Document dRMbYNnXXEm2EQ89Kqw5oRG5

FILE NAME Owens Illinois OWILL DATE 1985 Dec 6 DOC OWILL080 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Legal - Continued Testimony of Gerrit W. Scheppers M.D. COST $ PAID BY PLF DEF TBA No IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION WILLIAM J. KORNEGAY S sssss VS. sssss sssss MANVILLE SALES sssss CORPORATION ET AL S CIVIL ACTION NO 81-131 CONSOLIDATED ) BEFORE PROCEEDINGS THE HONORABLE HUGH GIBSON f / DECEMBER 6 1985 VOLUME VI CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION OF GERRIT W. H. SCHEPERS M.D. * EXHIBIT TENDER COURTEO COCUROTEUORCTOEUROTECOCOOUURTREOTOERTOERS 1560 W. Bay Area Boulevard Suite 280 Houston Texas 77546 280-0015 APPEARANCES Messrs Robert E. Ballard of the law firm of Messrs Abraham Watkins Nichols Ballard Onstad & Friend 800 Commerce Street Houston Texas 77002 and Lawrence Madeksho of the Law Offices of Lawrence Madeksho 8320 Gulf Freeway Houston Texas 77087 representing the 10 Plaintiffs 11 12 13 Ms. Elizabeth Thompson and Mr. Robert D. 14 Arredondo of the law firm of Messrs Butler & Binion 1600 15 Allied Bank Plaza Houston Texas 77002 representing 16 Defendant Raymark 17 mera 18 19 Messrs Arthur Stamm John A. Sullivan and 20 Walter E. Workman of the law firm of Messrs Baker & 21 Botts One Shell Plaza Houston Texas 77002 representing 22 Defendant Illinois and the Wellington Group 23 24 25 WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 3 Messrs Samuel E. Stubbs of the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski Eighth Floor MBank Building Houston Texas 77002 and James H. Crosby of the law firm of Messrs Brown Hudgens & Richardson 1495 University Blvd. Mobile Alabama 36609 representing Defendant Corning Fiberglas 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Messrs Walter F. Conrad and F. Witcher McCullough of the law firm of Messrs Baker & Botts One Shell Plaza Houston Texas 77002 representing Defendant GAF Ms. Sandra F. Clark of the law firm of Messrs Mehaffy Weber Keith & Gonsoulin InterFirst Tower Beaumont Texas 77704 representing Defendant Standard Ms. Gail C. Jenkins of the law firm of Messrs Benckenstein Norvell Bernsen & Nathan Sixth Floor InterFirst Tower P. O. Box 551 Beaumont Texas 77704 representing Defendant Celotex WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC Mr. R. Lyn Stevens of the law firm of Messrs Weller Wheelus & Green Fifth Floor Petroleum Building P. O. Box 350 Beaumont Texas 77704 representing Defendant Fibreboard Mr. John H. Boswell of the law firm of Messrs Boswell & Hallmark 2100 InterFirst Plaza Houston Texas 77002 representing Defendant Armstrong 10 11 12 Mr. Ronald E. Cook of the law firm of 13 Messrs Mayor Day & Caldwel 70l0 Milam Houston Texas 14 77002 representing Pittsburgh 15 16 17 Mr. Frank M. Bean of the law firm of Messrs 18 Bean & Manning 1611 Weslayan Tower 24 Greenway Plaza 19 Houston Texas 77046 representing Defendant Picher 20 21 22 23 24 25 j WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 77 experiments and check what had been accomplished and to develop a report suitable for publication on the biological action of the material which is what I then did Q. Okay Now to educate us a little bit the Kaylo contained 15 to 20 percent asbestos did it not A. The Kaylo itself is the trade name applyintgo different kinds of products with different compositions sometimes with 15 percent chrysotile sometimes with chrysotile mixed with amosite and sometimes with different 10 quantities of these The product we studied at the Saranac 11 Laboratory for the term inhalation study it was 12 shorter finding tests but the long study was 13 continued several years was Kaylo with 15 percent 14 chrysotile in it _ 15 Q. Now was the conclusion of Saranac that the dust from 16 Kaylo exposed users to a hazard 17 A. Yes sir 18 Q. In publishing this report did you say that Kaylo could 19 cause cancer 20 A. No. I described changes of the kind that we put on the 21 board there the epithelialization and the deformation of 22 the lung structure around the bronchioles which I called 23 an adenomatoid change which is a way of saying it looks 24 like a tumor That's as far as I was willing to go 25 because the cells have not metastasized to another location WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 78 and I used the metastasizing or the spreading from one point to another as the criterion for saying this is a cancer versus this is a tumor growth Q. As of the time of the completion of the experiments the cancer had not yet appeared as scientifically defined A. Yes Q. If when you were writing up the report you had been asked the opinion Do you have an opinion based upon reasonable medical probability as to whether or not these 10 changes will become cancerous in the future after a few 11 more years what would have been your opinion 12 A. That they are a precursor to cancer in other words 13 that they would lead to cancer eet 14 Q. Could you describe for the Court and jury the nature 15 of the experiments that were conducted on these animals 16 you might tell us what type animals they were and how the 17 experiment was conducted and why it was conducted 18 A. Yes It was a typical Saranac Laboratory study spread 19 over three -- slightly more than three years during which 20 animals of three species were kept in cages into which 21 quantities of Kaylo dust were caused to flow by mechanical 22 agitating machinery And the animals lived under those 23 circumstances for the same periods of time as might have 24 been the experience of a human being working in a factory 25 that was how the factory was designed In other words WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 79. approximately eight hours a day five days a week and then a rest period and then the same the next day or the next week And that was continued for three or four years almost four years The animals were sampled which is a euphemism for saying that numbers of them were taken and killed and studied And so as time went by there were fewer and fewer animals left And towards the end I think there were about nine or so animals that ran the full course of exposure and showed the maximum effects of the inhaled dust Q. All right A. There was another phase of the study -- Q. Doctor could I break your train of thought there A. Yes Q. It has been represented to this Court and jury that about 450 animals were subjected to the tests and only 9 showed evidence of fibrosis I think you just covered that Could you explain that to us A. I'll have to look at my report to be sure of the numbers but that is a positive test the way the tests are done First of all a whole lot of animals died at the start which suggested either that there was an epidemic amongst the animals or that the dust was too toxic for them to live in So that reduced the numbers And then from there on the survivors which meant the toughest animals WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC . 80 were sampled progressively Q. Excuse me By sampled you mean you would kill them A. Killed and tissues cut up into sections and put on microscopes and chemical analysis made of the tissues to see how much dust was in the lung Q. Okay A. Of course with the last sampling that had to be the least number because those are the only ones that were left were nine The test of asbestosis is not just 10 whether or not fibrosis occurs Fibrosis is just one of 11 the manifestations of what asbestos dust does The animals 12 developed this emphysema that we talked about they 13 developed this adenomatoid change 14 Q. Precancerous 15 A. Yes the precancerous changes And they developed the 16 fibrosis in those that lived long enough Remember this 17 is only a few years and it normally takes many years for 18 asbestosis to develop It doesn't occur immediately The 19 fibrous component of it Also the dust exposure in this 20 particular experiment was relatively low It was 21 approximately a quarter to a sixth of the usual method in 22 which asbestos experiments were conducted in the Saranac 23 Laboratory 24 Q. I need to stop you there Doctor because two thoughts ( ||i \ 25 come to my mind and I need to get it out before I forget WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 81 them A. Yes Q. Of the nine animals that were left were they killed or sacrificed and examined A. Yes Q. Of the nine that remained how many had what you would call asbestosis in animals A. All of them 100 percent Q. 100 percent A. Yes Q. Now I'm coming back to where you left off These Kaylo experiments began I believe in 1943 did they not A. Yes Right Q. At Saranac A. Yes Q. Now before 1943 Saranac had been performing asbestos experiments for members of the asbestos industry for some number of years had it not A. Since 1930 yes sir Q. Now would some of the early experiments have been with what would be classified pure asbestos A. Yes Q. The Kaylo experiments would be conducted with containing dust A. Yes sir WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC a els eo = ar 82 Q. That was not pure asbestos A. It was diluted the asbestos was diluted by the of the hydrous calcium silicate component of the presence product Q. Okay Now was there a difference in the dust exposure in the Kaylo tests compared to what had been done before that time A. Yes sir Dr. Gardner in his 18 large experiments had determined over the period preceding that the 12 years preceding that one could evoke in the typical experimental 11 animals such as the guinea pig asbestosis in the form of if 12 fibrosis you expose that animal for three to four years 13 in a dust environment ranging from 700 to 900 million 14 particles per cubic foot of air And that produced the 15 standard direction which was our measure with which to 16 calibrate the effects of the new dust and that was the 17 laboratory biological measure 18 Q. All right 19 A. For the Kaylo experiments the dust levels were set at 20 a lower dose 21 Q. A lower dose 22 A. Yes About a sixth of the dose that was going or being 23 used in the other asbestos experiments 24 Q. Now I want to be sure I understand this If we took 25 the prior asbestos experiments would they be with pure WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 83 asbestos or mixed dust A. With pure asbestos Q. Okay If you took the hundred -- A. Whatever pure asbestos is but it's the asbestos as it comes from the factory Q. I believe that's chrysotile with the amphiboles shaken out of it If you took the pure asbestos then allegedly pure test it at higher levels seven or 800 million and with 10 the Kaylo which was a mixed dust only containing 20 11 percent asbestos at what level was it tested 12 A. About 120 to -- there were two experiments One was 13 about 120 to 60 I believe And the other was about 200 a 14 little over 200 15 Q. So to make a comparison between the asbestos fiber 16 exposure would we then have to take 20 percent of the 120 -- 17 let's take the 200 because I can figure that one a lot 18 quicker Twenty percent of that would be 19 A. Forty 20 Q. Thank you 40,000 as composed to 700 to 800,000 in the 21 three tests 22 A. Yes 23 Q. Okay And it would determine that even at this low 24 exposure that could cause asbestosis 25 A. Yes sir WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 84 Q. There was a letter from Illinois to Dr. Gardner proposing these tests and outlining them in about 1943 MR BALLARD I'll have them after lunch Your Honor THE COURT Yes sir Q. By Mr. Ballard But if I may paraphrase it when Dr. Gardner wrote back to Illinois he said You're starting out with a class hazard A. Yes sir 10 Q. All right Bearing in mind Dr. Hueper's 1943 statement 11 connecting asbestos and cancer would you agree with Dr. 12 Gardner that including 15 to 20 percent asbestos in this 13 product would indicate that you're starting out with a 14 class hazard 15 A. The emphasis is not where your question puts it The 16 emphasis is that Dr. Gardner the product as described to 17 Dr. Gardner in the '43 correspondence and the results of 18 preliminary analyses indicated that the product contained 19 both asbestos and hydrous calcium silicate and some 20 unmodified quartz particles in other words silicon 21 dioxide 22 And my understanding of what Dr. Gardner meant by 23 that statement was that if you combine silica exposure with 24 asbestos exposure you are creating a class hazard 25 because the laboratory had done many studies on human WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC 85 beings who had worked in factories where they were exposed both to silica and asbestos and they were killed in five to ten years time showing that it was an extremely extremely hazardous combination of the two harmful substances I think that was what Dr. Gardner was focusing on and I believe that's why the dust levels were adjusted downwards to reduce the role of the silica in the test THE COURT This would be a good time to recess for lunch And please be back at 1:15 again 10 11 Whereupon after the luncheon recess the proceedings 12 continued within the presence and hearing of the jury as 13 follows 14 15 THE COURT Be seated 16 MR BALLARD May I proceed 17 THE COURT Please 18 Q. By Mr. Ballard Dr. Schepers we were talking about 19 I believe the relationship between Saranac Laboratory 20 Illinois and the product Kaylo which contained 21 asbestos Did you know a Dr. Shook Charles Shook and a 22 Mr. Willis Hazard 23 A. Yes sir 24 Q. Could you relate to the Court and jury what Dr. Shook's 25 position was and who he worked for WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTERS INC