Document bqwX7bYJ6d0qeGq2gaKDyqLZ
FOSECO HINSEP INC. AIR SAMPLE/SURVEY DATA SHEET
PLAINTIFFS
EXHIBIT
I
Plant____
r.
Bldg.__ _
*
Locatiorf
//;- /
/?/* ' .'c>
Description of Sampling Area/Operations: ..
/'M XX
f * s* *
/
^
Date // ki / ), Dept.______________
-
s
/"' '/
2#<L
Time
t'
r** . y
, .** /
Air Sampler:
Type
.->/ c A / ''
S/N /3-&V-03rO
Sampling Data: Sample No.
/-/
Contaminant(s) Sampled
--
f*?
Blank No.
c. l rz i_
Type:
Area( )
Persona 1
Flow Meter Setting
^
^ .1 Time: '< to , J
Volume r2'/y y'-i
Sampling Rate
Tota 1 . *' Sampled By
min.
-
()
*/
Samp 1e Ana lysis:
Weight:
Tare
^72
Gross
^
(
Net J-.OOfc
Results
32..^"
Commen ts Uolc. flluff"
i` C.*sZfh>
Date
ajJ*J 7^ -fc&k._____________
Survey Comments: If we assume the "free silica" content of the dust sampled was 10Z, --3
the permissible would be approx. 2.5 mg/m (OSHA). If it had no free silica, the
nuisance dust permissible of 15 mg/mJ (OSHA) would apply. The 8-hr TWA may or
may not be over 15, but is probably over 2.5 mg/m^.
2261
FOS--00--0000803675
7/75
FOSECO HINSEP INC. AIR SAMPLE/SURVEY DATA SHEET
Plant Ck^jL-Q.
Da tc %'\X> "7S
Time
__ tSH+-
'< D 3____ PM
Bldg.
Dept. f)%________
Location LiU PfatA*---
# 3.
Description of Sampl ing/Area/Operationl: fy/^sOiJLyP^--
_______
yx^J- ( &p s^p&del .
rf'lvcS >
1 /6r /jjtjct.
f?Uy
tir> -M. Mhto OJZ.Cjd. JJL.
7
As j*.
Air Sampler:
Sampling Data: Sample No._ Contaminant(s) Sampled^
*..' /.
___ Blank No.(7 L~--
d/Ssjt~
jfrzsfljkl
/
Type:
Area( )
Flow Meter Setting
7
T i me: D 1^3 to 0- f 3^
Vo Iume
3s\-Lje.
Persona
2_ Sampling Rate ^ .
Total /fe? Sampled By
ttWaA
()
Sample Analysis:
Weight:
Tare .
Results
II, fi ttf -Z"-
Commen ts wo leat*. e/m*/1
/I
Gross
-hsr:?
Net (S. ^rST2.
______________________________ Date
4;lh~ |9atf At Ho*f~ avft-l***
_&il---oil a fir..
__yoer-t-
l**a/o-*/(s,,{ic.* afttif" Se
Survey Comments: Result vas belov OSHA nuisance dust permissible of 15 mst/aP, but
/
if "free silica1' content was at least 52 (previous survey result for platform), silica permissible vould be A.3 ng/m^. Sample not considered good averafef by
surveyor due to short sample time and changing conditions.___________
2262
FQS--00-0000003676
7/75
2263
FQS-00-0000003677
FOSECO MINSEP INC. AIR SAMPLE/SURVEY DATA SHEET
PI ant Bldg.
,Date a/zo/is-
ZzlO
DPt. Q/n____Pfst -fnr-x*
Location 2-02.QQ ^UlpPdnn Pn 2 d Plrhnd
To
Description of Sampling Area/Operations: Ojizr-jfh*-------- hldfbznfrj! St^llh/nnfli
' Nor\ -as^esfos v*i.xV,h^ oppj-atroyis fsfifea;^eg?^/V
Qppr-ator- *ie.ar-.%ia face, vn 2sk .
Sctfl/ftu J
0i2Tdz.
Load trig
&
r-eWlor
L
-
7 rntnu
0 Shn\/elfL
___________ gafF/OVCIi/Tq
jf
^Pi^iq .----:
y^//y
COpM -died? 7qLj yne>$h- 'HaiSdfal? ItZtfJbg
-
Zi M?ytutz.s>
C^Lass-^fc ^5/^p/g. neu/ork tandfn* --__
Type ff!Sf\ forLahie. Pump S/N 8>-Q8-~Ql4`
Sampling Data:
Sample No.
CL-3_____________________
Blank No.______ .
Contaminant (s) Sampled S" Tc.3 3 fidMui^`anc.e.
^/
"bust
Type:
Area( )
Flow Meter Setting______2
Personal OQ
_____ ______________________________< >
Sampling Rate__2.ju4L^-
r,~:&13 Oho 2!5-q PM.
Volume________ 8/,+JL
Tota 1 _2Z mm. Sampled Bya fl.g. 1M?
Sample Analysis:
Weight:
Tare
^h.o^o
Gross
Results
"2.0.+ we
_____________________________
Comwits I .os-e Ltf l'. Cmstffu w.r
Net J.toblpHj Date_ eAi.hr
^r,' !h,
Survey Comments: /<Lrit r/at?c/7-r J}ur?na^ morrt'rfo hoursj JS. jfior-e* Mu St iYI the.
riRp Ynafer-hls
Fart
Cl~2SS L/erttfiztfon
a'trtr- 'MotioneA ikdt there
q ruling. Jsd&L
Jtm=.csM&rk.
1
fau) wzter t s/j-- flluMho jf/tczfk
Ur ;
2264
vA/0 "-3 S Tt *71 uC. ^ ifZdg ^5-00-0000003678
7/75
Survey Comments: Result was over OSHA nuisance dust permissible of 15 ng/n\ Duse probably had some "free silica" content, but would be too difficult to estiraace. If more dust in AM, 8-hr TwA is probably over 2D.4 mg/c^.
2265
FaS-00-000003o7`3
FOSECO HINSEP INC. AIRSAMPlE/SURVEY OATA SHEET
CJLP1 an t________________________
Date_ elx.ohf' T i ne_
Bldg.
ftcus*-..
Dept. ' 0 H~_________
Location
J2&d-itSgSir-^!v<v4iAWi. 8*'-*to~a
'' J
7...... ""----------------- ----------------------------------------- )
Description of Sampling Area/Operations
OaJ>^
----------
AH PM
Ii 1
Air Sampler:
Type
030+
S/H
Sampling Data: Sample No.
L H~
Blank No.
c c-Ql
Contaminant(s) Sampled
Type:
Area( )
Flow Meter Setting
Personal (>0 ^
Sampling Rate
()
3L>0 &/****.
Time: 'C1. 7 to
Tota 1
2~1 mJ n.
) Vo 1 ume
3
Sampled By
/
FQS-00-a000003fc62l
Survey Comments: Result was over OSHA nuisance dust permissible of 15 Hoc enough RM data to make estimate if."free silica" was present.
Operation was not typical, R & D was in progress.
2267
FOS-00-0000003oai
FOSECO MINSEP INC. AIR SAMPLE/SURVEY DATA SHEET
UL^>1L,--Q.
Plant
Date <3 00-7<T
? *07 ~ r
Time Q ' /7_____ PM
Sampling Data: Sample No._ DW3
Blank No.
V. A,
Can tar. i nar. t {s} Samp *. ea
Type:
Area( )
__________ Persona 1 (>4^
___________
P^l
Flow Meter Setting *7_____________________
Sampling Rate ^,
Time: P <Q~? to P /?"
Volume
3.3.1 JL
Total ( (
TIMSampled By
()
Sample Analysis:
Weight:
Tare
'
Gross
Results 3 0,3 iLfcJjnL
L*JCommen ts____ I Ht ivJtJ t`
*C _C&MA
Net
Da te '8/2.4*/? S'
fP LtjLicL U/ M
Survey Comments: Result* was oyer OS HA asbestos 8-hr permissible of 5. and also
oyer, permissible may, of 10 fihers/&e. Operator. however. vallce-d Into draft with open spile bag of asbestos which possibly blev some asbestos onto filter. Aa stated, longer sample vould be-needed to make more valid asaeasmenc, especially regarding 8-hr TWA, if we assume operator breathed aqme concentra-
tion filter collected, max, permissible was exceeded.
2268
FOS--00-0000003682
7/75
--, ^
/ / 7fc Au p* '-9-'' _^-5:
*"
, 7-
;J'-XL-, '
/?A? '
./:.' .i *1,
^'- ov
'/- -f `
,
/ /* s* ,1
7
( A / u" C/.<&C:J. /rr--- A-'-^ a
-v. ^
( V '.^),*^-r.'-
V
'*\ '
^'JC</1 C
/ .-
/Vt "
/
-
.( \'
V/
p~p/,'?\J( o"*
v,'4:
Jrv^ -
'zz---
^ /(, 'I'!'Tlj^CiSc
tZ6~
*&Jl-.s-st&t*.'-
-- .222 ,-xj2,_- ,pH'~t.pJ. r- aj!t^Xr
05
4,
,/
/^(^/y
y^SU^C^jZj f/ {-s/? ^&S~l .{AJlci-C-/
sCtLLX- i '
CT^cA /Xa/t .<ds
'$ ^4-KAe^Pts-Jk.
e~- ^co-/rist ///jL
JhC^^J/ y/&
2269
FQS-ea-0a000036S3
o
s>
\
0 G O
i;
\
1
i
i i