Document g2wnBeKb56YbLoVLNyv4mO553

;-7I. yy.JSZIZALS STANDARDS INSTITUTE, ETC., E-210 ROUTE IfA, PADAl.-JS. 3.J. C7AS2 .nirJTES OF THE IZETIRG - -- - -1' -- 1. ~ _ _ ' _ ^ ^ ^ 1 * of ths^ ^ -... v -vj. r .^--^ i^f c* a'cow" :.`c*T cr.'i 'r!' ^sr?.v.';.cE a;.2 ssi---'3-e r hi-*ZZ .-. ------:'. ....,-. -- AS SSSTOS S.T.UDY CO:.S..UTTEE.. r -. -... i-Z *-*fs">."3-----*-._ --'."-.-J\3 ~r..\:t * ? - -T- hurr"s'd',a'y~,.-.'Ayugust 3t,'1.1i9n7W8 5a1c';v9:30.[ rA._*ilV1i---. Tf'*-" CJ IPPIlaaiinnttiiffffcs'' FEvxhhiihbiit ' s; ? .:.* 'T`'T - Jr n: J :..V . r ; r BX 45 * - Institute Office, E-213 Route 4, Paramus, H.J. .. . Plaintiffs' Exhibit AB 195 -.bees piizsurr - - L.:i ....- ........... .' . ....... T'agoer,. Chairman. . Carlisle Corporation ' `.Jicholson --r-Xila i::::.'. : Abex Corporation" t .. ."".7" E. Stone. bl~- ;.=' T ir*.' V .Seadix Corporation 7-L7.`.,.Z" V. Armstrong 3 ro.r .-.it oorcT ...Seadix Corp_oration'x-^,'`~ ' a',, 717;.:..* .'l.-l'. "J777 r T-~ ,l"Z~ r "*~..I7Ivl" c; -- - 2---' V-'-trl o.tr icTL-n-'Lc rerrl^i: --1&..S ABSS;vT ; J.ir-'.rc l i..r a? I. c-vlz ::-z rj.-ir - -= - ir. _ j- t. - Duaderdale\- c; E. Weaver r-.-T.J .e.-.-'r-s-r --j1 -.;. .- Lear-Siegler, Inc. Haynes10$-ManhattanThe~ 77...7- ~TZ."_"7 ,"7,,;-.7t'.Z ' " '* ^ IzEtS PS2SEOT P Ooraan, Attorney ` islane. Secretary t.. . . .1 / Goraan" 6 ?oi ",..*71.. . . ^7 ^ Friction llaterials ^Standards Institute . 11". e meeting uas called to order byTir. Wagner, Chairman,'at 9:30 A.ll. "'T'T...* - - - * ' *- - * Z U" T * " ^ ..J ZJ J 1 ,, J *," ^ "**" . iXiUTES ~OF PREVIOUS iSETINC ' " .. ] . e minutes of the taeeting held*January 19, 1978 had been distributed. These * ' nutes were reviewed by the Secretary and a motion for their acceptance was * de. .........* ...... . . , ....7. on motion duly made, seconded and unanimously passed, it was; RESOLVED: To accept the minutes of the January 19," 1978 `.!Z.. . meeting as written, ...................... ~ '. --............. * --* * r- -r t.'..-. r:.r.5rii < .-. . :... s^rs::. . A 1 iT.ERSr.IP OF Cd IHTTES i Secretary..advised tiiat It. C. Nicholson was replacing !*x. B. J. Iwarsson. ?n Abex Corporation on the Committee. Other than this change", the Committee . rbershi? remains the same as in the jest fiscal year. In addition to members. c. ~ Committee, .-ir. Jim Reis of^Jolins-Hanville .has been invited to serve as _ , & 'iate of tlie Committee, At this Augu3t 3, 157C taeeting llr. Dunderdale . i : Jeaver were not present. ;-lir. , VJeaver called on August 2, 1978 to advise . at .he could not attend because of-a last minute scheduling problem at hi* home art. In the meanwhile, he had phoned the" Secretary to suggest several . an-es to the work practices booklet.__Ha bad asked that these-suggested changes considered at this meeting.... . CS STUDY CO'l.TT -2- August 3, 1973 "HOAX PI ACTI CDS BOOHLZT .* .gner, Chairman of tae Committee and Chairman of the Task Force that worked a tae work practices booklet explained to the-Cokniccee. t.:e major raaao*. for his meeting. He apologized to the Committee for the__Task Force's atteaptito oaplete the work practices booklet' without." having-final- Committee approval efore being sent to the Board of Directors,.,, The Secretary read fronthe niautes f the Board of Directors meeting, wnieh" was held tin" June 27," '1973, concerning he v;ork practices booklet.:. At the Board meeting, the. Directors reviewed the ext of the suggested work practices booklet" which had been completed'by the Task orce. The Directors asked several questions concerning the booklet including uc'a iteas as the disclaimer at the front of the booklet and they questioned nether the disclaimer was strong enough. A Director had also criticised the! !-_1 ppeaeix where the F.Sl was listed as a source, for information concerning iteas uch as the OSVJ. regulations, E?A regulation, etc. There were soce items "in the-'-"" ext with which the Directors did net 'agree.' At the Board meeting it was asked 2- f the Committee had reviewed_ this work after _the Task Force had completed - the a rite-up. The Secretary indicated that- the Task Force did not submit it" to the- - ommittee because of the lengthy time it had taken to get it into the form shown, he Board of Directors then resolved to have this "booklet submitted to the .full"7^.1 sbestos Study^Committee for their recommendations. When the Committee has inished reviewing the booklet they were to re-submit it to the Doard of --- --T irectors. " - . rjv..?.' .. a order to review the booklet text, the Secretary read from comments he had"7 f ved from .ir. Heaver, lir. 'leaver suggested that the art work should be . d. There was an indication that this might be possible based on the ~ ~ ' -veiing letter received from Lir. Cooper of Johns-'.laaville. "lir. Armstrong crit--"' cized the illustration showing the mechanic blowing dust from a set of brakes, e felt that there should be something to Indicate that the mechanic was using ye protection during this operation. Another question concerned the respirator llustrated towards the end of the.booklet. It was stated that it trould be etter if this respirator had "Approved-'.stamped on.it.; . A member indicated that his was not a widely used respirator and that it would be preferable if the llustration showed a worker with the respiratorTiost commonly"usedin this -21-'--- - nvironsent. A member stated that the most -widely 'used approved'-reapirator for his use would be the 321--S710 disposable respirator. The Secretary asked If -- nyoae had illustrations of .the 311-6710 respirator, that could be used to show ne artist. If not available, the Secretary stated that he would write 311 to--- - acuest such an illustration. JCt was agreed that If the booklet were published aat this illustration would be* changed to*show"the 311-8710 :respirator. * r. Heaver had suggested a different title for the booklet. The title shown on ne Task Force's booklet was "Friction liaterials Dandling liethods." Lir. Weaver uggested "Jte commended Work Practices for Asbestos Friction liaterlals. During rake and Clutch Servicing." lir. Weaver bad indicated that the "Asbestos riction liaterlals" part of this title could be shown in bolder type with 'the cher words-in smaller type. This "suggested title was considered too loo; by - - ne Coaaittee" members.` It was stated that an Institute booklet should he generic r"""'neral in items and should-not be tied specifically to asbestos.- There are" ** : 'lemeats in the dtist that should-be controlled. Perhaps the precautions ig ad would apply to dust from other materials as well "as asbestos dust;-:*-ancern was expressed that-other-fibers'may create problems similar to those ex- iriehced with* asbestos.' It-was "suggested that in addition to being too long,....... ne suggested .title was too specific.- A member-suggested that the appropriate ltie could be ''Friction !Iaterials Work Practices Methods." "It" was suggested - .-.isciccs at'jcy v-o'.i AA -3- August 3, 1973 because of the many decisions to be cade at tris meeting it was decided that.. I resolutions would sot be necessary for every editing change to the booklet, but ' --r changes would be indicated when members approved certain wording. At this."' the Comic tee I-ecbers approved the wordiag^Friction Haterials "ork..*. '-rawcices Guide11 as the tfcle for the booklet. r. In. addition, it was suggested!" :hat-"friction Materials Standards .Institute,-. Inc. '* be.shown in.smaller type'at'""'! :.ie bottom of the front cover.- :A suggestion was.cade that-2`FliSX!.** oe;inserted! 'he Secretary noted chat in, the. copy, from Johnsr'ianville_ that."Friction Ilateriala' tandaras Institute" had been.put at .the top of.the front'cover but"it did not"!.' hot.* in the stencilled copies made for the Committee. Members. 'ibis "Friction * atarials Standards Institute* should be dropped to the boctom'of the front over. i.t a later point in the meeting it was stated that the month and year - f publication should"also be shown on the front cover. It was suggested that ne month and year of publication be show, at Che top of the front cover." ' r. leaver had reiterated that Raybestcs-Manhattan did not agree with the dis- " ;aimer shown in the third paragraph under the Introduction.- The Members read lis disclaimer wording and'agreed that it was appropriate as written. ' One ;'.'I . inker indicated that his company would not proceed with distribution" of the"! !; \ :oklet without a disclaimer approved by.Counsel.--.The jiabers "accepted"the word-, ig as shown in tne text. j-s-- zr" cbz.-r.: sn: over.:*: : the boctom 6f this first pare under "Asbestos and friction .Taterials" it was ,, iggestea that the words "Frooer 'Jork Practices....." be underlined. This was ' emphasize this point. Counsel stated that if this sentence was underlined he uld insist that the disclaimer language be underlined. "Counsel stated that it uld be inappropriate if other wording was emphasised more than the disclaimer. ' decided not to underline this wording. . . ' f the page euranarizing the OSHA Asbestos Standard, 7Ir. Weaver had suggested that e summary be moved to the rear of.the booklet along with the reference sources - r additional information, such as the Asbestos Information Association, : " letion Materials Standards Institute or.the users' friction materials supplier, nember suggested that the blank area over.the summary`of the "'OSHA Asbestos" . I, sndard have a prominent VWET.'j ;In essence, the 11421" is questioning!the illus-. ition telling a mechanic not to use an air hose,, and the" OSHA Asbestos Standard the answer. It was stated that use of this.space on this page would help ihasize the importance of these procedures. The lleabers agreed that the sua- ry of the OSHA Asbestos Standard should stay were originally sec and that' V should be placed in large letters over the text. . .. ._ .* .. . uestion was raised about the use of the word "ceiling" concentrations'. 'This . ding was used in the OSEA Standard. . It was suggested that a user in a brake p might misunderstand the term "celling.11. One might chink that measurements to be made at the celling in the workplace rather than In the imedlate work- ce area, ylt was felt that this "celling" usage could be confusing to .the *.*" nitiaced.- -It was suggested chat a word such as "maximum" or "peak".be added. . word '.`maximum" could also be confusing and it was suggested that the word ... " ak`; be sham in parenthesis following the word ''ceiling" for the exposure its. There were additional eomenta mode concerning the "two fibers" and the ctuatloa that appeared after it. By reference to the OSHA Standard as written, ' 'ding was left as shown.. In a further reading, the wording "All external machinery and equipment must be maintained free of asbestos fiber. .. aflu--.-ien',' was reviewed. Seference is not made to machinery and equipment in OSHA text. Those words were therefore removed. Ac the bottom of this page irence to the Appendix was removed, because the. Appendix was to he dropped in ir of new wording. ' ibest os Study Committee -4- Aucust 3, 1S75\..; r. ''saver had suggested rei.'ordir.^ of the caption over the illustration of a or^er vacuuming a'brake drum! !'-e had suggested that the words "brake assemblies"._ s- ' -ce the word "brakesC"-*Members felt that this applied to clutch'housings as;.:" s to brake' assemblies'and that'the wording "brakes" should be dropped..zz:.-j t.v. * i__*__*-- J t* 1 ' . !____J _________\ A ____ . _ # . 4 __ * .iu. * ere made forr-a rather-complete.revision of the second paragraph. Eis suggestions.-, ere acceptedi,"except'that"in"the'last; sentence" the'Members wished to change the* s:. eggsseed 'wording to "This'.may'keep'du'st levels'below OSEA naximums and eliminate.-.: he need ffoor respiratory protection! 1 !zcl r- -... if ;..'2 or he-ccni ilio.'* =.? .; ^ ...7 ... n the next section Hr. Ueaver's' suggestions ware considered, and changes were zo ade to* both the'text and the suggestions'. - ^particular, the last sentences were - hanged to read'as follows:' ''Heat' and' abrasion'during normal use" may generate-.; use containing asbestos. Some dust will accumulate in brake and clutch csamblies.'1 The Members*felt that it'vas not necessary to indicate ::drum': brake .z r ,:dry,: clutch"assemblies.-'r Other suggestions in this section by Hr. Heaver were-1, ccepced. ' He indicated that"dust `"can" be removed.' Another suggestion accepted r.Hr as to separate "the"'paragraphs* in_ the_ next' section. '.The.other was to remove the..', s.. ords "air purifying" before" respirator ."--Under Machining Friction tlaterials; eaver's suggestion to remove the words "or press brake" was -accepted i-..1 cvo;.*: er Hr. Weaver's suggestion," the "Dust-Collection Methodsheading should be all : aps. At the end of the second paragraph under this section "below permissible -.: avals" was changed to "within permissible levels."" The entire next paragraph was - e-'ved.' It was felt inappropriate that the Institute recommend adapting or ' . !.- - - -ing other peoples* equipment.-In order to get this message in the text it .* a jested that the NIOSE recommendations that a hose of a high efficiency . .1 ndustrial vacuum be attached to the arcing machine exhaust be worded exactly as IOSE had worded It. In ^ this fashion,-'-this will be a N10SB recommendation,. In ddition,' the reference to;the Appendix was -removed. -- -' '- v.; s/.a t*, ' g. ^ : i 4 .. ...... . r . >. * t . i %: '3 here the entrance warningrsign is-shbwn in* all:capital letters,-Counsel indicated hat this applies more emphasis `to* the -sign'thaa'the disclaim4r wording.' :Tr.vas;'. uggested that either the disclaimer'wording- be put in"caps,'-"or that this lettering, e put in the same type'size:and style'as that used`in'the remainder of-the text; t was decided that the asbestos"dust warning sign for the entrance be sec in the ' ame type size as used in the balance of the text; - x. Heaver had suggested that the words "multiple stage high efficiency filters". : e used in the wording at the top of this final page. This suggested wording ppeared appropriate anil was accepted by the Committee.- Reference to the Appendix . as eliminated. The one sentence which' had the smoking, washing and showering eferred to was changed to three separate sentences: "Do not smoke.'' - "Wash before - ating." '.Shower after won:.". The last part of the paragraph concerned the laun- -- ering of asbestos-exposed clothing by an industrial laundry.! It was pointed out . hat some shops use disposable clothing. It was felt that wording for this section s sensitive and that wording directly from the OSSA Standard be used concerning -. he laundering of asbestos contaminated clothing.- - The-wording from the standard as used as the final sentence. -- a final two paragraphs of the booklet,* extensive changes-had been suggested. *x. __aver suggested that the last sentence 'in the first paragraph be eliminated; he wording was changed substantially but it was not eliminated. There was a... . . uggestion that-in the final paragraph, that the words "requirements of applicable . awsi: be changed to "in accordance with applicable regulations." This wording - * Asbestos Study Committee -5- August 3, 197Q, was changed completely. cart of 'the wording was adopted as suggested and the f il paragraph was' cade to read as follows:" i.;: ..V Id iU must be disused .ofjat/sites operated in accordahce'with applicable'tO law> and regulations'. " ; - v "' '-"j -"1^- .zii-dr ..-u 'c*j -- .*.* f"f. V.7r-v < r-.r c'-*-:** '.Jhile this had been noted'earlier the words "air purifying" before respirator v.t; were to be removed wherever shown in the'text. ' The Committee reconsidered the -'ir: suggestion that the suemary of_ the OSEA Asbestos Standard! be`moved to the rear-*- ` of book. However, it was decided that*it was appropriate to leave this after .. - ' the Introduction page,, with emphasis on ,:UEYM' over the text. ' As regards the suggestions by Mr. Cooper of Johns-Manvi lie, it was felt that the! text should be on one.color .paper. . Lather than debate this it was suggested that the color be*a light blue,' with black'printing .thereon. It might be possible.to -;.T cost that muck core than white:'^If the Directors "concur: in proceeding with publication of this hooi.lat, it was suggested that"decisions"as regards the use of a second color would he left to the.discretion of the Committee Chairman working with the Institute's Secretary. This was decided to expedite-the booklet;*/. snA to prevent the .selection, of colors from becoming an obstacle.to completing t task. * .......... " i .: s.*..T t *4 . * t Mr. cooper's recommendation.that the Institute have the illustrations in the booklet made into posters was considered. It was felt that this could be a worthwhile suggestion but that it is more important to have the booklet approved by the Board of Directors than it is to resolve a question concerning posters. It was suggested that if the Board of Directors concur in proceeding with the booklet that the Asbestos Study Committee will then consider rhe suggestion on oosters. .* Upon motion duly made, seconded 'and unanimously passed, it was: I2S0LVED: That the 'Comrittee recommends publication - - of the ;vFriction llacerlals Uorks Practices . . Guide* with the revisions adopted by the- " - . : Committee at this August 3, 1978 meeting.' - "' ' . ... '....-- It was suggested that the Secretary preoare a double spaced draft of the text as., approved by the Committee for submission to the -Board of Directors. The Secretary. Indicated-that he did not know whether the Board of Directors would call a meeting ar would handle this "by mail'ballot, but that-he would discuss this with .the**' President of the Institute. *'* _. . l.i . . ' CONSUMES. PRODUCT SAFETY GJ-KISSION ?ht ~retary revised the resolution passed at the Membership Meeting on June 29, .978. This resolution had been introduced by lir. Adrian Comins and passed the lembership by a vote of 6 in favor, 2 opposed, with 3 abstaining. The resolution 'as "That the Priceion Materials Standards Institute take an active role with the QtinAw i fj>*w ce^ '*** Jj ** - *' Asbestos Study Committee - -6- August 3, IS78 la discussing implementation of this resolution with Counsel and the President ' - * ^ return from the Annual Meeting, it was suggested that this be submitted ' * e Asbestos Study.Committee.for_its consideration. Copies of.the resolution anc its background were,,sent ,to_Asbestos Study Committee Members'prior`to; this meeting. In addition,; copies: of. the.Kearney.report for the'Consumer Prodiic't^ Safety Commission4op the uses of`asbestos in'cbn$umer`''products'was'also"vi5"*v distributed to the Members. Legal Counsel' advised" that'the Consumer"Product* Safety Commission had no jurisdiction, under either the Federal'lazardous' Substances Act (brake linings, not being a "bmned hazardous substance'.' as. . . defined there) or the Consumer Product Safety Act-, to*recall' brake linings'.''. '' '".iotor vehicle equipment" expressly is not a "consumer product", under the' '' c* ` Consumer Product Safety. Act, and specifically is governed by the Department'' of Transportation under the. National Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Act*of . *:; 1966. Copies of a letter by Legal Counsel on this matter had been distributed"" to Committee Members.,'22 , 2 ................. . . Foe Chairman had studied this .resolution "and.based'on the. remarks',in Counsel' letter and the Kearney report,, he drafted^the.following: .'.'Eased upon the Kearney report to CP SC which excludes brakes7aad"clutches from the Commission jurisdiction, and advice from_Institute!s Counsel opinion that we are rather governed by the Motor.Vehicle.Safety .Standards Acti'we do.not recommend any 1 present repr.es.entation...to t. he Consumer 'Product'Safety.' .Commission. {",,**.'; ;*" jj m*-. r -i- * " ** * *w ....^ ?... **." or* " " *, k rfi.** . .. n , Upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously,passed, it'was -- '.cl. r RESOLVED: That the Asbestos Study Committee recommends "that* the Institute not make representations to the Consumer Product Safety Commission concerning .. possible recalls of asbestos-bearing friction .. materials. 0 - ' . .*. : c.\ . - j - N' A' TIONAL ' HIGHWA"Y TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRAT' ION' * ".Z' The Secretary circulated a memo concerning the National-Highway Traffic Safety Administration and an inquiry.they had made concerning non-asbestos friction materials. This inquiry had been made by a Mr. Manny Lorenco of NHTSA during* ~ the Secretary's absence after the Annual Meeting. Miss Collins had received this call from NETSA and talked with the Secretary who cried to.answer some of the questions concerning non-asbestos friction materials. ' While the subject of the memo concerned an inquiry as.to the"types of non-asbestos friction materials and the costs thereof, the Secretary indicated that he was concerned about the fact that the question had been raised by NHTSA. Perhaps this question may have been asked with the idea of a possible banning of asbestos-' ' oearing friction materials by the Department of Transportation. It was asked '. if anyone'-else had information on this particular item. It was' suggested " *' chat this*- could be simply a random question prompted by some inquiry made" of the NHTSA. ' - - - - It was stated chat some Europeans, notably the Swedes, have considered the ' of banning asbestos products." However, this has not been taken too 3c sly to date. There has been no word from anyone else in the Membership concerning NHTSA activity relative to asbestos free friction materials." It' was suggested that Committee Members monitor any inquiries in this area. ' Che Secretary indicated that he would probably be going to Washington . In September and could make inquiry of NHTSA at that tine. It was '. ' ' suggested that there would be no purpose in such an inquiry unless SISCOS Study Co: :tee -7- August 3, 197S hr-- were more information^ concerning the Department ofJTrcnsportation's c in this area. ;Cne Member suggested that if NHTSA did have such a ____ion under study that Clfe Asbestos Information Association, would have picked - p this information by nov;, ' Counsel suggested that.'a search could be .made: on _lavs . r.d regulations concerning recalls' of automotive equipment under . the Uotor^Vehcile ; afety and StandardsAct.'if a s'earch'on this-'subject and a report to the.,*- zi iractors was desired'It could be done.' The Secretary-indicated;-that ,,he..would, ask - he Board of Directors ' concerning whether a search and report concerning. DOT re- all procedures should be made.-' -- L'-J .-la;:-- .. `rlli * t- QSrIA. GENERIC STANDARD he OSNA Generic Standard in essence would classify various materials as to whether hey are knoTjn carcinogenic, carcinogenic suspects or other. In the case of sbestos, it vould'be a Type I or a known carcinogen.. .In .this case, according to ha CSNA Generic Standards,' the concentrations of asbestos in the.workplace oust e held to the lowest feasible level. It has not been decided at this tine whether his OSIN. Generic Standard would replace the Asbestos Standard now in place>_earings have been held in Washington over the past several months concerning this eneric Standard but it will be sometime before additional rulemaking is made.^--^ INSTITUTE SPONSORSHIP OF ASBESTOS SS3TJAR h "stitute sponsored an Asbestos Seminar in December 1975 at which several i made presentations. One of the highlights was the talk by Ur. Byung Kwon r the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. It was been suggested and ecomaended by the President that the Institute consider sponsoring another, eminar- At the January 1978 Committee meeting it was voted that the Committee :id nut feel it appropriate to have a seminar until such time as the work practices c>oklet had been completed. It might be appropriate If the work practices booklet s finished and ready for distribution that a seminar be coupled with its initial .istrlbution. The Committee felt that this condition has not changed and that atil such time chat there Is a booklet to distribute .that there would be no urpose in holding a seminar. '-; he Secretary advised that on August 2, 1978 Dr. William Nicholson of Mount Sinai ad come to cne Office to tali', with Mr. Wagner and the Secretary. Questions by r. Nicholson concerned the forms is which asbestos-bearing brake linings had been .sed over the past many years. He was looking for information as to when molded Inings replaced woven linings, and when bonded undrilled linings came onto the .arketplace. Be was also concerned with the amount of work done In brake shops, nd whether, they cut, drill and otherwise machine friction materials or whether hey just install an assembly, lir. Wagner and the Secretary had as best they ould filled Dr. Nicholson in on this type information at this informal meeting, efore Dr. Nicholson departed, the Secretary asked whether he or others at Mount inal would be willing to address a seminar if the Institute were to sponsor such n affair. The Secretary indicated that Dr. Nicholson stated that he would be t a- - to accept such an invitation. It was suggested that if a seminar is held, * o ''ration be given to inviting either Dr. Nicholson or someone from Mount in. or a presentation. bestvs Study Connitree -0- August 3, 197G AtSr.ICAK T~~uC::i;?G ASSOCIgTIOK PROGRA!! ;. . . . etary advised that be had received an invitationfrom the American Trucking-`"* ;oc^.ation to circulate a promotion. for _ATA courses on the handling "of hazardous' tes. The ''hazardous wastes" referred .to were primarily nuclear and 'chemical,1'" ~~ : it is possible that asbestos waste nay.have been considered. VIt has."generalfy ;''y :n the policy that the Institute will not send.out sailing lists'to"those ' ;**'* nesting, because of the over abundance of mail.received by liecbers'from.'. '** ' y olicited sources. It was- suggested that the Institute continue this practice ' ,y'; no mailing be nade of the ATA program. t C re being no other business brought to the attention of the Committee, : a notion duly made, seconded and unanimously passed, it was;y RESOLVED: - To Adjourn'. : ai- ..j auroed: 2:20 P .II. *. t * * . f. biuo ial: e.\ . ... . . E. L\ Drislane Secretary -