Document b5Gnv7xE6m9oG9kB54bMN3jw6

Original article Scand J Work Environ Health 2004;30(1):64-70 Cancer mortality and morbidity among Lithuanian asbestos-cement producing workers by Giedre Smailyte, MSc, Juozas Kurtinaitis, PhD,1 Aage Andersen2 Smailyte G, Kurtinaitis J, Andersen A. Cancer mortality and morbidity among Lithuanian asbestos-cement producing workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004:30(1):64--70. Objectives This study investigated the incidence of cancer and cause-specific mortality among workers in the two Lithuanian asbestos-cement factories. Methods The study included 1887 asbestos-cement workers, 1285 men and 602 women, and 37 000 person- years. The two factories were active from 1956 (A) and 1963 (B), and the workers were observed from 1978 to 2000. The analysis was based on a comparison between the observed and expected numbers of cancer and causes of death. The observed numbers of cancer were obtained through linkage with the national cancer registry. The date and causes of death were obtained from two different sources. The expected numbers were calculated on the basis of gender- and age-specific incidence and mortality rates in 5-year periods from the whole country. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Duration of employment and time since first exposure were used as indicators of exposure. Results During the follow-up, 1978-2000, 473 deaths were observed versus 489 expected. There was no excess risk of deaths from nonmalignant respiratory diseases, except for an elevated risk of mortality in relation to the digestive organs other than cancer, 18 observed versus 12.2 expected (95% CI 0.9-2.3). There was no excess risk for any types of cancer, except for colorectal cancer in men, 17 observed cases (SIR 1.6, 95% CI 1.6-2.6) and one case of mesothelioma in a woman. Conclusions This study on asbestos-exposed workers did not show any excess risk of respiratory cancer or deaths of pneumoconiosis. Key terms asbestos-cement workers, cancer incidence, chrysotile, mortality. The potential ill-health effects of exposure to asbestos have been recognized for many years, and irrefutable evidence is found for human cancer of the lung and pleu ra (1-3). A mortality study from Wales found no ex cess risk of respiratory cancer death among asbestoscement workers employed after 1936 (4). Also from oth er countries, like Sweden, England, Austria, and Bel gium, no elevated risk of mesothelioma or lung cancer has been reported (5-8), and some studies have even indicated a lower mortality from lung cancer in the as bestos-cement industry than in other industries in which asbestos has been handled (9). A possible explanation of these results could be the predominant use of the chrysotile type of asbestos in production. However, in other studies excess mortality due to respiratory cancer and pleural neoplasms has indeed been found among asbestos-cement workers mainly exposed to chrysotile fibers (10-12). There have been indicators of increased risk of oth er cancers as well, including larynx cancer (13,14) and gastrointestinal cancers (6-8). The proportion attribut ed to asbestos exposure is probably lower, and the evi dence for a causal association is not strong. Diverging opinions on this relationship have therefore been report ed (15,16). The question of whether different fiber types pos sess different carcinogenic potential remains largely un answered and controversial, as the mixed nature of most fiber exposures makes the interpretation more compli cated. The worldwide consumption and production of asbestos peaked in 1978-1979 (17). In Lithuania, how ever, asbestos use on industrial sites continued at very high levels until 1990. There are two factories that have manufactured asbestos-cement pipes and plates in this country. In both plants only chrysotile asbestos was used, and the asbestos came from mines in the Ural area 1 Lithuanian Cancer Registry, Oncology Institute of Vilnius University, Lithuania. 2 The Cancer Registry of Norway, Montebello, Oslo, Norway. Reprint requests to: Giedre Smailyte, Lithuanian Cancer Registry, Polocko 2, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2007. [E-mail: giedresm@one.lt] 64 Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1 Smailyte et al of Russia and Kazakhstan, The content of tremolite fib ers in Russian asbestos is much lower than in Canadian chrysotile (18), and a Swedish study (5) concluded that a relatively low risk of lung cancer was seen when only chrysotile was used in production, We undertook our study to investigate the incidence of cancer and mortality among workers at the two as bestos-cement factories in Lithuania, This is the first study on workers exposed to asbestos in asbestos-ce ment production through a period of almost 50 years in Lithuania, It was also aimed at estimating the risk by du ration of employment as an exposure surrogate and by period of employment and time since first exposure, We also widened the scope to provide further information on cancer risk associated with chrysotile asbestos only, Material and methods Description of the factories There are two asbestos-cement factories in Lithuania, situated in the northwestern part of the country, The Daugeliai Building Products Factory had used asbestos from 1956 for producing asbestos-cement plates (facto ry A). The Akmene Cement Factory (factory B) had pro duced asbestos-cement plates and pipes since 1963, Two production lines, one for pipes and one for plates, were located in one building and in the same hall, Both fac tories ran a wet type of process, and the products con tained about 15% asbestos by weight, The main asbes tos emissions occurred when asbestos was added to the cement-water mix and during the preparation of the fi nal products, The asbestos was delivered in sacks, which were manually opened before the content was dumped into the mill, There has been no essential change in the process during the history of the two factories, Altogether, almost 600 000 tonnes of raw asbestos were used from 1956 to 2000 with a maximum of 20 000 tonnes per year in the period 1986-1990, The asbestos consumption in both factories remained at the same level up to 1990, when it started to decline, The use of asbestos stopped in 1997 in factory A and in 2000 in factory B, Exposure The exposure data from the two plants are scanty, and from factory A no exposure data were available, For factory B data on annual dust mass measurements exist for each year from 1975 to 1993, and, for a more recent period, 1996-1998, measurements on fibers (f) per mil liliter are available, In the period 1975-1989, the timeweighted average measurements of chrysotile asbestos and total asbestos-cement dust varied from 1,9 to 4,0 mg/m3, and in 1990-1993 the corresponding value was 1,2-2,2 mg/m3, In 1996-1998 the fiber concentra tion showed the highest levels for workers who fed the mill with asbestos from sacks and for those involved in sawing the end products, The exposure level for these two groups was 0,5--1,0 f/ml, while most of the other workers were exposed to 0,1--0,5 f/ml, The preparation and handling of the asbestos-cement products were sim ilar during the whole production period, but some im provement in the ventilation was made, Respirators had been recommended since 1970, and they became man datory in the last decade, Study cohort A cohort of all male and female workers from the two asbestos-cement factories was established with identi fication of production and maintenance workers, labo ratory workers who examined the end products, and technologists, For all the workers, we received the fol lowing information: name, date of birth, department (factory B), and the beginning and ending dates of all employments, even for those who had been employed more than once, Six workers had worked in both facto ries, and for them we used total employment data from both factories, Included in the study were all the work ers employed 3 months or more before 1986, from 1956 in factory A and from 1963 in factory B, The year 1985 was chosen as the last year for entry because asbestosrelated cancers have a long induction period, seldom less than 15 years, The study was confined to workers alive at the beginning of the follow-up period on 1 January 1978, We received information on 2787 workers, 1972 men and 815 women (table 1), but only 1887 workers met the criteria for inclusion in the study and contribut ed with 36 703 person-years, Excluded from the study were 18% because of first entry after 1985, and another 9% were excluded because of the total employment time was less than 3 months, Ninety-nine persons (3,6%) of the workforce were lost to follow-up before 1978 and were also excluded from the study, Methods The study population was followed for cancer incidence, date of emigration, and date of death from the begin ning of 1978 to the end of 2000 in the local migration office and in the Bureau of Addresses of the Central Population Register, Members of the study not identi fied from these two sources were traced through the Registry Department of the Lithuanian National Histo ry Archive for date of death, The cancer cases in the cohort were identified in the Lithuanian Cancer Register through linkage procedures by name and date of birth, In Lithuania, the registration of cancer incidence is based on compulsory reporting Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1 65 Mortality and morbidity of cancer in Lithuanian workers Table 1. Description of the cohort from two Lithuanian asbestos-cement factories. Status Factory A Factory B Men Women (N) (N) Men Women (N) (N) Men N% Factory workers Excluded from the study Employed less than 3 months First entry after 1985 Dead before 1978 Emigrated before 1978 Lost to follow-up before 1978 Included in the study 628 296 13 2 93 61 18 5 10 13 18 490 210 1344 519 187 46 290 58 18 2 52 49 19 795 392 1972 100 200 10.1 383 19.4 36 1.8 6 0.3 62 3.1 1285 65.2 a Six workers who worked in both factories have been included in the number of factory B workers. Total Women N% 815 100 Total N% 2787 100 a 48 5.9 119 14.6 7 0.9 2 0.2 37 4.5 602 73.9 248 8.9 502 18.0 43 1.5 8 0.3 99 3.6 1887 67.7 of all new cancer eases from all hospitals. The data were available in a computerized database from 1978 on. The cancer diagnoses and causes of death were coded ac cording to the 9th revision of the International Classifi cation of diseases (ICD-9). Five cancer cases diagnosed before 1978 were not included among the observed cas es. Copies of death certificates were obtained from the Archive Department of the local municipality and the Registry Department of the Lithuanian National Histo ry Archive and coded at the Cancer Registry. Between 1978 and 1993, the causes of death in Lithuania were coded according to the Soviet modification of the ICD9 and the conventional ICD-9 for 1994-1996. From 1997 on, the causes of death were registered with ICD10 codes and recoded to ICD-9 codes. The cancer deaths in the cohort were compared with the cancer incidence data. For two workers the cancer diagnoses on the death certificates were the only information, and the one case of lung cancer and one case of colon cancer were not added to the cancer incidence data. The study was based on a comparison of observed and expected numbers of cancers and deaths. Standard ized incidence ratios (SIR) and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated by the person-years meth od, STATA (19), with expected numbers of cancer cas es and deaths based on gender-specific rates in 5-year age groups and 5-year observation periods for the total Lithuanian population. The follow-up started after 3 months of total employment for those with first entry after 1 January 1978. Workers who died or emigrated were followed until the time of these events, while all others were followed to the end of 2000. For six work ers lost to follow-up after 1978, person-years were cal culated up to the end of employment at the factory. For all SIR values and SMR values, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated on the assumption of a Poisson distribution for the observed number of cancer cases. If the observed number was zero, we have given the expected number in brackets in the table. 66 Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1 Results During the 23 years of follow-up, 473 deaths were ob served versus 489 expected (table 2). For the men, a low risk of mortality of nonmalignant respiratory diseases was observed (SMR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0). Accidents and violence among the men caused 75 deaths versus 81.3 expected (SMR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1). The mortal ity rates for this cause of death were much higher for the men than the women, but the results are close to the expected values from the general population. In addi tion, a nonsignificantly elevated risk of mortality of nonmalignant diseases in the digestive organs was found for the men, 18 observed versus 12.2 expected (SMR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.3). This finding was mainly due to a sig nificant increase in mortality from cirrhosis of the liver (SMR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1--3.6), based on 11 observed cas es. No excess mortality was observed for other causes of death. No death of pneumoconiosis was identified. There was no increased incidence for all cancers combined, 170 cases observed and 171 expected (table 3). No case of mesothelioma was found among the men, and only one had occurred among the women. The lat ter was found in a 66-year-old woman with 14 years since first employment in asbestos-cement plate produc tion. Furthermore, our study showed 29 observed cases of lung cancer versus 31.1 expected (SIR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.3) for the men, and 7 observed cases of laryngeal cancer (SIR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.9). However, a signifi cant excess risk was observed for cancer in the large intestine among the men (SIR 1.6 based on 17 cancer cases, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Table 4 shows the observed numbers of selected types of cancer by duration of employment and latency period. For lung cancer there was an excess risk for those with the shortest duration of employment (SIR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-2.6) and no increasing trend in risk by du ration of employment or latency periods. For laryngeal cancer no case was observed the first 14 years or among those with less than 1 year of total employment. The risk Smailyte et al Table 2. Observed number of deaths and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for the Lithuanian asbestos-cement workers during the follow-up period, 1978-2000. (95% CI = 95% confidence interval) Cause of death a Men Women Observed SMR 95% CI Observed b SMR 95% CI All causes (001-999) Infectious diseases (001-139) Malignant neoplasms (140-208) Circulatory diseases (390-459) Respiratory diseases (460-519) Diseases of the digestive system (520-579) Cirrhosis of liver (571) Diseases of the genitourinary system (580-629) Accidents and violence (800-999) Other causes of deaths 391 1.0 0.9-1.1 7 0.9 0.4-1.8 91 1.0 0.8-1.3 175 1.0 0.9-1.2 14 0.6 0.4-1.0 18 1.5 0.9-2.3 11 2.0 1.1-3.6 3 0.6 0.2-1.8 75 0.9 0.7-1.1 8 c 0.5 0.2-0.9 82 1.0 0.8-1.3 [0.9] 27 1.1 0.8-1.6 37 1.0 0.7-1.4 [2.7] 4 1.3 0.5-3.3 2 1.5 0.4-6.0 1 0.7 0.1-4.8 8 0.9 0.5-1.8 5 0.9 0.4-2.3 a Code of the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases in parentheses. b Expected numbers in brackets when no case was observed. c Three unknown causes of death. Table 3. Observed number of new cancer cases and the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for the asbestos-cement workers during the follow-up period, 1978-2000. (95% CI = 95% confidence interval) Cancer site a Men Women Observed b SIR 95% CI Observed SIR 95% CI All malignant neoplasms (140-208) Stomach (151) Colon and rectum (153, 154) Lung (162) Pleura (163) Breast (174, 175) Female genital organs (179-184) Alcohol-related cancers c Other types of cancer 122 1.0 0.8-1.2 14 0.9 0.5-1.5 17 1.6 1.0-2.6 29 0.9 0.7-1.3 [0.3] [0.3] 14 1.0 0.6-1.7 48 0.9 0.7-1.2 48 1.0 0.7-1.3 4 1.2 0.4-3.2 3 0.8 0.1-1.8 1 0.7 0.1-4.6 1 20.1 2.9-142.3 8 0.8 0.4-1.6 14 1.2 0.7-2.0 1 1.1 0.2-5.9 16 0.8 0.5-1.3 a Code of the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases in parentheses. b Expected numbers in brackets when no case was observed. c Includes cancers of tongue, mouth and pharynx (141-149), oesophagus (150), liver (155) and larynx (161). of laryngeal cancer in the group of workers with more than 10 years of employment was lower (SIR 1.3, 95% CI 0.4-5.7) than in the groups with shorter employment. The highest SIR values for colorectal cancer were found among the workers with the shortest employment time (SIR 2.2, 95% CI 0.8-5.7, based on 4 cases) and among the workers with a duration of employment of more than 10 years (SIR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.7). There was no clear trend by duration of employment or latency periods. For lung cancer, the material was explored by period of first exposure, but no clear risk pattern was found. Discussion Our study of asbestos-cement workers from Lithuania did not indicate any work-related excess in the causes of death or incidence of cancer expected from asbestos exposure. Only one case of pleural mesothelioma was found, and, furthermore, the study showed no deaths from pneumoconiosis. The cohort was small and included 37 000 personyears, and it is therefore difficult to draw firm conclu sions. However, the cohort included many long-term workers, as 29% of the cohort had 10 years or more of total employment in an asbestos-cement industry and 96.4% showed completeness in follow up. Individual and reliable exposure measurements were lacking. From one of the factories some exposure data existed from 1975 and thereafter, and we therefore used the number of years of employment as a surrogate measure for cu mulative exposure. Both factories have used chrysotile asbestos only, imported from the Sverdlovsk region of Russia, and the measured airborne dust was low compared with that of other asbestos-cement factories (table 5). However, we assumed that the levels of exposure were somewhat higher in the period before 1990, because the gravimet ric dust measurements were shown to be higher than for Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1 67 Mortality and morbidity of cancer in Lithuanian workers Table 4. Observed numbers of selected types of cancer and the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for the male asbestos-cement workers by duration of employment and time since first exposure. (95% CI = 95% confidence interval) Type of cancera Time since first exposure <14 years 15-24 years >25 years Total Observed b SIR Observed b SIR Observed b SIR Observed b SIR 95% CI All sites (140-208) <1 years 1-4 years 5-9 years >10 years Total Stomach (151) <1 years 1-4 years 5-9 years >10 years Total Colon and rectum (153, 154) <1 years 1-4 years 5-9 years >10 years Total 1 6 4 1 12 [0.5] 1 [0.5] [0.4] 1 [0.2] [0.4] 2 [0.2] 2 0.3 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.8 1.2 0.5 7.1 1.8 12 1.4 15 0.9 12 1.5 20 1.3 59 1.2 1 0.8 4 1.6 1 1.1 3 1.4 9 1.3 2 2.8 [1.4] 1 1.4 5 4.2 8 2.0 9 0.9 27 1.3 8 1.1 7 0.3 51 0.9 [1.1] 3 1.3 1 1.3 [2.7] 4 0.6 2 2.2 2 1.2 [0.7] 3 1.5 7 1.6 22 1.0 0.7-1.5 48 1.1 0.8-1.4 24 1.3 0.9-2.0 28 0.7 0.5-1.1 122 1.0 0.8-1.2 1 0.4 0.1-2.6 8 1.4 0.7-2.8 2 0.8 0.2-3.3 3 0.6 0.2-1.9 14 0.9 0.5-1.5 4 2.2 0.8-5.7 2 0.5 0.2-2.1 3 1.8 0.6-5.6 8 2.4 1.2-4.7 17 1.6 1.0-2.6 Larynx (161) <1 years 1-4 years 5-9 years >10 years Total Lung (162) <1 years 1-4 years 5-9 years >10 years Total [0.2] [0.3] [0.1] [0.2] [0.7] 1 1.3 1 0.7 1 1.1 [0.7] 3 0.8 [0.4] 1 1.2 1 3.3 2 3.0 4 1.9 4 1.8 5 1.1 3 1.6 3 0.8 15 1.2 [0.4] 2 2.4 1 4.2 [0.7] 3 1.4 3 1.2 4 0.7 3 1.7 1 0.2 11 0.7 [0.9] 3 1.6 0.5-4.8 2 3.0 0.8-12.5 2 1.3 0.4-5.7 7 1.4 0.7-2.9 8 1.5 0.8-3.0 10 0.9 0.5-1.7 7 1.5 0.7-3.2 4 0.4 0.2-1.1 29 0.9 0.7-1.3 a Code of the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases in parentheses. a Expected numbers in brackets when no case was observed the period after 1990. But still these concentrations were low compared with the airborne dust levels reported in other studies. In a recent paper from Norway the gravi metric data shoved concentrations of 0.2-22.8 mg/m3, and the fiber concentrations were estimated to be be tween 100 and 1900 f/ml in 1964, with less than 5 f/ml for later years (20). In the Norwegian study no case of mesothelioma was found among those with less than 5 years of employment. Nor was any increased risk of ma lignant mesothelioma found in other studies in which chrysotile asbestos was used in production (4-6). In a study from Canada (21), the asbestos-cement board pro duction workers used chrysotile only, while another group of workers produced pipes with crocidolite in ad dition to chrysotile. The latter group showed a consid erable increase in mesothelioma risk, while no cases of 68 Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1 mesothelioma were found among the board production workers. Mesothelioma has mainly been associated with exposure to amphiboles (22). No amphiboles were add ed to the Lithuanian asbestos-cement production; how ever, our study is noninformative concerning asbestos exposure and mesothelioma risk, with one observed case and 0.3 expected. We found no excess risk of lung cancer, and no clearer picture emerged when the data were tabulated according period of employment or number of years since first exposure. The use of national cancer inci dence rates as reference may be inappropriate and may have biased the estimates. The lung cancer incidence rates for the districts in which the factories are located averaged 120% of the national rates in 1993-1997. The low risk of lung cancer for asbestos cement workers Smailyte et al Table 5. Results of cohort studies on asbestos-exposed workers the asbestos-cement industry. (SMR = standardized mortality ratio, SIR = standardized incidence ratio) Study Country Number Employ of ment subjects (length) Follow-up Lung cancer Meso- Exposure level cases theli- (fibers/ml) oma Cases SMR cases or SIR (N) Type of asbestos used Thomas et al, 1982 (4) Ohlson & Hogstedt, 1985 (5) Gardner et al, 1986 (6) Lacquet et al, 1980 (8) United Kingdom Sweden England Belgium Szeszenia-Dabrowska et al, 1997 (24) Poland Neuberger & Kundi, 1990 (7) Austria Tulchinski et al, 1999 (11) Israel Albin et al, 1990 (10) Raffn et al, 1989 (23) Sweden Denmark Ulvestad et al, 2002 (20) Norway Finkelstein, 1983 (21) Canada 1592 6 months 1936-1977 1176 3 months 1951-1982 1510 1941-1984 1963 1 year 1963-1977 3563 3 months 1945-1991 2816 3 years 1950-1987 3057 1 month 1978-1992 1929 3 months 1927-1986 7996 1943-1984 541 1 year 1953-1999 241 9 years 1960-1980 30 0.93 2 <2 (after 1972) Chrysotile 11 1.23 - 2 Chrysotile 35 0.92 1 <1 (after 1970) Chrysotile 22 a 1.0 1 0.4-100 90% chrysotile, crocidolite and amosite 41 0.97 5 85% chrysotile, crocidolite and amosite 49 1.04 b 7 Chrysotile and crocidolite 28 1.35 21 0.3-40.0 90% chrysotile and crocidolite 35 1.8 c 13 0.3-6.3 >95% chrysotile 162 1.8 10 >2 (in 1973) 89% chrysotile, cro (41% of samples) cidolite and amosite 33 3.1 18 <5 (after 1973) 92% chrysotile, cro cidolite and amosite 20 6.1 10 d 40 (in 1949) Chrysotile and 20 (in 1969) crocidolite a Respiratory cancer including mesothelioma. b After adjustment for smoking. c Relative risk. d Including peritoneal mesotheliomas. seems to be unrelated to this difference. The short-term workers in our study had a higher incidence rate from lung cancer and a higher risk compared with the group of long-term workers. Such patterns have been observed in other studies, and it is probably due to life-style fac tors with smoking as the strongest candidate. The low lung cancer risk among the workers employed more than 10 years remains unexplained, and an extension of the follow-up time would be of value. The smoking habits of the cohort members were not known. The Norwegian study (20) showed an excess risk of lung cancer, but no trend in risk by duration of employment. This lack of dose-response relationship is in accordance with the re sults of other Nordic studies from the asbestos-cement industry with duration of exposure as a dose surrogate (20, 23). The type of fibers may also be relevant for lung can cer, as workers making asbestos-cement products from chrysotile have shown lower rates than those working with other types of asbestos (4-6). Ohlson & Hogstedt (5) postulated that the fiber types used in the factories could also explain the different results in lung cancer risk. In three studies of asbestos-cement workers, in which chrysotile was almost exclusively used (4-6), the combined results of the asbestos-cement workers showed overall 76 deaths from lung cancer compared with 80.2 expected (SMR 0,95, 95% CI 0.8--1.2) (6). The exposure levels reported in these studies on chrysotile-exposed workers were generally lower than in other asbestos-cement studies, with average fiber concentrations of 1 to 2 f/ml (4-6). In the study from Denmark, an in creased lung cancer risk was found with fiber concen trations of 10-100 f/ml until 1973, and 41% of the meas urements were above 2 f/ml after 1973 (23). Even stud ies in which chrysotile and amphiboles were used in as bestos-cement production have reported a lack of ele vated lung cancer risk (7, 8, 24). In the study from Aus tria, excess mortality from lung cancer was shown to be related to higher tobacco consumption among the asbes tos-cement workers (7). From Poland, where Russian chrysotile was used, an absence of lung cancer risk was reported in a study from four asbestos-cement factories (24). The amount and type of asbestos fibers have been determined from lung tissue samples of workers at the largest asbestos mine in the world, at Asbest in Russia. In workers exposed to Russian chrysotile, there was less than 10% tremolite, while 50% tremolite was found in a Canadian study of tissue samples (18). In addition, the tremolite fibers from the Russian samples were much thicker than the chrysotile fibers from Canada. It may also be of importance that most chrysotile fibers are cleared from the lungs within weeks or months. This type of chrysotile seems to be less carcinogenic than other types of asbestos fibers. In our study, the standardized incidence ratio of colorectal cancer was elevated, but there was no clear trend by latency period (table 4). Some epidemiologic studies have also shown an excess of gastrointestinal carcinomas among asbestos-exposed workers, especially Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1 69 Mortality and morbidity of cancer in Lithuanian workers of colorectal cancers (10, 25, 26). However, the associ ation between asbestos exposure and gastrointestinal cancer is not definite. In our study no association with duration of employment and time since first exposure was found. In Lithuania asbestosis is not registered as a sepa rate disease; instead it is included in the group of pneu moconioses. The registered number of deaths from pneumoconiosis is less than 10 per year; however, the underreporting of pneumoconiosis (asbestosis) as a cause of death in Lithuania may not contribute to the study results. Our study did not show any excess risk of respirato ry cancer or death of pneumoconiosis, and for total mor tality the results were at the same level as for the total population. The low incidence rates of lung cancer in our study are somewhat remarkable. This type of chrysotile without any amphiboles and a small amount of tremolite is possibly less carcinogenic than other types of asbestos. Relatively low exposure levels at both fac tories and the use of chrysotile asbestos only were pos sible explanations of the nonpositive outcome. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the administration of the facto ries in Akmene and Daugeliai and the staffs of the local migration offices for all their practical help with the con struction of the cohort and the identification of the study cohort. We also thank the Thoracic Department of the Oncology Institute for the validation of the diagnosis of mesothelioma. References 1. Selikoff IJ, Chung J, Hammond EC. Asbestos exposure and neoplasia. J Am Med Assoc 1964;188: 22-6. 2. Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mes othelioma and the asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Ind Med 1960;17:260-71. 3. Doll R. Mortality from lung cancer in asbestos workers. Br J Ind Med 1955;12:81-6. 4. Thomas HF, Benjamin IT, Elwood PC, Sweetnaam PM. Fur ther follow-up study of workers from an asbestos cement factory. Br J Ind Med 1982;39:273-6. 5. Ohlson CG, Hogstedt C. Lung cancer among asbestos ce ment workers: a Swedish cohort study and a review. Br J Ind Med 1985;42:397-402. 6. Gardner MJ, Winter PD, Pannett B, Powell CA. Follow up study of workers manufacturing chrysotile asbestos cement products. Br J Ind Med 1986;43:726-32. 7. Neuberger M, Kundi M. Individual asbestos exposure: smok ing and mortality--a cohort study in the asbestos cement industry. Br J Ind Med 1990;47:615-20. 8. Lacquet LM, Van der Linden L, Lepoutre J. Roentgenographic lung changes, asbestosis and mortality in a Belgian asbestos-cement factory. In: Wagner JC, editor. Biological effects of mineral fibres. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980. Scientific publication no 30. 9. Advisory Committee on Asbestos. Health and Safety Com mission, volume 1. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1979. Final report. 10. Albin M, Jakobsson K, Attewell R, Johansson L, Welinder H. Mortality and cancer morbidity in cohorts of asbestos cement workers and referents. Br J Ind Med 1990;47:602-10. 11. Tulchinsky TH, Ginsberg GM, Iscovich J, Shihab S, Fischbein A, Richter ED. Cancer in ex-asbestos cement workers in Israel, 1953-1992. Am J Ind Med 1999;35:1-8. 12. Raffn E, Villadsen E, Engholm G, Lynge E. Lung cancer in asbestos cement workers in Denmark. Occup Environ Med 1997;54:143. 13. Chan CK, Gee BL. Asbestos exposure and laryngeal cancer: an analysis of the epidemiologic evidence. J Occup Med 1988;30:23-7. 14. Piolatto G, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Pira E, Decarli A, Peto J. An update of cancer mortality among chrysotile asbestos miners in Balangero, northern Italy. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47:810-4. 15. Brown K, Gee JB. Asbestos exposure and laryngeal cancer. Ann Occup Hyg 2000;44:239-50. 16. Homa DM, Garabrant DH, Gillespie BW. A meta-analysis of colorectal cancer and asbestos exposure. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139:1210-22. 17. Asbestos Institute (Montreal). Favourable growth prospects for asbestos in Asia. Asbestos 1985;1:4-5. 18. Tossavainen A, Kovalevsky E, Vanhala E, Tuomi T. Pulmo nary mineral fibers after occupational exposure to asbestos in the Russian chrysotile industry. Am J Ind Med 2000;37:32733. 19. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 7.0. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation, 2001. 20. Ulvestad B, Kjsrheim K, Martinsen JI, Damberg G, Wannag A, Mowe G, et al. Cancer incidence among workers in the asbestos-cement producing industry in Norway. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002;28(6):411-7. 21. Finkelstein MM. Mortality among long-term employees of an Ontario asbestos-cement factory. Br J Ind Med 1983; 40:138-40. 22. Britton M. The epidemiology of mesothelioma. Semin Oncol 2002;29:18-25. 23. Raffn E, Lynge E, Juel K, Kongsgaard B. Incidence of cancer and mortality among employees in the asbestos cement in dustry in Denmark. Br J Ind Med 1989;45:283-91. 24. Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Wilczynska U, Szymczak W. Ryzyko choroby nowotworowej w premysle azbestovo-cementowym w Polsce [Cancer risk in asbestos-cement indus try workers in Poland]. Med Pr 1997;48:473-83. 25. McDonald JC, Liddell FDK, Gibbs GW, Eyssen GE, Mc Donald AD. Dust exposure and mortality in chrysotile min ing, 1910-75. Br J Ind Med 1980;37:11-24. 26. Enterline PE, Hartley J, Henderson V. Asbestos and cancer: a cohort followed up to death. Br J Ind Med 1987;44:396-401. Received for publication: 31 December 2002 70 Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, vol 30, no 1