Document gDpBzkDKk3vNwb8OLzj7RDYdG
Beveridge. Fairbanks & Diamond
Agenda PVC SAFETY GROUP MEETING
September 25, 1980 Washington, D.C.
EPA Revision of Vinyl Chloride Standard
I. Background A. Original EPA Position B. EDF Position C. Carcinogen Policy Hearings 1. Data 2. Witnesses D. EPA Estimated Costs for Compliance E. TRW Contract 1. Reasons for contract 2. Goal of contract 3. EPA authority to use private contractor a. No delegation of authority to enter premise for data gathering purposes 4. EPA prohibited from delegating rulemaking 5. Question on sharing confidential informa tion with contractor F. EPA Decision Date
II. Possible Strategies A. Seek to rescind existing proposed 'll amendment and existing Vinyl Chloride Standard B. Strategy A plus oppose totally the proposed data gathering effort and subsequent amendments by TRW and EPA . . ./2
SPl-09013
Agenda
2
II. Possible Strategies (continued) C. Oppose the proposed amendments because there is no health basis, but accept amendments favorable to the PVC Safety Group D. Work with EPA on revising standard to alleviate the PVC Group's complaints E. Do not oppose any EPA effort F. Work with Congress to amend 112
III. Tactics A. Economic analysis B. Health data summary C. Legal summary D. Development of P.R. summary 1. Use with media 2. Use with Congressional and EPA staff
IV. Future Action A. TRW plant visit problem B. Law suits filed by Department of Justice 1. Options a. Press release B. Contact with EPA and Justice lawyers C. Preparation to implement strategy
SPI-09014
Beveridge. Fairbanks & Diamond
PVC SAFETY GROUP October 9, 1980
Possible Strategies:
1. Rescind existing proposed '77 amendment. 2. Rescind existing vinyl chloride standard.
3. Rescind existing 'll amendment and oppose totally the
proposed data gathering effort and subsequent amendments
by TRW and EPA.
\ ,-
Oppose the proposed amendmentsbecause there is no
s.
health basis, but accept amendments favorable to the
PVC Safety Group.
5. Work with EPA on revising standard to alleviate the,;
PVC Group's complaints.
.6 Do not oppose any EPA effort.
7. Work with Congress to amend 112.
SPI-09015
October 9, 1980
FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE SPI PVC SAFETY GROUP ALTERNATIVES COMMITTEE
OUTLINE--CONTINGENCY PLANNING
Purpose: To identify some responses to potential
[name of agency]
regulatory activity.
Situation: 1.
promulgates and enforces [name of agency]
regulations addressing chemical substances
pursuant to ___________ acts: [number]
a. [Name of Act]
b. [Etc.]
2-4. [Continue with general discussion of the
regulatory posture taken by [name of agency]
toward PVC/VCM and toward the potential
hazards presented by PVC/VCM, paying careful
attention to the approach [name of agency]
has taken toward other substances associated
with the same potential hazards.]
5. [Name of Act]
[Provide basic discussion of situation as it
relates to referenced act and repeat this
treatment for each act referenced in paragraph 1
above.]
SPI-09016
i -2-
What If:
1. : [Cite relevant act or statutory provision]
[Insert description of regulatory action of
concern. The concern is usually with the less
favorable course of action. Using this format,
list all potential activities of concern.]
a. Impact: [Low, Medium or High]
b. Our influence: .[Low, Medium or High]
Tracking:
Information and Sources:
1. : [Cite relevant act or statutory provision]
a. [name of source]
b. [Etc.; List all sources.]
[Possible sources include: direct agency contacts,
other trade associations, Keller & Heckman, trade
press, other industry sources, agency announcements,
the Federal Register, public news media, member
information, etc.]
Triggers:
1. : [Cite relevant act or statutory provision]
[Insert description of event which would
trigger activation of contingency plans.]
2. [Etc.]
Contingency Plans: [Describe the plans to be implemented if
any of these trends develop into an active threat.]
Trigger 1:
[Contingency Actions a. b. c. ]
Trigger 2: [Etc.]
SPI-09017
-3Anticipatory Action Underway: [Describe any actions being
taken by the PVC Safety Group.]
S PI-09018