Document bBa9zm4d8Yqv5nvoe7QV3zLjZ

FILE NAME: Asbestos Cement Pipe and Sheet (ACPS) DATE: DOC#: ACPS0 KhMENT DESCRIPTION:W - The Acute Effects of Chrysotile Asbestos Exposure on Lung Function ----- _. -.-::::::.:: _:::::.-:.-.-.-.-.-:::::: ... :::::::.::...-:. --:-:-:-.--.--;-:-:-::-:-:-:-.--.-. .: . . -:: .: :. . -. --. --: 1-: . . - .-.-.------------ ._ .. : : .: : :: ::: ::::: ~: -- .. --. .. -.----- ..-- --- _ _-:- ---------------::.:::::: ... .---------. . .--. .------ __ .------------ ..-- .. -- -------- ----------- .._ .... -------------------- l 0 0 -:_-._;-_.;-;;:,-,r:_:_-~ . . : : : ; : . : _ . ----- The Acute Effects of Chrysotile Asbestos Exposure on Lung Function1 KEITH W. HARLEss,2 SuETARO WATANABE, AND ATTILIO D. RENZETTI, JR. 3 Pulmonary Division of the University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132 Received August 8, 1977 !_______________ _ .:.-:--:. .-..-.-..--. ..-._._.--._-..__-.-__. ... ..-..-. . [ - -. ,: : ..:-, . 1- cc-,-------- -- I :~:::::: '": -----. --- - - -- . '-:::~:-.-:-:--.-.. _. - ------ ..-.-::...:::.- ...-..-..- ft)::,:i,~:~:_::-'.> --------- .-.-.....-...::: ...... ..::::-.::::::::::;. '[>:'.?'?:--_ F--- . ~~~~;~~;;;;-:;;;: ' t . ..... . [/\\~:://\- t:..... -..,-.- ....... _ [-------- --------~-~.~:~-:.-:_:_- .-~-::~~~~~--.-. iL\t~L/:: - ;~ -~-------------- ~~~~~ ~~: ~:_: _:_: :_:_:_~_~_ - [~:.::::::::;:;:-: f.:::::::.-..-_-_-_ ~:_:~.~:~::~::~:_:_::_: E;:::-::.-:: :_-_:_-_:_-_-::. L-- ...::_ :: 't:.:_:_:,:.:~-.:.:..:.:.:.::~--- ~-:_;_:_~~::_:;_,_:_;_::: i=:::: ::: ::.-:.-:::__:: ~-:-.:. ~.c::::-----.-:: it~~:~~~:;: I ---~----- I ----- --------...-.-.-.-.. ;;.-:.--:.:. .-_...-.-_-.:, t-:::::::::::.:::-.::. ....-....-..-..o..<...... --------..-.- .-------- - ..---- ""::..... .............-.-.-..-.-... '"'""""''--.... I --~- I ------ ---- ' , ..:::::::::::::::::::...._:----------4;------""""''''"''"::.,.-,.-."'"'"""""""'-.-,.._,,.------'~'-'='"'"_',-~co::::----;- E:-:VIRO:-:~![:>;TAL RESEARCH 16, 360 - 372 (1978) The Acute Effects of Chrysotile Asbestos Exposure on Lung Function1 KEITH W. HARLEss,2 SuETARO WATANABE, AND ATTILIO D. RENZETTI, JR. 3 Pulmonary Dil'ision of the University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132 Received August 8, 1977 Lung function was determined in 23 men 1.5 months after an intense 5-month exposure to chrysotile asbestos using spirometry, plethysmography for determination of lung volumes and specific conductance, single breath nitrogen washout for determination of closing volume, and rest and postexercise arterial blood gas analysis. Although no man showed evidence of restriction, 12 of the 23 had documented airflow obstruction. Eight months following exposure, 16 of the 23 had a repeat pulmonary evaluation. This included the repetition of all previous testing and determination of the diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide and pulmonary compliance. Three men developed airflow obstruction, as determined by the closing volume, during the interval of study. Seventeen of the 23 had airflow obstruction documented on either the initial or follow-up study. Of these 17, 12 were nonsmokers, current light smokers (less than 10 pack years), or ex light smokers. It is concluded that acute intense chrysotile asbestos exposure causes airflow obstruction. INTRODUCTION Chronic exposure to asbestos fiber is a well-known health hazard. Such exposure can cause a diffuse interstitial fibrosis (asbestosis) of the lung, carcinoma of the lung and gastrointestinal tract, mesothelioma, plaques, and calcifications of the pleura and asbestos corns of the skin (Becklake, 1976). Although these chronic effects of asbestos are recognized, we are not aware of any reports describing the effects of an acute and limited exposure to asbestos fibers. This report is concerned with studies of lung function of construction workers immediately following and 8 months after an intense 5-month exposure to chrysotile asbestos fibers. The results indicate that airflow obstruction may be an early manifestation of such exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS Asbestos exposure. The exposure occurred during construction of the Automotive Trades Building at the Utah Technical College in Orem, Utah between December 1975 and May 1976. The building is large, and inside finishing work was being completed during these months. Concrete asbestos Flexboard manufactured by the Johns- Mansville Corp. and containing 30% chrysotile asbestos was being used to cover all inside walls of the building for fire protection. The asbestos Flexboard was cut inside the building with an unventilated portable power saw for 1 Supported in part by the Parker B. Francis Foundation. z A Parker B. Francis Foundation Fellow in Pulmonary Research. Present address: Bend Memorial Clinic, 1501 Northeast Medical Center Drive, Bend, Oregon. 3 Author to whom requests for reprints should be sent. 360 0013-935 l/78/0163-0360$02.00/0 Copynght 1978 by Academic Press, Inc All nghts of reproducllon in any form reserved i ..... 1 . . . ACUTE ASBESTOS EXPOSL'RE AND LUNG fUi\C'rION 361 installation around electrical outlets, ventilation ducts, rafters, doors, and corners. Cutting occurred throughout the 5 months on most days. The building was kept closed because of the cold winter months. The concentration of asbestos in the air was not quantitated during the period of exposure. Workers stated it was always dusty, making it difficult at times to see across the building. Some workers reported leaving the building occasionally because of discomfort in breathing the dust. The chips and dust from the cutting were swept into piles periodically. Only one man reported occasionally wearing a protective respirator and observed no other workers doing so. Immediately following the job closure, air sampling was conducted by the Environment Health Services Branch of the Utah State Division of Health and all workers were advised by their respective employers to be examined by a physician. The method used for the sampling was that stipulated in the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) (U.S. Occupational Health and Safety Administration, 1972) on 0.8-,m membrane filters. The results of the air sampling activities are summarized in Table 1. Additionally, grab samples of the dust on the floor of the building were analyzed and contained from 1 to 30% asbestos fiber. The OSHA standard for airborne asbestos exposure is 5.0 fibers greater than 0.5 ,m in length per cubic centimeter of air (flee) as an 8-hr time-weighted average and a 10 'cc maximum for any-time exposure. On July 1, 1976, the average limit was reduced to 2.0 'cc and the maximum exposure standard of 10 Vee remained the same. Since the air samples were taken after job closure during simulated conditions (but without the asbestos Flexboard being cut or men actively working), the results in Table 1 are probably underestimates of the actual fiber density encountered by the men. TABLE 1 ASBESTOS Co:--cE:s;TRATIONS IN THE AIR AT Co:s;sTRUCTJON SITE WHERE RECENT EXPOSURE OccuRREDa Date Activity during sampling Minutes of collection fibers/ccb 5- 7-76 Sweeping and moving scaffolding Drilling holes in the Flex board 20 3.84 14 6. 18 25 0.57 5-25-76 After all cleaning completed Walking around on inspection 15 0.00 Slapping Flexboard walls 7 0.64 During collection of grab samples 74 0.06 Area sample 78 O.o2 6-3-76 During installation of fiberglass insulation 28 0. 15 " Sampling completed by the Utah State Division of Health. Occupational Safety and Health Acts Standard is 2 asbestos fibers/cc of air as an 8-hr timeweighted average and 10 fibers/cc as an any-time exposure. 362 HARLESS, WATA:--:ABE, AND RENZETTI Historical information from employers and from each examined man was used to estimate the duration of each man's exposure to the asbestos. The number of hours worked and exposed to the asbestos per day was multiplied by the number of working days and is reported as total hours for each man. For analysis, the exposures of the men were categorized as light (less than 199 hr), moderate (200 to 499 hr), and heavy (greater than 500 hr). Those men cutting the asbestos Flexboard were considered to have heavy exposure. Subjects. Approximately 79 men were exposed and 23 of these referred themselves for pulmonary evaluation. Their initial examination occurred an average of 45 days (21) after their last exposure day. This evaluation included a history, physical examination, pulmonary function testing, and standard chest radiography. Seven months following the initial evaluation, 16 of the original 23 accepted a return invitation. History, physical examination, pulmonary function testing, and chest radiography were repeated with the additional measurements of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO), and static, quasi-static, and dynamic pulmonary compliance. The demographic data of the 23 workers (all men) initially evaluated are summarized in Table 2. The length of the acute asbestos exposure was variable for individual men. The mean was 518 hr (344; range, 6 to 896 hr). The median was 623 hr and the mode was 896 hr. Four men had once been exposed to asbestos but considered it to be light exposure, i.e., less than 1 week. None of these four knew ' the fiber type(s) or density for their prior exposure. Eight men (35%) had never smoked cigarettes. Ten (43%) were smoking at the time of the study but six of these had smoked 10 pack-years or less. Five (22%) were ex-smokers, having smoked 10 pack-years or less in the past (average = 7.4 pack-years; range, 3 to 20; average time after quitting= 8 years; range, 2 to 19 years). Nine men (39%) had no prior history of respiratory symptoms or disease. Seven (30%) had a history of seasonal rhinitis. However, only one had ever consulted a physician because of symptoms and none of the seven had had symptoms for at least 5 months prior to testing. Four (17%) had chronic bronchitis, and three (13%) had a remote history of pneumonia. Only one man (No. 2) reported having continuous symptoms during the exposure which were related to exacerbation of his asthma. Three others (Nos. 9, 12, and 23) experienced temporary difficulty breathing during their asbl!stos exposure. One (No. 23) had acute pharyngitis associated with the exposure, causing him to quit work and following which he had a spontaneous recovery. All men were asymptomatic for acute respiratory infections at the time of their evaluation and had been so for at least the previous 2 months. Chest radiographs were interpreted by a board-certified radiologist without knowledge of the men's exposure history or lung function. Pulmona,y function studies. The following procedures were done in the seated position: (1) Spirometric measurements were made with either a 13.5-liter Collins spirometer or a 13.5-liter waterless spirometer manufactured by Cardio-Pulmonary Instruments. The forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in l sec (FEV1), and the flow between 25 and 75% of the FVC (FEF25-15o/c) were measured n "' :::i [j') .... ;. ;. ~-<rg__s~ c c:: - .., [j') .., < g '< (1) (1) ....,....,o . ...., .., 0,.. (') C'":" 0 3- :-:: 0 ;::s I CJ) ..., - .., Cf> '-: (1) p (1) 0 !=. 9 5 o' C. ~ p:, C <1> '-0 (1) [/) >< X :(1:); (J;-:Q:s"O0I J-v "O tn. :J. t:: 0 .-+ 0 0 .....,,. 0 0 '-< 0 ::,- -- ;:r ~- ::i >< (1) < ;::s ~ OQ 0 (1) :,;- 0 5 ;::s [/) (1) er <<C: .i:.:.:,. [p/:), (D 3 .., I 3 5 ;:;- 3 a. ::r- C: ~ IV v, !J ('I) W /Jl - ,......,..(/0 ........ ,..., ,......,.. "'O - 0 ("I) (t) ?:::iT<c.~, ....,, 0 I J f -, :y "' :Jo .. :u3r.ic(/) ('t) 0 ..-1' ~ ;x ..... ::r(l)Q(l; I Q (1; .., ...., Q.. -~,,,,.,,,,<')~I" ,~--~-"-""' ....."--- ,-~~ - a-,~,~ ' " ' ._ .,... ,._--,i- r - ~~- - TABLE 2 AGE, PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, VOCATION, ASBESTOS EXPOSURE, CIGARETTE SMOKING HABITS, AND PRIOR HISTORY OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE IN 23 MEN WITH RECENT ASBESTOS EXPOSURE Subject IdentifiNo. cation Age Height Weight (yr) (cm) (kg) Vocation Exposure (hr) Previous exposure Hx. Cigarette smoking hx. (yr ppd)" Previous respiratory disease or symptoms I MB 2 WC 25 180 81.4 Carpenter 896 No 32 184 75.0 Electrician 896 No 0 Seasonal rhinitis 0 Seasonal rhinitis, n asthma C -I 3 FC 50 173 84.0 Lather 200 No 0 None M (cutting) 4 LF 47 163 69.0 Supervisor 448 No 17 () None [j') to 5 CF 32 185 63.2 Electrician 896 No 0 Seasonal rhinitis M 6 GG 23 180 90.0 Carpenter 448 No 6 () None [j') -I 7 AG 23 183 ,o.o Electrician 160 No 0 None 0 8 DH 39 178 86.0 Electrician 623 No 15 (I) Chronic bronchitis [j') 9 JH 34 168 65.0 Electrician 896 No 0 None M 10 KK 41 178 96.6 Pipefitter 896 Yes 25 (I) Chronic bronchitis X '-::I II WK 39 180 88.0 Welder 712 Yes 25 (I) Chronic bronchitis 0 [j') 12 LM 45 185 112.5 Sheet metal 896 No Ex-sm; 19 yearsc; None C worker 10 (I) id 13 KP 23 172 70.0 Electrician 896 No Ex-sm; 6 years; Seasonal rhinitis M 7 () 14 NS 24 177 83.0 Laborer 70 No Ex-sm; 7 years; Seasonal rhinitis % t:i I (I) r 15 DS 39 175 83.2 Sheet metal 672 No 0 Pneumonia. 1971 C worker % 16 MT 35 169 l 7,7 Carpenter 896 Yes Ex-sm; 6 years; Seasonal rhiniti~ 0 (cutting) 6 () "'1 17 GA 47 180 91.6 Welder 125 No 25 () None C % 18 ED 23 189 77.0 Carpenter 672 Yes 10 (I) None n 19 JE 36 170 74.0 Mason 6 No 10 (I) Chronic bronchitis j 20 JM 22 185 83.0 Mason 9 No Ex-sm, 2 years; None 0 ;,: 3 (I) 21 BR 28 171 89.1 Laborer 208 No 10 (l) Seasonal rhinitis; pneumonia, I974 22 MR 23 183 87.3 Laborer 160 No 0 None 23 AP 26 175 ;3_9 Electrician 240 No 4 (I) Seasonal rhinitis. pneumonia, 1963 ' " ppd, packs per day. r, Ex-sm = Ex-smoker. \.;J c Number of years since stopping smoking. \.;J . c;r;i~ll!i~JJ1tlt!Jl'iip~;,,,Jf12;"'," l i, '!': t {:.: ' ' \.1-,, ";,, ,, ~ft' ,::. :;,, , l\-, ' it_', , f' . : .' it ~'.r}- _,, rr ..~l-:.', t, f:: i1 ' R, ( -1_ ; r ~ l,, 364 HARLESS, WATA:\'ABE, AND RE:-.'ZETTI manually from the spirometric record. The reported data are from the best test based upon the sum of FVC and FEV, of two or three spirometric records. Spirometric testing was completed before and after administration of 0.68 mg of aerosolized isoetharine with phenylephrine (Bronkometer). Normal values used were from the ITS Manual (lntermountain Thoracic Society, 1975). (2) Functional residual capacity (FRC), airway resistance (Raw), and thoracic gas volume (VTG) at which Raw was determined were measured by plethysmography according to the methods of DuBois et al. (1956a, b) using a constant volume plethysmograph described by Schmidt and Cohn (1961). Specific conductance (SGaw) was calculated from Raw and VTG (3) Total lung capacity (TLC) was determined by adding the plethysmographically determined FRC to the spirometrically determined inspiratory capacity (JC). Normal values used for FRC and TLC were from the ITS Manual. (4) Closing volume of the lung (CV) was measured by the nitrogen method. The subject exhaled at a constant flow rate, approximately 0.5 liters/sec into a Fleisch No. 3 pneumotachograph after maximal inspiration of 100% oxygen initiated at residual volume (RV), the signal of which was displayed on an oscilloscope facing the subject, integrated through a Hewlett- Packard VR 4000 Digital Pneumotach, and recorded on the x axis of a Hewlett- Packard 7045A X - Y Recorder. The percentage nitrogen (N2) was measured at the mouth using an ionizing N2 meter (Cardio-Pulmonary Instruments Nitrogen Analyzer 410), the output of which was displayed on the y axis of the X - Y Recorder. The apparatus dead space between the mouth and oxygen source was about 40 ml. Closing volume was taken as that volume at which a sudden inflection in N2 concentration above the slope of the alveolar plateau occurred. It was expressed as CVIVC%. Closing capacity (CC) was obtained by adding residual volume (RV) to the CV and was expressed as CC/TLC%. RV was obtained by subtracting the spirometrically determined expiratory reserve volume (ERV) from the measured FRC. Closing volume tests were administered by the authors and all measurements were checked for accuracy by one of us. Normal values for the CV/VC% and the CC/TLC% were those of Buist and Ross ( 1973). At least two satisfactory tracings were obtained, each 5 min apart, and the mean of the CV measurements was taken as the final result. (5) Arterial blood gases before and immediately after exercise were determined with the Radiometer BMS3 Mk2 Blood Micro System blood gas analyzer. The exercise performed was 1 min of stepping up and down a 20-cm-high stool. (6) DLCO was determined using the single-breath technique described by Ogil- vie et al. (1957). The expired gas sample was collected in a 2-liter bag and analyzed in a Beckman Medical gas analyzer LB-2 for CO. Normal values used were from the ITS Manual. (7) The pulmonary compliance was measured using an esophageal balloon (length, 10 cm; perimeter, 2.25 cm filled with 0.5 cc of air sealed over a polyethylene catheter, PE 200, i.d. = 1.40 mm) connected to a Statham PM 13 lTC (2.5 psid) transducer according to the method of Milic-Emili et al. (1964) and a Fleisch No. 3 pneumotachograph, whose signal was integrated for volume through a fast-responding integrator (Hewlett-Packard VR 4000). Pressure, volume, and flow were displayed on an oscilloscope and recorded on light-sensitive paper with l ! the use of elcctr piratory complia method c;irnilar t tion by pcriodic the closed airw FRC. A quasi-st Subject No. LL's(. ,,DC nr;;,---7- LC 11n ('lc) Normals 100 1 ,..(,t-{' 2 3 111 4 156 5 6 98 ,\ 7 105 8 139 1 9 107 10 88 11 123 12 122 13 81 14 107 15 120 16 106 17 132 18 98 19 96 20 107 21 94 22 109 23 116 Average IOi SD 1: n Abbre\ iat1on vital capacity: Fl and 75'7c of the / capacity: CC/TL, 0 Interrnounta1 ,. Watanabe el " Normal valu " Asterbks (" 1 N indicates r " Flows impro h An arrow (T capacity ('7c) re; t ACUTE ASBESTOS EXPOSURE A:-.;D LU'.\'G Fu:-.;cno'.\' 365 -~t test cords. . mg of s used 10racic ysmog_instant onduc- ,graphity (IC). the use of electronics manufactured by Electronics for Medicine. The static ex- piratory compliance (Cst) was measured by a stepwise expiration from TLC by a method similar to that of Turner ct al. (1968). The operator controlled the expira- tion by periodically closing the airway for 3 sec while the subject relaxed against J t the closed airway. Measurements were made over a range of 0.750 liter above FRC. A quasi-static expiratory compliance was also measured by a slow expira- Subject No. TABLE 3 Lu's:G VoLL~!ES, Srno~1ETRY, SPECIFIC Co's:DLCr~'-CE, CuJSI'-G VoLu~rEs, ~:,,;n CLO~!'s;C, C.U,\CITIES 1:--: 23 ME!s AFrER RH:E?s:T A,BISros EXP05CRE 7!:Y :!35-- / F~ FE~ TLC,,red FRC,,red FVC,,red F VC r VC (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) SGaw (liters/sec/cm of H2O/liter) CV/VC (%) CC/TLC (%) od. The Fleisch iated at e facing l I \ notach, er. The I :! meter ich was )etween 1 as that e of the .ty (CC) :ssed as ned ex- ne tests accura- those of !d, each l result. ermined z:er. The 10!. by Og11- rnalyzed ere from \, balloon 1 over a ~J31TC ,'.A) and a ? through \ Jme, and 1per with Normals 100 100 100 >70 >65 I **e 112 81 86 2 ** )!,* 93 70 44 3 Ill 100 115 83 93 4 156 249 100 67 35 1 5 ** ~* 122 83 92 6 98 102 98 80 76 7 105 134 98 92 120 8 139 188 123 70 491 9 107 130 103 73 53 10 88 100 Ill 72 52 II 123 171 122 62 301 12 122 128 136 73 54 13 81 100 79 73 81 14 107 107 120 82 80 15 120 140 114 75 62 16 106 102 121 68 106 17 132 161 107 68 43 18 98 125 120 89 110 19 96 123 98 76 59 20 107 137 114 75 59 21 94 90 93 87 112 22 109 123 115 79 75 23 116 148 118 87 106 Average 107 133 111 77 73 SD 12 37 13 7 26 >o.12r ** >Y 0.127 0.121 ;:-* 0.225 0.177 0. 107 0.191 0.113 0.119 0.210 0.232 0.190 0.205 0.239 0.134 0.208 0.190 0.146 0.248 0.161 0.240 0.180 0.044 Yd N" N N t" N N t t N t t N N N N N ** N t N N N N >,<{/ N N N t N N t t t t t N N N t N ** N t t N N N " Abbreviations u;ed: TLC, total lung capacity; FRC, functional residual capacity; FVC. forced vital capacity; FEV,, forced espired volume in I sec; FEF2,_15""' average expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of the FVC; SGa11', specific conductance of the airways; CVIVC. closing volume per vital capacity; CC/TLC. closing capacity per TLC. 0 Intermountain Thoracic Society, 1975. r Watanabe et al., 1974. d Normal values dependent upon age (Buist and Ross, 1973). "Asterisks(*") indicate study was not completed. f N indicates normal result. "Flows improved at least 25% after administration of aerosolized isoetharine. 1' An arrow (tl indicates elevated closing volume/vital capacity (%) or closing capacity/total lung capacity(%) result. 366 HARLESS, WATANABE, AND RENZETTI tion from TLC. The dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was measured by the method of Mead and Whittenberger (1953). Dynamic compliance was measured at 15 and 60 breaths/min (Cdyn 15 and Cdyn 60 , respectively). The breathing frequencies were maintained voluntarily, being cued by a tape recording or by one of the authors. During the Cdyn maneuvers, the subject was instructed to maintain a constant Time af tidal volume and to keep his FRC level constant. Static expiratory compliance, Cst, Cqst, and Cdyn were each determined after three slow vital capacity breaths. A mean of at least two different measurements for Cst and Cqst and eight breaths for Cdyn was used to express the final result reported. Static expiratory com- Weight FVC (ht F\IC!f-T FEV, (l pliance, Cqst, and Cdyn were expressed in cubic centimeters per centimeter of H2O and Cdyn was also expressed as a percentage of Cst (Cdyn/Cst%). Normal values for Cst and Cdyn used were from Begin et al. (1975). FEV/F FEF2,_,FEF 2,_, TLC (ht TLC/TU RESULTS FRC (lit The results of the initial pulmonary function studies are summarized in Table 3. No man had restrictive chest disease, as determined by FVC, FRC, or TLC, Twelve (50%) had airflow obstruction demonstrated. Most of these men had their FRC!FR SGall (1 CV/\IC CC.TLC ----10.,,1 - aaibrnfloorwmaolbsFtEruFc2t.iHosnC/cd oOcuf mtheenttewdeblvye,twthoroeer mwoerree tneostnss.mAollkebrust aonnde odfidthneoset hhaavdeana PPL1t,002, awti ,2! history of past respiratory symptoms or disease. Two were light smokers, and, "The three were ex-smokers who smoked lightly in the past. Eleven (40%) did not b The manifest airflow obstruction, including five smokers, two ex-smokers, and four 'Res1 nonsmokers. There were no significant differences in the hours of asbestos expo- a Art, sure for those with airflow obstruction (528 348 hr) and those without airflow 'p < obstruction (507 331 hr). Additionally, a dose response could not be demonstrated in those with airflow obstruction. Seven had had heavy, one had moderate, and four had light asbestos exposure. The results of the arterial blood gas analysis before and after exercise, in general, showed the group had normal oxygenation of the arterial blood before and after exercise as well as normal ventilation and pH of the arterial blood. Five, who did not have a history of pulmonary disease, had mild hypoxemia at rest. Two of these had no other documented abnormality, whereas these others had airflow obstruction. Five others had a significant decrease in their arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) after exercise. Of these, three had airflow obstruction and two did not, although the latter two had smoked. Again, a dose-response relationship was not evident. The results of pulmonary function measurements in the 16 subjects who returned for follow-up study were compared to the initial data given in Table 4. These follow-up studies were conducted an average of 196 days (23) after the initial examination. The asbestos exposure for this returning group averaged higher (656 290 hr) than that for the seven who did not return (203 209 hr), and this difference in exposure was significant (P < 0.005). Although the average change in weight between the initial and follow-up observations did not change significantly, three subjects gained more than 3 kg. It may be seen that the results of measurements of the FVC, FEV 1, FEF2515%, Raw, TLC, and PaO2 at rest and after exercise did not change from the first to the second study for the group. Functional residual capacity decreased slightly and SGaw increased slightly for the gr llffie( (P < Tht their the tE al., 1 chani ume. were res pc asbei Th 6. Al for C judg1 subjt smo 1 4.5 I had T 23). wd of rnd 60 \\ere 1hors. I nstant I iance. caths. reaths com'ter of :ormal able 3. TLC. d their had an have a s, and lid not 1d four .; expoairflow e dem:1e had 1 genernd after vho did r)f these Jbstruc1 (Pa02) Jthough ,ident. who reI'able 4. ' 1fter the veraged hr), and average change -:: results rest and 2 group. htly for ACUTE ASBESTOS EXPOSURE AND LUNG FU:\'CTION 367 TABLE 4 RESULTS OF PcLMO:S:ARY Fu:-:c1 ION MEASURt.~!E:>: rs ~T 1.5 ~-..:n 8 Mo-..:THS Fo1,1,o,,1Nc AsllEsros ExrosURE 1:s: 16 MEN" Time after exposure Initial measurement at 1.5 months Weight (kg) FVC (liters)b FVC/FVCp,ect (%) FEV 1 (liters) ,-,,% FEV/FVC (%) FEF2 (LPS) FEF25-w7JFVC (%) TLC (liters)C TLC/TLC pred (%)" FRC (liters)C FRC/FRC pred (%f SGaw (liters/sec/ of H1O/liter) CV/VC (%) CC/TLC(%) PaO2 at rest (mmHg)d PaO2 with exercise (mmHg) 80.3 12.6 5. 19 0.75 110 15 3.95 0.51 75 7 3.64 1.45 70 25 7.16 1.18 107 19 3.59 1.02 135 43 0.1667 0.0624 17.117.26 38.78 8.13 74 8 74 9 a The data are expressed as the mean SD. b The abbreviations are the same as those given in Table 3. 0 Results in 13 men in whom measurements were made. d Arterial oxygen tension . * P < 0.05. Follow-up measurement at 8 months 81.7 13.9 5.24 0. 74 Ill 13 3.95 0.68 75 7 3.42 1.28 66 24 6.76 1.10 106 15 3.140.74 114 27 0.2005 0.0575 21.89 7.96C, 42.25 8.93 75 8 76 9 the group, but neither change was significant. The group's average closing vol- ume did show a significant increase from 17.11% 7.26% to 21.89% 7.96% (P < 0.05). The closing volume data are listed in Table 5 for the 16 returning men during their first and follow-up study. Assuming that there is a 2 to 3% variation during the testing and measuring Ducic et al., 1975; McCarthy et al., 1975; Burki et al., 1975) plus a 0.5% increase due to the older age (about l year) and that larger changes are significant, seven men had significant increases in their closing volume. Of these, six (86%) either were nonsmokers at the time of both studies or were light smokers. Three (Nos. 8, 12, and 14) had gained 4.0, 6.5, and 6.0 kg, respectively. The others had gained 1 kg or less. Again, a dose response to the asbestos exposure could not be demonstrated. The results of the DLCO and lung compliance measurements are listed in Table 6. All values for the DLCO are within the normal range. All men had normal values for Cst. Nine demonstrated frequency dependence of compliance (Table 7), as judged by the results obtained from measurements in normal nonsmoking male subjects of comparable ages (Begin et al., 1975). Four (44%) of these had never smoked and had no prior history of lung disease. One was a smoker but for only 4.5 pack-years, and another was an ex-smoker who had smoked 1 pack-year and had quit 7 years previously. The radiographic examinations were abnormal in four men (Nos. 4, 11, 17 and 23). All were cigarette smokers and one (No. 23) had a history of possible pleural 368 llARLr.SS, \\'ATA'.'IABE, A~D RE.\:Zt.T rI TABLE 5 CL0s1:--G Vou,11: D~n ,,r 1.5 ~,n 8 Mo,rHs FoLL0\11"c Asmsro, ExPo,1RE 1-.; 16 Mr:-- Subject No. I 5 months (CV!VC'7c) 8 months (CV/\IC'.k) Change" (C\IIVC'7c) 10.52 12.50 1.98 2 11.22 8 50 -2.72 3 12 35 27 .so 15.45 4 26.55 27.46 0.91 5 10.86 14.00 3.14 6 4.35 31.60 27.25 7 29.79 15 17 -14.62 8 24.00 25.50 1.50 9 16 55 18.36 1.81 IO 24.32 26.50 2. 18 ii 28.03 38.50 10.47 12 20.77 31.00 I0.23 13 13.81 14.45 0,64 14 11.76 18.74 6.98 15 15.85 20.30 4.45 16 13.06 19.86 6.80 Average 17.11 21.89 I SD 7.26 7.96 " The C\1/C\lo/c measured at 8 months minus that measured at 1.5 months. and/or parenchymal lung disease. The changes observed were costophrenic angle blunting in the absence of pleural effusion (Nos. 4 and 23), lingular scarring (No. 17), and possible increase of the interstitial markings (No. 11). DISCUSSION This study demonstrates a high incidence of airway obstruction in the absence of restrictive defects after an acute 5-month exposure to chrysotile asbestos. The data given in Table 7 show that 17 of 23 men (74%) hc1d airflow obstruction demonstrated at either the initial or follow-up study. All but two of these had their obstruction documented by more than one test. Also documented in Table 7 are the interrelationships among the presence of airway obstruction, the intensity of asbestos exposure, and the incidence of other potential causes of obstruction in this group, namely, cigarette smoking and intrinsic pulmonary disease. In six (35%) of those men with obstruction no possible cause other than asbestos exposure could be identified. Laboratory investigation by Burrows et al. (1977) and clinical observations suggest that less than 20 pack-years of smoking would rarely give rise to airflow obstruction. Using this criterion, 12 (71 %) of the subjects in this study would be left with asbestos exposure as the probable major determinant of their airway obstruction. No obvious correlation exists between the intensity of asbestos exposure and the occurrence of obstruction (Table 7). However, it must be recognized that the estimates of intensity of exposure are very crude. Finally, since the / J :.., / / .::... - / . J / ,,. er er n ::r _ _ _ ,__, _ _..':.:r n, ;:) ,.:.,- i;:; o. ,.,, o _ i:: p:, ,.... C - V, e(1r), '-' (1) -C:: ,;:.:.J.. v, "O - I 5 '< ~ C/"J :;:r '< ('D cr' ('D ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 r::;r er' fl) "'1 0\ .i:,.. 0\ 0 0 0 N - - .i:,.. -....J v.) 0 t.,, I..J ,_. ---:: 5 f er O"' C"t> ..- r.n "' er 0 er ::r "' l o (l) ::j :,:; (l) C/) en ":"1 .,...... ~ (l) i:: (l) (~1) CD '""i CD ::i. :::i 00 o '.t;,.. v. Z.o oo o-, .,. ;...., w :i:,.. -.J :...... oo 00 - ;-" o O'\ N t v. ~:...... \0 - :i:.. v. :....i N Z.o oo I') rm ;:;:i "' 5" Ji; ri" (l) ~ M O p.l ~ (n ~ ::, ~ ~ ::; 0 ~ 0 O n '""i O ,..., ~ i-- ~ z ::, r :=; - ~o ~- (t) v:i :1 ,_. ('l) :~ :S - Cl) 1---< C -J ,_. 0 r:.n ' en ,-._ ~ ~, (l) ('l "" 0. ::::i - >< ::, '<: ;:;- ,-+ >-l ~ ,.... o o -o _, (l) < O 'O "' p:, (l) (JQ t' o - - o ..., - ;:;- o :;;;- f n (;:;l-)(J,Q >,<'<p::, (!r:):r<..-:. en:::i '><:::i,....,(1)...,:::l(l)(l) " > .i f.' f.[.. ". j (, ,< . '> ( .:,\: TABLE 6 . CARRON MoNOXIDL: D1FFU~ING CAPAC! ry AND PuLMo:-.:,1R, CoMPLIA:S:CE ( MEASUREME1'TS IN 16 M1:N WI 1"11 RECE1'T ASBES'I OS EXPOSURE '.",.:, Subject D1.COn D1,CO C.1t Cdy11 10 Cdy11 1;!CH Cdy11.,0 Cdy11,,,/Cs1 n . ),:, ~, :- 'i No. (ml CO/min/mmHg) (% pred) (cc/cm H,O) (cc/cm H,O) (%) (cc/cm H,O) (%) C .., ;;:; ti I 46.2 !38 384.6 227.7 59 214.6 56 ,!:,_,; . 2 40.2 119 263.6 206.9 78 192.0 73 V, ~-,'. 3 37.7 155 295.1 208.4 71 185.2 63 ~ rr: f .. V, 4 40.5 190 237.9 201.9 85 151.3 64 -; 5 45.2 132 344.51, 228.5 66 194.0 56 0 V, 6 36.8 106 337. I b 226.3 67 195.7 58 t"1 7 38.3 106 230.8 167.9 73 133.0 58 X ;,_,; ', ;: 8 36.7 127 340.9 194.8 57 ,r 0 V, 9 48.5 179 234.4 180.8 77 170.9 73 r: :,:: 10 37.1 II 24.8 12 46.7 13 25.9 14 39.8 15 35.4 16 48.4 Average 39.3 SD 6.8 128 358.3 232.4 65 173.4 48 t"1 J:, 84 344.9 258.6 74 202.5 59 ;,.. :,,: t'' 153 312.5 200.2 64 240.8 77 t:: t . 81 178.7 184.8 103 155.0 86 i::: ~' 124 260.3 207.2 80 150.9 58 :,,: l:. 123 315.9 189.8 60 194.5 62 (") 2 r/ 176 234.8 239.8 102 189.8 81 133 292.1 31 55.6 209.8 23.4 :,,: 74 186.9 64 n -I II 30.2 10 0 z " Abbreviations used: D1,CO. diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide; Cst, static pulmonary compliance: Cdyn ,;, pulmonary compliance at 15 breaths/ min: Cd_\'llr;o, pulmonary compliance at 60 breaths/min. 1' Inadequate tracing to measure C:,t and Cqsl is reported. An dSteri,k ( i indicates inadequate tracing to measure result~. ttf w 0\ \0 ~~ ' !, c r f ,1 ......,'-..... , .. -- . ~. I l TABLE 7 AIRFLOW OBSTRUCTION IN RELATION TO SMOKING HISTORY, PULMONARY DISEASE, AND INTENSITY OF ASBESTOS EXPOSURE IN 23 MEN Smoking history (pack-years) Active lung disease Exposure history FEV 1/FVC% FEF2,_1,JFVC% CV!VC% Cdyn. Hypoxemia I 0 2 0 3 0 4 8 5 0 6 4 7 0 8 22 9 0 IO 37 II 37 12 Ex-sm'; IO 13 Ex-sm; 5 14 Ex-sm; I 15 0 16 Ex-sm; 6 17 17 18 10 19 IO 20 Ex-sm; 2 21 10 22 0 23 4 - Hn Asthma H - H M - H - M - L Bronchitis H - H Bronchitis H Bronchitis H - H - H - L - H H - L M Bronchitis L - L M - L - M N(N)r N(N) N(N) Wl N(N) N(N) N(N) N(N) N(N) N(N) W) N(N) N(N) N(N) N(N) N(N) t N N N N N N N(N) tb(t) N(N) Wl N(N) N(N) N(N) Wl Wl Wl tW W> N(N) N(N) Wl N(N) t N t i N N N N(N) N(N) N(tb) j(t) N(N) N(t) j(N) j(j) N(N) j(j) t(i) N(t) N(N) N(j) N(N) N(N) * N 1' N N N N +d - - - ++" - + ++ + ++ + ++ + ++ + - + ++ - - - + - + ++ - * ++ * ++ * - * ++ * - * - * Airflow obstruct10n Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No No " Abbreviations used: H, heavy asbestos exposure, M, moderate; L, light. "Abbreviations used: N, normal result; j and i, indicate results diagnostic of airflow obstruction. r The parentheses contain results of the follow-up study in the 16 returning men. "A plus(+) indicates frequency dependence of pulmonary compliance was documented. " Two pluses ( + +) indicate that PaO2 was abnormal at rest or fell below 5 mmHg after exercise. 1 Ex-sm, ex-smoker. An asterisk(*) indicates study not completed. ~s~[-'t-[i ~0....., e:.,::, c:r::, r.r,' "'1 0 - ;:r n..... o- ; ;(tii .(-JQ, oOp(;ti ::j (JO C: ~~2.~:;. :I: C ~ o ~ 4 V'l ('t)......., :::I c,, e:.. - <" ~ ~ ~ ::I~ :::i--, r. ....... 5! e; e; 3 ~ ;,;-o-g;.., 8--o ;.c.no.~~~ .... 0 ~ ~ ,..., C/l ::, ::r C: 0 r.r,_O"' (1) () ,... ,..., (t) 0. 0. :-:s(~t) .,,., (1) ::r 0. (/) C: ::r (1) ro O F. ~- Q 8' ::;. o. o. "'C:(t)o..,:ego ro ~ (t) - (/) :2(1).a~ er 1-1'-:i ,..:...r.r.in :::r-ro~ n v:. (/) .., O~ ~ (t) X '"O::i(t)::,(1)'"0- ,(-/)+ :-:i :(D:i 0 O'Ci 0 - < 8' ::r O~" ::, ::., ii, - - 0 ,... (/) .., ~ ::, ::, 3 0. 0 ii, ~(t.,""'t ................... ~ ~ -~- (/) (~1> 2- ... :-:, -(1) :l. ii, ::: ::, ;:: "' 0 ::r -c - < il' <-c 0 :-:, < .I<-:c:: :.o.:,r o :i:i,, ..,:=i ':7 ::, o o - ii, O" ;:,. - ii, ......, ::, ::, 0 il' rn '"O -, O C. 0 ::, 0 (JO ::T""'..,(1)~'< onrnro(1),... ::r ~ O ~ -, (IQ. 1;; ,... O"' ~(1) (/) ii, C: ~ ,,....._ 't::' I ::::. (1) :'.::. ~ ii, (1) .., ::, 00 C f l l ~ ~ - ifJ ~ 0 (1) -, '"O 3~roo ~ 0 n S ~n " 0 ~~ :::r' ~ (ti r -:i o n ~<n en 5 ~ o . e . r ;;; (1) ~ ::::; ;:s '< ~ ri; ~ (JQ 5; 5," ccrro:::,-,--., ~:=.~ro,... Q. Vl 'C) Vl 'C) o c-l::;:C:c - ::, _, "7 i;:iJ, ii, ::, ..., (1) :-:i ~ ~ : : : : : n 3 0 -.. '"tj(D("D::, :::~ru"' ::,~ - - ...., ...., ~...., ~ ~ ,_. 1./l ~ - :::,- v, ::, rt> (D C ~ ,_., ,-, \C:(JC-: (1 - ::; fi" w ft1 -...J 0 fti!,:, t~- ! 1 ::::: > ;,;: t,., r' tTl (/) :!' ..... >.<..., r .> '..<'. > t,: tTl r z t:i f ;,;: tTl % ~:;:'. N ,t.T.,l t, j i:'_'. ii" f:. [Ii'_? 1( f I: \.'' ~ , J~ ) ~j }'~ \ - _ It !fc ' ACUTE ASBESTOS EXPOSURE A!\'D LUNG FUXCfION 371 pulmonary function test abnormalities observed most commonly were in the mea- surements of the FEF2:,... 75'7n closing volume, and frequency dependence of com- pliance, it seems likely that the site of airflow obstruction in this group is in the small peripheral airways. I The finding of airflow obstruction is consistent with other published data. Jodoin et al. (1971) reported on the early effects of asbestos exposure on lung function and state that their findings support the possibility that asbestos dust is another cause of obstructive disease of the small airways. Becklake et al. (1976), in reviewing the published pulmonary function data obtained during the evaluation of patients with asbestosis, have suggested airflow obstruction may occur in some cases. Decreased airway conductance has been documented by Ostrow and Cher- niack (1973) in interstitial lung diseases of other etiologies. Hourihane and Mccaughey (1966) reported that the basic lesion in asbestosis is a peribronchial \ fibrosis which obliterates surrounding alveoli. These clinical and pathological data can be correlated with the findings of Peress et al. (1976), suggesting that chrysotile asbestos dust, representative of environmental dust, had the small air- ways as one of the target sites as based upon closing volume data. Although other investigators (Murphy et al., 1972) have shown in a study population of shipyard workers exposed to low concentrations of asbestos fiber that airflow obstruction was no more common than a matched control population, it is not clear what a higher dose would do. Of the 10 men who had either arterial hypoxemia at rest or an exercise-induced fall in arterial PaO2, all but one had airflow obstruction. Furthermore, the DLCO was normal in all subjects in whom it was measured. Thus, there is no evidence that a defect in alveolar capillary gas diffusion played a role in the gas exchange abnormalities observed. The absence of any evidence of a restrictive defect in this group of subjects is not surprising when one considers the short interval between exposure and study. Such defects occur when there is pathologic and/or radiologic evidence of fibrosis. The few radiographic abnormalities noted in this study could not be related to the asbestos exposure. -s ~ Since the exposure encountered by these men probably exceeded OSHA stan- u Q. dard, we cannot predict the effects of an acute exposure that is less than the E 0 standard level. The OSHA standard is, however, intended as a protection against u 0 asbestosis and not necessarily malignancy. We would expect that thest mt-n may t: >, risk development of neoplastic disease in the future. We conclude that acute I",:;) 2 exposure to chrysotile asbestos dust causes airflow obstruction as early as 1.5 "' "' months after exposure. =a .f- 1 ' ~-t.i _,.-',. ;:r:,, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ' ~:- .:,: "' The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dr. John Armstrong, M.D., Associate Professor of ~:,;7;::_ u Radiology, University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah for interpreting the chest J", radiographs; Alan G. Barbour, M.D., Bureau of Disease Prevention, Utah State Division of Health for i::: <( his referral of the workers studied; Mr. Jeff Throckmorton, Public Health Engineer, Utah State Division of Health for conducting the air sampling at the construction site; Ms. Angela Devito for her technical assistance; and Ms. Barbara Parker and Ms. Polly Detton for typing the manuscript. l "----,-- --- ,._ ---- .,_, ___,",,,:,,..;-..:,;,,)$*"'ilia--,,,~.....--~~.... -"* ., _..,~- . " " " ' = - ~ ~. . . :...~a.....--.,.w..._.-.t.:.:.:.-a-s,,,......;:-?~~;;;..~~~~"';;~-- l I 372 HARLE'SS, \\'ATA:\'ABE, A:\'D RE:\'ZETTI REFERENCES Becklake. M. R. (1976). Asbestos-related diseases of the lung and other organs: Their epidemiology and implications for clinical practice. Amer. Rn. Resp. Dis. 114, 187-227. Begin, R., Renzetti, A. D., Jr., Bigler, A.H., and Watanabe, S. (1975). Flow and age dependence of ai1,vay closure and dynamic compliance. J. Appl. Physiol. 38, 199-207. Buist, A. S., and Ross, B. B. (1973). Predicted values for closing volumes using a modified single I breath nitrogen test. Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis. 107, 744- 752. Burki, N. K., Barker, D. B., and Nicholsen, D. P. (1975). Variability of the closing volume measurement in normal subjects. Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis. 112, 209-212. Burrows, B., Knudson, R. J., Cline, M. G., and Lebowitz, M. D. (1977). Quantitative relationships between cigarette smoking and vent1latory function. Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis. 115, 195-205. Dubois, A. B., Botelho, S. Y., Bedell, G. N., Mar,hall, R., and Comroe, J. H., Jr. (1956a). A rapid plethysmographic method for measuring thoracic gas volume: A comparison with the nitrogen washout method for measuring functional residual capacity in normal subjects. J. C/in. Invest. 35, \ 322-326. Dubois, A. B., Botelho, S. Y., and Comroe, J. H., Jr. (1956b). A new method for measuring airway resistance in man using a body plethysmograph: Values in normal subjects and in patients with respiratory disease. J. Clin. !nl'est. 35, 327-335. Ducic, S., Swift, J., Martin, R. R., and Macklem, P. T. (1975). Appraisal of a new test: Betweentechnician variation in the closing volume. Amer. Rei. Resp. Dis. 112, 621-626. Fournier-Massey, G., and Becklake, M. R. (1975). Pulmonary function profiles in Quebec asbestos workers. Bull. Physiopatho!. Respir. (Nancy) 11, 429-445. Hourihane, D. O'B., and McCaughey, W. T. E. (1966). Pathological aspects of asbestosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 42, 613-622. Intermountain Thoracic Society. (1975). "Pulmonary Function Standardization Task Force Clinical Pulmonary Function Testing: A Manual of Uniform Laboratory Procedures for the Intermountain Area. (R.E. Kanner and A.H. Morris, Eds.), Intermountain Thoracic Society, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jodoin, G., Gibbs, G. W., Macklem, P. T., McDonald, J.C., and Becklake, M. R. (1971). Early effects of asbestos exposure on lung function. Amer. Rev. Re5p. Dis. 104, 525-535. McCarthy, D. S., Craig, D. B., and Cherniack, R. M. (1975). lntraindividual variability in maximal expiratory flow-volume and closing volume in asymptomatic subjects. Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis. 112, 407-411. Mead, J., and Whittenberger, J. L. (1953). Physical properties of the human lungs measured during spontaneous respiration. J. Appl. Physio/. 5, 779- 796. Milic-Emili, J., Mead, J., Turner, J.M., and Glauser, E. M. (1964). Improved technique for estimating pleural pressure from esophageal balloons. J. Appl. Physiol, 19, 207-211. Murphy, R. L. H., Jr., Gaensler, E. A., Redding, R. A., Belleau, R., Keelan, P. J., Smith,.\. A., Goff, A. M., and Ferris, B. G. (1972). Low exposure to asbestos; Gas exchange in ship pipe coverers .and controls. Arch. E111iro11. Health 25, 253-264. Ogilvie, C. M., Forster, R. E., Blakemore, W. S., and Morton, J. W. (1957). A standardized breath holding technique for the clinical measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. J. Clin. Invest. 36, 1-17. Ostrow, D., and Cherniack, R. M. (1973). Resistance to airflow in patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease. Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis. 108, 205-210. Peress, L., Hoag, H., White, F., and Becklake, M.R. (1976). The relationship between closing volume, smoking, and asbestos dust exposure. Clin. Res. 23, 647A. Schmidt, A. M., and Cohn, J.E. (1961). Modified body plethysmograph for study of cardiopulmonary physiology. J. Appl. Physio/. 16, 935-937. Turner, J.M., Mead, J,, and Wohl, M. E. (1968). Elasticity of human lungs in relation to age.I. Appl. Physio/. 25, 664-671. U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1972). 29CFR 1910.93a. Permissible exposure to airborne concentrations of asbestos fibers. Fed. Reg. 37, I 10. Watanabe, S., Renzetti, A. D., Jr., Begin, R., and Bigler, A. H. (1974). Airway responsiveness to a bronchodilator aerosol. Amer. Rev. Resp. Dis. 109, 530-537.