Document e5j8g9NonMV6LX4VBea9Rg4og
AR12&-0IOX
DIETARY ACUTE MALLARD DUCK STUDY
: -W
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1-Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3)
Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was taken from 3M lot number 217. Sample was stored under ambient conditions prior to testing. Purity determined to be 90.49% by LC/MS, 1H-HMR, 19FNMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
Method: OPPTS 850.2200, OECD 205, and FIFRA Subdivision E. Section 71-2 Type: Dietary acute GLP: Yes Year completed: 2000 Species: Anas platyrhynchos Supplier: Whistling Wings, Inc., Hanover, IL Analytical monitoring: PFOS measured on Day 0 for homogeneity in feed and verification, and Day 5 for stability. Test phases: Acclimation - 9 days
Exposure - 5 days Post-exposure observation - 3 or 17 days Statistical methods: LC50 values calculated by probit analysis using the computer software of C.E. Stephan. Body weight data were compared by Dunnett's test using TOXSTAT software. No statistical analyses were applied to feed consumption data. Test bird age: 10 days Pretreatment: None
Test conditions: Housing and environmental conditions: Indoors in batteries of thermostatically controlled brooding pens. Floor space of each pen measured approximately 62 X 90 cm. Ceiling height was approximately 25.5 cm. External walls, ceilings and floors were constructed of galvanized steel wire and sheeting. Identification: Each group of birds identified by pen number and test concentration. Individuals identified by wing bands. Number of replicates: Six for controls, two for each treatment group Number of ducks per replicate: five
C012G7
Number of concentrations: Eight plus a negative control Feed and water: Game bird ration formulated as below, water from the town of Easton public water supply. Both provided ad libitum during acclimation and testing.
Game Bird Ration
Ingredients
Percent
Fine Corn Meal
44.83
Soy Bean Meal, 48% Protein
30.65
W heat Midds
6.50
Protein Base
6.00
Agway Special, 60% Protein
4.00
Alfalfa Meal, 20% Protein
3.00
Dried W hey
2.50
Ground Limestone
0.90
Eastman CalPhos
0.60
Methionine Premix + Liquid
0.35
Vitamin and Mineral Premix (see below)
0.32
GL Ferm (Fermatco)1
0.25
Salt Iodized
0.10
'Fermentation by-products (source of unidentified growth factors)
Vitamin and Mineral Premix
Vitamin or Mineral Vitamin D3 Vitamin A Riboflavin Niacin Pantothenic Acid Vitamin B12 Folic Acid Biotin Pyridoxine Thiamine Vitamin E Vitamin K (Menadione dimethylpyrimldinol bisulfite) Manganese Zinc Copper Iodine Iron Selenium
Amount Per Ton 2,000,000 I.C.U.
7,000,000 I.U. 6 grams 40 grams 10 grams 8 mg 600 mg 64 mg 1.2 grams 1.2 grams
20,000 I.U. 5.8 grams 102 grams 47 grams 6.8 grams 1.5 grams 51 grams 182 grams
Prophylaxis: None Brooding compartment mean temperature: 38 + 2C
0012G8
Ambient room mean temperature: 25.2 + 0.7C Average relative humidity: 53 + 18% Photoperiod: Sixteen hours light per day Lighting: fluorescent lights which closely approximate noon-day sunlight; average approximately 207 lux.
Test diet preparation: Test substance mixed directly into the ration by means of a Hobart mixer. No carrier was used.
Diet sampling: Homogeneity of the test substance in the diet evaluated by collecting six samples from the 9.1 ppm and six from the lowest and highest concentration. Samples collected from the top, middle, and bottom of the left and right sections of the mixing vessel. These samples also served as the verification samples for these concentrations. Two verification samples from the remaining concentrations and one from the control were collected at preparation on Day 0. Stability samples were collected at the end of the exposure period (Day 5) from the control (one sample) and each treatment group (two samples each).
RESULTS
Nominal concentrations: Bk control, 9.1, 18.3, 36.6, 73.2, 146, 293, 586, and 1171 ppm Measured concentrations: <LOQ, 9.8, 19.5, 40.2, 74.5, 174, 291,537, and 1196 ppm Element value: Dietary LC50 = 628 (448 - 958) ppm
No mortality concentration = 146 ppm NOEC (body weight gain) = 36.6 ppm All element values based on nominal concentrations
Analytical Methodology: Diet samples were extracted with methanol. Analyses of test solutions were performed at Wildlife International Ltd. using high performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (HPLC/MS). When determining the concentration of the test substance in the test solutions, the same and most prominent peak response for perfluorooctanesulfonate was used. No attempt was made to quantify on the basis of individual isomeric components. The LOQ (limit of quantitation) was 1.15 ppm in this study. The mean percent recovery of matrix fortifications analyzed concurrently during sample analysis was 94.7. Samples collected for determination of homogeneity in diet ranged from 102 - 108% of nominal. Samples collected for verification in diet had
C012G9
measured values from 92 to 119% of nominal. Measured values for ambient stability samples taken at Day 5 ranged from 94 - 130% of nominal.
Summary of analytical chemistry data:
Homogeneity in Avian Diet___________________________
Nominal Test Concentration,
ppm
Measured Values at Day 0, ppm
Mean Measured Concentration,
ppm
Percent of Nominal
9.1 18.3
9.52, 9.70, 9.79, 8.09, 10.9, 10.5 18.5, 23.4, 18.3, 17.3, 19.4, 19.9
9.8 19.5
108 107
1171
1239, 1221, 1118, 1301, 1163, 1133
1196
102
Verification in Avian Diet
Nominal Test Concentration,
ppm
Measured Duplicate Concentrations at Day 0, ppm
Mean Measured Concentration,
ppm
Percent of Nominal
Negative Control 36.6
< LOQ 45.7, 34.6
_
40.2
_
110
73.2
77.8, 71.2
74.5
102
146
176, 172
174 119
293
274, 307
291 99
586
550,523
537 92
Ambient Stability in Avian Diet
Day 0 Mean Measured
Concentration, ppm
Negative Control
Measured Duplicate Concentrations at Day 5, ppm
Mean Measured Concentration,
ppm
Mean Percent of
Day 0
< LOQ
.
9.8
12.3, 11.0
11.7
119
19.5
18.2, 19.7
19.0
97
40.2
47.9, 56.8
52.4
130
74.5
77.6, 77.9
77.8
104
174 291 537 1196
167, 160 297, 293 552, 530 1150, 1122
164 295 541 1136
94.3 101 101 95
C01270
Biological observations Survival and clinical observations: No mortalities occurred in the control group, and all birds were normal in appearance and behavior throughout the test. The first deaths occurred on day 4 in the 1171 ppm treatment. Mortality occurred through Day 8 in all dose groups > 293 ppm with some of the deaths being during the post-exposure period. There were no treatment-related mortalities or overt signs of toxicity at concentrations < 146 ppm. Birds at all concentrations > 293 ppm displayed signs of toxicity including reduced reaction to stimuli (sound and motion), loss of coordination, ruffled appearance, lethargy and lower limb weakness. Birds at the 1171 ppm level also displayed prostrate posture, depression and convulsions through Day 8. Recovery with normal appearance and behavior was noted from Day 9 through test termination Body weight gain: When compared to the control group, there were no apparent treatment related effects on body weight among the birds in concentrations < 36.6 ppm. During the Day 8-15 and Day 15-22 post-exposure periods, body weight gain appeared comparable among all groups. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in weight gain at the 9.1 ppm level for the Day 0-5 and Day 5-8 periods. However, differences from the control group at the 9.1 ppm level appear to be due to a lower mean Day 0 body weight for the 9.1 ppm level, and were not dose responsive. Therefore, these differences were not considered treatment related. Marked, treatment-related, concentration responsive effects on body weight was noted in concentrations > 73.2 ppm for Days 0-5; Day 5-8 post-exposure weight gain continued to be reduced at concentrations > 293 ppm. Feed Consumption: When compared to the control group, there was a marked reduction in feed consumption in the treatment groups > 293 ppm throughout the study. Gross Necropsy: All birds that died during the study, half of those surviving at Day 8 and the rest at test termination were subjected to a gross necropsy. Necropsy results for birds found dead were similar, including thin condition, loss of muscle mass, altered spleen color, empty crops, and empty gastrointestinal tracts. These necropsy findings were considered to be treatment related.
001271
Percent Cumulative Mortality
Nominal Concentration,
ppm
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Negative
0
0
0
0
0
Control
9.1 0 0 0 0 0
18.3 0 0 0 0 0 36.6 0 0 0 0 0
73.2 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 0 293 0 0 0 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 10
1171 0 0 0 20 60 *No mortalities occurred in any of the treatment levels from Day 8 to Day 22
Day 6
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 20 80
Day 7
0
0 0 0 0 0 10 30 90
Day 8*
0
0 0 0 0 0 20 30 90
Body Weight (grams)
Exposure Period
R ecovery Period
Nominal Concentration,
ppm
Mean Body Weight, Day 0
Mean Body Weight Change Day 0-5
Mean Body Weight Change Day 5-8
Mean Body Weight Change Day 8-15
Mean Body Weight Change
Day 15-22
Mean Total Body Weight
Change Day 8-22
Mean Body Weight, Day 22
Negative Control
135
144
101
230
183 413
823
9.1 119 108 91 230 198 427 773
18.3
146 131
100 241
186 427
811
36.6
147 128 100 243 208 451 828
73.2
143 117 82 216 203 418 782
146 143 100 89 232 124 356 688
293
129 32
57 256 234 490 701
586
144 -6
36 221 219 439 613
1171
147 -37 1531 198 251 449 634
001272
Mean Average Feed Consumption
Nominal Concentration,
ppm
Grams
Grams
Grams
Grams
Feed/Bird/Day Feed/Bird/Day Feed/Bird/Day Feed/Bird/Day
Days 0-5
Days 6-8
Days 8-15
Days 15-22
Negative Control
92
125 171 180
9.1 73 117 172 198
18.3
91 132 186 204
36.6 73.2
94 125 165 179 77 101 148 173
146 105 159 159 164 293 44 63 109 132
586 36 55 114 143
1171
22 25 106 154
Gross Pathological Observat'ons from Birds that Died in Study
Crop empty
Finding
293 ppm 586 ppm 1171 ppm N
N =2
N=3
=9
02
7
Emaciated G.l. Tract, primarily empty Gizzard contents bile stained Gizzard, empty Intestinal contents, black and tar-like
11 11 02 00 00
4 1 4 1 1
Keel prominent Kidneys, pale Loss of muscle mass Spleen, grey Spleen, small and pale Spleen, pale Thin
00 00 22 00 11 02 11
2 1 5 1 2 3 4
001273
CONCLUSIONS The dietary LC50 value for Mallard Duck exposed to PFOS was determined to be 628 ppm with a 95% confidence interval of 448 to 958 ppm. The slope of the concentration-response curve was 3.67 and the chi-square value was 2.13. The no mortality concentration was 146 ppm. Based upon reductions in body weight gain at the 73.2 ppm test concentration, the no observed effect concentration was 36.6 ppm. Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133 DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking = 1 REFERENCES This study was conducted at Wildlife International Ltd., Easton, MD at the request of the 3M Company. OTHER Last changed: 5/1/00
001274