Document e1evyq2QGR70eG6dog74X2pve
1 that there was an increase.
Page 3535
2 You need to look at the subgroups in the
3 study. You cannot just make a blanket statement.
4 Q Well, if you want, I will be happy to show
5 this to you.
6 I am looking at a deposition of yours in
7 November of 192 where you testified that there was no
8 increase in cancer and nonmalignant diseases in
9 refinery workers for studies you have done for Mobil.
10 A When you talk about overall, that is true,
11 but when we look at a subgroup of people who were
12 hired before 1950, remember, the exposure may be
13 higher in the past, especially for benzene.
14 Q Okay. Let me ask you about another one.
15 Do you recall doing an epidemiological study
16 for Shell regarding no increased risk of cancer in
17 pesticide contaminated drinking water in Fresno
18 County, California?
19 A Yes.
20 Q And you have also done research onarsenic
21 contamination at a Super Fund cleanup site for the