Document evJ2gqYyMonqyZyvz4xo1DNog

(Drislane - Purcell) 337 1 completely by the time I left or not. But the OSHA 2 regulations permitted five, ten at one time, five, two, one, 3 0.1, so apparently there were other people who had feelings 4 that some exposure levels were permissible. 5 Q Did you equate permissible with safe? 6 MR. FRIESTEDT: Objection to form. 7 A No, I did not. I'm -- I feel if they said 8 permissible, they must be safe based of the studies that 9 NIOSH must have made to go and feed OSHA. 10 Q Isn't it true that the language of OSHA indicates 11 that there is a significant risk to workers exposed at the 12 permissible exposure level? 13 MR. FRIESTEDT: Objection to form. 14 A I don't doubt what you say is true. I don't 15 recall all this stuff. I have been out of the business for 16 several years now. 17 Q Let me direct your attention to a document I would 18 like to mark as JJ. 19 (Exhibit JJ, 6/10/75 Weaver Letter, marked for 20 identification.) 21 BY MR. PURCELL: 22 Q It's letter to you from Mr. Weaver dated June 10, 23 1975. It says, "Dear Ed, Recently I observed the showing of A.S.E. Reporting Service (518) 458-1091