Document dgG5xYO3w5Re7ng9QKVRDmeG

ft E A ~ United States .._..,~ Environmental Protectior ,,. Agency Region 6 - Enforcement & Compliance Assurance Division INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Date(s): Media Program: Regulatory Program(s) 10/21/2024 Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) / 1018 Disclosure Company Name: Facility Name: Facility Physical Location: (city, state, zip code) Mailing address: (city, state, zip code) County/Parish: Facility Phone Number Facility Contact: Hunt Military Community (HMC) Fort Sam Houston Family Housing 2739 Dickman Road #407 Ft. Sam Houston, Texas, 78234 2739 Dickman Road #407 Ft. Sam Houston, Texas, 78234 Bexar 210-514-2971 Monica Garcia Monica.garcia@huntcompanies.com FRS Number: Identification/Permit Number: Media Identifier Number: NAICS: SIC: NA NA NA 53131 6531 Personnel participating in inspection: Stan Lancaster EPA Region 6 Angela Hays EPA Region 6 Kiera Hancock EPA Region 6 Andrea Price EPA OECA HQ Monica Garcia Hunt Military Community Michael R. Mathews JBSA Fort Sam Houston Kerrigan Simpson JBSA Fort Sam Houston Inspection Officer Inspection Officer Inspection Officer Inspection Officer Community Director Deputy Manager Deputy Director EPA Lead Inspector Signature/Date Supervisor Signature/Date ANGELA HAYS Date: 2024.12.1 0 06:48:22 -06'00' Digitally signed by ANGELA HAYS Angela Hays St UC key, Troy Digitally signed by Stuckey,Troy Date: 2024.12.10 08:54:31 -06'00' Troy Stuckey, Chief Date Date 6ENFORM-019-R8.2 (02/12/2020) 1 Section I - INTRODUCTION Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 PURPOSE OF THE INSPECTION To investigate facility for compliance with the Lead Based Paint Renovation, Repair or Painting (RRP) Rule and 1018 Disclosure Rule of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The inspection was initiated as part of a national initiative to inspect military bases identified to have reported elevated blood lead levels. FACILITY DESCRIPTION Fort Sam Houston Family Housing, located within Joint Base San Antonio, is managed by Hunt Military Communities. Hunt Military Communities (Hunt) manages 925 single family homes in 11 communities at Fort Sam Houston. Homes range in build dates from 1886 - 2006 and 434 of these homes are historic. Hunt offers housing to Active Duty, Retirees, Veterans, Department of Defence Employees, National Guard, Reservists, and other service members. Most leases are a 12-month term. Section II - OBSERVATIONS On October 21, 2024, at 9:20 AM, EPA inspectors Angela Hays, Stan Lancaster, Kiera Hancock, and Andrea Price arrived at the Fort Sam Houston Guard Post to make initial contact for an unannounced TSCA Lead Based Paint (LBP) Inspection at Fort Sam Houston Family Housing. Michael R. Mathers, Deputy Manager at Fort Sam Houston and Kerrigan Simpson, Deputy Director at Fort Sam Houston, met the EPA inspectors and escorted them to the Hunt Military Communities Office. EPA made entry at approximately 11:20AM. Upon entry, inspectors Hays, Lancaster, Hancock, and Price presented their credentials to Hunt Military Communities Director, Monica Garcia and explained the purpose of the inspection. The Notice of Inspection (Form 7740-3) was filled out and a copy provided to Ms. Garcia (Appendix 1). The interview began with discussions of the property types and build dates. The properties are all singlefamily homes with a potential for children under six and pregnant women to occupy. Build dates range from 1886 to 2006. EPA explained the focus of the investigation would be only on the properties built before 1978. The inspection team requested to review documents for compliance with the TSCA 1018 disclosure. A total of 69 leases were requested for review from a selection of pre-1978 properties. Ms. Garcia was unable to supply the files at the time of the site visit. A follow up of records was requested. Ms. Garcia was unaware if any lead-based paint testing was done in the past. Hunt Military Communities has been the Property Management Company at Fort Sam Houston for approximately 4 years. The inspection team then went on to discuss compliance with the TSCA RRP Rule. The RRP checklist was completed (Appendix 2). Ms. Garcia was unaware of Hunt's Lead Safe Firm Certification Number. Follow up of the number was requested. During the discussion, Ms. Garcia stated that typical painting work does not remove existing paint layers. Painting is performed by painting over the existing layer. If work is 2 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 needed that will disturb lead-based paint, Hunt hires vendors certified in LBP. Ms. Garcia stated Hunt employees do not perform RRP. EPA inspectors requested a copy of the standard operating procedures of how LBP is managed and the Contractor names, contact information, certifications, and assigned renovators used for LBP RRP work for the past five years. The inspection team then drove the residential areas within Fort Sam Houston to look for active RRP work. Mr. Mathews and Ms. Simpson escorted the EPA through the pre-1978 communities. EPA was provided maps of the Privatized housing and communities (Appendix 3). During the drive one residence located at 2857 Chaffee, San Antonio TX 78234 was found to be performing active work that had a potential for LBP disturbance. The work consisted of removal of painted wood and uncontained dust. The debris was not contained at the time of site visit (Appendix 4). Inspector Hays spoke to the worker onsite, Nixon Garcia. Mr. Garcia stated he was forking for M-D Flooring. Mr. Garcia said that he did not have training for lead-based paint and was unaware if a certified renovator was assigned to the project. Mr. Garcia stated that he had limited English and provided the name of M-D Floorings owner, Geraldo Gomez for additional information. The inspectors also found active work taking place at 2800 Chaffee Road, San Antonio, TX 78234. The contractor, JP Resurfacing, was painting a shower and did not seem to fall under the LBP requirements (Appendix 4). The inspectors conducted a closing conference and discussed the areas of concern found. The inspection team completed the Receipt for Sampling and Documents form (Appendix 5), the list of requested documents, and supplied lead-based --paint education materials to the facility. The inspection concluded at approximately 2:30PM. - Section III - AREAS OF CONCERN Hunt Military Communities contracted out work to M-D Flooring, who did not appear have proper LBP training. Hunt Military Communities at Fort Sam Houston does not appear to have a Lead Safe Firm Certification. Section IV - FOLLOW UP Documentation of the following information was requested by 10/28/2024. As of the publication of this report some of the documentation has been submitted to EPA and is under review. The remainder of the requested information submission has been extended to 12/13/2024. 1) Standard Operating Procedures Documentation of how RRP work is performed. 2) Hunt Military Communities Fort Sam Houston Lead Safe Firm Certification number. 3) List of lead contractors used for RRP in the past 5 years (Or since Hunt has managed property) including: Firm Certification Numbers Training Certifications Contact information. 4) Certified Renovator Names 3 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 5) Current Lease lead disclosures / addendums for 69 properties. Three from Staff Post Community Seven from Artillery Post Community One from Hancock Community Fourteen from Patch Chaffee Community Fourteen from Wheaton Gram Dickson Community Three from Gorgas Community Seven from Infantry Post Community Section V - APPENDIX Appendix 1 - Notice of Inspection (Form 7740-3) Appendix 2 - Lead RRP Compliance Checklist Appendix 3 - Maps of Communities Appendix 4 - Photo log Appendix 5 - Receipt for Samples and Documents (Form 7740-1) 4 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Appendix 1 Notice of Inspection (Form 7740-3) 5 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ~EPA Un I 1 l 1 ENVIROI ~MENTAL PROT CTION AGENCY w shf119ton DC n 60 Notice tf ln~pc><.tion OfCkc of (11forcc1ncnl and Compll nee A!.surnnc~ or the purpose of inspecting (including taking sampl~s. photographs, statements and other rnspectron ac11vllie 5l an e~lablishmla'rH. facility or other premises in whlrh chemical substancla's or mlxtures,articles containing same are m~nulactured, proces~d. stored or held beiore or after their d1strrbu1ton ,n commerce (Including records. files. P3P"f~. I[ , proc<>sses. control and facrlrues) and any conveyances ~ino used to transport chemical substance, mixtures or article~ co:1tainrng same In connection with the,r dlstrrbut1on ,n co~merce (Including records, files, papers. processes. controls and tartlit1s) bearing on whether the requ,rements of the Act are .,ppl1cable to the chemical substances. miY.tures or arti,;IPs, I within, or associated with, such premise or conveyance have been complied with . ,I- In addrlion, this 1nspect1on extends to (check appropnatP blocks) I n A Financr~I Data n 8. Sales Data C1 D Pi>rsonnel Data 17 E. Research Data n C Pricing Data I Tile n~ture and extent of Inspection of such data specified In A through Eabove Is as follows .I s.~t:,.,,,. ,011 Lee,.) 3~-tA Q.., :-..+ Inspector's Slgnat\Jfe .~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,,r Ji oar, -=- _IJ Save For in , ~ l 6 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Appendix 2 Lead RRP Compliance Checklist 7 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 1'J.Oom. : 1/:,t,.' u,i t-tr JI ;lo""" 'tr',u Ol'#tJ If . ,f),,.. ; r,.,,;;t.i~ %.,.._ ft 0 cad Rcnovntion/Rcpair/Painting ompliance / .)jrzf....," t? t!Wll hccklist - Renovators c.C(; US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 't U.S. EPA REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT .___ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___.___ TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTIO:=..:N..:._ _ _ _ _ Reno, alion Firms & Renovators lnsncclion C hecklist EPA lnsncctor Name EPA lnsucctor Telephone EPA Inspector Email Inspection Date 1nspcction Tvpc: Inspection Loca tion Name Address Contact Na me Contact Teleph one Con tact Email Mana !!er Name l\la nal!:er Teien hone Ma nal!:cr Email A.~,,. /4 r:l/..~, q,,.~ /,/1,,,~, ,/.._I... L ~ M -~ L V .L .J/,1,:: j ' 10/'J.f I :J.Y l/J.~ ~ML C-.- ,, - Firm In fo rm a ti on ,t\~11:,,. /.,..ft.,'4. - / xnrntN11~ t/t-au-,,v- /l'\l)(litt.. /w,ft.ic,. - l"mrn,,.,, rL tJ, 'u_.J...,y- . llrl- Cit/ - l.'t ?I 1"11it'l1,,; /-.hiL f! 1- L. ,,IWJJ'l.r. r. ~- Huvif- EPA Fi rm Cer tifi ca ti on Number Na ture/Descripti on of Work: /u15 r fl.fl-t" /h.-,J- w 1-tr..t. r'l'\ot'll,... 6,:,-,;<o(!' J.\'-<flh.JVYlf'Ml?> , {. ....... &v,, c.....t~ . /~-errl'.i<r. t1.s;1n,-uc,v, . c i t?c./fh'f rn , i Introduction & Purpose Permission to enter granted Permission to enter document signed Facility/operator provided copy of entry document Copy of Lead Base Paint Pamph let provided OPENING CON FERENCE Y-N- Co mm ents NIA y v'-I 11 :J I~ .R- M.iI v (X-.vtl,~iJ -6'<.Jn,J. Page 1 of 21 COMPANY NAME: _ _,_Hi..e:Lc".....J._ t _}'--=-'.>'-'H' - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - 8 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 I L ft r 0 U.S. EPA -- Comment. lnfom1a tion gathen:d: Lead Rcno\nlion/Rcpair/Painting Compliance hccklist - Renovators US ENVIRONMEl'ITAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION _ _ _ ___, Did the compan) cooper.lie and provide requested documents? ls_the compan) a licensed real estate brokerage !inn? If Ye . what is their license number? -IL lie\_., -klr,:! L'{ ... l f;,rb, t~,!{.-,,.;-lec, Doe, the company manage/sale/renovate target housing? I f yes. how many?_ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ q;J...s ll<-'f!'y Cu+ c.c ti Ct,,W)m'1r11\,2:1 A re there children under the age of 6 living in these properties? Under the age of 18? Pregnant women? If managing properties, has any renovations been performed on these properties in the past 5 years? Was list provided? - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - #4'1: c.ltSt.> JC1ht: lc,,C"- k>rt'> Le4th1 Vlt;,i>> .,_..i.1,,i mtut-,,7, Th: 8""'rt:!'laa~ OWi\ yfvjX171l, M.A L..,tR :;f-{., NJ, fJ1,.,J-}- 4t"l"v-v-<- ut C,,l)e fr,.mV\ II] t<,)lr. (l.n.P - \"1<t1)!) (ei:i=fft,.I,. i:? k~&lo 1,r+I,. LBP. Tyfi'tt..1/., ~,:, ~ , cw:A,,.. ~,J LJ<ufl:f) . Un,...,,.., ,..- 1,u,tl,~ elf flC&-' I r/':C Ifl t4t.,,~ / VJ:!IJYW .,,,~md -1.., -l!vll~{Jfl..f:vtgl, Hun+- ht:a, :t'c ic?D<Ml".l - All 1...t:tb " t, nW,.,te.U u,,+ {.;:, t.ceaiJ-, "'"' I of. Inspector: 6ECD T U Environmental Protection Agenc) Region 6 120 I Elm Street Dallas, TX 75207 Cop) o f inspection checklist and on-site report sent to: Print ;--.;amc: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ [mai l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Page 2 of 21 9 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 r ft 0 U.S. EPA Lead Renovation/Repair/Painting Compliance hcckli~t - Renovators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION ---~------- lNFORl\lATION DISTRlll UTION REQUIREMENTS # Rel!. Ref Question Y-N-N/A I 40 C .F R . Renovation in Dwellin g Unit: Did the renovator/property 745 84(a)( I) O\\ ncr pro pert) manager pro, idc the owner of the unit with the EPA-ao1Jro,ed lead hazard information oamphlct? R(lo'..., v-f Comments 2 40 C.F R 74 5 .84(a)(2) Reno, at ion in D" cllin g nit: Did the renovator/property O\\ncr/property manager provide the adult occupant of the unit (if occupant is not the owner) with the EPA-approved lead ,,. \cvJ ~-f rv\ huard information pamphlet? ~ Comments 3 40 C.F.R. 745.84(b)( I) Renovation in Common Arca: Did the renovator provide the property manager/owner of the multi-fam ily housing with the EPA-approved lead hazard information/pamphlet and/or to post informational signs? mult1family Comments 4 40 c .r .R. 745 .84(b)(2) Renovation in Common Arca : Did the renovator/property manager/property owner notify in writing. or ensure written notification of, each unit of the multi-family housing and make the pamphlet available upon request prior to the start ofthe renovation. and/or post informational signs? mullrfamily f-1 I(\ Comments 5 40 CF R. 745 .84(c)(l )(i) Renovation in C hild-Occupied Faci lity: Did the renovator/property manager provide the 0\\ner of the building in which the child-occupied facility is located with the EPA- annroved lead hazard information pamphlet? Child fac1l1ty ~I,.. C o mm e nts 6 40 C F.R. 745 .84(c)( I)(ii) Renova tion in C hild-O ccupied Facility: Did the renovator/property manager/ property O\\ ner provide an adu lt representative of the child occupied faci lity with the pamphlet, if the owner is not the operator of the chi ld-occupied fac ility? Chrld facrlrty ti I 1\ Comments 7 40 C.F.R. 745.84(c)(2) Renovation in C hild-Occupied Faci lity : Did the renovator/property manager/property owner provide the parents and/or guardians of chi ldren using the ch ild-occupied facility Cluld foc1hty ~,~ with the pamph let and information describing the genera l nature and locations of the renovation and the anticipated completion date, b) mailing or hand-<felivering the pamphlet and renovation information. orb) posting informational signs describing the general nature and locations of the renovation Page 3 of 21 coMPANYNAME _ _._tl~k~~l~c--'-r~~~d.__________________ 10 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft U.S. EPA Lc:1d Renovation/Repair/Painting ompliancc Checklist - Renovators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION and the anticipated completion date, posted m areas \vhcrc they can be seen by parents or guardians of the children frequentmg the child-occupied facility, and accompanied by a posted copy of the pamphlet or information on how interested parents or guardian s can review a copy of the pamphlet or obtain a copy from the renovation fim1 at no cost to the oarents or 1rnard1ans? Comments 8 40 C.F.R. All Renovatio ns: Did the renovator post signs clearly defining 745.85 (I) the work area and warning occupants and other persons not involved in renovation activities to remain outside of the work area; to prepare, to the extent practicable, signs in the primary language of the occupants; and/or to post signs before ~ \t,t,J f-v' ~ ~ \"' beginning the renovation and make sure they remain in place and readable until the renovation and the post-renovation cleanin[! verification have been comoleted? C o mm en ts TEST KITS # Ree Ref Qu e s tio n I 40 C.F.R. A ll Renova tions: D id the renovator/firm use an EPA approved 745 .88 dust test kit when determi ning the presence of lead, where the test kit prov ided an accurate result for the oresence of lead? Co mm e nts Y-N-N/A Jc1l e.,.:,, ~ FAJLURE TO ALLOW ACCESS TO RECORDS OR REFUSAL OF AN INSPECTION # Ree: Ref I 40 C.F.R. 745.87(c) Ou e s tion All Renovations: Did the renovator/ property owner/property manager refuse to permit entry or inspection? Fai lure or refusal to permit entry or inspection is also a violation ofTSCA 15 Y-N-N/A y and TSCA 6409. Comments FA ILURE TO E TA BLISH AND MAINTALN RECORDS, FAILU RE OR REF s LTO MAKE RECORDS AVAILABLE # Ree Ref Qu e s tion Y-N-N/ A I 40C.F.R. 745 .237 A ll Renovations: Did the renovator/fi rm/property owner/property manager fai l or refusal to establ ish and maintain records, or to make avai lable such record ? uch failure or p1.:w I) refusal is a violation ofTSCA 6 409. C o m m e nt s Page 4 of 21 COMPANY NAME. _____,___-'-'U""ru.J_f,._~ f'----"-)--H'-' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 r L ad Renova tion/Repair/Painting Compliance 'hcckli t - Renovator. US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY U.S. EPA REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 7S202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION ~-----------~------- CKNOWLEDG EME T D ERTIFIC TIO TATEME TREQ rRE 1E TS <RENOVATION PAMPHLET) # Rel! Ref Question Y-N-N/A I 40 C.f.R. Renovation in Dwelling Unit: Did the rcnovator/ finn/property Owner 745.84(a)( I)(i) manager obtain, from the owner, a written acknowledgment occupied 40 .F. R. 745.84(a)( I) ofmailin_g at least 7 days prior to the renovation? that the owner had received the pamphlet, or obtain a certificate W//r Comments 2 40 C.F.R. Renovation in Dwelling Unit: Did the renovator/finn/property 745.84(a)(2) manager obtain, from the adult occupant, a written acknowledgment that the adult occupant has received the 40 C.F.R. pamphlet, or obtain a certificate of mailing at least 7 days prior 74S.84(a)(2)(i) to the renovation? rental ~,~ Comments 3 40 C.F.R. Renovation in Common Area: Did the 745.84{b)(I) renovator/firm/property manager obtain, from the owner, a written acknowledgment that the owner has received the 40 C.F.R. pamphlet, or that information signs have been posted, or obtain 745 .84(b)( I)(i) a certificate of mailing at least 7 davs orior to the renovation? Multi-family rJ I k Comments 4 40 C.F.R. Renovation in Common Area: Did the 745.84(b)(3) renovator/firm/property manager prepare, sign, and date a statement describing the steps performed to notify all occupants of the intended renovation activities and to provide Mul li-family tJ IP. the pamphlet? Comments s 40 C.F.R. 745 .84(b)(4) Renovation in Common Area: Did the renovator/firm/property manager notify, in writing, the owners and occupants of the scope, locations or expected starting and ending dates of the planned renovation activities change after the initial notification, before the renovator initiated work beyond that which was described in the ori ginal notice? Mul 1i-fornily tJ I~ Comments 6 40 C.F. R. 745. 84 (c)( I)( i) Renovation in Child-Occupied Facility: Did the renovator/firm /property manager obtain, from the owner of the building. a written acknowledgment that the owner had received the pamphlet, or obtained a certifi cate of mailing at least 7 days prior to the renovation? Child Facility f} /Ii Co mments Page 5 of 21 COMPANY NAME: __~H~v,_,~I~t~-'.l~il_______________ 12 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft 0 U.S. EPA Lead Renova tion/Repair/Pa inting ompliance hecklist - Renovators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DAUAS, Tl( 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 7 40 C.l R. Rcnm ation in Child-Occupied Facility: Did lhe Child Fac1hcy 745.84(c}( 1)(ii) renovator/firm/property owner/property manager oblain from an adult representative of the child occupied facility, if the operator of the child-occupied faci lity i not the owner of the bui ldmg, a written acknowledgment that the operator has lj\\- received the pamphlet. or obtained a certificate of mai ling at least 7 davs orior to the renovation? Comments 8 40 C.F.R. Renovation in Child-Occu pied Facility: Did the Child Fac,hl)' 745.84(c)(3) and date a statement describing the steps performed to noti fy all renovator/firm/property owner/property manager prepare, sign }:. /~ parents and guardians of the intended renovation activities and to orovide the pamphlet? Comments 9 40 C.F.R. All Re novations: Did the renovator/firm/property 745.84(d)(l) owner/occupant's name and acknowledgment of the pamph let owner/property manager include a statement recording the -rJ Ir. receipt prior to the start of the renovation, the address of the unit undergoing renovation, the signature of the owner or occuoant as aoolicable, and the date of signature? Co mm e nts RECORD RETENTION REOUfREMENTS # Ree Ref Question I 40 C.F.R. All Renovations: Did the renovator/fi rm/property 745.86 manager/property owner retain all records necessary to demonstrate compliance with the residential property renovation for a period of3 years fo llowing completion of the renovation activities? Comments 2 40 C.F.R. All Renovations: Did the training program maintain and make 745.225 (i) available to EPA upon request, records for a period of3 years and 6 months? Comments 3 40 C.F. R. Target Housing and Chilcl-occupied Facilities: did the 745.225, renovator/firm/property manager/property owner/training 745.226, or activity fai l or refuse to establish, maintain. provide copy, or 745.227 & 40 permit access to records or reports? C.F.R. 745.235 (b) Page 6 of 21 Y-N-N/A f.,11-" -.!f r.,,1c ..... 1.,,tf folkw-' vf COMPANY NAME: _ _ _...c/..ic=-11..,_~--'f-'-.'.)c....f,_/,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 13 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 r U.S. EPA cad Rcnova tion/Rcp:iir/Pa inting ompliancc hccklist - Rcno\-ators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTI:CTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 7SZ02 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION Comment ~ # Ree Ref CERTI FICATION AN D RELAT ED R EQ UIR EMENTS Quest ion I 40 C.F R. II Renovatio ns: Did the renovator/ firm that performs, offer 74 .89(n) or claims to perform renovations or dust sampling for pur uant 10 40 compen ation obtain initial certification from EPA? If the firm CFR did not obtain initial certification, then proceed next section. 745.81 (a)(2)(ii) Comm ents 2 40 CFR All R enova tions: If initial certification has e,pired, did the 745.89(a& 40 EPA-certified cease renovations or dust sampling upon C.F.R. e,piration of certification? 745.89/b)( I)(iii) C o mme n ts 3 40 C.F.R. All Renovations : Did fi rm amend cert ification w ithin 90 days 745.89(b). & 40 of pertinent information change? Did Lhe fi rm halt renovations C.F.R. or dust ampling until its certi fication was amended? 745.89(c) Y-N-N/A /:die,..> if folio,.> vf i=dloJ-1 vf Co m m ents 4 40 C.F.R. 745.89(d)( I) & All Renovatio ns: Are all ind ividuals performing renovations certified renovators or trained by certified renovators? 40 C.F.R. 745.81 (a)(2) Comments s 40 C F.R. All Renovations : Is a certified renovator assigned to and 745.89(d)(2) & avai lable at each renovation? 40 C .F.R 745.8 l<a)/2) Comm ents 6 40 C.F.R. 745.90(b) or (c) All Renovatio ns: Did the certified renovator or dust sampling technician ensure compliance with 745.85 at all renovations to 40 CFR which they were assigned? 745.90(a) .~Fc11,;,..v f<;\lt.w Ii(' re. :e..v L j' 40 C.F.R. 745.8 l(a)(3) Co mments Page 7 of 21 coMPANv NAME. _ _ _.....,f....,_~=1,ou.L.l:__._t~)..H, .,___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 14 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 U.S. EPA Lead Rcnov:ition /Rcpair/Painling Compliance hccklis t - Renovator. US (NVIRONMENTAl PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 7S202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 1 ; 40 crn \II Rcno,ations: Did the renovator or du\l sampling 745 QO(b)(7) technician. perform mg renovator or du~t ~am piing respon5ibilitie under 40 CF R. 745 .90(b) or (c) lo maintain and make available copies of their cour e completion ccrtificate(s) (proofof certification) at the work site? Comment, 8 40 CF R. All Renovations : Did the du I sampling technician lo perform 745 .90(c} opuonal du t clearance sampling under 745.85(c)? Comments 9 40 CF R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745 .8 I (a}(3) previously EPA-certified individual stop directing renovations ifhe/she did not obtain recertification under 40 CFR 745.90(a)(4)? Comments (oilcw .p (.//cW r (.,I /ct,, c.,,p WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR CO DUCTING RENOVATIONS IF RENOVATIONS DID NOT OCCUR TI IrS SECTION IS NIA Rei! Ref Questio n Y-N-N/A I 40 C.F.R. I nterior Renova tions: Did the renovation firm remove all 745.8S(a)(2)(i)( objects from the work area, including furniture, rugs, and N A) 1,indo11 coverings, or cover them with plastic sheeting or other impermeable material with all seams and edges taped or otherw ise sea led? Comments 2 40CF.R. Interior Renovati ons: Did the renovation firm, before 745.8S(a)(2)(i}(B beginning the renovation, close and cover all ducts opening in t-1 ) the 11ork area with taped-down plastic sheeting or other imocrmeable material? Comments 3 40 C.f.R. I nterior Renovations: Did the reno ation fim1 close windows 745.85(a}(2)(i)(C and door in the work area. cover doors with plastic sheeting or N ) other impermeable material, and/or cover doors used as an entrance to the work area w ith plastic sheeting or other impemieable material in a manner that allows workers to pa~s through while confi ning dust and debris to the work area? Com ments 4 40 C.F R. Interi or Renovat ions: Did the renovation firm , before t-J 745 .85(a)(2)(i)( beginning the renovation. cover the Ooor surface, including D) installed carnet. with taoed-do" n ola~tic sheeting or other Page 8 of 21 COMPANY NAME: ----~Y~L'~'1~f_- _,t.-._-')'-'-H_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 15 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 r ft U.S. EPA Lead lh'novation/ l{epair/Painting Compliance hecldi I - Renovator~ US ENVIRONMENTAL PROHCTION AGENCY REGION 6, DAUAS, T)( 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION impcm1cablc material in the work area 6 feet beyond the pcnmctcr of \Ur faces undergoing renovation or a sufficient di,tancc to contain the du~t. whichc~cr i\ greater? Comments 5 40 C.F R. I nterior Renovations: Did the renovation fim1 use precauuons 745.s-(a)(2)(i)(E to ensun: that all personnel, tools. and other items, including the f.o,lo.v.,J,, ) c:-.tcriors ofcontainers of" astc. are free of dust and debris before leaving the work area? Com ments 6 40 C.F.R. Ext erior R enovati ons: Did the renovation firm, before 74S.85(a)(2)(ii)( beginning the renovation. close all doors and windows within "1/ A A) 20 feet of the renovation. close all doors and windows within 20 feet of the renovation on the same Door as the renovation on multi-story bui ldings, and/or close all doors and windows on all Doors below that are the same horizontal distance from the renovation? Comments 7 40 C.F.R. Exterior Renovati ons: D id the renovation firm, before 745.85(a)(2)(ii)( beginning the renovation, ensure that doors within the work B) area that will be used whi le the job is being performed are covered with plastic sheeting or other impermeable material in a manner that allows workers to pass through while confining 1J / dust and debris to the work area? C om m en t s 8 40 C.F.R. Exterior Renovations: D id the renovation firm, before 745.85(a)(2)(i i)( beginning the renovation, cover the ground w ith plastic NI (, C) sheeting or other disposable impermeable material extending I 0 feet beyond the perimeter of urfaces undergoing renovation or a sufficient distance to collect fa ll ing paint debris, whichever is greater, unless the propert} line prevents I O feet of such ground covering? Comments 9 40 C.F.R. Exterior Renovations: Did the renovation firm , before N/f. 745.8S(a)(2)(ii)( beginni ng the renovations in certai n situations, take extra D) precautions in containing the work area to ensure that dust and debris from the renovation does not contaminate other building or other areas of the oroocrtv or migrate to adjacent proper11es? Comments Page 9 of 21 COMPANY NAME ____t_l-k'~O~t~f~)~~-------------- 16 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft U.S. EPA --- cad Reno nlion/Rcpair/Painting Compt]ancc hccklist - Renovators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALI.AS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 10 40 .F.R. Prohibited and restricted practices: Did the renovator/firm 74 .85(a)(3)(i) prohibit the use of open-name burning or torching of lead- based tJaint durinu renovations? C o m m e n ts II 40 C.F.R. Prohibited a nd restricted practices: Did the renovator/firm 74 .85(a)(3)(ii) prohibit the use of machines that remove lead-based paint through high speed operation such as sanding. grinding, power planning, needle gun, abrasive blasting, or sandblasting. unless such machines are used with IIEPA exhaust control? Comments 12 40 C.F.R. Prohibited and restricted practices: Did the renovator/firm 745.85(a)(3)(i ii) restrict the operating/use of a heat gun on lead-based paint to temoeratures below 1100 degrees Fahrenheit? C o mm ents 13 to 40 C.F.R. Waste from renovations: Did the renovator/firm contain waste 745.85(a)(4)(i) from renovation activit ies to prevent releases of dust and debris before the waste is removed from the work area for storage or disposal and/or fa ilure to cover a chute ifit is used to remove waste from the work area? Comments 14 40 C.F.R. Waste from renovations: Did the renovator/firm, at the 745.85(a)(4)(ii) conclusion of each work day and/or at the conclusion of the renovation, ensure that waste that had been collected from renovation activities was stored under containment, in an enclosure, or behind a barrier that prevents re lease of dust and debris out of the work area and prevents access to dust and debris? Comments 15 to 40 C.F.R. Waste from renovations: Did the renovation firm contain the 745.85(a)(4)(iii) waste to prevent release of dust and debris during the tran port of waste from renovation activities? Co m m e n ts 16 40 C.F.R. C lea ning the work area: Did the renovation firm c lean the 745 .85(a)(5) work area until no d ust, debris or residue remained af\er the renovation had been comoleted? Co mments J 40 C.F.R. C lea nin g tbc work area: did the renovation firm col lect all 745 .85(a)(S)(i)( pa int chips and debris and seal the material in a heav -dtll) bag Al without dispersinJ: any of it? Co mm ents 1-1 ~ ~ i:-o 110,u vf Follov> 11r [u1l0~ L'f"' Fci10t" ur Follv;"' llt Page 10 of 21 COMPANYNAME ----1~+L~1?~t-'-F:.~~~'~'------------- 17 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 r ft 0 U.S. EPA ca d Rc11ov11tio11/Rcpair/ Pninting ompliancc hccklist - Renova tors US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, OALIAS, TX 7S202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 18 40 CI R Clcanini: the \\ Ork area: Did the renovation firm remove the 745.85(a)(-)(i)(B proIccti,c \heeling b) misting the ~heeling before folding it, ) folding the din} idc inward, and/or euhcr taping shut to seal or scaling it in heavy-duty bags? Com ments 19 .JO C.F.R Cleaning the work area . Did thi: renovation firm keep in place 745 .85(a)(S)(i)(B the plastic sheeting used 10 isolate contaminated rooms from ) non-conta111inated rooms until afier the cleaning and rem oval of other sheeting? Comments 20 40 C.F.R. C leaning the ,,ork area: Did the renovation firm dispose o f 745 85(a)(S)(i)(B the plastic sheeting, used as occupant protection al the ) renovation site. as waste? Comments 21 40 C.F.R. Cleaning the work area: Did the rcnovaIion fir111 clean all 745.85(a)(5)(ii) objects and surfaces in the work area and within 2 feet ofthe work area. cleaning from higher to lower? Comments 22 40 C.F.R. C leani ng the work area: Did lhe renovation fir111 clean walls 745 .8S(a)(5)(i i)( in Ihe work area, staning at the cei ling and working down to the A) floor, by either vacuu111ing with a I IEPA vacuum or wiping with a da111p cloth? Com ments 23 40 C.F.R. Cleaning the work area: Did the rcnovaIion firm thoroughly 745.85(a)(5)(ii)( vacuu111 all remaining surfaces and objects in the work area, B) including furniture and fixtures, with a I I EPA vacuum and/or failure to use a H EPA vacuum equipped with a beater bar when vacuu111mg caroets and ru!!s? Commen ts 24 40 C.F.R. Cleani ng the wor k ar ea: Did the renovation firm to wipe all 745 .85(a)(S)(ii)( re111aining surfaces and objects in Ihe work area, except for C) carpeIed or upholstered surfaces, wiIh a da111p clolh and/or failure to 111op uncarpcted fl oors Ihoroughly . using a mopping method 1haI keeps the wa h water separate from the rin se waler, such as the 2-bucket mopping meIhod, or u ing a\\ ct mopping svstem? Co mm ents 25 40 c.r R SIand ards for post- r enova tion cleanin g verifica tion : Did Ihe 745.85(b)( I )(i) renornIor perform a vi ual in pection o f the inIcrior \\ Ork area to deIem1ine "hcther dust debris or residue is sIill present 10 Page 11 of 21 h1lo.,., v(' h,1~..J uP F"ull~ Vf i="c,(/c:.,., llf ,:::,110 .... uP Foll ur - 1-o/lcW vp F'oll, -> LJf COMPANY NAME: -----'-~~li""l''-"-\:-_,__f~Sul..1..\_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 18 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft U.S. EPA ad R novation/Repair/Painting omplianc] hecklist - Renovator US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, CALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION rem ove du st. debri or re idue by re-cleanin g if necessary, and/or ocrform another vi sual inspection? Comments 26 40 C.F.R. tandard. for pos t- re no atio n cleani ng veri fi cation: Did the 74 .8 "(b)( I)(ii)( renovator verify that each interior windowsill in the work area A) ha been adequately cleaned using a disposable cleaning cloth(s) compared to the cleaning verification card following the pre cribed procedures, pursuant to 40 C .F.R. 745 .85 (b)( I)(ii) (A) or failure by a certified renovator to arrange for the collection dust clea rance sampl es as part of optional dust clearance testing? Co mments 27 40 C.F.R. Standards for post-renovation cleaning verifica ti on: Did the 745 .85(b)( I)(ii)( B) renovator fail to verify that eac h interior floor in the work area has been adequate ly cleaned us ing a disposable cleaning cloth(s) compared to the cleani ng verification card following the prescribed procedures pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 745 .85 (b)(l)( ii) (B) or fai lure by a ce rtified renovator to arrange for the collection dust clearance sa mpl es as part of optional dust clearance testing? Comments 28 40 C.F.R. Standard s for pos t- renovation cleaning verification: Did the 745.85(b)( I)(iii) renovator wai t until interior wo rk area passes post-renovation cleaning verification before removi ng sie:ns? Com ments 29 40 C.F.R. Standards for post- renovation cleaning verification: Did the 745.85(b)(2) renovator perform a visual inspection of th e exterior work area to determine whethe r du st, debris or res idue is till present, to remove dust, debri or res idu e by re-cleaning if nece sary, and/or perform anoth er visual insoect ion? Com ments 30 40 C.F. R. Stand a rd s for po t- renovation clea ning verification: Did the 745.85(b)(2) renovator wai t unti I ex terior work area passe vi ual inspection before removin g sig ns? Co mments 31 40 C.F.R. 745 .85(c) Standard fo r pos t- renovation cleaning verification : Did th renovation fi rm arrange for perfo rm ance of opti ona l du l clea rance testing at the co nclu ion of'lhe reno ation if required to do so by the per o n co ntractin g for the r nova ti on, a Fed 'faL State, Territoria l, Tr ibal, or loca l law or rcRulation? F"'''";_,) t,f (.,,low c>f rc/1"..J cf Fell~.., f ~"ll"v vf f, II''" -f Page 12 of 21 COMPANY NAME: _ __ _ __,_/1~1,.,1_1-'-"''f---'t'--~5.f./.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 19 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft '& U.S. EPA cad Rcnovation/Repair/Painling ompliancc hccklisl - Renova tors US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD RE:D.::.U::.C.::.T:.:1.O::.:N.:~ - - - - ' Comments 32 40 C.F.R. Standards for posl- rc110, atio11 clean in g verification: Did the 74. 8S(c)(:!) reno,ator have the optional dust clearance tesung performed by a certified in pector, risk assessor or dust sampling technician at the conclusion of the renovation? Com ments 33 40 C.F R Standard for post-re11ovation cleani ng verificatio n: Did the 74 .85(c)(3) renovation firm re-clean the work area until dust clearance results are below clearance standards? Comments (Jlr-w vt' ,:::J,t6,.,.....,., INSPECTION/RISK ASSESMENT/ABATEMENT WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS APPLICABLE ONLY IF CERTIFlED INSPECTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS OCCUR.ED # Re!! Ref Quest ion Y- N - N/ A I 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(a)( I) renovator/ lim, perform all lead-based paint activities pursuant to the work practice standards, appropriate requirements, ti/ methodolo1Ties and clearance levels soecilied and referenced? Comments 2 40 C.F.R. 745.227(a)(2) Target Housing and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the renovator/firm ensure lead-based paint activity described by the certified individual as an inspection, lead-hazard screen, risk ~/ assessment or abatement, was performed by a certified indiv idual? Comments 3 40 C.F. R. 745.227(b)( I) Target Housing and C hild-occupied Facilities: D id the renovator/ firm ensure an inspection was conducted only by a 't1 IA person certi lied by EPA as an inspector or risk assessor and, if conducted. must be conducted acco rding to the prescribed orocedures? Com ments 4 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occ upied Facilities: Did the If IA 745.227(b)(2) renova1or/lim1 conduct an inspection at select locations according to documented methodo logie 10 be tested for the oresence of lead-based oaint? Comments 5 40 C.F. R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Diel the 74S.227(b)(2)/il renovator/firm test for lead-based oai111 eac h interior and/or ~/A Page 13 of 21 coMPANv NAME _ _ _ _--1.Hi.!..I...Lo.w1-_.!..F..t.">..!..!Ht____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 20 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft ~ U.S. EPA cad Rc11ova tio11/Rcp. ir/Painting omp]iance Chccl< li, t - Renova tors US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT ,____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....__ _ _ _ TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION e.\terior component with a dist111ct painting hi tory in a residential cl\\elling and/or child occunied facility? Comments 6 40 C.F.R. Target llou ing and Child -occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(b)(2)(ii) renovator/firm test for lead-ba ed paint each interior and/or exterior component with a di tinct painting history in a multi- family dwelling? Commen ts 7 40 C.F.R. Target Hou ing and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the 745 .227(b)(3)(i) renovator/fim1 ensure that paint am pied for analysis to determine the presence of lead was conducted using documented methodologies which incorporate adequate quality control procedures? Comm ents 8 40 C.F.R. Ta rget Ho usi ng and Chi ld -occupied Facili ties: Did the 745 .227(b)(3)(ii) renovator/firm ensure that all collected paint chip samples were analyzed accord ing to 40 C.F.R. 745 .227(t) Lo determine if they contain detectable leve ls of lead that can be quantified numerically? Comments 9 40 C.F.R. 745 .227(b)(4) Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the inspector or risk assessor prepare an inspection report that includes the requi red information? Com ments 10 40 C.F.R. 745 .227(c)( I) Target Housin g and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the renovator/firm ensure that a lead hazard screen was conducted only bv a oerson certified bv EPA as a risk assessor? Comments JI 40 C.F.R. Ta rge t Hous ing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(c)(2)(i) renovato r/firm ensure that a lead hazard screen included the collection of backgro und information regardin g the physical characteristics of the res identi al dwe lling or child-occupied fac il ity and occupant use patterns that may cause lead-based oaint exposure to one or more child ren age 6 yea rs and under? Com ments 12 40 C.F.R. Target Hou ing and Chi ld-occ upied Facilitie : Did the 745.227(c)(2)(ii) renovator/firm ensure a lead hazard crcen include a vi ual (A) in soect.ion to deterrn ine the oresencc of deterioraicd paint? Co mments ~,1 tJ It- l-l If\ 1-l I\ r-, l\\ f\l I\\ t-1/~ Page 14 of 21 COMPANY NAME : ----~H~(~>r1~t~t~.''-->t i " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft cad Renovation/Repair/Pa inting ompliance hrck lisl - Renovators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY U.S. EPA REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT ~------------....__ ____TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 13 40 C.F R.. Target Ho using and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227( )(2)(ii) reno ator/firm ensure a lead hazard screen includes a visual (B) in pection to locate al least two dust samples performed accordinu to the orescribed methodologies? Commen ts 14 40 C.F.R. Target Housing a nd C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(c)(3) renovator/finn ensure a lead hazard screen includes the collection and analysi of dust samples according to the orescribed methodologies? Comments 15 40 C.F. R. Target Housi ng and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(c)(4) renovator/finn ensure a lead hazard screen includes the co llection and analysis of paint samples according to the orescribed methodologies? Comments 16 40 C.F.R. 745 .227(c)(5) Target Housing and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the renovator/firm ensure a risk assessor prepared a lead hazard screen report that includes the required information found in the regulation? Comments 17 40 C.F.R. 745 .227(d)(1) Target Housing and C hild-occupied Facilities: Did the renovator/firm ensure a risk assessment was conducted o nly by a person certified bv EPA as a risk assessor? Comments 18 40 C.F. R. 745.227(d)(2) Ta rget Housing and Child-occupied Facilitie : Did the renovator/firm ensure that a risk assessment includes a visual inspection of the residential dwelling or child-occupied facility to locate the existence of deteriorated paint, assess the extent and causes of the deteriora tion, and other potential lead-based paint hazards? Comm ents 19 40 C.F.R. Target Housing a nd C hild-occupied F acilities: Did the 745 .227(d)(3) renovato r/firm ensure that a lead hazard screen includes the collection of background information regarding the phy ical characteristics of the residential dwel ling or child-oc upied fac ility and occupant use patterns that may cause lead-ba ed oaint exoosure to one or more children age 6 years and under? Comments / rJ//\ rJ '1' t-J/~ tv Irt 1-J Irf rJ/ I\ Page 15 of 21 COMPANY NAME - - - - - ~H'-'.-.L._1..)....l..__.._t...,_')..L1.1;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 22 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 -ft U.S. EPA L ad Renovation/ Repair/Painting ompliance hcckli t - Renovator US ENVIRONMENT Al PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DAUAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 20 40 C.F.R. 745.227(d)(4) Ta rget Hous in g and hild-occupi cd Faciliti : Did the renovator/firm test for the presence of lead on each surface dctennined to have a disti nct painting history? C o m m e nt s 21 40 .F. R. 74- .227(d)(5) Residential Dwelling : Did the renovator/finn collect and analyze for lead concentration dust samples (either composite or ingle-surface am ples) from the interior window sill(s) and floor(s) in all living areas where one or more children, age 6 and under, are most likely to come into contact with dust? Co mments 22 40 C.F. R. 745.227(d)(6) Mu lti-family Dwell ings a nd Child-occupied Facilitic : Did the renovator/firm collect and analyze interior window sill and floor dust am ples (either composite or single-surface samples) for lead concentration from the prescribed locations? Comments 23 40 C.F. R. 745.227(d)(7) Child-occupied Facili ties: Did the ren ovator/firm collect and analyze interior window sill and noor dust samples (either composite or si ngle-surface samples) for lead concentration in each room, hall way or stairwell uti lized by one or more children, age 6 and under, and in other common areas in the chi ld occupied faci lity? Comments 24 40 C.F .R. 745.227(d)(8) Target Ho usin g and Child-occupied Facilities: Did th e renovator/firm collect and ana lyze soil samples for lead concentrations in the prescribed locat ions? Comm ents 25 40 C.F.R. 74- .227(d)(9) Ta rget Ho usin g and C hild-occupied Facilities : Did the renovator/firm conduct all paint, dust, or soil sampling or testi ng using documented methodologies that incorporate adequate qual ity control procedures? Commen ts 26 40 C.F.R. Ta rge t Ho usin g and Child-occupied Facili ties: Did th e 745.227(d)(l0) renovator/firm analyze any collected paint chip, du t, ors ii samples accordi ng to 40 C.F.R . 745 .227(f) to determine if they contain detectable levels of lead that can be quantified numerica lly? Com ments 27 40 C.f-.R. 745 .227(d)( 11 Target Ho usin g :i nd Child-occ upied Facilit ies: Did the renovator/firm/ri sk as e so r prepare a ri k a cs mcnt rep rt that includes the req uired in fo rm ation? ,-ii tl I ti I f. 1-11 \JI\\ i'l\~ t-1 l ~ tl \I\ Page 16 of 21 coMPANY NAME:-----~i~lu~n~t~E_s'--'H"----------- 23 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 -ft U.S. EPA .___ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ ad Rcno ation/Rcpair/Pninting ornplinnce he ldi~t - neno ators US EN\IIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT -1.._ _ _ _ _T.:.:l.T.:..L::.E: IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION Comment~ 2 40 C.F.R. Tar~ t llousinit and C hild-occup ied Faci liti es: Did the 74"._27(c)(I) reno ator/fim1 en urc that an aba tement is conducted only by a person certified by EP . and , if conducted, is conducted occordinu to the orescribcd oroccdurcs? Comments 29 40 C.F.R. 7C227(e)(2) Targe t Hou ing a nd C hild-occupi ed Fa ci liti es: Did the firm ensure a certified renovator wa available to be onsite for each abatement project during all work site preparation, during the po t-abatement cleanup of work areas, and to be onsite at other times during the abatement or available by telephone, pager or answering service and able to be presen t at the work site in no more than 2 hours? Co mm ents 30 40 C.F.R. 7C227(e)(3) Target Hou sing and C hild -occupied Facilities: Did the finn ensure a certified renovator was avai lable to direct activities and ensure that all abatement acti vities are conducted according to the requ irements of 40 C. F.R. 745.227(e) and all other Federal. State and loca l reauirements? Comm ents 31 40 C.F.R. 745.227(e)(4)(i- Ta rget Housing a nd C hild-occupied Faciliti es: Did the renovation firm noti fy EPA o f lead-based paint abatement v) activities or to update notifi cati on as prescribed and by the designated deadl ine? Comments 32 40 C.F.R. Ta rget Housi ng and Chi ld -occ upied Facilitie : Diel the 745 .227(e)(4)(vi) renovation firm include the des ignated in formation in each no tificatio n? Comments 33 40 C.F. R. Target Housin g and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745 .227(e)(4)(vii certified fi rm accompli sh written or electroni c not ification via ) one of the prescri bed meth ods? Comments 34 40 C.F.R. Target Housin g and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745 .227(e)(4)( ii renovat ion firm begi n lead-based paint abatement acti vities on i) the date and at the location specified in either the origina l or uodated Noti ficatio n? Comments 3- 40 C.F. R. Target Ho using a nd Child-occ upi ed Fac ilities: Did the 745 .227(e)(4\/ix\ certified ren ovation fi rm or individ ual notify EPA before Page 17 of 21 rJ Ir-- iJ It\ iJ Ifl rJ l I\ ~ Ir, tJ IP< rJ II\ tJ 1ft COMPANYNAME: -------+-H.uku.O.u+__.f~:?..,_L'f:!l.:- - - - - - - - -- - - 24 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft U.S. EPA ad R nova tio n/Rc pa ir/Pain ting ompliancc hccklist Renovators US ENVIRONMEflfTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, OAUAS, TX 75202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDU CTI ON engaging in lcad-ba ed paint abatement ac11vitics defined in 40 c.r-.R. 6 745 .223? Comm ents 36 40 C.F.R. Target ll ou ing a nd C hild -occ upi ed Facilit ies: Did the 745 .2_7(e)(5) certified renovation firm or in div idual deve lop a written occu pant protectio n plan fo r all abatement project and in accordance wi th the oresc ribed orocedures? Comm ents 37 40 C.F. R. 745.227(e)(6)(i) T arget Housing a nd C hi ld-occupied Facilit ies: Did the certified firm/renovator prohibit the use o f open-fl ame burn ing or torching of lead-based oaint durin g abatement activit ies? Co mm e nts 38 40 C.F. R. Target Housi ng a nd C hil d-occupied Faci lities: Did the 745.22 7(e)(6)( ii ) certified firm /renovator prohibit the use of machines that rem ove lead-based pai nt through sand ing, grinding, abras ive blasting, or sandb lasti ng, un less such machines are used w ith HE PA exhaust control whi ch removes pa rt icles of0.3 micron s or lamer from the air at 99.97 oercent or greater efficiencv? Comm ents 39 40 C.F. R. Target Ho usin g and Child-occupi ed Facilities: Did the 745.22 7(e)(6)( iii certified fi rm/renovator prohibit th e dry scrapin g of lead -based ) paint unless it is used in conjuncti on wi th heat guns or around electrica l outl ets or when treating defective paint spots tota li ng no mo re th an 6 square feet in any one roo m, hall way, or sta irwell or totalin g no more than 20 squ are feet on exterior s urfaces ? Comm ents 40 40 C.F. R. Ta rget Ho usin g and Child -occupied Fa cilities : Did th e 745.22 7(e)(6)(iv) certi fied firm/renovator restrict the operating ofa heat gun on lead-based paint at temperatures be low 11 00 degrees Fa hre nh e it ? Com ments 4 1 40 C.F.R. 74 5 .22 7(e)(7) Ta rget Hou in g a nd C hild -occ upied Fa cilities: Di d th e certi fi ed !inn /renovator cond uct soil abatement , wh en necessarv, accordin g to the prescribed meth ods? Co mm ents 42 to 40 C.F. R. 745 .227(e)(8) Ta rge t Ho usi ng a nd C hild-occupied F aci liti es: Di I th e ce rtified fi rm/renova tor ha ea certifi ed inspector or ri k assessor oerfo rm the post-abatement clearance 1Jroceclures? Co mm ents tl ,~ ~ '"' t-1 I\\ t-1 \~ t-1 (\\ t-i l (\ iJ \\\ Page 18 of 21 COMPANY NAME: _ _ _ _----'--'H=u.,_,1_,.,_f_,_,_B<..J.l.1.1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 25 ,,,- . Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 U.S. EPA nd Rcnovn tion/Rcpuir/Pninting omplinncc hccklist - Renova tor US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DALLAS, TX 7S202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 43 40 C.F R. ~ 74 .227(e)(8)(i) Tar,::ct Housing and hild-occupicd Facilities: Did the certified firm have an inspector or ri k a\scssor to perform a vi~ual in,pection aflcr abatement to determine ifdeteriorated painted urface~ and/or isiblc amounts ofdust, debris or re idue arc still present and to remove any hazards that still remain? Comments 44 40 F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilitie : Did the 745.227(e)(8)(ii) certified firm/renovator wai l umil the required visual in pcction and any nece ary post-abatement cleanups were completed before performing clearance sampling for lead in dust? Comments 45 40 .F.R. Target Housina a nd Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(e)(S)(ii i certified fim1/renovator take dust samples for clearance ) purpo es using documented methodologies that incorporate adeauate auality control procedures? Comments 46 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(e)(8)(iv) certified firm/renovator wait a minimum of I-hour after completion of final post-abatement cleanup activities to collect dust samples for clearance purposes? Comments 47 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 74 .227(e)(8)(v) certified firm/renovator collect the required dust samples from (A) the prescribed surface in the designated rooms after conducting an abatement with containment between abated and unabated areas? Com ments 48 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745.227(e)(S)(v) certified firm/renovator collect the required dust sample from ( B) the prescribed surfaces in the designated room after conducting an abatement with no containment? Commen ts 49 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilitie : Did the 745.227(e)(8)(v) certified firm/renovator conduct a visual inspection and clean ( ) horizontal, outdoor surfaces or visible du t and debri . perform visual inspection for paint chips on the dripline and remo e and properly dispo e ofany paint chip fo und followi ng an exterior oaint abatement? Com ments rv I" ti 1\ iv I~ r-JI ~ ~II\ tJ 111 tJ I\\ Page 19 of 21 COMPANY NAME. _ _ _ ___,1...i.:4l.,,/l).u.t--1.f--'':l!..I.H.!__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 26 I Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft U.S. EPA ad Reno ntion/Rcpair/Painting ompliance hcckli t - Renovator US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6, DAUAS, TX 75202 TOX IC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT TITLE IV-LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION 50 40 C'.F.R. ~ Target Ho usin g and hild -occ upicd Facil ities: Did the 74 .227(c)(8)(vi) certified firm /reno ator elect the room . hallways or stairwells for sampling according to documented methodologies? Com men ts :1 40 C.F.R. Target Hou ing a nd C hild -occ upi ed Facil ities: Did the 74 -.227(c)(8)( ii certified inspector or risk assessor compare the residual lead ) level from dust sa mples with clearance levels to determine if level exceeds the app licab le clearance level? Comments -2 40 C.F.R. Ta rget Housi ng and Cb ild -occupied Facilities: Did a 74 - .227(e)(8)(vii certified inspector or risk assessor re-c lean and retest the ) su rface of components that were determined to have failed clearance testing after abatement? Comments 53 40 C.F.R. Target Housing an d Child-occupied Facilities: Did the 745 .227(e)(8)(vii certified fi rm/renovator use the sta nd ard clearance levels for i) lead in dust of 40 ftg/ft2 for floors , 250 g/ ft2 for interior window sills, and 400 g/ft2 for win dow trough s to determine ifa level in a samo le exceeds the aoolicab le clearance level? Comments 54 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child -occupied Faci liti es: Did a 745.227(e)(9) certified firm/ renovator perform random sampling in a multifamily dwelling with similarly constructed an d mai ntain ed residentia l dwellings according to the prescribed methods? Comments 55 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did a 745.227(e)( 10) certified renovator/supervi sor or project designer prepare an abatement report th at includes the reauired inform at ion? Comments 56 40 C.F.R. Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Did a 745.227(() certified renovator ensure that all paint chi p, dust, or soi l samples obtained are co ll ected by a certified ri sk assessor or oaint insoector and anal yzed bv an EPA recogni zed laboratory? Comm ents 57 40 .F.R. Target Housi ng and Child-occupied Facilities: Did th e 745 .227(g) certi fied renovato r limit compo ite dust sa mpling to on ! those situati ons speci ti ed? Co mm ents tJI~ tl \ i- t,) \I tl I\\ ~I(\ '3 \ \\ '1 \ ~ ~ \~ Pag 20 of 21 COMPANY NAME: ----~~ll~O~t__._F-=~'-'-t-"--1_____________ J 27 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 ft U.S. EPA Lead Renova tion/Repair/Painting Compliance hecklist - Renovators US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTCTION AGENCY REGION 6, OALIAS, TX 7S202 TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __J_ _ _ __..T:'....'..IT~L:=E...I'.V. -~LEAD HAZARD REDUCTION s 40 C.F.R. ~ 74 .2 27(h) Target Ilo using a nd C hihl -occ upicd Faci lities: Did lhC certified rcnov:itor make a detcnnmat1on on lhe presence of lcad-baseu paint? Comments 59 40 CFR Target !lousing a nd Ch ild -occupied Facilities: Is 1he firm 745 .233 certified performs, ofTcrs or claims to perform renovations or du t sampling for compensation to obtain initial certification from EPA. under40 C.F.R. 745.226? Comments tJ try tl \' # Re!! Ref l 40 C.F.R. 745 .227/d)(l) LEAD-BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENTS Ouestion Is the person perfonning a risk assessment certified by EPA as a risk assessor? Y-N-NIA ,.i I II. Comments 2 40 C.F.R. 745 .227(d)(2) Did a certified renovator conduct a visual inspection for risk .i r\\ assessment of a child-occupied facility to locate the existence of deteriorated paint, assess extent and causes of deterioration, and other notcntial lead based naint hazards? Comments Target Housing Maior = one or more occupants under age 6 and/or pregnant woman S1gnif1cant = no information about age of the youngest occupant, or one or more occupants between ages of 6 and 17 Minor= no occupant s under age 18 Child Occupied Facility Major= one or more occupants under age 6 (by definition, a child-occupied facility 15 regularly visited by one or more children under 6) Minor= renovation act1v1ttes were completed during a period when children did not access the facility (e.g., as summer vacation) and there 15no continuity of enrollment (1.e., the same children are not returning after the break). Page 21 of 21 COMPANY NAME . _ _ _ _ _...HL!...loL<..UOJ:.\.:......r!_-s.LJl.H.!___ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ 28 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Appendix 3 Maps of Communities 29 U.S. ARMY -r l 1s _ [FGo -------+ ""~Duro l lnf~ntr"f' Post Ouplt"v oll CGO - lnfan~~S..l'\flt'F.lm~ 1 21 '""... ___ ~ .;.__-1-_1_00_ _ f ..l!W 60 Staff "_-_ _ _ _ _ _ _+-15 FGO ,,.co- - - - i JNCO GO W.1tk1MtNTKe Whe-..ton/Gr-~ham Dtck:m.ln 2 ~ Jt.lCO ,-- ~ W ~ ~ m Dtdmain CGO. 20 CPT Onty WhHton/G.-.~n fGO I 107 FGO ~ m n (COL Onlyl 7 Art1l~ty POS1 Jg :::-~ I: 172 Hams~ hts 9 I ~-!" ~-,a1~ C.- ---, 1 -- Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Privatized Housing Provider: Hunt Military Communities 925 homes ,- 434 Historic ,- 491 Non-historic - Hi Infantry Post -- Staff Post Art!lleiy Post Wheaton/Graham/01ckman Hancock Gorgas Hams Heights Watkins Terrace Patch Chaffee/Marvin R Woods i ;ffii j 188611948 1881-86 1905-08 1931-34 1905-08 1934 2004 1995-96 1934/2006 30 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 (_ _ ARTILLARYPOST ADDRESS MAP JOM"a~SANA."ffll!NK) rou SAM MOUST0tf ICAl.l.1- Dollff" iNf- 31 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 DEPARTME).,- ,'JR FORCE WHEATON-ORAHAM ADDRESS MAP JOM L\ll SAN ANtQNlO fOI\TWIHOUSTOt,a ICAl.11,oQ D,,\lllA.'t- 32 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 .. ,,,. - - -- ...,,, urwmym;pnp;rnrm1m,;1w lf'P!CIMPD:11.,,.IBINC>JriOIA liM 9"f:':Q,IDNU'!lf:!I::- _GORGAS CTR ..... ADDRESS MAP JO.D..lf,a.ADSA."Nff'OJ,llD 33 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 / - .,,. - a1 I '::P:U"lr:811 l1JIP fQft Il1f CUI RIY91.HP II!'fUAOOAUl"M!lfSINCt:f9Iffl Fet9 QAUCIII?M,,.,C!I - HANCOCK ADDRESS MAP IOINT SASE SA."1 MiOh'lO fOUS.U.IIIOl.'STO.~ ICALl-1 .. "1'&AJ'- 34 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 _,,,.. ---- =---=---- DEPARTMENT- ,UJ. FORCE @' " 0 ' 0 'r",.i'2ii.b'imff" TM - ADDRESS MAP IOOo'Tt.ASllA.\f.orrotiJO tCAU'.11".1,'11""G',";l"'L"J'u"l"- ' 35 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 '...-' r-----L..__J- 0 11 XI d im-A!mv1osr ADDRESS MAP JO..l.>,,T...I..A.U..S,A._.'l~ ~ - a,,,n.:w..- 36 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 I,. r ... ~ , 03570 HO 110 * OU 000:ANTRY POST ADDRESS MAJ> JOl,,TIA!!SA."A.'i'T'O'OO ICM'.I"'-""n'",,","ri"w"t- 37 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Appendix 4 Photo log 38 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010001.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:10 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Debris in corner of work area with paint chips at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 39 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010002.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:11 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Baseboard prepared to paint at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 40 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010003.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:11 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Baseboard prepared to paint at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 41 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010004.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:11 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Sanding dust and paint chips on floor at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 42 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010005.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:13 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Debris from work at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 43 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010006.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:14 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Baseboards prepared for paint at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 44 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010007.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:15 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Baseboards prepared for paint at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 45 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010008.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:16 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Paint chips on ground at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 46 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010009.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:16 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Paint chips on ground at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 47 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010010.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:18 PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Painted baseboard at 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 48 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010011.JPG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:19PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Painted baseboard 2857 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 49 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010012PG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:30PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Debris from shower stall work at 2800 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 50 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010013PG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:30PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Debris from shower stall work at 2800 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 51 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Photo File Name: P1010014PG Date of Photo: 10/21/2024 Time of Photo: Approximately 12:33PM Photographer: Stan Lancaster Description: Contractor vehicle performing work at 2800 Chaffee Road San Antonio TX 78234 52 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Appendix 5 Receipt for Samples and Documents (Form 7740-1) 53 Hunt Military Community at Fort Sam Houston Inspection Date: 10/21/2024 Uni tt!d StatM 7 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY -~ - Wa shington, DC 20460 Receipt for Samples and Documents Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 1 lnvest19at1on ldent1f,cat1on 2 Company Name IDate I lnspec:t,on No IV/.21 L~~it 111 1v ;IJ - c.u1 3 Inspector Address I Daily Seq No. 11 01 forI .x""- /1,:;...u-fvn. - /1"1rd- Yl,/,ti:-r;u_J I to, n,n!1!li6",,_kt.. c.. 4 Company Address I/2<)/ Fl,1\ ~'f<zc:i ).? 31 l),c.t,,.,~ n-'"-IA C, '-/,J), Fut-+ 5.4""' /) 1:t/ ,. , Te;i c., , ; 5'1.?J 11 /-11A...,J WI' r~XC> I / i J..3'~/ For tntemal [PA us.. Cop,es of this fonn may be provided to rec,p,ent as ac~nowledgm.-nt of the documents and sampl.-s of ch.-rr>,cal svb,tances and/or mnctures descnbed below collected In connect,on with the administrauon and enforcement of the Toxic Subst,mces Control Act Receipt of Document(s) and/or Sample(s) Described Is Hereby Acknowledged No I I ,I. 3 Descnpt1on filufujl~ Ljrh.;,t,,, II ~I I H~, ~\l11T"7 l...,y)t1'<-1111.hl, t-'r;vc,t.~.t Hu..,,..) vty ( '-I l.v(J,c,. ) I J Ir,0;v1-<.wtl "-..,,n.....,1, #z)w,~ tl"\-'r'' fur prt- l'JJt tu.ntrMt11J~, (7,vv,_u I I' I I I' I I I II II' . Opuonal Duplicate or Split Samples Requested and Provided Not Requested ,..:.... lnspector:~s__/ S1gna,tu,c! N~ vf'-./e.4. M,,... "~--zcz.,5-;lz, Tnle [ ;!, , ~ , I-. r II Date IJo/~~ f Claimant'~ , ~ Signature ~l,(.,C. ) IName lri1Y1rJ1,\I/\ ,L, ' \~\rt?n\iv IT,tle I\{\~\(v C:o.1 ~C\ ii Date I\0 1~1 ]~ PA rorm 71401 IRMI } / 161 1-lntP<-"<IOf Copy 54