Document ba9Yn7Yo7brY0R0voj1g2vdE0

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION OLD RIOGE8URY ROAD. DANBURY CONN 0681 7 LAW DEPARTMENT March 26, 1986 ?:: r j| . * chi TO: R. A. Butler |l! E3 262 Ir RE: Sauveur Esquembre, et al v. Union Carbide I Corporation, et al - Case Number L-087117-|4 Lottie Memice, et al v. PPG Industries, Ini., et al., including UCC - Case Number L-20509-86 I have attached for your handling the above two referenced cases which, as we discussed, were mistakenly routed to me. Due to the pending deadline of the Memice case, I secured a 20 day extension, the maximum permitted under New Jer fey practice, for the due date of Union Carbide's answer, which renders the answer due on April 19|^h. The answer in the Esquembre case is due within of date of service, which appears to have been 12, 1986, rendering the answer due by April 16, AJG:j r Att. Alan Jay Gerson ..RECEIVED P. F. DAVEY "conIdent^0 AND SUBJECTTotn?TER,AL foSTECT,VE | UCC 076913 U../ON carbide corporation OLD fl'OGE8Uv HOAD. OANBURY CONN 068'7 LAW DEPARTMENT March 26, 1986 TO: R. A. Butler E3 262 RE: Sauveur Esquembre, et al v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al - Case Number L-087117-84 Lottie Memice, et al v. PPG Industries, Inc., et al., including UCC - Case Number L-20509-86 I have attached for your handling the above two referenced cases which, as we discussed, were mistakenly routed to me. Due to the pending deadline of the Memice case, I secured a 20 day extension, the maximum permitted under New Jersey practice, for the due date of Union Carbide's answer, which renders the answer due on April 19th. The answer in the Esquembre case is due within 35 days of date of service, whichT appears to have been March 12, 1986, rendering the answer due by April 16, 1986. AJG:jr Att .w^- Alan Jay Gerson A i i ;^ PRIVILEGED AND "CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER" UCC 076914