Document dQ7vzEkKZbRoJG1w69QrLwGY0
Chemical Manufacturers Association Record of Meeting
VINYL'CHLORIDE PROJECT PANEL
AND RESEARCH COORDINATORS March 4, 1980
CMA Offices, Room 404
Washington, D. c
MEMBERS PRESENT;
R. A. Park
B. Braddle (for F. Kennedy)
R. J. Abramowitz
J . F . Gabbett
P. Cohen
W. d. Harris
M. Sannerhoff (for J. Stauffer)
C . A . Johnson
C. P. Wen (for R. Gibson)
C. Hopper
Z. Bell
R. M. Reed
V. L. Kirkland
~
R. N. Wheeler
W. Blakeslee
T. R. Torkelson
J. T. Seawell
Firestone Plastics Co. Continental Oil Co. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Georgia-Pacific Corp. Great American chemical Corp. UNIROYAL Stauffer Chemical Co. Goodyear Gulf Oil Chemicals Co. Gulf Oil Chemicals Co. PPG Industries, Inc. Tenneco Chemicals, Inc. Shell Chemical Co. Union Carbide Certain-Teed Products Dow chemical Co.
CMA Staff
MEMBERS ABSENT;
W. M. Smith J. T. Carter W. A. Bittenbender R. W. McBurney T. J. Benya J. Lynch R. W. Laundrie M. N. Johnson R. B. Judge
Air Products & Chemicals, BP Chemicals, Ltd. Borden Chemical Diamond Shamrock Ethyl Corporation Exxon Corporation General Tire & Rubber Co. BFGoodrich Co. w. R. Grace & Co.
Inc.
CMA 015844
-.'iiiiii.niiiiffliilfcWlfcSl
A G * XrissLs-- 5 X * Law
?.cush 1. C'Connell
-recmman
_0
2 Cl Americas, Inc. K ey s c r -C an our'/ Coro. Men same Co many Clin Ccrocraticn
t t
-w^327r*',,*i3* ^ * ^9CC ZT" /"`*= '"aS'z '!ss*inc
Che record of the lieveriar 23 , 1379 meeting was approved
a-- 7-a/^i-s--
2.0 P.eevaluats the Toxicio' -.`.-Orica, Poivvinvj. Chloride,and Structural
Che Chairman reviewed the CMA/SPI joint contributions to the conference made in response to requests from Er. Infanta's office.
3.0 Preparatory Work for the Five-Year Update of the Zpidsir.ioiocical Study Completed by Equitable Environmental Health, Ino. (ZZH)
Consideration of this agenda item began with a review cf specifications prepared by the Project Administrator in order to clarify the proposal submitted by Environmental Health Associates, Inc (EHA) on January 15, 1980. A schematic prepared for the CMA presentation showed the sequence in which the interrelated investigation could progress and presented a flow diagram of the overall study. EHA will proceed immediately with an assessment and evalua tion of the EEH data preparatory to beginning work on the brain study and the design of a protocol for the five-year update. The Chairman emphasized that, once developed, the protocol becomes CMA property and will form the basis of bid/proposal requests.
As originally envisioned by EHA, their approach to the data assessment, brain study, and five-year update is comprised of five investigations. Some of these are prerequisites for studies that would follow and all are interdependent.
CMA 015845
rt n
Action of the Panel and the Research Coordinators cn the Proposal and the EHA letter of January 15, 1980 included following:
3.1 Paragraph 3 on page 4 of the CMA proposal will be changed to read as follows:
At CMA's option, EHA will contact the deceased' s fam.ilv for additional details. This will be decided cn a case-bv-case basis and consul-ration with the company involved.
3.2 The Panel members were in agreement with Items 1 through 3 on the proposed ballot.
3.3 It was VCTED that:
EHA will be requested to prepare, a protocol and a cost estimate for a "case concrol soudy" of cancers of che central nervous system.
3.4 The ballot that `formed an integral part of the CMA proposal is to be changed to reflect Item 3.3 above.
3.5 It was VOTED:
We recommend asking potential sponsors if they are interested in financially sponsoring a thorough case control study including clinical evaluation of brain tumor cases.
3.6 EHA will prepare a protocol for the "brain case control study". This study will be open for bids in addition to the EKA bid.
3.7 It was VOTED:
That action should proceed on Item 4.3. of the ballot_ as this Item is recorded. This Item concerns interest in sponsor ing Study Plan A.
3.8 Regarding Ballot Item 4.4, Study Plan B should'be modified by identifying the plants as follows:
Group I - Vinyl Chloride Monomer Group II - pvc by Dispersion or Emulsion Processes Group III - All others
CMA 015846
I" was VOTED to r.c_c Iren 4.4 (Study Plan B) ir. abevar.ce for consideration az a future dare.
Page 5, paragraph 2, of zhe January, 1978 final
report prepared by EEH ar.oitlad "Epidam.iclogical
-- T ' * *" ' * *
--
'-** -
*/-> ~ >-* 3 *f
~ - - -- - ' ^ `x ---------------
' -O. 3 a -4 ^ ^ r- ^
- -- -- - "* --
c
-
zo "hcmocci^TT.srs, c clymers, cr resins,
with or without VCM and PVC p
--G 4 - .
^ r*i "
Ti'l*c*iiS^
reference is to he brought to .he attention of organizations concerned with .ture epiderr.iolcgical studies.
3.12
ZKA has apt of Study ?1
tanel.
ntly "grossly underestimated" the cost B in the opinion of the members of the
3.13
The panel members expressed the opinion that there is little likelihood that Study Plan C will contribute anything new. It is estimated that Study Plan C will not yield meaningful data until 10, 20, or perhaps 25 years hence.
3.14 It was VOTED to:
Table indefinitely Item 4.5 (Study Plan C) of the proposed ballot.
3.15 It was VOTED to:
Request EHA's "opinion and position" on analyzing data in terms of those plants producing (1) VCM, (2) emulsion or dis persion polymers (excluding latex), and (3) all others.- This analysis is to treat " significant differences with re spect to mortality at a cost not to exceed 310,000."
JTS:md
Accord Subject to Approval March 27, 1980
<:^J. T. Seawell Project Administrator Vinyl chloride
CMA 015847
ri n
p) *tJ
Action of the Panel and the Research Coordinators on the roDOsal and the EHA letter of January 15, 1930 included ollowing:
3.1 Paragraph 3 on page 4 of the CMA proposal will be changed to read as follows:
At CMA's option, EHA will contact the deceased's far.ilv for additional details. This will be decided or. a case-by-case basis and consultation with the company involved.
3.2 The Panel rerbers were in agreement with Items 1 through 3 on the proposed ballot.
3.3 It was VOTED that:
EHA will be requested to prepare a protocol and a cost estimate for a "case control study" of cancers of the central nervous system.
3.4 The ballet that `formed an integral part of the CMA proposal is to be changed to reflect Item 3 . 3 above.
3.5 It was VOTED:
We recommend asking potential sponsors if they are interested in financially sponsoring a thorough case control study inducing clinical evaluation of brain tumor cases.
3.6 EHA will prepare a protocol for the "brain case control study". This study will be open far bids in addition to the EHA bid.
3.7 It was VOTED:
That action should proceed on Item 4.3 of the ballot_ as this Item is recorded. This Item concerns interest in sponsor ing Study Plan A.
3.3 Regarding Ballot Item 4.4, Study Plan B should be modified by identifying the plants as follows:
Group I - Vinyl Chloride Monomer Group II - pvc by Dispersion or Emulsion Processes Group III - All others
CMA 015848