Document dY04ympeJ0jGjx2aORrjy27vQ
FILE NAME Newspaper & Magazine Articles NMA
DATE 1954 June 10
DOC NMA102
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION NYT - Tobacco Industry Acts to Determine Whether Cigarettes and Lung Cancer Are Related
SCIENCE IN By ROBERT K. New York Times Pg E9
REVIEW PLUMB
Current
file Jan 10
1954 ProQuest Historical Newspapers The New York Times 1851
- 200
SCIENCE IN REVIEW
z
Tobacco Industry Acts to Determine Whethe
Cigarettes and Lung Cancer Are Related
By ROBERT K. PLUMB
|
Leaders
of
the
tobacco
industry
this week announced
|
cigarette
companies
a
Tobacco
Industry
that the major
established had
Research
Com-
| mittee to study all phases of tobacco
use
and
health
The
formation
of
; the committee was prompted by new
medical
evidence
that
there
may
be
a connection
over
a
long
between heavy
period
and
the
smoking develop-
| ment of lung cancer
|
Two sets of statistics puzzle public
health
men
One
set
shows
that
the
consumption
of
cigarettes
increased
fourfold in the twenty years between
1933 and 1953.
The other shows that
the
annual
number
of
deaths
from
lung cancer has likewise increased-
from 3,400 in 1933 to 22,000 in 1953
Is there any connection
The
parallel
between
lung
cancer
and
increased
cigarette
smoking
proves nothing in itself Tuberculosis
deaths
for
instance
have
dropped
just as fast as cigarette smoking has
risen
So one could argue that smok-
ing
prevents
tuberculosis
Other
parallels
could
be
drawn
in
a
simi-
larly
rough
fashion
and
they would
prove nothing
The accumulated evi-
dence
now
available
is
not
so
crude
however
Smokers Classified
First
consider
smoking
Exact
figures on who smokes what and how
often are lacking
Studies have been
made but most are marketing studies
made for advertising an elaborate analysis
purposes
For
of the problem
the American Cancer Society has set up four arbitrary definitions of ciga-
rette smoking Light smokers
rate
These
are
smoke
less
than
1 half
pack day
2
Moderate smokers
smoke Heavy
a
pack
smokers
or
less
between
a
day
one and
3
two
packs a day 4 Very heavy smokers
consume more It should be
than two packs a day pointed out that these
classifications are not rigorous That
is
a
light
smoker
who
used
less
than
half
a
pack
a
day
for
many
years might for statistical
become
a
heavier
smoker
purposes
A
two-
pack
man
who
has
just
started
smoking smoker
is
still
classed
as
a
light
How do these figures compare with
actual
cigarette
consumption
No
one knows exactly how many smokers
there are and how often they smoke But the cancer society has found that
fourths
of
all
contemporary
males between 50 and 69 are or have
been regular smokers
light to very
heavy 18 per
classification
and
that
only
cent
have
never
smoked
cept
for
a
few
behind the barn
experimental
puffs
In 1953
the population
of
the
na-
tion was about 160,000,000 men wo-
men
and children
That year about
420,000,000,000
cigarettes
were
sold
Estimates of the number of smokers
range upward from 50,000,000
If
it
is assumed that half the total popu-
lation
smokes
then about
three-
fourths
of
a pack
a
day
were
used
by
each
smokers
of in
the the
80,000,000 presumed
nation
The
estimate
of
80,000,000
smokers
seems
high
however it appears more likely that
the
average
consumption
is
more
than fourths of one pack a day
For
comparison
100,000,000,000
cigarettes were smoked in 1933. Then
the population was
If half
these
men
about 125,000,000
women
and
chil-
dren were smokers the average con-
Isumption was only about
fourth
a pack a day
Certainly the number
of
smokers
has
increased
in
twenty
years
Probably
the
average
daily
consumption
per
smoker
has
risen
also
An American Study
The traces
American
Cancer
Society
back into the scientific litera-
ture to 1923 for the first studies link-
ing tobacco and cancer
Early studies
were
by
German
Japanese
Scandi-
navian and French investigators
All
sought for a possible inhalant factor
in
lung
cancer
atmospheric
gases
dust metallic powders other factors
were considered
The
carbon
monox-
ide
nicotine
and
tars
of
tobacco
smoke were separated out and tested
for their causing abilities
In
1928
an
American
study
was
published in the Journal of the Amer-
ican Medical Association 91 150-151
July
21
1928
Tars
from
pipe
to-
bacco
failed
to
produce
cancer
in
mice this report said Meanwhile German
experimenters
reported they had eliminated nicotine
and
carbon
monoxide
as
cancer
causes The
German
possible research-
ers
added
that
tobacco
tars
had
a
mild causing ability and that
it
could
be
effective
only
in
an
in-
dividual with a special disposition to-
ward cancer
the
Germans
Shortly before the
believed
they had
lated
the
cancer
cause
among
war
iso-
the
combustion products of tobacco
The
substance they
named
benzpyrene
has
not subsequently
been
tobacco smoke by American
found
in
research-
ers
Many Causes
After
World
War
death
rate
from
lung
to
alert public
health
II
when
the
cancer
began
authorities
to
a
new
health
hazard
studies
the
world over established that many sub-
stances
can
cause
cancer in humans
Among
them
are
emanations
from
violet radioactive
light mate
rials
compounds
of
arsenic
chro-
mium
nickel
and
beryllium
also
asbestos
tar
pitch
crude
oils
and
greases
from
petroleum
and
benzol
derivitives
In some instances other
factors are important
Among these
are
diet
medicinal
materials
cos-
metics habits
customs
climate
and
various
contaminants
of
air
water
soil and foodstuffs
So far studies on lung cancer and
cigarettes have linked the two by a
means not approved by most statisti-
cians
It
was
however
the
only
method available
That is cases of
lung cancer have been reviewed The
smoking habits of these victims have
been
compared
with
the
smoking
habits of healthy individuals
These
studies do suggest that smoking ciga
rettes
and
lung
cancer
are
related
Further other tests establish that a
material
unknown
from
cigarette
smoke
will
cause
cancer
in
animals
used
in
experiments
For alone rettes
some researchers this evidence
is
enough
to
condemn
ciga-
For others
the
present evi-
dence is not enough
There seems to
be a division among
entists
Some
hold
independent sci-
that
it
is
essen-
tial to alert the public to the dangers
even
though
they
are
not
proved
others believe their duty is to answer
yes or no to the big question be-
fore they frighten smokers by warn-
ing of possibilities
The American Cancer Society may
be able to provide a conclusive yes
or
no
answer
in
about
eighteen
months
Two years ago this spring
the society used 22,000 of its volun-
teer workers to get the health records
of
204,000
white
males
between
the
ages jects
of 50 and 69. This group of sub-
will die
at
the
rate
of
thirteen
each
day
according to
the
actuarial
tables At certificate
the time of death a death
is
obtained
to
reveal
the
cause
in
each
instance
Some
of
the
men will die of lung cancer most will
not
From the study
the society ex-
pects
to
find
out
whether
cigarette
smoking
causes
lung
cancer
If
it
does
the
amount
of
smoking
light
to very heavy and the length of time
which
this
rate
of
will also be known
smoking
involved
"
Lengthy Study
Other industries
have been
study-
ing
for
many
years
the
possibility
that cancer may sometimes be caused
by
common
industrial
products
or
processes
The
petroleum industry
the chemical industry and some of the
metals
industries
are
examples
It
is
fair
to
ask why
it
has
taken
the
cigarette industry so long to initiate
its
own
research
Scientific
reports
linking lung cancer and smoking par-
ticularly cigarette smoking have ap-
peared
in
the
journals
for
thirty
years and
'
years
in
the public
press for
ten
The evidence linking smoking and
cancer is not conclusive
Many scien-
tists hold on the contrary that there
is
no
connection
between
the
two
In public health however it is com-
mon sense to assume that a suspected
health
menace
is
guilty
until
it
is
proved
innocent
whatever
may
be
the practice in other fields
It is unfortunate that the establish-
ment of the industry committes has called attention of those who smoke
to the scientific discussion now when
no
conclusive
information
can
be
given
Research
on
human
subjects
takes
a
long
time
cancer
may
de-
velop slowly
Smokers want to know
the
hazards if
any
in
their habit
and
no
one
can
give
a
decision now
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner
Further reproduction prohibited without permission