Document g230J7yX13mJmmDkqRBNpE0v3
FILE NAME Corning OC DATE 1966 Aug 8
DOC OC024
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Memo RE Kaylo Dust - Bath Iron Works
Dola August 8 1966
Kevin
e
with
Ed
Z
Kaylo is principally a calcium silicate matrix with a range
of 12 to 18 asbestos intermix
Calcium silicate is not considered a health hazard but does create dust when cut or sawed
Asbestos is recognized as a health hazard causing asbestosis
Asbestosis requires 12 years or more of exposure to cause objective
The threshold limit value set by the A.C.G.I.H. is 5 million
_ symptoms
particles per cubic foot
However Dr. Selikoff has stated that only
medical
one fiber in the body can cause cancer In the past few years
teams have examined the lung tissue of citizens of JohanannedsbfuorugndSt.haAt
Miami Florida and Pittsburgh Pennsylvania at autopsy
30 to 47 had asbestos bodies in the lungs None of these people were
known to have worked in the asbestos industry or mines Dr. Selikoff
claims that the urban atmosphere is full of asbestos fibers emanating
from asbestos floor tiles and shingles auto brake drums etc. The
cannot believe that such a wide asbestos fiber dis-
atsrbiebsuttoison inisdusptorsysible and they are pointing the finger at other fibers
as the more probable cause of asbestos bodies
Asbestos bodies sometimes develop into mesotheliomas a tumor with considerable carcinogenic potential
Because of asbestosis if for no other reason asbestos fibers should be removed from the atmosphere by adequate ventilation If ventilation is impossible suitable respirators should bethw eor An .C.bGy.Iw.oHr.kmtehnreshold At this point I believe there is reason to question
limit
School T.L.V.
Haward The correspondence does not indicate what readings the
of Public Health has obtained from their air samplings or what they approved We should recommend good ventilation and
respirators
cutting
It is impossible to guess the amount
sawing etc. of Raylo There are too
of dust created by
many local factors
the in-
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT
OCF
'
Mr. J. M. Briley
-2-
?
August 8 1966
volved Bath Iron Works is attacking the problem correctly by consulting with Harvard whose recommendations must be accepted
products
etc.
Again I suggest that we consider the labeling of our Kaylo in the same general way that M labels their Thermobestos
situation
I will be after you
glad
have
to write
approved
a letter to A. S. Kevlin about this approach to the matter
this
FHE
F. H. Edwards
256256