Document ev5joe02o6znOnOnG3jx6gJZM

(conoco) Interoffice Communication to Bill Broddle, Carl Kerfoot From Tom Grumbles Date December 22, 1981 subject TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING Enclosed are approval letters to proceed with the testing of CDR 101, 550Land 600L, and the 550L and 600L Sulfonates. Please take steps to proceed with the testing. Thomas G. Grumbles ajo Enclosure CCR 000001609 Interoffice Communication to j. 6. Dopper From T. G. Grumbles Date December 17, 1981 Subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING OF CDR 101 (conoco) ~Y "T, j-v-- By this letter I am requesting approval to proceed with toxicology testing of CDR 101. The Toxicology Assessment Committee has reviewed the specifications for the reformulated CDR product. Due to the process solvent change this product is significantly different from the first CDR and the toxicology testing results for CDR cannot be extrapolated for use with CDR 101. A full acute testing screen would be necessary. Approximate cost of this screen is $4,500. r: Thomas G. Grumbles ajo fiJA JGD ill fMK JAT CDB )SB LAH FILE F-UP oooooife10 CC* (conoco) ! 4 ? 9- o Interoffice Communication To From Date Wayne Hilgers Tom Grumbles December 17, 1981 Received DEC 1 8 1981 SURFACTANT CHEM. subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING FOR 550L, 600L and Sulfonates By this letter I am requesting your approval to proceed with toxicological testing of 550L, 600L, 550L Sulfonate, and 600L Sulfonate. It is my understanding that the toxicology testing needs for the subject chemicals have been discussed with you. These needs have been reviewed by the Toxicology Assessment Committee. The committee has determined a complete acute testing screen is necessary for 550L and 600L and a com plete screen without an inhalation study is needed for 550L Sulfonate and 600L Sulfonate produced in Ponca City. Approximate costs for a full screen are $4,500, and a screen without inhalation is approximately $2,200. ajo cc Carl Kerfoot Interoffice Communication To Paul Fetzer From Tom Grumbles oate December 17, 1981 subiect WRITTEN DETERMINATIONS FOR "UNKNOWNS" As we have discussed, I support your effort to do written determinations for the previously unidentified chemicals which routinely appear on your chromatographic analysis of air samples. I have reviewed the list of chemicals identified by Ponca City in TSR NO. 2153-81-839-1. The chemicals identified with applicable exposure limits, generally have TLV's greater than 100 ppm, and in many cases greater than 500 ppm. Also, as I under stand from our discussions measured levels of these chemicals are in the 1-10 ppm range. I am not aware of any special health effects or other toxicological properties of the identified chemicals that would warrant continued routine monitoring. For these reasons, as stated, I encourage your effort to do written deter minations of these identified unknowns. Please let me know if you wish to discuss this further. Thomas G. Grumbles ajo cc Steve Ashby IS tfC-fts CCR. 000001612 Interoffice Communication to Wayne Hilgers From jom Grumbles Date December 17, 1981 Subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING FOR 550L, 600L and Sulfonates By this letter I am requesting your approval to proceed with toxicological testing of 550L, 600L, 550L Sulfonate, and 600L Sulfonate. It is my understanding that the toxicology testing needs for the subject chemicals have been discussed with you. These needs have been reviewed by the Toxicology Assessment Committee. The committee has determined a complete acute testing screen is necessary for 550L and 600L and a com plete screen without an inhalation study is needed for 550L Sulfonate and 600L Sulfonate produced in Ponca City. Approximate costs for a full screen are $4,500, and a screen without inhalation is approximately $2,200. Thomas G. Grumbles ajo cc Carl Kerfoot Bill Groves Bill Broddle CCR 000001613 (Conoco) To J. G. Dopper From j. g. Grumbles ate December 17, 1981 Subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING OF CDR 101 By this letter I am requesting approval to proceed with toxicology testing of CDR 101. The Toxicology Assessment Committee has reviewed the specifications for the reformulated CDR product. Due to the process solvent change this product is significantly different from the first CDR and the toxicology testing results for CDR cannot be extrapolated for use with CDR 101. A full acute testing screen would be necessary. Approximate cost of this screen is $4,500. Thomas G. Grumbles ajo CCR 000001614 (Conoco Interoffice Communication To Louis Legendre, Keith Fogg prom Date Tom Grumbl es December 17, 1981 Subiect INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AUDIT OF THE LCCP This letter is to confirm your participation in the subject audit to be done on January 20, 21, and 22. The audit will begin the morning of the 20th and should conclude by 2:00 p.m. on the 22nd. Please let me know what your travel plans are. CJY^ Thomas G. Grumbles ajo CCR 000001615 (conoco) Interoffice Communication To Bill Broddle, Carl Kerfoot From Tom Grumbles ate December 22, 1981 Subject TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING Enclosed are approval letters to proceed with the testing of CDR 101, 550Land 600L, and the 550L and 600L Sulfonates. Please take steps to proceed with the testing. J cv'--------- Thomas G. Grumbles ajo Enclosure CCR 000001616 Cconoco) Interoffice Communication to J. G. Dopper From T. G. Grumbles Date December 17, 1981 Subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING OF CDR 101 T.Jp~ By this letter I am requesting approval to proceed with toxicology testing of CDR 101. The Toxicology Assessment Committee has reviewed the specifications for the reformulated CDR product. Due to the process solvent change this product is significantly different from the first CDR and the toxicology testing results for CDR cannot be extrapolated for use with CDR 101. A full acute testing screen would be necessary. Approximate cost of this screen is $4,500. CCR 000001617 (conoco) >Q1 V Interoffice Communication To From Date Wayne Hilgers Tom Grumbles December 17, 1981 RECEIVED DEC 1 8 1981 SURFACTANT CHEM. Subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING FOR 550L, 600L and Sulfonates ft7 By this letter I am requesting your approval to proceed with toxicological testing of 550L, 600L, 550L Sulfonate, and 600L Sulfonate. It is my understanding that the toxicology testing needs for the subject chemicals have been discussed with you. These needs have been reviewed by the Toxicology Assessment Committee. The committee has determined a complete acute testing screen is necessary for 550L and 600L and a com plete screen without an inhalation study is needed for 550L Sulfonate and 600L Sulfonate produced in Ponca City. Approximate costs for a full screen are $4,500, and a screen without inhalation is approximately $2,200. Thomas G. Grumbles cc Carl Kerfoot Bill Groves Bill Broddle CC ft 000001613 (conoco) to Paul Fetzer From Tom Grumbles Date December 17, 1981 Subject WRITTEN DETERMINATIONS FOR "UNKNOWNS" As we have discussed, I support your effort to do written determinations for the previously unidentified chemicals which routinely appear on your chromatographic analysis of air samples. I have reviewed the list of chemicals identified by Ponca City in TSR NO. 2153-81-839-1. The chemicals identified with applicable exposure limits, generally have TLV's greater than 100 ppm, and in many cases greater than 500 ppm. Also, as I under stand from our discussions measured levels of these chemicals are in the 1-10 ppm range. I am not aware of any special health effects or other toxicological properties of the identified chemicals that would warrant continued routine monitoring. For these reasons, as stated, I encourage your effort to do written deter minations of these identified unknowns. Please let me know if you wish to discuss this further. si u ^ Thomas G. Grumbles ajo cc Steve Ashby CCR 000001619 Cconoco) .Atdftisj Interoffice Communication to Wayne Hilgers From Tom Grumbles ate December 17, 1981 Subject TOXICOLOGY TESTING FOR 550L, 600L and Sulfonates By this letter I am requesting your approval to proceed with toxicological testing of 550L, 600L, 550L Sulfonate, and 600L Sulfonate. It is my understanding that the toxicology testing needs for the subject chemicals have been discussed with you. These needs have been reviewed by the Toxicology Assessment Committee. The committee has determined a complete acute testing screen is necessary for 550L and 600L and a com plete screen without an inhalation study is needed for 550L Sulfonate and 600L Sulfonate produced in Ponca City. Approximate costs for a full screen are $4,500, and a screen without inhalation is approximately $2,200. Thomas G. Grumbles cc Carl Kerfoot Bill Groves Bill Broddle 000l>2 ccr. oo