Document g25JzyQradevR5V4k2v09EbKq
\
}
C 0 C_0 NF1DEHTIAL A T T 0 Ft W K Y--C LIEN T PRIVILEGE
Dote: October 15, 1969
Subject: REPORT OF AROCIOR "AD IIOC" COMMITTEE . ^Second Draft)'
To; Rodney Harris, Jr. Director, Law Department
From: -
M. N. Farrar P. B. Hodges, Secretary E. V. John W. R. Richard E. P. Wheeler, Chairman
Copy $3--H. S. Bergen, Jr. #2--J. E. Springate #3--M. N. Farrar
#4--P. B. Hodges y/!3--E. V. John j/6--W. R. Richard
//7--W. C. Robinson #8--W. A. Kuhn
//9--T. K. Smith #10-J. Mason #11-H. L. Minckler Origins1-E. P. Wheeler
DSW 164905
WATER_PCB-SD0000017974
446 [https: //www.infodox.com/ssc:ui'e/ciats2/Lighttoot.-'mith/'images/54/54446.CPC?strict:scale=fiUvidth:Dage=ldbici=smithc!bid=snPag6 2 of 25
COWTEWTS
3* Evidence of Problem
Page 1-2
2. Toxicological Aspects
_
3~5
3* Persistence or Lack of Biodegradation
6
Pressures which Will Affect Sales and U3es of Aroclors 125^ and 1260
7
5. Laws and Regulations Controlling Environments3 Contamination
A. U.S. Dept, of 1IEW-FDA
8
B. U.S. Dept, of Agriculture
8
C. U.S. Dept, of Interior-FWPCA
9
D. State Legislation
9
6. Legal Indications
- 10
7. Alternative Courses of Action `
11-12
8. Status of Individual Products
A. Summary of Sales Volumes
13
B. Functional Fluid Uses
.
13-18
C. Plasticizer Uses
18-19
D. Possibility of Contamination from Plasticizer Uses
_ 19-20
E. The Chlorinated Terphenyls
20
9. Recommendations
21
10. Summary
. 23
J DSW 164906
WATER-PCB-SD0000017975
1. EVIDENCE OF PROBLEM
'
For the last Fifteen years there has been crowing world wide concern regarding the persistence of chlorinated pesticides (particularly DDT) and their universal pre sence in man, food, animals, fish, birds, air, water4, and soil, DDT and its metabolites have been found in virtually every living organism and matter around the globe--including penguins in the Antarctic and the polar ice cap.
As analytical techniques for measuring the residues have improved, interfering substances have become apparent and raised doubts as to the quantitative validity of reported concentrations. Gas chromatograph techniques, making possible determination in the parts per billion
and parts per trillion range are particularly sensitive not only to''DDT but also to its metabolites DDE, the insecticides Dieldrin and Aldrin, and polychlorinated biphenyls (P CB , isomers of which have similar reten tion times '( peak locations"J in the gas chromatogram.
Identification of some of the major interfering sub stances as PCB's was announced by Professors Widmark and Jensen of the Institute of Analytical Chemistry at Stockholm in November, i960. With the identification (confirmed by mass spectroscopy) Widmark and Jensen announced finding PCB's in fish, birds, eggs, pine needles and childrens' hair. Samples analyzed were all from Sweden and the Swedish coastal areas.
Subsequently, PCB's were identified in fish and wild life in Great Britain (l9&7)> the Rhine River and Netherlands estuaries (March, 1969).
In August of 1968, Professor Risebrough of the Univer sity of California at Berkeley presented a paper at a ,
private meeting of toxicologists indicating he had
-
found PCB's in fish and wildlife along the coast of
California. The first reference in the American public
press followed the publication of Risebrough's paper
in Nature, February, 1969. At that time the San Fran cisco Chronicle carried a "scare" story concerning PCB's
after an interview with the author.
*
In the last six months, PCB's have been reported in:
a. Milk in Georgia
b. Waters of Lake Michigan
j c. Fish in Connecticut
d. Sea food along the Gulf Coast (fcoxic--fatal
to shrimp at Pensacola)
`
-1-
DSW 164907
WATER_PCB-SD0000017976
446Jjrttp5:/,,,wV'.-V''. iniodox.com/secure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images/54/54446.CPC ?strict;scale^itwidth:pags=ldbid=smitbdbid=snPapg 4 of
1. EVIDENCE OF PROBLEM (Continued)
e. Electric dishwashing compounds
f. Milk in Maryland
g. Bald eagles "from the mid-west and
h. Mother's milk (rumor--not confirmed) in Denver.
After invesligatlon--not complete in all cases--the comutJ t'tcc has concluded:
1. That the identification of the PCB's as contamInxints of the environment is certain;
2. There is no question as to the non or low bio-
gradability of the PCB's--particularly the
higher chlorinated members of the series in
cluding Aroclors 125^ and 1260 and probably
12'l8;
-
3. The possibility of natural origin of the PCB's (such as biological or chemical degradation of other chlorinated hydrocarbons by natural processes or metabolism in the eco-systero) is so remote that it is not a satisfactory expla
nation of their presence;
- ^t. As discussed in the following section., these - may be significant toxicological effects in
some species of living organisms) and,
5. Aroclors 12^4 and 1260 are the compounds which are found and reported in the literature by the Aroclor trade-names or as the "biphenyls with-predominantly 5 to 8 chlorine atoms". We believe that references to Aroclors 12*42
and 1268 (and chlorinated terphenyls) in several letters received reflect early non definitive efforts of the analysts.
DSW 164908
-2-
WATER_PCB-SD0000017977
.^j4j^i^s^//wwjn^^xom/^e_cuTe/'d3t32/Li.eht^oot/smith/im3ges/54/5444S.CPC?strict:scalf;=firwiHth;pacg,--) r<)-.ir)-o^n-^^i~j-i-- nPags 5 of 25
2. TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS
A. Mon--Data available at present indicate that PCB's may be "moderately toxic" to man. Safe industrial usage has been based on a recognition of possible
- toxic - effects and control of exposures to minimise the hazard. There have been a limited number of cases of occupational disease where workmen have been exposed to excessive vapor inhalation or repeated and prolonged skin contact with subsequent development of skin manifestations ("chloracne") or more serious involvement of the liver and kidneys.
B. Animals--Chronic toxicity data for animals (which would allow a belter extrapolation of "safety" levels for humans^ has been meager. In May, 1969 chronic (two year) feeding studies in rats and dogs were initiated'at our consultant's Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories in Chicago. A three generation
. rat reproduction study is also underway. ~ Tne purpose of the research is to make available to the U. S. Pood and Drug Administration and other-federal and state agencies data which wll-1-confirm that the levels of PCbfs being found in nature--and particu larly in human food--do not constitute a serious threat to the public health.
C. Fish--The proven presence of pesticides (and PCB's) in fish is beginning to cause concern for two reasons. In Sweden and other Scandinavian countries where fish make up a large portion of the daily diet, the use of DDT has been temporarily or permanently banned. Similiar action has been taken in several ,, states in the United States and bills have been . presented in Congress to outlaw the sale and use. of DDT. This summer the U. S. Food and Drug Adminis tration seized and destroyed Coho Salmon caught in Lake Michigan because of DDT content.
This highlights the particular problem with fish which can concentrate/accumulate persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons in their tissues. For example, trout raised in water containing 1 part per billion wi 11 contain 1 part per million in their tissues in six weeks. Other marine species exhibit a similax' "con centrating'1 propensity. Although no scientist has
) maintained that these accumulated levels in fish are
toxic per se, the question of the desirability of having such fish in the human diet has caused concern-- and in some minds, alarm.
_q_
DSW164909
wATER_PCB-SD00000 17978
Jnfodpx.com./s8cure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images/54/54446.CPC?strict:scale=fitwidth;page=Idbid=smithdbid=srtPag^ 5 of 25
BanBaram
TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS (Continued)
A second consequence of the chlorinated pesticide presence in fish, is the alleged effect on species of coastal and other fish-eating birds. There is evidence interpreted by a number of scientists {and seized upon by the conservationlat-pseudo-scientists) that several species of birds face elimination or absolute extinction because of persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons in fish which make up the major portion if not all of their diet. Included in the United States are the Peregrine Falcon and the brown pcli~ can. (At a meeting in October, 1969> of the Associ ation of Official Analytical Chemists, will be a paper presented entitled, "The Determination of PCB's in Two Bald Eagles". This is based on work done by the Fish and Wildlife Laboratories of the U. S. Department of the Interior at Patuxent, Maryland. Now the emblem of the heritage of the
United States is threatenedi)
D. Birds--The effect in birds appears to be due to an upset of enzyme metabolism in the liver leading to the laying of eggs with thin or no shells at all. On Anacapa Island, near Oxnard, California, only
three of one thousand brown pq^can eggs were found this year with shells and only^bird was born. 'This-was due allegedly to anchovies:--the main diet -of the pelican-containing "DDT and hundreds of parts per million of PCB's".
Preliminary results from studies at Industrial Bio
Test Laboratories indicate that 100 ppm of Aroclors
12*12, 125*1 and 1260 in the diet of white leghorns
causes a reduction in egg shell thickness and an
effect in chick embryos which prevents hatching.
E. Shrlmp--In August, 19&9, West Florida State Univer sity at Pensacola reported to our Pensacola Plant that PCB's (Aroclor 126*0 had been found in the Escambia River below our outfall. The amount was reported as *10-45 parts per billion one quarter mile below the plant and 1 ppb at the bridge over the river as it enters Pensacola Bay.
The Gulf Breeze Laboratories of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (U. S. Department of Interior) at Pensacola next reported that 40 ppb killed baby
Bhrimp-in 96 hours. Further study.indicated that 5 ppb killed 18 of 25 baby shrimp in 18 days.
Plant investigation revealed that one to three gallons per day of Aroclor 125**- was being lost to the river from the use of Pydraul AC in air compressors.
DSW 164910
WATER_PCB-SD0000017979
4'44S fhttps:.//.www.infocloy..corri/secure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images,/54/54446.CF>C?strigt:scala=fitwidth: Dage=ldbid=smit&dbicl=srrPags 7 >f 25
2. TOXICOLOGICAL ASPECTS (Continued)
F. Summary of Toxlcity Considerations
a. The PC131 s are "moderately" toxic to man. A probable safe level for Aroclor 1254 and 1260 in the diet will be something Jess than one
part per million.
b. A] though only "moderately'' or "slightly" toxic to adult birds and fish on the basis of acute exposure, the "safe long term" or "chronic dose"
is less than 100 ppm Insofar as reproduction is
concerned-
c. In the case of shrimp, the "safe" or no effect"
level for Aroclor 1254 is less than 5 parts per
bill5 on.
-
It thus appears that, -while we may be able to show some kind of reasonable numbers for "safe levels" of Aroclors 1254 and 1260 (and other lower chlor inated biphenyls)in some species, there are other species of life in the ecosystem where a zero to 5 parts per billion limit for Aroclor 125^1 and 1260 ;(a7rd~p'os5ibly other more highly chlorinated biphenyls) will be the tolerance level.
DSW 164911
-5-
WATER_PCB-SD0000017980
i'446 [https://ww>>.infodoy.com/secure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images/54/54446.CPC itrict:scale=fitwidth:page=ldbid=smithdbi(jgsi7Pag6 3 of ?5
3. PERSISTENCE OK LACK OF BIODEGRADATION
Evidence for the persistence of Aroclors 125*1 and 1260 in the environment .includes:
a. The chemical stability of most of the chlor
inated aromatic hydrocarbons
_
b. The identification of Aroclors 125*1 and 1260 in the environment as Itemized in Section 1.
c. Reports from Sweden indicating the presence of Aroclors 125*1 and/or 1260 or competitive equivalent products in the sludge from muni
cipal waste treatment plants.
d. The lack of data up to now indicating that
lower chlorinated PCB's are interfering in
the pesticide residue analysis in spite of the
equivalent usage of some of them (c.g. Aroclor
12*12) and undoubted losses to the environment
depending on use applications and ultimate
disposal. (Comfort in this conclusion is tem
pered by some evidence that the preparation of
samples for GC analysis--destroying the DDT
and metabolites--may be causing destruction
of Aroclor 12*J2).
`
<3. Literature evidence that other lower chlor inated hydrocarbons in a scries of compounds (e.g. mono and di-chlorophenols) are subject to biodegradation whereas increase in chlor ination makes them more refractory (pentachlorphenol).
f. Early reports of research in Monsanto's Ruabon Laboratories that indicate that Aroclor 12*12 is indeed subject to biodegradation in biological waste treatment plants (research scale).
I
DSW 164912
-6-
WATER_PCB-SD0000017981
_www.intodo);.coin/58Cure/data2/LiRhtfoot/smith/ima6s/54/54445.CPC?striet:scale=fitwidth:page=ldbid=smithdbid=ssrrr~ag& 9 of 25
4. PKHSSUHJSS WHICH will affect sales and use of aroclors 1 ?l?l' AND 12b6
As of this date {October, 1969), there are no restric tions which control the current uses .of our Aroclors or PCB'S. We are faced instead v/ith pressures being applied relative to persistent chlorinated hydrocarbon pesti cides in general and specifically DDT. The evidence proving the persistence of these compounds and their universal presence as residues in the environment is beyond question. Although the significance of these residues is subject to wide difference of opinion among reasonable scientists, the development of "lunatic fringe" post-Rachol Carson has led to a domination of _ the media by scare publications in the public and scientific press. Only the most myopic individual in the business world could be unaware of the overwhelming interest and influences being directed at preventing contamination of the environment. The principal groups wi tit an apparent avowed mission of providing a world of pristine pure food, water and air include many in aca demic and political fields who recognize the headline value of statements supporting these Ideals.
'Itt the case of the PCB's as environmental contaminants,
the committee believes that Monsanto Is faced with a
barrage'of adverse publicity in all elements of the
news media--Including those with national coverage.
Factual basis will be sparse or non-existent but quilt
by association (with DDT) will provide background and
` prevail.
.
As indicated in the earlier sections of this report, it
will be impossible to deny the presence and persistence
of Aroclors 125^ and 1260 at least. The public and
legal pressures then to eliminate or prevent global
contamination are inevitable and probably cannot be *
contained successfully.
'
In defense of the chlorinated pesticides, their manu facturers will not be loath to incriminate the PCB's as being culprits in the development of misleading data relative to their concentrations as residues. Secondly, the manufacturers of competitive products will seize any opportunity to point out to our customers their potential problems if they continue to use products con taining Aroclors. This has already occurred in the case of our Pydrauls.
There arc pertinent federal laws and regulations rela
ting to environmental control as discussed in the .
following section.
"
-7-
DSW164913
WATER_PCB-SD0000017982
_g^6JTTttBs7/wvw.intodo}!.cpm/securs/data2/ti.trhtfoot/siTiith',images/54/54446.CPC?strict:scale=fitwiclth:page=ldbld=smithdbid=sPags 10 or ?5
5. LAWS AND KRGULATTOWS CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION
A. U.S. Department or Health, Education and Welfare - Food ancT^PFurT Aclmi.nl stration
The most pertinent leg-1 elation governing the quality of human food is the 1958 Act amending the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the regulations which have been estab lished thereunder. Briefly, the requirements relate to food additives - direct and indirect, and control food production and processing to insure a supply free from bacterial contamination and unauthorised chemicals (or levels greater than established "tolerances"). The regulations also include animal feeds.
No acceptable or "cafe" levels for PCB's in human foods or animal feeds have been established. Currently, there has been no indication that the FDA is seriously concerned about the levels of PCB's which have been reported alone or in conjunction with chlorinated pesticide residues. At the came time, the PestJcide Tolerance Branch of FDA lias requested (late September) samples of Aroclors 1254 and 1260 for the expressed purpose of initiating acute toxicity studies in laboratory animals.
In the past, the FDA has not seised and- destroyed food contaminated by the unintentional or unexplained presence of "adulterants" unless there has been some basis for a judgement that the adulterant was toxic or might pose a threat to health. An exception has been milk because of its primary role in the diet of children. Seizure and destruction of milk containing any "adulteration" has not been uncommon. It can be assumed that the finding of PCB's in milk in Georgia in June and in Baltimore in September lias created a new interest in and emphasis on the PCB problem.
B. U.S. Department of Agriculture - Under lav/s and regulations governing the use of economic poisons which include insec ticides, rodenticides, fungicides, this department shares with the FDA the responsibility for establishing safe levels or tolerances for these products. It does seize and destroy meats and poultry subject to inspection under regulations controlling the processing of these foods originally those entering interstate commerce but more recently, practically all slaughtered and processed items.
As in the case of FDA, the USDA has not established any acceptable or tolerance levels for the PCB's in products subject to their control.
-8-
DSW164914
WATER_PCB-SD0000017983
^Mslhtt^s^/www.intoclox.com/secure/data?/! ighHnnf/smith//iimi ages/54/54446 CPC?strict:scalegfitwidth;Dagggldbid=smitbdbid=sPage 11 of 25
'<**** *-, .`in-
aj
t537JUw'E5?--
5. LAWS AND REGULATIONS CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION
Xcdntiniiecf) ' "
.
C U.S. Department of Interior - Federal Water Pollution
/vcirolnlGtratlon
~"
Under the provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1967, the FWPCA has to approve standards of water quality estab lished by the individual state regulatory agencies. For practical purposes, this has meant that FWPCA has set not only parameters but actual numbers for dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, solids, etc. including the broad category of "toxic" compounds. As of this date, no limits per se have been promulgated for pesticides including the chlorinated hydrocarbons. This week (October 10), a bill has been Introduced in Congress requiring the FWPCA to establish "limits" for pesti cides, Obviously this is associated with the furor
over DDT and the persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons. Hearings on the proposed legislation are expected early
in 1970 soon after the Congress reconvenes.
If is reasonable to expect that the PCD problem will be brought up at these hearings. Further, with the politicctl and public interest In all forms of environmental contam ination, it is -likely that the legislation will be broadened
to include all persistent chemicals.
D. State Legislation - In /addition to Federal legislation, all states have regulatory programs governing the adult erations of food, the contamination of intrastate and interstate waters, and the protection of fish, wildlife and natural resources. Up to this pointmost of the state government agencies which have contacted Monsanto represent water pollution control, natural resources, or agriculture areas of interest.
No states have established any "tolerance" limits for
PCB's but a number of states have banned or restricted the use of DDT and have expressed more than a casual Interest in the PCBrs. In expressing such interest, several states (and the province of Ontario) have pointed out the actions which have been taken against DDT.
DsW 164915
WATER_PCB-SD0000017984
j446Ihttpf?:'/www.infoclox.com/secure/clata2/l.igh{<oot/smith/images/54./54446.CPC?5triet:scals=fitwic!th;page=lclbid=smithdbid=sPage '2 of 25
l ) '
6. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS -
The committee recognizes that there may be a number of legal Implications including financial liability that may be in volved in the PCB problem. It believes that these should be explored thoroughly with representatives of the Law De partment and discussed apart from this report.
10 -
DSW 164916
WATER_PCB-SD0000017985
fhtip?c/wwv.,.infodps.com/seeure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images/54/54446 CPC?5trici:5cale=fitwidth:paga=l.dbid=smithdi3id=sPage 13 of 2
7. ALTERNATIVES (AND PROBABLE OUTCOME)
'
In the face of all of the circumstances, what can Monsanto do? What does the committee recommend?
First, the committee has considered several alternatives as follows:
1} Say and do nothing - making the governmental agencies prove their case against Monsanto and its customers. Let the government establish "tolerances" based on public and political pressures and any experimental or developed data which they generate.
2) Take action to create a smoke screen hoping to delay any restrictive action by governmental agencies.
3) Immediately discontinue manufacture and sale of Aroclors 1254 and 1260.
4) Discontinue manufacture and sale of all polychlorinated biphenyls.
5) Respond responsibly,, admitting that there is growing
evidence of environmental contamination by the higher chlorinated biphenyls and take action.to resolve the problem. Hopefully, such a course would postpone pre cipitous action by governmental agencies for a few months and then limit any restrictions to Aroclors 1254 and 1260. in the interim, there would: be an opportunity for a concerted effort to find and promote substitute products for these particular Aroclors and the develop ment of data to protect the continued use of lower chlorinated biphenyls such as Aroclor 1242 and the
chlorinated terphenyls.
The principal purpose of the toxicological research effort underway is to establish that "safe" or "harmless" levels can be set for mammals including man and fish. As the work progresses, it appears more and more likely that "safe" levels for birds (and thus the fish con sumed by birds) and some species in the marine environ_ ment will approach zero (shrimp-less than 5 parts per billion).
In summary, the committee believes that the probable outcome of a "responsible" course of action will show that some low levels or concentrations are "harmless" to some species in the environment. This gives Mon santo some defense. At the same time, safe levels of some of the Aroclors for some species will be such that any contamination will be harmful and must be
. , prevented.
- 11
DSW 164917
WATER_PCB-SD0000017986
/www.jnfodQ>:,com/sgcure/c{ata2/Lightfoot/smith/images/54/54446.GPC?strict:$cale=fitwidth:pag5=Idbid=smithdbid=5Page 14 of 25
7. ALTERNATIVES (AND FHOBABLE OUTCOME) (Continued)
Further, Aroclor degradation in the environment will be proven to be extremely slow with the higher chlor- inated compounds being worse in this respect.
. '
Finally, in view of the above, this course of action will dictate that we will have to restrict uses and begin a program of "clcan-up1', starting immediately.
-12-
DSW 164918
WATER_PCB-SD0000017987
54445 rhtip:s>Vwvtfv<.iniodo>:.eom/seeure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images./54-/54446.CPC?si t;?cale=fitwidth;p)3E;=ldbic{=smithdbid=sPag--= 15 of 25
8. STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS
A, The table below summarizes the approximate sales volume of the chlorinated biphenyls by product__ _ _
designation and end use:
Aroclor
Pvdraul
Sales for Aroclors in Millions, Pounds
Therminol Miscel, .Electrical
" "" *
PlastiTotal FLU sizer
Total
1242
4.06
1248
1.16
1254
1260
0.58
1262
1268
Others
Total --$78
1.12 1,01 0.12
--
2.24
0.30 .20 .50 T--
1.0
35.5 -0.8
3.15
.
3973%
40.98 2.37 1.45 3.73
1.1
49.6
6.6
1-35 5-37 0.42
.50 .41
.39 15.2
47.6 3.7 6.8 4.2
2.4
64.7
B. Functional Fluids Uses
In outline form, the possibility of functional fluids uses resulting in environmental contamination, possi ble courses of action and effectiveness of control action are indicated as follows;
F. Fluids
Possible Pollution by
Possible Pollution
Customer Plant Operation by Customers' Produc
Product Hydraulic Fluids
Yes, leakage external
Possible - see Johnson Motors Castings
Air Compressor Fluids Yes, leakage external
Leakage into prociuc
Heat Transfer
Yes, leakage external
Leakage into produc
Capacitor Fluids
Yes, leakage from plant In product but
- scrap materials
closed for end use-*
Transformer Fluids
No, ,Should be clean; Yes, Reworked trans
formers
In product but closed for end use*
* Capacitors can go to land fill dumps. Probably not burned, in A1 containers.
**. Need to take care of Aroclor in discarded "transformers. Product could be drained and reworked.
-13-
DSW164919
WATER_PCB-SD0000017988
j444fc fntipf://w''A'Vf.infodoy.com/secure/data2/Lightfoot/smith/images54/54446.CPC?strict:scals=fitV''idth;p3ge=ldbid=smitbdbici=sF'ags 15 of 25
6, STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS (Continued)
Probable Outcome Hydraulic Leakage
Product could be caught at machines but will take a lot of clean-up work with customers. Will have to have replacement product--with less sensitive components. Work from this base on clean-up to prevent more pollu tion problems.
Air Compressor Fluids
Di tto
Hydraulic Fluids
Must expect "shrimp1' experiments, West Florida State, to be "aired" sometime soon; next few months.
This will lead to bad publicity and competitive action vs. all Pydrauls.
We will have to try to confine to Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1260.
We will have to take action before
that time.
'
Gulf Coast-
:.
Action-~Be able to replace Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1260 in Pydraul AC and 625 in two months' time before Nov. 15, 19<39.
Have trial product in hands of Gulf Coast accounts and distributor before Dec. 15.
Suggest possible buy of "all phosphate" ester from Food Machinery. Use this as one trial fluid MCS____ for insurance.
Suggest possible substitution of Aroclor 5442 for Aroclor 1254 in tydraulic and compressor blends. E. Wheeler judges lower order of toxicity and solubility for 5442 series. Have to test product in pump test for deposits.
Suggest field trials of our own all-phosphate ester.
Work with large customers to clean-up streams. Bring in Findett as manufacturing partner in the recycle business. Get money out of recycle operation.
-14-
DSW164-920
WATER_PCB-SD0000017989
dMI!litp^MwwjfrfodoX.c0fn.-,Secure/data2/Ligh'tfoot/smith/image5/54/54446.CPC?strict:scale=fitwiclth:DagegIdbirt=;grriit-hrti->iHsPage of 25
' ' 8. STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS (Continued)
Inland-Waterways
.
Action--Be close enough to Great Lakes studies to judge situation. Are there animals which are being affected by the concentrations found?
Be prepared to replace Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1260 in four months In hydraulic fluids and in air compressor fluids.
Be prepared to replace all Aroclor 1242 or 1248 In six months in hydraulic fluids. This means replacement of Pydraul 312 series, and control " of sale of Aroclor 1248 to other hydraulic accounts such as Cities Service and Mobil.
Heat Transfer
-
Action--Systeros- will have some leakage depending strongly on engineering and maintenance. Need to work with customers on clean-up.
Need to replace FR especially in food or sensitive - product areas where the product is getting into
water. See dishwasher compounds. See letter E. Wheeler to J. Fallon.
Jrfe have possible replacement products in Therminol 55,
"" ` '
Therminol 66.
-Try to assure adequate production of Therminol 66 in face of decreased Aroclor production. H2 and terphenyl supply may become short.
Switch customers to Therminol 55
-
or Therminol 66.
,,
ahead of pollution problems'in customer's plant.
Work with customers on plant and dumping practices.
Findett already set up to rework. Need to make them a manufacturing arm. We get sale of recycle-
rework fluid.
Capacitor Fluids
Capacitor Products
Capacitor plants have repurification and
Enclosed In A1 or
recycle systems but up to 5# of product
stainless steel for
can be lost by poor plant producers and
5 to 25 year period.
off-quality material.
Will ultimately have
of production could be 1M Ibs/year.
to dispose of capaci
This is a big loss for the type of
tor products.
) pollution we are trying now to guard against.
Recommend we try to save this product for
a time.
DSW164921
-15-
WATER_PCB-SD0000017990
54446 fhttp?^7ww.inf&ao>:.com/secure/data2/Lightfoot/smtth-/images/54/5^45.CPC?strict:5
iiwidth;pag=ldbid=smithdbicj=sP3ge j.8 of 25
\. t
'-d, STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL, PRODUCTS (Continued)
Capacitor Fluids (Cont.)
Capacitor Products (Cont.
Action--Monsanto must help plant clean-up of customer plants' decantation,
coalescing, adsorption, dis posal of adsorbent or recycle of
adsorbents.
Recommend replacement of future Aroclor
business with other products. Have two years.
Monsanto badly needs "know-how" for clean-up.
Monsanto should seek government contract money for clean-up research (see MRC R. Binning,
D. Nelson).
Transformers
.
Transformer plant can operate in a clean, efficient manner with recycle of off-grade Aroclor.
Action--Should advise disposal of filter element materials so as to minimize chance of water pollution. Incinerate or dispose.
Product transformers can remain closed and no exposure for 25 years,
'
Reworked transformers pose a threat if the Aroclor is dumped into a water stream.
Should try to minimize chance of dumping "old" fluid by re working and by educating company shops and collecting product for rework or dlsposal.
Dalton is set up in England to rework electrical grade fluid.
Should try to retain business by clean-upj by education of cus tomers.
.
Need rework facility here and disposal scheme.
'
Monsanto Plants
The Department of Interior and/or state authorities could monitor plant outfall and find ppm of chlorinated biphenyls at Krummrioh or Anniston anytime they choose to do so. This could shut us down depending on what plants or animals they choose to find harmed.
-16-
DSW 164922
WATER_PCB-SD0000017991
:smithdbici=sP3ss iq nf 7^.
0. STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS (Continued)
Monsanto Plants (Cont.) _
Action-~Takc steps to see that every precaution is taken to prevent Aroclor entering water streams. Try to reduce to ppb level.
Seek a government contract on adsorption and incineration cycles--MRC.
Take samples of streams and river water and mud
evidence for before and after clean-up. Samples can be stored for further analysis if we can't keep up current with, analytical determinations.
Apply Monsanto clean-up methods to customer plant clean-up equipment and procedures.
Evaluate liquid incinerators vs. solids handling incinerators for disposing of Aroclor and pentachlorohenol wastes. Estimated Aroclor disposal
at 1~4m lbs/year, exclusive of cleaning up river bottoms or outfall bottoms.
Hydraulics Heat Transfer Capacitors Transformers.
20$ of 4m Ib.s. 10$ of 2M lb's, .5$ of 20M 5^ of 1'5M
800,000 lbs. 200,000 lbs.
3,000,000 lbs.
750,000 lbs. 2,750,000 lbs.
Set up an incinerator to handle Aroclor disposal-preferably one which will handle solids such as muds--slurries as well as liquids. Have, in operation within 12 months. Ideally have incin erators available different sections for disposal.
Chronic Toxicity Studies--Indus trial Blo-Te sjfc
Action-~Confcinue studies to establish FDA typo limits of
toxicity on Aroclor 12^2, Aroclor 125^ and *
Aroclor 1260.
-
Rework with R. ICeller-S. Tucker the number of
samples which are to be analyzed for Aroclor in
tissue. Try to see if Aroclors are changed
metabolically. Does concentration level off,
decline if feeding is stopped?
.
4
'
Institute studies against the most limiting
biological parameters. If shrimp are the most
limited species for Aroclor levels of toxicity,
then we will have to have biological studies
on these species to confirm or deny adverse
findings.
-17-
DSW164923
WATER_PCB-SD0000017992
i^MJfat|B;^Z!iSiflK^jodoy..com/5ecure/da^^yg^tfoot/siTi[th/irnaj;e5/54/54446.CPC?5triet:scalesfitwic}th:page=lclhirl=cmihHiiw_
8. STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS (Continued)
Biodegradetion Studies
'
Action--Set up rate of biodegradation studies with Inor ganic Division on Aroclor 12*1? vs. Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 5442 vs. Aroclor 5460 ChlorinaLed diphenyl ether
Chlorinated paraffin vs. chlorinated naphthalene Chlorobromo Aroclors 12*12 and 1248
`
Contact Baxter and Lidgett at MCL regularly for results on Aroclor degradation. They are reported to be moving on laboratory experiments.
Establish contact with chlorophenol degradation studies of Cellu-Chcm Group.
~ C. Plasticizer Uses
Analysis of chlorinated biphenyl uses as plasticizers (1968 figures) is as follows (provided by C. Paton,
. 3/25/69)
1. No_carbon requlred paper
NCR: 6. OM pounds Aroclor 1242
Until mid-1968, only NCR plant was at Dayton, Ohio. There is now a plant at Portage, Wisconsin on stream.
2. Pi stributors
Our distributors resold 4.5M pounds chlor inated biphenyls in 1968. It is Impossible to pinpoint all uses. I estimate surface coatings is the bigges.t market.
3. Hot Molt Adhesives
DuPont at Parlin, New Jersey uses 460 M" pounds (mainly Aroclor 1248) In a hot melt adhesive for bookbinding.
4. Sealants
Aroclors are used in polysulfide sealants
(automotive windscreen sealant and light
construction, e.g., window sealants). 1968
sales were 1.4m pounds (Aroclor 1240/Aroclor
1254). Our largest customers are Products
Research at Burbank, California and Gloucester
City, Pennsylvania (680 M pounds) and Sonneborn
in New Jersey (225 M pounds).
.
DSW 164924
WATER_PCB-SD0000017993
g^S^aS^^:ifrfod^om/5ecure/data2/Lightfopt/smith/ima^s^54446.CPC?strict:scale^iMidth:page=idbid=smithclbiri=<=pao ige 21 of 25
)
8. STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS (Continued)
5. Adhesives
Rubber adhesives, etc. accounted for 0.8 M pounds in 1968 of which 400 M pounds went to 3~M.
6. Coatings
In 1968, we sold 1.3 M pounds on a direct basis to this market. Our biggest direct customers In this_market is Sherwin-Williams (Cleveland) at l40 M pounds and Koppers (Pittsburgh/Newark) at 250 M pounds.
7 Miscellaneous
Approximately 0.7 M pounds chlorinated biphenyls are used in miscellaneous applications as fire retardant additives, wax compounds, etc.
1968 sales of chlorinated biphenyls were:
NCR Distributors Bight Major Customers A11 Others
6.0 M pounds
4.5 2.5 2.2 _ 15*2 M pounds
By market, 3968 sales were: -
NCR Distributors
Sealants Coatings Adhesives Hot Melt Adhesives Mlscellaneous
6.0 M pounds
4.5 1.4
1.3 0.8
0.5 0.7 15*2 M pounds
' - D. possibility of Contamination from Plasticizer Uses
With the exception of the use of the higher chlorin ated biphenyls in rubber based paints for swimming pools and water storage tanks, it is more difficult
to pinpoint end uses that would permit ''direct'! contamination of the aquatic environment than is the case with functional fluid uses. "Indirect1' contamination could occur from the eventual leaching . . of the Aroclors from the final-disposal or ultimate end point of any product containing them. For example, highway marking paints obviously have a short life. It may be presumed that such paints containing Aroclors eventually end up in the drain age areas for the highways and provide a continuing source of PCB's to the limit of their solubilities.
Similarly, any Aroclor containing products which end
-19-
DSW 164925
WATER_PCB-SD0000017994
-iniodox.eom/secure/data?/i iPhtino*/;nith/imag6S^54/54446.CPC?strict:seale=fitwiflth-nagPg page-1 db;d=smitpdbiri=.';p.a-: ge 22
2? if
)hVv
STATUS OF INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTS (Continued)
up ultimately in refuse dumps or land fill operations are possible sources. -
_ Several scientists alarmed about the marine envir-
* onment contamination have theorized that any PCB's
which get into the atmosphere from processes invol
ving plastieizer uses or the incomplete incineration
of waste pro'ducts containing PCB's eventually end up
in the sea because of "rain-out". This then could
involve nearly all of the plasticiser uses other
than coatings.
'
E. The Chlorinated Terphenyls
Up to this point there have been only scattered re ports that these compounds are present in the envir onment and/or are- Interfering with the analysis of chlorinated pesticide residues. There are at least two possible explanations.*
1. Due to extremely 1ow solubility, they are
- _ not being dispersed as are the chlorinated
biphenyls; -and
2. The retention times in the GC analytical techniques are so great that their peaks
don't interfere with the identification of DPT, its metabolites and the other chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides. This explanation implies that they may be pre sent but are not being identified.
Hopefully, if they are eventually identified and their presence confirmed, we will be able to provide data that they are sufficiently biologically ''inert" for man, animals and all species in the ecosystem that
they present no problem.
-20-
DSW 164926
WATER_PCB-SD0000017995
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
Prom the specific recommendations indicated In Section 8, pages 13 to 20 as they relate to individual Aroclors and their uses, the following general recommendations have been developed:
A. immediately assign full time at least three individuals for a period of at least three months to an "emergency" task force to implement the action indicated by the specific recommendations referred to above and those which follow.
B. In view of legal and moral considerations, notify all Aroclor 1254 and 1260 customers of environmental con tamination problem and their possible involvement.
C. Reduce losses of Aroclors in liquid wastes from Monsanto plants to minimum. Goals for Aroclors 1254 and 1260 0 to 10 parts per billion.
- D, Consult with appropriate federal agencies' headquarters in Washington to determine current status of concern and to inform appropriate individuals therein of Mon santo's research and control efforts.
E. Personally contact all governmental and university lab oratories which have requested Aroclor camples and in dicated interest in the environmental contamination problem.
P. Determine extent of atmospheric losses from Aroclors from Anniston and WGK Plants and develop plans for and install control.
G. Analyze in Organic Division laboratories (or by contract) selected appropriate samples from:
(1) Environment of Anniston and WGK Plants.
(2) Monsanto products where contamination is possible.
(3) Agencies and/or laboratories attempting to pinpoint ' - specific sources of contamination.
(4) Customer plants' environments. **
(5) Research efforts involved in biological studies-i.e. animal, bird and fish toxicity studies and biodegradation studies.
-21-
DSW 164927
WATER_PCB-SD0000017996
ffitip%://www.iniotiox.com.'securfc/claia2/Lightfoot/smitiVirriages/54/5444b.CPC?siri :3ie=fitwiclth:p3ge=i-dbid=smithdbid=aPag6 24 of 21
i
9. RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued)
H. Establish a special budgetary account to allow im-
plementation of these recommendations and the con tinuation of the toxicological research effort now underway and continuing until June, 1971. The pro
blem involves not only Research whose budget has born the major costs to date. It is a joint problem
involving also sales, and production or manufacturing.
The budget for the remainder of 1969 and 1970 should include:
(1) Costs of 3-man task force for six months - in
cluding travel ............................................................ $40,000
(2) A continuing 3-man effort In the analytical
area. (At present there is the equivalent
of one and a half men)................................
$55,000
(3) * Toxicological research and biological degradation studies. ......................................... . $125,000
'
Sub Total
$220,000
(4) Development of substitute products
. * In connection with the toxicity research, developments during the next 3 to 6 months may dictate that some studies be dis continued in mid-1970 because the results may be meaningless in terms of preventing loss of business.
-C30-
OSW164923
WATER_PCB-SD0000017997
fhttos:/'1 ww'vy.infodox.com/secure/data2/Light>oot/smith/iinags5/54/5d445.CPC?striet:scals=fitwidth;page=3dbidgsmittidbid=sPagc-25
10. SUMMARY
1. The committee has concluded that the identification of PCB's as an environmental contaminant is certain.
2. Toxicity to some biological species at extremely low levels (a few parts per billion) is significant.
3. The PCB's are persistent once they become a part of the environment and the rate of degradation is extremely low. There is little likelihood that the PCB's appear in the environment as a result of "natural" origin on the metabolism or degradation of other chlor inated hydrocarbons.
-23-
DSW1B4929
WATER_PCB-SD0000017998