXPOSURE STUDY
HALF-LIVES OF DIOXINS, FURANS, AND PCBS AS A FUNCTION OF AGE, BODY FAT, BREASTFEEDING, AND SMOKING STATUS
Milbrath MO1, Chang C-W1, Emond C2, Franzblau A1, Garabrant D1, Gillespie BW3, Wenger Y1, Adriaens P4 and Jolliet O1 1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 109 S Observatory, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; 2Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada 3Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 109 S Observatory, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; 4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan College of Engineering, 1351 Beal, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Abstract The half-lives of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) exhibit inter-individual variation based on different individual characteristics. Measured and modeled data from the literature were compared to examine the effects of age, percent body fat, and total body fat on the half-lives of 29 different congeners. Two strategies are proposed for adjusting half-lives for an individual based on a predefined reference value. An equation based on a linear relationship with age that is corrected for percent body fat, smoking status, and time spent breastfeeding a child provides results that are consistent with previously reported observations. Alternatively, an equation based on a linear relationship between half-life and total body fat adjusted for smoking status and time spent breastfeeding a child is proposed. This method requires further testing and validation against individual measurements.
Introduction The main goal of the University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study (UMDES) is to determine the factors that affect the current serum concentrations of 29 congeners of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). To understand and adjust the effects of past intake on current serum concentration of individuals1, it is necessary to know the half-life of each congener at each age of their lives. Inter-individual half-life variability can partially be attributed to certain individual characteristics. Previous studies examine the effects of some of these factors on the half-lives of selected congeners, but a comprehensive study of all crucial factors and multiple congeners is currently nonexistent, according to the authors' knowledge. This study provides an adaptive method of personalized half-life calculation, incorporating all of the crucial factors that are applicable to the 29 PCDD, PCDF, and PCB congeners2.
Materials and Methods A literature review was conducted to identify the most important factors that affect the half-lives of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds in the human body. Measured and modeled data in the literature were used to examine the relationship between half-lives and these factors. Half-life values for a reference adult male and a reference infant were used to produce a continuous interpolation of the halflife as a function of age, percent body fat, and total body fat. When percent body fat or total body fat information was not available, the mean body mass index (BMI) given by the NHANES data3 for each age was converted to a percent body fat using the approach proposed by Deurenberg et al4. Three models are tested to determine the best method to predict half-life: a model based on age, on percent body fat, and on total body fat. The differences between these models are illustrated using 2,3,7,8Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) is used as an example. The smoking adjustment factor was derived from Flesh-Janys et al.5. For congeners for which this information was not available, a mean value of the available congeners was assumed. A correction for breast feeding can introduced that accounts for the mother's drop in concentrations of dioxins, furans, and PCBs during breast feeding.
Results and Discussion The main factors that influence the half-lives of PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs are a high body burden of dioxin like compounds, smoking status, age, body fat, and time spent breastfeeding a child. Both smoking and having high body burden appear to increase the metabolism of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds through the induction of the cytochrome P450 enzyme6. Kerger et al.7 observe a concentration-dependent half-life, with shorter half-lives above a transition value of 700ppt in blood serum. Blood concentrations in the UMDES cohort are all below this level, thus it was not necessary to adjust half-lives for high body burdens. To ensure consistency, data from the literature for high body burdens were not considered in determining points of departure8. The effect of metabolism induction is accounted for in smokers, however, as they a exhibit a significant increase in decay rate for numerous congeners5.
Organohalogen Compounds Vol 69 (2007)
P-300
2252
MICHIGAN DIOXIN EXPOSURE STUDY
As shown if figure 1 there is a positive nearly linear association between age and half-life. This may indicate a direct relationship between age and half-life, or age may incorporate the effect of other parameters, such as the change in percent body fat with age. The short half-life in children may be partially attributed to dilution caused by rapid growth at young ages9. As children age, their rate of growth slows and the effect of metabolism on apparent half-life becomes more important than dilution.
Figure 1. 2,3,7,8 TCDD: Half-Life (years) as a function of age in years: modeled and measured data as reported in Milbrath et al.5,7,8,10,11. The Kerger 2006 data is for children <700 ppt only7. The two measured points below the curve between 25 and 30 years correspond to acute poisoning of two females with extremely high concentrations of TCDD (26,000 ppt and 144,000 ppt)12. The solid line connects the two point of departure values given in Table 1. Van Der Molen et al. (F-J) refers to the application of the model presented by Van der Molen et al to the Flesh-Janys data13.
The half-lives of PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs can also be partially correlated with percent body fat14. Figure 2 presents the same data as in figure 1, but with half-life expressed as a function of percent body fat. It appears that half-life increases as percent body fat increases. While this relationship holds well at older ages, it does not appear appropriate at younger ages (as shown by the arrow on figure 2). Because of this, the relationship between percent body fat and half-life could be useful for correcting the half-life for a given age, but should not be used to represent every stage of an individual's life.
20 Kerger et al. (2007)
18 Van der Molen et al.
16 Kerger et al. 2006 (TCDD/TCDF)
14 Measured points
Modeled points
12
Flesh-Janys
10 Van der Molen et al. (F-J)
8 %BF POD
6
4
2
0 10 15 20 25 % BF 30 35 40 45
Figure 2. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Half-life as a function of percent body fat. Arrow shows area where the relationship of increased half-life with increase body fat does not hold. These values represent young subjects.
Organohalogen Compounds Vol 69 (2007)
P-300
2253
MICHIGAN DIOXIN EXPOSURE STUDY
The results for the third model are shown in figure 3. This model plots half-life as a function of total body fat. Using absolute body fat rather than percent body fat better accounts for the effect of dilution found in children.
Figure 3. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Half-life in years as a function of total body fat (in kg). Once again, the two points below the curve correspond to acute poisoning of two females with extremely high concentrations of TCDD (26,000 ppt and 144,000 ppt)12. Based on the models presented above, two strategies are proposed for determining the half-lives of dioxins, furans, and PCBs in an individual. The first strategy is to use a linear relationship with age, using the reference values for an infant and for an adult male defined by Milbrath et al8 as points of departure. These reference values and corresponding intercepts and slope parameters for 29 congeners are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Parameter values for equations 1-3 (given below).
Correction factors are introduced for the percent body fat and smoking status of an individual at a given age.
Organohalogen Compounds Vol 69 (2007)
P-300
2254
MICHIGAN DIOXIN EXPOSURE STUDY
/,
,%
% %
(1)
Equation 1. Corrected half-life for an individual, where %BF is percent body fat, SF is smoking factor.
Gender differences are not explicitly accounted for in the below equations, but are indirectly included
through different specified percent body fat values for each age. The decay rate is calculated as a
function of half-life and the number of months spent breastfeeding a child during the considered year.
/
(2)
Equation 2. Corrected decay rate for an individual, where k breastfeeding is the rate constant for
breastfeeding in 1/year.
The alternative strategy is a linear relationship with absolute body fat (kg) (equation 3). The same
corrections for smoking status and breastfeeding are used as in equations 1 and 2, and intercept and
slope parameters are based on the same points of departure (reported in Table 1).
/,
(3)
Equation 3. Corrected half-life for an individual based on total body fat and smoking status.
When equation 1 was tested against the Flesh-Janys regression, a similar response was obtained over a wide age and percent body fat. There is not sufficient data to test the equation based on total body fat (equation 3), and this approach requires further validation. However, the described equations represent a simple and relatively consistent approach that can be used to determine individual half-lives for numerous dioxin, furan, and PCB congeners.
Acknowledgements Financial support for this study comes from the Dow Chemical Company through an unrestricted grant to the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Ms. Sharyn Vantine for her continued assistance and Drs. Linda Birnbaum, Ron Hites, Paolo Boffetta and Marie Haring Sweeney for their guidance as members of our Scientific Advisory Board.
References
1 Jolliet, O., Wenger, Y., Milbrath, M.O., Towey, T., Adrians, P., Garabrant, D., Franzblau, A, Chang, C-W., Gillespie, B.W., sumbitted to Organohalogen Compounds 2007.
2. Van Den Berg, M.; Birnbaum, L.; Bosveld, A. T. C.; Brunstrom, B.; Cook, P.; Feeley, M.; Giesy, J. P.; Hanberg, A.; Hasegawa, R.; Kennedy, S. W.; Kubiak, T.; Larsen, J. C.; Van Leeuwen, F. X. R.; Liem, A. K. D.; Nolt, C.; Peterson, R. E.; Poellinger, L.; Safe, S.; Schrenk, D.; Tillitt, D.; Tysklind, M.; Younes, M.; Wrn, F.; Zacharewski, T., Environmental Health Perspectives 106, 775 1998.
3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
4. Deurenberg, P.; Weststrate, J. A.; Seidell, J. C., British Journal of Nutrition 65, 105 1991. 5. Flesch-Janys, D., Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A 47, 363 1996. 6. Emond, C.; Michalek, J. E.; Birnbaum, L. S.; DeVito, M. J., Environmental Health Perspectives
113, 1666 2005. 7. Kerger, B. D.; Leung, H. W.; Scott, P.; Paustenbach, D. J.; Needham, L. L.; Patterson Jr, D. G.;
Gerthoux, P. M.; Mocarelli, P., Environmental Health Perspectives 114, 1596 2006. 8. Milbrath, M.O., Wenger, Y., Garabrant, D., Franzblau, A., Gillespie, B.W., Chang C-W., Jolliet,
O., submitted to Organohalogen Compounds 2007. 9. Clewell, H., Gentry, PR., Covington, TR., Sarangapani, R., Teeguarden, JG., Toxicological
Sciences 79, 381 2004. 10. Kerger, B. D., Leung, H.W., Scott, P.K., Paustenbach, D.J., Chemosphere In Press 2007. 11. Van Der Molen, G. W.; Kooijman, B. A. L. M.; Wittsiepe, J.; Schrey, P.; Flesch-Janys, D.; Slob,
W., Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 10, 579 2000. 12. Geusau, A.; Schmaldienst, S.; Derfler, K.; Papke, O.; Abraham, K., Archives of Toxicology 76,
316 2002. 13. Ogura, I., Organohalogen Compounds 66, 3376 2004. 14. Emond, C.; Birnbaum, L. S.; DeVito, M. J., Environmental Health Perspectives 114, 1394 2006.
Organohalogen Compounds Vol 69 (2007)
P-300
2255