Document bgpvyx3b6Lyqp2axnDrXpj3y
Ref. Ares(2023)3666686 - 26/05/2023
IRIE EST
PFAS in EU foodpackaging ~ EC meeting 24/11/2021
-
7
m
& cis
Lille]
4
"s=e . VA
RNSS
Where? 6 European countries: Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom
Who? Joint study between 9 civil society organisations o
aia E52@(Bg) CHE"M [EE pegennereati:ons year
Qanp T= ForbrTuogenrkradet coer:
Key findings
i
|
-> Direct exposure of EU citizens consuming takeaways
em
= Direct environmental contamination via composting
= EES ERE AVE SER EE RE EIS ITS
"Sel 4. No PFAS treatment in country with regulation in place (Denmark)
-> PFAS-free alternatives available on the market
Key implications
PI pe Er TTT
<% Np LL
gr!
A o
03)
Jey db).
y4
Highly persistent and harmful forever chemicals' used
in single use products designedfor the bin
!
=> In total opposition with a zero pollution/toxic free
ec]
Ain EUfood packaging -- EC meeting 24/11/2021
Commission's commitments in the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability
i
TR
TY
+
EE>s23
<i
ET
a rr preppy
where they are essential for society
Key short- to mid-term opportunities to act
=> Ensure the restriction covers the full range of PFAS and
has only limited derogations
( \4
=> Propose and adopt the restriction by the end of 2022
oe
3. Act in the meantime to protect exposed consumers and
WN communities
Background
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance-s PFAS
> 4000 PFAS and counting
BEE Eisggl 5 =b `
wl
gz ama
5
pe
a
Et
i
-
wisA Al : B Yara
a=
\
Eo me
Urgency to stop the accumulation of PFAS in the environment and our bodies
>PFAS, the Forever Chemicals,
are the most persistent
synthetic chemicals known to
ets
Continuous emission means
increasing levels ii n the environment
` >The more we learn about their impact on human health and the environment, the more concerning it is
Human Studies Suggest
PFAS May.
ETT
wr
IR,
K
hg> TTT
mimitni
EET
LS l i a R]
T fon rkgiy, Py
Cen : in] 2 pl| sueelle
SV Batlle Ld
pa @
Sge"
Key issues related to PFAS in disposable food packaging
f3e
L
|J
EE)
)S
kx i, i
+ Potential migration to the food >
x
+ Single use products designed tobe thrown away >high t + Environmental emissions atproduction and disposal stages > cont
tal + Contaminationofthepaper and boardrecycling chain => barrier to cle
Key findings and conclusions
The use of PFAS in food packaging is a widespread practice in Europe
> PAS intentionally used in food raph2 Total Organic Fluorine content of takeaviay food packaging from global fastfood
packagin
fast food
g
c
from
hains
popular glo
and other
bal
~~
<"
%noun
o
x
takeaway restaurants
--
noes
>320utof d2 samples analysed =
=
intentionally treated with PFAS
i
> tis not an isolated practice
'
5
=
nis
Fo bare Poh | stdin ets
a4 > Highest PFAS levels found in moulded tpalabnltewfaibrree sfooloddapsascuksatgaiinngabalned aclotnetranianteirvses to single-use plastic
8
Reads: bepulp, go natural, Compostable
>PFAS have been detected in every. EP AY [re
> PAS in foodpackiasagbairrinergto
recycling andto a clean andsafe
circular economy
x
ib
ne
X
--_
--
SELL |
PRR
errs set iy
UE S----_
Sy
So a, )
_
Regulation is the strongest incentive for companies to move away from PFAS
> Same item tested in 3 countries
-
(bought in Dec. 2020)
.=
> In Denmark, the use of PFAS in f -
paperand board food packaging ~~
has been banned since July 2020 =fm
=> DcoKntseanmtpolfealhladsatmhpelleoswteessttTedOF E0w
> Companies able to find alternatives ~*~
when regulation is in place
8
iNatnionialon
pestering
-
oma --
eavina| J[egme
" connote
P=
onions| JEer w
w [a
ES
PEASinEU foodpackaging ~ EC meeting 24/11/2021
PFAS in food packaging: an example of non-essential uses
d
+ By definition and design, single-use packaging = used for very short durations and then thrown away
-
{ + This contrasts with the extreme persistenceofall PFAS
Alternatives to PFAS treatments already exist
) < -)
I
--
. safe, durable and reusable packaging and tableware are
widely available
> The treatmentof disposable items withPFASisa typical
>
example of unnecessary and avoidable chemical uses
--: -- -
All PFAS or their degradation product are highly persistent
/i ! b
dN J
SC1 i Aa i 1
The body burden is irreversible and environmental
contamination extremely challenging/impossible to reverse
if -
=
~
Ee
2 The more we learn about different PFAS, the more toxic they appear
Our recommendations for the restriction in development:
i>n tThoeirnecslturidcetitohne, including chemicals
p=>acTkoaggiunagraanntdeetatbhlaetwdairsepoissacbolveerfeododwithin its scope
9
A >
ey "dh
hs
29)
,
P ph ee er sa i e
a
i er
2021. Throwaway Packaging,
J. PT
Forever Chemicals: Europeanwide survey of PFAiSn disposable food
er 4
PT
SO
Al
x
Linktothefull report:
|
hitps://english.arnika.org/publications/throwaway-packaging-forever-
chemicals european-wide-survey-of:pfas-in-disposabl-food-packaging:
mE me
Ee
ar) ) Eqyoe
ARNIKR -- bi
gre
IE
@sunp
s TE Forbrugerridet
T[FLEE
BEE
oegenertaitions ClliieentEarth2