Document baM3zK4meGLKmqNZRx51q3mg1
t
Chemical & Engineering News WASHINGTON, D. C.
W. 128,000
JUi. :0 IC!78 Growing pains
SIR: American Hoechst's president (C&EN, June 12, page 12) casually referred to "harassment" by civic groups as delaying the company's pro* posed Bayport plant. The term is "democratic due process." If Mr. Brookhuis doesn't under stand the difference, perhaps he should transfer to Hoechst A.G., where in Germany the National Kohlenwerke has the power to level whole towns in the name of progress; maybe Brookhuis can win the same consideration for Hoechst.
Hoechst proposes to build in the purlieus of seven established bayshore communities. Hoechst's property line is only a few hundred feet from people's homes at some points! Since many of the bayshore residents work in the chemical industry and/or have technical back grounds, they understand with a terrible clarity the consequences of a major accident and they are fearfully aware of our lack of knowledge of the long-term effects of exposure to low-level emissions of suspected carcinogens.
Hoechst has touted the proposed plant as one of the "cleanest and safest ever built." Unfor tunately that's not clean enough. For example,
it was discovered during subsequent Texas Air
Control Board hearings on the proposed adjacent
Bechtel-Goodrich plant that the fugitive chlorine
emissions from Bechtel-Goodrich and the fugi
tive and calculated vent emissions of styrene and
ethylbenzene from Hoechst are of sufficient
concentration to form an extremely potent la-
crimator. This lacrimator plagued Dow's Midland
facility in the 1940's [Air Pollution and Smoke
Prevention Association of America. Proceed
ings, 45, 61 (1952)] and the Washington Bottom
Area near Parkersburg, W.Va., in the late 1960's
[National Center for Air Pollution Control (HEW)
Technical Report, "Parkersburg, W.Va.--Mar
ietta, Ohio, Air Pollution Abatement Activity"
March 1967, and subsequent addenda].
I and many others do not regard Hoechst as
a desirable close neighbor. I do not feel that our
opposition to the site location, which has been
expressed through the proper regulatory chan
nels, is harassment.
G. A. Cabat, Ph.D.
La Porte, Tex.
,j .
21949001
4
BFG17343