Document b5MDRprON1JNLGdggwDQr9qQ0

ILeaiidl toccEliiiisltipficB FE L IX EDGAR W O R M S E P ,pr e s id e M . C . 6 R O W N E L L ,ViCC P R E S fO C N t J . A . M A R T I N O . V i c c PftEStOENT R O B E R T LINOLEY H E G rE L O . SECRETARV-TREASORER 4 2 0 LEXINGTON AVENUE NEW YORK 17,3S'.Y. MANFRED BOWDITCH D IRECTO R O F HEALTH AND SAFETY August 28, 18cl Robert A. Kehoe, H. D., Director __ Kettering Laboratory or Applied Physiology University of Cincinnati College of Iledicine-Eden Avenue Cincinnati 19, Ohio Dear Bob': Than:.: you for your letter or August 2 0 lh vith regard tc the patch testing program; i be In _ understand and commend your desire and neec vc o.eie- gate. I non have iron Eagle-Piemen the m i c r e l a tion you -ranted on tneir oasic jiiiuci.-t> a.m. sending you herewith a copy of _their l e t t e r _ana en closure on this subject, until i nave neara iron Dr. Susieind that he is bach on the joe, 1 tahe the liberty of transmitting such material through your office. ' Sincerely yours. KB/ ad end. 2U & / i~ r? & > ****"* ^ a tr r * * 9/fd S& j K B G0C5386 EAGLE-PICHER ' AMERICAN BUILDING CINCINNATI 1, OHIO Mw m < & ' '*JP dE*' P -> August 21, 1951 Mr. Manfred Bowditch Director of Health & Safety Lead Industries Association 420 Lexington Avenue* New York 17, N. Y. ' VIVV:'. . -} VV-iVVVV r " :; dfV Dear Mr. Bowditch: c o p y ;., ,. - - -..... r. A^,?4.a exlce o x ,m r - Roller, I am answering your letter of regarding the sample of Basic. Silicate of White " i ^ S 1 vV? su^ t t e d for transmittal to Dr. Basic Silicate -"/hite Lead has the following Kehoe. Oui composition: 2PbSi0s. PbO. H20 Total Pb as PbO Si as SiO Combined Ego Moisture ~ 78.85f0 ") r-T p , *~rf<i -i-O . b O y b KO.1 v/hen added^ to o_ ^i,ne resin a compound, it content. .Maoori--ee d is used. erailed --in varying percentages information can be ob- t a m e d from a brochure on Basic S-n-fo^+A tI T T issued -o:- the Bakelite C o r p ^ i o ^ ^ f & ^ h attached. <e hope unat we iiave answered vnur inrm'T>v -u,,+. -> need additional i n f o r m a t i o n ^ 1^ ? tact us. , 0PH:alf end. Yours truly, THE EAGLE-PICHER SALES COMPANY 0. P. fense - Sales Manager 03C5387 W: `iMll:':V Tv F E L I X ED GA R W O R M SER .M tcsiO KN T K . c . B R O W N C L L .V ie c M C StO C N T J. A . M A R T I N O . V ic e M C SID C M T ROBERT U N O tE Y Z lC C rc L B . SC C A E T A R T >T C A A i/A C ft 4 - 2 0 LEXINGTON AVENUE NEW YORK 17. N. Y. MANFRED BOWDITCH D IR EC TO R O P HEALTH AND SA PETV August 16, 1951 Robert A. Kehoe, 11. D., Director Kettering Laboratory of Applied Physiology University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Eden Avenue Cincinnati 19, Ohio Dear Bob: This is in answer to your letter of August 9th with regard to the patch testing progran. The two copies of the agreement have been completed here and are returned herewith; please have one copy processed at your end and returned to us In turn, we are a bit confused by your comments on the six samples of lead stabilizers 'which we sent you. You say that you have the needed information on three of the National Lead samples, but you make no mention of the fourth, the normal salycilate (Dutch Boy Hormasal), on which you also have full information. They you speak of "the white lead and dry carbonate" as if two substances were involved here. The basic carbonate which we sent came from MacGregor and we will secure the desired information for you for them. The basic silicate sent is not the same as R a t i o n a l e Tribase E and we will here also" have t.o get the information for you from Eagle-Picher. Finally, this investigation has to do solely with lead compounds used as stabilizers in the formulation of vinyl plastics, and the use of any such compounds in paints is in no way involved. According to my notes on our conference with Dr. Suskind on March 28th, the six stabilizer compounds Robert A. Kehoe, M. D. Page 2 Au gu st 16, 1951 as supplied by us were to be incorporated in a bland vehicle and tested for both primary irritation and sensitisation. This was to be on 200 subjects if necessary, at a maximum cost to us of f2,70Q, but on fewer subjects and with a corres ponding reduction in cost if positive findings occurred with a lesser number of subjects. Please set me straight on this if I hav e n 't got it right. Sincerely yours, 33/ad end. - 2 GQG5389