Document by0g6ko53ppEyKG5qzvXNbQpo

A R Xlr03W BOILING POINT TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: N-Ethylperfluorooctanesulfonamide; may also be referred to as U1464, EtFOSA, EtPOSA, F-6309, or FX-12. (1Octanesulfonamide, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8heptadecafluoro-N-ethyl-, CAS # 4151-50-2) Remarks: Material is a white solid of uncharacterized purity. M E T H O D _______________________________________________________ Method: The boiling point was determined as a part of the OECD Guideline 104, "Vapor Pressure Curve, Dynamic Method" study. GLP (Y/N): No Year completed: 1998 Remarks: Extrapolation method used. RESULTS________________________________________________________ Remarks: Laboratory testing was not completed. Values were extrapolated using the temperature and pressure curves obtained for the test substance during the vapor pressure study. The extrapolations are below: Pressure (mm Hg) Boiling Tem p., C 42 171.6 58 178.8 68 181.8 86 186.4 94 190.2 760 423 f = 0.9961 Pressure (mm Hg) Boiling Tem p., C 47 75 86 95 106 760 f = 0.9960 174.4 183.8 188 191 193 407 CONCLUSIONS Remarks: The boiling point of the test substance was estimated using temperature and pressure curves. 006003 DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking = 3. Results are from extrapolation. These studies lack analytical data for determination of the sample purity. REFERENCES Study conducted at the request of 3M Company by AScI Corporation, Duluth, MN O T H E R ___________________________________________ ' Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133 Last changed: 5/18/00 006004 *ROM flScI Corp. PHONE NO. : 218 722 2592 Nov. 30 1998 04:31PM P2 *"%~ 1 J I " November 30, 1998 ASd Corporation 4444 Airpark Boulevard, Duluth, M innesota 5 5 8 11 { 2 18) 7 2 2 -4 0 4 0 Fax ( 2 18) 7 2 2 -2 5 9 2 M s. Susan Beach 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services 935 Bush Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55133 Dear Ms. Beach: I am writing in response to your request of boiling point information for test items U1463 and U1464. Unfortunately we did not obtain empirical values for the boiling point of either item. Although experimental values were not obtained, we did extrapolate values using the temperature and pressure curves obtained for both items. The tables below summarize the extrapolations. Test Item U1463 ^SlhgTcinp. (C) Pressure (mm Hg) Soiling Temp. (Cj 42 174.6 37 172.2 | 55 179.0 48 176.4 | 67 187.2 68 188.2 | 81 190.2 83 191.6 96 197.0 93 195.8 1 760 474 I 2=0.9902 760 482 ^0.9908 TtttJton V1464 42 171.6 58 178.8 68 181.8 83 186.4 94 190.2 760 423 i2**0.9961 f. . i . .V A ` / 47 ......... . .. 174.4 75 183.8 86 188.0 95 191.0 106 193.0 760 407 2.0.9960 | utmws FROM flScI Corp. PHONE NO. : 218 722 2592 Now. 30 1998 04:31PM P3 November 30, 1998 Ms. Beach - 3M Co. Page - 2 - I apologize that the extrapolated values were all we can provide. The boiling point for both compounds should have been determined before vapor pressure determination. Please call if you need further information. Sincerely, Joe Amato Deputy Director, AScI-ETD 006006