Document bB3XpGq63YBK00aRk1nOpLpe3

DownloadRandom document
ACUTE TOXICITY TO AQUATIC INVERTABRATES (DAPHNIA MAGNA) TEST SUBSTANCE Identity:Perfluorooctanoiaccid,ammonium salt;may also be referredto as PFOA ammonium salt,Ammonium perfluorooctanoateP,FO, FC116,FC-126,FC-169,orFC-143. (Octanoicacid,pentadecafluoro,ammonium salt,CAS # 3825-26-1) Remarks: The 3M productlotnumber was 37. The testsample is@C-143. It'psuritywas notsufficientclhyaractedzed,though currentinformation indicatesitisa mixtureof96.5 - 100% testsubstance and 0 - 3.5% C6, C7, and Cg pertluoroanalogue compounds. The followingisan abbreviated summary of several previously completed Daphnia magna studies conducted to evaluate diet These studies have been superceded by a more recent test. METHOD: Method: Not noted. Type: Staticacute GLP: No Year completed:1982 Species: Daphnia magna Supplier:USEPA-ERL, Duluth,MN. Analyticalmonitoring:Temperature,pH and dissolvedoxygen Exposure period:48-hours Test organism age: First-Instyaorung (0.5-1.m5m) Pretreatment:Not noted. Dilutionwater:Carbon-filterweedllwater. Stock and testsolutionpreparation:Test solutionwsere createdby a common stocksolution5, g/L Concentrations dosing rate:Once Stabilityofthe testchemical solutions:Not noted Exposure vessels: 250 mL glassbeakers containing200 mL testsolution(6 cm depth). Number of replicatest:wo Number of daphnids per replicate:10 - 20 Number of concentrations:fiveplusa blankcontrol RESULTS Element values: 48-hourEC5o = 126 (86-183)mg/L to >1000 mg/L Element valuesbased on nominal concentrations CONCLUSIONS The testsample resultsfor48-hour EC50 forDaphnia magna were inconsistent.Values generated inMay of1982 determined 48-hour EC50s to be >1000 mg/L. The value generateinJune of 1982 indicateda 48-hour EC50 of 126 mg/L witha 95% confidenceIntervaolf 86 to 183 mg/L. These inconsistenciesmay be due to differencesindiet. Submifter: 3M Company, EnvironmentalLaboratory,P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul,Minnesota,55133 DATA QUALITY ReliabilityK:limischranking3. The method isnot described,sample purity was not propedy characterizeadnd itlacksanalyticaclonfirmatioonf test substance concentrations.The valuesfrom multipletestscontradicetach other.The purpose ofthese studieswas toevaluatedifferendtaphnid diets. REFERENCES These studieswere conducted by the 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory,St.Paul,MN, completed from May toJune, 1982. OTHER Last changed: 5/25/00 Tyre Test ENVIRO@JME"JTA.'. LA;-TORTORY AQIJATTC TOXICITF DATA StrEET 46.- -rc ro Mater-al Tested Lot 7- Test Or,-an-ism L7. indq im9t Source. -Otj/uii a(- at- Rer'diL&yJit-.-(p*atch Nn. Age: First-Instar yo@ng (0?5-1.Srm) No. (-,rgpnismsrer treatment _20 Test Chamber: 250ml glass beaker Test Solution Vol.: 200ml Test Solution Depth: 6cm. Time SttLrt,-d10:W. forrV+Date Started Date Completed Dilution Wrter- Carbon-filteredwell water (Temg.-LIL12c, D.O.----2-PMI PH----) Investigatc,rO.U. i (Full Signature) -- (95% Confideice limits) 0 t4 Init: nk Cone 0. Total t 24 Hours 48 Hours urs gwit- Hfto Anoun Total .0. Total D.Om* TiytiI otal No. Dead PH ID Added PPM I I No.Dead pH Ipp No.Dead LH P. rTNo.De ad pr Control I 0 c> gt., B.L2 led 'Lo ,.,@a c> .- @ z- e> c> Test Temp. 0C. 2.y0 Date Commen ts: -&AMA:& 5:@ qLA@@ Effects other than Mortality qv EC so @02Y 4& ay j6ST!l-tVegsi 4w/ Tank No. Control _@ymptoms or Reactions 24-Hr. Total No. Affected 48 Hr. 72-Hr. 96-Hr. ENVIRO@4MENJTAA'. LA;-IORTORY AQUATTC TOXICITT DATA SF:EET Tyre Test it8 At--ECg:6 Material Testedlr- Lot _3*1 a@ Ckl@ Test C)roanism 17. "40L.4 "CL Source 'OU r)at-!Rec-'dia@l&atch No. v Age: First-Instar young (0.5-1.Svm) No. ("Irganismrser treatment to Test Chamber: 2SDml glass beaker Test Solution Vol.: 200ml Test Sol.ution Depth: 6cm. Time Stirted 1:W,4 Date Started SlfZZ2- Date Completed.C/(o./tZ, Dilution Wrter Carhon-filtered well water (Temo. OC, D.O.@@@m, pH___) InvestiRatcr A-PL04-&,, (Pull Signature) A Init: ank Conc mit/I Totalt Anotm Added 2-4 Total No. Dead urs D.O. pH ippm LC (95% Confiderice Limits) so 48 Hours Total D.O. No.Dead PH IPPM ;oy 43-Hours Tot.al (3. 1iTc;)":'tpy'Oa'in?'s No Dead PH ;;mllNo.DeadiH Control 30 3- Leo A?6 (>/a 1 (Plttv */to wo YIV 0/". si . ei Yld Y/O c -7 c 3/ifr" BL yio tci-Y,o 11 I Y16 0 Test Temp. aye, Date IIAAlyz Comments: fl%. el1( QA&AV Effects other than Mortality Ec so -I vple 4.r5H Tank No. Control -@ymptoms or Reactions 24-Hr. Total No. Affected 48 Hr. 72-Hr. 2.,dLf 6J-p2- 96-Hr. ENVIRO@4ME"JTAYS. LA;-KORTORY AQLIATIC TOXICITT DATA SI:EET Tyre Test Material Tested ir'c1-11-5 Lot.-37 Test Or-anism Source Dat@% Recld L;LWgatch No. Age: First-Instar young (0,5-1.Svm) No. CTganisms rer treatment 2 6 Test Chamber: 250ml glass beake-r Test Solution Vol .: 200ml Test Solution Depth: 6cm. Timt-St irts-d If:50 Ag Date Started -Date Comnleted Dilution Wrter Carbon-filtered well water (Temn._Lsif. OC, D.O.@@pm, PH---) Investigatc (Full Signaturoq LC (95% ConfideTice limits) so Init. ank Conc. mg/l Control io Ioo .roo 5' /ow Tota Amount Added 2,0 loo 24 Total No. Dead ours D. PH ppo-I I 48 Hours 72 Hours Total D.oolif:ti 0 No.Dead pH IPP m No.Dead pH F;P; 0 a 1 Hou7s Toottaal oNroD.Dead )H 17 t Test T!m. OC* oi/iy- - TOL -ale, 4 Date Comments: Effects other than Mortality Tank 1- No. Control -Symptoms or Reactions 24-Hr. EC so Total No. Affected 48 Hr. -94-Hr. &MHr. 5 ri E.Ci5 I (IC,r 2 C,@ 1 C'.0r,lt,lEr-iFTG*P,---. 4 .7 24 HR PON P LOG Ot I ri 5 F, 1 ClClft 2 2. E.9'i---.97 FRRCTION F,E P 0 t-liiI t-f4. 0 0.05 0.25 0.85 FITTED F F-'RFI- I Dr-1 5. 72675**@E- (17 0. C,1709,'@25 0.4217381 0 . 7'-z5,5 1 4,@@ r'4D OF ITERRTIDN*---'. INTERCEPT 7 HETEROGENIETY -7.'612345 FACTOR (H) LC-50 @q-@tPCT. LOWER CONF. LIMIT = '@5 PC'T. LIPPEF' C'.Fit-iLFI.MIT = L0PE (E) 2..747:,308 t-40. OF C.Ot-iC..FOR CLIF"@EE5 IT!PUT DATFi-C-Ot-iC.@t-iD. I Ci!2. Ci!2. 20, (IC,9 2 0 @ Cf FDtqt,iENTS FOR C-LIF@%@'5E 46 HR RU@l B LOC, 1 Cl I cici C, CHI-SO 1 2. 2.69-S-97 PROBABILITY < 0.05 FRRC-TION F,E, :-P@:0 t-iriI t--i 0.1 0.3 1 CHI SC, FOR LINEARITY 5.Ci54567 C, CHI FOR PROBRI-, I L.I TY ---0.07987569 404.5214 861.965S FITTETI FF@F-tC.TIDr-i 0-ilSS87939 (1:5 097ESP 0. 898752*---.' r-iD OF ITERATIONS 114TERCEPT (A) ,SLOPE C@H I SID-FDR L INEAR I.TY C H I Ci FOF' -PROBFIBILITY -3.552151 1.78872.21 7.774071 0. 0(1530C'149 HETEF-,OC,ENTETI( F-FiC:TDF- (.H*,i C-.774(!71 @Ir-iC.E C, f--,F--EFi7EFT'HF-f-i l@ THE G LTPil!7*,--H.@F;.Etic-T I,EF I t-4ED Lf--:-5f=l *-;p@-,. @@ @-i19 a F-'(-T-. LOi,,i'EF-'CEr-4F. LIMIT = F-C:T . L,F'FE, F, C:Eit-Fi-. L I t-IIT = C, j F -CFi- E;I ElF-4:: F-i'-f11F,T F-i El.r-CL,F;%,.,E@ 5 E!F FDF;. CL,F-.-@,,1'E 4 I DH- TH@-C Eir-i@ t-iE,. li I ri..2 C, ri 11EF-ir., 5Ciri,2(1.4 1 C,0Cl2.-C9i1 @r_,4HF, C:D t-fi--- F--.LitH-i I LOC- CDt-4C I oci 50(1 100(1 C:HI-SO 2 2.69897 3 PROBABILITtf: < 0.05 F F-F,i.C,T 10 ti FESpot4II ING fl.05 Oi 2 0.85 F I TTEli FFF;C T IDr4 2. 175 tL@E-F'7 :-'03.959862 0.7177021 % @c4: -c, Lit-iliEF:FLDtRkTi LINE r-i952C,OF @iFiI r4 P F-0- G P F-r4-1 t.@o OF I T E F"FiT 10 t-1 It-iTEF-CEFT k.R.@ LDP E fB) CHI FOR LINERFITY CHI :S.CiFOR P R D P f;1;1 L I T Y 7. HETtF-.DGEt-4 I ETY FFiCiTOF-- fk" @-.4-c@9-t-44 G 5.140073 G i--,F;EF-i-rEFT-HPT-@ 19 THF C:Elr-,F.L Ir,!IT@ F4F-E t4-0.T I,EF ItiED P C T. LDt,iF-FC,-Ot-iF.LIriIT = PC:* T. LIPPER C,.Dt-iF.LIr-!!T = HO. OF COt-iC,.FOR INF;LIT DRTFi-C-ONC.@ 1092092 IOOP20!,6 50CIP 20P 20 CLIR@.,E2 3 NO. EXPDS Eli - t4Ej.EtERli C.Orlt-IENTS FOR CURVE 2 48 HF' RUN Fi C Dt-ii-- LDG C.Ot-iC-. f.Fii F-.HI-,:0-: FPDBRE! 2 IL I T@-(;<. 0. Ct5 F F-.'FC,I.OTN F,E *-P-,0: t-D4 I t-,f--- 0.1 ci. FIITED FRFIC@T I Dt-i ri t-iD OF I TEF;,@iTI Cit-I I r-iTEF,C.EF-,T k R*'- i 5 15 1 H E.T E F-D -iCE C IF -,v -tl'F (H-, -t LDPE (p," CH I F EiR L'I t-E4 F-F4--I T Y 1 7. 774 C'7 1;@ 7.774fli-,l G 'rHE COt-ii:. L It-IIT'--,F4 E CHI FDR, PROFFIBILITY (I.Cii.1- CiCi1 4@--@ I F'F'DE.I T FEIF;- E:I D CiFCF COt FEIF-.- 1 (1,4 CI!4, I ijCi!.4 Ci@ I 5C)O@ 4CIg 4(1 CDr-ir,iEr@T FOR !--'FL-i@,i@E I CotipIriED 4'-:H.F'.'PUt-iR&B LOG c 0 ri 1 5 Cici CHI-SO 2 2. 6':-@S97 PF'OPREILIT"f@ < 0.05 liC-T F-t FRRC.T I Ot-4 RESPONDING 0.1 0.3 1 FITTED FR.FIC.TIOti 0.0388795 0. 5097669 0.8987511 r-(i-j0 i= ITER-H@TIOti-7 INTERCEPT 3. -r1_5, @4ETEF@DF--Et4l P-T'-r r-PCTDF-- ik"@, :7*11-iCE"f---i C-F@ER.TEF-.- TH,-t-@ L 0PE J"E: CHI '-@O FOR LINERPITY C-H I SO FOR PROBF-FP I L I T-f' 1.78',-,32 1!!@.54,'i,C,i9 S. (1451 @:'7E-C,5 15.54,=,,Ci,; G = SE;82.549 TI-E C:Cit-ir.LIrfiI-i,7F-4F--tE-iDT E,EFIt-ipIj '7r4-, r-17-T. LCjkkF-F-. Lltii-T = ';5 PC.T. LIPPEF., C.Ot-4F-. LIr-ill= USED PROBIT ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR CALCULATING EC VALUES Version 1.4 FC-143 Da.ohnia maona acute static 48-nrs exoosure Conc. Number Exoosed Number Reso. Observed Proportion Responding Adjusted Prooortion Responding 10.()0()0 40 100.0000 40 500.0000 42 1000.0000 40 4 0.1000 12 0.3000 42 1.0000 40 1.0000 0.1000 0.3000 1.0000 1.0000 Predicted Proportion Responding 0.0306 0.5327 0.9262 0.9792 Chi - Square Heterooeneitv 19.408 WARNING Sionificant h6terooeneitv e@fists. The results reoorted +or this data set mav not be valid. The results should be interoreted with apprODriate caution. NOTE Slooe not sioni+icantly different from zero. EC fiducial limits cannot be comouted. ML( Sigma 1.959058 0.511587 Parameter Estimate Std. Err. 95% Confidence Limits ------------------------------------------------------------------- Interceot SloDe 1.172584 1.9547oO 1.712521 o.77@,:.273 -6.196393, -1.368389, 8.541559) 5.2777E39) Theoretical Spontaneous Response Rate O.C)OOO BURLINGTON RESEARCH. INC@. TRIMMED SPEARMAN-KARBER METHOD.FOR CALCULATION OF ECSO AND LC50 VALUES IN BIOASSAYS FOR REFERENCE. CITE M.A. HAMILTON, R.C. RUSSO, AND R.V. THURSTON, TRIMMED SPEARMAN-KARBER METHOD FOR ESTIMATING LETHAL CONCENTRATIONS IN TOXICITY BIOASSAYS. ENVIRON. SCI. TECHNOL. 11(7) /@14-719 .CORRECTION 12(4) 417 (1978). 1977. MEDIAN DATE 5/31/82 TEST 1 .CHEMICAL FC-143 SPECIES DaDhnia magna DURATION 48 holtrs RAW DATA CONCENTRATION(ma/L) 10.00 100.00 500.00 1000.00 NUMBER EXPOSED MORTALITIES 4t) 40 42 4C) 4 12 42 40 SPEARMAN-i,:ARBER TRIM 10.00 SPEARMAN-KARBER ESTIMATES eC50 125.7965775 95% LOWER CONFIDENCE 86.29 95% UPPER CONFIDENCE lB3.39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8URLINGTON RESEARCH. INC. Trimmed SDearman-Karber Method for Calculation of EC50 and LC50 Values in Bioassavs 6.907E x 3 .3 3 x 6.044E .3 .3 .3 5.IBOE L .3 N 3 .3 x 0 4.317E N .3 c 3 E 3 N 3 T :7,4.5::,E R .3 A. .3 T .3 2.590E N 3 x .3 .3 1.726E 3 3 .3 .3 .867.4E .3 3 3 3 ODDDDDEDDDDDDDDEDVDDDDDDDDDDDDEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDE LCIO LC25 LC50 LC75 LCLOO MORTALITIES FC- 143 Da.ohnia magna acute static 48-hrs exoosltre PLOT OF ADJUSTED PROBITS AND PREDICTED REGRESSION LINE Probit 10+ a C) 9+ E3+ 7+ .5+ ... 0 4+ 3+ 1+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ECOL EC10 EC25 EC50 EC75 EC@?0 EC99 FC-143 Daphnia maana acute static 49-hrs eXDosLtre Estimated EC Values and Confidence Limits Point Conc. Lower Up.oer 95% Confidence Limits EC 1.00 EC.5.00 ECIO.00 EC15.00 EC50.00 EC85.00 EC90.00 EC95.00 EC99.00 5.8607 13.0782 20.0635 26.7824 90.7942 307.7991 410.8741 630.3306 1406.5795