Document ew4q9y4jnJ67qOeVR2z4jJVq

DownloadSearchable PDFRandom document
FILE NAME: Fluor (FLU) DATE: 1964 DOC#: FLU003 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Worker's Compensation Docket 1 WORKxRS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD 2 STATE O F CALIFORNIA 3 JACQUELINE CLANCY, a s p a r t y ap plican t in her in d iv id u a l capaci 4 and as p e r s o n a l r e p r e s e n ta t iv e and n e x t o f k in o f (Leo J .S t r e it h o r s t , 5 deceased), Applicant 6 vs. 7 WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY, e t a l , and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE, 8 FUND, e t a l , C ase N o . 6 0 S F 1 9 2 -1 4 5 certification 9 Defendant 10 11 I hereby c e r t if y th a t th e a ttach ed docum ents are tru e 12 and c o r r e c t c o p i e s o f t h e o r i g i n a l d o cu m en ts f i l e d i n t h e r e c o r d s 13 o f t h is o f fic e in the a b o v e-en title d m atter. 14 ATTEST my hand and t h e S e a l o f t h e W o rk ers' C o m p en sa tio n 16 A p p eals Board o f th e S ta te o f C a lif o r n ia . 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 D ated a t San F ra n cisco , 25 C a l i f o r n i a , t h i s -*-6t h <jay 26 of April, 1984. 27 F ||9 D ) A, W C A l orm i N CW l-71> DB P A JITM 1N T O F IN D U r f t f 4 l * C l* T 'Q B OIVtBfOWor INDUiTHIALACCtMK ir ir w n ii I Ik. a& O EM IT T O : p.o. box UDIB san francisco ca 54101 C4I55 B B 4 .3 0 6 S LEGAL DOCUMENT DUPLICATING SERV ICE V PERTAINING T:l . J . STREITHORST /I WORKER rS COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD SAN FRANCISCO R ev ised 7-17->2 - gh + / v S t r e l t h o r a t , 3P 1 9 2 -lU _______ ; OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD________ S W ^ ^ Q ) DA "S' J) S>1 m 3 LIEN CLAIMANT , * $ *<] C3 D epartm ent o f Employment P. 0 . Box 1857* Oakland v. y iv J / APPLICANT . v V/ X , 'T i i *- U s i 3 ir c iv n O r > V 't y ~N *" 1 1 1 5 1 0 S k e w 'S '*' Vc** 4 w>A.iT--T--O--RN--E--Y~S~~*F--OR- 1A1rPPLICANT Sm ith, P a r r ish , Paduck i C lancy 501 F in a n c ia l Center B ldg Oakland IP / V J V V EMPLOYERS <Z>13> n, / *- - W estern A sb estos C o / ' ' ' i*, Z s P la n t A s b e s to s Co. Vc i -n j P lu o r M a in te n a n c e CO. < r-i-to t `i aj ; l j ' * o7$ Townsend S t . , S .P . 3 1300 - 64th S t..E m ery v ille t/ . ' y 4 06 Ward S t . , M a r t in e t F u o r M a in te n a n c e Co* P. 0. Box 22, Los A ngeles C. ? . B raun & Co* J v A rm strong Cork Co. 1000 S . Frem ont Ave, Alhambra 304 Shaw R d .,S o . S .P . V WV V/ v/ / v/ J J J J / k" 1 / 7 -* V v 7 v' V 7 ' ' * ' V \ r\ \ r : f f l } O w e'if'Leiiiio, dba San J o se Asbe3 to a Co. 1 1 4 0 Lennon Way, San J o s e 7V San <Jso 3 e A s b e s t o s Co. 1 1 4 0 te n n o n Way, San J o s e k- 1 *>. . . . . . * ` L '> "Tnan. iy p n n n ------ AOR. Mi n n e a n f s C4- " "U V (,* F i b e r g l a s E n g. S= S u p p ly W v . 1200 - 17th S t ., S .F . 1 rj .V (y ( O ; J . T. Thorpe Co. 1351 Ocean A v e., E m ery v ille v' * 7* l t n d e t Cork Corp. 440 Brannan S t ., s .F . ^ M etal Clad I n s u la tio n Co. <S? ^ '> Aetna S te e l Products Gsrp. <2) Van A r sd a le k K a r r is Co. <} rW w Bay C i t i e s A s b e s to s Co. -~t-to 21759 W estern, Torrance ' *4 (. - - 6l B roadw ay, New Y ork, N .Y . $95 Tunnel A ve., s.F . 1. F i f t h Ave tc E. 1 2 th S t , O akland A tla s H eating * V e n tila tin g 357 - 4th S t .. S .F . 7 M. V. K e llo g g Co. Foot o f D anforth Ave. V J NJ x/ V w- ` 1s/ V* 7 7 f7 * Vn '' ^ V~ tj < V L it ? i;'' 7 ! 4 lei r R ev ised 7 - 17-62 - gh S t r e i t h o r s t , SP 1 9 2 -1 4 5 OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD INSURANCE CARRIERS (?).. S t a t e Comp. I n s , Fund 325 O oldn C ate A v e ., S .P . jry-, , , , . 1. / (l ` i - ' 1 Vo> Ddugt r l a 4 - Ind<wnnlty--Co. ------ 350 GCHrH30W>C fVvj' S aP i SERVICE AND DA'. v i1t \ W if s/V X 1- f r G<~; Cont in ven tal Ciawal ty^Co^------ ^ -A w aglean -M otorletB -Ing.-- Co^-- / - ............ . - </ . . -1 / fT) T r a v elen a -In B U ra n o Co-, -- /) 1 7 -Montgomery S t . . ,--S^-F. 1956- V o b a ter St- O a k la n d -IS fO S ta n d a r d -A o o l-f-In n . Ca. 433 -Cbl-l-f-orola S t i t S .P . . ___ _ -f - * - * 7s> HaWwar-o Mutual Goa Co,---- 0 0 B a t t e r y - S t . --SrP- 6- k ' /_ .. -< Argonaut-InouPQnoe--<>>r --------- 010 Sanoonte S t-o --QtFr 6 - ^ A etna Caa. 4 S u r. Co. ( ^ - P a c i f i c Em ployera I n . Cb. 220 M ontgomery S t . . S .P . 6 244 Pine S t .. S .P . 4 .. J - _ 'J 7W V--jj--^---'- 1 0O H artford ,Aool/-I. I n 4 .-C o .-- 7-9U -C alifornia Q t,. S;P- () In d u stria l Ind. Bxch, ' ^1-%* * ^ ^' / / 350 Sansone StT, S .P . 6 ________ l Jv ^ j ATTORNEYS POR INSURANCE CARRIER.^ ^ Qs (iy & Hanna 4 Brophy 1540 San F abio Ave,. Oakland ^ -- ---------------------------- '~G l r r . j . v ; ; r r , 7 -- ~~ Sedgw ick,D etert,M oran 4 IOO Bush S t . , S .P . 4 A rnold, By T .P .N led erm u ller cP , ., < Jam es J . Vonk s^r . < -J w i i ti 1 1l i s i r-- -- , j / J , -t t * : L ^ Howard C l i f f a , M ullen 4 P llip p l j. ^%ehn x , v i ik e 315 Konttoomerv S t . S .P - 4 i --" L 4 - * i v / / `4 i ------ . - 1 - S r o b so lt, P h le g e 1 -KariHhson Bari R ina Id o- f le l a r o w li- J r ; U l - C u tte r o c . ) Si Pt -4 K- ^1 K V R e v is e d U- 27-60 - gh S t r a l t h o r a t , SF 1 9 2 -1 L 5 o f f ic ia l ADDRESS RECORD SERVICE AND DATS I 'iSDRAKCS CARRIERS S t a t e Corto In s Fund x t-- tt- n - k * _1 I n d u s t r l a l-IndteFinl U -C o -. , __ _ " ' fc C ontirm uqtaj--C *#uel t y C o . -- /i> 4 /I- l **-<( Any}o.n-v.otoiMafco-Int (7/_ Trt>vol<ro-7noui-ncfr-Co. >U,,, / /' ' ' -vi _ Si-arvdo r-d-Ae-ei-dart t--I n< i't -- /l-v i-tl v EA.naw.ara - M utual C a i. Co . - A ^ on a ^ V -IivgtH^&noa--Cn-r _|Actna C a s u a lty !c S u r e t y Co, X --1 P a c i f i c E m p loyers I n a . Co ^ - ^ ^ t f o r d, Aar i .--fr -In d , -Co 1,1i T1 1 Xndui 25 G olden Gate A v o .. SF - 350 Sanson e 'S t ; .S s . . *C8~^*ifo~nni a --S t y --o j F * t# - m a i 31-lfontpowry **t s F>^i E)eH -forrrl a --9 t 9 yP . -gq Bat U r y S t , S ,F , j&JrD--S-ftn Boma S t . S . I^ '6 2g0 Montgowory 3 t , S .F , 6 21i P in a S t . S .P . Lt . 720..Ca l l r o3im t*. g t r - S-.F . / / v/'V J '.-L-.inr ^ ?0Rr?5YS POR I'rSURARCE CARRIERS f W 1S-HSL J , ; if . ^ .1 /- 4 .C .? - ' ` rr f .C A * / *n -- :f- ^7 x r. j'i i UM'*;.; --- n'!r*'.--( )_i "i*1'1'- -*i' ' r -- -irr'i `` r-v ' i... "Tin' i" -'i,`'n1..... .................................... ^ o f f ic ia l a d d ress r ec o r d SERVICE AND PATE o 3 i 5 1 a PANEL ONE 3 4 JACQUELINE CLANCY, aii p a r ty a p p lic a n t ..n h er In d iv id u a l 5 c ip a c lty a- d ao personal r 'p resen ts lv e and next o f k in l> M o ' Leo J . . f c r e lt h o r o t, d eced en t i. 7 1|- A pplicant 3 L; Tfl J 3 I,WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY, e t a l , and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE 1 0 i1 11 i3; 12 1 D efen dan ts CASE NO, t 6o SP 1 9 2 -1 * 5 ORDER OP DISMISSAL 23 14 ? 15 i T h is c a se was returned to th e ca len d a r f o r fu r th e r 16 ' h e a r in g by O rder o f th e C onm iesion f i l e d May 1 9 , 196k . r 17 On J u ly 3 0 , 13 > i 19 i;,s lo n r e q u e s t in g t h a t t h e a p p li c a t io n f i l e d by a p p lic a n t b e d i s 20 m is s e d , r 21 OOOD CAUSE APPEARING TKEREPOR: 22 1 23 r5 ,1 ij 24 l. os IT 1 3 ORDERED t h a t t h e A p p lic a tio n f i l e d h e r e in INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION np THE OTATE AP f*Af.TPAEMTA i .iw w /..'n v w m t ig'iiiiwj B TO RE T IE INDUST UAL ACCI DENT COMNIISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ."A IX -L IN E CLANCY. a s p a r ' y a p p l i c a n t in No. tO o ? 1?2-I*45 . t h-.-r ; n d i \ i d u a l c a j i d t y an c a s p e r s o n a l r ;r e s s n + :tJve anc next o f k in o f l - c J . Si -e lth c r st d eced ere, Applicant MINUTES OF HEARING ( continued ) ar.d i/i. ORI&K IL E X '; 0 .O FF CALENDAR " -- v . .? e x .j x c t c j z ,u.PAirY, l * i , ar.d t o t s oci e n s a t io n in s u h a u c fu n d , a .ina ca; aj.ty & : m z n coi paly, P ./JIF IC J '.PLGYSR3 KSURANCl COMPANY, co i l , Defendant Place and Time: San F r a n c is C r , J u ly 3 0 , 1 S $ 4 , 1 0 :0 0 a . a . Referee: Reporter: JOHN' 10 N PATE.ISON Appearance: A p p lic a n t n o t p r e s e n t; r e p r e s e n te d by Srr.ith, P a r r is h , Pddv'. : U. C lo n e :/, A tt o r n e y s ( J o s h Z . E n ith a p p e a r in g ) . D efer. ia n t 3 t a i ; Corr.f.enC'jLion Ir. . `.r a n e e F'ur.'j r';[.rc:.-.e,tcd oy x ford E l .li p ,A t t o r n e y . D efer Jant A etr., C a s u a lty ^ Sure "y Corf, any r r*.-t e n t U C'jfl.'v c k , D .-t'-rt , Y'.rar- *' Arr.' <J, At to : r e y .: , ( i.v ; c lo r e P . L loX rir. j l l v r . r.aVi-.i; a s p e c i a l a p p e a r a n c e ). D e f e r .ia n t P a c .'f lc E - p lo y e r s Jr,c rar.c-r X T i t y re; r o j t n t e d by K u lle n (e F I l i p c i , A t 'o r n e y s <3onr. R. Tno"! '".r. ' r r e & r in g ). D efen la n t I n d u s tr ia l Inconni ty Jr-.ri.ny, I n d u s tr ia l Jod er.n ity E x c h a n g e , r e p r e s e n t e d by J a ck E. G o ch k in , A t t o r n e y . 3 0 0 D CAUSE APPEARIN'j THEREFOR, IT I S ORDERED T h X t h : 3 o o v e _ e n t i t i e d t e t t e r ce and t h e u a re h e r e b y i s ta k e n o f f c -.lo r .d e r , er.d a l l f^ r t'n e r A e t ic n on t h e r a t t e r s now rer.d 'n tf h e r e in 2--: vne-d, a /c.'-.-ct t o t-tin ? f e . o e t , a f ' e r n o t i c e , upon r e q u e s t o f any o f :.e r a r - tie a h e r e t o . 3 E-.VICR o f t.h e O r - d : r t a k i n g o f f c a l e n d a r J o a i v e - j . " tIIt vYXr , xCila:: T?rr -'c r e D e fe n d a n t P a c i f i c Em ploy ar.'- Ir-.3-.r--. nee Cor..: :.n y ru de s o - v - f a l r c .tlc r .3 , c o u n s e l .tan been i n s t r u c t .d to r i t ther in v r i t i n i j . 4- ^ S '* ** . - , . - . , ^ , % * > - - I f * f o r r ,t RECEIVED 1 J lIN8 - 1954 BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION JKOUS.T.t..l.A..l....A.C..CIDENT T commjesjom U I .-VNViJi -f?ICf 3 A OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO,. 6 0 SF 192-11; liiiTnT tf ihjxu or iKiiiu iL cuun f il e d 5 L . J . STREITHORST, JUN *-1964 6 A pplicant, 7 vo, 8 V.'ZSTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY, e t a l # and STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE 9 FUND, AETNA CASUALTY L SURETY COMPANY, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS 10 INSURANCE COMPANY, e t a l , PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION 11 D efendants. 12 13 STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, a d e fe n d a n t h e r e i n , 14 p e t i t i o n s f o r r e c o n s id e r a t i o n o f th e ORDERS .(V a c a tin g O rder o f 15 D is m is s a l) ( S u b s t it u t in g P arty A p p lic a n t) and (R etu rn in g to 18 C alendar) upon th e fo llo w in g grounds: 17 1 , That by such O rders, the C ox-ission acted w ithout 18 and in e x c e s s o f I t s pow ers. 19 2 , That tne evidence does not ju s tify the Findings o f 20 P a c t , 21 STATEMENT OF TIG CASE 22 The a f o r e s a i d ORDERS, b y w h ich t h i s d e fe n d a n t h as b e e n 23 a g g r ie v e d , w ere d a te d (and p rcsucusb ly .r.ade} Kay 1 2 , 1964 and 24 r e c e iv e d by t h i s d e fe n d a n t on May 2 0 , 1 9 6 4 . May 1 2 , 19 6 4 v;as 25 some se v e n days p r io r to th e d a te on v.hlch t h is d e fe n d a n t's 26 ANSWER TO PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION a n d /o r MOTION TO SET CONTENTIONS In ad dition to the contentions se t forth In defendant's sa id Answer and in co rp o ra ted h e r e in , t h is d efen dan t str o n g ly con ten ds th a t your Honorable Commission erred in th e e x e r c is e o f J u r i s d i c t i o n i n t h e making o f s a id OUTERS, Defendant a lso contends th at there Is in eq u ity in s e ttin g aside d ism issa l o f only certain defendants w hile allow ing p rio r d ism issa ls to stand unvacated. This i s not sta tin g that I t would have been J u s t and e q u ita b le to v a ca te a l l d is m is s a ls , but m erely In em phasis o f the u n ju stlc e in v a ca tin g any o f the d ism issals. DISCUSSION A p p lic a n t's hybrid p e t itio n (in le g a l contem plation) was e ith e r a P e titio n fo r R econsideration or a P e titio n to Reopen. I t met th e req u irem en ts o f n e it h e r . la b o r Code S e c tio n 5903 s e t s fo r th th e grounds upon which a p e t i t i o n f o r r e c o n s id e r a t io n may be made and f u r t h e r p r o v id e s "and no o t h e r g r o u n d /." A p p lic a n t's p e t itio n did not m ention a B ingle one o f any such grounds and cannot v a lid ly be tr e a te d as a p e t it i o n Tor recon sid eration . Assuming th a t a p p lica n t intended h is p e t it io n as one to re o p e n , Labor Code S e c t io n s 5803 and 5805 th e n ap p ear t o be th e governing p r o v is io n s supplem ented by the Comm ission's R ules o f P r a c tic e and Procedure (S e ctio n 10 7 1 1 ), S ectio n 10711 f said ru les requires that p e titio n s to been th e " E xecutrix o f th e E state" o f the d eceased em ployee co n stitu te good cause to reopen. Anderson v b . S u p erior C ourt, 187 C a l. 95 shows th a t: "IT IS THE DUTY OF THE PERSONAL REPRESENTA TIVE OF A DECEASED PLAINTIFF TO HAVE PEND ING LITIGATION BROUGHT TO TRIAL WITHIN THE STATUTORY PERIOD." L aches and la c k o f d ilig e n c e f o r o v er 18 months can h a rd ly be an excu se fo r good ca u se. A lthough th e C oncussion has sta te d i t s b e lie f th a t th e d eced en t's h e ir s should not be p en a lized because o f th e fa ilu r e o r I n a b ility o f em ployee's a tto r n e y s to a s c e r ta in and a d v ise th e Commission o f h is d ea th , su ch a t t o r n e y s by l e t t e r o f O c to b er 0 , 1962 a d v is e d th e Commis sio n th a t th e em ployee " ...h a s been con fin ed to B rookside H osp ital s e r io u s ly i l l and w ill be unable to atten d the h earin g on O c to b er 1 1 , 1962." The man d ie d FOUR DAYS a f t e r th e d a te schedu led fo r h ea rin g and the a tto r n e y s , Beven days b efo re th e d e a t h , knew t h a t t h e man wa's i n t h e named h o s p i t a l . The d e c e d e n t' s e x e c u tr ix had a duty to have th e pending l i t i g a t i o n b ro u g h t w it h o u t w a it in g 18 m onths t o make an a p p e a r a n c e . In p a s s in g , two item s are w orth m entioning: 1 . The f a t a ll y d e fe c tiv e p e t it io n shows n e ith e r th a t J a cq u elin e C lan cey q u a lifie d n o r, i f so> i s B t i l l a c tin g aa an E x e cu tr ix . N otw ith stan ding th e op en ing paragraph o f sa id p e titio n i t nowhere even s ta te s th a t she i a daughter or h e ir o f the decedent. 2 . T here i s n o t even an attem p t to show an excu se f o r th e a tto m e V R f n llu lN . t o -Mn i l v nhlan*- *-r\ 1-K. VI..*- T-- * 1 a c tio n and co n clu d es th e r ig h ts o f th e p a r t ie s in th a t 2 p a r tic u la r a c tio n ; Dowling v s . P olack, 18 C al. 626. A d is - ` 3 m issa l fo r d ela y in o r want o f p ro se cu tio n i s n ot a Judgment 4 on th e m erits but r a th e r a r e fu sa l to h ear and d eten n in e on 5 the m e r its; B e ll v s . Solom ons, 162 ca l 1 0 5 . B u t, such a d is 6 m issa l d ep riv es th e cou rt o f J u r isd ic tio n to h ear o r determ ine 7 any m otion u n r e la te d to th e d ism issa l; Lord vs Garland (19^6) 8 27 C a l .2d 8*K). 9 Once l o s t , J u r i s d i c t i o n cannot be r e g a in e d ev en by 10 s t i p u l a t i o n o f t h e p a r t i e s ; Sauer v s . S u p e r io r C o u r t, 7 1 11 C a l.A p p .58O. 12 A sid e from t h e pow er c o n fe r r e d by S e c t io n *t73 o f t h e Code 13 o f C iv il P roced u re, th e t r i a l cou rt cannot v a ca te i t s d e c is io n , 14 once i t la made, on grounds o f j u d ic ia l e r r o r . Thua, where the 15 re co r d shows t h a t th e r e I s no mere m ista k e o r in a d v e r te n c e on 16 th e p a rt o f th e t r i a l c o u r t, and th a t an ord er o f d is m is s a l 17 vaB th e o rd e r in te n d e d to be made, an a p p e lla te c o u r t w i l l n o t 18 v a c a t e t h a t o r d e r ; Hunt v s . U n ite d A r t i s t s (19*4-7) 79 C al,,A pp.2d 19 619, 625. 20 In th e in s t a n t m a tter, th ere had been se v e r a l N o tic e s o f 21 In ten t to D ism iss and q u ite ob viously the a ctu a l D ism issa ls 22 w ere n o t made by m ere' m is ta k e o r in a d v e r t e n c e on t h e p a r t o f 23 th e t r i a l c o u r t. I f s h e , in f a c t , has le g a l s ta tu s to do s o , 24 J a c q u e lin e C lancy i s n o t p rev en ted from f i l i n g h e r own a p p lic a 23 t io n f o r h ea r in g on th e m e r its on th e same cau se a s shown by 26 th e O lw ell ca se (su p r a ). Mrs, Clancy f a l l s to meet e ith e r th e requirem ents fo r a p e titio n fo r reco n sid era tio n or the requirem ents fo r a p e titio n to reopen. The t r i a l t r ib u n a l h a v in g made I t s J u d i c i a l d e te r m in a tio n to dlemiBS th e ca se l o s t J u r is d ic tio n (sa v e as o th erw ise pro vided fo r good cause) to reopen the m atter. S tr ip the c o n c lu sio n s from the p e t it io n which i s under a tta c h and th ere i s n ot even s sk e le to n l e f t . There 1 b no e q u ity in v a c a tin g a d is m is s a l as t o some d e fen d an ts and n ot v a ca tin g d ism issa ls o f o th e r d efen d a n ts. E ig h teen months d ela y by a p erso n a l r e p r e s e n ta tiv e in pursuing lit ig a t io n i s lacheB not capable o f ex cu se. WHEREFORE, d e fe n d a n t p ra y s t h a t th e ORDERS made May 1 2 , 1 9 6 4 , be v a c a te d and n u l l i f i e d and t h a t t h e Order o f D is m is s a l, d a ted March 3 1 , 1964 be a ffir m e d , r a t i f i e d and r e i n s t a t e d . Copies o f th is P e titio n fo r R econsideration have been m ailed to th e p a r tie s in d ica ted below. R esp ectfu lly subm itted, Attorney fo r defendants' Dated in San F r a n cisco , C a lifo r n ia t h is 8th day o f Ju ne, 1964. cc - Sm ith, P a rr ish , Paduck & Clancy 315 F in a n cia l Center B u ild in g Oakland, C a lifo r n ia ifeit e 1 e c - D epartm ent o f Employment P .o . Box 1857 2 O akland, C a lifo r n ia c c - P a c i f i c E m p loyers In su r a n c e Company 3 2^4 P in e S t r e e t San F ra n cisco , C a lifo r n ia 4 c c - W estern A sb estos Co. 675 Townsend S tr e e t 5 San F ra n cisco , C a lifo r n ia c c - Mundet Cork C orp. 8 55*1 B ran n an S t r e e t Can P r a n c ic c o , C a lif o r n ia 7 c c - P lb er g la co E n g in eerin g & Supply Co. 1200 - 17th S treet 8 San F ra n cisco , C a lifo rn ia c c - Van A r sd a le & H a rris C o. 9 595 Tunnel Avenue San F ra n cisco , C a lifo rn ia 10 c c - A e tn a C a s u a l t y & S u r e t y C o. 220 M ontgomery S tr e e t 11 San F ran e!eco, C a lifo rn ia c c - C laim s D epartm ent 12 13 14 10 16 17 18 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 23 2e li JL< verification Under p en a lty o r perjury I d e c la r e th e tr u th o f the fo llo w in g : (a) That the con ten ts o f th e fo r e g o in g document a r e t r u e m d c o r r e c t o f ray own k n o w le d g e , e x c e p t a s t o m a tte r s s t a t e d t h e r e in on in fo r m a tio n and b e l i e f ; (b ) t h a t th e m a tters s o s t a t e d a r e b e lie v e d by me t o b e t r u e and c o r r e c t ; and ( c ) t h a t I make t h i s v e r i f i c a t i o n b e c a u se t h e f a c t B s e t f o r t h i n s a i d docum ent a re w it h in my k n ow led ge and b e c a u se aa a t t o r n e y f o r on e o f t h e d e f e n d a n ts h e r e in # I am more f a m i l i a r w it h su ch fa c ta than are the o ffic e r s o f sa id defendant. D oted t h i s 8t h day o f June______ , lf? 6 4 . i n San Fr&nelfleo# C a lifo r n ia . / .- r . q ' .r ^ 1 ^THE INDUSTRIAL, ACCIDENT COMMISSION OP THE 2 STATE 0? CALIFORNIA 5 **** CLAIM N0* 60 %A B L. J . STREITHOHST, | 6 A pplicant, 7 vs. ANSWER TO PETITION FOR 8 WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY, c t a l . and STATE COMPENSATION IHSUPANCE REXNSIDRRATICN a n d /o r ' MOTION TO SET ASIDE DIS'JT-^.'X y OR WANT OF i 9 FUND, AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY PRCIJcTir*;*fNi ,, rp.T"1 " i . . COMPANY, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE l o COMPANY, e t a l , 11 D efendants. i 1 Ma > 2 1>964 1 12 1 1 13 Comes now, d efen d an t STATE COMPENSATION IilSUKANCc' <J 14 FUND, w it h t h i s i t s Answer to P e t i t i o n f o r R e c o n s id e r a tio n 15 a n d /o r M otion t o S e t A sid e D is m is s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n , 16 and in r e s p e c t th e r e o f a lle g e s : 17 1 . S t a t e C om pensation In su r a n c e Fund d e n ie s t h a t 18 th e P e t it io n fo r R econsideration shows any grounds fo r g r a n t- 19 Ing o f R e c o n s id e r a tio n o f th e Order o f March 3 1 , 1254. ; 20 2 . S t a t e Com pensation In su r a n c e Fund d e n ie s t h a t ! 21 th e P e t i t i o n t o S e t A sid e D is m is s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n ; 22 shows any grou n ds f o r d o in g s o . 23 3 . And f o r a f u r th e r s e p a r a te answ er and a f f i r m a t i v e 24 d e fe n se to a l l cla im s a sse rted by p e t it io n in th e above : 2s e n t i t l e d m a t t e r , S t a t e C om pensation In su ra n ce Fund a l l e g e s t h a t ' 23 a l l s a id c la im s a r e barred by th e p r o v is io n s o f S e c tio n s 5400 t o a 1 lu n g s o v e r a p e r io d o f many y e a r s . S e v e r a l e m p lo y e r s and 2 in su ra n ce c a r r ie r s f i l e d an Answer, 3 A pplicant took nc step s to b rin g th e ca se to hearing 4 and on or about Septem ber 2 9 , 1961, c e r ta in d efen d a n ts f i l e d & C P e t i t i o n t o D is m is s f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n , Cn November 2 9 , e 1961, D is m i s s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n wa3 i s s u e d a s t o t h o s e 7 c e r t a i n d e f e n d a n t s . On Decem ber 1 , 19 6 1, S t a t e C om p en sation 8 In su r a n c e Fund f i l e d a P e t it io n to D ism iss fo r Kant o f 9 P r o se c u tio n . A N o tic e o f In te n tio n to D ism iss fo r Kant o f 10 P r o s e c u t io n d a te d D ecem ber S , 1961 was is s u e d by t h e I n d u s t r i a l 11 A c c id e n t C o m m issio n , G eorge W_ L a n e, R e f e r e e . W r itte n o b j e c t i o n 12 wa3 t o b e made w i t h i n 1 5 d a y s from d a t e o f s e r v i c e . On D ecem ber 13 27, 1961# (19 day3 la t e r ) a p p lic a n t's a tto r n e y f ile d an o b je c tio n 14 t o N o t i c e o f I n t e n t i o n t o D is m iss f o r 'Kant o f P r o s e c u t io n . On 10 June 2 0 , 1962, a n o th e r N o t i c e o f I n t e n t i o n t o D is m is s f o r Want ie o f P ro se cu tio n was serv ed by th e I n d u s tr ia l A ccid en t Com m ission. 17 Cn J u ly 3 , 1 9 6 2 , t h e S t a t e C om pensation In s u r a n c e Fund renew ed i 18 i t s r e q u e st fo r a P e t it io n to D ism iss fo r Kant o f P r o se c u tio n . 19 Cn J u ly 1 1 , 1962, t h e a p p l i c a n t ' s a t t o r n e y f i l e d art o b j e c t i o n t o 20 N o t ic e o f I n t e n t i o n t o D ism iss f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n . Cn 21 August 3 , 1962, th e e a s e was s e t f o r h ea rin g on O ctober 1 1 , 1962. 22 Ey l e t t e r o f O c to b e r 8, 1962, th e a p p l i c a n t ' s a t t o r n e y In form ed 23 th e I n d u s t r i a l A c c id e n t Commission t h a t Mr. S t r e i t h c r s t had b een 24 c o n fin e d t o BrooJccide H o s p ita l s e r i o u s l y i l l . Cn O ctob er 1 1 4 25 1962, a p p lic a n t 's a tto r n e y appeared and 3ta te d th a t th e a p p lic a n t 20 was th e n h o s p it a liz e d in what appeared t o be a te r m in a l c o n d itio n . th e ca se was ordered d ism issed fo r fa ilu r e o f p ro secu tio n . CONTENTIONS 1 , The c la im o f J a c q u e lin e C laney I s b arred by th e S t a t u t e o f L i m i t a t i o n s a 3 p r o v id e d by L ab or C ede S e c t i o n s 5*OQ to 5412# in c lu s iv e # and p a r tic u la r ly by Labor Code S e c tio n 5406# w hich p ro v id es: " 5 4 0 5 . The p e r io d w it h in w h ic h may b e commenced p ro ce ed in g s f o r th e c o l l e c t i o n o f th e b e n e fits provided by A r tic le 4 or C h a p ter 2 o f ? a r t 2 o f t h l 3 d i v i s i o n 13 one y e a r from: (a ) The d a te o f d eath where d ea th occu rs w ith in one year from d a te c f in ju r y ; or (b ) The d a te o f la s t fu r n ish in g o f any b en e f i t s under Chapter 2 o f P art 2 o f t h is d i v i s i o n where death occu rs more than one y ea r from th e d a te o f in ju r y ; or# (c ) The d a te o f death# where d eath occu rs more than one y ea r a f t e r th e d a te c f in ju r y and com pensation b e n e f it s have been fu rn ish ed . No su c h p r o c e e d in g s may b e commenced m ore than one year a fte r th e d a te o f d eath , nor more than 240 weeks from th e d a te o f in ju ry ," Leo J . S t r e i t h o r s t d ie d on O ctob er 15# 1 9 6 2 , No com p en sation b e n e f i t s h a v e b een f u r n is h e d . No award h a s b een m ade. More than 240 weeks have passed sin ce th e d ate o f in ju ry a lle g ed to be Ju ly 21# 1959 (See p e titio n e r s 1 A p p lication # case 6 0 C F -1 9 2 -1 4 5 ) R u iz V . I .A . C . ( 1 9 5 5 ) 4 5 C a l . Hd 409# 289 P . 2d 229# 2 0 CCC 26 5. s t a t e C o m p en sa tio n I n s u r a n c e Fund v . I .A .C . (1958) 23 177 2 . Only p ersona a c h ie v e d d ir e c t ly or in d ir e c t ly by a f i n a l O rder# D s c l s i o n o r Award o f t h e C om m issioner e r 1 p r o c e e d in g s a t th e t i n e or f i l i n g o f th e P e t it io n f o r 2 R e c o n s id e r a t io n a n d /o r M otion t o Get A s id e D is m is s a l f o r Want 3 o f P rosecu tion * At th e tim e o f the r ilin g o f th e p e t itio n , 4 J a cq u elin e C lancy was n ot s u b s titu te d In p la c e and ste a d a s 0 th e p erso n a l r e p r e se n ta tiv e and n ext o f k in o f L . J , 6 S tr e lt h o r s t , th e a p p lic a n t. J a cq u elin e C laney h a i no 7 3tatuo a s a party to th e p roceed in gs. S ince no party can 8 p e t i t i o n f o r r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n a f t e r 20 d a y s f o l l o w i n g 9 D is m is s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n , J a c q u e lin e C la n ey I s now 10 b a rre d by t h e S t a t u t e o f L i m i t a t i o n s . L ab or C ode S e c t i o n 5 9 0 3 . 11 3 . Labor Code S e c tio n 5900 e t . s e q . p ro v id es fo r 12 th e m eans o f r e c o n s id e r a tio n from an Order o r D e c is io n o f a 13 r e fe r e e . S e c tio n 5903 p rovid es: 14 "5903. At any tim e w ith in tw enty days a fte r th e s e r v ic e o f any f in a l ord er, d e c isio n or 10 award made and f i l e d by a ccruT .losinner o r a r e fe r e e g ra n tin g or denying com pensation, or 16 a r is in g out o f cr In cid en ta l th e r e to , any p e r s o n a g g r ie v e d t h e r e b y may p e t i t i o n f o r 17 r e c o n s id e r a tio n upon one o r more o f th e f o l l o w i n g g ro u n d s ar.d no e t h e r : 18 (a ) That by such o rd er , d e c id e r ., or award made and f i l e d by a com m issioner o r a 19 r e fe r e e , th e com m ission acted w ith ou t or in e x c e s s o f i t s pov/erc. 20 (b ) That th e o rd er, d e c is io n , or award was procu red by fr a u d . 21 (c ) Tnat th e evidence dees not JU 3tify th e fin d in gs of fa c t. 22 (d ) That th e p e t it io n e r has d isc o v e r e d new e v id e n c e m a t e r ia l t o him , v.-hich h e c o u ld 23 n o t, w ith reason ab le d ilig e n c e , have d is c o v e r e d ar.d p rod u ced a t t h e h e a r i n g , 24 (e) That the fin d in g s of fa ct do not support th e ord er, d e c isio n , or award. 25 N o th in g co n ta in e d lr. t h is s e c t io n s h a l l lim it th e grant o f con tin u in g .J u risd ictio n con tained 26 i n s e c t i o n s 5803 t o 5 5 ? i n c l u s i v e . " j-r 4 a * 1 2 S . 4 6 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 10 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 J*. P e t i t i o n e r f a i l s t o d i s t i n g u i s h a p e t i t i o n f o r reco n sid era tio n from a p e titio n to reopen and f a i l s to g iv e some I n d ic a tio n t o J u s t if y a reop en in g o f th e c a s e . P e titio n e r has not a lle g e d any ground to reopen th is case and by th e fa cta shown t h e r e in i t i s c l e a r th a t th e p e t it io n e r o r p e t it i o n e r 's co u n sel, or b oth , have ex ercised a la ck o f d ilig e n c e in bring in g th e c a s e to h e a r in g , Gee e ,g . C o n so lid a ted '/e c te m S te e l v , I . A . C . , ( 1 9 6 2 ) 2 0 5 C a l, App. 2d 2 7 5 , 27 CCC 1 5 9 ; U .S , P ip e & Foundry Company v , I .A ,C , , su p r a . (a ) I t req u ired more than one and o n e -h a lf year3 fo r th e ap p lican ts tc get th e case t c h e a r in g . A p p lic a tio n was f i l e d on March I 960 and h e a r in g was f i n a l l y s e t f o r O ctob er 1 1 , 1962. D uring t h i s p e r i o d , D is m is s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n was granted to se v er a l d efen d an ts. (b ) As lo n g ago a s Ju ly 1 1 , 1962, a p p lic a n t 's a tto rn ey claim ed to have th e a lle g e d m edical evidence needed to p rosecu te h is c a se . (See O bjection to N otice o f In t e n t i o n t o D is m is s f o r Want c f P r o s e c u t io n , d a ted J u ly 1 1 , 1962) (c ) Dated December 0 , 1961, N o tice c f In te n tio n t o D ism iss w ith in 15 days i f no w r itte n ob j e c t i o n b e made wa3 se r v e d by t h e I n d u s t r i a l A c c id e n t C om m ission th ro u g h Mr, G eorge W. iW U t ih * 1 another o b jectio n (July 11, 1962) .fin a lly a f i l i n g n o d ic a l r e p o r ts th a t dated from 3 May o f 196 1. 4 (d ) A p p lic a n t's a tto r n e y a c t u a lly knew th e 6 lo c a t i o n (B r o o k sid e H o s p it a l) c f Mr. e s tr e lth o r B t d u rin g Mr. s t r e it h o r 3t ' a 7 te r m in a l i l l n e s s . I t aecm3 in c o n c e iv a b le 8 th a t a p p lic a n t 's a tto r n e y would n o t in 9 quire as to hi3 aged c lie n t 's h ea lth , 10 {See p e titio n e r 's attorn ey's le tte r to 11 th e I n d u s tr ia l A ccid en t Commission dated la October 3 , 1 9 5 2 .) 13 ( e ) At th e h e a r in g c f C cto b cr 1 1 , 19S2 ap 14 p lic a n t 'e a tto r n e y knew th e a p p lic a n t 15 was s e r i o u s l y i l l and a t th e t i r e had lfl a c tu a l or c o n s tr u c tiv e knowledge th a t 17 th e a p p li c a n t 's c o n d itio n was te r m in a l. 18 A p p lic a n t, L . J . G t r e it h o r s t , d ied on 19 O ctob er 15> 1962 a t a g e 72. N o tw ith 20 sta n d in g , over one and o n e-h a lf years ai have elapsed before a p p lica n t's attorney 22 attem pted to bring th i3 ea3e to term ination. 93 COA3 p ro v id ed by th e Labor Code, a p p li c a n t 's 24 a tto r n e y had ample tim e to o b je ct tc the 25 N o tic e o f I n t e n t io n t o D ism iss ordered by 28 th e I n d u s t r ia l A ccid en t Commission., George 4*. th a t autopsy fin d in g s confirm a p p lic a n t's o r ig in a l claim th at he was d isa b le d b ecau se or Q 3b cstosi3* (but t h is nan d ied c f carcinom a)* The a lle g e d au top sy fin d in g s would n ot c o n s t it u t e t h e d is c o v e r y "new e v id e n c e '' upon w h ich r e c o n s id e r a t i o n w i l l l i e ev en i f th e san e w ere t im e ly . Labor Code S e c t io n 5 9 0 3 . (d ) "Tender o f m erely new cu m u la tiv e ev id en ce doe3 not c o n s titu te v a lid ground fo r r e c o n sid e r a tio n ." I.A .C . Rule IO87O ( f ) S e e C le n d a n ie l v . I .A .C . (1 9 ^ 1 ) 17 C a l. 2d 659 H I P. 2d 31^ 6 CCC 8 5 . WHEREFORE* i t i s r e s p e c t f u l l y p ra y ed t h a t t h e P e t it io n fo r R e c o n sid e ra tio n a n d /o r M otion to S et A sid e D is m i s s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n b e d e n ie d . C op ies o f t h is Answer to P e t it io n fo r R ec o n sid era tio n a n d /o r M o tio n t o S e t A s id e D is m is s a l f o r Want o f P r o s e c u t io n have been n a ile d on th e p e r so n s and a d d r esse e shown b elow . R e sp e c tfu lly subm itted* A ttorneys for D efendant S ta t e C om pensation In su ra n ce Fund Dated a t San F ran cisco* C a lifo r n ia t h i s 1 9 th day o f Kay* 196^ cc~ Sm ith* P a r r is h * Paduck k C lancy* A tt o r n e y s a t Law 315 F in a n c ia l C en ter B u ild in g * Oakland* C a lifo r n ia M u llen & F i l i p p i * A tt o r n e y s a t Law 315 Montcemery s tr e e t* San F ran cisco* C a lifo r n ia .'lanna 4 Brophy* A tt o r n e y s a t Law 15^0 San P ablo Avenue* O akland, C a lifo r n ia 6 1 VERIFICATION 2 5 Under p en a lty o f p erju ry 1 d ecla re th e tru th o f th e 4 fo llo w in g : (a ) That th e co n ten ts o f th e fo r e g o in g document a re 6 t r u o and c o r r e c t o f my own k n o w le d g e , e x c e p t a s t o m a t t e r s 6 sta te d th e r e in on in form ation and b e lie f ; (b) th a t the m atters 7 so s ta te d a r e b e lie v e d by ne to b e tr u e and c o r r e c t; and (c ) 8 t h a t I naJce t h i s v e r i f i c a t i o n b e c a u s e t h e f a c t s s e t fo r th , i n 9 3 a id d ocu m ent a r e w i t h i n ray k n o w le d g e and b e c a u s e a s a t t o r n e y 10 f o r t h e d e f e n d a n t h e r e i n , I am m ore f a m i l i a r w it h s u c h f a c t e 11 th a n a r e t h e o f f i c e r s o f s a i d d e f e n d a n t . 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dated a t San F r a n c isc o , C a lifo r n ia 18 this 19th day of May, 196H 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 t hi ~i " ~ i ni - yf . i , j r ^ ' V . V l l n M X i i - GALIFORN& inspection ratii^ bureau H 53 MISSION SWEET SAN FRANCISCO 3, CALIFORNIA Dec eiv ed . n, o 'ntHrN ^ v a k MMr,MtO- ifuUabvM*k1 Hi HOVAJ1MATVi *C*V4*V .-r. APR 4 * 0 March 31, 19&> s- M M If M R. T. Read n** Cenerai F ile " Department o f In d u stria l R elations In d u stria l Accident OquhI sbI od P . 0 . Bo* 603 San F ran cisco 1 , C a lifo rn ia A tte n tio n : G eorge W. Lane, R eferee RE: L. J . STREITHORST V. ESTERI! ASBESTOS C O ., ET AL Claim Ito. SP 192-1*45 Dear S ir; In rep ly to your l e t t e r o f March 11, i 960, we wish to send the follow in g information. W estern A sb e sto s C o ., 675 Tovneer.d S t . , San F r a n c is c o , C a lif o r n ia / S ta t e Com pensation In su ra n c e Fund, P o lic y Ito. D 9322*4-56, 1 -1 -5 6 -5 7 , * P o lic y No. D 93221+-57, 1-1-57-5& , P o lic y No. J> 9322U-58, 1 -1 -5 8 -5 9 P o lic y No. D 93221+-59, 1 -1 -5 9 -6 0 . P la n t A sbestos C o ., 1300 Fourth S t ., Q n e ry v ille , C a lifo rn ia In d u s t r i a l in d . C o ,, P o lic y No. C.-' 602110, 1-1 -5 8 -5 9 * P o lic y No. CP 6O8O56, 1 -1 -5 9 -6 0 . F lu o r M aintenance C o ., t0 6 Ward S t . , M a rtin e z , C a li f o r n i a A s s o c ia te d I n d . C o rp ., P o lic y No. 1+80285, *+-25-52-53 C o n tin e n ta l Cue. C o ., P o lic y No. 6UO9667, *4-25-53-5**, P o lic y No. (Not ' a v a i l a b l e ) A-i>5-5^-5v, P o lic y Ito. 1907635, `-25- 55- 30, P o lic y No. 189**526, U-25- 56- 37, P o lic y No. 1 O9U526, U -25-57-5S, P o lic y No. 1891+526, *-25-58-59. C. F. Braun & C o ., 1000 South Frem ont A v e., A lham bra, C a lif o r n ia American Motorists I t s . Co., p o lic y No. CM *+2061+0-1-1-52-5 3 ^ and }*olicy No. CM *012, 1-1-53-5*** Lumbermens' M utual C > j^ n lty C o ., P o lic y No. C **2**65**, 1-1-53-5** i American M o to ris ts In.*. C o ., I o llc y No, CM UitioiJ, l-l-5**-53> P o lic y No* CM l+PoOli, 1-1-> - ' , I'o lic y ].o. CM *+2o012, l-l---o -5 V , I"o llc y .N o . CM **2v0l 2 1 -1 -5 7 -5 0 , and P o lic y Ho. CM a 2 \0 1 2 , 1-1-5*3-59* > in n IT I'lftl / RECEIVED APR 4 - I960 Department o f In d u s tria l H alations I n d u s t r i a l A ccid en t Comal salo n m'wiii of i*M.-*t*uu leunoat wine* v mciiiui. icooun March 31, I960 Cenerai Fila Armstrong Cork Co., 30U Shaw Road, South San F rancisco, C a lifo rn ia T ravelers In e. Co., Policy No. 1-1-52-53, P olicy No, 26738C-1*, 1-1-53-51*, P olicy No. 3306210, 1-1-5M 5 P o licy 0 . h k & W , 1-1-55*56, / P olicy No. 1*991518, 1-1-56-57, Policy No. 61*83811*, 1 - 1 - 57- 58, P olicy No- 7226992, 1-1-58-59. San Jose Asbestos Co., San Jose, C alifo rn ia We a re subm itting coverage fo r Owen le in lo dba: San Jose Asbestos Co, / Ul*0 Lennon Way, San Jose. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co., Policy No. 60J551, 3-9-56-57, Ik>Hcy No. 705080, 3-9-57-58. Chas. Ayers C o., 698 Minnesota S t., San F rancisco, C a lifo rn ia (Nothing p r io r to 5 -26-5 3). / Argonaut Insurance Co., P olicy No. 105666, 5-26-53-1-1-5^ P o licy No. IIU699, I - I - 5U-55, P olicy No. 133859, I - I - 55- 56, P o licy No. 11*7705, 1-1-56-57, Policy No. 020M*, 1-1-57-58. F ib erg las Engineering t Supply D ivision, I200-17th S t . , San F rancisco, C a lifo rn ia Aetna Casualty 4 Surety Co., Policy No. 31C 733, 9- l . 5lt.55, P olicy No. 3IC 781, 9-1*55-56, P olicy No. 3IC 822, 9-1 - 56-57 L orcntten Co., 2267 Market S t., Oakland, C alifo rn ia / In d u s tr ia l Ind. Co., P olicy No. 501 CP 002*29, 1-1-55-56. A etna S te e l P ro d u cts C o rp o ratio n , 6l Broadvay, Ncv fo rk . J H ertford Accident and In d ., Policy No. US 995537, 10-6-2*5-**6, P o licy No. US 65069, lO-O-Uo-J*?, Policy NO. US 125006, 10-6-1*7-48, Bay CitieB Asbestos Co., L td ., F ifth Ave. 4 E. 12th S t ., Oakland, C alifo rn ia I n d u s tr ia l Ind. Exchange, 3-31-^*3 u n til (Policy numbers n o t a v a ila b le ), E ffectiv e 3-31-1*5 Policy No. 6-.p-01l68. Very tru ly yours, Ft. T. Bend, Superintendent Underwriting Department B0 :g r Bf. l i l t L Hex OJu. / G> r\'-s"--.-Tr cf U- ielitIgkj *r*T* or CAt-iroAWT*---- -; DEPARTMENT Of INDUSTRIAL KEikTO^l if'*': a rj^rM/i Accwft ` I LL E& D industjual accioej rco.^Mip^NE` h^"1." MMAARfU4' 1060 --M ?.*r :nt Cc- ^iion r e c e iv e d 1 I'-oO a p p u g a t ^o n J Y l / A 1 G ffiog^ Q flice 60 ^C A SE NO. 1.9 2 1 4 5 L. J . STRE1TH0RST im K U T * " n. SEE ATTACHED SHEET * SEE ATTACHED SHEET aM #fva IfV U V Il l m v iftK tC A Iftll 2 6 3 7 LINCOLN AVE, RICHMOND m x A i? i m tM Sccul Security NoTM iin f n r iiiH iti ItM llta U n til i u m % --- L. ~-- Ju ly J . STKEITHORST I i* iiruni -----------------------------------------------------------------------2 1 , 195 9 ____ iTr #i routi fN lin v tT a*uft*Uati , r iic g c d u t w h ile , . Insuliation Installer ~ hr ___ _ ___ ^ California, by err*, van r u o h i i mim *ctm n mm w ork Chest .. hr nutaioed injory aribhj out of and in the coarse o f che employment as folkm s chm i aa ln s u lla t lo n I n s t a lle r from 1944 t o J u ly 1959 wtyHuerrtu ftIcurt disability namely pneumoconiosis> probably esbestosis. ^daltid; i atari *<ui am n **n n u amvhhibt nmti i. t n u l l * C M M IV __ was the employer'* insurance carrier on date o f injury. m B e n T I* W J M T I M l M l FT* f l I t a t i H h i - l i i > ( * i n i U V i |p J . ___ J u ly . 2 1 4 - 1 9 5 9 _____________________________ ** V*T*l )MfT a rc w t H i H T i t t f r* m i fte ft u d il m u l f i n f t e i l 4. Vi cpmpfBntiiM ffo t ( i mm s. Earni-ng* at umt of. .aa. jury f Maxim_u_m _________ , i - t _______ tllU l ftllt The him of pay IU 1 N > ii T k V lftt t U t | T I T | AT M I W M I I H I U l * T l . ,C a cher *ny wime?.._____ 1 6. T u mcdicaj crmcment needed?- e re lodging, hoard, or other s d r u t a fo h o fu/niihed treatment?. aw *.11 .'.1 i n l i M I ftr I 4 t1 a n * t l U T U T i | M in I > l ttiT K * n r t m m i l ftlM J Uk thii ipscr wriy if injury renjted in deicK. Dt* of Aatk_ f t r l l i U P . M M l l M t 1 I I U T M V M t l * 1 V t U H M T f f t r U f a 44 Alx i m i I t I. This application ii filed u> determine liability fori *- Temporary disability Y C 3 b. Perm anent diiihiijty^YCfi-. c Medical treatm ent -- d* Medical coves_- e. LieigatioA ttpcAM J. f, Ekatli bandit. lvtaj* trw g* Buna] capenac. ii hkkitwh mn ,, h. m n umi u u IT HEREFORD, it it rtqmntei ib*t 4 ttmt W plare br fixed far bteriag * * J fbmt wmrnnxrl b* ***dt p e t/is x the W orim t^i C&m}?m%gtion f a t * 0/ Ca/f/dnua. . nniTTAtm ^ t / . MatVih 7 . rr^r/ O My i t TOfiO y.-^hsr. -e. . l,, j , sTREirucfiax 2fr37 LXUCQLU AVE.Rielaron), cali?. ASBESTOS IirPLGYURS - I 9WL to 1959 1959 WESTER!! ASBESTOS CO. PLALT ASBESTC CO. 75 iowirsEiD s x . , s . ? . 3 ( 'IXlT- I 30OCFOUBXH'ST*., EU2REVIILE G 19?c VESTE' 1! ASBESTOS OC. flour iaittllalce c c . C. ?. RRAHJ r CC. ARIiSTRDUG ccz; CC. fc?5 TOWISEUI) T . / 'S . F . 3 Met WARD S T ., iALTIUEZ : P.O.BOX 22, L.A. 10 0 0 s o , Rir-:ci:r a v e ., 30R SLAV ED., SO. S.F ^ CAL SA! JOSE SL.STCS c o . saz: jo ss, calif. i wester:: asbestos co. 75 TOKSSUD ST., S .F . arll ;c::d ce;:: cc. 30M SLAV PD. , SC. S.F. FLOUR KAIUTSnjrCE CO. PLATT ASBESTOS CC. CUAS. ALEES CO. VA3 ST. , UALUTLZ C tzaty- 1300 (FsDELL ST., EULLYVTLLS G : (,9^ iULG.LTOTA ,,T,, S.F, FXElcOLjfcS LTG <.. 5TFFLY LI7. (IU r e n t 1950) 1200 - 17tU ST., S.F. FI-.-LjCLjCJ LTG. . LTTLY CL. J* .*ft -0J F * f t CT-Ai. AYE ES CC, loi.tttee: CC. 2*M C. . , * i w - ^ * 1200 - 17th rt. , S.F. Il l LC.jj^ A /.., V . ,. /1 ~Ll 9-` :lt :>~o_v. le. , l. f . G'' ( A . 1* , U .^ iL ix- i.ij se., nv.rinvz _ , . -* _ - j. T.\;.r,, . s.. 1 :1 c : ,,J'A V . K .lLyyilll ------,.?rf- .. . g saturni iniitniiiAfif lum ^ 7 , T. HIOfiPE 4 Son hex hegieu, I 3 5 I OCEAN AVE., VUIYTXLLS iV a . LAllDIZ: SI", i Kii::c, i u a l a 19?2 WE5KW ASl&SX'OS C. iroNDE'j cera; coup. (j 7 ? TCV/NOIA!D Ox.j i>.P. ^NrO PIJAUiN O.'.j O.x. 19 5 1 CNAC. AEI1S CO. KNADS C'CHK COUP l-ECAI; CLAD l 'XAXA'JlC:. CC, V.XTLTil) AOLEOrC CO. (, 9& *11: a**#*j CT.,* _' ) **P . *rPO LJC.i A*. SV. j j.F LOj **<\s f 7 9 TCY.UVL se., ...y. 3 * *vr*t ' 1990 Alilo :nCIIC- co: ;x CD, J . X. EClPU 4 GON 3 0 H L)*lJ4r* T'.CixP,J U*L, O.X . 1 3 9 1 ocean a v a . , j i u i t a l j ,:; 19^9- wiajxbi -aspectos c o . J . T. TNOKPE CO. M 6 7 9 xowngut) ov, , s . f . t 1 3 9 1 OCLAN AVA, , UAUY/ILLL I 9UC AETNA STEEL rhCDNCS CCIi, V-HO.LHir ASBESTOS CO. b i lagadway, ir::.: va-jc b 75 C r s ,:.d sv. j c . v. O.? alona s s e l p .xurcv:: cci.P ' ./. (A U or x<M-_ alxna fc.ojucxs ce..! -ir.NDXi' c o u c o :j '. i* X V.'rtYj . "C. j . 0*1 lAvO**X)*t*\x y tti *.*.-**!. MiO :'/uu., .A . >.V j w*'" 1CM ' VAX AHSDALJ -C* NA- II "A . 9 9 9 PIi`U . CY. , J , S, ' IUY.CTIE3'AOIU'OS CO. '. m ir :: a y l , c: r.wi , ca.-*_ . -(TaAon. over by Asbestes C)*.;'-..., : -lyiva^ K U - ` : . - . ,. V.AuNr-;jjt i '" * ` r u ^ is . r ' V i r i o n c^;vt>n^;Ax^a(viyJin*ij ;Al ::]> r. . Ce... -.v'-V v'XO^^^i'pitebf>9s) -. ''a 1 v 9 9 . ! i ' T i r x ' , . ' , v .F . I*-1: ' A V-Av^yA-'.', - " 1 ''\ ' f _ ' .V 7^ : P I P I A T E . T L . m b c i M 1.& aAlili A^pv;r'- - lo * fc: fe PE?**''1