Document da2Oz5xEBx0keLe8JrJpMmgwe

JOHN L THORNOAL LELAND EUGENE BACKUS A W ILLIA M M A U P IN JAMES G ARMSTRONG C R A IG R D E LK PEGGY A LEEN PA U L F EISIN G ER NANCY M SOMERS BR IAN K TERRY B AR BAR A M Q ilA C O N I G IN G E R R JA M E S DEBO R AH A S A N V ILLE LAW O FFICES THORNDAL, BACKUS, MAUPIN & ARMSTRONG A PRO FESSIO N AL C O RPO RATIO N POST O FFICE DRAWER 2 0 7 0 1 lO O EAST BRIDGER AVENUE LAS VEGAS. NEVADA 8 9 12 5 -2 0 7 0 (7 0 2 )3 6 6 0 6 2 2 FAX (7 02 ) 3 6 6 -0 3 2 7 December 19, 1989 RENO O FFICE STEPHEN C SALKENBUSH CHARLESL BURCHAM JEFFR EY D M O R R ISO N FEDERAL EXPRESS Thomas E. Kotoske, Esq. 540 University Avenue Third Floor Palo Alto, CA 94301 Re: Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Dear Mr. Kotoske: In accordance with our telephone conferences of December 8 and December 12, attached please find genuine photocopies of your document nos. 203-208, 209-211, 212, and 249 as maintained in Monsanto's files. They are marked in the lower right corner as documents NEV 000001 - NEV 000011. These documents were the type that Monsanto would keep and maintain in the regular course of its business activities and it was Monsanto's regular practice to keep and maintain the documents. I believe the above and the attached meets with the requirements and agreement that we reached in our telephone conversations and that you have no further dispute with Monsanto's discovery responses. JLT/ad Enc. c c :w / enc. RECEIVED J J C & B lDATE