Document g2Z5qvoXM7gevxkXa3E6nwEkQ

Dear;Dr. Merlins I wish fco report: fchat our specfcro- graphie analysis of the urinesample on the maintenanoi man which you sent in last week contains only the normal mounts of lead* The finding was?*05 mgs. per liter , wh'i`c`h i`s wel"l wi-th-in the nonaa_l li.mi..ts, j think. ,, therefore# this excludes thelikelihood of any appro- -,,' 'V'.4hv T ; V'.'.'-. : _ *... ciablesor sigtiifleant lead exposure on thia*man*s part. However if anythings happens to confirm your tentative conclusion that lead may have entered into the picture, , I would be very glad to hear from you further. v ? ` r" ' ; -< Cordially yours, s - -% .. . ! S' .* RAKjis 'S,< - ' * ' ` - .`f: - ' ' '* . .!->>>* ' ' Robert A* Kehoe, li.D.