Document dOeDLoMm3nRDwQo48ZnDEDwG
AR226-2596
OEPA/DuPont
Off-site Water Sampling Re
October 22. 2002
Water Sampling Topics For
Today
^Ohio 2-Mile Radius Sampling Result
^Groundwater Modeling Update
^Little Hocking W.A. Investigation Re
Groundwater Results/Soil Analysis Stat
^Public Water System Sampling Upda ^Status of Water Sampling Work Und
WVDEP Consent Order
Ohio 2-Mile Residential
Sampling Results
ASH019870 EID630302
Ohio 0-2 Mile Water Sampl
Scope Summary
^Over 1200 homes surveyed/interview ^Over 130 residential drinking water
groundwater samples collected
ASH019872 EID630304
ASH019873 EID630305
^ySX^i^
'is^r
'--^'
O^w 2-Mile Sampling
^Observations:
All results significantly below 150 ug/L scr level for drinking water
Definite trend toward lower concentrations to 2 mile radius sampling area (vs 0 to 1 mi
Highest drinking water result:
6.5 ug.L (BoardJG, close to 1 mile boun
M
H
0
0
tri
S0 n
W1 a
Highest drinking water result near 2-mile boundary: 2.59 ug/L (KnottsC, west of Little Hocki
1.81 ug/L (SmithDD, north ofPorterfiel
/^
-s^<>"
Groundwater Modeling
^Project Objectives: Evaluate if a groundwater flow pathwa
between DuPont site and Little Hocking Field under current flow/pumping cond Evaluate other possible flow/pumping
conditions
Pumping Rates, February
2002 (gpm)
Site
DuPont (exc. Gallery)
GE
Little Hocking Lubeck Belpre
Total
68 21 4 4
7
ASH019878 EID630310
No DuPont Pumpin
'\..------. it
.-_n
i
l
;
i \\
.-..../
W
00 ;
'
^ <o '
''^w/
Little Hocking Water Association Well Field
Investigation
v-^:-3:-s:^^:/-.^ \Wi^-
LHWA Investigation
^Objectives:
Determine reason for elevated 08
concentrations in TW-4 Understand general distribution of C-8
and groundwater
'^iis^'
---------" ' "^ . .. ----^
T
.------"' '""' 1
, WELL (fl
TV- iO
^
IV S
-^
Tw-5.
^WEC-L^5
TU-3
^
^WELL fl.
^W-ll
^^---'"^"
LHWAffW--1
Al.MBANE-1X .........
'
'
LHWW-)
y
WA-3
'- X UWANE-Z
/< ' IV-t
^'-"
'*' x
y
UWASW-1
"^1E-1
''
/ / / LHMW-1
v
Lra'w* s-i
---- ----' "^
;< UHWHS-?
. ^WEU. S3
1
I
iv-i
^
--------^
\ -- '~^~\
EASEMENT----\
^
B u
-
----
^p OF ^-...-""^
^
-----
LEGEVD-
WATER SUPPIY WFIL
^ TEST WELL-
A BORING - SOIL S GROUNDWATER SAMPtES
V BORtNG - GROUNDWATCR
"
SAMPLES
SCALE
200
0
Q^O ^W^
NOTE: LCCATONS OF WEL-S AND BOR NGS ARE APPROXIMATE.
200"
i------------------
Corporate Rcinediatlon
Ji AilWM teriMm Suyvst mvS. UltS JHw--nd
^
Group
iSwtcy unn PiBTd, Guildin 37 Wrnbigton, Delaware iaSO&
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
UlUB Hocking WoUr Aacio< tiafe Hocking, Ohio
Jbi ^
.nSSW
4-D
DO.
3MU
1
X
,,WEXL ft
(1.72-3-6(5)
v-1.0 d.1-.9
<0
OF 8A.Nt<..
LEGEND:
WATER SUPPtY WEi-L
TST WELL
BORING - SOIL & GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
BORING SAMPLES
GROUNOWATER
0^ R^
NOTE: LOCATIONS OF WELLS ARE APPROXIMATE.
NO <0.01 ug/L
A\0
eORtNRS
200
Corporate Reniedtatton
Am MWanuaf b4R(fWr
OuPant ofut ifS IKmwuC
- Group
BorKy U;[i PIOTO. B^lcfi^B 37 WW-lrireylo", Dcn*f TBaOS ________
iKOUNCWATCal C--B CONCeNTflWO
Uttl l-oeking . Water Asso Uttio Moc<1n9, Ohio
Wafer Data Summary (in ug/
^ Production Well C-8 Concentrations:
Well 1 (1.7-3.6) Well 2 (2.0-4.3)
Well 3 (.42-.9 Well 5 (5.7-8
^ Test Wells:
TW-1 (.8-2.2)
TW-4 (12.3-3
TW-9 (.1-.3)
TW-10 (1.1-1
^ Probe Investigation:
Shallow GW
ND, 6.2,34.6, 50.8, 78
Midaq.GW Deepaq.GW
1.32
.166 (next to TW-4)
Preliminary Observations
^No results higher than 150 ug/L screening
^ Production-finished water consistently aro
ug/L ^ Higher C-8 concentrations in shallow grou
where fme grained aquifer matrix (IJe., cla
present
w Steep downward trend in aquifer C-8 concentrations with depth
^ Higher concentrations observed in TW-4
anomalous compared to overall data set
Bieoesaia saeeTOHsv
x >^
M
B1f1l in
1
^uii);ip<" n
t^I>fUa0DoOM-OO6) "-nj
f,
3 >
rm a
C5 ^ "
g, p^
^t. 11^- ^^
|1 |sCi ! r
1
n\^-, ' 0"
B3
S
\ *
1 '.
' :
\ \ N
.
.
''
\
\ I
\
'
\
\
'
\
i
\
1^
s-
XJg
u
;
.
S
^i^
s
1
^ .
sS
^,' p
e
\ -\-.
\" \
\
\ \ \ \ '.
\ '
\.\
\ .
\\:- \ , ..
\ '
...
\
i'.,
i
s
\
'
"
!
M"8.
^i g ----^L^x1 a,
S>Bi-Qin"
r-.Q
^\ J/'LlA,/'-- tj
02"
1 \ 1 T 11[Ij1
so
y -n
T/vx r 1 11 i^n
il E't VI
n ^^ !< 0 \%'-.A-^
% V-
is0
""'
-
t
i
s"
C\" X T f" i T "i
^
'z'
1
3/C'r- ^
i^' -- '?--'"
-*-'''^
\-1
^J
\ .
\
i
^^ ^ M
\^ s
s
\
\1 X /
/
/' '";"
\
'^ y ^ ^^
i I
\
\
V--1
i
i
'?
^
i
'
!-
7
!'-ii---------- r i
3
n 1/1
Is -s I- ^ ^
< s
a
\
\ ^\
^''^ i
^? |+? ^a
^ < b
S'g
? j "
z5 Ss
t
' d
p P ^ "3 0z
^ \ ,
:.
-
\
j J
! on
^
I "
!' 1
',
,
\ '
% '-s<-
^''k
ASH019BB7 EID630319
^ A
SCKCEKBO ttdfW/A. Of TEST WELL OR WOOUtTlOlt 1EU.
CMWNO WtTEIt UMPUE ti>C*'10 IM CEOMIOBE OR SOTOSCMC BCSINC;
trm WU
y-....
HE
C~B COMCatWHTlO'l (>>aA) caouw<]rA-rEB EIEVTON S0_ SAMPLE. LOCJH OH
MoriMrW ScolB; 1" 60" Verllcol Scote: 1" - 10"
CiWoratB, Rwat)iition
- ..^-'-".;';.'. ''.~TM'
ASH019889 EID630321
ASH019890 EID630322
Ohio River Public Wate
Systems
ASH019892 EID630324
^'
Ohio River PWS Summary (in ug
f +5 ' +3
'0
^ -3 ^ -18 w -30 w -40
' -42
-45 w -48 w -50
Parkersburg Bel Pre
LHWA
Lubbeck Tuppers PL Ravenswood Mason Cty
Letart LF Racine L&D Vm.of Racine Vill of Syracuse
ND
.1-.3 .8-8.2 .2-1.0 .2-.7
ND NQ-.l
.518
ND
ND-.41
Surface Water Summary (mu
^ Transect 1 ^ Transect 2 ^ Transect 3 ^ Transect 4 ^ Transect 5 ^ Transect 6 ^ Transect 7 ^ Transect 8 ^ Trasnect 9 ^ Transect 10 ^ Transect 11/12
-18
-42(Letart)
ND (2 samp) ND (2 samp) ND (2 samp) ND (9 samp) ND (10 samp) ND (9 samp)
.09-.13 (2 sam .9-1.1 (2 sam .29 (2 samp) .23 (2 samp) .1 (4 samp)
WVDEP Multi-Media Cons
Order-Water Sampling Upd
MMCO Water Sampling Up
^ Have completed the following: Off-sites 1 mile and 2 mile radius sampling Monthly sites sw/gw sampling (4 rounds), n Monthly sites putfall sampling PWS System sampling (now qtrly at 3 facil Ohio River sw sampling Sites plume delineation field work (28 new installed, gw/sw sampling full event just co
^ To complete: Water sampling final report Groundwater modeling final report
Intentionally Blank
Flow Path-lines
"^sssy
Little Hocking Water Association Well F
LHWA-Groundwater Travel Times (in d
MI
H
0
Ci
w
0
ha
S g ^
^
w
U3
0
0