Document byygg0621RMEY23Dbzkpzo3o

FILE NAME: General Electric (GE) DATE: 1926 June 7 DOC#: GE061 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter to Gerard Swope, GE gull^HoubW j&iof " in , >f $ u Sltb, 1 I 6. Grd SWop, P resident, general letrio Company, ' 3,20 Broadway, ' - * MeWYork* 3S. Y*- Dear Grard tfhen you to ld me to send'my re p o rts to Mr* P r a tt, you w ill remember you s a id th a t, i f ever Y wanted to b rin g anything to your s p e c ia l a tte n tio n , I might send ;ybu s is a o.py* 1 do want you to see ahat i h a v -% itt h about* ; P itts f ie ld , and I enclose a copy w ith t h i s , , | u m h a v e . seen the rep o rt prepared by the Medical gbrnmitfee a f t e r fb e ir b i a i t there in--which. they urged th a t a .rehYdent phyieitf be appointed to ta k e charge. My l e t t e r emphasdes. the neoess it y of th is but ta k es up two o th e r qu estio n s a ls o . Please do not-, think th a t 1 am drawing two-dark p ic tu re of th iig litp l* S tre e te r departm ent, i was. r e a lly shocked to :see th t i t was as bd a s the worst storage, b attery p la n t in .the country Jb I told Mr, In s u ll .(a good B ritis h e r) i t would be closed a t short notice in England by the Factory Inspection department As for. the Gspaoitor s itu a tio n I oan only say th a t i f you d adopt th e n itro b en so l method you are going t o ;have tro u b le -in s p its of: what your, young chemists t e l l you.,- >M$+-,i>yer? -of -lynn has handled i t . With the gayest reck lessn e ss and be-A^v-r fee poisoned but then P ro fesso r van p e tte n k o flr m th>: e a rly day's of bacteriology drank a liquid culture of oholera j$rftsYid.it never hurt him a p a r ti l e , n ev erth eless, mhe GhOlIra germ-is not e safe thing to play with. The Medical Committee seems to be working very w ell, and Dr. Schubmehl has come into lin e sp le n d id ly * The conference ju s t held in Boston was very good. Hone o f the G, E. physicians held fo rth . They hsd a small number of e x p e rts who spoke, and then answered q u estio n s, which was e x a c tly what the physicians wanted. Miss k in n a 's work seems to have been su ccessfu l so f a r as the production of a ch a ir is opncernedl ..It i s one of three which w ill probably be accepted as stan d ard s f o r the Company. She does not seem , however, to have been su c c e s sfu l in her re la tio n s with the men she has had to work w ith and I doubt whether they w ill wish to keep h e r . The BhyBicians.' Committee has advised against sending her to the d iffe re n t p la n ts to make stu d ie s of' the . seatin g problems. I am very sorry th a t she has had so l i t t l e ta c t end wisdom fox I b e lie v e she is clev er and ca p ab le. PLAINTIFF'S 1 usxW I